I like to get a feedback from other DBA's out there, I have a user with a consultant that need's Enterprise Manager installed on the user's desktop
in order for them to develop code for the user.
Is the above a good reason to give out to the user the Enterprise Manager
tools?
Please give me what is acceptable tools for the user/consultan.
Thank you
Jorge
I have a problem. I am using the developers version of SQL Server Enterprise edition.
I am trying to run a command in MS command prompt:
Aspnet_regsql -E -S localhost -ssadd -sstype p
After I execute this command, I receive a Name Pipe
error that under the default settings, SQL Server
doesn't allow remote connections. I took some steps
to try to resolve the problem:
1) I googled the interrnet to see if there was any one
else who ran into the same problem and if there was a
quick resolution.
2) I check SQL Server Books on line about SQL server
configuration manager and how to enable remote
connections using Name Pipes and TCP/IP.
3) I used C:WINDOWSsystem32cliconfg.exe to enable
Name Pipes and TCPIP to be enable on the client.
4) I enabled SQl Server Browser to help me with my
problem
5) I stopped the Database engine, enable local and
remote connections using Name pipes and TCP/IP,then I
restarted the database engine along with SQl server
Agent.
6) I did check SQl Server error logs to see what port
it was listening on , but I thought that SQl Server
was suppose to listen on port 1433 by default, and
Name pipes /SQL/query.
7)I have check the error logs to see what port that SQL Server was listening to
and trying to use the port number in the client config utility. I am still getting the same error.
8) I tried to remove name pipes in the SQL Server Surface Manager and allow local and remote connections using only TCP/IP. I still get the same error. I did stop and restarted the Database Engine.
What steps have I not taken , and what should I do to correct this problem?
How do I go about accessing the SQL Server Enterprise Manager to use DTS?
Robert
I'm not a developer and would like your input to compare against what a sales rep is telling me.
I'm managing a small web project that will have a database with a max of 20,000 records with less than 50 field each. It will be hit by anything from 200 to 500 people in a day (max) via Internet connection from all over with all sorts of speed.
The users will select less than 50 filters to obtain the results of the info they are looking for among the 20000 records. Most users will only choose less than 10 filters per search.
That's all that the database will do...seems to me enterprise is way too much, but since I'm not expert, need one of you to help with your input.
Thanks very much!
Hi guys,
I want to give someone read only permission to our SQL server so they can log in and look at the database structure and query a few tables. I've set up the user but the problem is that when I connect in SQL server remotley, it shows all the other DB's on the server even though it is restricting access to them. Can these other DB's be hidden so that only the DB the user has access to shows up?
Cheers for your help!
I've searched around google & here and can't find a solution.
I can connect to my database via a connection string on the web server
but cannot connect via Enterprise Manager or just by ODBC connection on
my local machine.
I can ping the server fine and switched off my XP firewall & my router firewall, port 1433 is also open.
Someone has tested this from another machine and it works fine (cheers).
What else can I try, this is driving me insane!
Thanks in advance
R
p.s I'm on Win XP SP2, SQL Server 2000 sp3a
Hi,
I have a user who has created several SQL7 databases and uses a VB app which schedules jobs (under the sa account) on the SQL server. How can I allow this user to view scheduled jobs on the server ? I don't want to give him too many priviledges.
Thanks,
Tim
We just installed an application, WhatsUpGold, to monitor our servers. Management won't let me host that on my primary SQL box. So, we are using MSDE on the local machine (call that box my_netmon).
I can access the db with very basic functionality using osql while on the my_netmon machine. I've added my domain user account as a System Admin using the following commands.
exec sp_grantlogin @name
go
exec sp_addsrvrolemember @name, 'sysadmin'
But when I go to the my_sql machine and try to attach to it with Enterprise Manager I get an error that the server does not exist.
What gives??? Is it just not possible, or am I missing something here?
My goal is to just be able to see the data stored in the MSDE db. Write views, etc...
Please advise,
Marc
We are expanding an application's database hardware to have a mirrored failover server. Normally in this case we just have the application add "Failover Partner=MirredServerName" in the connection string.
However, this application is using the Enterprise Library Data Access Block and we can't find any documentation describing how to setup the Failover Partner using this library. Any help would be appreciated.
