Differant Language OS And Data Storage In SQL Server
Oct 11, 2001
Dear Friends,
I am using SQL server 7 with ASP. I have two working environment means one is korean and second it english.
- one Korean OS server have SQL server 7.0 and it is my database server
- second Korean OS server is only webserver
- English OS is win2k and it is only Web server.
1) When i used both Korean server as my webserver + database server then there is no problem to add Korean Data to SQL server On korean OS.
2) But when I try to user English OS server as my webserver and Korean Os server as my database server then I am not able to store Korean Data in Database server insted of it stored some mis/junk/acssi characters in database.
-- I allready try with Korean version of MDAC of English os
-- I also try with OEM feature in SQL server client network utility
-- When I am use CODEPAGE in my .ASP page then data storage work fine .. but at the time of getting it back there is problem.
If u need any more information about problem then let me know.
So please help me in this regards.
Thanx in advance
Anis Vora
Partner
Global SoftWeb Solutions
www.globalsoftweb.com
I have ran into a problem making a database where i have two versions of a book , one in russian and the other in English. The english part worked but when i input the data for Russian it gets replaced each time with question marks. Is there something i have to enable for the SQL database for it to be able to store Russian Text, or is it a DataType i have to set???
I am a Windows developer for the IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Server (TSMS) product. Our product installation is built with InstallShield and uses the Windows Installer.
On a new installation of Windows 2003 x64 Storage Server R2, at a customer's site, the TSMS product fails to install. The install of the OS has version 3.01.400.3959 of the Windows Installer and I see no newer version that installs.
Part of our product is 32 bit (console) and another part is x64 (server). When installing I can see that the install's default is being redirected/reset to C:Program Files (x86)TivoliTSM after it is explicitly set by a custom action to ..Program Files.. . I further observe that our custom actions to write 64 bit registry entries are being refused.
REGSAM samMask = KEY_ALL_ACCESS; if ( regIsWow64Process () ) samMask = samMask | KEY_WOW64_64KEY; lStatus = RegCreateKeyEx( hLocalConnectKeyRoot, szSubkey, 0L, NULL, REG_OPTION_NON_VOLATILE, samMask, NULL, hKey, &dw ) ; The above fails to create the key.
We have tried four versions of our TSMS spanning many changes but the install acts the same. This does not happen on any other Windows OS we test on but we do not test on Windows 2003 Storage Server R2 being that it is an OEM product. We did test on Windows server 2003 R2 x64 and do not see this problem.
Do you have any suggestions on how to tackle this problem? I have full installation traces but can only see that the registry work is being refused. I can't see why.
How to implement distinct storage tiers on SQL Remote BLOB Storage (RBS)?
I want to use this SQL Feature to move files(images, videos, pdf files) from a database to a distinct database dedicated to RBS. Then I want to have several storage tiers, where objects will be saved and moved according access frequency. Old data will be arquived in cheap storage, but it must be always accessible if needed.
Description: - 1st and main tier: new and frequently accessed objects stored in high performance storage; - 2nd tier: automatically move older or less accessed objects to an inexpensive and different storage tier; - in all cases, all objects must be accessible to all users, but accessing to archived objects(2nd tier) will be much slower;
i need to store russian data in sql server db but i found the russain data appeared as odd character in the table, can sql server support it or is there other solution for it? thanks!
i want to know how many data can storage into sql server compact edition. I've got a db into a pocket pc that has a table with about 2000 records inside; are they too records?
During work with creating, updating or deleting objects in a database, we use explicit name of the objects, for example DROP PROCEDURE myProc. By what the method can I avoid using the explicit name and get something like this: DROP PROCEDURE @myProc or DROP PROCEDURE id_myProc?
hi all, I have a field which name is Information and it type is Varchar (8000),but some time data access than 8000 character, my client told me,make this field to store Unlimited data. So how can i achive this task, i m using VS 2003 (ASP.NET with VB.NET) with SQL 2000. Thanks Shally
Hi All,As per BOL, XML data type can store up 2 GB of data.My question is when a row is inserted in a table, for its xml column,2GB of space will be resered.In other words, how xml is internally stored. Is storage allocation issimilar to varchar(max) data type?Thanks in advance for everything.
I am planning on doing database mirroring using two (2) servers for each instance and a SAN to store the data and log files for both the primary server and mirrored server. How do I arrange the SAN 4 Physical Drives? My options are: · 2 Raid 1 Mirrors giving 250 GB to each SQL engine This though has both the transaction logs and data on the same physical drive even if we split it up further into logical drives · A Raid 10 - The transaction logs and data can be on separate drives · A Raid 5 using the 4 Drives. (How SQL will see these drives Im not sure when its 2 SQL engines) · Or I could get a 5th drive and have a mirror set for transaction logs and a RAID 5 configured for the data.
I have a table in sql server 2000 which has over 94000 records. I have to delete a record from table ,which record having a language other than english . I need to clean the table by removing all the data which are in other language . My main table has 12 fields .
Hello, So, here's my dumb question; if I wanted to store some *.gif images in some database (SQL2K possibly 2K5) field and wanted to pull the information from that to display on the web form, am I actually storing the image in the database or am I storing the location of the image in the database?I ask this because I was under the impression that the location to the image file is what was being stored but another person was saying that it was the actual image. I guess I'm confused... Thanks in advance....
User-B Custom fields: Blood type <char 3> Date of birth <date> Referred by <varchar 50>
Different users can have different custom fields in their address book. As you can see, while the standard fields for each user can be
stored in a single table. However, I have several methods by which I can store the CUSTOM fields.
------------------------------------------------ Method 1: Create 2 separate tables called CustomField and CustomValue:
CustomField has fields: FieldID <int> FieldName <varchar 25> UserID <int>
CustomValue has fields: ValueID <int> Value <varchar 50> FieldID <int>
------------------------------------------------ Method 2: Create a separate Field and multiple Value tables for each data type: CustomField, CustomCharValue, CustomIntValue, CustomMoneyValue, etc...
CustomField has fields: FieldID <int> FieldName <varchar 25> FieldType <smallint> (determines which TABLE, below, contains the data) UserID <int>
I'm thinking that while Method 1 will be easier to implement, Method 2 may offer me better performance if coded correctly. I'm going
to assume that I'll have at least 1-5 million records to work with over the course of my first year and I will need the ability to sort
records based on values in the custom fields as well.
My first question is: Which method should I be considering and is there an alternative or hybrid that I should be considering?
My second question is: What statements should I use in my stored procedure that will enable me to retrieve a list of USERID, CustomFieldIDs and their values as one resulting table that I can query at will and with solid performance?
I trying to fully understand when to use different data types in sql server.I want to know what Microdoft means when they say"Varchar is the actual length of the data entered plus 2 bytes".example e.g. what would the storage of varchar (50) be?
Don't know if this is the right forum to be asking this, but I'll give it a try...
I'm relativelly a beginner in SQL Server and T-SQL in general. The problem I'm trying to solve is the following:
The big picture is that I have data coming from different data sources which I need to store on a database for later reference. Each data source might have a different set of measurements. For example, data source 1 might log Pressure and Humidity while data source 2 logs Pressure and Temperature. Once the data is present on the DB, the users can go ahead and retrieve data for a given [datasource/measurement/time interval] to generate reports or charts.
My implementation so far consists of two tables: series_info and series_data. series_info holds general information for a given series of measurements for a given data source (Pressure for data source 1, Pressure for data source 2, Humidity for data source 1 and Temperature for data source 2, in our example). Each series has a bigint index as primary key.
The table series_data contains all data relative to the series from series_info. Each piece of data has a bigint as a primary key, an associate time (which is always crescent) and a foreign key to the series it represents (in series_info).
Alright, everything is cool so far. However, whenever a user wants to retrieve data for given [data source/measurement/time interval], this takes very long, since all data is interposed in series_data and for every search it's necessary to find where the desired data actually lies.
One obvious solution for this would be to dynamically create a new table to hold the data for each series, but that would just make my database disorganized, since there would be thousands and thousands of tables.
Another thing that comes to my mind is to create a table with information of where lies the data for a given [data source / measurement] for given dates. So when the user requested data for a given [data source/measurement] between, say, january and february, we would first look at this intermediate table and find out that the data lies between indexes 1000 and 2000 on the series_data table, so the next SELECT command to series_data would already contain a restriction like WHERE index>=1000 and index<=2000. This should probably improve the speed of retrieval.
What do you guys (or girls) think? Maybe there's simply a classical solution for such a case.
Hello, I am designing a program for work with SQL Server express 2005. But I don't know what is the data storage limit in this version of SQL Server. What i want is storing about 30000 records in a table of the database. Hasn't SQL Server express 2005 any problem or restrictions for storing the data? Please advice in this regards, Thank you, Mona
User-B Custom fields: Blood type <char 3> Date of birth <date> Referred by <varchar 50>
Different users can have different custom fields in their address book. As you can see, while the standard fields for each user can be
stored in a single table. However, I have several methods by which I can store the CUSTOM fields.
------------------------------------------------ Method 1: Create 2 separate tables called CustomField and CustomValue:
CustomField has fields: FieldID <int> FieldName <varchar 25> UserID <int>
CustomValue has fields: ValueID <int> Value <varchar 50> FieldID <int>
------------------------------------------------ Method 2: Create a separate Field and multiple Value tables for each data type: CustomField, CustomCharValue, CustomIntValue, CustomMoneyValue, etc...
CustomField has fields: FieldID <int> FieldName <varchar 25> FieldType <smallint> (determines which TABLE, below, contains the data) UserID <int>
I'm thinking that while Method 1 will be easier to implement, Method 2 may offer me better performance if coded correctly. I'm going
to assume that I'll have at least 1-5 million records to work with over the course of my first year and I will need the ability to sort
records based on values in the custom fields as well.
My first question is: Which method should I be considering and is there an alternative or hybrid that I should be considering?
My second question is: What statements should I use in my stored procedure that will enable me to retrieve a list of USERID, CustomFieldIDs and their values as one resulting table that I can query at will and with solid performance?
can anyone help me to solve this problem i have created a ssis package to load the data from excel file to the table, but we are getting the data in different language ie in french,english and in china after loading the data when we view the data it is showing as junk characters for chinese data but we are able to see other language data ie french and english. so please tell me how to solve that reply to my mail id(sandeep_shetty@mindtree.com)
Ok so facebook groups have 100,000's of members. Members can be part of an unlimited number of groups, and a group can have an unlimited number of members.
Comma Deliniated String seems absurd. Many-2-Many Database relationship seems like it won't scale well t the 10's of thousands and 100's of thousands of members (especially if you have 1000-5000 groups). A table for each group would work but thats a bit over the top in my opinion. XML file doesn't seem to be any better than the above options.
I am no database guru, but I can't figure out a scalable method of doing this, be it with or without a database. I need something that can support 10 groups that have 20 members each OR 1000 groups with 100,000 members each.
Any help, suggestions, or kicked in the right direction would be most appreciated.
I am using sql server 2008 r2 on my end. I have created a database named testDB. I have a lot of tables with some log tables in this. some tables have contain lack of records in log table.
So my purpose is that I want to fix the table size of those tables(log tables) and want to move records in other database table placed on another location. So my database has no problem.
is there any way to make such above steps which I want for my database?
Is there already built any such functionality in sql server?
Just curiosity ... never pick up this since beginning. Our box is setted the language to English (United States) while the local machine setted as English (Australia) which I thought it's corresponding to locale machine not sql box.
Will this language setting effecting date issue stuff (DD-MM-YYYY)? Can someone clarify on this?
This thing brought up my attention cause we've just ran a trace and there is a warning which is:
User Error Message - Changed language setting to us_english.
In MS site, There is a option to download MSDE 2000 Rel A for German. But i could not find SQL Server 2005 EE for German. There is only one download in MS site. Could you please tell me where can i download German version of SQL Server 2005 EE.
I'm in the situation where we are suffering of poor performance on our SAN storage (VPlex) but it is mainly due to the quantity of data of different types which are on it (other applications, other I/O profile, bad storage usage...). As we plan to dedicate an ESX for SQL Server, we decide to have a new storage type. So we will go with NETAPP Clustered Data ONTAP on NAS technology.
Storage team want to enable only NFS protocol, so I'm wondering how SQL Server will handle that ? I read that NFS wasn't optimize for SQL Server and that block level (SAN) should be preferred.
I need to bulk insert very large amount of data into several MSSQLtables.The first Data model definition used identities to mantain relationshipbetween those tables but we found that natural keys (compound) arebetter forbulk insert (there is no need to obtain the identity first)My question is, changing the identities to natural keys (in some tablesinorder of 4, 5 attributes) will enlarge my database storage?I think MSSQL implements relationships with pointers (or hashcodes), sothestorage size will be similar, right?Regards,
i need to know where the database table stored in, where to find the data table without distrubing the sql server editor.whtr it is possible to get it from "C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQLData" or some where else.
hi all, i need to know how to enable my database that is stored on SQLServer 2005 to be able to store German characters, because as you know that when it finds a unique character that is not supported by the Collation language it puts instead a "?" character. so i need to know the correct Collation item that is equivelant to the German language or if there is any extra download or package i should get to make it work. Thank you very much.
Hi, This is chirag patel. we are going to develop web application which can disply data (Search Results) in different language. if user selected country Japan, then search results should be in Japanese. if user selected country Chian, then search results should be in Chinese. now i want to store all these read only data in Database. how and where i can store it? do i need to have different Databases? or with single database also i can achive? I means what is advisable approach to achieve this?
if Single Database for all countries then how i can store same data in different languages in single table?
please guide me if anyone know how to achive such kind of scenario in SQL Server?
