Im having trouble stopping a transaction once the result on one or more of my sql statements rolls back the transaction. Take a look at one my first 'IF' statement (below). If the parameter '@Return' is 'False' i want the transaction rolleback and all sql execution to stop. But my problem is the rest of the sql gets executed and i end up getting rubbish data. Im still new to transactions so i think im doing something really wrong. Please take a look at my sql and help me out in what ever way you think is best. thanks in advance.
MattBEGIN TRY
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE
BEGIN TRANSACTION;
BEGIN
DECLARE @Return BIT;
SELECT @Return = (SELECT IsReturnable FROM INVENTORY WHERE InventoryID = 6)
IF (@Return = 'False') ROLLBACK TRANSACTION;
DECLARE @Already_In INT;
SELECT @Already_In = (SELECT ReturnedBy FROM InventoryInUse WHERE (CheckOutNumber = 375))
IF (@Already_In IS NOT NULL) ROLLBACK TRANSACTION;
DECLARE @Outstanding As INT;
SELECT @Outstanding = (SELECT (QtyTaken - 40) AS Outstanding FROM InventoryInUse WHERE (CheckOutNumber = 375));
DECLARE @OutstandingReason As VARCHAR(200);
DECLARE @Get_Person_ID INT;
Select @Get_Person_ID = (SELECT PersonID From [User] WHERE Username = 'matthewsk');
IF (@Outstanding < 0) ROLLBACK TRANSACTION;
ELSE IF (@Outstanding > 0)BEGIN
IF (@OutstandingReason = '') SELECT @RollBack = @RollBack + 1;
Hi there, I have decided to move all my transaction handling from asp.net to stored procedures in a SQL Server 2000 database. I know the database is capable of rolling back the transactions just like myTransaction.Rollback() in asp.net. But what about exceptions? In asp.net, I am used to doing the following: <code>Try 'execute commands myTransaction.Commit()Catch ex As Exception Response.Write(ex.Message) myTransaction.Rollback()End Try</code>Will the database inform me of any exceptions (and their messages)? Do I need to put anything explicit in my stored procedure other than rollback transaction? Any help is greatly appreciated
Thanks for your help in my date problem. It worked perfectly. I was away and could not answer back promptly.
yesterday, i was inserting data from a data file into a SQL table. 1 record had a name field as varchar. But it accidently, ended with a &. For example, "New Construction &". when I am inserting, its taking all records except this record that ends with a &. Is there any way to include this one Or should I tell my client that this is an error. If its an error, what is the expalnation(Like string char does not end with a & and & is a ------). Thanks others in the forum.
I am sorry. "New Construction &". Its not a column name. Its just a record. The table has a column called Name and it accidently, got a record that has "New Construction &" for the Name column.
Its not inserting that record with "New Construction &" in the Name field. Other records are fine.
I am attempting to learn Service Broker from Bob Beauchemin's book "A Developer's Guide to SQL Server" - Chapter 11. I'm finding it to be very good but I'm confused over the concept of closing a conversation. Could someone answer the following questions for me?
When a conversation is ended, can the conversation handle that was created when the conversation was created still be used? (I assume not) Beauchemin says, on page 511, that when a conversation ends, "Any messages still in the queue from the other end of the conversation are deleted with no warning." Does this mean that if I send a message that expects a reply, but I end the conversation, the message is still sent, it is still received by the other endpoint, the other endpoint processes it, but I'll never receive the reply? Beauchemin says that if no lifetime is specified, the conversation is active for the number of seconds which can be represented by the maximum size of an integer. Does this mean that if I don't specify a lifetime, a conversation is active for many, many years?
Alright here's my situation. I have two servers both running Eval copies of SQL Server 2005 Enterprise. This is only because I had the promise that I would be getting a shiney new server with a fully licensed copy of the server soon so I wasn't worried when I setup these two programs to use these. Now they are dragging their feet to approve the server and software so I'm scared. First question - What will happen when the eval period runs out? Second question - Can I tell what the date was when I installed the server?
These both will help me push management to approve atleast the purchase of an SQL license if I can't get the server.
I'm using SQL SERVER 2000 and in the process of establishing recoveryguide.Tried to rebuild master using rebuildm.exe but the "Configuring Server"never ending. Then I tried to copy original databases from SQLServerInstallation CD to hard disk as the "Browse for folder", but gave thesame problem. Need advice what need to be done.
I have a process that seems to leave many orphaned sessions over a period of time. The software is by a 3rd party vendor and they can't seem to fix it. It is safe to end the orphaned sessions and I do that on a regular basis. My questions is: What is the best way to do this via T-SQL?
I can select the orphaned sessions by using a simple query on the sys.dm_exec_sessions table. How do I then run a kill command for each session_id from that query?
What i have tried has'nt even been close to a solution. UPDATE dbo.t_Work_Hours SET WeekEnding = DATETIME ( ??? , StartTime) . I have no idea where to go!
I've read Remus' article on Fire and Forget tactics when it comes to ending conversations, and I have to admit I am guilty of sending a message to a service and immediately ending the conversation. I've set up a stored procedure to end the conversation on the initiator queue, but I'm guessing it's never being fired because I am not ending the conversation in the target activated stored proc, which is a CLR stored proc.
Can you tell me how to end the conversation from a CLR stored proc?
Now that I think of it none of the code I use in my TSQL activated stored procs to handle different message types and error-checking is done in the CLR stored proc.
I have a job in SQL Server agent with 199 SSIS steps and growing. In the job log only 99 steps are shown, which is a problem if a step higher than 99 fails to run. I need the steps to run in sequence and preferable would like to split the job into several jobs each containing no more than 99 steps. The only thing I don't know is if it is possible to have the next job in sequence start only when the previous job has finished.
Does anyone know if this is possible, and if so how it is done?
Hi, I have a simple web application which calls a stored procedure. The stored procedure operates as a transaction and runs for several minutes. I've created a partial class to set the SQLcommand timeout property to avoid any timeouts, which works fine. Unfortunately though, when the application is run in the production environment, it ends in an error after a certain amount of time (maybe a couple of minutes - not exactly sure), which seems to be the same each run. It doesn't appear to end the stored procedure though, which results in locking the tables. It runs fine in the development environment, and it doesn't appear as though any error information is provided when the application crashes. I'm assuming that the ASP.NET application is timing out for some reason, but the stored procedure itself is fine. I can run it directly from SQL server without any dramas. In the Virtual Directory configuration within IIS, I have the script timeout period set to 1200 seconds. The Default Web-Site timeout property is set to 120 seconds, but I'm assuming that this is only for internet connection timeout, not database transaction timeouts. Any information as to what may be causing this is appreciated. Thanks
Morning Guys, I have a database where I need to kill a remote connection. If I was manually logged into the box i would you a netstat command to stop the service. I would like to end a process from another machine before starting a restore process
I need to write VS2005 C# code using SQL OLE DB to access SQL Server 2005. I have no choice in that matter. I can create a database user with a password like COMPANY", which is a string of uppercase characters ending in an unmatched double-quote mark.
Using Microsoft SQL Server Server Management Studio I login using Windows Authentication, create an account with the password, COMPANY", check the "Enforce password policy", click "OK", and then exit.
Setup
I launch Microsoft SQL Server Server Management Studio again, select "SQL Server Authentication", type in the account name and the COMPANY" password, click the Connect button, and I'm in.
Problem
Now, I need to connect programmatically and run a stored procedure. The password is stored in clear text in hte Registry€”not my choice, it's a legacy application, and changing that is not an option open to me. (We have probably all seen company safes where the combination is scribbled on the wall in case you forget it!)
If I set the connection string in the registry to COMPANY", I get an error like this:
Server Error in '/' Application.
Response is not available in this context. Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.
Exception Details: System.Web.HttpException: Response is not available in this context.
Source Error:
Line 60: catch (System.Exception e) Line 61: { Line 62: Response.Write(e.Message.ToString()); Line 63: } Line 64: Source File: C:sourceProductNameDataCenterAdm&ReportsWebPagesProductNameWebCommonCodeCommon.cs Line: 62
Stack Trace:
[HttpException (0x80004005): Response is not available in this context.] System.Web.UI.Page.get_Response() +2077605 SiteIQWeb.CommonCode.Common..ctor() in C:ProductNameDataCenterAdm&ReportsWebPagesProductNameWebCommonCodeCommon.cs:62 SiteIQWeb.MasterPage..ctor() in C:ProductNameDataCenterAdm&ReportsWebPagesProductNameWebMasterPage.master.cs:21 ASP.masterpage_master..ctor() in c:WINDOWSMicrosoft.NETFrameworkv2.0.50727Temporary ASP.NET Files oot 255b545c8a400c7App_Web_hfj8popy.0.cs:0 __ASP.FastObjectFactory_app_web_hfj8popy.Create_ASP_masterpage_master() in c:WINDOWSMicrosoft.NETFrameworkv2.0.50727Temporary ASP.NET Files oot 255b545c8a400c7App_Web_hfj8popy.3.cs:0 System.Web.Compilation.BuildResultCompiledType.CreateInstance() +49 System.Web.UI.MasterPage.CreateMaster(TemplateControl owner, HttpContext context, VirtualPath masterPageFile, IDictionary contentTemplateCollection) +250 System.Web.UI.Page.get_Master() +48 System.Web.UI.Page.ApplyMasterPage() +18 System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +685
Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:2.0.50727.1433; ASP.NET Version:2.0.50727.1433
The closes to success I have been able to come is to set the password to "COMPANYNAME""" or 'COMPANYNAME"', which results in a System.Data.OleDb.OleDbConection Exception with a HResult of 0x80040e4d, and the message Login failed for user 'username'.
Questions
Can the password be formatted differently in the registry, or somehow processed after retrieving it, so that SQL Server 2005 will accept it?
Is this a bug in .NET Framework or SQL OleDb?
Is this simply a case of "Is it hurts, don't do it"?
Thanks in advance. As with all postings, my job, promotion, product success, company future, or some combination thereof is on the line.
I have an very long ntext field, made up of many sentences that I append a full stop to every one, I also strip out any line breaks within the text. However I get this error, when I look it up it comes up with "Failed to locate the ending boundary of a sentence."
Hi All, Can anybody suggest me a website where I can find articles on Managing transactions with Sql server. Also a scenario where the transactions take place in a environment involving 2 different databases, Like the bank account and credit card transactions (specifically of 2 way kind) Thanks
I have a web application with a shopping cart, how do I stop all the shopping cart transaction from going into the db log? Is this possible? These are are only transient data movements, and will never be need to to restore to, and they are cause log bloat. Or is there a better way to stop log bloat?
How can we change connection properties in a DTS pkg with connection? You can loop through the connection count but the connection ID is not static one.So can’t rely on that. Is there another way of changing connection properties?
I am currently designing a DTS Package to import data that is processed daily into a large database.
I have to design the package such that if any step fails when importing, I roll back the entire transaction.
I have designed the package with this in mind, checked "join transaction if present" and "rollback transaction on failure" in all of the workflows. I have also made all workflows serialized.
However, when I run the package, it fails on one of the data pumps with the error:
I am replicating (finally!!) and on my publishers agent history I can see it says xx transactions with xx commands were delivered. (xx being the number) Where can I look to see what the transactions or commands are?
Is there a place the system stores this information?
Is there a point to wrapping a single UPDATE or INSERT statement in an explicit TRANSACTION:
BEGIN TRANSACTION
INSERT INTO Table (...) VALUES (...)
COMMIT TRANSACTION
I understand ACID and concept of transactions. However, I thought they were only necessary for multi-statement operations. I'm maintaining code that does this and am wondering if this is necessary. Does SQL Server guarantee ACID for single statements? Are single UPDATE/INSERT statements prone to race condition like affects without using explicit transactions?
If you run the Begin Transaction code and then run a create such as an update query and you see that it effects the number of rows that you wanted it to effect is there a way to look at the actual data that changed before you Commit Transaction?
I have a table with around 240 columns and one of the column in the Table is the Inserttime ( DATETIME ) and I using a GETDATE() function in the stored Proc, when we insert data into the table. In the same Milli second 2007-06-27 09:32:58.303 , I have around 7600 records in the database. The Stored Proc is called for each Individual record and we don't bunch the transactions. Is this possible.
I did some bench marking on this server and I can insert only 700 - 800 records approx / sec on this particular table.