Hi, is there a way how to enable / disable logging on web merge synchronization into the file websync.log? The file exists in the ISAPI folder, on some machines there are some messages, on others there is nothing. There are Timeout messages on the client during synchronization and we need to find where is the problem, if it is on the server side or if it is a network error or something else. Thanks, Pavel
Is there any procedure or option to disable and enable constraints on database.the problem is we are having lot master and child tables. when i am trying to move the entire data from original db to another same db, there i am getting constraints problem. child tables are not accepting data with out loading the master tables.
is there any to disable and enable constraints? please give me reply asap
Is there a chance to change the case sensitivity option for a running instance of sql server?
I know, during the install process, i can activate the case sensitivity. But can I change this option on an already installed server (to case sensitiv or back)?
Is there a way to turn on/off a given logger dynamically across the board, and still enable the logging of task specific events, like "ExecuteSQLExecutingQuery" from the ExecuteSQL task or "WMIDataReaderOperation" from the WMI Data Reader task?
The use case is one where multiple loggers are defined in a package (custom and stock) and I'd like to toggle the execution tracing on a per logger basis.
I realize "logger toggling" can be done programmatically, but I'm wondering if that's the only way to accomplish the objective.
I am a beginner in SQL Server Reporting Services. My report has three parameters; all with the same characteristics (combobox (multiple values, datatype: String, Available values: from query, default value:null).
When i am in the Preview Tab of the Report, the combo box of the first parameter is enabled, the combo box of the second parameter is disabled.
Once i select a value for the first parameter, the combo box of the second parameter becomes enabled.
I would like to select a value for the the second parameter in spite i did not select a value for the first parameter. I do not find a solution in the properties of the parameters.
Is it possible to run a trigger whenever a SQL user is disabled or enabled? From what I've seen of various sysusers and syslogins tables there isn't a column that represents enabled or disabled.
I have transaction replication setup on two SQL7 boxes and a nightly job runs a procedure that need to alter a table and disable a trigger. Since replication has been set up the disable doesn't work. Any way around this.
the disable trigger will be enable again.Because I already disable the trigger on last month, but when I check through the database, it enable again.I understand that, when we restore the database, all the trigger will be enable.How about SQL Cluster? will it enable the trigger??
ESQL1 will get max(id) from table and then based on the ID the remaining needs to be work.
Ex: If the ID=AUS-Sdy-1 then ESQL2 will update the tbl1 and return one IDkey based on this return key the ESQL3 will update a tbl2. ----------*( i want to disable ESQL4) else If the ID=AUS-Sdy-2 then ESQL3 will update the tbl1 and return one IDkey based on this return key the ESQL4 will update a tbl2. ----------- *(i want to disable ESQL2)
I currently have serverA importing data from an AS400 oledb connection and serverB on hot-standby as a mirror. The data import is being performed via an SSIS scheduled job.
I've yet to implement any solution in the following case: If the database on serverA fails, it will failover to the mirror. But the jobs will still be on serverA. Ideally, I'm assuming the jobs should not run on serverB since it will be attempting to update the mirrored database. So, I am wondering if both servers can have identical copies of SSIS packages and jobs and simply (?) enable or disable them based on which server will be hosting the principal database.
Is there any solution where the jobs can automatically be disabled on the server with the mirrored database and enabled on the principal database depending on its status?
I have a parameter for each field that lets me know if a field can be sorted or not. What I want to be able to do is turn on or off interactive sorting for that column based on that parameters value.
In the dialog you have a check box that says enable interactive sorting. When that is clicked it appears that you get the two arrows no matter what you put in the expression.
I have tried
=IIF(allowSorting,Fields!myColumn.Value,"")
and
=IIF(allowSorting,Fields!myColumn.Value,Nothing)
but both result in the arrows still being there, just the sort doesn't work.
Is it possible to put an expression on the sort arrows appearing at all?
I would like to ONLY allow using SQL Server authentication and restrict Windows Authentication. At the moment, i set the security to "SQL server and windows authentication". Now, even though i set the password for "sa", i can ignore the SQL Server authentication and just use Windows authentication to manipulate database objects???
can anybody give some suggestions to restrict windows authentication and allow sql server authentication?.
I have 2 dbs (SQL 2012) - one contains a trigger that is enabled/disabled by a procedure in the other database. This all works fine.
If I create a Database Project solution in Visual Studio 2012 SSDT (or 2013) for both databases, the stored procedure generates a SQL71502 stating that my trigger name can't be resolved.
To recreate the issue:
CREATE DATABASE DbWithTrigger GO USE DbWithTrigger GO CREATE TABLE dbo.TblWithTrigger( Id int NULL, SomeValue varchar(30) NULL
1. Create a new solution with a project named DbWithTrigger 2. In project settings set the Target platform to SQL 2012 2. Import the DbWithTrigger db into this project 3. Create a new project named DbCallsTrigger 4. In project settings set the Target platform to SQL 2012 5. Import the DbCallsTrigger db into this project 6. Add a Database Reference in DbCallsTrigger for DbWithTrigger
When you build the solution both dbs build successfully, however there are two warnings. One is easily resolved by replacing DbWithTrigger in the body of the procedure with [$(DbWithTrigger)] (db variable name for the reference) but I can't find out how to get rid of the other. Is it a bug?
I have made one package which extracts data from the source does transformation and submits the data to destination. Subsequently it also updates the required control files.
Now I want to add a functionality :
If the package is executed again it should check the status of previous execution in control file if success mark all tasks disable and stop
if failure mark all tasks at enable and start extracting data and continue further with execution.
I was able to attain similar functionality in SQL Server 2000 using activeX script. What code do I need to write as a part of Script Task in order to attain above functionality.
Hi people My users are having troubles with link to default drillthrough report when reports are exported to excel (they REALLY don't like this behavior ), so I decided set all of them disabled in report model, this work fine, but calculated field in reports has this drillthrough link.
Let me show you the situation. Entity Product has an UnitaryCost field, I set the EnableDrillthrough Property in False so when I export a report with this field, no link is shown.
But if I create in the report a calculated field Round(UnitaryCost) this field has a Drillthrough Link
Is this the standard and expected behavior? or its simply a BUG?
Have I done something wrong in my model? and in this case, How I can correct this?
I've a few tasks in my dataflow. Some of them are executed depending on an precedence constrain. Works fine.
The problem is following: I want to write a success message (execute SQL task), when all the tasks who have been executed have done this with success. For example, i ve ten tasks, and 2 of them are executed (successfully). This is good, i want to execute my task to write the success message.
I tried to set these precedence constraints with EvalOP = ExpressionOrConstraint, Values = Success and an expression, what returns TRUE, when the task above is not executed (the condition from a precedence constraint above). But the task to write my message will never be executed, because it seems the task does'nt give any result (neither success nor failure) when they ar not executed, and so my AND-Constraint for the success message task will only get TRUE, when ALL task are executed (and successful).
Is there any chance to get somethink like "isSuccess OR IsNotExecuted" into a precedence constraint?
What are your experiences with the alignment of constrains between tasks? I find it hard to align two task in an exact same vertical or horizontal position.
When you grab the green constrain lines with your mouse, you can see a soft pink dashed line which tels you which way to go with your mouse but it is so hard to get straight lines.
Is there a auto align task feature or something else I don't know of? How do you guys do it?
Hello! I'm looking for some ideas about how to ensure constraints on multiple rows. Of course one can use stored procedures and/or triggers while inserting. Other ideas?
The reason for this question is that it could be hard to ensure, because if lock level is not high enough, you can get duplicates during concurrency, if lock level is too high, it can result in deadlocks.
I have DTSX package where all the Control Flow Boxes are connected by precedence constraints (the Green Lines). However, only half of them visible! If I try and add another it says:
Cannot create connector. Only one workflow can exist between the same two executables. I don't want to have to drop and create them all the constraints (because there are a lot of them!) But I can't even do that - since I can't see them, I can't select them; and I don't think I can delete them without being able to select them. Am I missing something? Zooming in makes everything larger, but it doesn't make my Green Lines reappear. Help!
And yes, I'm using the latest version of everything:-
Microsoft Visual Studio 2005 Version 8.9.50727.762 (SP.050727-7600)
SQL SERVER 2005 9.00.3054.00 SP2 Developer Edition
I'd like to know the advantages and disadvantages of /3GB /PAE (AWE Disable) and /3GB /PAE (AWE Enable).
Server is Windows 2003 Enterprise is currently configured as /3GB /PAE (AWE Disable) and SQL Server Ent 2000 and AS2000 is up and running. Server has 8GB of physical ram.
Reading the blog: http://blogs.msdn.com/chadboyd/archive/2007/03/24/pae-and-3gb-and-awe-oh-my.aspx
From my understanding "/3GB /PAE (AWE Disable)" will make a 32bit User-Mode Process (say SQLServer or Analysis Services) to address "above 4GB of physical memory" by using its 32-bit Virtual Address Space (3GB because of /3GB switch) as a pointer mapping function to access data that is stored in the "above 4GB of physical memory".
This will allow the OS more physical memory space for storing "swapping" data instead of having to page this data to disk.
Now for "/3GB /PAE (AWE Enable)", this is the "above statements" plus, the capability of the process (SQL Server) to reserve the memory outside it's VAS for storage.
So in summary, "/3GB /PAE (AWE Disable)" will make the OS use the additional memory <4GB for "paging/swapping" purposes, due to the VAS limitation of 3GB for User-Mode process. and "/3GB /PAE (AWE Enable)" will make SQLServer "reserve in advance" w/ agreement with the MAX Memory setting, memory above 4GB.
So if this is all true, I'd like to get opinons on the advantages and disadvantages of enabling or disabling AWE. Noting that Analysis Services has a Max Memory of around 2.5GB and Min Memory of around 2.0GB and SQL Server has Min Memory of 0 and Max Memory of 3.5GB (to be increased? - even w/o AWE?)
Locally I develop in SQL server 2005 enterprise. Recently I recreated my db on the server of my hosting company (in sql server 2005 express).I basically recreated the tables and copied the data in it.I now receive the following error when I hit the DB:The 'System.Web.Security.SqlMembershipProvider' requires a database schema compatible with schema version '1'. However, the current database schema is not compatible with this version. You may need to either install a compatible schema with aspnet_regsql.exe (available in the framework installation directory), or upgrade the provider to a newer version.I heard something about running aspnet_regsql.exe, but I dont have that access to the DB. Also I dont know if this command does anything more than creating the membership tables and filling it with some default data...Any other solutions/thought on what this can be?Thanks!