We have 10 developers. All 10 use ONE server to do development work (design, coding, testing ONLY!). We have a Developer Edition licence for EACH developer. Is this OK? We have 10GB plus in test data and do not want to replicate that to each desktop.
According to the Developer Edition EULA, I would say NO. It looks like you can only have one developer (and a few testers, I forget the number) per server. It says NOTHING about having more than one developer access the same server under this license. The Developer Edition EULA appears to be designed around installing a database on a desktop just for that developer, not installing a central database that all developers use.
I am a developer in need of setting up a SQL Server test environment for many users.
Can the Dev Edition be used as a back-end to handle this type of testing? Are my limited to one connection from my development machine?
As you can tell, <sarcastic tone>i am having a real fun time with this one</sarcastic tone>. Licensing terms are an area that i tried but sometimes cann't stay out of.
I have two question with respect to the developer edition licensing in SQL Server 2000 and 2005:
Question 1 I wanted to install a developer edition on a Development/Test Server. The server needs to be accessed by our development and Testing team of a team of 20 from their workstations. Is that possible?
Question 2 And if so what are the different licensing options that I can choose from considering that I don't want to install a developer edition of sql server on each workstation? The developer edition will be installed on the Dev/Test Server and the workstations will connect to the server using NT or Standard authentication.
Hello all. I'm giving serious thought on changing gears withing the IT world. For several years I have been a software developer who has been fortunate enough to have been involved in the needed databases. From just sketching out tables for the DBA to doing the database from the ground up and maintaining it during production. Along the way I've known that I didn't do as quality of a job as a knowledgeable DBA would do but given the situations I made do just fine.
I am considering switching gears to the database side only, coding as secondary. Since I am basically familier with most aspects of SQL Server in a general way, I am looking to take that knowledge and become a "Professional". What I am looking for is a few books to help out. Maybe a "Become a DBA for Software Developers" or something. I know that mining these and other forums are very valuble but I'd like some other training materials as well.
Have I been clear enough on what I am looking for? I don't quite feel like I have.
Basically, what would you recommend for a good software developer who is looking on switching to becoming a good database person?
I'd like to stay in SQL Server for now, since that is what they use here and it would give me an opportunity to practice.
Also, do you see value in the studying process for certifications in this area?
I can't tell if the SQL Developer install upgraded the service, but left the SqlExpress version information, or if I'm still really only using SqlExpress.
Also, my intended target is SQL Enterprise, so if I am using SQL Express am I asking for trouble when I go to move the database over? Are the database formats compatible?
I've poked around trying to search for this answer for a while and haven't turned anything up. Maybe I'm searching on the wrong terms...
There are conflicting postings everywhere about this. I built a small site using VWD and SQL Server Express, but need to convert to Sql Server 2005 Developer because the DB will exceed 4Gb. Tried to install and could not connect or use from VWD. Tried to uninstall, got into large mess with the byzantine uninstall process, and have now started with a clean machine.
I installed SQL Server 2005 Developer first, then installed VWD Express 2008 without installing SQL Server Express. VWD won't let me connect to an existing database, won't let me add a new database and doesn't even show the Database Tools option under the Tools menu.
Is there someone with specific knowledge that can provide any enlightenment? Would be much appreciated.
Can someone here confirm or deny that Visual Web Developer 2005 Express Edition doesn't work with SQL Server Developer Edition 2005?
I was about to order SQL Server Developer Edition 2005 on Amazon, to use with Visual Web Developer 2005 Express, when I read a user comment that the two are incompatible with each other. Does anyone know for sure if that is true?
What I'm wanting to do is develop an ASP.NET web application on a web host using a SQL Server database. I use VS2003 and SQL Server Enterprise 2000 at work, but I'd like to learn the 2005 editions for this side project. I don't own any of the developer tools/IDEs personally, so I'm trying to find the most affordable way to do this for my home business.
I'm trying to register a developer's 2000 pc from my 2005 pc.
i'm not sure this is even something possible from Dev Edition to Dev Edition- I can register a 2000 server just fine.
I can ping him. Both our systems have remote access 'on'. His server is (local), i've tried connecting to it by just entering his machine name and by using just the ip address. The error I get is "timeout expired. The timeout elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is not responding."
Am I just not registering this properly? I entered just the ip address in the 'server' box. I am connecting as sa with the pw he gave me. When i connect to my server, I use the ip addressinstance. However, I am not sure what to use for the instance when all I see when I look at his machine is (local).
Is there a way to get Licensing information(product key) off an installed version of SQL Server 2005? Most Microsoft Software has the product key in the about dialog box, but SQL Server doesn't have this anywhere. Thanks,
I'm going crazy trying to find out the license deal for SQL Server 2000 Developer Edition. It seems that here (in the UK) the Developer edition exists and you can buy it but, Micrisoft (UK) and various resellers etc don't know the licensing deal!!!
Now, i've read a snippet somewhere about the developer edition that for a fixed price of around $499 you get a server license limited to 8 connections and you don't have to buy any CALs! However my reseller thinks that you still have to buy CALs up to maximum of 8? Well, i don't think so!!
We are about to deploy an application that uses SQL Server 7.0. Enterprise edition running on a dual processor machine. We expect a maximum concurrent usage of about 500 users, normally about 150/200. Could anyone advise me what the cheapest license arrangement would be, I've had conflicting views from Microsoft and two third party software suppliers? We intend to use the machine in future for other applications but as yet have very little idea of usage. Joe
Can any one please clear my confusion. when we install 2000 it always give option ofr licence (processor or per seat) but i installed 2005 couple of times but can' see any option in whole installation about type of licenscing. any one have any idea where and how to choose type of licence for SQL Server 2005.
Web Server = Windows 2003 Server Standard Edition running IIS
All the website hosted on this server will be available to the public.
Question 1.How do i licenses Windows 2003 Server Standard Edition? Question 2.Do i need a CAL for every single person browsing to any of the websites hosted on the above server. As far as i know you can not get a PER CPU license for Windows 2003 Server, is this true. Question 3. Where would a CAL be required. Question 4. How about remote desktop to the above server? that requires a CAL.
I know that I can have up to 2 GB RAM for the Standard Edition of SQLServer, but if I had two instances, can I have 2 GB per instance, say for 2instances which would equal 4 GB, or is it 2 GB for that installation of SQLServer and all of it's instances?Thanks.
Hello We have a sql server 2005 Enterprise Edition installed on one of our servers where we gor processor license. The question is can i install a second instance of Sql Server 2000 with out buying any extra licenses or should we buy licenses for this second instance seperately.
Obviously I'm missing something here (Like a brain??), but from the documentation I'm somewhat confused as to the licensing aspect of the everywhere edition.
Scenario: I have a client (small business for example) and I'm updeating their MS Access application, currently having the front and back ends seperate. May I substitute SQL Everywhere edition in place of the data back-end without further licensing, or will a CAL be required?
The company I work for has the latest MSDN subscription which has the SQL 2005 Standard edtion, as well as others, and I am trying to figure out what the license is for the SQL. I.E. Processor or what. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
I need to know if I have to buy an extra license for my subscriber server in the following two scenarios. I have checked similar threads in the forum but could not find an exact answer.
Scenario 1 :
Server A : Publisher - SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition.
Server B : Subscriber - SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition
Server B has ONLY the replica of one or more DBs of Server A
I have already purchased SQL Server processor license for Server A
Replication Type : Transaction Replication
Scenario 2 :
Server A : Publisher - SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition.
Server B : Subscriber - SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition
Server B has the replica of one or more DBs of Server A plus one or more operational (mostly reporting) DBs
I have already purchased SQL Server processor license for Server A
Hi...First, I am not sure whether I put this post correctly or not. My issue is I developed one simple web application with using ASP.Net 2.0, VB 2005 and SQL express. I wonder that if i install it to my customer's pc, do they need to pay for SQL express's licensing since it is free now.. Thanks in advance.Regards, Anson
The MSDE licence says that it can be used for up to 5 concurrent users. My app is an ASP.NET app, so won't I just be using one user - the ASP.NET account? I'm wondering whether we can get away with just buying a new server and sticking MSDE on it rather than shelling out for another £5000 SQL server licence...
I expected to find loads of posts regarding licensing but surprising not.
I have SQL Server Developer Edition, which I believe gives me the right to build and distribute applications which use MSDE (http://www.microsoft.com/sql/msde/howtobuy/msdeuse.asp).
Is there any requirement for the end user to purchase any microsoft product or license?
Quick licensing question...If I am developing an asp.net application using sql server 2005...what is the licensing situation? Do I need just the one CAL for the server with IIS that is hosting the application? or is it one CAL per database connection? One CAL for every person using my application? I'm not sure and I want to make sure that I comply with the licensing for my application. Thanks in advance!Phil
Hello all, I did explore the archives on this one, but could'nt find anything that closely matched my issue. I'm running SQL 7.0 Server (Desktop version) on my laptop and when I try to use DTS to transfer data from a SQL Server 7.0 running on NT Server 4.0 in the SAME NT domain. The error I get says that the licensing arrangement I have does not permit me to use DTS.
Does SQL 2000 standard edition support replication if it would be configured as a subscriber. Is SQL 2000 Enterprise Edition required for a Publisher and Distributor or can you get away with standard edition. In a web site environment how many CALs are needed when users access the database via webservers and middleware.
I've got 5 user licensing with MS SQL Server 7. I would like to know does the licensing refer to the connection with SQL Server. I've developed an application using VB which have multiple connection (more then 5) with SQL Server. Will there be any problem?
I have a laptop that currently runs Windows 98. I have loaded SQL Server 7.0 Desktop Edition onto this computer. I am getting a DTS licensing error when I attempt to transform data using DTS between remote SQL Servers. The only workaround I have found is to create a DTS package and perform the transformations using transfer manager. This works for me now, but I am wondering how I might go about solving this license problem. It is my belief that a demo version of SQL server 7.0 might have existed on this machine long before I loaded my installation. If this is the case, how can I straighten out the registry to fix my licensing problem?
If SQL Server 2000 is loaded onto a 8 processor machine, can I legitimately load Standard Edition, which will only use 4 of the 8 processors, or as some interpretations of the license suggest, must I purchase Enterprise Edition (i.e. you are not permitted to load SQL Server on a machine which has more processors than the Product is capable of using) ?.
I know the "reasonable" answer, but what is the legal position ?
I have an SMS 2.0 site set up on one server and SQL 7.0 installed on another server. I have 288 users and have 288 SMS client license and one SMS server license. My question is do I need to have client access licenses for my 288 users for SQL or is the SQL 7.0 licenses included in the SMS package as long as I only use SQL for SMS?
Also does anyone know if SQL 7.0 ask for the number of license that I have during the installation process?
I would appreciate any input anyone may have on this.
I know that PerSeat is each individual computer that accesses SQL Server and PerServer is the number of concurrent connections to the server. Is Client Access Licenses the same as PerSeat?
