DTS Transactions - Error
Mar 9, 2001
I have a DTS package which contains:
- 1 "Execute SQL" task
- 1 "Connection" object
The provider for the connection is SQLOLEDB ("Microsoft OLEDB Provider for SQL Server"), and this works just fine with transactions in ADO etc.
The MDAC version is 2.5, and the SQL Server Client Utils version is 7.0 SP2.
The package properties are set as follows:
- "Use transactions" is on
- "Auto commmit transaction" is on
- "Read committed" isolation level
The execute SQL task has the following workflow properties:
- "Join transaction if present" is on
- "Commit transaction on successful..." is on
- "Rollback transaction on failure" is on
- ("Execute on main package thread" just in case)
When I execute the package (from the designer, or cmd line), I get the following (most informative) error:
"Error Source: Microsoft Data Transformation Services (DTS) Package
Error Description: Unspecified error"
If I change the package properties to remove "Use transactions", it executes just fine.
Any ideas?
TIA
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Aug 21, 2007
Hi,All.
I'm writing test cases on C# for a few methods that make changes in database.To prevent making changes I used BeginTransaction-Rollback,everything was good.But this doesn't work if tested method has BeginTransaction-Rollback code itself.An error appears in NUnit: System.InvalidOperationException : SqlConnection does not support parallel transactions.
Do smb know how to solve the problem?
*******************************tc below********************
[Test]
[Category("Access")]
public void UpdateGroupUserTable(/*Int32 userID, GroupList dataset*/)
{
r.BeginTransaction();
try
{
r.UpdateGroupUserTable(userId,gl);
}
finally
{
r.Rollback();
}
*******************************tested method below********************
public void UpdateGroupUserTable(Int32 userID, GroupList dataset)
{
CheckDisposed();
UpdateCommand.CommandType = CommandType.Text;
UpdateCommand.Parameters.Clear();
UpdateCommand.Parameters.Add("@USERID", userID);
BeginTransaction();
try
{
Adapter.Update(dataset.acl_group);
Commit();
}
catch (SqlException)
{
Rollback();
throw;
}
}
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 17, 2008
So I have a few data flow tasks that I need to all execute successfully before I commit the changes. So I use a few nested sequence containers with the parent set to Required and all of the children set to Supported. This should work right? Instead I get "The AcquireConnection method call to the connection manager "Databasenamehere" failed with error code 0xC0202009. If I switch the parent back to Supported or NotSupported it will execute fine.
HELP!
Thanks in advance!
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2005
Hi there,
I have decided to move all my transaction handling from asp.net to stored procedures in a SQL Server 2000 database. I know the database is capable of rolling back the transactions just like myTransaction.Rollback() in asp.net. But what about exceptions? In asp.net, I am used to doing the following:
<code>Try 'execute commands myTransaction.Commit()Catch ex As Exception Response.Write(ex.Message) myTransaction.Rollback()End Try</code>Will the database inform me of any exceptions (and their messages)? Do I need to put anything explicit in my stored procedure other than rollback transaction?
Any help is greatly appreciated
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 17, 2006
This is my code in vb.net with Sql transactionI am using insertcommand and update command for executing the sqlqueryin consecutive transactions as follows.How can I achive parallel transactions in sql------------------start of code---------------------trybID = Convert.ToInt32(Session("batchID")) strSQL = "" strSQL = "Insert into sessiondelayed (batchid,ActualEndDate) values (" & bID & ",'" & Format(d1, "MM/dd/yyyy") & "')"
sqlCon = New System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection(ConfigurationSettings.AppSettings("conString"))
Dim s1 As String = sqlCon.ConnectionString.ToString sqlDaEndDate = New System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataAdapter("Select * from sessiondelayed", sqlCon) dsEndDate = New DataSet sqlDaEndDate.Fill(dsEndDate)
dbcommandBuilder = New SqlClient.SqlCommandBuilder(sqlDaEndDate)
'sqlCon.BeginTransaction() 'sqlDaEndDate.InsertCommand.Transaction = tr If sqlCon.State = ConnectionState.Closed Then sqlCon.Open() End If sqlDaEndDate.InsertCommand = sqlCon.CreateCommand() tr = sqlCon.BeginTransaction(IsolationLevel.ReadCommitted) sqlDaEndDate.InsertCommand.Connection = sqlCon sqlDaEndDate.InsertCommand.Transaction = tr sqlDaEndDate.InsertCommand.CommandText = strSQL sqlDaEndDate.InsertCommand.CommandType = CommandType.Text
sqlDaEndDate.InsertCommand.ExecuteNonQuery() tr.Commit() sqlDaEndDate.Update(dsEndDate) sqlCon.Close() End If Catch es As Exception
Dim s2 As String = es.Message If sqlCon.State = ConnectionState.Closed Then sqlCon.Open() End If strSQL = " update SessionDelayed set ActualEndDate= '" & Format(d1, "MM/dd/yyyy") & "' where batchid=" & bID & "" sqlDaEndDate.UpdateCommand = sqlCon.CreateCommand() tr1 = sqlCon.BeginTransaction(IsolationLevel.ReadCommitted) sqlDaEndDate.UpdateCommand.Connection = sqlCon sqlDaEndDate.UpdateCommand.Transaction = tr1 sqlDaEndDate.UpdateCommand.CommandText = strSQL sqlDaEndDate.UpdateCommand.CommandType = CommandType.Text sqlDaEndDate.UpdateCommand.ExecuteNonQuery() tr1.Commit() sqlDaEndDate.Update(dsEndDate) sqlCon.Close()
End Try
'-------------End----------------
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 2, 2007
Greetings,
We are using peer-to-peer transactional replication. When using the default agent profile, the replicator stops processing commands when it encounters an error. It appears to keep trying to apply the command that caused the error and essentially hangs on that command. We have changed our agent profiles to "Continue on data consistency errors" - not the kind of option to give you a warm fuzzy feeling but we just don't know what else to do.
Where are the commands that cause errors stored within the replication environment? Can they be individually viewed, edited, and/or deleted? We would like some alternative to "continue on data consistency errors."
Thanks,
BCB
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 14, 2007
Hi, I am working on vs2005 with sql server 2000. I have used TransactionScope class. Example Reference: http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/UploadFile/mosessaur/TransactionScope04142006103850AM/TransactionScope.aspx The code is given below. using System.Transactions; protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { System.Transactions.TransactionOptions transOption = new System.Transactions.TransactionOptions(); transOption.IsolationLevel = System.Transactions.IsolationLevel.ReadCommitted; transOption.Timeout = new TimeSpan(0, 2, 0); using (System.Transactions.TransactionScope tranScope = new System.Transactions.TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Required,transOption)) { using (SqlConnection con = new SqlConnection(ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["nwConnString"].ConnectionString)) { int i; con.Open(); SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand("update products set unitsinstock=100 where productid=1", con); i = cmd.ExecuteNonQuery(); if (i > 0) { using (SqlConnection conInner = new SqlConnection(ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["pubsConnString"].ConnectionString)) { conInner.Open(); SqlCommand cmdInner = new SqlCommand("update Salary set sal=5000 where eno=1", conInner); i = cmdInner.ExecuteNonQuery(); if (i > 0) { tranScope.Complete(); // this statement commits the executed query. } } } } // Dispose TransactionScope object, to commit or rollback transaction. } } It gives error like
"The partner transaction manager has disabled its support for remote/network transactions. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x8004D025)" The database I have used is northwind database and pubs database which is by default in sql server 2000. So, Kindly let me know how to proceed further. Thanks in advance,Arun.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 22, 2007
I am having a problem getting error rows to redirect between an OLE DB Source and an OLE DB Destination when using transactions. Each time I turn on the transaction control I get an error stating:
"[OLE DB Destination [48]] Error: The input "OLE DB Destination Input" (61) cannot be set to redirect on error using a connection in a transaction."
I get the above Error when using MSDTC. I have the data flow inside of a Sequence Container with the transaction option set to REQUIRED and the Isolation Level set to Serializable. I have tried all the Isolation levels.
I have the error rows piped off to a seperate OLE DB Destination. I have also tried using native SQL transactions with Execute SQL tasks to BEGIN, COMMIT or ROLLBACK the transaction. This does not work either. It looks like it works properly when the data flow is successful but using profiler I can see SSIS opens up a seperate process for the BEGIN and then another one with the Data Flow task. When I intentionally fail the Data Flow the Rollback always fails. I made sure I had RetainSameConnection turned on for the Connection I was using.
I am speculating that the Data Flow does not know what to Rollback the actual rows that succeeded or the error rows that are getting piped off.
I am fairly stumped on this one so any help is appreciated.
Thanks
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 14, 2006
I'm receiving the below error when trying to implement Execute SQL Task.
"The ROLLBACK TRANSACTION request has no corresponding BEGIN TRANSACTION." This error also happens on COMMIT as well and there is a preceding Execute SQL Task with BEGIN TRANSACTION tranname WITH MARK 'tran'
I know I can change the transaction option property from "supported" to "required" however I want to mark the transaction. I was copying the way Import/Export Wizard does it however I'm unable to figure out why it works and why mine doesn't work.
Anyone know of the reason?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 13, 2003
Hi All,
Can anybody suggest me a website where I can find articles on Managing transactions with Sql server. Also a scenario where the transactions take place in a environment involving 2 different databases, Like the bank account and credit card transactions (specifically of 2 way kind)
Thanks
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 6, 2005
I have a web application with a shopping cart, how do I stop all the shopping cart transaction from going into the db log? Is this possible? These are are only transient data movements, and will never be need to to restore to, and they are cause log bloat. Or is there a better way to stop log bloat?
Thanks
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 17, 2000
Hi All,
How can we change connection properties in a DTS pkg with connection?
You can loop through the connection count but the connection ID is not static one.So can’t rely on that.
Is there another way of changing connection properties?
Thanks in Advance
Barath
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 5, 2000
Hi all....
I am currently designing a DTS Package to import data that is processed daily into a large database.
I have to design the package such that if any step fails when importing, I roll back the entire transaction.
I have designed the package with this in mind, checked "join transaction if present" and "rollback transaction on failure" in all of the workflows. I have also made all workflows serialized.
However, when I run the package, it fails on one of the data pumps with the error:
Transaction context in use by another session.
Any ideas?
Thank you,
Brian
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 1, 2000
I am replicating (finally!!) and on my publishers agent history I can see it says xx transactions with xx commands were delivered. (xx being the number)
Where can I look to see what the transactions or commands are?
Is there a place the system stores this information?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 17, 2003
what is maximum limit of no. of transactions per sec. in sql server 2000
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 6, 2004
Is there a point to wrapping a single UPDATE or INSERT statement in an explicit TRANSACTION:
BEGIN TRANSACTION
INSERT INTO Table (...) VALUES (...)
COMMIT TRANSACTION
I understand ACID and concept of transactions. However, I thought they were only necessary for multi-statement operations. I'm maintaining code that does this and am wondering if this is necessary. Does SQL Server guarantee ACID for single statements? Are single UPDATE/INSERT statements prone to race condition like affects without using explicit transactions?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 17, 2008
Are there any scenarios where an un-commited transaction would block further queries?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 27, 2008
If you run the Begin Transaction code and then run a create such as an update query and you see that it effects the number of rows that you wanted it to effect is there a way to look at the actual data that changed before you Commit Transaction?
Thanks!
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jul 1, 2007
I have a table with around 240 columns and one of the column in the Table is the Inserttime ( DATETIME ) and I using a GETDATE() function in the stored Proc, when we insert data into the table. In the same Milli second 2007-06-27 09:32:58.303 , I have around 7600 records in the database. The Stored Proc is called for each Individual record and we don't bunch the transactions. Is this possible.
I did some bench marking on this server and I can insert only 700 - 800 records approx / sec on this particular table.
Thanks
View 6 Replies
View Related
Aug 1, 2007
I have a small database that I have been testing.I get an error about a transaction deadlock.The code is in stored procedures and I added transactions to the sp'sbut the error happened again.I wrapped the whole sp in just one transaction and I don't have anyindex on the tables.When I test just by running a program that sends 3 calls at a time itwill get a deadlocked transaction as I send 6 or 9 at a time.I am not sure how it can have a deadlocked transaction after I usedtransactions(begin and commit) in the sp's.Steve
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 8, 2007
I am working with transactions and use try catch to capture errors and in the event of an error i have to rollback the transaction. How can i perform this?, most of the errors which i forsee are either insertion of null values into non nullable columns or violation of Primary keys while inserting duplicates.
I started by coding the following way but it does not rollaback apparently the try catch does not work for above kind of errors..Can somebody help..
DECLARE @REPORTING_PERIOD VARCHAR(6)
BEGIN TRY
BEGIN TRANSACTION
-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
-- interfering with SELECT statements.
SET NOCOUNT ON;
SET @REPORTING_PERIOD =(Select REPORT_PERIOD_ID from dbo.T_REPORT_PERIOD where C_FLAG_ACTIVITY=1)
--Step 1
INSERT INTO [dbo].[T_COUNTRIES]
([C_COUNTRY]
,[LB_COUNTRY]
,[C_REGION]
,[FK_REPORTING_PERIOD])
SELECT [C_COUNTRY]
,[LB_COUNTRY]
,[C_REGION]
,@REPORTING_PERIOD
FROM [dbo].[IN_T_COUNTRIES]
--Step 2
INSERT INTO [dbo].[T_FLE]
([FK_P_FLE]
,[C_COSMOS]
,[LB_FLE]
,[C_PARETO]
,[C_OPCO_SCOPE]
,[C_LEVEL]
,[C_FLE_TYPE]
,[C_ACTIVITY]
,[F_MATERIAL]
,[C_MATERIAL_PRIORITY]
,[C_CALCULATION_METHOD]
,[F_CREDIT_RISK_MATERIALITY]
,[V_PARTICIPATION]
,[FK_REPORTING_PERIOD])
SELECT Null as [FK_P_FLE]
,[C_COSMOS]
,[LB_FLE]
,[C_PARETO]
,[C_OPCO_SCOPE]
,[C_LEVEL]
,[C_FLE_TYPE]
,@REPORTING_PERIOD
FROM [dbo].[IN_T_FLE]
COMMIT TRANSACTION
END TRY
BEGIN CATCH
SELECT
ERROR_NUMBER() as ErrorNumber,
ERROR_LINE() as ErrorLine,
ERROR_MESSAGE() as ErrorMessage;
-- Test XACT_STATE for 1 or -1.
-- XACT_STATE = 0 means there is no transaction and
-- a commit or rollback operation would generate an error.
-- Test whether the transaction is uncommittable.
IF (XACT_STATE()) = -1
BEGIN
PRINT
N'The transaction is in an uncommittable state. ' +
'Rolling back transaction.'
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION;
END;
-- Test whether the transaction is active and valid.
IF (XACT_STATE()) = 1
BEGIN
PRINT
N'The transaction is committable. ' +
'Committing transaction.'
COMMIT TRANSACTION;
END;
END CATCH;
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 8, 2006
Hello All,
When i am working with Transactions i got one doubt.
If i am inserting any records into a table with primary key if a transaction is rolled back i am finding one primary ID is missing. Is it so.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 2, 2007
I've been searching around and haven't found anything that simply states what I want to know.
I want to use a transaction within my CLR Stored Proc, to do so I've got System.Transactions referenced and I can access the current transaction via Transaction.Current.
My questions are
Will there always be a current transaction?
Do I need to create a new transaction if one doesn't already exist?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 4, 2006
Hi world:
I have this issue:
I need to push rows from CE to SQL Server 2000 and after delete these rows of CE database only if all rows have been sent to SQL Server 2000.
I think the best is work with transactions. Since I know I can use transactions for this purpose, can anybody give me a link with push transaction examples ?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Dec 17, 2007
Hi all,
What does "Transactions/sec" counter in SQL 2005 under databases do in terms of performance. My counter shows almost 100% all the time in 4 terrbyte DB in superdome with many CPUs.
Which is the optimal value for this counter?
thanks in advance
Priw
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 31, 2008
Hi,
I am using C#.NET 2005, SQL Server 2000.
I have a few questions to ask. Firstly, can anybody help me by telling the difference between the code below and the same code with comments removed:
string localquery = "select bla bla"; SqlDataAdapter _sda; DataTable _dt; SqlCommand _cmd; bool isErrCatched = false; Exception ExcToThrow = new Exception(); using (SqlConnection _cn = NewConnection) // NewConnection returns a static SQLConnection object { _cn.Open(); _cmd = new SqlCommand(localquery, _cn); //SqlTransaction myTrans; //myTrans = _cn.BeginTransaction(); //_cmd.Transaction = myTrans; _dt = new DataTable(); _sda = new SqlDataAdapter(_cmd); try { _sda.Fill(_dt); _sda.Dispose(); //myTrans.Commit(); } catch (Exception exc) { //try { myTrans.Rollback(); } catch {} isErrCatched = true; ExcToThrow = exc; } finally { _cn.Close(); } _cmd.Dispose(); } _cmd = null; if (isErrCatched) throw ExcToThrow; return _dt;
My first question: Can there be a performance loss if I uncomment the lines about transaction usage? I mean, when I do this I start to get more timeouts.
My problem goes on. When I comment those lines and run a stress tool, I am getting "column X does not belong to table Y" errors. If those lines are not commented i am not getting this error, but I get timeout errors frequently. So, my second question: is there something wrong in my query or is there a bad coding practice I am following? Could someone offer a better and more robust sample for this code block?
By the way, connection pooling is on. And these errors are observed under high loads.
Thanks everybody.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 7, 2006
I have transaction that will run on an hourly bases. I need to make sure that no one will start this transaction while it is running. I just need to know the system table that has all the transaction names in them and check to see if the transaction is running or not. what i am trying to do is not to have locks....just wanting to make sure that no one would run the same transaction twice. does anyone have any idea on how we can do this?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Mar 11, 2008
If you ask a .net developer he would likely say that he uses System.Transactions to manage transactions, a DBA on the other hand places transactions within the T-SQL of stored procedures.
What rules do architects and others, use when determining if the transactions should be placed in:
.net Middle Tier Components using System.Transactions for example.
T-SQL Stored Procedures.
Both .net Middle Tier Components and T-SQL Stored Procedures.
Thanks in advance,
Doug Holland
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 1, 2006
if i have a loop that runs through records in a dataset like thisfor(int i=0;i<ds.Tables[0].Rows.Count;++i) and in this loop i have several sql commands that run as a transaction in a try / catch block like : try{ // do stuff}catch{ trans.RollBack();}how can i keep the loop going even if a transaction failed. So the transaction works for each individual row. if row 100 fails for whatever i would like the loop to continue running, do i just simply remove the "throw" and it will continue looping ? my catch block currently looks like catch(Exception ex){transaction.Rollback();activity.Log("Transaction aborted, rolling back. Error Message: " + ex.Message + " Stack Trace: " + ex.StackTrace.ToString());throw; }thanks,mcm
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 3, 2006
I have a class that use a TransactionScope object for make make two operations into a database. The problem is that in a computer works well but in another I receive a error message: "MSDTC is not running in .SQLEXPRESS". I had watched the services in the computer and the "Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator" is running.
Does somebody know what is happening?
Thankyou and sorry for my English.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2007
I am using ADO.Net for data access and was wondering if anyone knows a good resource for information of sql transactions? Also, do you know if the ForEach statement can be made in sql transactions?
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 14, 2007
hi all,
i'm developing a WebApplication with VisualStudio2005 (with C# code).i've defined a DataSet with some TableAdatpter. For each TableAdapter, i've definet some "customized" commands, performing specialized operations over the table on DB. (db is SqlServer2000).For each TableAdapter, i've set as "public" the connection, so that i can use it within my code for beginning a new transaction. Now, how can i set that transaction, to the specialized commands I defined for each TableAdapter?
Thanks all.Andrea.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 2, 2008
Hi Guys,
Im having trouble stopping a transaction once the result on one or more of my sql statements rolls back the transaction. Take a look at one my first 'IF' statement (below). If the parameter '@Return' is 'False' i want the transaction rolleback and all sql execution to stop. But my problem is the rest of the sql gets executed and i end up getting rubbish data. Im still new to transactions so i think im doing something really wrong. Please take a look at my sql and help me out in what ever way you think is best. thanks in advance.
MattBEGIN TRY
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE
BEGIN TRANSACTION;
BEGIN
DECLARE @Return BIT;
SELECT @Return = (SELECT IsReturnable FROM INVENTORY WHERE InventoryID = 6)
IF (@Return = 'False') ROLLBACK TRANSACTION;
DECLARE @Already_In INT;
SELECT @Already_In = (SELECT ReturnedBy FROM InventoryInUse WHERE (CheckOutNumber = 375))
IF (@Already_In IS NOT NULL) ROLLBACK TRANSACTION;
DECLARE @Outstanding As INT;
SELECT @Outstanding = (SELECT (QtyTaken - 40) AS Outstanding FROM InventoryInUse WHERE (CheckOutNumber = 375));
DECLARE @OutstandingReason As VARCHAR(200);
DECLARE @Get_Person_ID INT;
Select @Get_Person_ID = (SELECT PersonID From [User] WHERE Username = 'matthewsk');
IF (@Outstanding < 0) ROLLBACK TRANSACTION;
ELSE IF (@Outstanding > 0)BEGIN
IF (@OutstandingReason = '') SELECT @RollBack = @RollBack + 1;
UPDATE InventoryInUse SET ReturnedBy = @Get_Person_ID, ReturnDate = GETDATE(), QtyReturned = 40, QtyOutstanding = @Outstanding, WriteOffReason = 'Testing This' WHERE (CheckOutNumber = 375);
UPDATE Inventory SET TotalQty = TotalQty - @Outstanding, QuantityInUse = QuantityInUse - (40 + @Outstanding) WHERE InventoryID = 6;
END;ELSE IF (@Outstanding = 0)
BEGIN
UPDATE InventoryInUse SET ReturnedBy = @Get_Person_ID, ReturnDate = GETDATE(), QtyReturned = 50 WHERE CheckOutNumber = 375;
UPDATE Inventory SET QuantityInUse = QuantityInUse - 50 WHERE InventoryID = 6;
END;
COMMIT TRANSACTION;
END;END TRY
BEGIN CATCH IF (XACT_STATE()) = -1
BEGIN ROLLBACK TRANSACTION;
END;
END CATCH;
View 3 Replies
View Related
