Delete-operation Performance Problem
Jul 23, 2005
Hi!
I'm experiencing the following experience problem with my SQL Server 2000.
Explanation a' la example;
1.
I insert data using my SP; EXEC dbo.up_DataInsert
This is fine, SQL Profiler duration only a few ms.
2.
I try to select the data.
select * from dbo.tblData where DataNumber = 283279
This is fine, SQL Profiler duration only a few ms.
3.
delete from dbo.tblData where DataNumber = 283279
This is NOT fine, SQL Profiler duration up to 50 seconds!!!
I have got a unique index with ignore duplicate key and the table has about
180.000 records.
What could be wrong here??
/Magnus
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jun 19, 2006
If tables are in relation (foreign key), then how should one proceed for deletion of a record from a master table?
how will the database itself tackle the problem? What should be done from the front end for this?
please help.......I urgently require a solution for this.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 20, 2002
I should add an Identity field (Identity=True) and a row version field(timestamp) to my table, and avoid to arrange tables into different databases, is it true in general?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 15, 2008
I've about 2-10 millions records to delete. Is there anyway to have this delete statement run faster?
while exists (select * from table_report WHERE report_date between @from_date and @to_date)
begin
DELETE TOP (10000) FROM table_report WHERE report_date between @from_date and @to_date
end
Thanks,
-Ash
View 9 Replies
View Related
Nov 20, 2013
I'm using SQL Server 2012 Analysis services in Tabular mode and connected to Oracle Database and while importing, I'm getting below error after importing some rows.
OLE DB or ODBC error: Accessor is not a parameter accessor.. The current operation was cancelled because another operation in the transaction failed.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 17, 2008
I use SQL2005 EE to capture the "In Progress Data" from the Devices and have connected it to the Main server-SQL2005 SE thro linked Server. I Run a Job that updates the Main server and Clears the "in Process Data".
Off late I have been seeing that the systems with SQL2005 EE have gone slow ? I have not investigated the reason. But wanted to find out if using this method ,should I need to take additional precautions ?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jan 15, 2008
I want to use "on delete cascade" in one of my tables but I'm worried though whether this can affect the performance when having millions of records. To explain more I'm working on a social networking website and I have two tables UserAccounts, in which I only keep the username and password and a few related fields, and Profiles in which I keep the profile data for users, I want to be sure that I won't have any records in the Profiles table without corresponding records in the UserAccounts table. Please see the DDL below to understand more the structure of the tables:
CREATE TABLE UserAccounts
(
UserID INT NOT NULL IDENTITY(1,1) PRIMARY KEY,
UserName VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL,
Password VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL,
--other fields (e.g. last login .. etc)
)
CREATE TABLE Profiles
(
UserID INT NOT NULL REFERENCES UserAccount(UserID),
-- other fields (e.g. birthdate, nationality .. etc)
)
Any suggestions are highly appreciated...
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 11, 2015
I have some simple files but they are failing because the delete history task is failing as it is looking for files in a non existent directory.
It is looking for files in C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQL10_50.INSTANCEMSSQLLog whereas it should be looking in C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQL10_50.MSSQLSERVERMSSQLLog
how I can get this corrected so I can get the Maintenance Plans to run correctly.
I have tried deleting and recreating the Plan but to no avail
View 0 Replies
View Related
May 19, 2012
I am using Master Data Service for couple of months now. I can load, update, merge and soft delete data in MDS. Occasionally we even have to hard delete data from MDS. If we keep on soft deleting records in a MDS table eventually there will be huge number of soft deleted records. Is there an easy way to hard delete all the soft deleted records from all MDS tables in a specific Model.
View 18 Replies
View Related
Oct 23, 2004
Hello:
Need some serious help with this one...
Background:
Am working on completing an ORM that can not only handles CRUD actions -- but that can also updates the structure of a table transparently when the class defs change. Reason for this is that I can't get the SQL scripts that would work for updating a software on SqlServer to be portable to other DBMS systems. Doing it by code, rather than SQL batch has a chance of making cross-platform, updateable, software...
Anyway, because it needs to be cross-DBMS capable, the constraints are that the system used must work for the lowest common denominator....ie, a 'recipe' of steps that will work on all DBMS's.
The Problem:
There might be simpler ways to do this with SqlServer (all ears :-) - just in case I can't make it cross platform right now) but, with simplistic DBMS's (SqlLite, etc) there is no way to ALTER table once formed: one has to COPY the Table to a new TMP name, adding a Column in the process, then delete the original, then rename the TMP to the original name.
This appears possible in SqlServer too --...as long as there are no CASCADE operations.
Truncate table doesn't seem to be the solution, nor drop, as they all seem to trigger a Cascade delete in the Foreign Table.
So -- please correct me if I am wrong here -- it appears that the operations would be
along the lines of:
a) Remove the Foreign Key references
b) Copy the table structure, and make a new temp table, adding the column
c) Copy the data over
d) Add the FK relations, that used to be in the first table, to the new table
e) Delete the original
f) Done?
The questions are:
a) How does one alter a table to REMOVE the Foreign Key References part, if it has no 'name'.
b) Anyone know of a good clean way to get, and save these constraints to reapply them to the new table. Hopefully with some cross platform ADO.NET solution? GetSchema etc appears to me to be very dbms dependant?
c) ANY and all tips on things I might run into later that I have not mentioned, are also greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Sky
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 13, 2006
I am having great difficulty with cascading deletes, delete triggers and referential integrity.
The database is in First Normal Form.
I have some tables that are child tables with two foreign keyes to two different parent tables, for example:
Table A
/
Table B Table C
/
Table D
So if I try to turn on cascading deletes for A/B, A/C, B/D and C/D relationships, I get an error that I cannot have cascading delete because it would create multiple cascade paths. I do understand why this is happening. If I delete a row in Table A, I want it to delete child rows in Table B and table C, and then child rows in table D as well. But if I delete a row in Table C, I want it to delete child rows in Table D, and if I delete a row in Table B, I want it to also delete child rows in Table D.
SQL sees this as cyclical, because if I delete a row in table A, both table B and table C would try to delete their child rows in table D.
Ok, so I thought, no biggie, I'll just use delete triggers. So I created delete triggers that will delete child rows in table B and table C when deleting a row in table A. Then I created triggers in both Table B and Table C that would delete child rows in Table D.
When I try to delete a row in table A, B or C, I get the error "Delete Statement Conflicted with COLUMN REFERENCE". This does not make sense to me, can anyone explain? I have a trigger in place that should be deleting the child rows before it attempts to delete the parent row...isn't that the whole point of delete triggers?????
This is an example of my delete trigger:
CREATE TRIGGER [DeleteA] ON A
FOR DELETE
AS
Delete from B where MeetingID = ID;
Delete from C where MeetingID = ID;
And then Table B and C both have delete triggers to delete child rows in table D. But it never gets to that point, none of the triggers execute because the above error happens first.
So if I then go into the relationships, and deselect the option for "Enforce relationship for INSERTs and UPDATEs" these triggers all work just fine. Only problem is that now I have no referential integrity and I can simply create unrestrained child rows that do not reference actual foreign keys in the parent table.
So the question is, how do I maintain referential integrity and also have the database delete child rows, keeping in mind that the cascading deletes will not work because of the multiple cascade paths (which are certainly required).
Hope this makes sense...
Thanks,
Josh
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 17, 2006
I'm trying to clean up a database design and I'm in a situation to where two tables need a FK but since it didn't exist before there are orphaned records.
Tables are:
Brokers and it's PK is BID
The 2nd table is Broker_Rates which also has a BID table.
I'm trying to figure out a t-sql statement that will parse through all the recrods in the Broker_Rates table and delete the record if there isn't a match for the BID record in the brokers table.
