Dumb Data Storage Question

Dec 13, 2006

Hello,
 So, here's my dumb question; if I wanted to store some *.gif images in some database (SQL2K possibly 2K5) field and wanted to pull the information from that to display on the web form, am I actually storing the image in the database or am I storing the location of the image in the database?
I ask this because I was under the impression that the location to the image file is what was being stored but another person was saying that it was the actual image. I guess I'm confused...
 
Thanks in advance....
 

View 4 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Dumb Question: Best Practices To Validate Data Columns

Aug 15, 2007

[This is one of those cases where I think I know the answer, but I hope I'm wrong!]

I have a data flow which is processing data from the XML Source. There are 16 outputs from the XML Source. I have to perform a variety of validations on these outputs: things like "column 1 is required if column 2 has value 'a' or 'b'", or "column 1 or column 2 may be present, but not both".

For lookups and such, I use the Lookup component and its error output, both to redirect rows that fail the lookup, and to capture the data, column number and error code.

But, how do I do the same for "normal" validations?

If I have to use the Conditional Split transform, then I'll have to have one output per validation, and use a Union All to combine the rows again for output to an error file. This will also cost an extra "Derived Column" transform per output, in order to get a column number and possible error code per failed validation.


Worse, it's a pain to have to maintain all the columns in such a large "Union All"!

If I had the time, I might write a "Conditional Error" transform. It might be fun. But I have to be done by the end of this month, and don't even have time to create the UI for evaluating expressions!

Any tips or tricks or pointers to such would be very welcome.

View 9 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: Distinct Storage Tier Of Remote BLOB Storage (RBS)

Oct 27, 2014

How to implement distinct storage tiers on SQL Remote BLOB Storage (RBS)?

I want to use this SQL Feature to move files(images, videos, pdf files) from a database to a distinct database dedicated to RBS. Then I want to have several storage tiers, where objects will be saved and moved according access frequency. Old data will be arquived in cheap storage, but it must be always accessible if needed.

Description:
- 1st and main tier: new and frequently accessed objects stored in high performance storage;
- 2nd tier: automatically move older or less accessed objects to an inexpensive and different storage tier;
- in all cases, all objects must be accessible to all users, but accessing to archived objects(2nd tier) will be much slower;

View 0 Replies View Related

How Many Data Can Storage Into Sql Ce

Mar 16, 2007

Hi,

i want to know how many data can storage into sql server compact edition. I've got a db into a pocket pc that has a table with about 2000 records inside; are they too records?

View 5 Replies View Related

Un Limited Data Storage

Aug 29, 2005

hi all,
I have a field which name is Information
and it type is Varchar (8000),but some time data access than 8000 character, my client told me,make this field to store Unlimited data.
So how can i achive this task, i m using VS 2003 (ASP.NET with VB.NET) with SQL 2000.
Thanks
Shally

View 2 Replies View Related

XML Data Type Storage

Nov 22, 2006

Hi All,As per BOL, XML data type can store up 2 GB of data.My question is when a row is inserted in a table, for its xml column,2GB of space will be resered.In other words, how xml is internally stored. Is storage allocation issimilar to varchar(max) data type?Thanks in advance for everything.

View 1 Replies View Related

Storage For Data And Logs

Apr 2, 2007

I am planning on doing database mirroring using two (2) servers for each instance and a SAN to store the data and log files for both the primary server and mirrored server. How do I arrange the SAN 4 Physical Drives?
My options are:
· 2 Raid 1 Mirrors giving 250 GB to each SQL engine €“ This though has both the transaction logs and data on the same physical drive even if we split it up further into logical drives
· A Raid 10 - The transaction logs and data can be on separate drives
· A Raid 5 using the 4 Drives. (How SQL will see these drives I€™m not sure when it€™s 2 SQL engines)
· Or I could get a 5th drive and have a mirror set for transaction logs and a RAID 5 configured for the data.

View 3 Replies View Related

Storage Of Varying Data Types In SQL

Jun 2, 2001

re: [Windows 2000 SP1, SQL Server 7.0 SP2]

I am developing an online web-based address book for multiple users. There are STANDARD FIELDS and CUSTOM FIELDS.

