Two simple questions:
1. Im insterting records in a recently created EDB databse for WM 5.0, but only 16 records can be witten, does any body knows where is the property to accept more than only 16 records???
2. is there ann RAPI for manage EDB. because my aplication use a lot the RAPI that comes for CEDB, but what about EDB??? does it exist?
I need to do synchronization My PDA's database with Desktop Computer's database manually.
M woking with VB.Net Compact framework... So plz Give me some intial code frm which i can start My Project....
Xcept RAPI if is there any thing thn POST BACK me ???
THNX & REGARDS
AMIT MASTER
Hi,
I'm trying to migrate to VS2005 and prepare for future Windows Mobile releases. My app uses MFC, CCeDBDatabase, and RAPI from the desktop to sync with the device version of the app. Works great now, but I'm worried about how many different ways it will be broken in the future .
My questions - first, are we pretty certain that CEDB will NOT be supported after WM5? Next, is there, or will there be, a CCeDBDatabase class for EDB? VS2005 seems to know nothing about CCeDBDatabase. What should I be doing with the CCeDBDatabase; do I need to re-write everything using only API calls? Also, there is no RAPI for EDB, is this correct? If so how can I switch to EDB and still communicate/sync with the desktop using RAPI? As always, any advice is greatly appreciated, thanks!
Mike B.
My PC app uses RAPI to install files to a CEDB database on Windows Mobile devices.
Works for PPC 2002, 2003 devices, ActiveSync v3.8 and 4.1
On Windows Mobile 5.0 devices with AS 4.1, RAPI fails on CeMountDBVol with an ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER.
What needs to be done to correct this? I have read about RAPI Security policy, but this case doesn't seem to apply.
I am loading RAPI DLL dynamically.
ex:
bResult = (*pCeMountDBVol)(pDBguid, // guid of mount
DBVolumeFullName, // full path and name of database volume
OPEN_ALWAYS)); // flags
I didn't think that there were security restrictions when mounting your own database volumes.
I have a windows forms application that runs on my PC that populates a SQL Server Compact 2005 database and then transfers that .sdf file to my mobile device. The communication between the mobile device and PC is done using the Desktop RAPI class from OpenNetCF (http://www.opennetcf.com/FreeSoftware/DesktopCommunication/tabid/90/Default.aspx)
Anyway, I was previously using SQL Server Mobile 2005 and my populated .sdf was around 1.7 MB and I could transfer it to my mobile device in a minute. Once I switched to SQL Server Compact 2005, the transfer process began taking 3 minutes with a 1.5 MB .sdf file. The SSCE also got bloated more easily so I added in the Compact operation each time after I fully populate the SDF to keep the file size at 1.5 MB, but even then it still takes 3 minutes.
I've done a few tests where I simply switch between the two database versions and that simple switch of the version changes the transfer time. I am dumbfounded trying to figure out what the cause might be. Since it is just a file transfer, why would the version even matter unless somehow SSCE is really not compacting and lying about its actual size.
Has anyone run into anything similar to this or may have any ideas what might be going on?
Thanks.
Can anyone tell me what would happen if you install more RAM on a server than SQL 2000 can handle?
We have a SQL 2000 Standard edition server that is getting a RAM upgrade and we are wondering if we exceed the 2Gb limit whether the machine will crash or SQL will just get on and use 2Gb leaving the rest for the other processes / OS etc ?
TIA
I'm working with a table that has a very large number of rows is there a way to limit the rows that are returned from a query, for example I only want the first 100 rows of data.
View 2 Replies View RelatedOn MS SQL Server MSDE what is the limit for a database size, or better yet, where can I view it and what if I need more?
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi,
we want to execute store procedure in paralel up to 250 times
procedure called from diffrent connections and create 4 temp tables during execution
so in total me might have 1000 temp tables with 5000 rows in each table.
I can place tempdb on separate drive and increase to any size.
Would 1000 temp tables be problem?
Thank you
Alex
Is it possible / advisable to use Sql Server as the backend database for handling 40 million transactions,
taking around 8 GB space?
In Oracle & Sybase you can set login resource limits to restrict, time of day, number of i-o's, cpu use etc for any login, at the login method. All actions done from a resource limit constrained login inherit the constraints.
Is there any way to implment this with any MS SQL Server version from 200-2005/SP2?
Before anyone answers, please do not suggest set rowcount etc.
thanks.
Where can I find info on how much data SQL Server can handle? What is too big of a table in terms of records? When (in terms of table/db size)does processing from a web site using querys and joins begin to bog down?
Thanks!
I have a query below that does not work:
select
rc_display,levelid, AccountID, Customer_Number_Tby, rc_series, LanguageID, level_description, leveloptionsid,
rc_unique, levelrcid, ring, ring_eng_block, description, description_long, component, Company_name, logo_location, AccessType, login_Name, account_pin, cb_comments, Emblem_DNF
from tmpKevin
group by
rc_display,levelid, AccountID, Customer_Number_Tby, rc_series, LanguageID, level_description, leveloptionsid,
rc_unique, levelrcid, ring, ring_eng_block, description, description_long, component,company_name, logo_location, AccessType, login_Name, account_pin, cb_comments, Emblem_DNF
Having Count(rc_display) > 1
However if I strip out a few columns:
select
rc_display,levelid, AccountID, Customer_Number_Tby, rc_series, LanguageID, level_description, leveloptionsid,
rc_unique, levelrcid, ring, ring_eng_block, description, description_long, component, Company_name
from tmpKevin
group by
rc_display,levelid, AccountID, Customer_Number_Tby, rc_series, LanguageID, level_description, leveloptionsid,
rc_unique, levelrcid, ring, ring_eng_block, description, description_long, component,company_name
Having Count(rc_display) > 1
This works. I work on MS SQLServer 2000. Is there a field limit with the group by clause?
Thanks
Kevin
I have a database with 10,000 records and I want to just see record1000 - 1025 is there an easy way to do this with a query. I have foundinfo for my SQL using limits but it does not work with SQL Server 2000.Please help.Thanks in advance.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have designed a datawarehouse and I have
tremendous doubt about SQL 7.0 capabilities.
I expect to receive more than 20.000.000 into
a single table and to be honest I do not know if
I will get a reasonable query-response time.
My Server is a Toshiba Lince with a 500 Mhz processor
and 256 Mb of RAM memory. My hard disks are IBM ones.
Can anybody say me something?
Thank you in advance.
Marcos Sá
Hi ,
I have 4 GB db with 6 tables,
table A parent of table B with cascade
update,delete
table B parent of C,D,E,F with cascade
update,delete
Today I deleted range of values(7000 rows) from table A, but NOT ALL data
deleted from B,C,D,E,F
Is any limitation for cascade delete
Db set to simple recovery, no errors deleting data
Im curious about how much data SQL Server 2000 can handle. Where does SQL Server stand today comparing to Oracle? It would be interesting to hear views and experiences from people here on swynk on SQL Server 2000. How big are the biggest tables, how many rows and speed etc. When is it time to consider using Oracle, if ever, instead of SQL Server 2000?
Regards,
S
HiWe received the following in an email from a third-party supplier (whonaturally has a solution for the problem as described). It sounds likegibberish to me, but does anyone have any comments?<quote>SQL in its current incarnation hits a performance brick wall when atable contains more than about 75 million rows. This is not aconfiguration limit as the table could be grown a lot larger but theperformance issue generates problems for ??????; primarily duringsearch and retrieval of archived objects; although if the databaseengine is being heavily hit for retrieval the archiving process canslow down as well.</quote>Chloe CrowderBritish Library
View 6 Replies View RelatedI'm new using SQL 2005 Express
I'm planning to use SQL Server Express 2005 for a asp net web application for a video rental store.
Is there a concurrent user conection limit that I should care?
TIA
Gerardo
Hi all,
I am migrating a data warehouse from SQL 2000 to 2005. So far, I have been able to convert all DTS's on the old server and most tables and users. I am having problems with some of my views, though. A view which involves over 5 tables, and some sub-views of those tables runs perfectly on SQL 2000, but on 2005 I get a Query Timed out Message. A typical run of this view can return from 200-1000 records. My guess is that it gets stuck somewhere in the subviews it has to run. So I wonder, what are the limitations of SQL 2005 concerning Queries and sub-queries (how many subqueries can a query have without timing out?). I mean, I would expect 2005 to have more processing capacity than SQL 2000 (on which this query runs perfectly). I have run some queries which don't run on 2000 but do run on 2005 and return over 4000 records.
Or is there some setting I haven't adjusted, like the time it takes for a query to time out? How would I adjust this, then?
Many thanks for the info.
Hi, can someone explain which are the limits o maximum values that SQLServer Express permit?
I dont see anywhere a compare table in which it says, 10 concurrent connections, etc.
Thanks in advance.
Hi folks. I'm trying to clear up some licensing confusion I"ve come across. First, if I use MIRROR on SS SE I am limited to a single REDO thread and Sycn mode. I see that on the Web. Will the singel REDO thread hurt the ability for the Secondary to keep up? Any one done any tests?
My confusion comes from a document that came across my desk a long time ago that showed that if you use MIRROR on SQL Server SE you are limited to 4 processors for the entire cluster. So if you wanted a balanced failover you would have to have two 2-ways in essence. Is this true? Is it not longer true? I can't seem to find any mention of this....did someone give me bad advice? Help! Thanks.
I am looking at the failover options for SQL Server 2005 and the mirroring option as documented in Using Database Mirroring with Office SharePoint Server and Windows SharePoint Services seems to cover this however I have a concern about the recommended limit of 10 databases.
Has anyone had any experience with this, i.e. can it support more and also what sizing limits would be expected (I assume as it uses transactions this is not an issue).
I nested a case to 15 levels and got an error message saying I could only nest it to 10. Is there a way to increse this??
TIA
Adam
Hello all.
For my first foray into this forum I have a tricky one....
We have a table in our database called tblJob with two columns:
id IDENTITITY(1,1)
jobNbr VARCHAR (5) (This would be, for example '12323')
When a new job is created (i.e. job Number 12323), the client wants a trigger on this table that creates a new table called tblJobData12323.
Does anyone know how I can accomplish this?
Thank you in advance.
PJ
PJ
Is there a limit to how much text you can concatenate (other than datatype limits, of course)? For example, if you write:SELECT 'This is some text from: ' + Convert(char(15), SomeFieldName01)+ 'some more text' + Convert(char(25), SomeFieldName02) + 'yet moretext.' As BigNoteFROM TableIs there a limit on how much you can concatenate into that big notefield, meaning is there a limit other than the size of the data type?
View 4 Replies View RelatedIn SQL Server 2000, I've got a rather lengthy stored procedure, whichcreates a lot of temporary tables as it processes down through a fewsets of data.When testing it through Query Analyzer, it runs fine (a bit slowthough). But when I try to run it through the ade, it doesn't doanything. It runs through the procedure in milliseconds but doesn'tseem to ever actually start it. If I change the calling code in theade VBA to refer to a different SP, it will call/run the different SP,so I don't think its the way I call it.Is there a limit to the number of lines a stored procedure can have,or some other limit on memory or transactions?
View 8 Replies View RelatedHi everybody,
I know that SQL2005 Express has 1 GB memory limitation.
Well, if my server has 2 GB RAM and I have other applications (without memory constraints) how does this relate to the SQL constraints ?
Can I still run SQL2005 Express if other applications exaust only 1 GigaByte of memory ?
Thank you in advance.
Pierluigi
What are the limits of SQL Server 2005 Express. I have 500,000 records and 60 users. Is this acceptable?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a database hosted by GoDaddy. Recently they made some changes to the interface and upgraded to SQL Server 2008. One or the other has made it impossible to access my data in one table.
The table is quite large in terms of the numbers of elements. Each row describes a dog and all the elements are components of the description. There are (I would guess) more than 50 elements all together.
When I try to search the database, the query form goes beyond the top and bottom of the page. I can scroll the database but the search tool (which lies atop the data) does not scroll. The result is that I can't activate the search.
I've tried about 10 machines. All with IE6 display this fault. Machines with IE7 do not. I've tried various screen resolutions on the machines with IE6. That doesn't help.
I've checked other tables in the database. No problem.
In short, there's nothing I can do. I can't edit my data and GoDaddy says, "Tough."
Is there a limit on the number of columns (elements) in a table in SQL Server 2008?
Eric
In the preview view in Visual Studio, I can see all of the items in my document map (over 100 labels). After deployment, only the first 30 items are displayed and I can not scroll down to see the missing items. Is this a known bug? is there any workaround?
Thanks
Dean
My product is growing rapidly and currently I have a db for each client with identical schema. Of course maintenance is pretty hard. I was thinking of using a shared db but having a schema for each client (sql 2005) - I have almost 100 tables in the schema which means with just 10 clients the db would pass 1000 tables. My gut is telling me this ain't going to fly!any ideas? and if it does work ... any thoughts on updating the internal schemas for each client?thanks-c
View 2 Replies View RelatedCan anyone confirm that SQL 2000 Standard Edition is still limited to 2GB of memory utilization on Windows 2003 Server?
In addition, anyone have suggestions for deploying SQL 2000 on Windows 2003?
TIA