I am trying to access a single variable in a script and a deadlock error continues to come up. I have a single string variable that is added to the readwritevariables collection in the editor. I am trying to execute the following code:
Dim variables As Variables
Try
Dts.VariableDispenser.LockForWrite("Test")
Dts.VariableDispenser.GetVariables(variables)
Catch ex As Exception
Throw ex
Finally
variables.Unlock()
End Try
I have installed Service Pack2 and this error continues. I know it has been posted on before and I appreciate any help.
I have a problem to read varibale inside script. the error discription is following-
Error: A deadlock was detected while trying to lock variables "User::FilePath" for read/write access. A lock cannot be acquired after 16 attempts. The locks timed out.
this is my code. i my code i am using two variables, but i can access only one . i have to retrive file directory and file path is generated by other system.
I am not able to access SSIS variables which are defined at Data Flow Task in a custom component. This custom component is developed by me in C#. How can i access these variables?
Please let me know if theres a way to access SSIS variables.
...I guess that simply means that I can't access a package's variables within a custom log provider? Can anyone comment/confirm? Any other options/routes to achieving the same..?
Is there a way to send out an email woth deadlock information (victim query, winner query, process id's and resources on which the deadlock occurred) as soon as a deadlock occurs in a database or at instance level?I currently has trace flag 1222 turned on. And also created an alert that send me an email whenever a deadlock occurs. but it just says that a deadlock occurred and I log into sql server error log and review the information.
I am not comfortable with DTS 2000 but I need to execute a encapsulated DTS 2000 package from a SSIS package. The real problem is when I need to pass SSIS variables to DTS 2000 package. The DTS 2000 package have 3 global variables that I can identify on " Execute DTS 2000 Package Task Editor - Inner Variables ". I believe the SSIS variables must be mapped on " Execute DTS 2000 Package Task Editor - OuterVariables ". How can I associate the SSIS variables(OuterVariables ) to "Inner Variables"? How can I do it? Much Thanks.
In a high traffic environment, deadlocks eventually occur as number of data processes increase. How can deadlocks be avoided, minimized and resolved. Please kindly provide scenario examples and samples of T-SQL code. Thanks much.
Iam trying to bcp a table(residing on my prod server to my local machine from command prompt) .Actually the table iam trying to bcp has heavy updates and selects, from users (70 users). The users complain that system becomes slow.Is it got anything to do with my trying to bcp the mentioned table(table has 170,000 records).Also whenever i try to bcp this table, only after being chosen as the deadlock victim by Sql server,for 3 or 4 times that iam able to bcp the table.
Any help regarding this will be very much appreciated TIA kinnu
I am unable to control the granularity of locks in our queries. We are running queries through MTS and are getting deadlocks.
The batch includes two inserts and one select query - all are hitting on only one table. This table has a unique clustered and a unique nonclustered index as well as a primary key.
Within the batch, I have given a table hint to set transaction isolation level to READCOMMITTED, ROWLOCK for the insert statements, like this
INSERT INTO ib_price with (READCOMMITTED,ROWLOCK)........
and the same for the Select statement.
SELECT retail_price, price_status_id FROM ib_price with (READCOMMITTED,ROWLOCK)
When I run sp_lock on the spid, I get output indicating that SS7 is placing a IX lock on the table. I'm pretty sure this is a big contributor to the deadlock.
I get the deadlock when I try to run more than one client with similar insert parameters.
How can I control the granularity to just rowlocks?
I am getting deadlock running a stored procedure from two machines. Looking at the error log (generated using trace flag 1204 and 3605), it seems the deadlock is on a key. But what I fail to understand is how come sql server granted exclusive lock on the key to both connections. The grant list shows that lock with Mode X is granted to both connection.
Can anyone help me resolve deadlock with following text
Parallel Query worker thread Involved in deadlock.
I am particularly interested in resolving details of above mentioned line,as I started getting dead lock more frequently now and when I look into query involved blocking and victim I see nothing that can cause deadlock they are update insert and select statement which were fine for long and all of sudden started giving problem.
Thanks in advance, for any knowledge share my mail id scraval@hotmail.com
Hi, When many users run some stored procedures I 've got some deadlocks. How to avoid that? We run large stored procedures code which are using sometime the same table. What is the best way for using the transaction isolation level, fillfactor indexes, procedure cache configuration ...etc to avoid that.
In addition, I am using MTS and sometimes the Tempdb is also locked, is it a Microsoft bug (again) ?
We had a dead lock every night 9:00pm. I found out Server/Current Activity --Object Locks : The error log showing error 17824, severity:10, state 0 DNCC TRACEON 208, SPID 28 DBCCTRACEOFF 208, SPID 28 In current activity --object locks and reapetedly showing "tempdb.dbo.sysobjects/sysindexes/syscolumns" 28:sa.master.dbo /INSERT /SQL_servername (MS SQLEW)
Sorry for bombading the forum with all these questions, but i am relatively new to sql 2000.
I am getting dead lock on the following procedure.
important background information 1. this is a multi user web-based call centre application 2. this procedure loads up a new contact based on priority
I see no reason how a dead lock could occur. does any one have any idea. could it be something else that is locking up resource used by this procedure?
CREATE PROCEDURE topcat.getNewContactInfo ( @contact_id int ) AS BEGIN begin transaction
declare @id int
set @id = (SELECT TOP 1 _id FROM class_contact WHERE (status IS NULL OR status='New Contact' OR status = 'No Connect' OR status='callback') AND (checked_in IS NULL OR checked_in <> 1) AND (callback_date >= (getdate() + 1) OR callback_date IS NULL ) ORDER BY priority DESC)
UPDATE class_contact SET checked_in = 1 WHERE _id = @id SELECT TOP 1 * FROM class_contact WHERE _id = @id
commit END GO
wat i dont' get is that, this procedure only has one update statement, this is the only statement that could possibly hold a lock on another resource (i think) , i can't see how a dead lock can happen in this case since this procedure doesn't hold up 2 resources at a time.
Using SQL Server 2000 SP3a, I run the following in 2 query analizerwindows on the Northwind database, the second one always gets thedeadlock Msg 1205:Window 1:declare @cnt intselect @cnt = 5while @cnt > 0beginbegin transactionselect * from orders (updlock) where employeeid = 1update orders set employeeid = 1 where employeeid = 1waitfor delay '00:00:03'commitselect @cnt = @cnt -1endWindow 2:declare @cnt intselect @cnt = 5while @cnt > 0beginbegin transactionselect * from orders (updlock) where employeeid = 1 and customerid ='ERNSH'waitfor delay '00:00:02'commitselect @cnt = @cnt -1endThe query in the first window gets 123 rows and places update locks onthem, then updates them and commits. The query in the second windowgets a subset (about 5) of the results that window 1 gets also tryingto place update locks on the same rows. Shouldn't the query in window 2just wait for the transaction in window 1 to finish? why would itdeadlock?you can also get rid of the delay in the second window and it willdeadlock faster.thanks in advance.Eugene
Hi.create table joe(c1 integer not null, c2 integer not null)Two sessions:Session 1:BEGIN TRANinsert into joe (c1,c2) values (1,2)Session 2:BEGIN TRANinsert into joe (c1,c2) values (3,4)Session 1:select * from joeSession 2:select * from joeOne of the sessions gets a deadlock victim message.thanks,Joe
I have a table that every 30 minutes needs to be repopulated fromanother table that is recreated from scratch just before.What I did was this:CREATE PROCEDURE BatchUpdProducts ASbegin transactiondelete productsinsert into productsselect * from productsTempcommit transactionGOThis takes about 30 seconds to run. I tried it doing it with a cursor,row by row, but it took like 30 minutes to run instead. The problemis with the fast approach is, once in a while I get a deadlock errorin different areas trying to access the products table. Using SQLServer 2000 by the way.Any ideas?
Here is the exception I am getting, any idea why this might be happening:
Exception: ThisMethod is done: let this go: Exception: Transaction (Process ID 74) was deadlocked on lock | communication buffer resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction. Stack Trace: at
Hi, I need to trace deadlock, one of article was mentioning “QL Server Profiler's Create Trace Wizard to run the "Identify The Cause of a Deadlock" for SQL Server 7.0, is there any way I can do this in Sql Server 2000?
Hi Guys. I just want to ask some insights on SQL Server Deadlock and what is the best way to handle deadlock in asp.net? Or something like a Try... Catch.. statement to handle the error? Please advice. Thanks in advance.
I have set up an alert to detect when Page Deadlocks rise above 0. Overnight I have DTS packages populating SQL Server and various other jobs (Cognos Cube Builds etc.). My alert detected a Deadlock during the night but all of my processes completed fine. My problem/misunderstanding is that my alert is still popping up every 5 mins saying there is a Deadlock yet there is nothing running or no-one accessing SQL server and I cannot see any trace of the Deadlock in the Current Activity. Is this normal or is it a bug?
Hi, Can I use the Create Trace Wizard to trace the cause for a deadlock....I have created a new Trace , so in the couse of today if I encounter a deadlock will I know....how is this indicated....Please do let me know as I am using this for the first time.....
I have (amongst many) an overnight SQL stored procedure that occasionally takes over an hour to run compared to its usual 2 minutes. It does the same each night, as does everything around it. (N.B. The job truncates and reinserts data into a table.)
I'm just wondering if a user request during the day that reads the table perhaps leave the PID open and thus a lock open with it. Then, perhaps my SQL job comes along and waits for the lock to release before it performs the truncate.
Couple of questions: 1. Could this happen? 2. If so, is there a log anywhere to suggest that a deadlock situation arose and PID x was the loser?
