Difference Between Destination Adapter And Bcp In Sql Server 2005

Aug 24, 2007



Hi,

Will someone please tell me what is the difference between Destination adapter and bcp in Sql server 2005 ?

Thanks and Regards
Altaf Nizamuddin

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Sql Server Destination Adapter Error

Feb 7, 2007

Hi,

I have conditional split on a boolean variable, when the value is true, case1 output goes to Oledb Destination, defaukt Output goes to Sql Server Destination.

When I run the package with value "true" the package runs, but when i run the package with bool value "false", the data is inserted through oledb but Sql Server destination fails.

Can any one tell me Why.

[SQL Server Destination [292]] Error: An OLE DB error has occurred. Error code: 0x80040E14. An OLE DB record is available. Source: "Microsoft SQL Native Client" Hresult: 0x80040E14 Description: "Cannot fetch a row from OLE DB provider "BULK" for linked server "(null)".". An OLE DB record is available. Source: "Microsoft SQL Native Client" Hresult: 0x80040E14 Description: "The OLE DB provider "BULK" for linked server "(null)" reported an error. The provider did not give any information about the error.". An OLE DB record is available. Source: "Microsoft SQL Native Client" Hresult: 0x80040E14 Description: "Reading from DTS buffer timed out.".



I don't have any linked server.

thanks

Dharmbir

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL Server Destination Adapter + Indexed Views

Apr 22, 2007

Hi,
I'm getting some unexpected behaviour from my SSIS packages when targeting tables that are being referenced by Indexed Views. There's two separate issues:

1. When writing into a pair of tables with a SuperType / SubType relationship concurrently with a pair of SS destinations I'm getting deadlocks between the two. Removing the index on the view that references both of these fixes the problem.

2. Much odder, I'm getting some extremely long waits (10 times longer than the whole package should take to run!) from an SS Destination adapter even when there's no data in the flow for it to bulk insert. Again, removing the indexed views that reference the destination table fixes the problem.

The views aren't mine, and (apparently) are required by the reporting app (BO), so removing them isn't really an option. I realise that there's quite a lot of overhead to maintaining indexed views, but unfortunately, the project is on a very tight timeline, so I can't look into it in as much detail as I'd like.
I was wondering if anyone's experienced any similar issues, or would have any ideas as to where to start investigating?

Thanks a lot


Mark

View 2 Replies View Related

Using SQL Server Destination Adapter With SQL 2000 Database

Oct 14, 2007

It€™s always said that using the SQL Server Destination adapter is much faster when loading data to a SQL Server database. My question is, if I have a SQL 2000 database, can I still use the SQL Server Destination adapter, or is it only for SQL 2005 db? Is OLE DB Destination adapter my best bet? My data files(flat files), SSIS package and destination SQL 2000 db are all in the same physical server.

View 1 Replies View Related

Custom Destination Adapter

Jan 31, 2006

Hi All,



I have built a custom flat file destination adapter but it appears that the code is not working. When I debug the process I notice that the ProcessInput section is called multiple times. The first time it looks like everything is working, then it call it again and there is no inpout from the DTSInput90.

Why would it do this?

Thanks

Mike

View 4 Replies View Related

Destination Adapter In Store Procedure

Oct 22, 2007



Hi,

Will someone please tell me how to use
"Destination adapter in store procedure" .............

I'm using Sql server 2005, instead of using BCP i have to use
"Sql server destination adapter" in my store procedure,
Is it possible to implement destination adapter in store procs,
if it is yes please let me know how



Thanks and Regards
Altaf Hussain Nizamuddin

View 2 Replies View Related

Destination Adapter In Store Procedure

Oct 22, 2007

Hi,

Will someone please tell me how to use
"Destination adapter in store procedure" .............

I'm using Sql server 2005, instead of using BCP i have to use
"Sql server destination adapter" in my store procedure,
Is it possible to implement destination adapter in store procs,
if it is yes please let me know how



Thanks and Regards
Altaf Hussain Nizamuddin

View 4 Replies View Related

The Trash Destination Adapter - Really Needed?

May 23, 2006

Quick question...

I have a conditional split transform in a dataflow...

One of the outputs of the conditional split will take records that are just not needed...



Do I have to send that output into the Trash Destination adapter? Or can I just let those records hang?

Will there be a memory leak if I don't use a trash adapter?



I'm just thinking about if I move the package I'd have to go reinstalling the trash adapter every time...



Thanks

View 10 Replies View Related

SSIS Package Destination Adapter

Jun 6, 2006

I would Like to know whether anyone tried to SSIS from SQL to AS400.

I am getting Exception when I set destination adapter ( for As400).

Whats the acceptable value .

View 1 Replies View Related

Destination Adapter In Store Procedure

Oct 22, 2007



Hi,

Will someone please tell me how to use
"Destination adapter in store procedure" .............

I'm using Sql server 2005, instead of using BCP i have to use
"Sql server destination adapter" in my store procedure,
Is it possible to implement destination adapter in store procs,
if it is yes please let me know how



Thanks and Regards
Altaf Hussain Nizamuddin

View 3 Replies View Related

Is The OLE DB Destination Adapter Limited To 50 Character Fields

Mar 6, 2007

I didn't want to deal with any truncation issues so I edited the SQL created by the Import Wizard. I made the fields VARCHAR instead of NVARCHAR and changed the size from the default 50 to 250.

Now I have a triangle warning on the OLE DB Destination control. So I am wondering, is it limited to only handling 50 characters?

IanO

View 2 Replies View Related

Developing A Custom Task Using OLE DB Destination Adapter

Jul 25, 2007

I am writing a custom task to import data from delimited files into SQL tables. I use the standard Flat File Source adapter, a custom transformation to add a URN column and a filename column to the data and the standard OLEDB Destination Adapter.



Most of my test data files work fine except for ones with a lot of columns (around 350 columns). I get an error when I call the ReinitializeMetaData() method for the destination adapter.



Q1) Is there a restriction on the number of columns (or data row size) that can be imported into an OLEDB Destination Adapter?

Q2) The reason I use this adapter rather than the SQL Server Destination Adapter is that I need to set the destination table name using a variable. I don't believe I can do this with the SQL Server Destination Adapter. Is this the case?

Q3) Anyone know of a better/alternative way of acheiving the above? One way I have thought of is to create a custom destination adapter using the SQL Server Destination adapter as the base but I'm not sure whether this is a) possible and b) worth the hassle.



Hope someone can help...



Cheers

Nick

View 2 Replies View Related

What Exactly Is The Difference Between The Different Destination Connectors?

Oct 11, 2007

So far I have seen the OLE DB Destination connection which I can choose a Table or view OR Table or view - fast load. I know the Table or view - fast load has the extra options but what is the real difference between them? Performance? Also I used the SQL Destination connector. It looks close to the Table or view - fast load except it also can control the firing of triggers, but what is the real difference here between it and the other two data access types?

I want to know so I can document this for all of our developers and to utilize the correct one to use for the job use.

View 1 Replies View Related

Difference Between Sql Server 2005 And 2008

Feb 25, 2008



Hi,

do any body know the article that can give me berif idea about the difference between sql server 2005 and 2008, acutally i want to move over to 2008. but if the difference is not that much then i m might think about that.


Thanks and looking forward.

View 1 Replies View Related

What Is The Difference Between SQL Server 2005 Installed With .NET And A Standalone One

Aug 19, 2006

Please could anyone tell me what are the real differences between SQL Server 2005 bundled along with Visual Studio.NET and a standalone one.

Thanks in advance.

View 3 Replies View Related

Difference Between SQL Server 2005 And SQL Server 2008 SSRS(Sql Server Report)

Apr 15, 2008

Hi all,

Please tell me about difference between SQL Server 2005 and SQL Server 2008 SSRS(Sql Server report)
Why to upgrade for Sql Server 2008

Thanks,
Ashok

View 3 Replies View Related

What Are The Difference Between SQL Server 2000 And SQL Server 2005 Express Edition

Mar 3, 2006

What are the difference between SQL Server 2000 and SQL Server 2005 Express Edition.?

Or where i can find the list of differences. ?

Can SQL Server 2000 and SQL Server 2005 Express Edition can be used interchangeably for basic database operations?

Hope to get some response soon.

Regards

Sanjeev

View 2 Replies View Related

Difference Between MS Sql Server Management Studio And MS Sql Server 2005 Express?

May 30, 2008

What is the difference between MS SQL Server Management Studio Express and MS SQL Server 2005 Express Edition? i download SQLEXPR.EXE, do i also need to download the other?

thank you.

View 3 Replies View Related

Find Difference In Month And Year In Sql Server 2005

Jun 17, 2008

--find day,month,year
--for day select datediff(d,'01 may 2008',getdate())
 -- --for month select datediff(m,'01 jun 2006',getdate())
-- --for year select datediff(year,'01 jun 2006',getdate())
above working fine but suppose difference is 1 year 4 month and 2 month 15 days then It's giving 1 year and 2 month respectively.
but I want completely so I can use this in case of expired user in my project.
User can be expired in 1 month,3 month and 1 year. So I'm not able to recognize.
 thanks

View 3 Replies View Related

Query Performance Difference Between Sql Server 2005 And 2000

Aug 1, 2007

Hi,

I'm having an issue with a query I'm running on Sql Server 2005. It's a semi-complex query involving an in-line table function and several left outer joins which are joined on to the results of the function call. Two of the left outer joins are then qualified in a where clause of the form where table.Col is not null; the idea is that the final result set contains data that has no match in those two tables.

The problem revolves around a where clause in the function and the last left outer join (ie, one of the ones qualified with where not null). When I alter the where clause of the function to further restrict the result set the function returns, the query times shoots up from 1 second to roughly 2-3 minutes. Note that the time the function takes to complete is not affected. The difference in time is purely down to what the query does with the results the function provides. Also note that the change to the where clause provides a subset of the original data; it does not add any more data (it actually restricts the original resultset by roughly 1000 rows).

I can bring the query speed back down again by removing the last left outer join - this join takes one of the columns from the function, and joins it to a small table - 924 rows. So it appears that this particular join is the cause of the issue, but only when using the resultset generated from the modified function query.

Now, as the thread title alludes, Sql Server 2000 and 2005 handle this differently, or appear to. When I execute this same query on a Sql 2000 machine, there's no apparent time differences, and the data that is returned is as expected. Does anyone have any suggestions as to what might be causing this and how I can fix it? I could simply return the larger resultset and use managed code to filter out the rows I don't want; however, I would like to get to the bottom of this, especially if it's going to effect future queries.

Cheers,

Chris

View 4 Replies View Related

Copying Table Data From SQL Server 2005 To SQL Server 2000 - Very Slow When Using OLEDB Source And Destination Sources?

May 8, 2006

An SSIS package to transfer data from a DB instance on SQL Server 2005 to SQL Server 2000 is extremely slow. The package uses an OLEDB Source to OLEDB Destination for data transfer which is basically one table from sql server 2005 to sql server 2000. The job takes 5 minutes to transfer about 400 rows at night when there is very little activity on the server. During the day the job almost always times out.

On SQL Server 200 instances the job ran in minutes in the old 2000 package.

Is there an alternative to this. Tranfer Objects task does not work as there is apparently a defect according to Microsoft. Please let me know if there is any other option other than using a Execute 2000 package task or using an ActiveX Script to read records from one source and to insert them into the destination source, which I am not certain how long it might take and how viable will that be?

Any inputs will be much appreciated.

Thanks,

MShah

View 5 Replies View Related

Whats The Major Difference Between Sql Server 2005 Standard And Developer Edition?

Feb 25, 2008

Hi,
  I have Sql server 2005 Standard edition on my system and was wondering whats the difference between Standard edition and developer edition which one is better..most of the things that i do on sql server is
 write sprocs, create table etc...
any ideas will be appreciated..
regards
Karen

View 13 Replies View Related

Difference Between SQL Server 2005 And SQL Server 2008?

Mar 18, 2008

Hi,

What is difference between SQL Server 2005 and SQL Server 2008?

If i want to migrate from 2005 to 2008 , what i need to do with my existing database. I mean to say how can i transfer my database from 2005 to 2008.

Thanks.

Regards
Kashif Chotu

View 15 Replies View Related

What's The Accepted Way To Retrieve Records In A SQL Table With Null Values Using A Visual Studio 2005 Table Adapter?

Jan 21, 2008

I'm using an ObjectDataSource in Visual Studio to retrieve records from a SQL Server 2005 database.
 I have a very simple dilemma.  In a table I have fields FirstName, Surname, Address1, Address2, Address3 etc. None of these are mandatory fields.
It is quite common for the user not to enter data in Address2, Address3, so the values are <null> in the SQL table.
In Visual Studio 2005 I have an aspx form where users can pass search parameters to the ObjectDataSource and the results are returned according to the passed in parameters.
The WHERE clause in my Table Adapter is:WHERE (Address1 LIKE @Address1 + '%') AND (Address2 LIKE @Address2 + '%') AND   (Address3 LIKE @Address3 + '%') AND (FirstName LIKE @FirstName + '%') AND (Surname LIKE @Surname + '%')
If, for example, I simply want to search WHERE FirstName LIKE ‘R’, this does not return any results if the value of Address3 is <null>
My query is this: Could someone please show me the best way in Visual Studio 2005 to return records even if one of the Address fields is <null>.
For reference, I have tried: Address3 LIKE @Address3 + '%' OR IS NULLThis does work, however itsimply returns every instance where Address3 is <null>  (accounting for about 95% of the records in the database). Thanks in advance Simon
 

View 9 Replies View Related

Wots The Difference B/w SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition And Express Edition

Sep 23, 2006

Hello!M a newbie.. I just want to know, that wots the difference b/w SQL Server Standard Edition and Express Edition.?And can I use Visual Studio 2005 (Professional Edition) with SQL Server Express Edition.?

View 1 Replies View Related

Performance Difference Between SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition And Enterprise Edition

Dec 15, 2006

Dear All,We have a database which contains many tables which have millions ofrecords. When We attach the database with MS SQL Server 2005 StandardEdition Server and run some queries (having joins, filters etc.) thenthey take very long time to execute while when We execute same querieson Enterprise Edition then they run 10 times faster than on standardedition.Our database does not use any features which are present in EnterpriseEdition and not present in Standard Edition. We want to know what arethe differences between Standard Edition and Enterprise Edition forperformance. Why should we go for Enterprise Edition when StandardEdition has all the features required.We are presently using evaluation versions of SQL Server 2005 Standardand Enterprise Editions.Thanks and regards,Nishant Sainihttp://www.simplyjava.com

View 23 Replies View Related

Rounding Error: Between Flat File Connection Manager Source &&amp; OLE DB Connection Destination (SQL Server 2005)

Jun 22, 2006

I have a Rounding error: Between flat file connection manager Source & OLE DB Connection Destination (SQL Server 2005) in my Dataflow.

File looks like this lets call column names Col A,B,C,D

70410000 RD1 1223631.92 196042.42
70329000 ICD 11025.84 3353.88
71167300 COL 104270.59 24676.96

flat file connection manager settings: first row Column names then Advanced tab Col A float , Col B float , Col C string ,Col D float ,

OLE DB Connection Destination (SQL Server 2005)

CREATE TABLE [dbo].[PT_CUST_ABR](

[PARTY_NO] [float] NULL,

[PARTY_NAME] [varchar](75) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL,

[TELECOMABR] [float] NULL,

[GENIABR] [float] NULL,



Problem: ColA (Source) Rounding error to PARTY_NO (Destination)
I have a field of text of in a flat file that the flat file connection manager Source picks up correctly €œ70000893€?
However when it gets the OLE DB Connection Destination the data has changed to 70000896. That€™s before its even Written to the database.
The only clue that something is wrong in the middle is the great Data viewer shows the number as 7.000009E+07
Other clues looking at the data it appears there is a rounding error on only the number that dont end in 00
ColA (Source) PARTY_NO (Destination)
71167300 71167296
70329000 70329000
70410000 70410000
Any ideas people?
Thanks in advance
Dave



View 3 Replies View Related

Difference Between SQL Mobile 2005 And SQL Compact 2005

May 24, 2007

Hello,

Could someone give me the difference between "Sql Mobile 2005" and "Sql Compact 2005".
At first I thought they were the same, that this was just something of the change in naming the server has had the last months.
My first guess was that Mobile would be the new one, but I have 'accidently' downloaded the Compact and what seems the System.data.SqlServerCE.dll is newer.

So is there a difference?
If yes, what are they.
If not, is the "compact" then the latest version and the name to be used (since on the site only "mobile" is mentioned).

Best regards,
Ike Casteleyn

View 6 Replies View Related

Difference Between Microsoft Sql Server 2008 And Microsoft Sql Server 2005

Mar 27, 2008



Pls tell me about the adjact difference between sql server 2005 and sql server 2008.
Why to upgrade for Sql Server 2008

View 1 Replies View Related

Difference Between DataTypes In SQL 2005?

Apr 11, 2006

What is the difference between binary and image dataType.

When and how should I use them?

View 1 Replies View Related

How To Tell Difference Between Sql 2005 Express

Oct 15, 2007



HI guys

I installed the SQL server 2005 express edition, but it shows in my add/remove programs as "Microsoft SQL server 2005".

Howcan I tell which version I have installed ?

View 4 Replies View Related

OLE DB DESTINATION And SQL Server Destination

Jul 4, 2007

Hey All:



I was totally confused.

When designing the SSIS dataflow part, firstly , i tried SQL Server Destination because my target server is a sql server.

then execute the task with failure.

Then i tried to use OLE DB DESTINATION instead of SQL Server Destination.

This Dataflow worked.



i can not figour out why.

By the way , i used the connection is OLE DB.And i choosed OLE DB source as the datasource cuz i can not find SQL server datasource.



Who can tell me some reasons for this?



View 9 Replies View Related

Strange Difference Between Sql 2002 And 2005.

Dec 5, 2007

hi,
I just realized that this must be a difference between sql server 2000 and 2005.
For example, the query is like this:
declare @n int
set @n = -1
select @n = employeeid from employees where companyID=1 and idnumber='1-1'
--select @n
if(@n is null)
......
If there is no such employee, in 20002, @n will be null, but in 2005, @n is -1, not null. Am I right?
So, for this piece, I have to do twice on the same where, like
if(exists(select * from employees where companyID=1 and idnumber='1-1'))
select @n=employeeid from employees where companyID=1 and idnumber='1-1'
else
set @n = null
Any better way?

Thanks.

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved