I'd like to create a relationship between two tables in sql server 2005, where a User can be a Partner and a Partner must be a User. So it 0-1 and 1-1. How do I enforce this relationship?
I will also be creating a view from this, will there be any problems when inserting data into the view?
I might aswell add that I'm actually working on asp.net's new membership and roles, so I don't want to change the default tables.
How can I create a one-to-one relationship in a SQL Server Management Studio Express Relationship diagram?
For example:
I have 2 tables, tbl1 and tbl2.
tbl1 has the following columns:
id {uniqueidentifier} as PK
name {nvarchar(50)}
tbl2 has the following columns:
id {uniqueidentifier} as PK
name {nvarchar(50)}
tbl1_id {uniqueidentifier} as FK linked to tbl1.id
If I drag and drop the tbl1.id column to tbl2 I end up with a one-to-many relationship. How do I create a one-to-one relationship instead?
mradlmaier
I have four tables with relationships as shown. They have a circular relationship and so one of the relationships is forced to be inactive.
Operation (Commodity, OperationKey) ==========>
Commodity (Commodity)
/
/
|
|
Advice (OperationKey) ====== (inactive)=======>
Operation Commmodity (Commodity, OperationKey)
I have the following measure:
Advice No. Commodity:=CALCULATE (
COUNTROWS ( 'Advice' ),
USERELATIONSHIP(Advice[OperationKey],'Operation Commodity'[OperationKey]),
operation
)
However, the userelationship function does not override the active relationship between Operation & Advice and so the measure is limited to Advices directly filtered by the Operation table.
If I delete the relationship between Operation and Advice, then the measure works as expected i.e. Operation indirectly filters Operation Commodity which filters Advice.
Hello,
I have a reporting services application that needs to run reporting services without a user context. However, it will not pass the SSL check. I am using a self-signed certificate that is in the trusted certificates store. What I would really like to do is run reporting services without enforcing SSL (just not allow port 80 connections from the firewalll for security) and merely allow SSL connections when they come in so that any local programs can use reporting services without the need for SSL. As far as I know, Reporting Services (ISAPI filter?) is somehow checking the http headers and not allowing, at least an anonymous, a connection *unless* SSL is forced (WHY?). If my app redirects using the https://FQDN or http://localhost to reporting services it fails the SSL check.
Is there a way around this or can simply do something with the certificate store, like trusted certificates or publishers, so that my local programs can pass the SSL check?
Hi all,
sql server 2000
windows 2000
authentication is through the db (not windows).
I am attempting to limit access to one of our production sql server databases. I want to ensure that only application users can connect to the db, i.e they connect to the application and the application connects to the database (database access is transparent to them). The app uses a common login account.
I would like to prevent users from connecting to the db using ad hoc query tools or other EDIs (toad for sql server, ...). Currently there is nothing stopping them from doing so using the application acct/pwd.
I am contemplating writing a trigger that checks for the program that the user is using and if the program is not recognized, kill the session. Is this the right approach or is/are there any "out of the box" utilities that will do this for me?
FYI. the acct/pwd that the app uses to access the db is well known to users.
Greetings all!
How can I enforce a foreign key constraint when I have two tables each one residing on a different database?
Thanks for your help in advance.
I am trying to understand constraints and minimum cardinality.
In a relationship between 2 tables, t1 and t2, with a parent to child relationship of
1 to 1 or more
how is the minimum cardinality enforced?
If both sides of the relationship require at least one occurrence, how would the insert be done? How can you insert into table t1 when it has a constraint that there must be an occurrence in table t2, or vice versa?
Any help in understanding this is greatly appreciated!
Hi all,
Are there any built-ins, utilities, ... within sql server 2000 that can be used to enforce password complexity in the database. i.e at least 8 characteres, upper and lowercase mix, includes at least on number and one punctuation (underscore,...).
I understand that this requirement can be achieved using windows authentication. Unfortunately we do not have that luxury (at the moment).
tx.