I know this isn't correct syntax but should hopefully clear up what I'm asking
DELETE FROM Broker_Rates
WHERE (Broker_Rates.BID <> Broker.BID)
Thanks
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2004
1. Use mssql server agent service to take the schedule
2. Use a .NET windows service with timers to call SqlClientConnection
above, which way would be faster and get a better performance?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 23, 2006
Hello Everyone,I have a very complex performance issue with our production database.Here's the scenario. We have a production webserver server and adevelopment web server. Both are running SQL Server 2000.I encounted various performance issues with the production server with aparticular query. It would take approximately 22 seconds to return 100rows, thats about 0.22 seconds per row. Note: I ran the query in singleuser mode. So I tested the query on the Development server by taking abackup (.dmp) of the database and moving it onto the dev server. I ranthe same query and found that it ran in less than a second.I took a look at the query execution plan and I found that they we'rethe exact same in both cases.Then I took a look at the various index's, and again I found nodifferences in the table indices.If both databases are identical, I'm assumeing that the issue is relatedto some external hardware issue like: disk space, memory etc. Or couldit be OS software related issues, like service packs, SQL Serverconfiguations etc.Here's what I've done to rule out some obvious hardware issues on theprod server:1. Moved all extraneous files to a secondary harddrive to free up spaceon the primary harddrive. There is 55gb's of free space on the disk.2. Applied SQL Server SP4 service packs3. Defragmented the primary harddrive4. Applied all Windows Server 2003 updatesHere is the prod servers system specs:2x Intel Xeon 2.67GHZTotal Physical Memory 2GB, Available Physical Memory 815MBWindows Server 2003 SE /w SP1Here is the dev serers system specs:2x Intel Xeon 2.80GHz2GB DDR2-SDRAMWindows Server 2003 SE /w SP1I'm not sure what else to do, the query performance is an order ofmagnitude difference and I can't explain it. To me its is a hardware oroperating system related issue.Any Ideas would help me greatly!Thanks,Brian T*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 26, 2007
this is my Delete Query NO 1
alter table ZT_Master disable trigger All
Delete ZT_Master WHERE TDateTime> = DATEADD(month,DATEDIFF(month,0,getdate())-(select Keepmonths from ZT_KeepMonths where id =1),0) AND TDateTime< DATEADD(month,DATEDIFF(month,0,getdate()),0)
alter table ZT_Master enable trigger All
I have troble in Delete Query No 2
here is a select statemnt , I need to delete them
select d.* from ZT_Master m, ZT_Detail d where (m.Prikey=d.MasterKey) And m.TDateTime> = DATEADD(month,DATEDIFF(month,0,getdate())-(select Keepmonths from ZT_KeepMonths where id =1),0) AND m.TDateTime< DATEADD(month,DATEDIFF(month,0,getdate()),0)
I tried modified it as below
delete d.* from ZT_Master m, ZT_Detail d where (m.Prikey=d.MasterKey) And m.TDateTime> = DATEADD(month,DATEDIFF(month,0,getdate())-(select Keepmonths from ZT_KeepMonths where id =1),0) AND m.TDateTime< DATEADD(month,DATEDIFF(month,0,getdate()),0)
but this doesn't works..
can you please help?
and can I combine these 2 SQL Query into one Sql Query? thank you
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 16, 2008
I'm using SqlDataSource and an Access database. Let's say I got two tables:user: userID, usernamemessage: userID, messagetextLet's say a user can register on my website, and leave several messages there. I have an admin page where I can select a user and delete all of his messages just by clicking one button.What would be the best (and easiest) way to make this?Here's my suggestion:I have made a "delete query" (with userID as parameter) in MS Access. It deletes all messages of a user when I type in the userID and click ok.Would it be possible to do this on my ASP.net page? If yes, what would the script look like?(yes, it is a newbie question)
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 16, 2013
The requirement is: I should allow single row delete from a table but not bulk delete. An audit table should get updated if there is any single delete or single update. So I wrote the triggers as follows: for single and bulk delete
ALTER TRIGGER [dbo].[TRG_Delete_Bulk_tbl_attendance]
ON [dbo].[tbl_attendance]
AFTER DELETE
AS
[code]...
When I try to run the website, the database error I am getting is:Transaction count after EXECUTE indicates that a COMMIT or ROLLBACK TRANSACTION statement is missing. Previous count = 0, current count = 1.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 20, 2007
I ran the following query in Query Analyzer on a machine running SQL Server 2000. I'm attempting to delete from a linked server running SQL Server 2005:
DELETE FROM sql2005.production.dbo.products
WHERE vendor='Foo'
AND productId NOT IN
(
SELECT productId FROM sql2000.staging.dbo.fooProductList
)
The status message (and @@ROWCOUNT) told me 8 rows were affected, but nothing was actually deleted; when I ran a SELECT with the same criteria as the DELETE, all 8 rows are still there. So, once more I tried the DELETE command. This time it told me 7 rows were affected; when I ran the SELECT again, 5 of the rows were still there. Finally, after running this exact same DELETE query 5 times, I was able to remove all 8 rows. Each time it would tell me that a different number of rows had been deleted, and in no case was that number accurate.
I've never seen anything like this before. Neither of the tables involved were undergoing any other changes. There's no replication going on, or anything else that should introduce any delays. And I run queries like this all day, involving every thinkable combination of 2000 and 2005 servers, that don't give me any trouble.
Does anyone have suggestions on what might cause this sort of behavior?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 20, 2007
Hi,
I have a problem with one report on my server. A user has requested that I exclude him from receiving a timed email subscription to several reports. I was able to amend all the subscriptions except one. When I try to remove his email address from the subscription I receive this error:
An internal error occurred on the report server. See the error log for more details. (rsInternalError) Get Online Help
For more information about this error navigate to the report server on the local server machine, or enable remote errors
Online no help couldn't offer any advice at all, so I thought I'd just delete the subscription and recreate it again, but I receive the same message. "Okay, no problem, I'll just delete the report and redeploy it and set up the subscription so all the other users aren't affected", says I. "Oh, no!", says the report server, and then it give me this message:
System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapException: Server was unable to process request. ---> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Only members of sysadmin role are allowed to update or delete jobs owned by a different login. at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection) at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj) at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.Run(RunBehavior runBehavior, SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream, BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler, TdsParserStateObject stateObj) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.FinishExecuteReader(SqlDataReader ds, RunBehavior runBehavior, String resetOptionsString) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReaderTds(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, Boolean async) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReader(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, String method, DbAsyncResult result) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.InternalExecuteNonQuery(DbAsyncResult result, String methodName, Boolean sendToPipe) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery() at Microsoft.ReportingServices.Library.InstrumentedSqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery() at Microsoft.ReportingServices.Library.DBInterface.DeleteObject(String objectName) at Microsoft.ReportingServices.Library.RSService._DeleteItem(String item) at Microsoft.ReportingServices.Library.RSService.ExecuteBatch(Guid batchId) at Microsoft.ReportingServices.WebServer.ReportingService2005.ExecuteBatch() --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
What's even weirder is that I'm the owner and creator of the report and I'm a system admin and content manager on the report server and I set up the subscription when the report was initially deployed. Surely I should have sufficient rights to fart around with this subscription/report as I see fit?
I have rebooted the server, redeployed the report, checked credentials on the data source and tried amending and deleting from both the report manager and management studio but still I am prevented from doing so.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Paul
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 2, 2000
I am running SQL Server 7. I have an user that need to run the Set Identity On a table, and he gets an error message:
Server: Msg 8104. The current user is not the database or object owner of table 'tpartners'. Cannot perform SET operation.
I can grant this user with DBO user role, then he can edit anyting on the database.
Is there a work around that he can run the Set cmd and I don't need to grant him the DBO user role?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
HiI have a database with full recovery model.Every night at 11.00pm performs full backup, and dayly every 3 hoursperforms differential backup, and trasnactional log backup performsevery 15 minutes during a day.I am interested what operations i can not recover from log ordifferential backup.I saw that when i drop table i can recover it from log backup, but isthere some operation that can not be recoverThanks a lotAlex*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 6, 2007
Dear friends, I was not able to find any perfect toolbox item to use "not in" operation on my selected columns, also how can we use multiple join conditions in the merge join item? Thanks,
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 23, 2006
First, this is not my code.
This one is weird and I am missing something fundamental on this one. A developer was getting a timeout with this...
CREATE PROCEDURE p_CM_DeleteBatch
(
@SubmitterTranID VARCHAR(50)
)
AS
DECLARE
@COUNT INT,
@COMMIT INT
SET @COUNT = 0
SET @COMMIT = 1 --DO NOT CHANGE THIS. The Operation will be commited only when this value is 1
select @COUNT = COUNT(*) from claimsreceived
where (claimstatus NOT IN ('Keyed', 'Imported')) AND
SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@COUNT = 0) --This means that that Claims under this Batch have not been adjudicated & it is safe to delete
BEGIN
BEGIN TRANSACTION
DELETE FROM INVOICECLAIMMAPPING WHERE CLMRECDID IN (SELECT DISTINCT CLMRECDID FROM CLAIMSRECEIVED WHERE SUBMITTERTRANID = @SUBMITTERTRANID)
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsPayment WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsPaymentServices WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsreceivedPayorServices where ClmRecdPyID in (SELECT ClmRecdPyID
FROM ClaimsReceivedPayors
WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID)
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsReceivedPayors WHERE ClmRecdid in (SELECT ClmRecdID
FROM ClaimsReceived
WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID)
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsReceivedServices WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsReceived WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM BATCHLOGCLAIMS WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
IF (@COMMIT = 1)
BEGIN
--ROLLBACK TRANSACTION --For Testing Purpose ONLY
COMMIT TRANSACTION
RETURN (0)
END
ELSE
BEGIN
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
RETURN (-1)
END
END
ELSE
BEGIN
RaisError ('This Batch cannot be deleted. It has claim(s) which has been Adjudicated', 16, 1)
END
GO
I applied a couple of indices and got ride of the uncorrelated subqueries
CREATE PROCEDURE p_CM_DeleteBatch
(
@SubmitterTranID VARCHAR(50)
)
AS
DECLARE
@COUNT INT,
@COMMIT INT
SET @COUNT = 0
SET @COMMIT = 1 --DO NOT CHANGE THIS. The Operation will be commited only when this value is 1
select @COUNT = COUNT(*) from claimsreceived
where (claimstatus NOT IN ('Keyed', 'Imported')) AND
SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@COUNT = 0) --This means that that Claims under this Batch have not been adjudicated & it is safe to delete
BEGIN
BEGIN TRANSACTION
DELETE INVOICECLAIMMAPPING
FROM INVOICECLAIMMAPPING
JOIN CLAIMSRECEIVED
ON INVOICECLAIMMAPPING.CLMRECDID = CLAIMSRECEIVED.CLMRECDID
WHERE CLAIMSRECEIVED.SUBMITTERTRANID = @SUBMITTERTRANID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsPayment
WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsPaymentServices WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE ClaimsreceivedPayorServices
FROM ClaimsreceivedPayorServices
JOIN ClaimsReceivedPayors
ON ClaimsreceivedPayorServices.ClmRecdPyID = ClaimsReceivedPayors.ClmRecPyID
WHERE ClaimsReceivedPayors.SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE ClaimsReceivedPayors
FROM ClaimsReceivedPayors
JOIN ClaimsReceived
ON ClaimsReceivedPayors.ClmRecdid = ClaimsReceived.ClmRecdid
WHERE ClaimsReceived.SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsReceivedServices WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsReceived WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM BATCHLOGCLAIMS WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
IF (@COMMIT = 1)
BEGIN
--ROLLBACK TRANSACTION --For Testing Purpose ONLY
COMMIT TRANSACTION
RETURN (0)
END
ELSE
BEGIN
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
RETURN (-1)
END
END
ELSE
BEGIN
RaisError ('This Batch cannot be deleted. It has claim(s) which has been Adjudicated', 16, 1)
END
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER OFF
GO
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
Suddenly this constraint was being violated with the change
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[ClaimsReceivedPayorServices] ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_ClaimsReceivedPayorServices_CLAIMSRECEIVEDPAYOR S] FOREIGN KEY
(
[ClmRecdPyID]
) REFERENCES [CLAIMSRECEIVEDPAYORS] (
[CLMRECPYID]
)
Is the delete on ClaimsReceivedPayors starting before the delete on ClaimsreceivedPayorServices finishes? If so why would it matter between the join and subquery? This one is making me depressed because I can not explain it.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 3, 2008
Hi all
Need some advice solving a little problem I have with my database!
Current setup:
I have a person table that is made up of 39 columns. I also allow for person records to be deleted but I do this by having another table I call LogicallyDeletedrecords. This table is made up of the PersonId, Reason for deletion/suppression and a date time stamp. To access Live records I created a view based on my Person table which contains a WHERE clause to exclude records that exist in the LogicallyDeletedrecords. Similarly, I have another view DeadPersonData which contains Person records that have been removed. Hope it all makes sense so far! Now on to my worries!
The problem:
My Person table contains 9+ million records. The LogicallyDeletedrecords table has 500k+ but I anticipate further growth over the coming weeks/months. My worry is that my LivePersonData view will be too slow to access as my LogicallyDeletedrecords table grows. What’s more, as part of my Load routine, I have to make sure that Person data loaded on to the system is excluded if that same person exists as a deleted member. Both of these actions could slow down my system as the deleted table grows.
My thoughts:
I’ve been thinking of physically deleting dead Person records from my person table (possibly creating an archive table to hold them). But then if I delete them how do I cross check the details when new Person details get loaded?! As I said, my current LogicallyDeletedrecords table holds the PersonId, ReasonDeleted and CreationStamp. The only way is to add further columns which I use to match Person Details?
Any design suggestions would be welcome!
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 12, 2007
I am trying to write one sql statement that deletes from two tables. Is it possible ? If yes, any thoughts ?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 18, 2008
Why do I get the message "Operation can't be completed?" when I try to save a stored procedure!!! When I create a new stored procedure and copy the code into it it works fine!
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 18, 2003
I have a sp that creates a #temp table and performs a bulk insert.
CREATE TABLE #template (template varchar(8000))
EXEC ('bulk INSERT #template FROM "' + @filename + '"')
SET @html = (SELECT template FROM #template)
DROP TABLE #template
...
When I access this sp with any other user than 'sa' I get this error message:
The current user is not the database or object owner of table '#template'. Cannot perform SET operation.
I've been everywhere (with no success) in the sql srv admin to look for the appropriate check box to allow another named user to access this sp.
Can anyone help?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 4, 2001
On SQL 2k, How can I set my DTS package, which imports a 3 million row .TXT file to a table, as a NON-LOGGED operation?
(LOGGING is taking tooooo long!! I will be sure to run a full DB backup when the job completes.)
thx-
BT
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 6, 2006
I was looking into some of the System stored procedures like sp_denylogin, sp_grantLogin etc. I found bit wise operations like
update master.dbo.sysxlogins set xstatus = (xstatus & ~1) | 2, xdate2 = getdate()
where name = @loginame and srvid IS NULL
How does the bitwise NOT(~) works with different datatypes like INT, SMALLINT and TINYINT?
Look at the following sample code and result. I just wanted to understand how it works with int and smallint
declare @a int
declare @b smallint
declare @c tinyint
select @a = 1, @b = 1, @c = 1
select @a=~@a, @b= ~@b, @c= ~@c
select @a, @b, @c
Result
~~~~~
-2-2254
Thanks in advance
Gnana
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 18, 2004
hello,
I have a problem where I am calling the BCP utility to write a table to a file. I then need to delete the rows of the table. but not all of them. This all works fine. I've been asked to place this into a transaction..incase a piece fails. When I do that...SQL server hangs. I must shutdown SQL Server.
Any idea why that would happen. I am using the xp_cmdshell stored procedure to invoke bcp utility within a stored procdure. The procedure is executed every 15 minutes to provide files to an outboard system.
Salik.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 14, 2008
IDENTITY_INSERT is already ON for table 'Elbalazo.dbo.DeliveryOption'. Cannot perform SET operation for table 'City'
Here's my entire script:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
/*Disable Constraints & Triggers*/
exec sp_MSforeachtable 'ALTER TABLE ? NOCHECK CONSTRAINT ALL'
exec sp_MSforeachtable 'ALTER TABLE ? DISABLE TRIGGER ALL'
/*Perform delete operation on all table for cleanup*/
exec sp_MSforeachtable 'DELETE ?'
/*Enable Constraints & Triggers again*/
--exec sp_MSforeachtable 'ALTER TABLE ? CHECK CONSTRAINT ALL'
exec sp_MSforeachtable 'ALTER TABLE ? ENABLE TRIGGER ALL'
/*Reset Identity on tables with identity column*/
exec sp_MSforeachtable 'IF OBJECTPROPERTY(OBJECT_ID(''?''), ''TableHasIdentity'') = 1 BEGIN DBCC CHECKIDENT (''?'',RESEED,0) END'
-- City
SET IDENTITY_INSERT City ON
INSERT INTO Elbalazo.dbo.City (
[CityID]
,[CityName]
,[CountyID]
,[Active])
SELECT [CityID],[CityName],[CountyID],1
FROM [ElbalazoProduction].dbo.tbl_City
SET IDENTITY_INSERT City OFF
-- State
SET IDENTITY_INSERT [State] ON
INSERT INTO Elbalazo.dbo.State (
[StateID]
,[State]
,[Active])
SELECT [StateID],[State],1
FROM [ElbalazoProduction].dbo.tbl_State
SET IDENTITY_INSERT [State] OFF
-- NumberOfPeopleOption
SET IDENTITY_INSERT NumberOfPeopleOption ON
INSERT INTO [Elbalazo].[dbo].[NumberOfPeopleOption]
([NumberOfPeopleOptionID]
,[NumberOfPeopleNameOption]
,[Active])
SELECT [NumberOfPeopleID], [NumberOfPeopleName],1
FROM [ElbalazoProduction].dbo.tbl_NumberOfPeople
SET IDENTITY_INSERT NumberOfPeopleOption OFF
-- DeliveryOption
SET IDENTITY_INSERT DeliveryOption ON
INSERT INTO [Elbalazo].[dbo].[DeliveryOption]
([DeliveryOptionID]
,[DeliveryOptionName]
,[Active])
SELECT [DeliveryOptionID], [DeliveryOptionName],1
FROM [ElbalazoProduction].dbo.tbl_DeliveryOption
SET IDENTITY_INSERT DeliveryOption OFF
-- User
SET IDENTITY_INSERT [User] ON
INSERT INTO [Elbalazo].[dbo].[User]
([UserID]
,[FirstName]
,[LastName]
,[Address1]
,[Address2]
,[CityID]
,[StateID]
,[Zip]
,[PhoneAreaCode]
,[PhonePrefix]
,[PhoneSuffix]
,[Email]
,[CreateDate]
,[Active])
SELECT [CustomerID]
,[FirstName]
,[LastName]
,[AddressLine1]
,NULL
,[CityID]
,[StateID]
,[Zip]
,[PhoneAreaCode]
,[PhonePrefix]
,[PhoneSuffix]
,[EmailPrefix] + '@' + [EmailSuffix]
,[CreateDate]
,1
FROM [ElbalazoProduction].dbo.tbl_Customer
SET IDENTITY_INSERT [User] OFF
-- EntreeOption
SET IDENTITY_INSERT EntreeOption ON
INSERT INTO [Elbalazo].[dbo].[EntreeOption]
([EntreeOptionID]
,[EntreeOptionName]
,[Active])
SELECT [EntreeOptionID]
,[EntreeOptionName]
,1
FROM [ElbalazoProduction].dbo.tbl_EntreeOption
SET IDENTITY_INSERT EntreeOption OFF
-- CateringOrder
SET IDENTITY_INSERT CateringOrder ON
INSERT INTO [Elbalazo].[dbo].[CateringOrder]
([CateringOrderID]
,[UserID]
,[NumberOfPeopleID]
,[BeanOptionID]
,[TortillaOptionID]
,[CreateDate]
,[Notes]
,[EventDate]
,[DeliveryOptionID])
SELECT [CateringOrderID]
,[CustomerID]
,[NumberOfPeopleID]
,[BeanOptionID]
,[TortillaOptionID]
,[CreateDate]
,[Notes]
,[EventDate]
,[DeliveryOptionID]
FROM [ElbalazoProduction].dbo.tbl_CateringOrder
SET IDENTITY_INSERT CateringOrder OFF
-- CateringOrder_EntreeItem
SET IDENTITY_INSERT CateringOrderEntreeItem ON
INSERT INTO [Elbalazo].[dbo].[CateringOrderEntreeItem]
([CateringOrderEntreeItemID]
,[CateringOrderID]
,[EntreeItemID])
SELECT [CateringORder_EntreeItemID]
,[CateringOrderID]
,[EntreeItemID]
FROM [ElbalazoProduction].dbo.tbl_CateringOrder_EntreeItem
SET IDENTITY_INSERT CateringOrderEntreeItem OFF
select * from BeanOption
select * from CateringItemIncluded
select * from CateringOrder
select * from CateringOrderEntreeItem
select * from CateringOrderEntrees
select * from City
select * from Country
select * from DeliveryOption
select * from EntreeOption
select * from NumberOfPeopleOption
select * from [State]
select * from [User]
View 15 Replies
View Related
Dec 14, 2007
Can anybody explain whether Delete and Truncate are Logged Operations?
On some site, I came accross Truncate is not Logged Operation, on some site, Truncate is Logged Operation.
Can anybody explain, what exactly it is?
Thanks in advance,
Mahesh
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 25, 2008
A standard IN operation is like doing a series of OR statements in your WHERE clause. Is there anything like an IN statement that is like using a series of AND statements instead?
I tried looking into the ALL operator but that didn't seem to do it or else I just couldn't figure out how to use it correctly.
View 7 Replies
View Related
