Derived Table: for each Item that requires stock items, 1st column
should receive the ItemNo (from Items), subsequent columns should receive the
details from StockDetails via the common key field 'StockCode'.
I have so far used a 'Fetch' cursor to find all occurrences of a StockCode
within the Items table, but have been unable to figure out how to first add
the ItemNo into the temporary table.
Code is as follows:
... build #tmp_Stock
DECLARE stock_cursor CURSOR FOR
SELECT StockCode, ItemNo
FROM Items
WHERE FtNum = @FtNum
ORDER BY ItemNo
OPEN stock_cursor
FETCH NEXT FROM stock_cursor
INTO @StockCode, @ItemNo
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
INSERT INTO #tmp_Stock
-- wish to insert ItemNo = @ItemNo here --
SELECT *
FROM ControlledStock
WHERE StockCode = @StockCode
FETCH NEXT FROM stock_cursor
INTO @Stockcode, @ItemNo
END
Of course there may be a much simpler way to do this!
Your help would be greatly appreciated either way.
--
Message posted via SQLMonster.com
http://www.sqlmonster.com/Uwe/Forum...eneral/200510/1
create multiple INNER JOIN on derived tables as I have written below or use a #temp table for all derived tables and use them into JOIN. This below query is also very hard to understand what is going on .
How can i return multiple resultsets from SQLServer. For ex, if we pass EmpNo to my storedprocedure it should return his salary details(from Sal table) and Attendance details(attendance table).
I have read a lot in favor and recommendation of returning multiple resultsets. But now I have to implement it with a scenario. I have a Parent Table named "Books" and a Child one named "Volumes". A book can have multiple volumes. Now I want to display the list of Books with their Volumes pagewise. How can I implement that procdure.
I have a question about SQL Reporting Services. I have a stored procedure which returns multiple resultsets (multiple select). In my reporting services project I have a dataset that connects to this procedure. But, when I execute it in the Data tab, I only get the first resultset. So can't I have more resultsets? I can't use more datasets (that have the selects in the procedure) because the procedure is complicated and has many calculation. I've managed to get all the selects in only one and the reporting services in working in this way. How about many resultsets in a dataset?
how to declare multiple derived columns in SSIS Derived Column Task in one attempt.as i have around 150 columns coming from Flat file. I had created the required Expression in Excel and now i want add those in derived column task but its allowing only 1 expression at a time.
Hi. We have to create an export from our system to be imported into another system. To get the data out we need to create some SQl but we're struggling a bit.
Hi! I have a general SQL CE v3.5 design question related to table/file layout. I have an system that has multiple tables that fall into categories of data access. The 3 categories of data access are:
1 is for configuration-related data. There is one application that will read/write to the data, and a second application that will read the data on startup.
1 is for high-performance temporal storage of data. The data objects are all the same type, but they are our own custom object and not just simple types.
1 is for logging where the data will be permanent - unless the configured size/recycling settings cause a resize or cleanup. There will be one application writing alot [potentially] of data depending on log settings, and another application searching/reading sections of data. When working with data and designing the layout, I like to approach things from a data-centric mindset, because this seems to result in a better performing system. That said, I am thinking about using 3 individual SDF files for the above data access scenarios - as opposed to a single SDF with multiple tables. I'm thinking this would provide better performance in SQL CE because the query engine will not have alot of different types of queries going against the same database file. For instance, the temporal storage is basically reading/writing/deleting various amounts of data. And, this is different from the logging, where the log can grow pretty large - definitely bigger than the default 128 MB. So, it seems logical to manage them separately.
I would greatly appreciate any suggestions from the SQL CE experts with regard to my approach. If there are any tips/tricks with respect to different data access scenarios - taking into account performance, type of data access, etc. - I would love to take a look at that.
This is kind of what I'm trying to do in my MS SQL 2000 query. ShouldI be able to reference s1.col1 inside the 2nd derived table?I'm getting 'Invalid column name col1' and it's coming from the 2ndderived table (I've commented out other refs to just it to check).Maybe I need to use a temp table instead.SELECT s1.col1,(SELECT * FROM(SELECT COUNT(zzz) AS SomeTotalFROM tab1WHERE s1.col1 = zzz)) AS RowCount) /* error here */FROM(SELECT col1 FROM table) AS s1Thank you!
