Please see below sample from BOL + sample of execution plane .
I would like to ask what is the way to avoid the optimizer scan tables out of the scope (I would expect that the only table for this query will be SUPPLY1)
Thanks,
Eyal
--This example uses tables named SUPPLY1, SUPPLY2, SUPPLY3, and SUPPLY4, which correspond to the supplier tables from four offices, located in different countries/regions.
USE tempdb
GO
--create the tables and insert the values
CREATE TABLE SUPPLY1 (
supplyID INT PRIMARY KEY CHECK (supplyID BETWEEN 1 and 150),
supplier CHAR(50)
)
CREATE TABLE SUPPLY2 (
supplyID INT PRIMARY KEY CHECK (supplyID BETWEEN 151 and 300),
supplier CHAR(50)
)
CREATE TABLE SUPPLY3 (
supplyID INT PRIMARY KEY CHECK (supplyID BETWEEN 301 and 450),
supplier CHAR(50)
)
CREATE TABLE SUPPLY4 (
supplyID INT PRIMARY KEY CHECK (supplyID BETWEEN 451 and 600),
supplier CHAR(50)
)
GO
--create the view that combines all supplier tables
CREATE VIEW all_supplier_view
AS
SELECT *
FROM SUPPLY1
UNION ALL
SELECT *
FROM SUPPLY2
UNION ALL
SELECT *
FROM SUPPLY3
UNION ALL
SELECT *
FROM SUPPLY4
GO
I have created a horizontal partition view from 4 physical tables. just wondering how the index works in the partition view: 1) If I need to build an index on a column, do I need to build it on all 4 physical tables? or I just build it on the view? or build it on view and 4 physical tables?
2) If I build it on view, and if I add a table into view, do I need to recreate all indices on the view?
I have a partition view named StudentRequest with underlying tables StudentRequest_T1 and StudentRequest_T2.
Primary Key is on NumericSchoolDBN, SchoolYear, TermId, StudentID, CourseCode
Partition View
Create View dbo.StudentRequestPartView with SchemaBinding as Select NumericSchoolDBN, SchoolYear, TermId, StudentID, CourseCode, AssignedCourseCode, AssignedSectionId, LockAssignedRequest, UpdatedByPID, UpdatedDate, CreatedByPID, CreatedDate, AuditCommentId, DebugTrace from dbo.[StudentRequest_T1]
union all
Select NumericSchoolDBN, SchoolYear, TermId, StudentID, CourseCode, AssignedCourseCode, AssignedSectionId, LockAssignedRequest, UpdatedByPID, UpdatedDate, CreatedByPID, CreatedDate, AuditCommentId, DebugTrace from dbo.[StudentRequest_T2] go
Partition Tables
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[StudentRequest_T1]( [NumericSchoolDBN] [int] NOT NULL, [SchoolYear] [smallint] NOT NULL, [TermId] [tinyint] NOT NULL Check ([TermID] = 1), [StudentID] [int] NOT NULL, [CourseCode] [varchar](10) NOT NULL, : )
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[StudentRequest_T2]( [NumericSchoolDBN] [int] NOT NULL, [SchoolYear] [smallint] NOT NULL, [TermId] [tinyint] NOT NULL Check ([TermID] = 2), [StudentID] [int] NOT NULL, [CourseCode] [varchar](10) NOT NULL, : )
I am able to insert, update and delete records in the StudentRequest view using simple DML SQL statements i.e.
e.g. Insert into Student Request (NumericSchoolDBN, SchoolYear, TermId,€¦) Values(12345, 2006, 1,€¦)
Delete from StudentRequest Where NumericSchoolDBN = 12345 and TermId = 1
But when I use complex SQL statements using self-joins€¦
Insert into Student Request (NumericSchoolDBN, SchoolYear, TermId,€¦) Select NumericSchoolDBN, SchoolYear, TermID,€¦. From Student Request sr1 left outer join Student Request sr2 on Sr1.NumericSchoolDBN = Sr1.NumericSchoolDBN and Sr1.SchoolYear = Sr2.SchoolYear and Sr1.TermId = Sr2.TermId and Sr1.StudentID = Sr2.StudentID and Sr1.CourseCode = Sr2.CourseCode
I get the following error and I can€™t seem to find any documentation that this is a limitation!!!...
Msg 4439, Level 16, State 6, Procedure Course_UpdateCoursePromotion, Line 232 Partitioned view 'STARS.dbo.StudentRequest' is not updatable because the source query contains references to partition table '[STARS].[dbo].[StudentRequest_T1]'.