JOHNF
Hello,
I am running an SAP installation on clustered DELL poweredge 1850's with a shared scsi disk system. I am running Windows 2000 sp4 with sql 2000 sp4. I am trying to restore a database from a .bak file on a clustered disk. When I attempt to access the disk through enterprise manager it is not there. I only get access to the E: drive (which is clustered as well)
I am running Visual Studios 2005 enterprise edition and I am creating a mobile application to keep track of some receipts. The problem I'm currently having is that even though I can connect to the MS Access Database with Server Explorer that I'll be aquiring data from; Everytime I attempt to use the Data Configuration Wizard to add a new data source that namely the database I get this error message:
The new connection uses a data provider that is not supported. (end of message)
There is no username or password necessary to access this database and it is an Access 2003 database.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
I am a new in .Net Environment. I am moving from VB to VB.Net and Access DB to SQL Server 2005. Please reply me the following questions bellow.
Access Works
SQL SERVER (SS)?
When I create .MSI file it include ADO library in that executable file and my client install software and don€™t need any kind of file to install and wherever my program install it can be accessed by using following connection string.
Con.ConnectionString = "Provider=Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0;Data Source=" & App.Path & "dbPAYROLL_DB.mdb;Persist Security Info=False" Con.Open
What file needed on client€™s PC to access SS on server.
What about connection string change dynamically in client sides
I create relation on Access Relationship Diagram.
Where to create these diagrams either on VB.Net Server Explorer or on Management Studio? And how?
Please answers me this basic questions further I have more question in mind but please first answers me these questions€¦
Hello AllI am using SQL server 2000 as the backend of my application but don'twant my clients tobe able to view or edit the database tables, storedprocedures , view etc using enterprise manager or query analyser (orsimilar tools)How can this be done ?I searched a lot for this but unable to get the correct answer isthere anybody to give full solution regarding this.Please relpy me as early as possible
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am trying to find a solution to my woes creating CLR activation stored procedure that references Enterprise library data access dlls. Does anyone know best practices to deploy .NET 2.0 assemblies as SQLCLR. I am using VS2005 SqlClrProject to deploy my .NET 2.0 assemblies to Sql Server and it fails with error such as "Assembly was not found in the sql catalog". If I manually try to load a referenced assembly within SqlServer by browsing to the target location, like for example, System.Management.dll it fails with similar error, trying to resolve its dependencies. Even if I manage to walk through the dependency tree and resolve it to the final dependent dll, I am only able to load it in "UNSAFE" mode. Any recommendations, suggestions and feedback are welcome.
Thanks in advance.
This is my code...
public partial class test : System.Web.UI.Page
{protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{SqlDatabase database = (SqlDatabase)DatabaseFactory.CreateDatabase("ConnectionString");DbCommand command = database.GetSqlStringCommand("SELECT UserName FROM Users WHERE UserID = '6264'");
using (IDataReader reader = database.ExecuteReader(command))
{if (reader.Read())
{lblTest.Text = "test";
}
}
}
}
This is my error:
Server Error in '/' Application.
Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached.
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. Exception Details: System.InvalidOperationException: Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached.Source Error:
Line 21: //DbCommand command = database.GetStoredProcCommand("CorrUsers_GetByUserId_s");
Line 22: DbCommand command = database.GetSqlStringCommand("SELECT UserName FROM Users WHERE UserID = '6264'");
Line 23: database.ExecuteReader(command);
Line 24: using (IDataReader reader = database.ExecuteReader(command))
Line 25: {Source File: d:webwwwrootchacha078dev.cha.toplingo.com est.aspx.cs Line: 23 Stack Trace:
[InvalidOperationException: Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached.]
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection) +1261381
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionClosed.OpenConnection(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory) +105
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open() +111
Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Data.Database.GetNewOpenConnection() +195
Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Data.Database.GetOpenConnection(Boolean disposeInnerConnection) +106
Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Data.Database.ExecuteReader(DbCommand command) +62
test.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) in d:webwwwrootchacha078dev.cha.toplingo.com est.aspx.cs:23
System.Web.Util.CalliHelper.EventArgFunctionCaller(IntPtr fp, Object o, Object t, EventArgs e) +15
System.Web.Util.CalliEventHandlerDelegateProxy.Callback(Object sender, EventArgs e) +33
System.Web.UI.Control.OnLoad(EventArgs e) +99
System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +47
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +1436
Any help with this matter would be very much appreciated.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey Pham
I'm really new to MSDE so I just want to know...Is SQL Server 2000 a prerequisite for MSDE particularly for developers? If yes, then is it(SQL Server 2000) a prerequisite for clients?
The thing is, I can't find a tool where I can create databases after installing MSDE...the only way I can think of is also installing SQL Server 2000 and create the database from there...
Hi,
I've just released Nautilus v1.0.6. I would apreciatte your opinion and comments.
With Nautilus you can:
-search tables without tipying the exact name.
-browse records, filter and locate records
-"Pivot" records to see it's related records (folowing the Foreign keys).
-Generate scripts: create table, insert into, delete, update.
-Build dynamic diagrams.
and many more features.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/nautilus/
Thanks, Marcos.
OMNI GROUPJoin Bytes!T-SQL/ CONTRACT TO PERM/ ATLANTAI'm looking for 1-2 TSQL developers for a 4 month contract to hirerole in Atlanta, GA. Ideally the candidate would be local or regional and aUS Citizen with 2-4 years of Microsoft TSQL development experience.Salary in the $55,000--$60,000 or so. annual range. Contract rate would beApproximately $36 hr W2 or 39hr 1099. One is responsible for their ownexpenses.Once perm, the company offers full benefits.If interested and qualified, answer the six questions below. EmailanswersWITH a resume to: Join Bytes!1. TSQL experience-------------------yrs2. MS SQL experience---------------yrs3. OO Languages----------------------4. Citizenship Status------------------5. Availability--------------------------6. Contract Rate ---------------pr hr..
View 1 Replies View Relatedwhere can i find pay rates or salaries for ssis developers?
thanks in advance.
New to SQL so please be patient. I'd like to give my developers "See All/Do Nothing" rights to my production server. I want them be able to see everyting that I do, as SA, but not be able to change anything. Is this possible?
Thanks for the help...Art
I will have a group of developers creating objects in a database. Currently they all
create them with the SA account. I would like to have them mapped to the dbo or some method
that when they create objects all objects are dbo.object name and not h1fed99.object name.
Is there a good methor or practice to handle this
I'm currently trying to obtain an aggregate function from a table to provide a cumulative monthly value. I would like to create a view to obtian this from the underlying table i.e month=1 ,month=1,2 , month=1,2,3 Etc.
month sales
1 10
2 0
3 20
month cummulative_sales
1 10
2 10
3 30
Anyone got any ideas ???
Always looking for people who are strong with microsoft technology for new oppurtunities in the Seattle area. If you are good, we can help you find your ideal next position.
don't be shy. shoot me an e-mail.
thanks
Pat Copeland
Hey,
I am looking for mid to senior level SQL developers for some sweet companies here in Seattle. A chance to work in a dynamic envirnoment with bleeding edge Microsoft technologies. Are you good? then we can help.
shoot me an e-mail.
patc@snowdogs.com
thanks
pat copeland
snowdogs
we are for the people.
I am looking for strong SQL developers and/or DBA's for some really sweet companies here in Seattle. Anyone interested that is good and wants to hear about new oppurtunities? I would love to help you out.
don't be shy just shoot me an e-mail.
This may be an intuitively obvious question, and if so, I apologize.
Speaking in terms of best practices here, what is the preferred method for allowing developers to work with databases in SQL Server? If they use Management Studio, then they have access to tools for perhaps messing with other databases, etc. that they should not (assuming it is not correctly secured). Likewise with Enterprise Manager. I can see where they would use Query Analyzer, but these two are now combined in Management Studio.
I'm just inquiring into how other DBA's do this. I realize there are DBA's that are developers and vice-versa, but what if there is a clear line of distinction and you want to keep the tools used in these roles separate?
Thanks in advance.
Kevin
Are you new to SQL Server 2005? http://aspalliance.com/1455 These are the frequently asked questions in SQL Server 2005. Let me know your comments.
Uday Denduluri
Software Engineer
Refer my articles at http://aspalliance.com/author.aspx?uId=62740
Hi,I have just started a business and I was wondering if I could get someadvice about product selection. I am currently buiding my websiteusing asp.net connecting to sql server database.My question: Am I only required to purchase a SQL Server DevelopersLicence? I won't be hosting the site so I think this is correct butthought I should check.Cheers,Jack
View 1 Replies View RelatedI just bought a copy of SQL Server 2000 (with service pack 3a) that Iintended to install and run on XP Pro. My concern is that the requirementslist on the box do not include XP or XP Pro. Will SQL Server 2000 developeredition run on XP Pro?
View 3 Replies View RelatedHi Everyone,
Were looking from some feedback, thoughts, comments, suggestions on a permissions issue in our SQL Server 2005 environment. We have a Development (stand-alone server) and Production (activepassive cluster). Both running SP2. We're looking for the best way to manage permissions for the developers without giving them dbo privileges.
As background information, here's a note / response from a developer outlining the permission they need.
-----------------------------------------
"Our team needs enough permissions on DB database to:
Create and modify DB object such as tables, stored procedures, keys, triggers, views, ...
Be able to execute stored procedures and other basic DB objects
One of the issue I had when working on DatabaseA which was never resolved was that I could create tables, but had no rights to modify them once created.
I could modify them via scripts, but not via graphical interface which is a pain.
I think we should have full permissions to dev DB other than to drop DB, and modify system DB settings.
So that we can work within the created DB shell completely."
-----------------------------------------
Previous to supporting the current SQL Server 2005 environment, the developersapp owners had db_owner for their databases. Definitely not a best practice as with 2005 db_owner is ablke to delete databases. Moving away from this, we thought we would scale them back and only grant them the following database roles:
db_datareader
db_datawriter
db_ddladmin
With these roles, they were able to create the tables, views, stored procedures, etc...... but problems arose when they tried to modify the objects they created as well as execute stored procedures. It's going to be a pain to grant permissions on each stored procedure. More of a mystery is allowing them to make design changes within Studio Manager. Given they can already do this using scripts but not the GUI.
So there is an issue with using GUI tools to design the tables.
Here's a thread we found that tries to explain the reason why they can't use the GUI to make design changes.
Even if you have CREATE TABLE permission, there are limitations to the modifications you can make. Remember, as you modify an existing table or design a new one, your work can induce attendant modifications in other tables. For example, if you change the data type of a foreign-key column, the corresponding column in the primary-key table will be automatically modified by the Visual Database Tools. If you do not own the primary-key table, and you are not logged in as the system administrator, database owner, or a user that is a member of the db_owner role, your modification will fail.
When we created the accounts, we assigned the default schema to be 'dbo'. This was thought to simplify administration of the objects. In SQL Server 2000, this was a best practice. Now, in SQL Server 2005, they changed everything with the user schema separation.
So we have a developer (devuser) - created with default schema (dbo). Any object that are being created are owned by dbo. (ie... dbo.table1, dbo.storedproc1, etc..) So dbo owns the objects, not the user.
Does anyone have any ideas? Do we create a new schema and assign permissions? Do we create a new fixed database role for the developers? I'm curious as to how others are assigning permissions to developers on development and production servers.
Thanks,
Rob
What is the best practice in managing an SSIS development with multiple developers.
For example, we have 2 guys that will be developing various SSIS packages for a common data warehouse. We are most likely going to divide up the unit of work by the tables that need to get loaded. So, one guy will develop packages to load tables 1 thru 5 and the other guy will develop packages to load tables 6 thru 10.
Should each person work within his own project? (Not sure what a difference between a solution and a project is, so I may be thinking of a solution.) If so, can multiple people open the same project? I don't think you can.
I'm very new to SSIS and this would be the first time I'm doing something like this. I haven't even deployed a package to the server yet so I'm not even sure what implications/consideration I have before I take on this development effort I'm about to.
Does SQL Server 2005 Developers Edition come with Visual Studio Pro 2008? I know it did with Visual Studio Pro 2005.
If not, if I purchase SQL Server 2005 Developers Edition, can I install on the same machine as VS Pro 2008?
Will there be a Developer's edition to SQL Server 2008?
I realize I can't put databases I build into production with just the developer edition.
thanks
james
Is it possible to use SQL express to create a web application that is developed by more than one user? It seems to be registered on the <machinename>/SQLEXPRESS but the ASP.NET tool in visual studio seems to always want to create a sql express version in its app_data folder.
How can i set up a database such that 2 or more people can use that for developing the application. No doubt that SQL express with be suitable eventually, but initially we need to access the same database for development, but be on multiple machines. Can this be done, if so how?