Hi, In the SQL92 Specifications i read the foloowingf statement... "All base tables are updatable. Derived tables are either updatable or read-only. The operations of insert, update, and delete are permitted for updatable tables, subject to constraining Access Rules. The operations of insert, update, and delete are not allowed for read-only tables." But i am concentrating on the below line from the above written lines, "Derived tables are either updatable or read-only." I want to ask that is derived tables are updatable or not??? if yes then how,???i tried the following querry but its not working...
Very basic beginner XML question. Is it possible to have an attribute name repeated in a schema ? I received an XML and XSD file for which I'm getting the error "multiple base for derived type on dte_effective is not supported." "dte_effective" is repeated under several elements. Is there a way to resolve this error by adding something to the schema to indicate that the date is specific to each element ? Can't figure this one out. I've googled the error and found nothing to resolve this. XSD file sample is below... Thanks, J.
Hello.So the scenario is a little complicated.I am joining two tables.Table 1 is derived; it has one row; it has a column based from newid()Table 2 joins to table 1 and reuses the newid() value from table 1 in table 2's rowsBecause there is only one row in Table 1, the value of newid() REPEATS in Table 2The bug is that the NewId() value from Table1 is REGENERATED with every Table 2 record.I created a blog about this because it takes a code sample to demonstrate:http://jerrytech.blogspot.com/2008/04/sql-2005-tsql-bug-with-newid-in-derived.html
they all seem same to me. Is there any big difference among them.
Also, if I do have the tables avaiable, so now I don't think I have to create any of the temerory tables, since I can use the
WITh mystatement ( ) Select * from mystatmment
I think if I have to use any of the temperory tables , only time when I have to just create some tables to test some values on in it rather then using the real table in the database.
2) And not only that I use the CTE for that but for any sub query whereever apply, i would like to forget about the IN, Exit or = in the correlated queries but would use whereever I can use the "Joins"
Relative SQL newbie here......this is probably easy, but....Lets say I have a table (MainTable) that stores a list of input table names,a primary key (PKey), and a field called "Configured" for each one. Each ofthese input tables also contain a field called "Configured", which is set totrue or false in another process based on an OrderNumber. (So an order'sinputs are stored in several input tables, and the MainTable is a summarytable that shows which input tables have been configured for any givenOrderNumber).What I need to do is open each input table, and look for a record containinga specific OrderNumber and where Configured=true. If a record is found, Ineed to update the Configured field for that table in the MainTable, andthen move on to the next sub-table.The way I'm doing it now is with simple SQL and loops. Here is the basiccode (ASP):*****************************************OrderNumber = "562613" ' the current order that is being processed' reset all configured flagssql = "UPDATE MainTable SET Configured = 0"conn.execute sql, , &H00000080' get list of all tablenamessql = "SELECT InputTableName, PKey FROM MainTable WHERE InputTableName <>'---'"set rsTableNames = conn.execute(sql)while not rsTableNames.eof' test each input table for configured flagsql = "SELECT Configured FROM " & rsTableNames("InputTableName")& _" WHERE Configured = 1 AND OrderNumber = '" & OrderNumber &"'"set rs = conn.execute(sql)If Not rs.EOF Then' update the main tablesql = "UPDATE MainTable SET Configured = 1 WHERE PKey='" &rsTableNames("PrimaryKey") & "'"conn.execute sql, , &H00000080end ifset rs = nothingrsTableNames.movenextwend*****************************************There has to be a faster way.. I think.... maybe something that could bewritten as a stored procedure? I use a similar technique in a couple ofother places and it's a bit of a performance hit, especially as the numberof input tables grows.TIA!Calan
I am using derived tables to Page data on the SQL Server side.I used this link as my mentor for doing paging on the SQLServerhttp://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms979197.aspxI wanted to use USER PAGING, thus I used the following code:CREATE PROCEDURE UserPaging(@currentPage int = 1, @pageSize int =1000)ASDECLARE @Out int, @rowsToRetrieve int, @SQLSTRING nvarchar(1000)SET @rowsToRetrieve = (@pageSize * @currentPage)SET NOCOUNT ONSET @SQLSTRING = N'selectCustomerID,CompanyName,ContactName,ContactTitle from( SELECT TOP '+ CAST(@pageSize as varchar(10)) +'CustomerId,CompanyName,ContactName,ContactTitle from( SELECT TOP ' + CAST(@rowsToRetrieve as varchar(10)) +'CustomerID,CompanyName,ContactName,ContactTitle FROM( SELECT TOP ' + CAST(@rowsToRetrieve as varchar(10)) +'CustomerID,CompanyName,ContactName,ContactTitle FROM Customers as T1ORDER BY contactname) AS T2 ORDER BY contactname DESC ) AS T3)As T4 ORDER BY contactname ASC'EXEC(@SQLSTRING)RETURNGOWhen I use this. Assume that the Total records returned by the SQLquery is 1198.Thus when I am on Page1 the above Stored Proc (SP) willreturn the first 1000 records.This works absolutely fine.Now I am on Page2, now I need to retrieve only the remaining 198records.But if I use the above SP, it will return the last 1000records.So to tweak this I used the following logic to set the@pagesize variable:Declare @PageCount intselect @PageCount = @TotalRows/@PageSizeif @currentPage @PageCount SET @PageSize = @TotalRows%@PageSizeSince I am on Page2 the above logic will set the PageSize to 198 andnot 1000.But when I use this logic, it takes forever for the SP toreturn the 198 records in a resultset.However if the TotalRows were = 1800, and thus the PageSize=800 orgreater, this SP returns the resultset quickly enough.Thus to get over this problem I had to use the other logic i.e. usingApplication Paging (i.e. first storing the entire result set into aTemp table, then retrieving only the required records for the PAGE)Can anyone suggest what is wrong with my user paging logic?????TIA...
I did use query plans to find out more. ( Please see the thread BELOW)I have a question on this, if someone can help me with that it will begreat.In my SQL query that selects data from table, I have a where clausewhich states :where PermitID like @WorkTypeorder by WorkStart DESC@WorkType is a input parameter to the Stored proc and its value is'01%'When I use the above where clause, all the Sorts in the ESTIMATED QueryExecution plan show me a COST of 28%.However if I change the query manually to say:where PermitID like '01%'order by WorkStart DESCThe COST of the Sort (in ESTIMATED Query Execution plan) reduces to 2%and at the beginning of the PLAN, there is a Bookmark Lookup whichincludes the above where clause.Whereas with the FIRST example , the BookMark Lookup in the beginningdoesn't show that where condition.Can anyone help me better understand this anomaly?TIA=====================================I am using derived tables to Page data on the SQL Server side.I used this link as my mentor for doing paging on the SQLServerhttp://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms979197.aspxI wanted to use USER PAGING, thus I used the following code:CREATE PROCEDURE UserPaging(@currentPage int = 1, @pageSize int =1000)ASDECLARE @Out int, @rowsToRetrieve int, @SQLSTRING nvarchar(1000)SET @rowsToRetrieve = (@pageSize * @currentPage)SET NOCOUNT ONSET @SQLSTRING = N'selectCustomerID,CompanyName,ContactName,ContactTitle from( SELECT TOP '+ CAST(@pageSize as varchar(10)) +'CustomerId,CompanyName,ContactName,ContactTitle from( SELECT TOP ' + CAST(@rowsToRetrieve as varchar(10)) +'CustomerID,CompanyName,ContactName,ContactTitle FROM( SELECT TOP ' + CAST(@rowsToRetrieve as varchar(10)) +'CustomerID,CompanyName,ContactName,ContactTitle FROM Customers as T1ORDER BY contactname) AS T2 ORDER BY contactname DESC ) AS T3)As T4 ORDER BY contactname ASC'EXEC(@SQLSTRING)RETURNGOWhen I use this. Assume that the Total records returned by the SQLquery is 1198.Thus when I am on Page1 the above Stored Proc (SP) willreturn the first 1000 records.This works absolutely fine.Now I am on Page2, now I need to retrieve only the remaining 198records.But if I use the above SP, it will return the last 1000records.So to tweak this I used the following logic to set the@pagesize variable:Declare @PageCount intselect @PageCount = @TotalRows/@PageSizeif @currentPage @PageCount SET @PageSize = @TotalRows%@PageSizeSince I am on Page2 the above logic will set the PageSize to 198 andnot 1000.But when I use this logic, it takes forever for the SP toreturn the 198 records in a resultset.However if the TotalRows were = 1800, and thus the PageSize=800 orgreater, this SP returns the resultset quickly enough.Thus to get over this problem I had to use the other logic i.e. usingApplication Paging (i.e. first storing the entire result set into aTemp table, then retrieving only the required records for the PAGE)Can anyone suggest what is wrong with my user paging logic?????TIA...
The data I am pulling is correct I just cant figure out how to order by the last 8 numbers that is my NUMBER column. I tried adding FOR XML AUTO to my last line in my query: From AP_DETAIL_REG where AP_BATCH_ID = 1212 and NUMBER is not null order by NUMBER FOR XML AUTO) as Temp(DATA) where DATA is not null
but no change same error. Output: 1234567890000043321092513 00050020
Select DATA from( select '12345678'+ left( '0', 10-len(cast ( CONVERT(int,( INV_AMT *100)) as varchar))) + cast (CONVERT(int,(INV_AMT*100)) as varchar) + left('0',2-len(CAST (MONTH(DATE) as varchar(2))))+ CAST (MONTH(DATE) as varchar(2)) + left('0',2-len(CAST (day(CHECK_DATE) as varchar(2)))) + CAST (day(DATE) as varchar(2))+right(cast (year(DATE)
I want to compare values of two fields in same resultset. Like I have resultset whrre there are two fields Frequency and New_Frequency I want to compare this two like if
Frequency = New_Frequency then do some logic.
I tried with derived columun using Frequency == New_NewFrequency but it doesn't work.
I have create stored procedure that returns 2 resultsets. When I configure OLE DB Source to use this procedure I can not add second output for he source. I get following error:
TITLE: Microsoft Visual Studio ------------------------------
Error at Data Flow Task [OLE DB Source [1]]: An output cannot be added to the outputs collection.
I dragged two tables into the dataset designer. And I have a query with a resultset over both of the tables (joined).Is there ANY way I can have a strongly typed datatable out of the resultset?The automatically created dataset adapters won't allow me to create a tableadapter or datatable for the joined resultset but for one single table at a time only.Any solution to that? Theoretically it should be possible since I don't "lose" any type information with a join.. why can't I have a strongly typed datatable over the resultset?The join is not very sophisticated. In fact it couldn't be any more simple.(I'm refering to my previously posted question at http://forums.asp.net/t/1220481.aspx)
I'd need to generate multiple recordsets within a MS SQL stored procedure. The thing is these recordsets depend on each previous one (the first one obviously has parameters). How can I make this work? I can't create views with SPs. Thank you very, very much.
I have a requirement where in i have around 15 different flat files , filenames are fixed but folder path can be changed(i think i should use a variable for folder path). These 15 files data should go to their respective tables in the database.
Whether I need to create separate data flow task for each file or separate package? In addition to these, example : while importing product data into product table, if product ID already exists, we need to ignore it and upload only the new records.
I have just taken over the job of sorting out a rather poorly designed database. It looks like it was 'upsized' from an access database to the SQL server. The SQL server is the 2000 version.
Now I am trying to generate a report of what the students in the database are owing by referencing the Receipt table and then all the available payment methods and allocations. I was wondering if there was anyway to work out data being displayed twice (Let me demonstrate)
Note1: All the tables are linked by a key of ReceiptNo. From what I can see there is a table for every payment type and allocation but no link between the two other then the receipt number.
Using the query: SELECT T_Receipt.ReceiptNo, T_cheque.Amount AS Chq_Amount, T_credit.Amount AS Cre_Amount, StandingOrder.Amount AS Stn_Amount, T_BankTransfer.amount AS Bnk_Amount, T_cash.TotalAmount AS Cas_Amount, T_RentPayment.AmountPayed AS Ren_Paid, T_AdminPayment.AmountPaid AS Adm_Paid, T_InternetBilling.Total AS Int_Paid, T_Utilities.AmountPaid AS Util_Amount, T_InvoicePayment.amountPaid AS Inv_Paid, T_OtherPayments.paymentAmount AS Oth_Paid, T_parkingBill.paymentAmount AS Prk_Paid, T_TelephoneBills.TelephoneCredit AS Tel_Paid, T_DepositPayment.[Deposit payment] AS Dep_Amount, T_Receipt.cancelled AS Canceled, T_Receipt.RemittanceReceiptNo AS Rec_Ref, T_Receipt.Student FROM T_Receipt INNER JOIN T_DepositPayment ON T_Receipt.ReceiptNo = T_DepositPayment.receiptNo LEFT OUTER JOIN T_RentPayment ON T_Receipt.ReceiptNo = T_RentPayment.RentPaymentNo LEFT OUTER JOIN StandingOrder ON T_Receipt.ReceiptNo = StandingOrder.ReceiptNo LEFT OUTER JOIN T_TelephoneBills ON T_Receipt.ReceiptNo = T_TelephoneBills.ReceiptNo LEFT OUTER JOIN T_parkingBill ON T_Receipt.ReceiptNo = T_parkingBill.ReceiptNo LEFT OUTER JOIN T_OtherPayments ON T_Receipt.ReceiptNo = T_OtherPayments.ReceiptNo LEFT OUTER JOIN T_InvoicePayment ON T_Receipt.ReceiptNo = T_InvoicePayment.receiptNo LEFT OUTER JOIN T_cash ON T_Receipt.ReceiptNo = T_cash.ReceiptNo LEFT OUTER JOIN T_AdminPayment ON T_Receipt.ReceiptNo = T_AdminPayment.ReceiptNo LEFT OUTER JOIN T_BankTransfer ON T_Receipt.ReceiptNo = T_BankTransfer.receiptNo LEFT OUTER JOIN T_Utilities ON T_Receipt.ReceiptNo = T_Utilities.receiptNo LEFT OUTER JOIN T_credit ON T_Receipt.ReceiptNo = T_credit.ReceiptNo LEFT OUTER JOIN T_cheque ON T_Receipt.ReceiptNo = T_cheque.ReceiptNo LEFT OUTER JOIN T_InternetBilling ON T_Receipt.ReceiptNo = T_InternetBilling.ReceiptNo GROUP BY T_Receipt.Student, T_Receipt.ReceiptNo, T_cheque.Amount, T_credit.Amount, StandingOrder.Amount, T_BankTransfer.amount, T_cash.TotalAmount, T_AdminPayment.AmountPaid, T_InternetBilling.Total, T_Utilities.AmountPaid, T_InvoicePayment.amountPaid, T_OtherPayments.paymentAmount, T_parkingBill.paymentAmount, T_TelephoneBills.TelephoneCredit, T_Receipt.cancelled, T_Receipt.RemittanceReceiptNo, T_DepositPayment.[Deposit payment], T_RentPayment.AmountPayed, T_Receipt.Student HAVING (T_Receipt.Student LIKE N'06%')
Which gives a result of:
RecNo. 30429 Cheque 250 Deposit 250
30429 679.98 250
This is fine but when I do analysis on this it appears as though the student has paid two deposit payments. I was wondering with out querying each table independently from an application if there was a criteria to specify that I only get one deposit result. So as such say, give me all the payments but I only want one result from the other tables. I though about discrete but that wouldn't work here.
I have 7 source databases and one target database, all using the same structure. The structure is made of 10 tables, with foreign key constraints.
I need to merge the source databases into the target (which won't have any data before that process, but will already have the correct schema), and to keep the relationships between the records.
I know how to iterate over the source databases (with SMO foreach), but I'd like to know if someone can advise the best copy method for that context in SSIS ? (I don't want to keep the primary keys, but I need to keep the relationships...)
I have a couple of hundred flat files to import into database tables using SSIS.
The files can be divided into groups by the format they use. I understand that I could import each group of files that have a common format at the same time using a Foreach Loop Container.
However, the example for the Foreach Loop Container has multiple files all being imported into the same database table. In my case, each file needs to be imported into a different database table.
Is it possible to import each set of files with the same format into different tables in a simple loop? I can't see a way to make a Data Flow Destination item accept its table name dynamically, which seems to prevent me doing this.
I suppose I could make a different Data Flow Destination item for each file, in the Data Flow. Would that be a reasonable solution, or is there a simpler solution, or should I just resign myself to making a separate Data Flow for every single file?
Hello I am building a survey application. I have 8 questions. Textbox - Call reference Dropdownmenu - choose Support method Radio button lists - Customer satisfaction questions 1-5 Multiline textbox - other comments. I want to insert textbox, dropdown menu into a db table, then insert each question score into a score column with each question having an ID. I envisage to do this I will need an insert query for the textbox and dropdownlist and then an insert for each question based on ID and score. Please help me! Thanks Andrew
I need to be able to bulk insert a bunch of tables from their corresponding flat file. I have created an XML file (see below) which has the file name/table name pair at each node. I then created a ForEachLoop task and used the Node enumeration type and the following OuterXpathString: ReferenceFiles/File. At this point I get lost. How do I pass the 2 inside node values (file name and table name) to variables which I can then use as expressions for the bulk insert task inside the Foreach?
I used the data export wizard to export a single table to a single flat file (multiple wasn't allowed). I saved the package as a *.dtsx file which I'm attempting to edit to add the additional tables.
Creating additional sources is fairly easy copy of the first source and change to the table name.
I've tried copying the destination connection and changing to a new text file, but can't get past having to add each column manually to the new destination.
How can I duplicate the mapping that must be taking place in the wizard in the *.dtsx editing environment?
This seems like a simple / common task, but I've been unable to find a solution.