Is it possible to force row level locking in Sql server 2015 before inserting the data and release the same afterwords..find the code for which we would like to impliment the same
DECLARE @TravelAgentid Varchar(20)
DECLARE @Date DATETIME2(7)
DECLARE @InsDate DATETIME2(7)
set @TravelAgentid ='A101'
[code]....
HiIs it possible to force row level locking in one or more tables insome database. We have some problems when SQL Server decides to choosepage- or table-level locking.We are using SQL Server 2000.Best regardsAarno
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have one table.We have updated the status for one column to 1 and we did not committed the transaction. Can we do an another update on another row.
In below example i am updating GEO_D and transaction is not committed. Now my requirement is we have to update other records (not Geo_D). If try to update GEo_D it should wait.
IF OBJECT_ID('TEMPDB..##TEMP_STSTUS') IS NOT NULL
DROP TABLE ##TEMP_STSTUS
CREATE TABLE ##TEMP_STSTUS
(
ID INT IDENTITY(1,1)
,NAME VARCHAR(10)
,STSTUS VARCHAR(10)
)
INSERT INTO ##TEMP_STSTUS SELECT 'GEO_D','0'
[Code] ....
I'm running SQL Server 7.0. I have a DB running with 6.5 compatibility mode.
Do INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE queries use row level locking in this DB ?
(I know if I set the db compatibility mode to 7.0 row level locking will be enabled)
Thanks in advance for your help.
Hi, Can anybody please explain me, what is low level and high level locking in SQL Server 2005 database.
Also what is the name of process which converts low level locking into high level locking and vise versa.
-Sanjeev
When I deploy the cube which is sitting on my PC (local) the following 4 errors come up:
Error 1 The datasource , 'AdventureWorksDW', contains an ImpersonationMode that that is not supported for processing operations. 0 0
Error 2 Errors in the high-level relational engine. A connection could not be made to the data source with the DataSourceID of 'Adventure Works DW', Name of 'AdventureWorksDW'. 0 0
Error 3 Errors in the OLAP storage engine: An error occurred while the dimension, with the ID of 'Customer', Name of 'Customer' was being processed. 0 0
Error 4 Errors in the OLAP storage engine: An error occurred while the 'Customer Alternate Key' attribute of the 'Customer' dimension from the 'Analysis Services Tutorial' database was being processed. 0 0
We have a need for getting data from sqlserver DB on premise to the cloud. DB is not encrypted currently, other applications are accessing it but those applications are on premise. Following link talks about encrypted connection, but is it possible to encrypt only one of the port connection. we can add a custom port.URL...
View 3 Replies View Related<g class="gr_ gr_78 gr-alert gr_gramm Punctuation replaceWithoutSep" data-gr-id="78" id="78">Friends,</g>
<g class="gr_ gr_78 gr-alert gr_gramm Punctuation replaceWithoutSep" data-gr-id="78" id="78">I</g>
i am migrating one database from SQL Server 2008 where I have around 20 databases to SQLServer 2012. To migrate the login I was thinking about to use SP_Help <g class="gr_ gr_114 gr-alert gr_spell ContextualSpelling ins-del multiReplace" data-gr-id="114" id="114">revlogin</g> store procedure but now what I believe is this SP scripts out whole server level login and I don't need all the logins in the server except related to the database that I am migrating to.
<g class="gr_ gr_418 gr-alert gr_gramm Grammar multiReplace" data-gr-id="418" id="418">please</g>
best way to migrate logins only related to the specific database to the new server.
I have the following table:
Create Table Item(
I_Code NVarChar(40) Primary Key NOT NULL,
I_MatID NVarChar(40),
I_Name NVarChar(160),
I_BC nvarchar(20),
I_Company nvarchar(20),
I_CompanyFound nvarchar(20),
I_Info1 nvarchar(55),
I_Acquired nvarchar(35),
I_Info2 nvarchar(55),
I_Info3 nvarchar(55),
I_Date DateTime DEFAULT GetDate()
);
Create Index ind_Item_Name on Item(I_Name);
Create Index ind_Item_BC on Item(I_BC);
Create Index ind_Item_Company on Item(I_Company);
Create Index ind_Item_CompanyFound on Item(I_CompanyFound);
create Index ind_Item_i1 on Item(I_Company,I_CompanyFound);
create Index ind_Item_i2 on Item(I_CompanyFound,I_Company);
Now this query DOES NOT use index:
select I_Name, I_Code, I_MatID, I_BC, I_Company,I_Info1, I_Acquired, I_CompanyFound, 0 as I_Found
from Item
where (I_Company='102' or I_CompanyFound='102' )
While this one use:
select I_Name, I_Code, I_MatID, I_BC, I_Company,I_Info1, I_Acquired, I_CompanyFound, 0 as I_Found
from Item
where (I_Company='102' )
UNION
select I_Name, I_Code, I_MatID, I_BC, I_Company,I_Info1, I_Acquired, I_CompanyFound, 0 as I_Found
from Item
where (I_CompanyFound='102' )
Both return the same rows. Is this a bug? I found the following:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/223423
Some feedback?
Thanks
I have a busy transactional table , I wanna use row level locking mechanism in msSQL.
SELECT * FROM PARTY WITH (UPDLOCK ROWLOCK)
where LastName ='Clinton'
is there any downsides of this approach?
I used sp_indexoption to allow row locks and disallow page locks on all indexes of a heavily contented table (lots of concurrent selects/inserts/updates). The first error I saw was "The SQL Server cannot obtain a LOCK resource at this time. Rerun your statement when there are fewer active users or ask the system administrator to check the SQL Server lock and memory configuration.". I restarted the sql server and everything is ok (the server is not very powerful and will be beefed up).
My question is that with the above settings, will the select statements acquire row-level shared locks as well? Since our select queries are fairly complicated, my main concern is that we may frequently run of of resource even with a more powerful machine. Is my concern valid or I got everything wrong?
Thanks a lot.
Hi there,
yes, There is a 'insert row level locking' but
Is there anything for delete or update row level locking?
We keep geting deadlock problem with our application with multi-users. First we ran into the deadlock on INSERT. By setting 'insert row level locking' help us to go a little bit further but later we run into deadlock with DELETE. For my knowlege, DELETE and UPDATE requires exclusive page lock. Might be I am out of date.
Thanks in advance for your help
Tung Nguyen
How do I do row-level locking on SQL Server?Thanks,Nid
View 16 Replies View RelatedHello all.
I have the following table
Create Table Item(
I_AssetCode NVarChar(40) Primary Key NOT NULL,
I_Name NVarChar(160),
I_BC nvarchar(20),
I_Company nvarchar(20)
);
Create Index ind_Item_Name on Item(I_Name);
Create Index ind_Item_BC on Item(I_BC);
Create Index ind_Item_Company on Item(I_Company);
It is populated with 50 000 records.
Searching on indexed columns is fast, but I've run into the following problem:
I need to get all distinct companies in the table.
I've tried with these two queries, but they both are very slow!
1. "select I_Company from item group by I_Company " - This one takes 19 seconds
2. "select distinct(I_Company) from item" -This one takes 29 secons
When I ran them through the SQL Management Studio and checked the performance plan, I saw that the second one doesn't use index at all ! So I focused on the first...
The first one used index (it took it 15% of the time), but then it ran the "stream aggregate" which took 85% of the time !
Actully 15% of 19 seconds - about 2 seconds is pretty much enough for me. But it looks that aggregate function is run for nothing!
So is it possible to force the query engine of the SSCE not to run it, since there is actually no aggregate functions in my select clause?
According to SQL CE Books online:
Group By
"Specifies the groups (equivalence classes) that output rows are to be placed in. If aggregate functions are included in the SELECT clause <select list>, the GROUP BY clause calculates a summary value for each group."
It seems the aggregate is run every time, not only when there is an aggregate function.
Is this a bug?
