Disabling Repl Error (22538)

Feb 2, 2007

Posted - 02/01/2007 : 22:35:02





one week ago, for testing purpose, I set up trans repl, trans repl with updateable, snapshot repl using the same instance.

configuration is like this,

publisher and distributor are on the same server, 2 remote subscribers, one is 2000, the other is 2005.

It works OK, today I am trying to disable the replicaiton, clean up the machine. keep getting the errors:

an exception occurred while executing a T-SQL statement or batch
only replicaiton jobs,or job schedules can be added, modified,dropped or viewed through replicaiton SPs
could not update the distribution database subscription table, the subscription status could not be changed.
changed database context to 'master',(MSSQL SERVER error 22538)


Please help


publisher: 2005 Standard SP2 CTP

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Error 627: Transactional Repl. SQL 7.0

Nov 11, 1999

The problem case for transactional replication in MS SQL 7.0 is as follows:
Server A (intended publisher)
Server B (distributor, intended subscriber)

When configuring replication, the distributor (B) can be configured easily; the publisher (A) that uses B as its distributor will not allow for a publication to be created using either the Enterprise Manager wizards or TSQL commands. The error '627: Cannot use SAVE TRANSACTION within a distributed transaction' occurs when creating the publication.

Any suggestions; I need some help ASAP.

Thanks

View 3 Replies View Related

Disable Repl Error

Feb 2, 2007

one week ago, for testing purpose, I set up trans repl, trans repl with updateable, snapshot repl using the same instance.

configuration is like this,

publisher and distributor are on the same server, 2 remote subscribers, one is 2000, the other is 2005.

It works OK, today I am trying to disable the replicaiton, clean up the machine. keep getting the errors:

an exception occurred while executing a T-SQL statement or batch
only replicaiton jobs,or job schedules can be added, modified,dropped or viewed through replicaiton SPs
could not update the distribution database subscription table, the subscription status could not be changed.
changed database context to 'master',(MSSQL SERVER error 22538)

View 2 Replies View Related

Merge Repl. Error OS 3

Jul 12, 2007

I am trying to set up a merge replication between SQL 2005 and SQL Express. When I try to apply the snapshot to the SQL Express database. I get the error "Can not access filepathSnapshot.pre due to error OS 3"



Does anyone know what OS error 3 applies to?



Also, when I try to place the snapshop in the default folder location say D:ReplicationData the create snapshot process will work. If I try to place the snapshot folder not in the default and in a UNC like this \serverIPReplicationData I get an access error. sqlAgent has access to the share, which is fully shared out. Any ideas?

View 1 Replies View Related

Any Advice On Transact Repl Error

Nov 14, 2007

Hi All, We are using SQL2000 servers with transact replication to a warmstand-by server. We are seeing the following error from the Log readeragents.Does anyone have any insight on this error?The process could not execute 'sp_MSadd_repl_commands27hp'TIA Scott B.

View 3 Replies View Related

Need Help! About SQLServerAgent Account In Repl...

Aug 9, 2000

When I using Create Publication Wizard for database 'MY DATABASE', and setup 'MY SERVER' as the Distributor, then I get a message:

SQLServer Agent on 'MY SERVER' current uses a system acount, which cause replication between servers to fail. In the following dialog, specify a domain account for the Service startup account.

I don't understand this message (current in SQL Server Agent properties, tab Service startup account using System account)? Anyone can explain to me?

View 1 Replies View Related

Max Text Repl Size (B)

Nov 4, 2003

Is it safe to change 'max text repl size (B)' on a live system while it is running with users and services running?? I'm using SQL Server 7.0 running on Windows 2000.

View 2 Replies View Related

Add Article To Merge Repl. Publication

Apr 22, 2004

I am running merge replication (SQL 2000 with SP2) with an anonymous pull subscription. The application vendor has come out with update that requires adding a table to a database. The vendor has created scripts that will add the table, as well as some stored procedures. If I apply the scripts to both servers and add the table as a new article to the publication, am I going to have to apply a snapshot of the entire database (which is very large)?

Your help is greatly appreciated.

Gary

View 3 Replies View Related

Merge Repl. Between 2000 & 2005

Sep 15, 2006

I'm in trouble again. I want to make merge replication between SS 2000 Enterprise and SS 2005 Express edition. 2000 will be publisher, 2005 will be subscriber. In addition I want to use push subsription at 2000 side, very last thing is it will be download only (I know how to make a merge rep. downloadonly, thanks god!). That's all I want to do.

I made a little search, it seems what I want can't be done automatically, using SMO or scripts is suggested. In one of other forums I saw "distibuter>=publisher>=subsriber" (refering sql server versions). Is it an incontestable truth that I cannot make SS 2000 a publisher where SS 2005 Express is subscriber?

How can I achieve my goal, isn't there anyway to make 2000 publisher for merge replication while a 2005 Express is subscriber?

Thanks

abdul

View 1 Replies View Related

How To Solve This Sudden Repl Problem?

Nov 23, 2006

Hi,
We're running a replicationprocess for months now, and 2 days ago it broke down, for no appearant reason I can detect. The setup is this:
A SQL2K server has a publication defined on a database, consisting of several dozen tables. It is a transactional publication, running continuously. There is 1 subscriber, a SQL2005. Both servers run with Win2003 and all have the latest servicepacks.
Up until 2 days ago there was hardly a problem. Then I received errormessages on being unable to load into a specific table. That table had been changed on that day, namely, 1 column was changed from CHAR(13) to CHAR(12). I do not know if this has any relation with the problem we experience.
Currently the databases are structural the same. I could not get the replicationprocess to work and deleted all, publication on server1 and subscription on server2. I tried to setup a new transactional publication, which is not a problem, however, I cannot create a succesful subscription. I receive the message:

The process could not bulkcopy into table 'Tablename', where tablename is the changed table...

Again, both tables in publisher and subscruiber are the same in all respects. When I remove the offending table from the publication, the same message now with another tablename... Removing this table will result in again this message with another tablename...

I am really flabbergasted. Any idea where to look at?

TIA

View 3 Replies View Related

Repl.Pending Xacts Question

Aug 2, 2006

We have VLDBs running on a SQL 2005 server. Some users have questioned speed and response times. When I investigated the server (W2K3) using the perfomrance monitor, I noticed an interesting questionabel result. The Repl. Pending Xacts showed 44,000,000 transactions waiting to be delived to the distribution databse. Problem is - we do not have replication tunred on on any of the db's on the box. In my research, I have not noticed anyone with a similiar issue. Does this amount of transaction take up space, or is it simply a counter that I don't have to be worried about?

View 4 Replies View Related

Merge Repl/new Bcp Files After 2005 Upgrade

May 27, 2008

I'll start off by saying these questions were submitted to Microsoft and no
one can give us an answer without them doing a source code review. Their
response was "these are internal BCP scripts that are used by SQL"....yes, I
know that....that doesn't help to explain why the system created them. At
this point, I don't want my compary to pay support hours for Microsoft
personnel to learn what their software does.
--------------------
We've had merge publication in place for several years.

Last year, we added some tables/articles to publications.

After the upgrade from SQL Server 2000 SP4 Standard to SQL Server 2005 SP2
Standard, when the snapshot was run, the system created some new files that
had never existed before. Also, and more importantly, these files were only
created for the articles added after the initial snapshot was created.
Articles existing in the intial snapshot did not have these type of files
created.

Examples of these files for a SA_MOVE table that was added to an existing
publication:

MSmerge_contents_SA_MOVE.bcp
MSmerge_contents_SA_MOVE_forall.bcp
MSmerge_rowtrack_SA_MOVE90.bcp
sysmergesubsetfilters_SA_MOVE.bcp
sysmergesubsetfilters_SA_MOVE90.bcp


Also some new bcps created were:

MSmerge_contents90_forall.bcp
MSmerge_genhistory90.bcp
MSmerge_rowtrack90.bcp
sysmergesubsetfilters90.bcp


The system wanted to apply these files before it would start synchronizing
data so they had to be delivered to the subscriber. It appears it was the
sysmergesubsetfilters_ files that it wanted to apply. These are all 0 in
size and we do not have filter on(at least not as far as I know...see the
addmergearticle code below).

New databases created this year that had all of the articles defined in the
publication before the initial snapshot was taken did not get these
additional files created, nor did the system want to try to send files to the
subscriber before syncrhonization could begin.

This is an example of how an article had been cretead under SQL Server 2000
when adding a new database, before an initial snapshot is run:

exec sp_addmergearticle @publication = N'Last', @article = N'SA_MOVE',
@source_owner = N'dbo', @source_object = N'SA_MOVE', @type = N'table',
@description = null, @column_tracking = N'true', @pre_creation_cmd = N'drop',
@creation_script = null, @schema_option = 0x000000003000EFF1,
@article_resolver = null, @subset_filterclause = null, @vertical_partition =
N'false', @destination_owner = N'dbo', @verify_resolver_signature = 0,
@allow_interactive_resolver = N'false', @fast_multicol_updateproc = N'true',
@check_permissions = 0

This is an example of how an article was added under SQL Server 2000 to an
existing publication that already had the initial snapshot run:

exec sp_addmergearticle @publication = N'Last', @article = N'SA_MOVE',
@source_owner = N'dbo', @source_object = N'SA_MOVE', @type = N'table',
@description = null, @column_tracking = N'true', @pre_creation_cmd = N'drop',
@creation_script = null, @schema_option = 0x000000000000EFF1,
@article_resolver = null, @subset_filterclause = null, @vertical_partition =
N'false', @destination_owner = N'dbo', @auto_identity_range = N'false',
@verify_resolver_signature = 0, @allow_interactive_resolver = N'false',
@fast_multicol_updateproc = N'true', @check_permissions = 0,
@force_invalidate_snapshot = 1


A few questions:

Does anyone have an idea why the system created these files are part of the
2005 upgrade?

What is the real purpose of the files with names such as _forall.bcp ?

Thanks for any help/info on this,

Doug

View 2 Replies View Related

Rebuilding The System Merge Repl Indexes

Jan 17, 2007

Hi,

We have a client that has a large (5Gb) database replicated to 13 subscribers, the publisher is Sql 2005, the subscribers are Sql Express. The publication has as few filtered articles too. I have found that after several months of continuous running Replication Monitor is taking a long time to report history on each subscriber.

Do people tend to rebuild the indexes on the system merge replication tables on production servers, or should the standard replication jobs take care of this?

Thanks for your help

Graham

View 6 Replies View Related

Not Applying The Initial Snapshot When Setting Up Tran Repl.

Jul 20, 2005

I am setting up a combination of transactional and merge replicationon a very large database and do not want to apply the initial snapshotsince this would take to long. I am doing this with scripts that werepreviosly created when the database was not this big. I want to copythe publisher DB over to the Subscriber Server. Can I use theparameter @sync_type to 'none' when running the sp_addsubscription?Does anyone have any experience in doing this?Thanks in Advance for any help on this.Alan

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL 2005 Merge Repl Suddenly Stopped Working

Mar 28, 2006

Hello...

We have had Merge Replication working for the past few months (SQL 2005 to SQL Mobile) and suddenly today the replication URL that points to the SqlCESA30.DLL does not work. I have tried re-running the SQL Mobile virtual folder wizard a few times....resetting IIS and even a re-boot...and still the URL is not available.

Is there anything that might provide some clue as to why this has unexpectedly failed?

thanks for any help!

- will

View 3 Replies View Related

Can Not Generate Snapshot (SQl Server 2005 Transactional Repl )

Sep 15, 2005

Hi,

View 6 Replies View Related

Transactional Repl, Diffe Table Names, Diff Columns

Mar 22, 2007

Hello,

I've been able to startup a transactional replication between 2 database for some tables that only have different table names. Now there are still some tables that not only have different names but also different column names, can this be done in the wizzard ??



Thx

View 3 Replies View Related

Trigger - Disabling

May 18, 2001

I need to disable a trigger for a week w/o droping it. Is there a way in sql ?

Thanks and nice week-end.

Ivan

View 2 Replies View Related

Job Is Disabling Every Night

Apr 12, 2002

Please help if you can! I have setup a job that runs every day on an hourly basis. Every morning I find that it's been disabled. The funny thing is is that the schedule is disabled, but the job is not (you see 'Enabled' in the jobs list in EM, but when you view the schedules tab, it's disabled.) Also, it runs a several times before becoming disabled.

TIA,

Colleen

View 2 Replies View Related

Disabling Replication

Jan 9, 2003

I have a server that was being used for logshipping and had
replication set up at some point as well. One of the databases got out
of sync in the logshipping process so I removed logshipping and was
going to reinitialize the database and set up the logshipping again.
The database is in read only mode and when I try to take it out of
read only I get the following message:

Error 5063: Database 'XXXXXXXX' is in warm standby. A warm stanby
database is read-only. ALTER DATABASE statment failed. sp_dboption
command failed.

I have tried to disable replication on the server but get the
following error message:

SQL Server Enterprise Manager could not disable 'SRVXXXX' as a
publisher.
Error 3906: Could not run BEGIN TRANSACTION in database 'XXXXXXX'
because the database is read only.

So my problem is that I can't take the database out of read-only mode
because of replication and I can't disable replication because the
database is in read-only mode.

Has anyone come across this before and how should I resolve it? I
tried dropping the database as well and that didn't work either.

Any ideas or help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance,

Brad

View 1 Replies View Related

Disabling The Trigger

Mar 25, 2003

Hi,

I have a update trigger on a table. Can I disable this trigger for duration of a job which updates this table.

Thanks in advance ...j

View 1 Replies View Related

Disabling Triggers

Feb 15, 2001

Is there a way to disable a trigger when performing a transaction besides dropping and recreating the trigger? I am trying to perform an insert on a table, and this keeps firing a trigger that I want to disable.

Any help is appreciated.

View 3 Replies View Related

Disabling Distribution DB

May 28, 2008

I have accidentally registered an existing database as a distribution database, which made it a system database.
the data itself is safe and sound, but I want to undo the whole thing.

How can I do this?

View 1 Replies View Related

Disabling Job Using VBScript

Jun 6, 2008

I have an SQL job that runs a .vbs script. It has the following code:

Cmd2.ActiveConnection = Conn2
Cmd2.CommandText = "USE msdb EXEC sp_update_job @job_name = 'Email Download',@enabled = 0"
Cmd2.CommandType = 1
Cmd2.Execute()

It's not disabling the job. If I execute in Query Analyzer, it works. I'm thinking it might be a permissions issue. Any suggestions?

TIA

View 10 Replies View Related

Disabling Primary Key

Jul 20, 2005

Hii have a table with primary key defined on col1 and col2. now i want tohave col3 also included in primary key. when i alter the table it givesme error for duplicate rows. there is an option for 'with nocheck' butit only works with check or foreign key constraint. is there any optionin sql server like in oracle 'no validate' which doesnt validate theexisting data and force the data validation from new records.thanxFarid*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!

View 5 Replies View Related

Disabling All Logins

Dec 4, 2007

Hi all,


1) Can anybody provide me the script for DISABLING all the jobs in the server and vice versa (i.e.) for enabling also.


2) Script for DISABLING LOGINS and script for ENABLING all Logins.

Its Sql Server 2005


Thanks... Any Help Greatly appreciated.

View 6 Replies View Related

Queue Not Disabling

Oct 11, 2006

HI There

My activated proc is rolling back the transaction and putting the message abck on the queue infinately ?

Normally it disabled the queue after a few rollbacks, i can see in the sql log that it just keeps rolling back and re-activating thousands of times.

It only stops when i disable activation on the queue.

WHy is the queue not disabling ?

Thanx

View 3 Replies View Related

Disabling The TransactionLog

Sep 20, 2006

I have an SSIS task that transforms 70 million rows of data nightly.

The data is dumped and imported fresh every day.

Obviously I don't want my production Transaction Log getting cluttered up with 70 million rows of transaction logs daily.

Is there any way to avoid logging to the transaction log with an SSIS task?

View 5 Replies View Related

Constraint Disabling

Dec 20, 2006

Hi,

Is there any way to disable/enable constraints on the table?

Command "ALTER TABLE table_name {CHECK|NOCHECK} CONSTRAINT ALL" produces error.

View 8 Replies View Related

Disabling Foreign Key Constraints

Dec 22, 2000

I want to disable foreign key constraints en mass. Is there a way to do this?

I know that I can go into each table and navigate to the Relationship tab of Properties and uncheck the "Enforce relationship for INSERTs and UPDATEs" box, but I'd much prefer to automate this process with a query since there are 160+ tables and probably 200+ relationships to disable.

I figure that sysconstraints my be the ticket, but I will keep experimenting until I get the right solution. In the meantime, any insight to steer me in the right direction is appreciated.

View 1 Replies View Related

Disabling Publication Using SQL DMO. URGENT!!!!!!!!

Oct 29, 1999

Hi,
I'm using DMO (SQLOLE65.dll) to programmatically replicate selected publications. The Publication object supports a property called Enabled, which can be set to FALSE. I'm setting the enabled property to TRUE for those publications that need be replicated, and make the others FALSE. Still, all publications get replicated. [I give DoAlter to commit the changes i made.]
Any solution,Please mail me ASAP to venkateswaranb@synectics.soft.net

Thanks,
Venkat

View 2 Replies View Related

Disabling FOREIGN KEY Constraint...

Jan 11, 2007

sql 2000, northwind databse

code in sql analyzer:


Code:


ALTER TABLE categories NOCHECK CONSTRAINT ALL
TRUNCATE TABLE categories
ALTER TABLE categories CHECK CONSTRAINT ALL



but still i am getting the error:

Quote: Server: Msg 4712, Level 16, State 1, Line 2
Cannot truncate table 'categories' because it is being referenced by a FOREIGN KEY constraint.

what i need to do is write a query that just cleans all the tables of all data.

View 4 Replies View Related

Disabling Named Pipes

Jul 23, 2005

In the process of doing some routine monitoring/clean-up we'vediscovered that several (many?) users are apparently set to access ourSQL Server 2000 database instances via the Named Pipes protocol. Inreadings and recommendations we've decided that our WAN would be bestserved if we use the less "chatty" TCP/IP.As such we've also decided to try to enforce this decision to useTCP/IP exclusively using the domain login script used by all of ourend-users.Question: does anyone know what registry entries are created/used toindicate that TCP/IP is enabled and is the default protocol for SQLServer 2000? Our environment is: XP Pro SP2 and SQL Server 2000(typically SP3).TIAGlenn - newbie DBA

View 5 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved