Hi,
I want to create a trigger for DDL_LOGIN_EVENTS that will execute a procedure at the database level.
Something like this:
CREATE TRIGGER myTrigger
ON DATABASE
FOR DDL_LOGIN_EVENTS
AS
BEGIN
EXEC myProcedure
END
But I get an error: "The specified event type(s) is/are not valid on the specified target object."
Is there some other way to achieve the same thing?
-Anshul
Hi guys, may I know is it possible to create an update trigger like this ? Assuming there are two database, database A and database B and both are having same tables called 'Payments' table. I would like to update the Payments records on database A automatically after Payments records on database B had been updated. I can't use replication because both tables might having different records and some records are the same. Hope can get any assistance here, thank you.
Best Regards,
Hans
Hello everyone,I face currently a problem where I could need some input for searchingthe source of the ProblemSystem: SQL Server 9.0I fill from Database A with triggers Database B, everything worksfine.On Database B there is a Stored Procedures that checks the records andadd additional information accordingly, this Stored Procedures isnormally called by the application on "update and insert" in theaccording table.When I try to call this Stored Procedures from the Database A, thetrigger does not work anymore, even if I do a try catch over the wholetrigger, he never reach the Catch and the insert I try to do there toget the error message.On both Databases the user, that is taken to execute the trigger isexistent and DB-Owner of both Databases.If I go and execute the Stored Procedures manually after an insert orupdate to Database B everything works fine.I also already tried to check on Database B if there is an insert orupdate from Database A and if, to execute the Stored Procedures, withthe same result, nothing and all happens anymore, neither update onDatabase A and also not on Database B.And also I cant catch the error as the Try/Catch is not working.Hope I could explain it understandable and maybe someone remembersalready having the same problem.Thanks & Best regardsPascal
View 2 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to have a trigger that e-mails systems administrators when a new database is added to SQL Server? If so, what table would need to be watched?
Thanks,
Zakir
Is there a way to determine how many rows were deleted using a database trigger. I reviewed the sys.trigger_events but could not find where you might determine how many rows were deleted.
The Yak Village Idiot
I am just a very beginner on using trigger. I get 2 databases A and B. When there is update on A, a trigger will be made on updating B.
here is the trigger i wrote
CREATE trigger update_master_add_charge on master_addition_charge
for update
as
update B.master_addition_charge
set
(acm_desc=?, curr_id=?, charge=?, acm_flag=?, void_flag=?)
the ? should be the value in A... but what shall i write on that?
Is my query correct?
Thanks
Hi, does anyone know what syntax I have to use if I want to use a trigger to insert into a different database. This is the code I have I'm just not sure how to get it to identify a different database.
CREATE TRIGGER History_replication ON [dbo].[History]
FOR INSERT
AS
INSERT [dbo].[History] (this one shoul dbe on the History_copy db)
(workdone,error)
SELECT workdone,error
FROM [dbo].[History]
Thanks Ed
Hi, I'd like to create a trigger to fire it when database starts up. Is there any way to do it? If yes, would you be able to provide me with an example?
Thanks in advance.
-Alla
I have a requirement. I am having a database which is having views,procedures and tables. Many users are having access to the database. If i want to track all the schema changes happening in the database how to achieve that? As in i have used some tables in a procedure and someone might change the column or drop the column. So it is going to have impacts on my procedure. I need a trigger which tracks all the changes done in a database and the impacts those changes are going to make.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have an Access database with Access front-end to Access back-end.Another company has installed a separate application using SQLServer.At present certain information in the first application is enteredmanually into the second. We wish to automate this process.The other company is proposing that the SQLServer application sets up atrigger on a selected table in the Access backend. When a new recordis added, information can be transferred to the SQLServer.I am interested to know if this is really possible. I have found inBOL that the Access database can be set up as a linked server toSQLServer. Is this way to handle this and is it then possible to setup a trigger?I am not the person who will be doing this but would like to know if itpossible and, in general, how it is done.Jim
View 4 Replies View RelatedHow can i create database level triggers in MS SQL? i m not talkingabout table trigger or view trigger.Khurram.
