In 7.0, an application development change has been made to defer name checking in
stored procedures until exection time. This allows a clean store of the proc in the system catalog
regardless of objects existing or not. At execution time, the proc is compiled, and object resolution is
done. Problem - the procedure fails if object names, column names, etc are wrong or don't exist.
So, during nightly cycle's the procedures bomb out.
Is there anyway to disable this 'deferred name resolution', or am I at the mercy of the developers?
Can I make the resolution immediate?
Is there any way to defer constriants in sql server 2005? I have found some sites that say use the keyword deferred but that always give me an "Incorrect syntax near 'deferred' "error.
I am trying to use the export wizard to export to a MS Access file, using the provide source query option. I get the error below when pasting the query in. The query does run successfully in SSMS, it is a long running query. About 8 minutes to complete.
TITLE: SQL Server Import and Export Wizard ------------------------------ The statement could not be parsed. ------------------------------ ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Deferred prepare could not be completed. Query timeout expired (Microsoft SQL Native Client)
I have 2 SQL servers. And in the first one I have added the second SQL as a Link Server. When I run an SQL statement on the linked server I get the following message. Server: Msg 7202, Level 11, State 1, Line 1Could not find server 'PROD' in sysservers. Execute sp_addlinkedserver to add the server to sysservers.[OLE/DB provider returned message: Deferred prepare could not be completed.] The SQL statement that I am runnins is Select * from openquery(PROD,'Select * from PROD.GMS.dbo.qryDispCL') But when I run only the SQL statement "Select * from PROD.GMS.dbo.qryDispCL" it works perfect. But I need to have the first statement running. Please help. Your valuable feedback is greatly appriciated.
1) "Deferred compile" recompile event occurs because of deferred name resolution. In other words, an object referred to in the statement does not exist at compile time. Later, when the object does exist, it requires a recompile of the statement so that it can create an optimal execution plan. One example of when a deferred compile will occur is if a temporary table is used in a batch and does not exist when the first statements in the batch are compiled.
Hello, I am trying to use the Import export wizard to created a package, using the provide source query option. If i just copy the query from a text file and try to paste , sql only accepts it partially. so i saved it as a sql file and then opened it in the window. However, when i click on 'next' or 'parse' , i get the below error.
TITLE: SQL Server Import and Export Wizard
------------------------------ The statement could not be parsed.
------------------------------ ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Deferred prepare could not be completed. Query timeout expired (Microsoft SQL Native Client)
The query is pretty big, but it executes successfully in the Management Studion Query Explorer window. I had no problem creating a package using DTS with the same query in Sql 2000. I also tried to migrate the package already existing in Sql 2000, but even though i can migrate it successfully , the package does not execute in Sql 2005. Also i tried other queries which are as big as this one, again the query source window during import/export does not seem to accept large queries??? I depend heavily on large queries for my packages, which i run daily. I have not had any issues with this is sql 2000. Can someone help me with this???
I am running the following query trying to return server properties across a linked server. I want to store the results in a table on the server where I an running the query.
DECLARE @BuildClrVersionx nvarchar(128)
SET @BuildClrVersionx =
(SELECT *
FROM OPENQUERY(LKMSSQLXYZ01, 'CONVERT(nvarchar(128),SERVERPROPERTY("BuildClrVersion")'))
I am getting the following errors:
OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "LKMSSQLADM01" returned message "Deferred prepare could not be completed.".
Msg 8180, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Statement(s) could not be prepared.
Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Line 1
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'CONVERT'.
If you have any ideas how I can run this query across a linked server I would appreciate it.
I have located a bug in the functions cdc.fn_cdc_get_net_changes_<capture_instance> generated when you enable cdc on a table. This bug can be triggered if 2 rows are created in the _CT table having the same values for the __$start_lsn, __$seqval and the table's key column(s). From research on the internet I have found such rows can be created by a "deferred update": a single update statement in which a column that is part of a unique constraint is updated.
In order to report the bug with Microsoft I need to create a complete series of steps-to-reproduce. But even though the situation happens several times a day in our production environment, I have not yet been able to reproduce it in my test environment.I need a single update statement (plus maybe some steps in advance) that make that the log reader inserts 2 rows into the _CT table, one with __$operation = 1 (delete) and another with __$operation = 2 (insert) as opposed to the single row with __$operation = 4 that it inserts for a normal update. Below is the script I have so far to create a fresh database, enable cdc, create a test table, insert some data and update this data.
I would have liked the last update statement to be handled as a "deferred update". However in all of my tests the log reader just simply inserts a single row into the cdc.dbo_NETTEST_CT table.how to reproduce the situation where I get the 2 rows with __$operation 1 and 2 from a single update statement instead of the single row with __$operation = 4.
Friends I have one SQL server2000 which have Mixed Mode authentication.It is working fine in PC which server instance is situating.But I have another PC which having connectvity tools of SQL Server.When I am trying to access SQL Server from the second PC through SQL authentication access getting denied.In the same time if I am accessing any of first PC's Folder using it's administrator password.Then if try with SQL authentication I am able to connect with SQL Server in the First PC from second PC .Please note SQL server instance is not in windows authentication mode .What may be the problem.Please suggest me a resolution
I am trying to add data to 2 columns CaseResolvDatetime and CaseResolvGroupName based on the criteria: 1. for a CallID, the last datetime where Resolution='Resolved' 2. where there is no 'Resolved', the 2nd last datetime & groupname for a particular CallID
INSERT @table(CallID, ResolvDatetime, GroupName, Resolution, CaseResolvDatetime, CaseResolvGroupName) SELECT '00458176','08/1/2005 1:41:54 PM','Field Sup CoOrd','Resolved',Null,Null UNION ALL SELECT '00458176','08/9/2005 3:35:24 PM','Service Desk','Reassigned',Null,Null UNION ALL SELECT '00458176','08/12/2005 9:54:37 AM','BSSAppSvcs-Club','Reassigned',Null,Null UNION ALL SELECT '00458176','08/16/2005 10:32:40 AM','CDR SysOps','Reassigned',Null,Null UNION ALL SELECT '00458176','08/24/2005 11:18:30 AM','CDR Server','Reassigned',Null,Null UNION ALL SELECT '00458176','08/24/2005 2:13:15 PM','Field Sup CoOrd','Reassigned',Null,Null UNION ALL SELECT '00458176','08/24/2005 4:01:24 PM','CDR Server','Resolved',Null,Null UNION ALL SELECT '00458176','08/25/2005 4:29:44 PM','Field Sup CoOrd','Reassigned',Null,Null UNION ALL SELECT '00458176','08/26/2005 2:59:19 PM','Service Desk','Reassigned',Null,Null UNION ALL SELECT '00458176','09/9/2005 10:42:44 AM','Field Sup - Vic','Completed',Null,Null UNION ALL SELECT '00461166','09/7/2005 9:49:02 AM','BSSAppSvcs-Apps','Resolved',Null,Null UNION ALL SELECT '00461166','09/7/2005 10:26:42 AM','Service Desk','Completed',Null,Null UNION ALL SELECT '00461166','09/9/2005 10:19:13 AM','BSSAppSvcs-Apps','Reassigned',Null,Null UNION ALL SELECT '00461166','09/15/2005 1:15:00 PM','Service Desk','Reassigned',Null,Null UNION ALL SELECT '00461166','09/15/2005 1:15:11 PM','Service Desk','Resolved',Null,Null UNION ALL SELECT '00456633','08/08/2005 1:18:32 PM','BSSAppSvcs-Club','Completed',Null,Null UNION ALL SELECT '00456633','08/26/2005 2:02:07 PM','Service Desk','Completed',Null,Null UNION ALL SELECT '00456633','08/26/2005 3:31:36 PM','Service Desk','Completed',Null,Null
SELECT CallID, ResolvDatetime, GroupName, Resolution, CaseResolvDatetime, CaseResolvGroupName FROM @table
UPDATE @table
SET CaseResolvDatetime = CASE WHEN Resolution = 'Completed' AND CallId = (select CallId from @table where GroupName like 'Ser%' AND Resolution = 'Completed') then ResolvDatetime ELSE NULL END
SELECT CallID, ResolvDatetime, GroupName, Resolution, CaseResolvDatetime, CaseResolvGroupName FROM @table -------------------------------------------------
At the moment I get the error:
Server: Msg 512, Level 16, State 1, Line 25 Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression. The statement has been terminated.
Yet when I change the line:
"where GroupName like 'Ser%'" to "where GroupName like 'CDR%'" ... I get no error.
I am merging two databases and created two different schemas to contain the objects in the new DB. I would like the objects in both schemas to be visible to one user but I can't figure out how to make this happen. I thought I could just set the Owner of the schemas to the same User but that didn't work. At the moment, the User default schema is set to dbo. I would like the default to be both schemas but this isn't an option.
Is there any way to have multiple schema objects visible to a single user? Thanks!
I'm running into problems with my replication where I get the following error: Violation of PRIMARY KEY constraint
I know what the error means, and I know what is causing it. In my case, a property is being added to an inventory item independently at the publisher and subscriber end. Each available property has a particular ID, each inventory item has its own unique ID, and of course the properties per inventory item are stored in a linking table. I am using UUIDs for the inventory items, to avoid collisions in that aspect, but the list of properties is fixed (currently only 15 - 20 available properties), so it doesn't make sense to me to have managed ranges, UUIDs, or other such things for the properties. Of course, I could apply a "source ID" to each added property to avoid these collisions, but I'd prefer not having to redesign the database, not to mention deal with the extraneous copies of properties.
My preference would be to simply have the server delete the copy on the server and take the subscriber row. I would have thought that using the "subscriber always wins" conflict resolver would have this effect, but it doesn't work for me. Is there a straightforward way of dealing with this problem? Am I missing something obvious? I've looked into a custom conflict resolver, but that seems like overkill for what must be a fairly common scenario.
For the record, the publisher in my case is SQL Server 2005, and the subscribers are SQL Server Mobile clients.
I am using Allwayson to replicate a FCI to a remote site. (windows 2012R2) Although all is implemented, iam getting a strange error with the listener resources after ive made a failover test.
It keeps saying "Name resolution not yet available"from my understanding this is trying to update an entry that doesn't exist (since the user has permissions to do it).
Is there any way to set up name resolution for DTC when there are two servers with the same name? I have three servers - two production systems named "SQL" and an archive system "DMART". I want to run DTC procedures to archive data from both SQL's to the DMART. Is there any way to set up the DMART so it can properly resolve the names from each of the SQL's? They are on separate networks, but unfortunately have the same NetBIOS name.
I'm just wondering what is the resolution or execution order for a query like this (simplified version):
CREATE VIEW ClosedSales AS SELECT * from NatSales where CurrentFlag = 1 and ValidTo <> '9999-99-99' Select * from ClosedSales where CustomerId = 10
The thing I want to know is:
- If first the complete dataset from the view is calculated and the the CustomerId=10 filter is applied - Or the CustomerId=10 condition is added to the where clause in the view definition
My real case is much more complex but that is an interesting point in my performance analysis.
DropDB.sql IF EXISTS (SELECT name FROM sys.databases WHERE name = N'Caching') DROP DATABASE [Caching]
I have gotten some great answers. Now I like to ask a deeper question. This command was created for SQL Server Express, for an internal software package at my company, by an outside vendor. However, sometimes this command doesn't work 100% on all user computers. So I have two questions. 1. Is there any way to either enhance the command, or the database command, to provide error diagnostics, to find out the issue for an individual user computer, why it doesn't always work? 2. Can anyone think of any scenarios that would prevent this from working? The key element here is that this caching database is supposed to allow individuals to use a particular piece of software, when they aren't connected to the network at work. But it doesn't always work on each computer - 100% of the time - even when the computer has SQL Server Express installed, and is running Windows XP. Randy
I have a couple of tables set up with column level tracking and using the "Subscriber Always Wins" conflict resolver.
I am still trying to work out why there is a conflict as the only updates to these rows happen at the subscriber.
What I am finding is that a conflict occurs and there appears to be a delay between the conflict being recognised and then resolved.
The reason I know there is a delay is because this is playing havoc with a data extract that relies on the updates from the subscriber.
For instance, I have a job on which the status is changed. That status change triggers an extract via BizTalk to another system. BizTalk, via an SQL adapter extracts the data from the server and I find that some of it is missing in the extract.
I go and look into the database at the raw data and find that the data is in fact there.
I have certain triggers running which set up export flags in the database to say this data should be exported. This works perfectly when there are no conflicts.
In each case where data has not been extracted, a conflict occurs.
Is there any way to guarantee that the conflict will be resolved at the same time as the synchronisation is complete - i.e. within the same transaction?
I thought replication was supposed to be a single transaction - you get it all or you get nothing.
I'm interested to hear from anyone who has experienced this behaviour.
I am doing a work were i have to syncronize data between a Publiser (PC, SQL SERVER 2005), and a subscriber (Pocket PC, SQL CE MOBILE). I studied lots of articles and i managed to put the syncronization to work, the problem is in conflict resolution!
The subscriber can´t insert or delet, only update!!
For exmple: I have a table that contais the quantity of a product X, for example 100 units, this goes to Pocket, but later arrive move 100 units that are increased in the PC, so we get 200 in the PC, (but 100 in Pocket), no problem if i syncronize now (Pocket will have 200 too), but if remove in Pocket for example 50 units, i've changed the same column in both Publisher and Subscriber database, if i syncronize now, i'll have a conflict, the final result should be 150 of product X in both databases (100 + 100 - 50), but the Publisher wins the conflict and the final result is 200!
I never worked with stored procedures and in microsoft theres and article called How to: Implement a Stored Procedure-Based Custom Conflict Resolver for a Merge Article (Replication Transact-SQL Programming), but they dont explain it very well and i dont know how to do my own stored procedure and implement it to the merge article.
in my own stored procedure i'll have to do some calculations to get the result i want, maybe using some table for the additions and subtractions. (Does the com based Addition resolver do this for me???)
Maybe you have experienced some problem like this, and could help me!
How should i do the stored procedure?
Oh, i tried to use de addiction resolver and the average resolver of com based but nothing happed, dont know why, i read some stuff and i think the addition could solve my problem, but it doesn´t work, i read above what you said and installed service pack 1 for sql 2005, but i instaled and nothing happened! When i change to the resolver that the subscriver wins, it works, why addition dont work?
I created a report in SSRS which incorporates an image.And I have written a code using C# to export the report to PDF. While I am exporting this report to PDF from the SSRS, the resolution of the image got decreased.
Can anyone give me a solution to configure the resolution of the image in the PDF.
An outside vendor created this command and SQL files for internal software, using SQL Server Express, which is installed on every user machine
osql -S (local)SQLEXPRESS -E -i DropDB.sql The SQL file has this: IF EXISTS (SELECT name FROM sys.databases WHERE name = N'Caching') DROP DATABASE [Caching]
This command was created for SQL Server Express, for an internal software package at my company, by an outside vendor. However, sometimes this command doesn't work 100% on all user computers. So I have two questions. 1. Is there any way to either enhance the command, or the database command, to provide error diagnostics, to find out the issue for an individual user computer, why it doesn't always work? 2. Can anyone think of any scenarios that would prevent this from working? The key element here is that this caching database is supposed to allow individuals to use a particular piece of software, when they aren't connected to the network at work. But it doesn't always work on each computer - 100% of the time - even when the computer has SQL Server Express installed, and is running Windows XP. Randy
I'm having some problems getting Interactive Conflict Resolution working under SQL Server 2000 SP4. I have set "Allow Subscribers to resolve conflicts interactively" under the Resolver tab for the article in the publication. I have set "Enable synchronization using Windows Synchronization Manager" and "Resolve conflicts interactively" under the Synchronization tab for the subscription. I have set "Resolve conflicts interactively" under the Other tab for the subscription properties in the Windows Synchronization Manager. However, when I generate conflicting data in the publishing and subscribed DBs and synchronize using the manager, the resolution is automatic and a warning pops up informing me that "conflicts occurred while syncronizing the data and were resolved according to defined rules." Am I missing anything here?
i created a query and when i run it like this i get data but when i add a value in the 2ed case for '2%' i get error. Select a.email, case when a.reportnumber like '1%' then (select b.Reportnumber from ijasSummaryNo b where a.Reportnumber = b.Reportnumber) end as Reportnumber, case when a.Reportnumber like '1%' then (select b.stonebreakdown from ijasSummaryNo b where a.Reportnumber = b.Reportnumber) end as Measurement, case when a.Reportnumber like '1%' then (select b.reportcarddate from ijasSummaryNo b where a.Reportnumber = b.Reportnumber) end as ijasDate, case when a.reportnumber like '2%' then (select c.Reportnumber from appraisalsummaryblue c where a.reportnumber = c.reportnumber) end as imacsRepNo from t_RegisterInfoTemp a Query works fine like this but when i add this (the one marked bold i get error) case when a.reportnumber like '2%' then (select c.Reportnumber from appraisalsummaryblue c where a.reportnumber = c.reportnumber) end as imacsRepNo,case when a.reportnumber like '2%' then (select c.Measurement from appraisalsummaryblue c where a.reportnumber = c.reportnumber) end as Measurement2
This is the error. Server: Msg 4414, Level 16, State 1, Line 1Could not allocate ancillary table for view or function resolution. The maximum number of tables in a query (260) was exceeded.
executing the first script listed below resulted in the error message (translation):
Message 7890, Level 16, Status 1, Line 1 Error when registrating Endpoint. Potential port conflict ...
use AdventureWorks; go CREATE ENDPOINT SQLEP_AWPersons STATE = STARTED AS HTTP ( PATH = '/AWpersons', AUTHENTICATION = (INTEGRATED), PORTS = (CLEAR), SITE = '*' ) FOR SOAP ( WEBMETHOD 'PersonInfo' (NAME='AdventureWorks.dbo.uspGetPersonInfo'), BATCHES = DISABLED, WSDL = DEFAULT, DATABASE = 'AdventureWorks', NAMESPACE = 'http://Adventure-Works/Persons' )
I changed the port in the script to 8084:
PORTS = (8084),
Error Message 102: Wrong Syntac near ')'.
I changed the port in the script to '8084':
Error Message 7888: The stated IPv6-Address is not supported. The server is potentially not configured for the IPv6 Connectivity or the address is not formated in an known IPv6-Format.
Hello, I want to get data from datatable as below. I am getting error: BC30516: Overload resolution failed because no accessible 'New' accepts this number of arguments. I did not understand what is wrong. Because everything is same as msdn library. my codebehind is: Imports System.Data Imports System.Data.Sql Imports System.Data.SqlClientPartial Class Default2 Inherits System.Web.UI.Page
Private Shared Function GetConnectionString() As String ' To avoid storing the connection string in your code, ' you can retrieve it from a configuration file. Return "Data Source=Database;Initial Catalog=otel;Integrated Security=True;Pooling=False" End FunctionProtected Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Me.LoadDim connectionString As String = _ GetConnectionString() ' Create a SqlConnection to the database.Using connection As SqlConnection = New SqlConnection(connectionString)
' Create a SqlDataAdapter for the Suppliers table.Dim mailsAdapter As SqlDataAdapter = _ New SqlDataAdapter() ' A table mapping names the DataTable.mailsAdapter.TableMappings.Add("Table", "Pages") connection.Open()Dim PagesCommand As SqlCommand = New SqlCommand( _"SELECT * FROM Pages", _ connection) PagesCommand.CommandType = CommandType.Text ' Set the SqlDataAdapter's SelectCommand. mailsAdapter.SelectCommand = PagesCommand ' Fill the DataSet. Dim dataSet1 As Dataset = New Dataset("Pages") 'ERROR MESSAGE HERE...........................................mailsAdapter.Fill(dataSet1) connection.Close()LblPageName.Text = CStr(dataSet1.Tables("Pages").Rows(0).Item(1)) TxtPageTitle.Text = CStr(dataSet1.Tables("Pages").Rows(0).Item(2))TxtPageSummary.Text = CStr(dataSet1.Tables("Pages").Rows(0).Item(3)) Rte1.Text = CStr(dataSet1.Tables("Pages").Rows(0).Item(4))TxtPageimgUrl.Text = CStr(dataSet1.Tables("Pages").Rows(0).Item(5)) End Using End Sub
In order to add a data source by using ODBC Administrator, programmatically i am using SQLConfigDataSource. Thus calling SQLConfigDataSource with the fOption set to either ODBC_ADD_DSN for creating a new DSN.
Following is the stattement specified in the source code. where type_of_driver = "Microsoft Access Driver (*.mdb)"; and parameters contains the data source source credentials information such as DSN, UID, PSW, FIL, Description, DataDirectory,DEFAULTDIR and DBQ all separated by " ".
after execution of below mentioned command an error is encountered i.e -1 is returned if the DataDirectory path exceeds certain nested directories link. for eg. the file path specified below.
C:My DocumentsClients CurrentAHW Netcare BenefitsDeliverables1-5 Results Chain - system LevelAlberta NetcareBenefits Logic System Level V01.rcm
Creating a datasource with the file name i.e Benefits Logic System Level V01 every time. rc = :: SQLConnect(hDbc, (unsigned char *)szSource, SQL_NTS, (unsigned char *)szUserName, SQL_NTS, (unsigned char *)szPassword, SQL_NTS);
Also following error message was encountered during execution of SQLConnect command.
/*szErrorMsg = 0x0012e834 "[Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver]General error Not enough information to connect to this DSN with SQLConnect. Use SQLDriverConnect."*/
Thus followed the instruction smentioned in the error message an dtried using SQL DriverConnect() in the following manner. rc = :: SQLDriverConnect(hDbc, NULL,(SQLCHAR *)"DSN=RCM",SQL_NTS,outstr, sizeof(outstr), &outstrlen,SQL_DRIVER_NOPROMPT);
Still an error is encountered but this time it returns a RETCODE of 100 whrease earlier it had returned -1.
Inform the procedure to be followed using SQLConnect when DataDirectory path is too long.
We have a winforms application with local rdlc reports. Â On Surface Windows 8 Pro devices only, reports render such that they are scaled down and don't fill the page. Â If resolution is lowered on the device, the report scales up to fill the page.
 This affects the appearance in print layout and well as the actual printed size.
If we export to pdf, it renders to fill the page (as expected). Â If you print to pdf or to printer, the scale is shrunken.
If we change the resolution settings so that "Make  text and other items larger or smaller" is set to small, the issue is resolved except the tablet is not very usable on this setting.Is this a bug?
