Hey Guys,I have been trying to work out how I would delete a record that was created more then 10 minutes ago.I can use this to delete records older then a day.DELETE FROM DownloadQueue WHERE Downloading = '0' AND QueuePos = '0' AND DateTime < GETDATE() - 1Just need something now that will do it for just 10 minutes.Cheers.
View 1 RepliesI have a backup job that has failed.
The database size is 20.6 GB and the Transaction logs are 135MB
The amount of disk space I have left is 3.65MB. Which I know is not going to work.
However on the maintenance plan it is suppose to remove files older than 1 day.
I am wondering if a job works like this:
Step 1 create backup file
Step 2 Create Transaction Log Back up
Step 3 Delete old backup file
Step 4 Delete old Transaction log back up
Which tell me I would need to have double amount of disk space to accommodate 2 20 GB backup file and 2 135MB Transaction log file.
Is this correct??
Also is there a way that I can have step 3,4 done first.
Lystra
Hi,
I have a table which has around 50,000 rows.
Can I delete the rows older than one year?
If no, Can I delete the last 25,000 rows (older rows) from the table?
Can you assist me with the SQL Statement to do this?
Thanks
Santhosh
Friends -
I am looking for a windows script (bat file) to delete backup files which are older than 2 days.
Please provide scripts on this.
Appreciate your support
Cheers :)
Satish
I am using the backup task and backing up a database but want to delete all backup files older than 5 days old. I am using the file task for this and have built the path in a variable but am trying to use a wildcard for the time. I am getting illegal character in path. How can I go about this.
I currently have E:MSSQL.1MSSQLBackupdatabasename_backup_20070309*.bak in my input variable and am trying to delete the file databasename_backup_200703091532.bak
Hey All,I think this is something like locking, but not quite. I need to select a record in a database and display the information to the end user. The end user has a few minutes to review it before giving the ok at which point I will update the record.However, while the user is reviewing the record, i dont want anyone else to be able to grab that record. I also want to make sure that if the user doesnt submit the page, that the record will be freed up and not indefinitely marked as taken.What would be the best way to do this? This is with .net 2.0 and sql2000
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a table with following data
(Id, date ,time)
11 2015/8/1
12:20:00
11
2015/8/1 12:21:00
11 2015/8/1
18:05:20
12 2015/8/1
11:20:00
12 2015/8/1
11:21:00
12 2015/8/1
18:10:20
I need the table with following record only
(Id, date ,time)
11 2015/8/1
12:20:00
11 2015/8/1
18:05:20
12 2015/8/1
11:20:00
12 2015/8/1
18:10:20
I have three tables
1. membership table(aspnet_membership table)
2. User Contacts table
3. Address table
These three table have relation ship with one another through a UserId field.
How will you set up cascaded delete on these tables, Like if I delete a user in the membership table I want the related records in the other tables to be deleted as well. Cascaded delete is it something done through code, or is it definde when the tables are created.
Please advice.
Hey Guys,I have Performance Monitor running and storing the network usage to my MsSQL database, and this is done a few times a minute. I have a page that then shows show much of my bandwidth is being used. As you can gather, the database quickly starts filling up with hundrreds of records so I could do with a script that delete these records. I cant simply delete all records because that would cause my webpage to fail so I need a way to delete all records apart from the latest one. Wondering if anyone would know how I could do this?
View 3 Replies View Relatedhi to all,
How to delete duplicate record in the recordset?
Thanks...
Hi SQL gurus,
I have a form that depending on the outcome, will either add, update or delete a record.
1) If there IS NO record of "this" and "that" and Request("x") <> "" it will add a new record.
2) If there IS a record for "this" and "that" and Request("x") <> "" it will update column 1,2,3 or 4.
3) If there is a record for "this" and "that" and Request("x") = "" it will delete the record.
My problem is if there is a value in request("1") it works fine, but if there is no value in ("1") and there is a value in 2, 3, or 4 it will delete the record.
If request("1") <> "" OR request("2") <> "" OR request("3") <> "" OR request("4") <> "" Then
sSQL = "SELECT * FROM some_column WHERE this = '" & request("this) & "' and that = '" & request("that) & "'"
oRS.Open sSQL,oConn,adOpenKeySet,adLockOptimistic
If oRS.EOF Then
oRS.Addnew
oRS.Fields("this") = request("this")
ors.Fields("that") = request("that")
Else
ors.Movefirst
End If
oRS.fields("1") = request("1")
oRS.fields("2") = request("2")
oRS.fields("3") = request("3")
oRS.fields("4") = request("4")
oRS.Update
oRS.Close
Else
sSQL = "Delete from some_table Where this = '" & '" & request("this) & "' & "' AND that = '" & '" & request("that) & "' & "'"
objCmd.ActiveConnection = oConn
objCmd.CommandType = adCmdText
objCmd.CommandText = sSQL
objCmd.Execute
End if
Hope I explained that okay.
Hi All,I am using Microsoft SQL Enterprise Manager version 8.0 and havecreated a view from a combination of 4 different tables. I would liketo be able to go into sql and open the view and select a row anddelete that row however this seem impossible right now. I am not sureif it's possible to delete a row from a view?? Or could it be thatthese tables are all interconnected and in order to delete a recordthat is joined to one or more of the tables it has to be deleted atthe top level of the join heirarchy etc etc. (do you understand what imean?) Can this be done??Thanks in advance,Erin
View 4 Replies View Relatedhai dears i want to delete a row from the table on the basis of key sent in beusers obj
"connection myConn = new connection();" this is ma own class that establishes the connetion which works fine in other caseseg insert
'' it shows no error or exception ' but do not delete record
so plz tell me how to do this...
or whats wrong in this
public void delete(BEusers obj)
{
connection myConn = new connection();
oCommand = new SqlCommand("sp_delete_tbl_users_by_userid",myConn.sqlCon);
oCommand.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure;
try {
myConn.OpenConnection();
sp = oCommand.Parameters.Add("@User_Id", SqlDbType.VarChar);
sp.Size = 20;
sp.Value = obj.user_id;
oCommand.ExecuteNonQuery();
}
catch (Exception oException)
{ throw oException; }
finally { myConn.CloseConnection(); }
}
Hi ,
i am using sql server 2005.
i have one table where i need to find records that have same citycode and hospitalcode and doctorcode then delete the record keeping only one record of them
my problem is table structure have idendtity column which is unique.
that is m table structure is something like
recid citycode hospcode doctorcode otherdesp
1 0001 hp001 d0001 ...
2 0002 hp002 d0002 ...
3 0001 hp001 d0001 ...
4 0002 hp002 d0002 ...
please suggest
thank you
Hi,
I've noticed that after the first record from a ResultSet is deleted, HasRows property throws an exception like "The current row was deleted." Method ReadFirst() throws similar exception as well.
More details:
1. Create a ResultSet: ExecuteResultSet(ResultSetOptions.Updatable | ResultSetOptions.Scrollable | ResultSetOptions.Sensitive)
2. Let's say, there is no records in the resultset. Insert two new ones. Then call: ReadAbsolute(0); Delete(); HasRows; and the exception is thrown.
3. Then you can call ReadFirst() or Read with the same result.
4. Now call ReadAbsolute(0). It returns true. Call HasRows, ReadFirst() or Read() and you will get the exception each time.
I tried to explain this with the fact that Delete() doesn't change the current position of the ResultSet. But I don't see why that would mess the HasRows property or why after ReadAbsolute(0) retuns true, HasRows or ReadFirst() doesn't work.
Could anybody tell me what the problem is?
Thank you.
Hi,
I've noticed that after the first record from a ResultSet is deleted, HasRows property throws an exception like "The current row was deleted." Method ReadFirst() throws similar exception as well.
More details:
1. Create a ResultSet: ExecuteResultSet(ResultSetOptions.Updatable | ResultSetOptions.Scrollable | ResultSetOptions.Sensitive)
2. Let's say, there is no records in the resultset. Insert two new ones. Then call: ReadAbsolute(0); Delete(); HasRows; and the exception is thrown.
3. Then you can call ReadFirst() or Read with the same result.
4. Now call ReadAbsolute(0). It returns true. Call HasRows, ReadFirst() or Read() and you will get the exception each time.
I tried to explain this with the fact that Delete() doesn't change the current position of the ResultSet. But I don't see why that would mess the HasRows property or why after ReadAbsolute(0) retuns true, HasRows or ReadFirst() doesn't work.
Could anybody tell me what the problem is?
Thank you.
I am using the tables created by the aspnet_regsql.exe tool for security. Basically, I need to ensure that an account named Administrator is never deleted. I also have a role named administrator, and I need to make sure that Administrator is never removed from the administrator role.Can I create a trigger to ensure that the Administrator is never deleted and that the Administrator is never removed from the Administrator role? I know it will probably be two separate triggers: one on the aspnet_users table and one on the aspnet_usersinroles table.Thanks a lot for the help!
View 1 Replies View RelatedI can not get this stored procedure to delete my records...
I have a
contact table
RecordID
FirstName
LastName
etc
and a Address table
RecordID
Street
Zip
Town
Country
And a Relation table
RecordID
ContactID
AddressID
CreateDate
set ANSI_NULLS ON
set QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[bc_Contact_Delete]
@ContactID int
AS
--SET NOCOUNT ON
BEGIN TRY
BEGIN TRANSACTION -- Start the transaction
-- Delete all Adresses
DELETE FROM [Address]
WHERE
RecordId in (SELECT ca.AdressId from [ContactAddress] ca
where
ca.ContactID = @ContactID)
-- Delete all Relations
DELETE FROM [ContactAdress]
WHERE ContactID = @ContactID
--- Delete Kontakt
DELETE FROM [Contact] WHERE (([RecordId] = @ContactID))
COMMIT TRANSACTION
END TRY
BEGIN CATCH
-- Whoops, there was an error
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
-- Raise an error with the
-- details of the exception
DECLARE @ErrMsg nvarchar(4000),
@ErrSeverity int
SELECT @ErrMsg = ERROR_MESSAGE(),
@ErrSeverity = ERROR_SEVERITY()
RAISERROR(@ErrMsg, @ErrSeverity, 1)
END CATCH
RETURN
My Errormessage is
The DELETE statement conflicted with the REFERENCE constraint "FK_bc_ContactAdress_bc_Address". The conflict occurred in database "bContacts", table "dbo.ContactAddress", column 'AdressID'.
Can someone please post me an advice?
I can't delete records for a SQL Server table when I attached the table to Microsoft Access 97. I time out when I try to delete the record. However I can query the table.
I use the standard ODBC setup, do I need to do anything else beside using the standard Access link.
Thanks in advance
Hi all,
(I am using SQL Server 2005)
I have created a new 'CUSTOMERS' table and created a colum 'CustomerID' as an Identity column.
Now, a problem I find is that when I delete a particular record, its Identity value is used automatically for the New record I insert later!
I do not want to re-use the already used Identity value.
I just want to have the last CustomerID to be higher that all the previous ones.
Is there any way to do this?
Thanking you in advance,
Tomy
My table as data as follow,
IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM sys.objects WHERE object_id = OBJECT_ID(N'[dbo].[table_Data]') AND type in (N'U'))
DROP TABLE [dbo].[table_Data]
GO
/****** Object: Table [dbo].[table_Data] Script Date: 04/21/2015 22:07:49 ******/
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM sys.objects WHERE object_id = OBJECT_ID(N'[dbo].[table_Data]') AND type in (N'U'))
[code].....
Hi
i have to delete the master table data without deleting the child table records,is there any solution for this, parent table has relation with the child table.
regards
vinod.t.v
/****** Object: StoredProcedure [dbo].[dbo.ServiceLog] Script Date: 07/18/2014 14:30:59 ******/
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
ALTER proc [dbo].[ServiceLogPurge]
-- Purge records dbo.ServiceLog older than 3 months:
-- Purge records in small portions to avoid locking production tables
-- for a long time. The process takes longer, but can co-exist with
-- normal usage of the tables.
[Code] ...
*** Getting this error below when executing the code ***
Msg 102, Level 15, State 1, Procedure ServiceLogPurge, Line 45
Incorrect syntax near 'Failed:'.
I have an old Compaq Presario walmart pc. The stats on it are: 750MHz Duron, 512MB RAM, currently have 20GB and 30GB hard drives and planning on upgrading HD (100GB+), onboard nvidia vanta (8mb tnt2). If I get a larger hard drive, XP Pro, and put SQL Server Express on this computer, would I be able to get things done, or will this be extremely slowed down?
Thanks,
Nate
Hi All
Can anyone help me to keep track of older view or stored Procedure that has been altered so that I can compare the two and make out the changes that have been made.At present I 'm able to get just the altered view or storedProcedure but how to know that what has been changed.
This will be somewhat similar to Instead if and after in DML trigger but DDL triggers doesn't supports it.If anyone is aware of something then please help
THANKS in advance
Anisha
Hi Guys,
I am really stuck on exactly how I can do this. I can sudo it in my mind but can't figure out how I would code it.
What i want to do is select all records from a table that the log_date is older than 7 days.
If I was comparing a date i would imagine i would do something like
log_date < NOW()-7
I have looked at:
SELECT player_name, player_last_logon_date,DATEDIFF(day, player_last_logon_date, GETDATE()) AS NumberOfDays from player
select player_name, player_last_logon_date, datepart(dd,player_last_logon_date) from player
but I dont think either is really right. any and all advice would be great!
Thanks
Is it possible to send a email after a certain date has pass by. And 2 days after the email has been sent the post should be removed if the member doesn't answer the message.
example: The posts should not be older then 2 months. When they get older than 2 months the SQL-Server detects this post and sends a messegae to the member if he wants to renew it. If he ignors it for 2 days after the email the post will be removed from the database. (Some posts have images also, They should also be removed from the harddrive)
Is this possible in MSSQL-Server to send email?
If someone could tell me how to create this.
Hello ,
I am little confused in writing the exact query i.e filling the correct details in the query .
To simplify let me explain....
I am using the query as
delete MYTABLE
where datediff(dd,loaddate,getdate())>5
I have a table now with loadate column which gets the default date and time . The loadate shows correct date and time when the data was imported in the table .
Now suppose if i want to delete previous 5 days records from today
( for e.g today is 20/08/2002 3:40:00 PM ) ideally it should delete all records which are 5 days older from today . i.e from 20/08/2002 3:40:00 PM to 15/08/2002 3:40:00 PM )
But when i execute the datediff command , it deletes the records previous than 15/08/2002 till 15/08/2002.
The records from 15/08/2002 to 20/08/2002 remain intact .
I am getting some different results .
Am i missing something in the query or i am confused about the calculation of the dates the datediff command performs .
Is the logic correct or i am missing someting important ?
Thanks and Regards
Admin001
I am in the process of moving a database to a new location. My problem is that I do not have the most recent full backup file. I have a previous full backup file and I also have all of the transaction log backups from the time of the old backup to the present time.
My question is, do I need the most recent backup to restore the database, or can I do it with the older backup plus the transaction log backups?
Thanks in advance.
Ok in SQL 2000 this is within the maintaince plan, where as i have to create a seprate one for sql 2005 being i assume the 'clean up history' I choose the backup andrestore option choose 2 weeks and then run the job once created it runs sucssessfully but yet it dosnt delete a thing. I have backups going back almost 2 months now.
What on earth am i not doing?
Thanks in advanced
Hello,
Can I install SQL Express on Windows 2003 server which also has SQL Server 2000?
I already have .NET 2.0 Framework installed.
Should I download the full version of SSE?
Thanks
Frank
Hi ,
I have a scheduled job which does an text file import in my database . The data gets appended in my table every day from this import job .
Since my table is growing every day , i want to truncate the table after the data has been collected for three months i.e 90 days . The table will be empty and the new data will flow in through the import .
Any thoughts how to do it through query and schedule it ???
Thanks
So I've been monitoring long-running transactions on a SQL Server that hosts a couple of vendor-supplied databases that look after our factory.Today I noticed a pair that have confused my Excel spreadsheet (that I've been using to analyze these transactions).So here's the weird thing that I spotted. Given this query:
SELECT p.spid, p.login_time, at.transaction_begin_time, datediff(second, p.login_time, at.transaction_begin_time) as [difference]
FROM sys.sysprocesses AS p INNER JOIN
sys.dm_tran_session_transactions AS st ON st.session_id = p.spid INNER JOIN
sys.dm_tran_active_transactions AS at ON st.transaction_id = at.transaction_id
[code]....
I had a look in the event log on the server, which had just been rebooted at around that time. It seems that the clock got changed on boot-up, with the size of it quite surprising. This meant that these processes were able to start their transactions *before* they logged on. Hopefully this doesn't cause any other weird problems.So I've requested an investigation about time synchronization on our virtualization hosts... and in the mean time, have set the SQL Server services to 'delayed start'.