View 2 Replies View RelatedHi,
I have a database with 10 tables, and I need one trigger to each table that for insert, update and delete, get the registry that is been modified and insert these data in another table...
How can I do that ?
Thanks
Hi there,
Values in my database need to updated periodically. The code, upon starting the application, queries the database and stores the values in the Application collection. This is to avoid making a database call everytime the values are needed (increases performance). The drawback is that changes to the database values are not updated in the code.
How can I create a database trigger that will update the C# Application colllection whenever a table value is updated?
Dear Freinds,
we are having an requirement to log the unauthorized backend update on database.Is there any other way ,apart from going and creating the triggers at each table to log the backend update.
Note :Is Database base level trigger is possible on SQL Server 2000?
Looking for your reply.
With Cheers :beer: ,
Sathesh.M
I want to replace every single 1/1/1900 date I have in my system with null, on an entire database level. I never want them, they cause multiple issues, and I need them gone.
I have made a trigger on a test table that works for inserts, but not updates:
CREATE TRIGGER UpdateDate ON test FOR INSERT AS
IF EXISTS (select * FROM inserted WHERE CheckDate ='1/1/1900')
BEGIN
UPDATE test SET CheckDate=Null
FROM test T INNER JOIN inserted I ON T.AutoID=I.AutoID
WHERE I.CheckDate='1/1/1900'
END
Also, it only works on this table, and the specific field mentioned.
I am looking for a global, databse level trigger that will replace 1/1/1900 with null whenever it appears from an insert, or an update statement.
Im a newbie with a sql table in a MSDE database that contains fields ofCustName, BrokerName, Type, Status.I am trying to write a trigger that does this:1. When a new record in a table is added, I would like the selectedfields to be copied to another table (call it Master).2. If that Master table already contains a record where the CustName =CustName, then simply ignore. If CustName does not match anything, thenadd the record to the Master TableIn other words, I am trying to create a table (or even a new database)that has unique records in it - making a master customer list.Any hints on how to get started on this?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI am looking to create a server wide trigger which will fire whenever a database gets created, I would like to know if there are any gotchas or anything that I need to look out for/test specifically.
The idea is to automatically grant some permissions and take some other actions whenever a database gets created.
I have inherited a database and with it a set of triggers that are 'apparently' installed. However I have a number of different 'versions' for a specific update trigger and it is not clear from the files which is the latest, hence I am unsure of what 'version' of the trigger is installed in the database itself.
I am trying to retrieve the trigger code from the databse so that i can correctly determine which one of my trigger files is the latest version.
I don't want to end up in a situation where an earlier version of the update trigger is installed as this could wreck the underlying data.
I have tried using the syscomments.text column that relates to the trigger but it only gives me a concatenated version of the sql code and not enough to determine which file version was used for the trigger.
Is there a way of retreiving the entire SQL code that was entered rather than just the first few lines?
I want to disable a trigger on a table in a database from inside a stored procedure in another database.
Can I disable then enable? Do I have to drop then recreate the trigger?
How do I code it? I've tried several ways but I can't get it right...
I have two databases one running of MS SQL Server and other on Oracle..
My requirement is such that, I want an trigger to be written on table in MS SQL Server such that it inserts / updates values of tables in Oracle Database tooo..is there any methodology for the same..
regards.
Hello,
Is there a way to trigger the execution of a procedure when a database is created ? We're using this 3rd party system in which you only specify the database server. Whenever the users create a new "Storage Area", the system actually creates a new database.
I need to handle backups for that system so I want to create a procedure that will generate a backup device and backup jobs automatically whenever a database is created.
I will also need 2 procedures to handle database renaming and deletion. I searched around but can't find a way to trigger the execution of my procedures.
Hi
I am building a pretty simple intranet application where we need to be able to track changes to tables. The tracking feature do not need to be very advanced, we just need to see who changed something and what it was. Therefore I decided just to use a trigger based solution, but need some input/advice since my SQL skills is somewhat lacking.
