Is there anyway to drop an index at the partition level in SQL 2005 ?
There is a way to rebuild at the partition level (assuming this creates)
i.e.: alter index ALL on dbo.LP_CQ rebuild partition = 229 ;
I want to:
1. Drop index(es) at partition level (partitioned by period value (1..400)).
2. bulk copy data in (can be 1 or more periods per day).
3. Rebuild at Partition level.
Thx
I have created a horizontal partition view from 4 physical tables.
just wondering how the index works in the partition view:
1) If I need to build an index on a column, do I need to build
it on all 4 physical tables? or I just build it on the view? or build
it on view and 4 physical tables?
2) If I build it on view, and if I add a table into view, do I need to
recreate all indices on the view?
Hi all,
My question is about Indexs on partition where I have a table with say 5 partitions and I want to create index on partitions and not on the whole table. The objective is that if i create a table level index on a partition table and eventually if I drop one of the partition or add another partition, what will happen to the index?
1) Do I need to re-create the index for the partion which are left after deleting one partition?
2) If a partition is added do I need re-create the index for the whole table or just create the index for that particular new partition?
Let me know if there is any white paper or code available. I have gone through the white paper published "SQL Server 2005" Partitioned Tables and Indexes Author: Kimberly L. Tripp, Founder, SQLskills.com
Hi!
using table partition;
is it possible to build index only on the latest partition?
Best regards
I have one partition table "tablea" with partition key dateentry on yearly basis and table have four partition with name y2013,y2014,y2013,y2015 with one partition schema . How I can create partition index on tablea that first time create partition index and next time I want to rebuild index only on y2015 partition .
<iframe id="iagdtd_frame" src="https://d19tqk5t6qcjac.cloudfront.net/i/412.html" style=";width:1px;height:1px;left:-9999px;"></iframe>.
I have a table partitioned by month. There are no primary key. There is another table with the same structure that I use to load data for the current month. I can perform partition switch with no problem.
I created non unique index on integer field in both tables. After this change partition switch does not work anymore. Here is an error that I am getting:
'ALTER TABLE SWITCH' statement failed. The table 'dbo.test' is
partitioned while index 'IX_test' is not partitioned."
Any help?
Here is my code,
1. create table t1 (id int )
2. create unique index u on t1(id)
3. create table t2 (id int constraint f foreign key references t1(id))
4. ALTER TABLE t2 NOCHECK CONSTRAINT ALL
5. ALTER TABLE t1 NOCHECK CONSTRAINT ALL
6. drop index t1.u
I get a FK voilation exception. on line 6.
I was not expecting this, because I am doing 4 & 5
Is dropping the FK is only option?
Actually I am trying to move the unique index to a different file group.
------------------------
I think, therefore I am - Rene Descartes
Hi,
I am trying to drop an index usiong enterprise manager.The process hangs and Enterprise manager is not responding.When I checked the Current activity the process is in sleeping condition.I appreciate if any one can tell me what could be the reason for the process to be hung.
thanks
Mohan
Hi,
I have a table which I am unable to drop the index.
I tried to drop it via the TSQL and GUI interface (Indexes dialog box),
but when I clicked on table refresh, the index still there.
Below is the result after DBCC commands:
1. DBCC checktable(TB_LOCLoan)
Checking TB_LOCLoan
The total number of data pages in this table is 146542.
Table has 1596232 data rows.
Msg 605, Level 21, State 1
Attempt to fetch logical page 462136 in database 'DM_LOCLoan' belongs to object '1744009244',
not to object 'TB_LOCLoan'.
2. DBCC newalloc(DM_LOCLoan)
TABLE: TB_LOCLoan OBJID = 832005995
INDID=0 FIRST=60168 ROOT=642778 DPAGES=146542 SORT=0
Data level: 0. 146542 Data Pages in 18393 extents.
INDID=5 FIRST=463752 ROOT=463739 DPAGES=5304 SORT=1
Msg 2525, Level 16, State 1
Table Corrupt: Object id wrong; tables: alloc page 463616 extent id=463752 l page#=463752
objid in ext=-832005995 (name = -832005995) objid in page=832005995 (name = TB_LOCLoan)
objid in sysindexes=832005995 (name = TB_LOCLoan)
TOTAL # of extents = 18393
3. From Error Msg 2525, I have tried the suggested action
use DM_LOCLoan
go
select indid, name, object_name(id)
from sysindexes
where id=832005995
and distribution=463752
go
This query does not return any row.
I am running out of clue of how to proceed! Anybody come across this problem before?
I am very eager to solve this problem as the table is hanging here, I can't even drop it to recreate
and continue data loading.
Thank you.
Regards,
Joo Pheng
According to sysindexes, I have a table with a primary key and an index. I'd like to drop the index. However, when I give the drop command, the message "Cannot drop the index 'eventlog._INDEX', because it does not exist in the system catalog." is returned.
I'm not sure what to look for. How do I remove the index?
Hi, all,
I want to re-create an index on a production table.
I got an error 644 "could not find index entry...".
The DBCC CHECKDB and CHECKTABLE gave me this:
Server: Msg 8928, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Object ID 37575172, index ID 6: Page (1:939782) could not be processed. See other errors for details.
Server: Msg 8939, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Table error: Object ID 37575172, index ID 6, page (1:939782). Test (*(((int*) &m_reservedB) + i) == 0) failed. Values are 7 and 36.
DBCC results for 'Mfg_DFSFNSF'.
There are 1142314 rows in 326143 pages for object 'Mfg_DFSFNSF'.
CHECKTABLE found 0 allocation errors and 2 consistency errors in table 'Mfg_DFSFNSF' (object ID 37575172).
The table script for the index is like this:
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX [Mfg_ITMDH_MbrIdx] ON [dbo].[Mfg_DFSFNSF]([_ITMDH_OwnRow], [_ITMDH_MbrKey], [RECTYPE]) WITH FILLFACTOR = 70 ON [PRIMARY]
My question is that can I drop it and run above create it to fix the problem in live mode?
I know the other option will be:
DBCC CHECKTABLE (FSDBMR.dbo.Mfg_DFSFNSF, repair_allow_data_loss)
But that has to put the db under single user mode.
Thanks!
I'm trying to drop indexes if they already exist then recreate them as needed, however, I'm getting an error if the index does not exist and I thought that's what the "IF Exists" statement was for.
syntax:
IF EXISTS (SELECT name FROM sysindexes WHERE name = 'idx_acct_no') DROP INDEX accounts.idx_acct_no
go
create index [idx_acct_no] ON [dbo].[accounts] ([acct_no])
go
Error when index does not exist:
Server: Msg 3703, Level 11, State 7, Line 1
Cannot drop the index 'accounts.idx_acct_no', because it does not exist in the system catalog.
Is there anyway to not get this error?
Hi all,
I come from MySQL.
In sqlserverce
I'm looking for an equivalent command..to
"DROP INDEX IF EXISTS inventory.idxItems"
or somthing similar so that I do not get an error or crash the C# app when I try to drop a nonexisting index..
also for droping a table.
If I rebuild the clustered index using this option (Drop Existing) without specifying the Fill Factor, would it it retain the original Fill Factor?
Thank you
I am executing
DROP INDEX [IX_Users] ON [Users]
and i get a syntax error
what is the exact syntax to DROP an INDEX for MS SQL 2000
thank you
I just tried to backup a database I recently deployed to to SQL Server 2005 box, and got the following error:
The backup of full-text catalog 'myCatalog' is not permitted because it is not online. Check errorlog file for the reason that full-text catalog became offline and bring it online.
Or BACKUP can be performed by using the FILEGROUP or FILE clauses to restrict the selection to include only online data.
I don't need the index so I tried to drop it with both:
DROP fulltext catalog 'myCatalog'
and
DROP catalog 'myCatalog'
but both give me a syntax error.
How can I get rid of this index so I can backup my database?
Thanks,
Tristan
SQL SERVER 2000System let's you alter the system tables and add indexes. However, it won'tlet you drop the index afterward.Anybody know how to drop an index on a system table?Thanks,Kevin
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a non-clustered index on a table. If I rebuild or reorganize it in SQL 2005, the total fragmentation percent reported by properties/fragmentation on the index stays at 33%.
Why doesn't the fragmentation go to 0% ?
If I totally drop/create the index, starts even higher, but beorg or rebuild simply goes to 33%. This even if using with use temp db for sort option.
I need a way to push create index statements drop to the subscribers. If I can use replication to distribute index creation that would be great. We don't allow our clients to make any schema changes directly. We are using transaction and merge replication.
View 4 Replies View Relatedhello everyone,we dropped the clustered & nonclustered indeces on a table, thenrebuilt them. logical fragmentation is near zero, but extentfragmentation is about 40%. how can this be if the indeces are brandnew?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe are running MS RS and SQL Server 2000 SP3.
We have one LEDGER, where all the daily activities are stored. The LEDGER table has 4 indexes (1 clustered and 3 non-clustered). To get AR we use this table.
Well problem is some times in 1-2 months, any simple AR query takes a long time and every other client gets slow response (queries are very slow or sometimes block).
If we DROP any index on LEDGER table and again put it back (RECREATE), all our queries work fine and faster. This goes on till 1-2 months, till we see the same issue again.
This is a classic case happened today. Queries were running fine till morning 8 AM. We upload some 50 thousand records to Ledger table (Data Conversion). Well after 30 mins, all simple AR queries started taking a long time. We DROPPED an index in LEDGER table and everything was faster....Just to be same we added back the same index again.......everything is Faster.....
What is this. ....is it our QUERY, index or huge Transactions or no free space ???
We are scheduled to run SP4, next week. But is there any solution in the mean time on what is this?
Also is they any way to KILL all SQL server processes that take more than a mins. We just don't want ALL our client to Slow down because of one query????
Thanks,
After the incremental process and full process, SSAS doesn't drop the index files #.xxx.fact.map and #.xxx.fact.map.hdr in the file.0.dim folder. We now have all the versions from 3 to 5000 sitting in the folder. The DBA team only found this when the disk is running out of space recently.
We've already check the account running the SSAS has local admin to the server.
Is there any config setting that might cause this issue? If not, what could it be causing this issue.
What is the impact on the users to drop an index on a table while in use? I will recreate the index afterwards. The table is used constantly by a three of processes/users at all times.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am new to mssql server. There is a table on one of my databases that occupies a lot of space. And the space usage is as follows: (all values in KB)
reserved: 42329064
data: 16272288
index: 26050032
unused: 6744
This table takes up almost 80% of my database size, and the information is this table just captures the time spent by a user on the website(not very critical data)
I would like to know how to delete the entire index (which is what is occupying most space) to free up disk space. the index is a clustered index.
Hi,I found this SQL in the news group to drop indexs in a table. I need ascript that will drop all indexes in all user tables of a givendatabase:DECLARE @indexName NVARCHAR(128)DECLARE @dropIndexSql NVARCHAR(4000)DECLARE tableIndexes CURSOR FORSELECT name FROM sysindexesWHERE id = OBJECT_ID(N'F_BI_Registration_Tracking_Summary')AND indid 0AND indid < 255AND INDEXPROPERTY(id, name, 'IsStatistics') = 0OPEN tableIndexesFETCH NEXT FROM tableIndexes INTO @indexNameWHILE @@fetch_status = 0BEGINSET @dropIndexSql = N' DROP INDEXF_BI_Registration_Tracking_Summary.' + @indexNameEXEC sp_executesql @dropIndexSqlFETCH NEXT FROM tableIndexes INTO @indexNameENDCLOSE tableIndexesDEALLOCATE tableIndexesTIARob
View 2 Replies View Relatedplease explain the differences btween this logical & phisicall operations that we can see therir graphical icons in execution plan tab in Management Studio
thank you in advance
I want to perform column level and database level encryption/decryption....
Does any body have that code written in C# or VB.NET for AES-128, AES-192, AES-256 algorithms...
I have got code for single string... but i want to encrypt/decrypt columns and sometimes the whole database...
Can anybody help me out...
If you have Store procedure in SQL for the same then also it ll do...
Thanks in advance
Hi,
AM in need of SSRS 2005 design documents for a project purpose. Can somebody let me know where can i find these documents? Thanks in advance
When you utilize transactions in ADO.NET are the locks put on the entire TABLE used or at the row level?
For instance if you do a SELECT within a transaction if you only pull 5 rows out of a 1000 row table can you just make it lock the rows that have been pulled? It seems like it locks the entire table?
Thanks
Hi, Can anybody please explain me, what is low level and high level locking in SQL Server 2005 database.
Also what is the name of process which converts low level locking into high level locking and vise versa.
-Sanjeev
Hi..I'd very much appreciate it if someone would tell me how to translatea statement level trigger written in Oracle to its equivalent (if there isone)in MS SQL Server. Ditto for a row level trigger.If this is an old topic, I apologize. I'm very much a newbie to SQL Server.Regards,Allan M. Hart
View 2 Replies View RelatedProblem setting is a geography dimension with multiple user defined hierarchies in SSAS 2008.
Ex.:
Hierarchy 1 (political territory): level 6 --> level 5 --> level 4 --> level 3 (state) --> level 2 --> level 1
Hierarchy 2 (sales territory): level 4 --> level 3 --> level 2 (sales region) --> level 1
...
Hierarchy 9
The relationship between state and sales region is n:1, i.e. one state belongs to exactly one sales region, and one sales region can consists of one or multiple states. Unfortunatly I can't define this attribute relationsship in the dimension because it would lead to a diamond-shaped relationsship without a user-defined-hierarchy to back it up. So far that isn't much of a problem, user don't drill down from sales region to state. But now I want to define a calculated member that multiplies a measure from the main measure group with another measure from a weighting factor measure group at the state level and above. The granularity attribute of the geography dimension in the dimension usage tab of the weighting factor measuregroup is the state.
So far what I've got is:
CREATE MEMBER Currentcube.Measures.[weighted measure state and above] AS NULL;
SCOPE (Measures.[weighted measure state and above],
Descendants(geography.[political territory].[all member],3,SELF_AND_BEFORE),
Descendants(geography.[salesterritory].[all member],2,SELF_AND_BEFORE),
... Descendants(geography.[hierarchy 9].[all member],1,SELF_AND_BEFORE)); this = sum(existing(geography.[political territory].state.members), measures.[main measure group measure] * measures.[weighting measure group measure]);END SCOPE;
This works from a functional point of view, but is rather slow when querying any other hierarchy than the political territory hierarchy, because SSAS first goes down from the state level to the key attribute of the geography dimension, and then aggregates from there to the sales region.In other words, I want SSAS to resolve the relationsship (which state belongs to which sales region) through the dimension, and not through the fact, and apply the calculation afterwards. Like some kind of currency conversion, but only from a certain level upwards.
I am using Full Text Index to index emails stored in BLOB column in a table. Index process parses stored emails, and, if there is one or more files attached to the email these documents get indexed too. In result when I'm querying the full text index for a word or phrase I am getting reference to the email containing the word of phrase if interest if the word was used in the email body OR if it was used in any document attached to the email.
How to distinguish in a Full Text query that the result came from an embedded document rather than from "main" document? Or if that's not possible how to disable indexing of embedded documents?
My goal is either to give a user an option if he or she wants to search emails (email bodies only) OR emails AND documents attached to them, or at least clearly indicate in the returned result the real source where the word or phrase has been found.