Recently i've been working on a new project that would partition a large table 2 smaller tables. I then create a view to union the 2 smaller tables(table A, B). I've been getting a strange error when i try to update, insert, delete a record through the view. "View needs partitioning column"....i find this strange. Both of my table have a cluster primary key consisting of 3 columns, and one of the 3 columns(date field) consist of a check constraint. The constraint is used to determine what record goes into which table. Am i missing anything else? The really strange part is sometime it works, and sometimes i get the error message.
I have partitions that I have filled with data. I am not trying to figure out exactly how much data the partitions contain, and therefore I will be able to see if any of them are close to hitting their autogrow conditions. If I were looking at a single unpartitioned table, then I could maybe look at the table properties to determine data and index sizes, and compare that to the size of the mdf file size, but for partitions, then I am not sure how I would query this information out. Any pointers on how this information could be queried out of the system?
I have a sql server 7 running on a machine with two disk partitions (D: and E:).
The data files xxx.mdf and xxx.ldf are stored in D:, which has very few space available. I want to copy these files to E: but I get an error saying that it is not possible to change the source file of a database. Is it possible to do it or do i have to create another data file in E: and keep the old one in D:?
I am trying to understand, when would I do a vertical partition in a Dimensional Data Warehouse ? What are the things I need to consider, before I take the decision?
Hi Column with TEXT datatype is not stored in the same data row any way. I am wondering if there is any performance gain to put it in a seperate table. Thanks
Does anyone have a helpful link for using the partition processing data flow task in SSIS? I am trying to process a monthly partition from within my package and am getting the following error:
Error: 0xC113000A Errors in the high-level relational engine. Pipeline processing can only reference a single table in the data source view.
If anyone has used this before and could point me in the right direction, I would appreciate it.
When you load the data into a new partition table, can it to done online without any downtime? because I have few tables that are around 250 gigs and more.
I’m looking for clearity on partition switching. The idea is to use many BULK INSERT statements into table dbo.X_n in parallel and when BULK INSERT for table dbo.X_n is completed, switch dbo.X_n into dbo.bigdaddy. I think this is the fastest way to upload a couple hundred GB of data.
In learning about partition switching (in part) from The Data Loading Performance Guide under Partition SWITCH, I hear the instructions to say copy the main table exactly to become a target. But in that same step (#1), I read that we need to change the default file group of the target (dbo.X_n) from the default file group. Then it says I need to match indexes and lists the filegroup as something we need to match with the main table.
As an overview of the partition switching strategy, I think the whole point of BULK INSERT with partitioning is to have seperate files (in same group) to enable concurrent uploading where each table has its own file. Once the upload is completed to a table (dbo.X_n) then we do the partition switch into the main table (dbo.bigdaddy). The data we just uploaded doesn’t actually move, just the metadata for it.
When I read the instructions linked above, I hear “Don’t have the same filegroup on your target as the main table. You must have the same filegroup on your target as the main table.”
I have a heavy database , More than 100 GB only for six month .every Query on it takes me along time and I dont have enough space to add more indexes.by a way I decided to do partitioning. I create a partition function , on date filed and all Data records per month was appointed to a separate file.And is partitioning only for Future data entry?
I’m looking for clearity on partition switching. The idea is to use many BULK INSERT statements into table dbo.X_n in parallel and when BULK INSERT for table dbo.X_n is completed, switch dbo.X_n into dbo.bigdaddy. I think this is the fastest way to upload a couple hundred GB of data.
In learning about partition switching (in part) from The Data Loading Performance Guide under Partition SWITCH, I hear the instructions to say copy the main table exactly to become a target. But in that same step (#1), I read that we need to change the default file group of the target (dbo.X_n) from the default file group. Then it says I need to match indexes and lists the filegroup as something we need to match with the main table.
As an overview of the partition switching strategy, I think the whole point of BULK INSERT with partitioning is to have seperate files (in same group) to enable concurrent uploading where each table has its own file. Once the upload is completed to a table (dbo.X_n) then we do the partition switch into the main table (dbo.bigdaddy). The data we just uploaded doesn’t actually move, just the metadata for it.
“Don’t have the same filegroup on your target as the main table. You must have the same filegroup on your target as the main table.”
I'm currently stuck with a table that has 350 mil records. Querying this table is insanely slow so I had a better look at existing yearly partitioning. I already managed to partition on a month level which increased the performance/querrying a lot. I did this on the staging table where I used an alter statement to split the 2015 partition by 12 months.
However, in our project we used Data Vault. This means that we have 4 tables (hub, sathub, link, satlink), all carrying 350 mil records. The problem is that altering the partition function does not work. The server cannot handle this action. What the best way is to do this, without having to drop/reload all tables.
I am studying indexes and keys. I have a table that has a fixed width of data to be loaded in the first column which is parsed in a view based on data types within the fixed width specifications.
Example column A: (name phone house cost of house,zipcodecountystatecountry) -a view will later split this large varchar string based column b: is the source filename of the data load (varchar 256) ....
a. would there be a benefit of adding a clustered or nonclustered index (if so which/point in direction on why)
b. is there benefit of making one of these two columns a primary key (millions of records) or for adding a 3rd new column as a pk?
c. view: this parses the data in column a so it ends up looking more like "name phone house cost of house zipcode county state country" each having their own column.
-any pros/cons of adding indexes (if so which) to the view instead of the tables or both for once the data is parsed?
Hi ! I have a textbox and a Search button. When the user inputs a value and press the button, i want a datagrid to be filled. The following code runs: Dim connect As New Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection( _ "Server=SrvnameSQLEXPRESS;Integrated Security=True; UID= ;password= ; database=dtbsname") connect.Open() Dim cmd As New SqlCommand Dim valor As New SqlParameter("@valor", SqlDbType.VarChar, 50) cmd.CommandText = "Ver_Contactos_Reducido" cmd.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure cmd.Connection = connect cmd.Parameters.Add(valor) cmd.Parameters("@valor").Value = texto Dim adapter As New SqlDataAdapter(cmd) Dim ds As New System.Data.DataSet() adapter.Fill(ds) GridViewContactos.DataSource = ds GridViewContactos.DataBind() connect.Close() I drag a datagrid on the page and only changed its Id. Into the SQL database the stored procedure is the following: ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[Ver_Contactos_Reducido] (@Valor VARCHAR(100)) AS BEGIN SET NOCOUNT ON; SELECT NombreRazonSocial, Nombre, Apellido,TelefonoLaboral, Interno, TelefonoCelular, Email1, Organizacion FROM CONTACTOS WHERE NombreRazonSocial = @Valor OR Nombre = @Valor OR Apellido = @Valor OR TelefonoLaboral = @Valor OR Interno = @Valor OR TelefonoCelular =@Valor OR Email1 = @Valor OR Organizacion= @Valor END When i run the page i can't see the datagrid, and after i enter a text and press the button, nothing happens. What am i doing wrong?? Thks!!
I have a view that give me the data of all the batched. Now I am using a query on view to get a single batched data. when I am using direct query it was taking 0 sec but when I am using Through view "select * from myView where batched=2" then its taking 30 mnt.
Is there a way of changing the value of a column in a view? For example, I have a table with defect code and a description (other columns as well). In a view, I would like to see only the defect code and the description, but if the code is > 90, I would like to define what the description is.
create view SomeView as select * from SomeTable where SomeField > 0
I later modified the table to include more fields INTERSPERSED among the previous ones. I noticed that if I didn't recreate the view, the data was shifted if I used a select statement to query the view. I had dates associated with field names where there should be varchars, FirstNames became addresses, etc. Without naming each field in the select statement, does anyone know of a better way to create a view so that you don't have to remember which views do a "select *"?
Hello, I am trying to add a View to an existing publication and it the subscribers (all devices with SQL CE) don't get the View after replication. I have deleted and recreated the publication, and only the tables will appear on the device, not the view.
Also, I want the data from the view to be dynamic, filtered by using the Host_Name() function/value. Will this work for a View?
Hello everyone, Can someone help me with updating data into a view using triggers? I am struggling hard to write a trigger or stored procedure to update the values on the base tables of the view. Please help me out... Thanks, Godwin
I want a report in excel from my SQL database from one table. I wantto create a view and then use DTS package to export it to excelformat.But how can i get the following format in a view?? They should begrouped by date.Date Column 1 column 2 column 329/10/2003 one $30.00 somedatetwo $45.00 somedata2three $67.00 somedata3Total ******** $142.0030/1/2003 blah blah blahblah blah blahand so on . How can i get such a format in a view.Thanks in advance. I can't use SHAPE command in view i guess.
FROM LoanApplication INNER JOIN Member ON LoanApplication.MemberFK = Member.Id AND LoanApplication.Id = Member.LastLoanApplicationFK INNER JOIN Rate ON LoanApplication.RateFK = Rate.Id
There are realtionships of LoanApplication table with Rate and Member tables. But there is no relationship between Rate and Member. When Rate table is included in the query, problem happens. When It is excluded , I can view the data in the report.