Standard fields include: Name,Street,City,State,Zip.
Custom fields are those defined by a specific user. For example:

User-A Custom fields:
Interest Rate <real>
Loan Amount <currency>
Start date <date>

User-B Custom fields:
Blood type <char 3>
Date of birth <date>
Referred by <varchar 50>

Different users can have different custom fields in their address book. As you can see, while the standard fields for each user can be

stored in a single table. However, I have several methods by which I can store the CUSTOM fields.

------------------------------------------------
Method 1: Create 2 separate tables called CustomField and CustomValue:

CustomField has fields:
FieldID <int>
FieldName <varchar 25>
UserID <int>

CustomValue has fields:
ValueID <int>
Value <varchar 50>
FieldID <int>

------------------------------------------------
Method 2: Create a separate Field and multiple Value tables for each data type:
CustomField, CustomCharValue, CustomIntValue, CustomMoneyValue, etc...

CustomField has fields:
FieldID <int>
FieldName <varchar 25>
FieldType <smallint> (determines which TABLE, below, contains the data)
UserID <int>

CustomCharValue
CharValueID <int>
IntValue <Varchar 50>
FieldID <int>

CustomIntValue
IntValueID <int>
IntValue <int>
FieldID <int>

etc....etc...


The structures of those tables would be similar to Method 1, but the data would be segregated based on their data type.

--------------------------------------------------

I'm thinking that while Method 1 will be easier to implement, Method 2 may offer me better performance if coded correctly. I'm going

to assume that I'll have at least 1-5 million records to work with over the course of my first year and I will need the ability to sort

records based on values in the custom fields as well.

My first question is: Which method should I be considering and is there an alternative or hybrid that I should be considering?

My second question is: What statements should I use in my stored procedure that will enable me to retrieve a list of USERID, CustomFieldIDs and their values as one resulting table that I can query at will and with solid performance?

Gregory
email: sqlGuy@clubtel.com

View 1 Replies View Related

Indexing And Physical Storage Of Data

Aug 28, 2007

1> How is the data stored physically when there is now primary key as well as any index defined in the table......?

2> How is the data stored physically when there is just a primary key defined in one of the column of the table? No INDEX defined.




Thanks,
Rahul Jha

View 1 Replies View Related

Storage Of Text Data Types

Jan 2, 2014

I trying to fully understand when to use different data types in sql server.I want to know what Microdoft means when they say"Varchar is the actual length of the data entered plus 2 bytes".example e.g. what would the storage of varchar (50) be?

View 7 Replies View Related

Strategy For Data Storage/searching

Dec 16, 2007

Hello there,

Don't know if this is the right forum to be asking this, but I'll give it a try...

I'm relativelly a beginner in SQL Server and T-SQL in general. The problem I'm trying to solve is the following:

The big picture is that I have data coming from different data sources which I need to store on a database for later reference. Each data source might have a different set of measurements. For example, data source 1 might log Pressure and Humidity while data source 2 logs Pressure and Temperature. Once the data is present on the DB, the users can go ahead and retrieve data for a given [datasource/measurement/time interval] to generate reports or charts.

My implementation so far consists of two tables: series_info and series_data. series_info holds general information for a given series of measurements for a given data source (Pressure for data source 1, Pressure for data source 2, Humidity for data source 1 and Temperature for data source 2, in our example). Each series has a bigint index as primary key.

The table series_data contains all data relative to the series from series_info. Each piece of data has a bigint as a primary key, an associate time (which is always crescent) and a foreign key to the series it represents (in series_info).

Alright, everything is cool so far. However, whenever a user wants to retrieve data for given [data source/measurement/time interval], this takes very long, since all data is interposed in series_data and for every search it's necessary to find where the desired data actually lies.

One obvious solution for this would be to dynamically create a new table to hold the data for each series, but that would just make my database disorganized, since there would be thousands and thousands of tables.

Another thing that comes to my mind is to create a table with information of where lies the data for a given [data source / measurement] for given dates. So when the user requested data for a given [data source/measurement] between, say, january and february, we would first look at this intermediate table and find out that the data lies between indexes 1000 and 2000 on the series_data table, so the next SELECT command to series_data would already contain a restriction like WHERE index>=1000 and index<=2000. This should probably improve the speed of retrieval.

What do you guys (or girls) think? Maybe there's simply a classical solution for such a case.


Thanks in advance!

View 6 Replies View Related

SQL Express 2005 Data Storage Limitation

Sep 5, 2007

Hello,
I am designing a program for work with SQL Server express 2005. But I don't know what is the data storage limit in this version of SQL Server.
What i want is storing about 30000 records in a table of the database.
Hasn't SQL Server express 2005 any problem or restrictions for storing the data?
Please advice in this regards,
Thank you,
Mona 
 

View 3 Replies View Related

Differant Language OS And Data Storage In SQL Server

Oct 11, 2001

Dear Friends,

I am using SQL server 7 with ASP. I have two working environment means one is korean and second it english.
- one Korean OS server have SQL server 7.0 and it is my database server
- second Korean OS server is only webserver
- English OS is win2k and it is only Web server.


1) When i used both Korean server as my webserver + database server then there is no problem to add Korean Data to SQL server On korean OS.

2) But when I try to user English OS server as my webserver and Korean Os server as my database server then I am not able to store Korean Data in Database server insted of it stored some mis/junk/acssi characters in database.

-- I allready try with Korean version of MDAC of English os
-- I also try with OEM feature in SQL server client network utility
-- When I am use CODEPAGE in my .ASP page then data storage work fine .. but at the time of getting it back there is problem.



If u need any more information about problem then let me know.

So please help me in this regards.

Thanx in advance
Anis Vora
Partner
Global SoftWeb Solutions
www.globalsoftweb.com

View 1 Replies View Related

MSSQL: Storage Of Varying Data Types

Jun 2, 2001

I am developing an online web-based address book for multiple users. There are STANDARD FIELDS and CUSTOM FIELDS.

Standard fields include: Name,Street,City,State,Zip.
Custom fields are those defined by a specific user. For example:

User-A Custom fields:
Interest Rate <real>
Loan Amount <currency>
Start date <date>

User-B Custom fields:
Blood type <char 3>
Date of birth <date>
Referred by <varchar 50>

Different users can have different custom fields in their address book. As you can see, while the standard fields for each user can be

stored in a single table. However, I have several methods by which I can store the CUSTOM fields.

------------------------------------------------
Method 1: Create 2 separate tables called CustomField and CustomValue:

CustomField has fields:
FieldID <int>
FieldName <varchar 25>
UserID <int>

CustomValue has fields:
ValueID <int>
Value <varchar 50>
FieldID <int>

------------------------------------------------
Method 2: Create a separate Field and multiple Value tables for each data type:
CustomField, CustomCharValue, CustomIntValue, CustomMoneyValue, etc...

CustomField has fields:
FieldID <int>
FieldName <varchar 25>
FieldType <smallint> (determines which TABLE, below, contains the data)
UserID <int>

CustomCharValue
CharValueID <int>
IntValue <Varchar 50>
FieldID <int>

CustomIntValue
IntValueID <int>
IntValue <int>
FieldID <int>

etc....etc...


The structures of those tables would be similar to Method 1, but the data would be segregated based on their data type.

--------------------------------------------------

I'm thinking that while Method 1 will be easier to implement, Method 2 may offer me better performance if coded correctly. I'm going

to assume that I'll have at least 1-5 million records to work with over the course of my first year and I will need the ability to sort

records based on values in the custom fields as well.

My first question is: Which method should I be considering and is there an alternative or hybrid that I should be considering?

My second question is: What statements should I use in my stored procedure that will enable me to
retrieve a list of USERID, CustomFieldIDs and their values as one resulting table that I can query at will and with solid performance?

Gregory
email: sqlGuy@clubtel.com

View 1 Replies View Related

Can't Install IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Server On Windows 2003 X64 Storage Server, How Can I Fix The Pkg?

Jan 14, 2008

I am a Windows developer for the IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Server (TSMS) product.
Our product installation is built with InstallShield and uses the Windows Installer.

On a new installation of Windows 2003 x64 Storage Server R2, at a customer's site, the TSMS product fails to install.
The install of the OS has version 3.01.400.3959 of the Windows Installer and I see no newer version that installs.

Part of our product is 32 bit (console) and another part is x64 (server).
When installing I can see that the install's default is being redirected/reset to C:Program Files (x86)TivoliTSM after it is explicitly set by a custom action to ..Program Files.. . I further observe that our custom actions to write 64 bit registry entries are being refused.

REGSAM samMask = KEY_ALL_ACCESS;
if ( regIsWow64Process () ) samMask = samMask | KEY_WOW64_64KEY;
lStatus = RegCreateKeyEx( hLocalConnectKeyRoot,
szSubkey,
0L,
NULL,
REG_OPTION_NON_VOLATILE,
samMask,
NULL,
hKey,
&dw ) ;
The above fails to create the key.

We have tried four versions of our TSMS spanning many changes but the install acts the same.
This does not happen on any other Windows OS we test on but we do not test on Windows 2003 Storage Server R2 being that it is an OEM product. We did test on Windows server 2003 R2 x64 and do not see this problem.

Do you have any suggestions on how to tackle this problem?
I have full installation traces but can only see that the registry work is being refused. I can't see why.

View 1 Replies View Related

Design Data Storage For Feature Similar To Facebook Groups

Mar 13, 2008

Ok so facebook groups have 100,000's of members. Members can be part of an unlimited number of groups, and a group can have an unlimited number of members.

Comma Deliniated String seems absurd. Many-2-Many Database relationship seems like it won't scale well t the 10's of thousands and 100's of thousands of members (especially if you have 1000-5000 groups). A table for each group would work but thats a bit over the top in my opinion. XML file doesn't seem to be any better than the above options.

I am no database guru, but I can't figure out a scalable method of doing this, be it with or without a database. I need something that can support 10 groups that have 20 members each OR 1000 groups with 100,000 members each.

Any help, suggestions, or kicked in the right direction would be most appreciated.

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL 2000 DTS Package Data Storage -- What Table(s) Is This Information Stored In?

Aug 22, 2007

I need to generate a report of DTS package results, i. e. succeed, fail, error, etc. What tables is information of this type stored for SQL 2000?

winniemax

View 3 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: Manage Max Table Storage Space In Case Of Excess Data (size In GB)

Apr 23, 2015

I am using sql server 2008 r2 on my end. I have created a database named testDB. I have a lot of tables with some log tables in this. some tables have contain lack of records in log table.

So my purpose is that I want to fix the table size of those tables(log tables) and want to move records in other database table placed on another location. So my database has no problem.

is there any way to make such above steps which I want for my database?

Is there already built any such functionality in sql server?

View 2 Replies View Related

Not So Dumb SQL OR Question

Jun 10, 2008

How does OR work when mixed with AND.  This I know is elementary but my loss of SQL intellect is approaching total eclipse.
WHERE (Name LIKE @Kwrd0) OR ( Description LIKE '%' + @Kwrd0 + ' ' + @Kwrd1 + '%' ) OR (Keywords LIKE '%' + @Kwrd0 + '%') AND ((@Kwrd1 IS NULL OR Keywords LIKE '%' + @Kwrd1 + '%')  AND (@Kwrd2 IS NULL OR Keywords LIKE '%' + @Kwrd2 + '%') AND (@Kwrd3 IS NULL OR Keywords LIKE '%' + @Kwrd3 + '%')AND (@Kwrd4 IS NULL OR Keywords LIKE '%' + @Kwrd4 + '%')AND (Enabled = 1) AND (Display = 1) AND (Rank < 20))ORDER BY L_Rank
It qualifies on the first two words and ignores the rest of the statement.  Can OR and AND's be mixed?  The potential input is up to five words.
Thank you

View 6 Replies View Related

Dumb Question

Jun 10, 2005

Hi all,
I have a question. I have a database which is really big. I got into the enterprise manager and right click on the database and select property, I saw the
the size:7000MB and space available is 6700MB. Does that mean when the database initially created, it allocated the storage space is around 7GB and now even I delete some data in the database, it will not shrink the database size, it only makes the available space bigger? Is there any way I shrink the database size without destroy any data?

Thanks!
Betty

View 10 Replies View Related

Dumb SQL 6.5 Question....

