Database Level Lock

Aug 3, 2006

Hi,

How do I lock entire database? I want an exclusive lock on the db by
a user
who is the dbo of that database only (not sa
user).

The
scenario is we have a web application and each week we need to do data
uploads (with etl). During this upload, the users accessing the website
should not be able to read data. This is why I want database lock.

Now
the catch here is, the application access the data using user say abc.
Abc is dbo for that database and the etl is also done by abc login. So
will db locking help in this case as the website can also read the data
being a abc user?

Thanks,
Tanmaya

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Conditional Split For Insert Or Update Cause Dead Lock On Database Level

Aug 28, 2007

Hi

I am using conditional split Checking to see if a record exists and if so update else insert. But this cause database dead lock any one has suggestion?

Thanks

View 7 Replies View Related

Row Level Lock In Sql Server 2000

Feb 23, 2006

Devteam writes "Hi,
WIndows version 5.0 (SP4)
I am using sql server 2000. in our application i am using simple select statement to retrieve the value from the database. Sometime the same query is accessed i did not get the result.i have tried to run the same query using query analyzer. but the query is keep on running. at the same time when accessing other rows in the table, it gets retrieve the values.

what is the problem here... is there anything locked that the row before executing the select statement.
if there is any lock is present then how to identify it and also how to prevent a row from locking... if the lock is occured then the other transactions also not executed. why the lock is placed in the first place."

View 1 Replies View Related

Column Level Or Database Level Encryption/decryption....

Jan 16, 2008

I want to perform column level and database level encryption/decryption....
Does any body have that code written in C# or VB.NET for AES-128, AES-192, AES-256  algorithms...
I have got code for single string... but i want to encrypt/decrypt columns and sometimes the whole database...
Can anybody help me out...
If you have Store procedure in SQL for the same then also it ll do...
Thanks in advance

View 1 Replies View Related

The SSE Provider Did Not Find The Database File Specified In The Connection String. At The Configured Trust Level (below High Trust Level), The SSE Provider Can Not Automatically Create The Database File.

Aug 31, 2007

The problem that I am having is that with Visual Web Developer I am creating a webpage and having it directly put online, so for example when I start a new ASP.NET page, I select the location to be HTTP, with the location http://MYWEBSERVER/Website   and for the language and Visual BasicI notice a couple of things, first that there is no longer a a link under the Main toolbar "Website" selection called the ASP.NET configuration.  So how can I configure what I want to have users be able to do?  It seems that this choice is only available if I am building the ASP.NET page on my "localhost".  So that is the first problem.  So I am able to get the pages to work, atleast the things such as the textboxes to show up etc, (Even things as advanced as the "Login" box).  How ever when I try to get someone to try to login  I am taken to a page that has an server error.  The error is:
"The SSE Provider did not find the database file specified in the connection string. At the configured trust level (below High trust level), the SSE provider can not automatically create the database file. "
The Stack Trace Errors are at the bottom.  I think this is happening because the automatically generated databases are not getting built online as they are on my computer.  On my computer I have MSSQL express.  So either the databases are not getting built for some reason, (and I think that is the case as I don't see any in the folder).  So I think that somehow I have to create a database on my server, and then somehow configure the ASP.NET file, perhaps in the Web.Config file to look for that new database.  Is this the correct methodology?   Is there some simpler way that I can just somehow upload things as they are and have them work correctly on my server?   The error says that either the Server did not find the database or that the trust level was insufficient.  I don't think that is it as I just looked again and I don't see any .MDF files.  So how would I go about getting this to work right? Is there a way to do this with MySQL also?  So that I don't have to use MSSQL?  My server only allows 1 DataBase for that.
Thanks and I hope my question makes sense.  It is basically how can I get it to be able to create and check users etc. online?
Brian
[ProviderException: The SSE Provider did not find the database file specified in the connection string. At the configured trust level (below High trust level), the SSE provider can not automatically create the database file.]   System.Web.DataAccess.SqlConnectionHelper.EnsureSqlExpressDBFile(String connectionString) +2555237   System.Web.DataAccess.SqlConnectionHelper.GetConnection(String connectionString, Boolean revertImpersonation) +87   System.Web.Security.SqlMembershipProvider.GetPasswordWithFormat(String username, Boolean updateLastLoginActivityDate, Int32& status, String& password, Int32& passwordFormat, String& passwordSalt, Int32& failedPasswordAttemptCount, Int32& failedPasswordAnswerAttemptCount, Boolean& isApproved, DateTime& lastLoginDate, DateTime& lastActivityDate) +1121   System.Web.Security.SqlMembershipProvider.CheckPassword(String username, String password, Boolean updateLastLoginActivityDate, Boolean failIfNotApproved, String& salt, Int32& passwordFormat) +105   System.Web.Security.SqlMembershipProvider.CheckPassword(String username, String password, Boolean updateLastLoginActivityDate, Boolean failIfNotApproved) +42   System.Web.Security.SqlMembershipProvider.ValidateUser(String username, String password) +83   System.Web.UI.WebControls.Login.OnAuthenticate(AuthenticateEventArgs e) +160   System.Web.UI.WebControls.Login.AttemptLogin() +105   System.Web.UI.WebControls.Login.OnBubbleEvent(Object source, EventArgs e) +99   System.Web.UI.Control.RaiseBubbleEvent(Object source, EventArgs args) +35   System.Web.UI.WebControls.Button.OnCommand(CommandEventArgs e) +115   System.Web.UI.WebControls.Button.RaisePostBackEvent(String eventArgument) +163   System.Web.UI.WebControls.Button.System.Web.UI.IPostBackEventHandler.RaisePostBackEvent(String eventArgument) +7   System.Web.UI.Page.RaisePostBackEvent(IPostBackEventHandler sourceControl, String eventArgument) +11   System.Web.UI.Page.RaisePostBackEvent(NameValueCollection postData) +33   System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +5102
 

View 1 Replies View Related

Error: A Deadlock Was Detected While Trying To Lock Variable X For Read Access. A Lock Could Not Be Acquired After 16 Attempts

Feb 2, 2007

I simply made my script task (or any other task) fail

In my package error handler i have a Exec SQL task - for Stored Proc

SP statement is set in following expression (works fine in design time):

"EXEC [dbo].[us_sp_Insert_STG_FEED_EVENT_LOG] @FEED_ID= " + (DT_WSTR,10) @[User::FEED_ID] + ", @FEED_EVENT_LOG_TYPE_ID = 3, @STARTED_ON = '"+(DT_WSTR,30)@[System::StartTime] +"', @ENDED_ON = NULL, @message = 'Package failed. ErrorCode: "+(DT_WSTR,10)@[System::ErrorCode]+" ErrorMsg: "+@[System::ErrorDescription]+"', @FILES_PROCESSED = '" + @[User::t_ProcessedFiles] + "', @PKG_EXECUTION_ID = '" + @[System::ExecutionInstanceGUID] + "'"

From progress:

Error: The Script returned a failure result.
Task SCR REIL Data failed

OnError - Task SQL Insert Error Msg
Error: A deadlock was detected while trying to lock variable "System::ErrorCode, System::ErrorDescription, System::ExecutionInstanceGUID, System::StartTime, User::FEED_ID, User::t_ProcessedFiles" for read access. A lock could not be acquired after 16 attempts and timed out.
Error: The expression ""EXEC [dbo].[us_sp_Insert_STG_FEED_EVENT_LOG] @FEED_ID= " + (DT_WSTR,10) @[User::FEED_ID] + ", @FEED_EVENT_LOG_TYPE_ID = 3, @STARTED_ON = '"+(DT_WSTR,30)@[System::StartTime] +"', @ENDED_ON = NULL, @message = 'Package failed. ErrorCode: "+(DT_WSTR,10)@[System::ErrorCode]+" ErrorMsg: "+@[System::ErrorDescription]+"', @FILES_PROCESSED = '" + @[User::t_ProcessedFiles] + "', @PKG_EXECUTION_ID = '" + @[System::ExecutionInstanceGUID] + "'"" on property "SqlStatementSource" cannot be evaluated. Modify the expression to be valid.

Warning: The Execution method succeeded, but the number of errors raised (4) reached the maximum allowed (1); resulting in failure. This occurs when the number of errors reaches the number specified in MaximumErrorCount. Change the MaximumErrorCount or fix the errors.

And how did I get 4 errors? - I only set my script task result to failure

View 11 Replies View Related

SQL Security :: ALTER DATABASE Failed Because A Lock Could Not Be Placed On Database

Jul 20, 2015

I have a script that automates some db drop/restore operations and bringing the database to single user mode is part of it: ALTER DATABASE ... SET SINGLE_USER WITH ROLLBACK IMMEDIATE...I want this to executes under a login, that has restricted privileges, so I've created a login and granted it a dbcreator role + ALTER ANY DATABASE privileges.

Problem: When I run the script against a database with an active/sleeping connection:It fails when using the restricted login: "Msg 5061...ALTER DATA BASE failed because a lock could not be placed on database ..."It completes successfully when using a sysadmin login According to stackoverflow.com the solution is to kill the active/sleeping connections to the database, before ALTER-ing it, which works fine, but the question is....

Questions: Why the "ALTER DATABASE..." statement works under the sysadmin login, but not under a dbcreator one?Does this mean the sysadmin login kills the connections to the target database in the background?Is it possible to grant additional privileges to the restricted login, so the "ALTER DATABASE..." statement won't need preventive killing of the connections?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cannot Put Database In Offline Mode Because Lock Could Not Be Placed On Database

Sep 12, 2011

One annoying problem has occurred....I want to put database in offline mode....but it is giving me some error...

"ALTER DATABASE failed because a lock could not be placed on database [database]. Try again later. ALTER DATABASE statement failed. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 5061)" ...

View 7 Replies View Related

Database Lock

Jul 24, 2000

I am using SQL Server 6.5 and this database has 50 database tables and each table has 10000 records in it. So, in short it is very big database. Very often I get the "Database Lock" problem. I tried to tune the database but no help. Is it like that if I upgrade SQL Server 6.5 to SQL Server 7.0, will it help me ? If yes, how ?

View 1 Replies View Related

Lock Database

Jan 29, 2004

In my system I got a problem.
One of the database's Tables are not getting opened and I can not even alter a Stored Procedure which is related to the tables of that database.
How can I solve that?
Subhasish

View 4 Replies View Related

Lock A Row In The Database

Mar 23, 2007

Hello,

I created a form that retrieve a number from a database. Can I lock that record so that other people cannot access it?

Similar to "lock" function in Visual Fox Pro database.

Best regards,
Tee Song Yann

View 9 Replies View Related

Row Lock Versus Page Lock In SQL 2000.

Apr 7, 2004

Hi
We are facing an acute situation in our web-application. Technology is ASP.NEt/VB.NET, SQL Server 2000.

Consider a scenario in which User 1 is clicking on a button which calls a SQL stored procedure. This procedure selects Group A of records of Database Page1.

At the same time if User 2 also clicks the same button which calls same SQL stored procedure. This procedure selects Group B of records of Database Page1.

So, its the same Page1 but different sets of records. At this moment, both the calls have shared locked on the Page1 inside the procedure.

Now, in call 1, inside the procedure after selecting Group A of records, the next statement is and update to those records. As soon as update statement executes, SQL Server throws a deadlock exception as follows :

Transaction (Process ID 78) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction

We are able to understand why its happening. Its because, Group A and Group B of records are on the same Page1. But both the users have shared lock on the Page1. So, no one gets the exclusive lock in records for update, even though, the records are different.

How can I resolve this issue? How can I get lock on wanted rows instead of entire page?

Please advice. Thanks a bunch.

Pankaj

View 1 Replies View Related

Database Lock! Urgent Please!

Mar 10, 2004

Hello folks!
I'm with two locks on a database and I can't access others databases too, except the master.

I've tryed to kill the lock, but I didn't have sucess.

Please help me!!!
Cheers!
Rafael

SPID DBID OBJID INDID TYPE MODE STATUS
9500DBS GRANT
9500DB X GRANT
511855753430TAB IS GRANT

View 8 Replies View Related

Lock Database To Update

Feb 21, 2006

Hi,I need to lock a database (prevent users from connecting) in order toupdate it. I already know how to kick everyone out with their spid buti can't figure how to prevent them from reconnecting.Thanks !

View 5 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2008 :: Script To List All Database Level Permissions In A Database?

Aug 4, 2015

I found this script online..

SELECT prin.[name] [User], sec.state_desc + ' ' + sec.permission_name [Permission]
FROM [sys].[database_permissions] sec
JOIN [sys].[database_principals] prin
ON sec.[grantee_principal_id] = prin.[principal_id]
WHERE sec.class = 0
ORDER BY [User], [Permission];

but the results are this: 2 columns - User and Permission

User Permission
User1 GRANT CONNECT
User2 GRANT CONNECT

IS there a way in SQL Server (2005/2008/2012) to run a script against a Database that will show all users that have permissions to that Database and the type of permissions?

View 7 Replies View Related

Scan Lock On Suspect Database

Mar 11, 2008

i keep getting an error when trying to move some data out of a suspect database i switched to recovery mode.

any ideas on how to get the data moved?


select * into test.dbo.mailable_new from response.dbo.mailable


Server: Msg 601, Level 12, State 3, Line 2
Could not continue scan with NOLOCK due to data movement.

Thanks!

View 5 Replies View Related

Should I Add Lock Statements To My Database Write Querys

Jun 5, 2008

Hello,Could some clarify for me? I’ve been told that I should add  lock statements  to my database write querys (update, delete, insert). I’m not sure If it’s necessary though. The only documentation I’ve found so far is how to implement a lock statement with threading but I’m not using the threading namespace. What best practice and how would I implement this without threading or should I be using threading?Thanks in advance!
 

View 4 Replies View Related

Xp_cmdshell Command Causing Database To Lock-up

Nov 26, 2002

I am in the process of writing a stored procedure that takes data from a table, within a cursor, and puts that data to the network server via the xp_cmdshell procedure. The xp_cmdshell command is at the end of the cursor in the SP.

I have worked with the admins on getting the proper permissions to execute this procedure and have tested it by running the procedure directly in Query Analyzer and by calling it in Query Analyzer successfully.

However when I try to call this procedure from another programming envirnoment, once the xp_cmdshell process is called, the procedure locks up and blocks the rest of the process, including the other software programming environment. When I look at the error log, it indicates that correct command, as a matter of fact I have copied the log file command into Query Analyzer and ran the procedure successfully. So for some reason, the statement is not being committed or there is some kind of threading issue I do not know how to address.

If anyone out there has any suggestions or has a simular problem in the past and knows how to address it, it would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!

View 4 Replies View Related

Lock On Table While Inserting Data In Database

Jul 10, 2014

I have question on lock on table in SQL Server while inserting data using multiple processes at a single time into same table.Here are my questions on this,

1) Is it default behavior of SQL server to lock table while doing insert?
2) if yes to Q1, then how we can implicitly mention while inserting data.
3) If I have 4 tables and one table is having foreign keys from rest of the 3 tables, on this scenario do I need to use the table lock explicitly or without that I can insert records into those tables?

View 1 Replies View Related

Database Wars: Oracle Vs SQL Server Lock Escalation

Jul 20, 2005

I was at a conference and had it asserted to me by an Oracleafficiando that Oracle and DB2 handled low-level locks "better" thanSQL Server, and that this was likely the cause of SQL Server'srelatively slower and more deadlock-prone performance when running thesame application. (SQL does seem to perform more poorly for this app,a PeopleSoft customer service and billing app.)Is there any significant difference in lock escalation strategiesbetween major databases, and if so, what are the implications?Jeff Roughgarden, MSCD, MCDBA

View 1 Replies View Related

Recovery :: Dead Lock Will Cause Failure Of Database Differential Backup?

May 29, 2015

My Database has many Dead lock issues,Will this Dead locks  cause Differential database failure ?.

View 6 Replies View Related

ERROR: A Variable May Only Be Added Once To Either The Read Lock List Or The Write Lock List.

May 22, 2006

Hi,
I have set of 2 DTS packages, one of which calls the other by forming a command-line (dtexec) using a Execute Process task.

From the parent package-> Execute Process Task->
dtsexec /F etc... /<pkg variable> = "servername"

Each of the parent and the called package have a variable: "User::DWServerSQLInstance" which is mapped to the SQL server connection manager server name property using an expression. The outer package has the above variable and so does the inner called package (which gets assigned through the command line from the outerpackage call to inner)

I "sometimes" get the following error:

OnError,I4,TESTDOMAdministrator,ACDWAggregation,{A1F8E43F-15F1-4685-8C18-6866AB31E62B},{77B2F3C7-6756-46EB-8C01-D880598FB4B3},5/22/2006 5:10:28 PM,5/22/2006 5:10:28 PM,-1073659822,0x,The variable "User::DWServerSQLInstance" is already on the read list. A variable may only be added once to either the read lock list or the write lock list.

Help would be appreciated!

I have seen other posts on this but, not able to relate the solution to my scenario.

View 9 Replies View Related

A Variable May Only Be Added Once To Either The Read Lock List Or The Write Lock List

May 10, 2006

Hi All,



I have seen a few other people have this error.

Package works fine when run from BIDS, DTExec, dtexecui. When I schedule it, It get these random errors. (See below)

The main culprit is a variable called "RecordsetFileDIR" which is set using an expression. (@[User::_ROOT] + "RecordSets\")

A number of other variables use this as part of their expression and as they all fail, pretty much everything dies.

I have installed SP1 (Not Beta) on server. Package uses config files to set the value of _ROOT.



The error does not always seem to be with this particular variable though. Always a variable that uses an expression but errors are random. Also, It will run 3 out of 10 times without a problem. I am the only person on the server at the time.

Any ideas?



Cheers,

Crispin



Error log:

OnError,,,POSBasketImport,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1073659822,0x,The variable "User::RecordsetFileDIR" is already on the read list. A variable may only be added once to either the read lock list or the write lock list.

OnError,,,POSBasketImport,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1073639420,0x,The expression for variable "rsHeaderFile" failed evaluation. There was an error in the expression.

OnError,,,DF_Header_Header,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1071636247,0x,Accessing variable "User::rsHeaderFile" failed with error code 0xC00470EA.

OnError,,,Move All Data,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1071636247,0x,Accessing variable "User::rsHeaderFile" failed with error code 0xC00470EA.

OnError,,,Load Open Batches and Process Files,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1071636247,0x,Accessing variable "User::rsHeaderFile" failed with error code 0xC00470EA.

OnError,,,POSBasketImport,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1071636247,0x,Accessing variable "User::rsHeaderFile" failed with error code 0xC00470EA.

OnError,,,DF_Header_Header,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1071636390,0x,The file name is not properly specified. Supply the path and name to the raw file either directly in the FileName property or by specifying a variable in the FileNameVariable property.

OnError,,,Move All Data,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1071636390,0x,The file name is not properly specified. Supply the path and name to the raw file either directly in the FileName property or by specifying a variable in the FileNameVariable property.

OnError,,,Load Open Batches and Process Files,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1071636390,0x,The file name is not properly specified. Supply the path and name to the raw file either directly in the FileName property or by specifying a variable in the FileNameVariable property.

OnError,,,POSBasketImport,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1071636390,0x,The file name is not properly specified. Supply the path and name to the raw file either directly in the FileName property or by specifying a variable in the FileNameVariable property.

OnError,,,DF_Header_Header,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1073450901,0x,"component "rsHeader" (365)" failed validation and returned validation status "VS_ISBROKEN".

OnError,,,Move All Data,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1073450901,0x,"component "rsHeader" (365)" failed validation and returned validation status "VS_ISBROKEN".

OnError,,,Load Open Batches and Process Files,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1073450901,0x,"component "rsHeader" (365)" failed validation and returned validation status "VS_ISBROKEN".

OnError,,,POSBasketImport,,,10/05/2006 12:03:34,10/05/2006 12:03:34,-1073450901,0x,"component "rsHeader" (365)" failed validation and returned validation status "VS_ISBROKEN".

View 1 Replies View Related

Database Compatibility Level

Feb 20, 2001

Hi!
After upgrading SQL Server from 6.5 to 7.0 my production database compatibility level is "65".
I checked that by executing sp_dbcmptlevel <database_name>.
I can change it to "70" but my question is how it's going to affect the application and do I have to change it?

Thank you

Lena

View 2 Replies View Related

Database Level Security

Feb 7, 2008

Database level password security

View 2 Replies View Related

Database Level Change

Jul 20, 2005

I have many tables and in those i require to change some data. Sayfrom ARCA to ARCAEX. I am sure that the string is unique in the sensethere will be no ARCAABC. So what do i do change by not manuallyneeding to search in each table and the whole database and still canbe sure that the changes have taken place. Please helpRegards,Rajesh

View 2 Replies View Related

Enable The CLR At Database Level Only

Jul 26, 2007

Hi,

Is there a way to allow specific databases access to the CLR. Currently, my understanding is that when this setting is enabled, it applies to all databases within the instance.

Kind regards,

Jan.

View 1 Replies View Related

High Level &&amp; Detail Level Design Documents

Nov 19, 2007



Hi,
AM in need of SSRS 2005 design documents for a project purpose. Can somebody let me know where can i find these documents? Thanks in advance

View 1 Replies View Related

Question About Login At Database Level

Aug 27, 2007

Hi,i created at general database level a login 'Network service' (windows server 2003).At level of 'mydb' database, i created an user 'aspnet' and i associated it to the login 'Network service'. That user 'aspnet' receives the necessary schemas (db_read /db_write) rrquired by the application.Now, i removed the login 'Network Service' at general database level (not the user 'aspnet') but the application still runs properly.My question is: is it allowed to remove a defined login at general database level (in my case the login 'Network Service')?ThanksJean

View 5 Replies View Related

Connection Limit On Database Level

Nov 19, 2001

Can someone help me with the following problem:
I'm a SQL server DBA and we sell intern SQL-Server resources to the application teams based on needed storage and number of users.
I have several servers shared by different application teams.

Now I'm looking for a method to limit the number of users working together on a specified Database. Because when a project manager wants resources for 100 users I want to be sure that only 100 users can connect to that particular database at the same time.

I know I can limit the number of connections on server level but I need this on Db level too.

Can someone help me?

View 1 Replies View Related

Database Level Trigger Is Possible In SQL 2000?

Aug 3, 2006

Dear Freinds,

we are having an requirement to log the unauthorized backend update on database.Is there any other way ,apart from going and creating the triggers at each table to log the backend update.

Note :Is Database base level trigger is possible on SQL Server 2000?



Looking for your reply.

With Cheers :beer: ,
Sathesh.M

View 3 Replies View Related

Database Comatability Level After Replication Set Up

Jul 11, 2007

Hello



We moved SQL Server 2000 Databases to SQL Server 2005 Instance. If we change the Database compatibility level from 80 to 90, shall Replication will Fail? or any consequencies will arise? please advice. Thanks,

View 1 Replies View Related

Recovery :: Rollback At Database Level

Aug 20, 2015

Testing team is performing some activities on  MSSQL - 2008 R2 database ..and after completion of the test, again team wants to restore the  original database ( in the same state as before starting of the testing). Currently team is taking the back-up before starting testing and restoring the backup after the testing .. Since the database size is huge, this restoration is taking more time Is there any better way of taking the database to the previous state in lesser time.

View 3 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved