Disable Constraint Creation For Subscriber
Apr 17, 2007
Hello,
It seems we have a table that is on merge replication the table by default doesn't have a PK on it. This table only has about 50 rows of data, somewhere during the initialization process it's trying to create a PK by default on the client end. My assumption is during the creation of the snapshot a script is being generated that we do not want. How can we prevent them from happening as it's creating a PK violation.
The schema script 'if object_id(N'[dbo].[checklistimported]') is not null exec('ALTER TABLE [dbo].[checklistimported] ADD CONSTRAINT
PK_listimported PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
projectid,
chklstid,
unit,
lot
) WITH( STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
')' could not be propagated to the subscriber due to an error in creating index. A possible cause of this error is one or more join filters has the join_unique_key property se
server SQL2k5 SP1
client SQL Express
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Apr 16, 2007
Hi,
Im trying to make a replica of sqlserver 2005 replication.
In that main bottle neck is ..bulkcopying of data from publisher table and to subscriber table.
how to avoid this bulk copying while creating subscriber for a given Publisher.
regards
Baji Prasad.B
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
I know to disable all constraint in a table just :ALTER TABLE table_A CHECK CONSTRAINT ALLbut how to disable ALL tables at the same time?Thanks anyway
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jul 14, 2015
I have a merge replication in place. I increased the identity_range to 100000 for a table. I have done this both ways, via the properties of the publication on SSMS, and via TSQL. I have call sp_adjustpublisheridentityrange. Then I recreated the sanpshot.  EXEC sp_adjustpublisheridentityrange @table_name = N'Label', @table_owner = N'caseup';but after synchronization, the range defined in the table's constraint has not changed and now all of the identity values are used up. All inserts are failing.What needs to be done to force the publisher to recreate the identity range on a subscriber(s).
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 13, 2008
Hi, all.
I am trying to create table with following SQL script:
Code Snippet
create table Projects(
ID smallint identity (0, 1) constraint PK_Projects primary key,
Name nvarchar (255) constraint NN_Prj_Name not null,
Creator nvarchar (255),
CreateDate datetime
);
When I execute this script I get following error message:
Error source: SQL Server Compact ADO.NET Data Provider
Error message: Named Constraint is not supported for this type of constraint. [ Constraint Name = NN_Prj_Name ]
I looked in the SQL Server Books Online and saw following:
CREATE TABLE (SQL Server Compact)
...
< column_constraint > ::= [ CONSTRAINT constraint_name ] { [ NULL | NOT NULL ] | [ PRIMARY KEY | UNIQUE ] | REFERENCES ref_table [ ( ref_column ) ] [ ON DELETE { CASCADE | NO ACTION } ] [ ON UPDATE { CASCADE | NO ACTION } ]
As I understand according to documentation named constraints should be supported, however error message says opposite. I can rephrase SQL script by removing named constraint.
Code Snippet
create table Projects(
ID smallint identity (0, 1) constraint PK_Projects primary key,
Name nvarchar (255) not null,
Creator nvarchar (255),
CreateDate datetime
);
This script executes correctly, however I want named constraints and this does not satisfy me.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 8, 2014
We have an SSAS instance where when we run the query "select * from $system.discover_traces" the creation time in the resultset shows a different time from when we actually started the trace.
for example if we have create the trace at 3.30pm it shows 7.35 pm in the Sql server management studio resultset when we run the query "select * from $system.discover_traces".
View 0 Replies
View Related
May 13, 2008
We are using SQL CE 3.5 on tablet PCs, that synchs with our host SQL 2005 Server using Microsoft Synchronization Services. On the tablets, when inserting a record, we get the following error:
A duplicate value cannot be inserted into a unique index. [ Table name = refRegTitle,Constraint name = PK_refRegTitle
But the only PK on this table is RegTitleID.
The table structure is:
[RegTitleID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[RegTitleNumber] [int] NOT NULL,
[RegTitleDescription] [varchar](200) NOT NULL,
[FacilityTypeID] [int] NOT NULL,
[Active] [bit] NOT NULL,
The problem occurs when a Title Number is inserted and a record with that number already exists. There is no unique constraint on Title Number.
Has anyone else experienced this?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 13, 2007
Hi,
Im using transactional replication to replicate data from one database to another database.
my aim is to make a customized replication using c#. so im creating publisher and subscriber through sql code.
but main problem is if i select a table as a publisher then it will fully replace the schema of subscriber.
eg:
Before Creating a subscription
Publication Name :TestPubVer
Publisher Table-->CustomerOrder
----------------------
CustomerID
CustomerName
CustomerAddress
Subscriber Table--> Consumer
--------------------
ConsumerID
ConsumerName
ConsumerAddress
if i create a subscription , it will try to search for CustomerOrder Table , if it is not present it will create a new table with publisher schema.
if it is present then also it will replace the publisher table schema in subscriber table and a same table is created in subscriber database
To avoid this im replacing the subscriber Table name with a different table during article creation
eg:
exec sp_addarticle @publication = N'TestPubVer', @article = N'CustomerOrder', @source_owner = N'dbo', @source_object = N'CustomerOrder',
@type = N'logbased', @description = N'', @creation_script = N'', @pre_creation_cmd = N'drop', @schema_option = 0x000000000803509F,
@identityrangemanagementoption = N'none', @destination_table = N'Consumer', @destination_owner = N'dbo', @status = 24,
@vertical_partition = N'false', @ins_cmd = N'CALL [sp_MSins_dboConsumer]', @del_cmd = N'CALL [sp_MSdel_dboConsumer]',
@upd_cmd = N'SCALL [sp_MSupd_dboConsumer]'
After this i will create a subscription
After Creating a subscription
Publication Name :TestPubVer
Publisher Table-->CustomerOrder
----------------------
CustomerID
CustomerName
CustomerAddress
Subscriber Table--> Consumer
--------------------
CustomerID
CustomerName
CustomerAddress
After subscription the subscriber tablename will be same but column names are get replaced by publisher table.
How can i avoid this? i tried many ways and im running out of time.
regards
Baji Prasad.B
View 11 Replies
View Related
May 1, 2000
Additional info,
I had recently applied SP2 on two servers (publication and not working immediate updating subscriber).
I found this code in the INSERT trigger which fails
exec @retcode = OpenDataSource
('SQLOLEDB',N'SERVER=MYSERVER;UID=sa;PWD=t00bad;') .[Packageval].[dbo]. [sp_MSsync_ins_Package_1][PDBSASQL1],[Packageval],
@c1 output,@c2,@c3,@c4,@c5,@c6,@c7,@c8,@c9,@c10 output
Any idea?
Thanks
In article <8e7dqp$lii$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
skhanal@my-deja.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two servers configured as Immediate updating subscribers to the
> publication server.
>
> Everything was ok for sometime, but now when I try to insert a record
> in any table in the published database in one of the subscriber I get
> the following error.
>
> Server: Msg 7415, Level 16, State 1, Line 3
> Ad hoc access to OLE DB provider 'SQLOLEDB' has been denied. You must
> access this provider through a linked server.
>
> Inserting the same record in the other subscriber and publisher does
> not have any problem.
>
> I could not find any documentation for this error. Any help will be
> greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 24, 2001
Hi!
How is it possible to set up a repl. scenario, where a subscriber of a DB
is also the publisher of this DB for other subscribers. i mean 3 level repliction. MAINPUB
SUB1 SUB2 SUB3
notebookSUB1...................notebooksubN
SUB1..3 are subscribing to MAINSUB and publishing to a number of notebooks!
Any help would be greatly appreciated!!!
TIA
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 31, 2007
Hi,
Can we use transactional replication with updatable subscriptions when we have more updates and transactional changes at the Subscriber side??
We are using SQL Server 2005 SP1. We will be using 6 publications and 4 subscriptions for each publications, so totally 24 subscriptions. Both the Publisher and the Distributor is the same server. It is set to run in continuous mode. Type : Pull Subscriptions.
Regards,
Swapna.B.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Aug 29, 2006
Hi
I'm a bit confused right now. I am using Sql 2005 merge replication. I have a publisher and a subscriber running. Today, I updated some data in my publisher which caused 300,000 updates to be sent to the subscriber. There was no problem here, it took a while though. Later, I added a new subscriber and when it started initializing I suddenly thought that I should have really created a new snapshot, one that included the 300,000 row update. Because I didn't I was epecting that once the subscription had finished initializing from the old snapshot it would then have to apply the 300,000 row update. But it didn't seem to do this last update! But yet all the data was correct!!
Does Sql replication somehow merge the snapshot with pending updates when it creates a new subscription?
Thanks for your help
Graham
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 2, 2007
I am having a problem creating a publisher.
I have a database, MobileApp, on a server called Server03, which is a subscriber to a database Stock on Server01. I create the database as a subscriber on Server01, and it gets replicated to Server03 correctly.
I now want to use MobileApp on Server03 as a publisher to mobile devices. I click to add a new publication, and add all the tables. I get all the way to the end, but when I click on finish, I get an error for each table - 'an article with a different subscriber_upload_options value already exists for object.
Any ideas please?
Thanks
Pete
View 6 Replies
View Related
Dec 11, 2006
Hi all,
Publisher
SQL 2000 Snapshot publication timed to run at 23:00 daily All tables & views are published articles.Snapshot agent runs and creates a snapshot of all articles.
Subscriber
SQL 2005 Pull subscription set to run continuously Manually run the SQL agent job and I get the following error... 2006-12-11 15:04:35.687 Agent message code 20164. Unable to replicate a view or function because the referenced objects or columns are not present on the Subscriber.
I've tried creating the subscription database from a backup so I know all the tables & views exist and also tried just creating a blank empty database - same error.
There are no user stored procedures or functions in the database.
If I'm publishing all tables & views then why should the data & structure fail to load at the subscriber? Do I need two publications, the first containing the metadata and the second containing the data?
Thanks in advance
Dave
View 6 Replies
View Related
Aug 26, 2007
I have a clustering between Server A and Server B. There is a clustered SQL Server installed.
Server A is a primary node(oltp production server) and Server B is a secondary node.
i've set up transactional replication betw serer A and B. Server A is Publisher and Server B is subscriber. B also has a distribution database. I use serve B for all the reporting purposes.
Currently both servers have sp1.
Now i want to apply sp2 to the server B first since i use it for reporting purposes (just to make sure there are no issues and then after some days i want to apply sp2 on server A which is my prodction oltp server)
So when i apply sp2 on server B , my publisher will have SP1 and subscriber (& distributor) will have sp2. Will this cause any issues with replication?
Any help would be appriciated.
Thanks
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 14, 2002
Is there a way to disable trigger for a time window and enable it when desired.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 12, 2001
Is it possible to disable a trigger to manually manipulate data without completely removing it? Thank you.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 26, 2000
A quick question, how can I disable identity for the identity column
without dropping that column? Thanks!
Xiao
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 28, 2000
Is there a way to disable logging ?
I'm about to split a 1000000 rows table into three other tables , and would prefere not to log this action ...
Does anyone know how to do it in a SQL 7.0 statement ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 21, 2001
I don't seem to be able to find a command to disable triggers. Can this
be done in SQL7?
Thanks.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 11, 2001
Is it possible to disable a trigger in SQL Server 6.5?
Is so, how can i do that?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 2, 1999
read-only option
dbo-use option
...
Anyone any ideas ?!?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2004
Hi,
can I disable a trigger in Sqlserver 2000??? When i run a store procedure who works with one table i want that the trigger doesn´t work it. After that the trigger would be enabled again.
I know i can delete it and create it again but something like "ALTER TRIGGER DISABLED" would be ok.
Thanks.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 23, 2004
Sorry, may be it is very simple, but
how can I disable all trigger on a tabled under sql 2000
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 20, 2014
CDC is disabling when we do bulkinsertsupdateschange schema .how to findout why CDC disabled and how to prevent it ?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 24, 2007
Hi,
Is there any way to disable the primary key constraint?.I want to move the records from one table to another.say column 'x' in the source table doesnt contain a primay key.But my target table column 'x' contains primay key.
How to ovecome this problem?
Thanks in advance
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 30, 2007
Hello all.
Could anyone advise me how to disable indexes on a specific table at the start of a script, then re-enable them at the end?
Thanks all.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 28, 2008
I am looking for a way to disable DatabaseMail90.exe (temporarily) while still allowing emails to queue up.
At first, I thought the solution was sysmail_stop_sp... but if I use this... calls to sp_send_DBMail fail with the following message:
Mail not queued. Database Mail is stopped. Use sysmail_start_sp to start Database Mail.
I'd like the emails to be queued... I just want to postpone sending them. Anyone know how to do this?
- Alan D. Nelson
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
In meen. primary keys, NOT NULL, IDENTETIES...et.cI have to do a maunally, one time, building of a database. Sometables has tostay an some are to be exchanged. The foreignkey inforcemnt ill do for myself so everything is correct. I just need to be allowed to de thede taskfor a while. Is it impossible?RegardsAnders
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 6, 2008
I am trying to disable certain users, but it is giving me this error. I am able to disable some accounts, but not all of them. It seems to happen with user that have been recently created.
TITLE: Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio
------------------------------
Disable Login. failed for Login 'domainuser'. (Microsoft.SqlServer.Smo)
For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&ProdVer=9.00.3042.00&EvtSrc=Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Smo.ExceptionTemplates.FailedOperationExceptionText&EvtID=Disable+Login.+Login&LinkId=20476
------------------------------
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch. (Microsoft.SqlServer.ConnectionInfo)
------------------------------
Could not obtain information about Windows NT group/user 'domainuser', error code 0x5. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 15404)
For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&ProdVer=09.00.3042&EvtSrc=MSSQLServer&EvtID=15404&LinkId=20476
The links lead to a page that is no longer available.
I read somewhere that it had to do with the SQL Server service account and that if you change it to a Domain Administrator it would and it does, but I can not believe the solution. I would say that this even started happening after we applied SQL 2005 Service Pack 2.
Has anyone else seen this problem. Do I really need to make it a Domain Administrator?
Thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related