Thanks in advance,
TipoMan
I am writing a VB program, which needs to update record A in one table using transaction control (BeginTrans & CommitTrans). But due to the page-level locking, before the "CommitTrans", other users couldn't not read other records in the same table.
Is there any way that I can do the record/row level locking? If possible, could you provide me some VB source code? Such as how to use "DBCC ROWLOCK" or how to set for row-level locking.
Thanks for your kind help.
SQL Server 6.5 on-line help states that IRL is only effective if the table has a unique clustered index defined on the table. IF this true and if so does anyone know why.
thanks,
Stu.
Hi,We have encountered deadlock on a table which is used to generatesequential numbers for different categories eg typical entriesCategory ValueTRADE_NO 1456JOB_NO 267.....The applications reference the relevant category applicable to themand updatethe Value accordingly. This is table is very small, occupying 1 page.However, it has no index as it was not seen to be appropriate for atable this size.However, can someone please advise whether1. An index is required for row level locking2. If an index on a table as small as above is likely to reduce thedeadlock rate.Also, please consider the following but which I am not sure isrelevant for above query.We noted that when we migrated the database concerned from SQL 6.5 toSQL 2000, using DTS, that the database was NOT strictly in SQL 2000format for non clustered indexes (NC) ie the clustered key was notpart of the NC index until the clustered index was rebuilt.Given this should I just rebuild this table with a fake index and dropit thereafter.We are aware of the different techniques used to avoid deadlocks (egtables accessed in same order etc) and have , as much as possible,implemented those practices.I thank you in advance for any help you may be able to offer.ThanksPuvendran
View 12 Replies View RelatedI m using sql server 2005
i have got one request ,to apply page level locking on database
can nyone how it is done
i can do that for a single script and for session(transaction isolation level)
but dont know about database level locking scheme
thanks in advance
Hi all
We are writing a web-based multi-user call centre application application.
we are getting concurrency problems as you would expect with a multiuser application.
the application is made for callers who will bring up a different contact to call based on some predefined priority. now because the algorithm that prioritises the contacts takes a good 2 seconds to run, if 2 different caller request for the next prioritised contact, they will retrieve the same contact.
The only way that we think can resolve this problem is by building a queue. The queue would be implemented as a table, the particular implementation of this queue would be, when ever someone retrieves an entry from the queue, a background process will go on and generate a new queued item, i.e. in a FIFO manner. So that's how we think we should implement the queue.
Now come the question how to implement it. My idea is to have row level locking and a trigger to remove queue items from the queue. so that once one caller have looked at one of the item in the queue, another user can't look at the same item.
Any suggestions as to how i might be able to avoid concurrency problems?
What do you all think of my idea of implementing the FIFO queue?/
Is it possible to do row level locking in such a way that other users won't even be able to read the locked entry??
James :)
I am running one maintenance plan which includes just "Chech DB Integrity" and "Reorganised Index". But it failed and I am getting following error:-
Failed-1073548784) Executing the query "ALTER INDEX [CgiExclusion_ProfileId] ON [dbo].[CgiExclusion] REORGANIZE WITH ( LOB_COMPACTION = ON )" failed with the following error: "The index "CgiExclusion_ProfileId" (partition 1) on table "CgiExclusion" cannot be reorganized because page level locking is disabled.". Possible failure reasons: Problems with the query, "ResultSet" property not set correctly, parameters not set correctly, or connection not established correctly.
I have a question on locking pattern of read committed with snapshot isolation level that when two transaction update two different records then why do they block to each other even if they have previous committed value (old version of record).
I executed the below batch from a query window in SSMS
--Session 1:
use adventureworks
create table marbles (id int primary key, color char(5))
insert marbles values(1, 'Black')
insert marbles values(2, 'White')
alter database adventureworks set read_committed_snapshot on
set transaction isolation level read committed
begin tran
update marbles set color = 'Black' where color = 'White'
--commit tran
Before committing the first transaction I executed below query from second query window in SSMS
--Session 2:
use adventureworks
set transaction isolation level read committed
begin tran
update marbles set color = 'White' where color = 'Black'
commit tran
Here the first session blocks to second session. These same transactions execute simultaneuosly in snapshot isolation level. So my question is why this blocking is required in read committed with snapshot isolation level?
Thanks & Regards,
Subhash Chandra
SQL2008R2...Have a SPID that started yesterday and contained a command to drop a server audit. This did not finish (after 3hrs) so I killed the SPID. Problem is it's still there (sp_who2) and I think it's now blocking access to viewing editing logins within SSMS as I'm getting "Lock request time out period exceeded. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 1222)" when double clicking a login.Do I need to restart the instance as killing the "alter server" transaction (SPID=62) is not working? Code to show blocking transactions returns this.
View 12 Replies View RelatedI have created a single Data Flow Task that reads a set of records from a source table and then makes determinations whether to insert, update or delete from a destination table. The data is basically being copied from one database to another with a small amount of data manipulation and lookups. The problem seems to be that when running the task, even a small amount of records read from the source table seem to take a long time for the task to finish. I feed the records into a Script Component (the brains) that sorts the records to three separate outputs. I use OLE DB Commands to perform the DELETE and UPDATE and an OLE DB Destination for INSERT. I thought that by using three separate database connections would help, but it just appears to be locked while trying to perform these commands against the same table.
Is there a way to control or route these three record sets in such a way as to perform them sequentially?
I know it's a bit of a simple question for some of you, but I'm just learning SSIS (but I like it!).
Thanks!
Jeff Tolman
E&M Electric
What is the best isolation level to be used to avoid deadlocks?
View 4 Replies View RelatedDoes a UPDLOCK request incur a physical write in any isolation level? (including read committed snapshot)
For example:
BEGIN TRANSACTION
SELECT col FROM dbo.test WITH ( UPDLOCK )
ROLLBACK
Is there any physical write taking place here?
Some labels such as 33314 are displaying over the columns. I need all labels to display at the top. How can I fix this without changing the size of the chart?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have 2 tables in my database.
one is Race table and 2nd one is Age Range.
I want to write a query where I can see all races and age range as column.
TblRace
ID, RaceName
TblAgeRange
ID,AgeRange.
There is no connection between this two table. I need to display result like below.
Race 17-20 21-30 31-40
A
B
I
W
How do i get this kind of empty data set so that I can fill it out in front end or any better solution. The age range will be displayed as many row as they have. It's not static. Above is just an example.
Server consolidation is the word of the day here. One of the elements is to use, when applicable, virtual machines in our devstageprod environment. Our sql servers (with local storage) are well utilized and run fine. I don't want to move the entire server (sql 2005 engine + data) into a VM as I think performance will be bad. But, per my question, if only the sql engine is running in a VM while the data is stored on our SAN, I think we may achieve acceptable performance.
Do you have any thought or experience with this mix of Vm and SAN from a sql perspective?
TIA,
Barkingdog
I need to encrypt some column level data in multiple tables in SQL server 2014. I've never tried encryption in SQL server 2014. How can I achieve it?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am trying to transition from Access to MS SQL. I downloaded and installed MS SQL 2005 Express and the Server Management Studio Express. Keep in mind that I am a total newbie to this database since I've always used Access. My question is, how do I insert data manually into my tables? I figured out how to set up a table and query a table, but is there somewhere I can just plug in data? In Access, I just open the table and type it in. Also, how do you set an auto increment numeric field in a table?- Jason
View 4 Replies View Relateddeclare @counter int
select @counter=300000
while @counter > 0
begin
insert into Revenue (Instr_type, Tel_no, Phone_Id, Rpt_date, Pay_mode)
values("PP0073", @counter, "080464", "19990901", 1)
select @counter=@counter-1
end
HI there,
I run the above statement in Query Analyzer and the expected result should be 300,000 records inserted into Revenue table. But unfortunately the actual records inserted were less than 300,000. I also realise that it insert different amount of record each time I run it. Can anyone please tell me why?
Thanks,
Will
Hi...
I have some problems with inserting data from one SQL Server to another SQL Server in a scheduled time...
Please help me......
Eva