Consider the following (mock-up) schema:
-- My content table
CREATE TABLE [Content](
[ContentGuid] [uniqueidentifier] NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT (newid()),
[Data] [nvarchar](4000) NOT NULL,
[ChangedBy] [nchar](10) NOT NULL,
[MaybeNull] [int] NULL
)
-- My history table
CREATE TABLE [History](
[ChangedTable] [nvarchar](50) NOT NULL,
[ReferenceGuid] [uniqueidentifier] NOT NULL,
[ChangedBy] [nchar](10) NOT NULL,
[ChangedOn] [datetime] NOT NULL DEFAULT (getutcdate()),
[IsDelete] [bit] NOT NULL DEFAULT ((0)),
[Changes] [xml] NOT NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
-- My insert/update trigger
CREATE TRIGGER [RecordChangeOnInsertUpdate]
ON [Content]
AFTER INSERT,UPDATE
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
DECLARE @Changes xml
SET @Changes = (select * from [inserted] for xml raw ('Content'), elements xsinil)
INSERT INTO [History]
([ChangedTable]
,[ReferenceGuid]
,[ChangedBy]
,[ChangedOn]
,[IsDelete]
,[Changes])
SELECT 'Content', ContentGuid, ChangedBy, getutcdate(), 0, @Changes
FROM [inserted]
END
-- My delete trigger
CREATE TRIGGER [RecordChangeOnDelete]
ON [Content]
AFTER DELETE
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
DECLARE @Changes xml
SET @Changes = (select * from [deleted] for xml raw ('Content'), elements xsinil)
INSERT INTO [History]
([ChangedTable]
,[ReferenceGuid]
,[ChangedBy]
,[ChangedOn]
,[IsDelete]
,[Changes])
SELECT 'Content', ContentGuid, ChangedBy, getutcdate(), 1, @Changes
FROM [deleted]
END
I have decided to use the "one history table for all table changes" method. The changes for a row is stored in a xml column which obviously limits the total size of columns in a table being tracked, but that is not a problem in my application. In general I like this set up, since I will be able to change the schema continuously without having to change the triggers, and since the application will probably evolve a lot over the coming months this is pretty important to me.
EDIT: I should add that all the tables I will be tracking have a uniqueidentifier column. This makes it possible to related table rows in the different tables being tracked with their history.
A few concerns with the above SQL:
- Can the inserted/deleted table change between "SET @Changes = (select * ..." and the "INSERT INTO ..." statement, such that the data is not valid? If so, how to work around that?
- If I were to (hypothetically) perform a "UPDATE [Content] SET [Data] = 'something'", not only is my update trigger called once for each row updated, but the XML added to the inserted row in the history table ([History].[Changes]) represent all the rows updated in the batch update. How do I get around this?
Are there any other issues I should be aware of?
Regards, Egil.
I need a trigger to set the creation date of a new record in the database... I tried the following, but it changed all records, not just the new one...
CREATE TRIGGER trgCreationDate
ON [dbo].tabCustomerLookup
FOR INSERT
AS
BEGIN
UPDATE tabCustomerLookup
SET CreationDate = getdate()
END
i have 2 server named A and B
in A server have database server and B have database server
in A have database named A1 with table TA1 and in B have database named B1 with table TB1
i want if i insert data into database A1 table TA1 in server A, database B1 table TB1 in server B will insert the same data to
how can do that with trigger or other ways
thx u
Recently I created a DDL Server-scope trigger using the following:
create trigger stop_alter_database on all server
for ALTER_DATABASE
as
rollback;
print 'database change stopped by stop_alter_database';
go
Then I ran the following script:
alter database [test] modify file (name=test', maxsize=2028mb);
The result was:
Msg 3609, Level 16, State 2, Line 1
The transaction ended in the trigger. The batch has been aborted.
database change stopped by stop_alter_database
The problem is that when I checked the max size of the data file it had changed. So, the statement was never rolled back. Is there something I'm missing because I can't find any documentation or articles that state the inability to rollback alter database statements. Whats going on?
Hi,
We are Using Transactional Replication with Updatable Subscription in SQL Server 2005 SP1.
Subscription Type : Pull Subscription
Mode : Continuous Running Mode
Conflict Resolution Policy : Publisher Wins.
I have a table "Sample" (which is part of replication) and it has got 3 triggers. All the triggers are set NOT FOR REPLICATION.
The first trigger Updates a column of the "Sample" table in which i inserted a record.
The second trigger inserts record in to another database table and also updates a column of the table "Sample".
The third trigger does not affect any tables, it is written for some manipulations with variables.
In this scenario when I insert a record in the Sample table of the subscription database, that record is visible in the table. But during replication, it shows conflict in the Conflict Viewer and removes the record from the Sample table of the subscription database. The record is not replicated to the publisher and the other Subscriber also.
But when I comment any one update in either the first or second trigger, the insert works fine without any conflict.
Is there any issue with firing two triggers in replication which is updating the same table? I also suspect the Order of Commands moving to the Publisher from the MSReplication_Queue table, becoz the conflict viewer shows the subscriber as the Conflict loser.
Is there any issue with msrepl_tran_version, Since the conflict is decided based on this id??
It would be helpful if u could reply soon.
Thanks and Regards,
Swapna.B.
Trying to find tsql for TRIGGER which will send me email, if someone rename database in test/dev environment. I found it for CREATE and DROP database trigger but could not find for RENAME database.
View 8 Replies View RelatedHello. is there an event that exists for server level triggers when a database restore occurs? I don't see restore_database as an option in BOL... I DO see
CREATE_DATABASE
ALTER_DATABASE
DROP_DATABASE
Any way to fire a server trigger on a database restore?
We're capturing the other server events but would like to also log and be notified of database restores. Thanks, Bruce
I need to come up with a script that when executed it will create a stored procedure and trigger along with permissions. Is there a way to make this into a package. Any ideas?
View 3 Replies View RelatedOK, I know about this: [URL] ....
But the script has "ALL SERVER".
What I want is a trigger that is specific to my DB called "JunkStuff". I only want to block a servername from connect to my super dooper DB "JunkStuff".
It used to be so simple in SQL 2008.
With SSDT and VS2012, it seems impossible.
I created the project and I added a trigger
public
partialclassTrigger
{
[Microsoft.SqlServer.Server.
SqlTrigger(Name =
"myPM10000", Target
= "[dbo].[PM10000]",
Event = "FOR UPDATE, INSERT")]
publicstaticvoidmyPM10000()
etc.
When I try to build the project it fails:
Error 1 SQL71561: Trigger: [dbo].[myPM10000] has an unresolved reference to object [dbo].[PM10000]. D:ProjectsVS2013myproject_CLRobjDebugmyproject_CLR.generated.sql 8 32 myproject_CLR
I have tried with and without adding a database reference. With the reference all I accomplish is lost time waiting for that monster link to the database to generate. There has to be a way to make this happen, right? I don't want to have to rewrite this in Transact SQL.
I need to deploy the trigger in database whenever new DB is creating on the server.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have 2 dbs (SQL 2012) - one contains a trigger that is enabled/disabled by a procedure in the other database. This all works fine.
If I create a Database Project solution in Visual Studio 2012 SSDT (or 2013) for both databases, the stored procedure generates a SQL71502 stating that my trigger name can't be resolved.
To recreate the issue:
CREATE DATABASE DbWithTrigger
GO
USE DbWithTrigger
GO
CREATE TABLE dbo.TblWithTrigger(
Id int NULL,
SomeValue varchar(30) NULL
[code]....
-- Test to confirm
EXEC CrossDbTriggerCall
INSERT DbWithTrigger.dbo.TblWithTrigger VALUES(1, 'Blah blah')
In Visual Studio 2012:
1. Create a new solution with a project named DbWithTrigger
2. In project settings set the Target platform to SQL 2012
2. Import the DbWithTrigger db into this project
3. Create a new project named DbCallsTrigger
4. In project settings set the Target platform to SQL 2012
5. Import the DbCallsTrigger db into this project
6. Add a Database Reference in DbCallsTrigger for DbWithTrigger
When you build the solution both dbs build successfully, however there are two warnings. One is easily resolved by replacing DbWithTrigger in the body of the procedure with [$(DbWithTrigger)] (db variable name for the reference) but I can't find out how to get rid of the other. Is it a bug?