Dual Xeon Or Dual P4 For SQL Server?
Jul 20, 2005
I am planning to build a server to be used as a SQL Server and web server.
Right now I can only use a single box for both.
I have read some threads were dual processors are having problems with some
parallel queries and the suggestions of having sql server use a single CPU.
My budget is limited so I am debating whether to get 2.6G dual xeon 533FSB
or dual P4 800FSB (DRR@ ram) or stick with a speedy single cpu.
If I get a dual cpu motherboard, is it a good idea to have 1 cpu used for
sql server and the other for everything else?
John Dalberg
View 5 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jul 23, 2005
Hi,I've been creating a db application using MS Access and MSDE. Only twoof us are using the application, and the server and the app both rungreat on my laptop (1.6 GHz Pentium M, 2GB RAM, W2KPro). Only problemis when I take my laptop home, my coworker loses access to the server.We recently purchased a dedicated server to run the db on at theoffice. It's a 2.8 GHz Dual Xeon, 2GB RAM, running XPPro. We alsobought SQL Server, but I installed the Personal Edition becuase we arenot using a server OS. It's my understanding that XP can utilize bothprocessors, and the Personal Edition can use both processors as well.(On a side note, why is Enterprise Manager showing that I have 4processors - why?) In addition, I understand PE has a work-loadgovernor that cripples performance when more than 5 TSQL commands arebeing run simultaneously.I backed up the db on my laptop and restored it on our new server. Butwhen I run the exact same queries with the exact same number of rows,my queries on the new server are take 3x longer(!?). Can someoneplease offer a few suggestions for why this is happening? What can Ido to improve performance on the server machine?Please let me know if I need to supply more information.Thanks,Alex
View 15 Replies
View Related
Dec 6, 2004
In oracle you can run queries against some built in virtual table called dual. Like below:
SELECT SEQ.NEXTVAL FROM DUAL
does sql server have anything similar?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 21, 2014
Assume I built a stored proc (dbo.testproc) that will return the OUTPUT parameter @RandomInteger.
I could pass a specific value for the parameter...
EXEC dbo.testproc 7
Or I could return a value from the proc...
DECLARE @ReturnInteger
EXEC dbo.testproc @RandomInteger = @ReturnInteger OUTPUT
SELECT @ReturnInteger
But I want to do both which, if this actually worked, might look like this...
DECLARE @RandomInteger
SET @RandomInteger = 7
EXEC dbo.testproc @RandomInteger = @ReturnInteger OUTPUT
SELECT @ReturnInteger
I want to pass a specific value and return the result from the proc. Do I need to use two parameters for this?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Feb 16, 2007
I am working on a site's SQL Server 2000 database on a W2k3 machine . I went into Enterprise Manager and saw that their database resides on a named instance. I did not see the default instance listed so I registered that using windows authentication. I noticed that the default instance had a user database that had the same name as the user database on the named instance that I was to work on. I looked at the properties of the databases and saw that on both the default and named instances of SQL Server that the Data Files and Log Files for the user database point to the same location.
Is this a problem? Can anyone see any issues with this? Does this mean that someone can simply connect to the named or the default instance of the SQL Server and connect to the same database?
Kirk
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 27, 2006
Greetings,
I'm wondering if it is possible to have two independent y-axes on a single chart?
I am wanting to plot data using a hybrid bar/line chart and have the values for the vertical bars show on the left y-axis and the values for the points on the line show on the right y-axis.
I've seen this sort of thing done on other platforms before, but don't know if it is possible with SQL Reporting. We are using SQL RS 2000 by the way.
Thanks
--
Anthony
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 25, 2001
I am searching for the MS SQL equivilent for the Oracle Dual command.
select 'hello' from dual;
Jeff
jchie@vafb.com
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 13, 2000
I've heard somewhere that SQL Server supports dual languages ? Can anyone confirm this ? How do you set it up please ?
Essentially we need to run our database in Japanese. It currently runs in english.
thanks
Paul
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 17, 1999
We have a 200MHz Pentium Pro based machine, with 128MB RAM running SQL Server 6.5. Because of performance issues, we are contemplating an upgrade to a dual 200MHz Pentium Pro processor with 256MB RAM. However, the vendor we are dealing with has suggested an upgrade to a single Pentiun II/333MHz first, and if this still causes problems, then to a dual P II/333MHz.
Does anyone have any suggestions from similar upgrades that they may have undergone?
We have 72MB allocated to SQL Server.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 3, 2007
We are in process of moving to 64 bit HP servers with sql2005 standard edition. We were just wondering which is better option, to get a server with 2 dual core processor or to get a srver with just 4 processor? How does SQL2005 handle the hypertheading of dual processor?
Thanks,
Carlos
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 15, 2007
any tutorial on how to setup SQL Server in a dual redundant environment ?
thanks
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 20, 2008
I have created a C# Windows Forms application that can be run connected directly to SQL Server 2005 (publisher) for in-office users and to a SQL Express (subscriber) on a tablet PC for remote users. The server is set through configuration and the remote users sync using replication and it all works.
The issue I'm having is that I've found it necessary to install SQL Server management objects (SQLServer2005_XMO) on the clients who sit at desktops and never use replication or SMO. I believe this is because SMO has to be installed in the GAC and I can't just distribute the required dlls with my app.
Is there any way I can deploy this app to always connected users without installing SMO on their machines?
Thanks, Jamie Ide
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 17, 2008
Hi I am trying to populate a table with 2 FKs as its PK (SiteID and ProductDescID). First 1) I add in all the products whose Manfacturer and Category are supposed to appear on the site and then 2) I add in all the extra products that are needed regardless of their manufacturer or category. The problem I am having is if the product has already been added to the ProductCatTable due to its Manufacturer or Cateogry but is also in the SatForceProduct table. The can’t insert duplicate PK error is thrown. I don’t know how to do this IF NOT EXISTS statement (or what ever else may be needed) so that I can check whether a line from the Forced table needs to be added. I am not passing in any parameters and I am expecting more than 1 line to be inserted in each of the statements. Please help -- 1) Populate INSERT INTO dbo.ProductCatTable (SiteID, ProductDescID) SELECT dbo.SatSite.SiteID, dbo.ProductDesc.ProductDescID FROM dbo.SatManu INNER JOIN dbo.ProductDesc ON dbo.SatManu.Manu = dbo.ProductDesc.Manu INNER JOIN dbo.SatCats ON dbo.ProductDesc.Cat = dbo.SatCats.Cat INNER JOIN dbo.SatSite ON dbo.SatManu.SatID = dbo.SatSite.SiteID AND dbo.SatCats.SatID = dbo.SatSite.SiteID 2) Add Force Ins IF NOT EXISTS(SELECT SiteID, ProductDescID FROM ProductCatTable WHERE ????????) BEGIN INSERT INTO dbo. ProductCatTable (SiteID, ProductDescID) SELECT SiteID, ProductDescID FROM dbo.SatForceProduct END Thanks in advance J
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 12, 2004
This question may be a little complicated.
I am building a DTS Package that is moving data from our webstore (written in house) to a Warehouse Management System(WMS - Turnkey) and I've encountered a problem. both pieces of software have an orders table and an Ordered_Items table, related by the order_ID (makes sense so far). Here is the problem. The primary key on the webstore's Ordered_Items table is a single column (basically an Identity variable), while the primary key on the WMS's Ordered_Items table is a dual column primary key, between the Order_ID and the Order_LineID, so the data should be stored like:
OrderID Order_LineID
1 1
2 1
2 2
2 3
3 1
3 2
4 1
Get the Idea? So I have to create this new Order_LineID column. How can I accomplish this with a SQL statement?
Thanks!!!!!
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 17, 2007
Hi,
I am running MSSQL 2005 Standard edition on a two processor Intel Xeon 3GHz (dual-core) with 8GB RAM.
I notice in "Windows task manager CPU performance" while running a long SQL statement (takes 1.5 hours), only 1 logical (out of 4) is utilised at >70%. The remaining 3 logical processors hover around 10%
Using Performance monitor, the average read queue, write queue, and pages/sec also hovers around 25%, indicating no heavy physical disk/memory loading.
How can I set to utilise more physical/logical processor to improve the MSSQL performance ?
Thanks.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 31, 2001
Hi,
I am running SQL7 SP2 on a Compaq Proliant 5500 (NT4 Server SP6a) with dual processor.
When trying to schedule any jobs with DTSRUN I get the following error:
DTSRun.exe - Application Error
The instruction at "0x77f64d7b" referenced memory at "0x00000010". The memory could not be read.
Has anyone seen this error before ??
Regards,
Tim
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 28, 2004
I currently have a single proc server in production and want to maintain a spare server that is dual-proc.
Is there a technical problem installing a single license SQL 2000 Standard on a dual-proc server? WIll it allow it or is it actually just a legal licensing requirement?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 23, 2005
Hi,Is there a reason why we have to pay more for licensing for a differentkind of processor?Why are we not charged for the Hyperthreading on some processors also.If Oracle is really conserned about the low end business market (smalland medium), then they should drop their attitude on Dual Coreprocessors.If they start charging as if it was a normal processor, and ask thenormal price, then they would get more of this market coming in.As long as Oracle keeps on having the attitude of charging more,because Intel or some other cpu vendor decided to mprove theirprocessors because of overheating problems, I will have the attitudethat I will keep on reoccomending alternatives for Orcle like Mysql /Postgre sql / Sybase, etc to the small/medium sector.Microsoft's pricing model on double core processors suddenly soundallot better.Oracle are shooting themselves in the foot! Or am I the only personfeeling this way?Shaun O'Reilly
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 7, 2007
ok i have intel dual core i have a conflict only in playing a game black hawk down it gives me a run stop error. locks up and has to be restarted. microsoft gave me a fix but when i do the fix it causes me to get a system dump error on the game. i can update my web site do anything else let daughter play her games or do her school work and nothing happens. i was told i needed to set up the dual core so that my programs dont conflict i am a moron when it comes to computers is there a fix for this or i am i just going to have to go back to single core processor for now thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 12, 2006
We are trying to setup a system to system failover cluster using twonodes (x346) which each have a single hba running to seperatecontrollers on the DS400.For full redundnancy, IBM recommends dual path from each node but wedont need that. The current setup has two completly seperate paths. hbaon node 1 to controller A on DS400 and hba on node 2 to controller B.If i take a controller offline, failover works fine to jumo to othercontroller and throw all resources to it's node but if i shutdown anode- the cluster loses all attached storage and DS400 is unaware toswitch ownership to other controller.Is there a way to us mscs without dual path from each node?anotherwords... if either node or controller fails on a single path, wewant the other path to become active.our main goal is to use sql server 2005 clustering on the cluster.everything checks out perfect if i only use one controller on the DS400for both nodes but this brings us back to another single point offailure.I saw that Qlogic has MPIO drivers on thir website for the DS400 but itseems as though they are for 32bit systems and the install errors outwith:C:Driversmpio1.0.8.4 (w32)>install.exe -iPre-Installing the Multi-Path Adapter Filter...SuccessInstalling the Multi-Path Bus Driver...Failure. Error code (0xe0000235)configuration:2 X IBM x346 w/ single QLogic 2340 HBAs running win2k3 64bit EnterpriseDS400 w/ dual controllers
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 27, 2008
hi all,
I was under the impression that SQL Server 2005 can install on dual processor, quad core Intel machines.
Here's what we have: Intel Quad Core Xeon (E7340) @ 2.4Ghz. (8 way)
Has anyone encountered any issues w/ this setup -- particularly on this Intel CPU version?
thank you,
Cosmin
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 22, 2007
We are using an IBM Xeon server with 4 GB RAM with windows 2000 server and MS Sql server 2005.
More frequently our server responce time is very slow, although the cpu utilization is between 7 - 10 %. we can not able to run even notepad on the server. we observed that the memory occupaid by the sqlserver prog is high. If we restart the server then it will return to normal level. But we do not want restart the server frequently.
Kindly provide me suitale solution.
Srinath
DBA
Reid & Taylor
Mysore, India
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 22, 2007
We are using an IBM Xeon server with Sevrer 2000 and sql server 2005 with 4B RAM.
We noticed that the responce time of the server is very slow. During this time the memory occupancy by the sqlserver is very high. Althouh the cpu utilization is very low (7-10%) we are unable to run even notepad on the server. In some other situations the cpu utilization will be 100% (for more than one hour) during this time also the sql server occupaies more memory. If we reatarts the server then the problem will be fixed, but we do not want to restart the server very frequently.
Kindly provide us a suitable solution
Srinath R
DBA
Reid & Taylor
Mysore. India
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 8, 2007
Hi,
we work with the Reporting Services of the Itanium Edition of SQL Server 2005. With some reports (only some) we have the problem that
very long time is needed for the processing of the report. I checked the ExecutionLog table in my Reportserver database and detected that
values in the column TimeDataRetrieval (TDR) or pretty slow, but them in the column TimeProcessing (TP) are very high.
Report1: TDR = 8304ms TP = 34377ms .
In other (most) reports the values are completely different
Report2: TDR 8336ms TP = 233ms
Now the most interesting thing: When I execute the same report on our test server which is a xeon machine (same data volume, no user workload)
I get the following results:
Report1: TDR = 5244ms TP = 11731ms
Report2: TDR = 4750ms TP = 163
The differences in TimeDataRetrieval (TDR) should be ok, because the machine is used by over 700 people
and so the response times of the Analysis Server database could differ.
Report1 and 2 do not differ too much in complexity. A few groupings, parameters and so on.
The Itanium machine is a 2 way dual core system with 16 Gigabyte RAM.
The Xeon machine is a 2 way xeon system with 8 Gigabyte RAM (32bit processors).
What is going on there? How could I optimize the TimeProcessing of Report1 on the Itanium machine? Which performance counters or tools should I use to go
deeper finding out where the problem is?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 20, 2007
My server is a dual AMD x64 2.19 GHz with 8 GB RAM running under Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition with service pack 1 installed. We have SQL 2000 32-bit Enterprise installed in the default instance. AWE is enabled using Dynamically configured SQL Server memory with 6215 MB minimum memory and 6656 maximum memory settings.
I have now installed, side-by-side, SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Edition in a separate named instance. Everything is running fine but I believe SQL Server2005 could run faster and need to ensure I am giving it plenty of resources. I realize AWE is not needed with SQL Server 2005 and I have seen suggestions to grant the SQL Server account the 'lock pages in memory' rights. This box only runs the SQL 2000 and SQL 2005 server databases and I would like to ensure, if possible, that each is splitting the available memory equally, at least until we can retire SQL Server 2000 next year. Any suggestions?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Aug 10, 2007
Hi,
We have an old machine which holds SQL server 2000 database. We need to migrate a whole database to a new machine which has SQL server 2005.
When we tried to move whole database using Import and Export Wizard, only tables can be selected to import/export. However we want to import/export the whole database, including tables, stored procedure, view, etc. Which tool should we use?
Thanks.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 10, 2007
Hi,
We have an old machine which holds SQL server 2000 database. We need to migrate a whole database to a new machine which has SQL server 2005.
When we tried to move whole database using Import and Export Wizard, only tables can be selected to import/export. However we want to import/export the whole database, including tables, stored procedure, view, etc. Which tool should we use?
Thanks.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 6, 2007
Hi,
When I am trying to access SQL Server 2000 database from another machine i got this error
Server: MSg 17, Level 16, State 1 [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][DBNETLIB]SQL Server does not exist or access denied
but I could access the database on same server and in that server i could access other databases in different server.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2008
When I proposed start to use SQL Server 2005 for new VS 2005 web sites, one of my co-workers responded that
we will update the old SQL Server 2000 databases to SQL Server 2005 when we are ready to use 2005 SQL Server.
Questions:
1. Any expected problems to upgrade old 2000 databases to new 2005 SQL Server?
2. I have installed both 2005/Management Studio Express and 2000/Enterprise Manager in my PC. Any expected
problems when running both 2000 and 2005 SQL Server at the same database server?
3. What is the best configuration for running SQL Server 2005 when we have old 2000 databases? Upgade or not upgrade?
TIA,
Jeffrey
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 20, 2007
I am getteing
need help
Query analyzer error Unable to connect server local Msg17, level 16,state 1
ODBC SQL server driver [DBNETLIB]SQL server does not exist
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 3, 2008
Hi,
I am having a problem connecting my .net applications from the application server to the database server. When I run the application from my windows xp (sp2) box it works fine. When I try to connect via SQL Management Studio to the database server from the application server I get the same error.
Here is the error:
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections. (provider: Named Pipes Provider, error: 40 - Could not open a connection to SQL Server)
Here is the Environment:
App Server:
Windows Server 2003 Standard Edition
Inside Company's Firewall/ Network
Database Server:
Windows Server 2000 Advanced Edition
SQL Server 2000 SP4
Remote Connections to the Server is checked
Enable Protocols: Named Pipes & TCP/IP
TCP/IP Port: 1402 (I don't know why it isn't the default of 1433)
The db server is sitting out side the Company's firewall (don't ask me why). I can access it fine from inside the firewall on my XP box but not from windows server 2003. There is a web server outside the our network that also connects to the db server with no problem and that is running Windows Server 2003 Web Edition.
I can ping the db server from the app server using the IP address.
I tried using the IP address and the port 1402 in my connection string but that didn't work from any machine (XP and Server).
I imagine the issue is somehow related to the company's firewall but why would it only block Windows Server 2003 and not XP?
What do I tell the network admin to change?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Oran
View 4 Replies
View Related
