I have a database that had worked under msde 1.0 until reached the 2GB
of dimension and the dB was blocked. To make possible the work i had
deleted old data from some table. The database restart, but the
answers from server become very slow. So i decided to pass to Sql
Server 2000 without success. May i perform a check of this database?
if is a indexs problem there is a way to rebuild them?
Thanks in advance
Andy Wet
Hi
I want to convert the access2000 database to SQL server 2000.
I am able to convert the tables but unable to convert the query as view in SQL server 2000.
please quide how to convert the query as view in sql server 2000.
thanks
asm
Dear All...
I want my database file to be attached to remote server database when i published my site
Notes :
Remote Server Database:SqlServer2000
.net Version:1.1
hai,
I am working on ASP.NET 2003 with SQLServer2000. My application requires to be connected to the Database which is there in my Headoffice.
My SQLServerName is "MyDBServerTestDB"
Database Name is "WebTO", UserID="******" and Password="******"
My Remote Server IP Address is "192.168.1.2" and its Static IP is "58.93.61.235"
I have specified the Connection string for my Remote Server as
"Provider=SQLOLEDB.1;Server=58.93.61.235TestDB;UID=******;PWD=******;Database=WebTO"
(or)
"Provider=SQLOLEDB.1;Server=58.93.61.235TestDB,1433;UID=******;PWD=******;Database=WebTO" (1433 is the Port number of the Remote SQLServer)
but it is giving the error " SQL Server does not exist or access denied".
if i execute the same application at my Headoffice (Remote Server) by changing the Connection string as
"Provider=SQLOLEDB.1;Server=192.168.1.2TestDB;UID=******;PWD=******;Database=WebTO"
then, it is working fine.
Can anyone tell me where i went wrong or what i have to specify in my Connection string so that i can access my Remote Database Server.
Thanks in Advance,
Srinivas.
I was attempting to create a linked server from SQL-Server2000 to an Access97 mdb file using the following scripts
EXEC sp_addlinkedserver
@server='REMOTE_OFFICE',
@srvproduct='Jet 4.0',
@provider='Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0',
@datasrc='F:RealEstate_Office1.mdb'
and
EXEC sp_addlinkedsrvlogin
@rmtsrvname='REMOTE_OFFICE',
@useself='false',
@locallogin='sa',
@rmtuser='Admin',
@rmtpassword=NULL
And while querying the linked server from the query analyzer using the following select command
SELECT *
FROM REMOTE_OFFICE.RealEstate_Office1.dbo.E_GOV_RE_OK
I got the following error
Server: Msg 7312, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Invalid use of schema and/or catalog for OLE DB provider 'Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0'. A four-part name was supplied, but the provider does not expose the necessary interfaces to use a catalog and/or schema.
OLE DB error trace [Non-interface error].
could you explain why this happen
I have a database that's 2.5GB but only has about 17MB of actual data. I've setup a standby server that I load my dumps into. The load takes about 10 miuntes. The dump takes about a minute and a half (which also seems slow to me for that small amount of data). I don't expect that it should take that long to load 8800 pages into a database. The standby server is the same hardware as the production server (sinlge 500MHz Xeon, 2GB RAM, RAID 5). The server has only a single RAID 5 array to store all the OS, and all the SQL data however, I still don't thinkit should take thta long to load. Let me know what you think.
--Buddy
I have a access database, the data store in another server. This noon, one of our user is runing the access database too slow. Open the database and search the data, etc. It took a long time to come out, Any body has experience on it, why, we had etrust install on each user machine, is that cause this too slow? Thanks in advance.
View 1 Replies View Relateddear friends,
i have dropped many objects and recreated in a database.suddenly my database became very slow. so please any one of friends give solution.
HI Friends,
My database performing slow.
In which area i will take care.
Can u any body plz explaine me step by step plz
Thsx
siva
Meti BEST OF THE BEST
I have designed a 22 table database in sql server that is to act as a backup/alternate access to the data we have stored in an ADABAS database. I've also written a vb.net console program that will take data from ADABAS through a broker connection (one row at a time), checks the sql server database to see if that information is already stored, and then either performs an insert or an update.
I can write the rows from ADABAS to a text file (not using the broker), at the rate of about 1.3 million rows in 1.3 hours. Data can be imported (I'm not sure how this import is done, possibly via a CSV file. SELECTS/UPDATES are not done, just INSERTS) at about 1 million or so an hour. But when I do the update, receiving information via the broker from ADABAS to the VB program (with it's SELECT, then UPDATE/INSERT), I'm only doing about 20-25 thousand rows an hour.
I ran a trace using the SQL Server Analyzer on the database while running the update program, and then ran Profiler using the generated workload. It created a few indices, but I just restarted the update program (I'm still developing, so I delete all rows from all tables each time I rerun the update), but I haven't seen that it's really any faster.
I have a rather large set of data to transfer over, and this 20-25 thousand row time is not nearly fast enough.
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks,
We just installed SQL Server version 800.194 on a dual processorserver equipped with a gigabyte of RAM, running Windows 2000 Serveroperating system. We set up a few databases with (so far) very tinytables.When I am working locally (i.e. on the server itself) with QueryAnalyzer, even the simplest operation is incredibly slow. If I bringup Windows Task Manager looking at the Processes pane (Query Analyzershows up as "isqlw.exe"), and use "View/Select Columns..." to choose"I/O Writes" and "I/O Write Bytes", then I observe that doing aselect* on a table with a single row results in over 500 "I/O Writes"and 170,000 "I/O Write Bytes" of data written. It requires 15 secondsto return the single row of information.Even clicking on the Change Database Listbox results in hundreds ofwrite operations!However, when I am working remotely with Query Analyzer, the select*works perfectly normally. Neither "I/O Writes" nor "I/O Write Bytes"are recorded.I figure maybe there is some sort of security logging turned on thatrecords everything you do...Whatever is going on here, how do you turn it off?Tom
View 1 Replies View RelatedI just found out the response time of open a connection or execute a SQL command over VPN is very slow. It takes around 150ms for each round trip. If the same program run on LAN, it takes less than 1ms. I understand that VPN may have encryption and thus have a bit delay. However, if the delay happens whethever I make a SQL call, it will be unacceptable. Is there anything that I have missed out? If the delay occurs once only, it will be still great. (I think this is the point of connection pooling. Right?) However, it's really bad if the delay occurs each time I call SQL. Please help!
View 5 Replies View RelatedHas anyone else experienced this?
Database Restore takes much longer on Windows 2003 64-bit than on 32-bit...
Is this simply the Service Pack level or does it have to do with the 64-bit/32-bit issue?
We have a Development/QA/Production environment setup in this manner:
DEV - fast restores - (about 2 hours)
OS: Windows Server 2003 R2 Service Pack 2
DB: SQL 2000 Service Pack 4 (32-bit)
QA - slow restores - (about 10 hours)
OS: Windows Server 2003 x64 Service Pack 1
DB: SQL 2000 Service Pack 4 (32-bit)
Production - slow restores - (about 10 hours)OS: Windows Server 2003 x64 Service Pack 1
DB: SQL 2000 Service Pack 4 (32-bit)
Thank you for your time in advance!!!
Adminicrater
I have a portal site that has many iframes loading various pages. One of the iframes requires data from a database that has a slow connection and right now there is nothing we can do about the slow connection and is something we have to live with.
What seems to be happening though is that even though each page is loading seperatly in an iframe, when the page loads with the slow connection, it seems to hold up processing on the server for the other frames until the connection has been established with the server. It can be something like 10 seconds. I am guessing trying to establish the connection is holding up the worker process on IIS???
So I am trying to find a workaround bearing in mind there is nothing we can do about the slow connection for the time being? Does anyone have any suggestions? One I am thinking of is forcing this frame to load last so at least the other frames are not being held up. Another is maybe to use a seperate thread, but does anyone have any idea on this?
Thanks in advance
I'm querying a small SQL2005 database and finding that the query can sometimes complete in under a second and then 5 minutes later the same query can take 15 minutes to complete.
The query I'm running is very simple as follows:
select TOP 26 * from vSearchListOpportunityItem WHERE OpIt_OpportunityId=2495 ORDER BY Prod_Name, OpIt_OpportunityItemId
The view it is pulling data from only contains only 1890 lines, which in turn pulls data from 3 tables with 821, 2560, and 1957 lines of data. In other words it's small. I have noticed that if I try and open the smallest of these tables while on a 'go slow' period it also takes around 15 minutes to return the data.
The database was originally on SQL 2000. It is the only database on this powerful quad core server.
The SQL Server CPU usage never goes above 40%, and always has free memory.
No sign of locks.
I can't figure out why such a small database is going so slow with such a simple query. Any ideas?
I am developing a mobile 5.0 application. I use mobile Sql as the database in the pda.
In the program, i use dataset.xsd to create the table and tableAdapter, but the performance is very slow for just access the data from the database. It takes about 4200ms for just
this.userAdapter = new PDA_USERTableAdapter();
MBDB2DataSet.PDA_USERDataTable ut = userAdapter.GetUser();
the "new PDA_USERTableAdapter()" is very fast.But...
The userAdapter.GetUser() will only return about 20 rows, each rows only contains 5 field .But it cost 4200 ms for this line.
The sql statement in userAdapter.GetUser() is
SELECT User, PASSWORD, TYPE, USER_ID, Supervisor_ID
FROM PDA_USER
WHERE (TYPE = 5)
ORDER BY User
Please Help, Urgent!!!!!
p.s (The total rows in the PDA_USER table is only 30 rows)
Thank you very much
Hi i have a sql server instance on my system and it is linking into an oracle database on another server. When i run queries against this other server...it takes forever...
However, when i use access, and link the table and run the same query against the oracle database...it runs immediatly.
I am very confused as to why there would be such a performance difference and why sql server would run so slow.
I am wondering if it has something to do with the way i configured the linked server. there are several options that I didn't know what they meant.
collation compatible (not selected)
Data access (selected)
RPC (not selected)
RPC Out (not selected)
collation name
connection timeout
query timeout
I upgraded from 6.5 to 7.0 SP3. Now when I save (write) an invoice it takes about 10-12 seconds, at 6.5 it was 1-3 seconds. SQL Server and my Materials App are the only thing running on this box. This is the only area that has gotten slower everything else works great. I have 3 users saving invoices and about 15 people total using the system at one time. It's a compaq DL580 loaded with memory, database is 2,195MB in size. Same 6.5 client to access system as before. Should I rebuild/reindex the database? Is there something from the old 6.5 version I need to remove?? Thanks in advance!!!
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi guys,
I am asking this question on behalf of a friend. I have little knowledge of SQL 2005 but my friend is quite knowledgeable, although this is the first time he is dealing with large database for a client. So here's the story.
His client has a database containing 1.5 million books. Now he is setting up a website which will enable users to search books. Searching by ISBN is no problem as it only takes 1 seconds. The problem is, searching by Title takes more than 20seconds, which is unacceptable. My friend has only done smaller database and he just recently thought of implementing indexing and now looking for other ideas.
Each row contains book details such as Title, Author1, Author2, Author3, Publisher, Publication Date, ISBN, etc.
Can anyone who are more experienced in doing large database share with me some design ideas? His client is aiming for 8seconds or less.
Thanks in advance!
Hi,
My database was previously running on sql2000 with 2 gigs of RAM and 2 x 2.8ghz XEON processors, and was running pretty decently.
I've now upgraded to SQL2005, 8 gigs of RAM, and 1 Intel 5130 2ghz processor (supposed to be more CPU power than previously)
The problem is its now running very SLOW.
I have run a trace and I'm finding queries that used to take 50,000 reads are now taking 1.4 million reads (25x more) The system runs for a decent amount of time but then SLOWS down massively for awhile. I can't find any cause yet.
What could be causing this ? What steps can I take towards resolving this? I have ran Tara's isp_ALTER_INDEX to try and help, I'm not sure what else to do.
Any suggestions are GREATLY appreciated..
Thanks very much,
mike123
I've noticed that after the database have been idle for some time, it takes up to 10 seconds to get it started when something needs to access it. In the event viewer it says that the database <name> have been started.
Obviously, there is some idle timeout setting.
I saw an option in the database properties that is called "Auto Close" which is set to true. I assume this is what i'm looking for. Can someone confirm that? (it could take some time to test myself...)
But what i'm actually wondering is:
1. Is it possible to adjust how long it would wait before timing out?
2. What advantages does closing the database bring? Does it free up (a noticeable amount of) ressources? Or is it only that it's unlocking the files, so that it's possible to copy the database source files?
Hi all,
This managed application was written to run on a Symbol 3090 Win CE 5.0 scanning device. We are using the symbol provided classes to access the scanning interface, and SQL Compact database on the device to collect the scanned data, and then using merge replication to synchronize scanned data when the device is docked. The problem we have experienced seems to be releated to the performance when inserting and updating records in the database.
We have tested some randomly generated 1000 records and inserting/updatating into a database. At first the time to commit a record increases when the database is flushing into the memory (The flush interval in the connection string property is 10 seconds by default). and then as the database size grows increasing the time to commit every single record which is causing the application to perform slowly as they scan items into the database. However, the device program memory remains consistant as they are scan items. From our tests, I found the time to execute either a update/insert command on 2MB sqlMobile database (upto 10000 records, depending on the size of the columns) is taking nearly 2 to 2 and half seconds to complete. Below is the only code I am executing,
If Not sqlObj.UpdateItem(1061022, itemNo, 1) Then
sqlObj.InsertResultSet(1061022, itemNo, itemObj.Style, itemObj.Color, itemObj.Size, itemObj.Description, 0, 1)
End If
For the notes, I am using prepared updated command and resultset.insert methods to perform update and insert commands into the database.
Any help on this issue is highly appreciated.
Thanks
Ravi.
When I try to install MS SQl server2000 on windows XP machine,it says the server component is not supported by OS.What should I do to get it run on my machine?
View 3 Replies View RelatedHi,
I'm Arash Baseri a Sql Server2000 developer and mail you from Dubai (U.A.E). I have a problem in Sql Server locking table. My problem is not reasonable so the more I researched the more I understand it is not my problem .it is a bug in Sql Server2000.
Now I explain the situation:
I have two tables (Table A and Table B).Table A has a clustered index on col1 and col2, Table B has a clustered index on col1 and col2. I join these tables and update col3 in table A, like this
begin tran
insert [Table A]
select * from Arshiv_Master where Col1 between 26001 AND 26001
Update AI31 set Col3=Case
when 1=1 then 1
Else 0 End
From [Table A]AI5, [Table B]AI31
where AI5.Col1=AI31.Col1 And AI31.Col1 Between 26001 And 26001
/* intentionally I didn't rollback or commit transaction to hold locks on table*/
In another connection I execute this query and I face "Lock request timeout period exceeded" error message.
set lock_timeout 1
set transaction isolation level read uncommitted
Update AI31 set Col3=Case
when 1=1 then 0
Else 0 End
From [Table A] AI5, [Table B] AI31 where AI5.Col1=AI31.Col1 and AI31.Col1 between 45018 And 60000
Now the most interesting part is here .when I use a smaller data range for Col1 no error message is shown. A query like this
set lock_timeout 1
set transaction isolation level read uncommitted
Update AI31 set Col3=Case
when 1=1 then 0
Else 0 End
From [Table A] AI5, [Table B] AI31 where AI5.Col1=AI31.Col1 and AI31.Col1 between 45018 And 50000
As you see the difference between the last two queries is on WHERE clause especially on data rages of Col1.
As you know Sql Server 2000 has row level lock and when I acquire a lock on a record the other records are free. So what's wrong with Sql Server that assumes the others records are locked. I tested this situation in Sql Server 2005 and this problem was not seen so I think it's a bug in Sql Server 2000.Who can help me about this problem?
Hi,
I'm Arash Baseri a Sql Server2000 developer and mail you from Dubai (U.A.E). I have a problem in Sql Server locking table. My problem is not reasonable so the more I researched the more I understand it is not my problem .it is a bug in Sql Server2000.
Now I explain the situation:
I have two tables (Table A and Table B).Table A has a clustered index on col1 and col2, Table B has a clustered index on col1 and col2. I join these tables and update col3 in table A, like this
begin tran
insert [Table A]
select * from Arshiv_Master where Col1 between 26001 AND 26001
Update AI31 set Col3=Case
when 1=1 then 1
Else 0 End
From [Table A]AI5, [Table B]AI31
where AI5.Col1=AI31.Col1 And AI31.Col1 Between 26001 And 26001
/* intentionally I didn't rollback or commit transaction to hold locks on table*/
In another connection I execute this query and I face "Lock request timeout period exceeded" error message.
set lock_timeout 1
set transaction isolation level read uncommitted
Update AI31 set Col3=Case
when 1=1 then 0
Else 0 End
From [Table A] AI5, [Table B] AI31 where AI5.Col1=AI31.Col1 and AI31.Col1 between 45018 And 60000
Now the most interesting part is here .when I use a smaller data range for Col1 no error message is shown. A query like this
set lock_timeout 1
set transaction isolation level read uncommitted
Update AI31 set Col3=Case
when 1=1 then 0
Else 0 End
From [Table A] AI5, [Table B] AI31 where AI5.Col1=AI31.Col1 and AI31.Col1 between 45018 And 50000
As you see the difference between the last two queries is on WHERE clause especially on data rages of Col1.
As you know Sql Server 2000 has row level lock and when I acquire a lock on a record the other records are free. So what's wrong with Sql Server that assumes the others records are locked. I tested this situation in Sql Server 2005 and this problem was not seen so I think it's a bug in Sql Server 2000.Who can help me about this problem?
Hello All,
I’m looking for a solution to timeouts that occur when I’m executing a stored procedure from my web application. Most of the SPs will run from 3 to 15 minutes, and, unfortunately, modifying/optimizing them isn’t an option at the moment. I tried setting the CommandTimeout to 0 with no luck. Unless, I didn’t use it properly. Here’s my code: 1
2 try
3 {
4 string dbConn = ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["ConStringNTMTLDEV"].ToString();
5 OleDbConnection connection = new OleDbConnection(dbConn);
6
7 lbl_SearchResult.Text = dbConn;
8
9 //OleDbDataAdapter adapter = new OleDbDataAdapter();
10 OleDbCommand cmd = new OleDbCommand("SP_CallHistoryLookUp", connection);
11 cmd.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure;
12
13 cmd.Parameters.Add(new OleDbParameter("@phoneNumber", "1234567890"));
14 cmd.Parameters.Add(new OleDbParameter("@email", "123@123.com"));
15 cmd.Parameters.Add(new OleDbParameter("@WebUser", "123"));
16 connection.Open();
17 cmd.CommandTimeout = 0;
18 cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
19 cmd.Dispose();
20 connection.Close();
21 }catch(OleDbException ex)
22 {
23 lbl_SearchResult.Text += "<br/> Something went wrong </br>";
24 lbl_SearchResult.Text += ex.Message.ToString();
25 }
26
27
28
Is it possible to launch a stored procedure and close the connection without waiting for a result?Would the stored procedure still run on the SQL server? I’m using MSSQL 7. Would you have any examples that would solve this problem? Thank you for your help.
R.
HI,
I have a application which has Access as Front end and SQLServer as BackEnd.
I have a table which has student details.
Table Fields are:
Record#,FirstName,LastName,MiddleName,Address,City ,State,Pin,.....
The table has about 1200 records.
Every Thing works fine but in the front end when i try to do a search by
FirstName it is VERY SLOW.But it is okey if i search by the Record#.
I need to search by lastname or Firstname and speed up the process.
Any Help will be appreciated,
Thanks,
Rang.
What are the experiences of those who have upgraded to
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhat are the experiences of those who have upgraded to SQL Server 2000?
I am writing a paper for my company and wish to list features of SQL Server 2000 from a user/developer/business aspect. We are on
SQL Server 6.5 and I need to highlight the advantages and disadvatages of upgrading.
Thanks
Jeff
Hi everybody,
I configured Logshipping in sql server 2000(Enterprise edition).in destination server copy and restore is failing(but there is no error).Out ofsync threshold value is set 27 minutes, after 27 minutes i found the error message in sql server error logs "The log shipping destination HARSHA.Northwind1 is out of sync by 27 minutes..
Any body help me
Hi gang,
Just trying to get some information on what is required to migrate from Access 2000 to SQL Server?? Is it pretty difficult to do? Are there any changes to the data or structure that is needed? Is SQL Server more secure? What about MSDE instead of SQL?? I'm just needing some tips and info on what to expect and all as I think we are going there kinda soon. I can do many things in Access but not sure how to go about them in SQL Server? Can you also do reports from there as well?
Inquiring mind wants to know
have a nice one,
Bud
There is a Server with 4G Memory. I installed a SQL Server 2000 standardversion on it.I heard that SQLServer2000 could use only up to 2GB memory. Is it true?How can I use those 4GB memory? I can not upgrade to SQL Server 2005 orother version because i don't want to take this risk.Thank you very much.
View 8 Replies View RelatedHi, Is it possible to use ssis for the etl processes and still have an existing 2000 db? For e.g. CanI create a ssis pkg and use the xml task to download data to a 2000 db.
View 4 Replies View Related