Running SQL2005 and on occasion I see durations of 928809 or even 2830562 in the trace for commands that usually run in the 7000 range. Reads are still in the 1200's even during the huge duration spikes. These are calls from ASP.NET ADO.NET and there should be a 30 second timeout on them by default to boot. I see a few other times that we've logged timeouts so I know the timeout is working at times but not at others. Any ideas what's going on both with the strange serious outliers and the fact that these queries aren't timed out properly?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have designed an SSIS package that :
(1) contains a for loop task (in which all the logic is contained) that loops through a particular folder for excel files
WITHIN THE FOR LOOP:
(2) pulls data from an excel file into SQL Tables(Data Transformation Task)
(3) run stored proc to validate data (Execute SQL TASK)
(4)ON SUCCESS of executing the SQL Task (Script Task - move file to success or reject folder based on value returned from sproc)
(5)ON FAILURE of executing the stored proc (Script Task - move file to bad format failure)
NOTE:
I have modified the MaximumErrorcount property of (1 FOR LOOP) and (3 EXECUTE SQL TASK) and the package itself to 0.
In order to deal with badly formatted excel files...I do not want the package to stop for every missing tab in excel file or data entry error. I simply want the badly formatted file to be moved to a special folder
PROBLEM:
on failure logic is never executed (I have 2 options after step (3)) on success do step (4) on failure do step (5)
step (3) fails...then it simply iterates to the next file
step 5 is never executed
Is this because I changed the maximumerrorcount property?
What am I doing wrong witht he Precendence Logic?
I want to enforce a unique constraint on a column which must be encrypted in MSSQL 2005 using Cell Level Encyption (CLE).
CREATE MASTER KEY ENCRYPTION BY PASSWORD = 'itsaSECRET!!!3£3£3£!!!'
CREATE CERTIFICATE ERCERT WITH SUBJECT = 'A cert for use by procs'
CREATE SYMMETRIC KEY ERKEY
WITH ALGORITHM = AES_256
ENCRYPTION BY CERTIFICATE ERCERT
[Code] ....
The output makes it obvious why the constraint has 'not' been enforced.
Email
-------
1 | 0x00703529AF46D24BA863A3534260374E01000000328909B51BA44A49510F24DF31
C46F2E30977626D96617E2BD13D9115EB578852EEBAE326B8F3E2D422230478A29767C
2 | 0x00703529AF46D24BA863A3534260374E01000000773E06E1B53F2C57F97C54370FECBB45B
C8A154FEA5CEEB9B6BB1133305282328AAFAD65B9BDC595F0006474190F6482
3 | 0x00703529AF46D24BA863A3534260374E01000000C9EDB1C83B52E60598038D832D34
D75867AB0ABB23F9044B7EBC76832F22C432A867078D10974DC3717D6086D3031BDB
But, how do I work around this?
Hi,
In Analysis Services there is an option to enforce a role either on the client side or the server side.
Can someone kindly guide what's the recommended approach and what's really the difference between the two options.
Thanks.
How can I set a one-to-one relationship using the Management Studio Express and SQL Server 2005 Express
tblClient, CleintID (PK)
tblProcess, ClientID (FK)
Hello
I have need to write a query that I can pass in a bunch of filter criteria, and return 1 result....it's just ALL of the criteria must be matched and a row returned:
example:
Transaction table: id, reference
attribute table: attributeid, attribute
transactionAttribute: attributeid, transactionid
Example dat
Attribute table contains: 1 Red, 2 Blue, 3 Green
Transaction table contains: 1 one, 2 two, 3 three
transactionAttribute contains: (1,1), (1,2), (1,3), (2,3), (3,1)
If I pass in Red, Blue, Green - I need to be returned "one" only
If I pass in Red - I need to be returned "three" only
If I pass in Red, Green - nothing should be returned as it doesn't EXACTLY match the filter criteria
If anyone's able to help that would be wonderful!
Thanks, Paul
How to create a relation between gf_game and gf_gamegenre here? gf_gamegenre is responsible for the relation between a game and it's genre(s). The relationship between gf_genre and gf_gamegenre worked. (http://img361.imageshack.us/my.php?image=relationzl9.jpg)
When I try to set a relationshop between gamegenre and game I'm getting this error:
'gf_game' table saved successfully'gf_gamegenre' table- Unable to create relationship 'FK_gf_gamegenre_gf_game'. The ALTER TABLE statement conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint "FK_gf_gamegenre_gf_game". The conflict occurred in database "gamefactor", table "dbo.gf_game", column 'gameID'.
Thanks for any help!
Can anyone provided insight on how to create a one-to-one relationship between
SQL tables? Every time I try to link two tables that should be one-to-one, the link says one-to-many.
How can I specify one-to-one when SQL Server automatically thinks it is a one-to-many?
Thanks,
Kellie
hi all,
how to implement the many to many relation ship....
i get stucked it.......
plz help
thanx
sajjad
Hey,
I know I'm asking a stupid question but I need to get a clear response please:
why using One-to-One relationship instead of meging the 2 tables in only one?
thanks.
Hi,
do you use ISA relationship or do you avoid it? Why?
Could you write me some its benefitsand drowback?
Thanks
Hey,
is it possible to get the relationship of a table via sql? Like I need to know which relations the table t has. Is that possible?
Thanks
I created 2 tables with one to one relationship. if I add a record intable A, how does table B record get created? Does SQL do thisautomatically because it is one to one relationship? or do I need tocreate a trigger? if i need a trigger, how do I get the ID of newrecord to create the same ID in table B?thanks for any help.Joe Klein
View 7 Replies View RelatedHi,Do you guys know what's wrong with a one-to-one relationship?The reason I want to make it like this is that at the very end of the chain,the set of keys is huge. I want to limit the number of columns to be thekey. i.e. the [company] table has 1 column as the key. The [employee]table will have 2 columns as the key.e,g,If I add a [sale] table to the [company]-[employee] relationship, the thirdtablewill have 3 columns as the key -- "company id", "employee id", and "saleid".(e.g.)I have a company with many employees and computers. But instead of classifyall these, I just want to call all these as an entity. A company is anentity. An employee is just another entity. etc.So, instead of a one-to-many:[company]---*[employee]---*[sale]||*[computer]I make it one-to-one.[entity]---*[entity]If I want to know the name and address of the entity "employee", I will havea 1-to-1 table [employee] to look up the information for this employeeentity.[entity]---*[entity]||[company]||[employee]||[computer]||[sale]--[color=blue]> There is no answer.> There has not been an answer.> There will not be an answer.> That IS the answer!> And I am screwed.> Deadline was due yesterday.>> There is no point to life.> THAT IS THE POINT.> And we are screwed.> We will run out of oil soon.[/color]
View 13 Replies View RelatedHow do I create a one to one relationship in a SQL2005 Express database? The foreign key needs to be the same as the primary key so it can't just increment to the next number.
View 6 Replies View Related Hi.
I get this error when i try to create a relationship in a db diagram (sql 2005)
"'tblActivedir' table saved successfully
'tblClient' table
- Unable to create relationship 'FK_tblClient_tblActivedir1'.
Introducing FOREIGN KEY constraint 'FK_tblClient_tblActivedir1' on table 'tblClient' may cause cycles or multiple cascade paths. Specify ON DELETE NO ACTION or ON UPDATE NO ACTION, or modify other FOREIGN KEY constraints.
Could not create constraint. See previous errors."
What i have is 2 tables.
1 named client
1 named activedir
In the client table the columns i want to bind with activedirtable are FR1 and DC1
I want to bind them in the ID of the activedir table (both, in different fk relationships) so that they get the id of activedir.
Fr1 has an fk relationship with activedir (pk is activedir' id)
and DC1 exactly the same in another fk.
So i want both columns to comunicate with activedir.
If p.e. activedir has 3 elements (a,b,c) when i delete element a then werever FR1 or DC1 have this element(binded to it's id) then the element will also be deleted (id of the element) from both FR1 and DC1
I don't want to set Delete and Update action to none because i want the element changed or deleted from activedir, to do the same on Fr1 or DC1 or both.
Any help?
Thanks.
I am trying to create a 1:1 relationship, but not primary key to primary key. In table 1 I have a uniqueidentifier as a primary key. In table 2 I have an int as the primary key and a column that takes the uniqueidentifier from table 1. Everytime I drag and drop the relationship line and link table 1 to table 2 it creates a 1:N relationship: ie. tbl1.primarykey links to tbl2.column2. So I'm not linking primary key to primary key however I still want a 1:1 relationship.
How do I do that?
Thanks in advance.
SQLServer 2005 - I have two tables. One has a field defined as a Primary Unique Key. The other table has the same field, but the Index is defined as non-Unique, non-clustered. There is no primary key defined on the second table. I want to set up a one-to-many relationship between the two, but am not allowed.
This should be simple. What am I doing incorrectly?
This is the message that i get when trying to assign keys when creating diagrams in visual express:
'tbh_Polls' table saved successfully
'tbh_PollOptions' table
- Unable to create relationship 'FK_tbh_PollOptions_tbh_Polls'.
The ALTER TABLE statement conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint "FK_tbh_PollOptions_tbh_Polls". The conflict occurred in database "C:USERSSTICKERDOCUMENTSMY WEB SITESPERCSHARPAPP_DATAASPNETDB.MDF", table "dbo.tbh_Polls", column 'PollID'.
PollID is my primary key in tbh_Polls
And PollID is in tbh_PollOptions table
No matter what I do, I get this message, I'm Lost!
Help plz.
Thanks
I have a fact table with 2 fields : "Dim Code 1" and "Dim Code 2" that I want to link with a Dim table.
I don't want to create two dimensions Dim1 and Dim2 but only one dimension with something like :
Code Snippet
Dim.Code=Fact.DimCode1 OR Dim.Code=Fact.DimCode2
Is it possible to do this ?
Thanks in advance
Hi.
(Sorry if i am not posting this in the right forum)
well i am learning to create a small software and have come up with four tables which are as follows;
Client
date
<!--[if !vml]--><!--[endif]-->client_id
name
address
contact_num
Smoking
smoking_id
client_id
meas_arm
meas_neck
meas_shoulder
Color_code
description
Trousers
trousers_id
client_id
meas_leg
meas_hips
meas_waist
color_code
description
Shirt
shirt_id
client_id
meas_arm
meas_neck
meas_shoulder
color_code
description
My question
Is it possible to have a relationship linking one single table to other several one.
For example i wanted to relate the field client_id from table client which is the primary to tables shirt,trousers and smoking with the client_id field which is the foreign key ?
thanks
Hi there everyone, this is my first post so go easy on me :)
Basically I am trying to get my database to copy the value in the UserId (unique identifier field) from the aspnet_Users table to a foreign key UserId in a table called userclassset. I have made this field the same datatype and created a relationship between the two. Unfortunately, when I add a user using the ASP.Net configuration tool it does not automatically copy this value into my own custom table. I have noticed it is however automatically copied into the aspnet_Membership table. Any pointers on how to solve this would be great!
Thanks :)
Hi, how can i make optional relationship?
for example: In table A, there is column 1, column 2, column3. In table B, there is column 4, column 5 and column 6.
column 1 and column 2 are primary keys for table A and table B. The relationships between table A and table B are column 2 and column 5; column3 and column 6. but optional (ie. when data exists in column 2, then column3 is null)
how can i set the relationship? because one of the columns data is null each time, error always occurs.
Hello, I created some SQL 2005 tables using Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio. I need to get the script code of those tables. I was able to do that by right clicking over each table. But how can I get the code for the relationships between the tables? Can't I create relationships between two tables by using T-SQL? Thanks, Miguel
View 3 Replies View RelatedWhen I try to insert a record on my DB (SQL 2005 Express) I get a constraint error. This is my table setup which has been simplified to expose the problem I have:
Categories TABLEint CatId PKvarchar CatName :
Items TABLEint ItemId PKvarchar ItemName :
X_Items_Categoriesint CatIdint ItemId
So basically I have a one-to-many relationship between Items and Categories, in other words each item is associated to one or more categories and this association is done via the X_Items_Categories cross table. On this cross table I set two constraints:
The CatId of each entry in the cross table (X_Items_Categories) must exist in the Category table, and