Sep 3, 2004

I have a mixed environment of mostly SQL 2000 server with a few (3?) SQL 6.5 servers (the ? is there because every now and again, I find a new, undocumented server hiding behind a firewall that some developer just happens to be having an issue with).

Can I install SQL 6.5 client tools alongside SQL 2000 client tools on the same server?

Regards,

hmscott

View 1 Replies View Related

Dumb Question

Sep 29, 2007

Sorry about this. But I've worked primarily in access for years.Does SQL Server have a boolean or a yes/no data type for its table columns?Thanks in advance,Bill

View 2 Replies View Related

A Really DUMB Question...

Jul 20, 2005

I have 4 tables (AA,MAIN,CC,DD)Everything that is not in AA but is in MAIN I want put into CCEverything that is not in MAIN but is in AA I want put into DDAdd everything in DD to MAINClear AA CC and DDThanks in advance

View 3 Replies View Related

Dumb Question

Dec 13, 2006

Just bought a new computer, and want to install vb express. There is an icon in my system tray for Microsoft SQL Server Service Manager ver. 8.00.2039. Does this mean that I won't have to install SQL Server Express? I can't find anything in the Add/Remove programs that shows any version of SQL Server that was pre-installed.

thanks

richard

View 1 Replies View Related

Dumb Question

Feb 14, 2008

Hi everyone, I have a dumb question. I want to import some MS Access tables into SQL Server 2005 Express... there is supposed to be an import wizard in the binn directory, but it doesn't seem to be there... is this wizard only part of the full blown SQL Server 2005 package? I've searched through the SQL docs, but can't make heads or tails of it.

Thanks,
Noob

View 6 Replies View Related

Dumb Question

Jan 15, 2007

Simple question from a simpleton. I'm working through Microsoft Press SQL Server 2005 Reporting Services Step by Step. It references a database rs2005sbsDW, which as far as I can tell was not included with either the sample databases on the SQL Server (standard edition) install disk or the Step by Step book. Where the heck is it? What am I missing.

Trying to reinstall the sample databases from the SQL Server install disk's tells me I have everything installed already.

Thanks in advance.

View 3 Replies View Related

Dumb Question

Aug 7, 2007

I have a simple flow that loads a data table from some flat files. It works properly but I can't figure out how to add only rows that exist (so I won't get an error from the duplicate ID). I added a lookup that redirects records that don't match any ID, but when I run it I get a timeout error (?). It seems to pick up the right # of records to add, but when it gets to the SQL Server Destination it seems to generate a timeout.



SSIS package "ImportAL3.dtsx" starting.
Information: 0x4004300A at Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: Validation phase is beginning.
Warning: 0x802092A7 at Data Flow Task, SQL Server Destination [872]: Truncation may occur due to inserting data from data flow column "SampleID" with a length of 4000 to database column "SampleID" with a length of 10.
Warning: 0x800470D8 at Data Flow Task, Derived Column [1446]: The result string for expression "TRIM([Column 17]) + REPLICATE(" ",10 - LEN(TRIM([Column 17])))" may be truncated if it exceeds the maximum length of 4000 characters. The expression could have a result value that exceeds the maximum size of a DT_WSTR.
Warning: 0x800470D8 at Data Flow Task, Derived Column [1446]: The result string for expression "TRIM([Column 2]) + REPLICATE(" ",25 - LEN(TRIM([Column 2])))" may be truncated if it exceeds the maximum length of 4000 characters. The expression could have a result value that exceeds the maximum size of a DT_WSTR.
Information: 0x4004300A at Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: Validation phase is beginning.
Warning: 0x802092A7 at Data Flow Task, SQL Server Destination [872]: Truncation may occur due to inserting data from data flow column "SampleID" with a length of 4000 to database column "SampleID" with a length of 10.
Warning: 0x800470D8 at Data Flow Task, Derived Column [1446]: The result string for expression "TRIM([Column 17]) + REPLICATE(" ",10 - LEN(TRIM([Column 17])))" may be truncated if it exceeds the maximum length of 4000 characters. The expression could have a result value that exceeds the maximum size of a DT_WSTR.
Warning: 0x800470D8 at Data Flow Task, Derived Column [1446]: The result string for expression "TRIM([Column 2]) + REPLICATE(" ",25 - LEN(TRIM([Column 2])))" may be truncated if it exceeds the maximum length of 4000 characters. The expression could have a result value that exceeds the maximum size of a DT_WSTR.
Information: 0x40043006 at Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: Prepare for Execute phase is beginning.
Information: 0x40043007 at Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: Pre-Execute phase is beginning.
Information: 0x402090DC at Data Flow Task, Flat File Source [100]: The processing of file "C: empLW002785.AL3" has started.
Warning: 0x800470D8 at Data Flow Task, Derived Column [1446]: The result string for expression "TRIM([Column 17]) + REPLICATE(" ",10 - LEN(TRIM([Column 17])))" may be truncated if it exceeds the maximum length of 4000 characters. The expression could have a result value that exceeds the maximum size of a DT_WSTR.
Warning: 0x800470D8 at Data Flow Task, Derived Column [1446]: The result string for expression "TRIM([Column 2]) + REPLICATE(" ",25 - LEN(TRIM([Column 2])))" may be truncated if it exceeds the maximum length of 4000 characters. The expression could have a result value that exceeds the maximum size of a DT_WSTR.
Information: 0x400490F4 at Data Flow Task, LookupGrade [2832]: component "LookupGrade" (2832) has cached 11 rows.
Information: 0x400490F4 at Data Flow Task, LookupTestID [5608]: component "LookupTestID" (5608) has cached 0 rows.
Error: 0xC0202009 at Data Flow Task, SQL Server Destination [872]: An OLE DB error has occurred. Error code: 0x80040E14.
An OLE DB record is available. Source: "Microsoft SQL Native Client" Hresult: 0x80040E14 Description: "Cannot fetch a row from OLE DB provider "BULK" for linked server "(null)".".
An OLE DB record is available. Source: "Microsoft SQL Native Client" Hresult: 0x80040E14 Description: "The OLE DB provider "BULK" for linked server "(null)" reported an error. The provider did not give any information about the error.".
An OLE DB record is available. Source: "Microsoft SQL Native Client" Hresult: 0x80040E14 Description: "Reading from DTS buffer timed out.".
Information: 0x4004300C at Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: Execute phase is beginning.
Information: 0x402090DE at Data Flow Task, Flat File Source [100]: The total number of data rows processed for file "C: empLW002785.AL3" is 1.
Information: 0x402090DD at Data Flow Task, Flat File Source [100]: The processing of file "C: empLW002785.AL3" has ended.
Information: 0x402090DC at Data Flow Task, Flat File Source [100]: The processing of file "C: empLW002786.AL3" has started.
Information: 0x402090DE at Data Flow Task, Flat File Source [100]: The total number of data rows processed for file "C: empLW002786.AL3" is 1.
Information: 0x402090DD at Data Flow Task, Flat File Source [100]: The processing of file "C: empLW002786.AL3" has ended.
Information: 0x402090DC at Data Flow Task, Flat File Source [100]: The processing of file "C: empLW002787.AL3" has started.
Information: 0x402090DE at Data Flow Task, Flat File Source [100]: The total number of data rows processed for file "C: empLW002787.AL3" is 1.
Information: 0x402090DD at Data Flow Task, Flat File Source [100]: The processing of file "C: empLW002787.AL3" has ended.
Information: 0x402090DC at Data Flow Task, Flat File Source [100]: The processing of file "C: empLW002788.AL3" has started.
Information: 0x402090DE at Data Flow Task, Flat File Source [100]: The total number of data rows processed for file "C: empLW002788.AL3" is 1.
Information: 0x402090DD at Data Flow Task, Flat File Source [100]: The processing of file "C: empLW002788.AL3" has ended.
Information: 0x402090DC at Data Flow Task, Flat File Source [100]: The processing of file "C: empLW002789.AL3" has started.
Information: 0x402090DE at Data Flow Task, Flat File Source [100]: The total number of data rows processed for file "C: empLW002789.AL3" is 1.
Information: 0x402090DD at Data Flow Task, Flat File Source [100]: The processing of file "C: empLW002789.AL3" has ended.
Information: 0x402090DC at Data Flow Task, Flat File Source [100]: The processing of file "C: empLW002790.AL3" has started.
Information: 0x402090DE at Data Flow Task, Flat File Source [100]: The total number of data rows processed for file "C: empLW002790.AL3" is 1.
Information: 0x402090DD at Data Flow Task, Flat File Source [100]: The processing of file "C: empLW002790.AL3" has ended.
Information: 0x40043008 at Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: Post Execute phase is beginning.
Information: 0x40043009 at Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: Cleanup phase is beginning.
Information: 0x4004300B at Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: "component "SQL Server Destination" (872)" wrote 6 rows.
Warning: 0x80019002 at Data Flow Task: The Execution method succeeded, but the number of errors raised (1) reached the maximum allowed (1); resulting in failure. This occurs when the number of errors reaches the number specified in MaximumErrorCount. Change the MaximumErrorCount or fix the errors.
Task failed: Data Flow Task
Warning: 0x80019002 at ImportAL3: The Execution method succeeded, but the number of errors raised (1) reached the maximum allowed (1); resulting in failure. This occurs when the number of errors reaches the number specified in MaximumErrorCount. Change the MaximumErrorCount or fix the errors.
SSIS package "ImportAL3.dtsx" finished: Failure.

View 5 Replies View Related

Dumb Question SQL Server 7.0

Sep 17, 1999

Hi !

I'm new to SQL-server 7.0

If I install the Desktop Edition on a Nt-workstation, can I then fully administer 6.5 installations of SQL-server. Now I have both SQL-server 6.5 and the SQL-server 7.0 Enterprise Edition but can't access my 6.5 databases because the SQL-DMO verstion is to low.

How does it all work ?

Regards
Joey

View 6 Replies View Related

Really Easy/dumb SQL Question...

Jun 21, 2004

Pardon me, my SQL knowledge is not advanced enough to know how to do this, though I'm sure it's pretty simple:

Let's say I have a table called products, with fields like SKU, name, price. And let's say I have a temporary table with changes to be made (updates) to the current products.. same fields, SKU, name, price. I basically would like to be able to update currently existing entries in the products table, with the changes shown in the temporary table. Example:

PRODUCTS:
T231,Crazy Stick,4.99
023J87,Basketball Hoop,12.99
GB-572,CD Rack,8.99

TEMP. TABLE:
GB-572,Wooden CD Rack,8.99
T231,Crazy Stick,3.95

So I'd like to just merge the products in temp table w/ the ones in products. How can I do this?

Thanks!

View 4 Replies View Related

Dumb Question - Significance Of N

Oct 12, 2004

I know this is a stupid question, but I just can't find the proper explanation. I often see the letter N preceding a parameter when executing a stored procedure (ie. exec sp_xxx @parm = N'test'). What is the significance of the N and when should it be used?

Thanks,
Roby2222

View 4 Replies View Related

Dumb Question - Index.

Jun 6, 2008

If I am running a cross-tab query on a table that has 15000 records in it to check specific records (It basically is running a table-valued function about 10,000 times

Here's the actual query

Select a.EmployeeID,b.*
from #TmpActiveEmployeesWSeverance a
cross apply
dbo.fn_Severance_AccountItemsTableBULKRUN(a.EmployeeID,a.BenefitTypeID,null,null,null,null,null) b


Within that function there is a sub-query on a table that is


Select col3
from T_Mytable a
where col1 = @EmployeeID
and Col2 = @BenefitTypeID


I can not figure out why there not ANY performance increase in having a non-clusterd index on T_Mytable(EmployeeID,BenefitTypeID)

Shouldn't Sql Reference this index when determining the plan execution, or is it because the record count is only about 10,000 records, so there is no need for sql to use the index?

Thanks for the clarification, I just would like to know why this is.

View 3 Replies View Related

Very Dumb Beginner Question

Jun 27, 2007

I need to develop a web-based (intranet) database application. Would SQL be the best product for the data storage? And would it be available "real time" for statewide input? (In other words, not needing replication).



Thanks in advance for your patience and assistance.

View 4 Replies View Related

Dumb 2000 - 2005 Question

Feb 20, 2006

OK, stupid but i've got to ask!

will a SQL 2005 backup file restore to a SQL 2000 server?

cheers
Fatherjack

View 2 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved