Example Of Stored Proc Conflict Resolver?
Oct 2, 2006
Hi all,
I need to write a custom conflict resolver for an application using merge replication. It's relatively simple logic - compare the two rows from the publisher and the subscriber and the winner is based on the value of one particular column.
Reading BOL gives me the input parameter list for the sp, and specifies that the output should be exactly the winning row. What is doesn't give is any example of how to do this, in particular how to access the two rows in conflict so that they can be compared.
I can do this by dynamically building SELECT statements, one connecting to the table locally on the publisher and another connecting to the subscriber using the form SERVER.DATABASE.OWNER.TABLE, but this requires me to explicitly have the subscriber as a linked server to do this. An example of my revolting code is appended to this post.
Is this what I have to do, or is there some table I can access on the publisher that has the conflicting rows in so I can compare them without going back to the subscriber?
Thanks for your help
Richard
---- code sample --
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[prRep_ResolveInventoryConflicts]
@tableowner sysname, @tablename sysname, @rowguid uniqueidentifier,
@subscriber sysname, @subscriber_db sysname,
@log_conflict int OUTPUT, @conflict_message nvarchar(512) OUTPUT,
@destination_owner sysname
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @qrySubscriber varchar(255)
DECLARE @qryPublisher varchar(255)
DECLARE @Publisher sysname
DECLARE @RecentCheck datetime
-- Temp table with same form as tbl_Inventory
CREATE TABLE #ConflictingRows (
[Machine] [sysname]NOT NULL,
[LocationID] [int] NOT NULL,
[PartGUID] [uniqueidentifier] NOT NULL,
[Qty] [int] NOT NULL ,
[LastUpdatedDtm] [datetime] NOT NULL,
[LastUpdatedUser] [varchar](50) NOT NULL ,
[rowguid] [uniqueidentifier] NOT NULL
)
-- Build the T-SQL To run against publisher and subscriber
SET @Publisher = @@Servername
SET @qryPublisher =
'INSERT INTO #ConflictingRows
SELECT '+@Publisher+' as Machine, * FROM '+@tableowner+'.'+@tablename+
'WHERE rowguid = '+CAST(@rowguid as varchar(40)) +';'
SET @qrySubscriber =
'INSERT INTO #ConflictingRows
SELECT '+@subscriber+ ' AS Machine, * FROM '+@subscriber+'.'+@subscriber_db+'.'+@tableowner+'.'+@tablename+
'WHERE rowguid = ' + CAST(@rowguid as varchar(40)) +';'
-- execute the stored procedures
EXECUTE @qryPublisher;
EXECUTE @qrySubscriber;
-- Compare the two rows and return the winning row, ie the one that was last updated by a human checking the inventory
SELECT @RecentCheck = MAX(LastUpdatedDtm) FROM #ConflictingRows
SELECT TOP 1 * FROM #ConflictingRows where LastUpdatedDtm=@RecentCheck;
-- Cleanup and exit
DROP TABLE #ConflictingRows
END
----
View 11 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
May 17, 2007
I created a stored procedure based custom conflict resolver in SQL 2005, I return the winning result set and also save that result set to a test table to compare the values. The values saved to the test table are correct but some of the values saved as the conflict winter are truncated.
Example a char(3) filed is updated at the subscriber as €˜111€™ and updated at the publisher as €˜222€™, in my custom conflict resolver if I use the value from the subscriber the conflict resolver updates the field as €™11 €˜, if I use the publisher value the conflict resolver updates the field as €™22 €˜. Now the same records is saved to the test table correctly as either €˜111€™ or €˜222€™ depending on the logic I used. So the result set has the correct values, its after the custom conflict resolver is called where the values is somehow truncated. Has anybody run into this before and what steps can I take to avoid this.
Thank you,
Pauly C
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 26, 2006
Hi there,
I have created a custom conflict resolver for an article that is using Merge replication. I can register my custom resolver OK, I can change my merge article to use my new custom resolver, but when a conflict occures the replication monitor shows the following errors:
Error messages:
No signature was present in the subject.
(Source: MSSQL_REPL, Error number: MSSQL_REPL-2146762496)
Get help: http://help/MSSQL_REPL-2146762496
The Custom Resolver Component for article 'BRANCH' does not have a valid digital signature. (Source: MSSQL_REPL, Error number: MSSQL_REPL-2147198713)
Get help: http://help/MSSQL_REPL-2147198713
At first I thought it was because my assembly wasn't signed, so I signed it. I still get the same error.
I have various debug statements in the assembly and I can see that Initialize and HandleChangeStates gets called ok, but no other overrides.
Can anyone help me please?
Thanks
Graham
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 18, 2007
Hi Everyone!
Here another post on replication.
When conflict occur, I want the user to be able to select witch row to keep and witch to delete.
I've look for system stored procedure, that could help me do the resolution but I've founded nothing.
So I've thought that I could do it by hand, with UPDATE/DELETE query
Take the row in the %TABLE_NAME%_Conflict table and copy it into the real table, than delete the row.
I this the good way of doing it?
Is there any other way?
Thanks !
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 6, 2006
Hello,
I'm trying to setup the Interactive Conflict Resolver in my C# app via RMO. (using SQL Server 2005)
The only article I can find on MSDN or anywhere is involing T-SQL. Can someone please shed some light on this for me specificaly on the subscriber side.
Thank you! Chris
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 20, 2005
Hi, I'm replicating a database between two instances of Sql 2000 using Merge Replication. I have no custom resolvers at present but I'm seeing something unexpected.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 5, 2006
Hi!
I'm trying to create a custom conflict resolver for SQL Server 2000 in
C# but i can't seem to find any source code examples of a *.dll where i
can actually see what needs to be done.
Any help is welcome.
Thanks
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 21, 2006
Hi everyone,
I am working on a COM-based custom conflict resolver (vb.net) for a merge replication problem that I am having. This is what I am trying to accomplish. 1. Have a Last_Upd_Dt column. 2. When there is a conflict between publisher and subscriber on a column, the winner is the most recent date in Last_Upd_Dt and want the value for that column from that source. 3. If there is no conflict on a column and the column was updated by either the publisher or subscriber, I want to keep the change made by the publisher or the subscriber. (i.e publisher made change in col #1, subscriber made change in col #2, no conflict, the resulting row will now have the col #1 value from publisher, col # 2 will have value from subscriber. Essentially merging the changes.)
Does anyone have any examples of a COM-based Conflict Resolver that implements ICustomResolver for SQL Server 2005? Can this be done using the Business Logic Handler (examples?) ?
TIA
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2006
Hello,
I see that MS has a conflict viewer that can be accessed by managment studio, however I would like to create one with some customized options. Is there a sample of code somewhere to start this? I could really find anything in BOL. Thanks in advance.
John
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 4, 2015
I have been evaluating merge replication, 'push' subscription on SQL Server 2014. If the default resolver is used (I refer to @article_resolver parameter of sp_addmergearticle), all seems to work as expected. However if I use "Microsoft SQL Server Subscriber Always Wins Conflict Resolver" (or any other MS standard resolver for that matter), if the Subscriber is on a different machine, the merge agent invariably gives the following error: "The process could not initialize <resolver_name>. Verify that the component is registered correctly."
This does not happen if the Subscriber is on the same machine as the Publisher and Distributor.
The problem seemed to exist in SQL Server 2008 according to some posts but it has been apparently fixed since then. I've tried the following:
- @partition_options = 0, as was suggested somewhere.
- Copied ssrpub.dll (the resolver dll) to the Subscriber machine (should not really matter as this is 'push' subscription?)
- Registered ssrpub.dll with regsvr32 on the Publisher/Distributor machine.
I've also run sp_enumcustomresolvers on the Publisher machine, and it happily showed all standard resolver, including the "Microsoft SQL Server Subscriber Always Wins Conflict Resolver".
Another thought is, I'm using SQL Server Express as the Subscriber (on the remote machine). Perhaps it does not support custom resolvers? (I'm using the full SQL Server in the 'local subscriber' variant, which does work OK as I mentioned before).
Note also that if I create a new publication via SSMS, the Resolver tab of the Article Properties dialog is empty, i.e. it does not list any resolver. The same tab contains the full list of resolvers though, if opened for an existing publication.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 12, 2007
I am using SQL 2005 build 9.0.2227
I have a custom conflict resolver - which fires on update conflicts (using row level tracking)
I have had a couple of occasions when the resolver has failed with the following error:
"The schema of the custom Dataset object implemented in the business logic handler does not match the schema of the source Dataset object. Verify that the custom Dataset object has been correctly defined"
In both cases I found that the row for which a conflict was being handled was not a conflict at all. One was a straightforward non conflicting update at the publisher and the other was a similar update at the subscriber.
I got round the problem by temporarily using a fix version of the conflict resolver dll that either set the custom Dataset to the publisher dataset or the subscriber dataset - depending on where the update had occurred.
When the first error (publisher update) occurred - the resolver code was basing the custom dataset on the publisher dataset - which was presumably empty - so I changed the code to base the custom dataset on the subscriber dataset. The second error therefore occurred when the custom dataset was based on the subscriber dataset - which again was presumably empty
Note that the tables involved in each occasion were different and neither table is filtered.
Is there a known bug in this area?
I am considering trying to change the resolver code to identify false conflicts in order to workround the problem - but this would be difficult to test as I can't reproduce the problem
aero1
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2008
I am working with a large application and am trying to track down a bug. I believe an error that occurs in the stored procedure isbubbling back up to the application and is causing the application not to run. Don't ask why, but we do not have some of the sourcecode that was used to build the application, so I am not able to trace into the code.
So basically I want to examine the stored procedure. If I run the stored procedure through Query Analyzer, I get the following error message:
Msg 2758, Level 16, State 1, Procedure GetPortalSettings, Line 74RAISERROR could not locate entry for error 60002 in sysmessages.
(1 row(s) affected)
(1 row(s) affected)
I don't know if the error message is sufficient enough to cause the application from not running? Does anyone know? If the RAISERROR occursmdiway through the stored procedure, does the stored procedure terminate execution?
Also, Is there a way to trace into a stored procedure through Query Analyzer?
-------------------------------------------As a side note, below is a small portion of my stored proc where the error is being raised:
SELECT @PortalPermissionValue = isnull(max(PermissionValue),0)FROM Permission, PermissionType, #GroupsWHERE Permission.ResourceId = @PortalIdAND Permission.PartyId = #Groups.PartyIdAND Permission.PermissionTypeId = PermissionType.PermissionTypeId
IF @PortalPermissionValue = 0BEGIN RAISERROR (60002, 16, 1) return -3END
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 24, 2006
I am having trouble executing a stored procedure on a remote server. On my
local server, I have a linked server setup as follows:
Server1.abcd.myserver.comSQLServer2005,1563
This works fine on my local server:
Select * From [Server1.abcd.myserver.comSQLServer2005,1563].DatabaseName.dbo.TableName
This does not work (Attempting to execute a remote stored proc named 'Data_Add':
Exec [Server1.abcd.myserver.comSQLServer2005,1563].DatabaseName.Data_Add 1,'Hello Moto'
When I attempt to run the above, I get the following error:
Could not locate entry in sysdatabases for database 'Server1.abcd.myserver.comSQLServer2005,1563'.
No entry found with that name. Make sure that the name is entered correctly.
Could anyone shed some light on what I need to do to get this to work?
Thanks - Amos.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 15, 2006
Hi All,Quick question, I have always heard it best practice to check for exist, ifso, drop, then create the proc. I just wanted to know why that's a bestpractice. I am trying to put that theory in place at my work, but they areasking for a good reason to do this before actually implementing. All Icould think of was that so when you're creating a proc you won't get anerror if the procedure already exists, but doesn't it also have to do withCompilation and perhaps Execution. Does anyone have a good argument fordoing stored procs this way? All feedback is appreciated.TIA,~CK
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 23, 2007
I have an ASP that has been working fine for several months, but itsuddenly broke. I wonder if windows update has installed some securitypatch that is causing it.The problem is that I am calling a stored procedure via an ASP(classic, not .NET) , but nothing happens. The procedure doesn't work,and I don't get any error messages.I've tried dropping and re-creating the user and permissions, to noavail. If it was a permissions problem, there would be an errormessage. I trace the calls in Profiler, and it has no complaints. Thedatabase is getting the stored proc call.I finally got it to work again, but this is not a viable solution forour production environment:1. response.write the SQL call to the stored procedure from the ASPand copy the text to the clipboard.2. log in to QueryAnalyzer using the same user as used by the ASP.3. paste and run the SQL call to the stored proc in query analyzer.After I have done this, it not only works in Query Analyzer, but thenthe ASP works too. It continues to work, even after I reboot themachine. This is truly bizzare and has us stumped. My hunch is thatwindows update installed something that has created this issue, but Ihave not been able to track it down.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 20, 2003
I have seen this done by viewing code done by a SQL expert and would like to learn this myself. Does anyone have any examples that might help.
I guess I should state my question to the forum !
Is there a way to call a stored proc from within another stored proc?
Thanks In Advance.
Tony
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 13, 2006
Hi all,
I have a stored procedure "uspX" that calls another stored procedure "uspY" and I need to retrieve the return value from uspY and use it within uspX. Does anyone know the syntax for this?
Thanks for your help!
Cat
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 20, 2004
Hi all
I have about 5 stored procedures that, among other things, execute exactly the same SELECT statement
Instead of copying the SELECT statement 5 times, I'd like each stored proc to call a single stored proc that executes the SELECT statement and returns the resultset to the calling stored proc
The SELECT statement in question retrieves a single row from a table containing 10 columns.
Is there a way for a stored proc to call another stored proc and gain access to the resultset of the called stored proc?
I know about stored proc return values and about output parameters, but I think I am looking for something different.
Thanks
View 14 Replies
View Related
Aug 30, 2007
I would like to know if the following is possible/permissible:
myCLRstoredproc (or some C# stored proc)
{
//call some T SQL stored procedure spSQL and get the result set here to work with
INSERT INTO #tmpCLR EXECUTE spSQL
}
spSQL
(
INSERT INTO #tmpABC EXECUTE spSQL2
)
spSQL2
(
// some other t-sql stored proc
)
Can we do that? I know that doing this in SQL server would throw (nested EXECUTE not allowed). I dont want to go re-writing the spSQL in C# again, I just want to get whatever spSQL returns and then work with the result set to do row-level computations, thereby avoiding to use cursors in spSQL.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2007
For my ASP.net Application on a hosted MSSQL server, i have had to re-ceate using the scripts generated from my local machine using sql tools with SSMSE. This worked beautifully and all appears to work. My ASP.net application users can create their accounts and login normally. Unfortunately, my create user wizard does not automatically generate roles for the clients. So, i am using a routine that includes the following Protected Sub CreateWizard1_OnUserCrated(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles CreateUserWizard1.CreatedUser Dim userInfo As MembershipUser = Membership.GetUser(CreateUserWizard1.UserName) userInfo.IsApproved = False Membership.UpdateUser(userInfo) Roles.AddUserToRole(CreateUserWizard1.UserName, "Friends") End Sub which does not work because it is looking for a AddUserToRole stored procedure. This is confusing because it this SP IS on my local version and works fine. So i attemtped to create a new SP called AddUserToRole on the server but get an error message Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Procedure aspnet_UsersInRoles_AddUsersToRoles, Line 49 Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Latin1_General_CI_AS" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation. (actually it occurs 5 times in the routine). Further research from the various SQL forums and even MSDN points the problem as one of Collation versions - and suggest the answer is to re-install. I was wondering if any might know of a way of changing the collation version . Loking at db properties on my server db has the collation version set to SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS. I do not understand enough about sql to know if changing the version the Stored Procedure wants to use as its default ( which appears to be Latin1_General_CI_AS). ANY IDEAS????? As i have already deleted and re-installed my mssql db, i would rather find an alternative / better solution. many thanks in anticipation. steve
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 4, 2006
We have merge replication running with anamous subscribers
We have generested lots of views tables and stored procedures like
sp_ins_C435D35DDEC04FE2517CCD52A9024EC4
ctsv_07BA7383A12B4654B4D3A69B3053B227
aonflict_DH_tblReplicationRegion
How do we get rud of these I am concerned it will fill up the publisher database
Can any one advise
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 14, 2007
I am calling a stored procedure (say X) and from that stored procedure (i mean X) i want to call another stored procedure (say Y)asynchoronoulsy. Once stored procedure X is completed then i want to return execution to main program. In background, Stored procedure Y will contiue his work. Please let me know how to do that using SQL Server 2000 and ASP.NET 2.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 23, 2008
Hello friends......How are you ? I want to ask you all that how can I do the following ?
I want to now that how many ways are there to do this ?
How can I call one or more stored procedures into perticular one Stored Proc ? in MS SQL Server 2000/05.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 18, 2007
Hi Peeps
I have a SP that returns xml
I have writen another stored proc in which I want to do something like this:Select FieldOne, FieldTwo, ( exec sp_that_returns_xml ( @a, @b) ), FieldThree from TableName
But it seems that I cant call the proc from within a select.
I have also tried
declare @v xml
set @v = exec sp_that_returns_xml ( @a, @b)
But this again doesn't work
I have tried changing the statements syntax i.e. brackets and no brackets etc...,
The only way Ive got it to work is to create a temp table, insert the result from the xml proc into it and then set @v as a select from the temp table -
Which to be frank is god awful way to do it.
Any and all help appreciated.
Kal
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 18, 2006
Hi all sql guru's
I'm having this problem for a while now and can't find any solid answer on the net for it.
I have 2 server in diffrent location ( +- 1200k's) away from eachother. When the msmerge agent run it return the following error and return the status as successfull with the following error information:
(The colum information specified for the MS SQL Server maximum conflict resolver) Resolver is either missing or incorrect. I've change every single article to "Latest chagne wins". Any suggestion. I happend when the power failed and the server got restarted.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 26, 2007
Hi all,
here is the context of our problem:
- Publisher : version SQL Server 2005 SP2, table in SQL Server 2000 (80) compatibility level, publication in SQL Server 2000 compatibility level
- Distributor : SQL Server 2005 SP2
- Subscriber : SQL Server 2000 SP4 + hotfixes (version 8.00.2187)
There is only one article in our publication (a simple table with a GUID and a nvarchar(50) columns), and we have left the default resolver.
1 - The first synchronization of the subscription is successfully completed, and it is the same for the different updates/inserts/deletes or conflicts.
2 - Then we change the Resolver of our article by our own COM-Based Custom Resolver (developped in C# 2.0). This resolver only change the default behaviour: the subscriber always win (this is for a test, in the future we will have a complex business logic). All the synchronizations works fine and do what we want in the conflicts.
3 - We rollback the resolver to the default one... and here is the problem!
The synchonizations stop to work correctly. For all of them we've got the same error:
quote:Replprov.dll , 2007/09/25 14:26:07.591, 4000, 16890, S1, ERROR: ErrNo = 0x80045017, ErrSrc = <null>, ErrType = 8, ErrStr = The schema script '
declare @cmd nvarchar(1000)
set @cmd='exec sys.sp_MSchangearticleresolver @article_resolver=@ar, @resolver_clsid=@rc, @artid=@ai, @resolver_info=@ri'
exec dbo.sp_executesql @cmd, N'@ar> nvarchar(255),@rc nvarchar(40),@ai uniqueidentifie..." mailto:N?@ar">N'@armailto:N'@ar">N'@ar</A< A>> nvarchar(255),@rc nvarchar(40),@ai uniqueidentifie...
It is no more possible to synchronize this subscription... Any remark will be helpfull cause we did not find anything on the net concerning this error.
Thanks a lot!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 7, 2006
Hi there!
I'm trying to create a custom resolver for merge replication exactly like in the MS example.
It seems to work, but only ONE time. If I change, insert or delete a
record in a table the second time, the subscriber monitor comes with
the following errors:
Error messages:
Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an
indication that other memory is corrupt. (Source: MSSQL_REPL, Error
number: MSSQL_REPL-2147199411)
The Merge Agent encountered an error when executing code in the
'UpdateHandler' method implemented in the business logic handler
'D:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90COMMyResolver.dll'. Ensure
that the overridden 'UpdateHandler' method has been properly
implemented in the business logic handler. (Source: MSSQL_REPL,
Error number: MSSQL_REPL-2147199411)
This last error is of course dependant on my action (update, delete, insert).
My code is -exactly- like the example (I just stripped out the log message).
Does anyone know why I am "trying to read or write protected memory" ?
The thing is that I'm trying to create an application that detects if a
table changes. Is this the right way to do this anyway or are there
better solutions?
Any help is appreciated! Thanks!
View 13 Replies
View Related
Jan 22, 2007
Hi,
I have created a custom resolver in VB .net (VS2005). The resolver works ( Both Publisher and Subscriber are SQL 2005 ), but I need to be able to debug the code within the resolver. How do I do this? I have tried a number of things without success.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Cheers
Neil
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 23, 2007
When you create a Stored procedure, is it automatically stored under the default Filegoup?
How can I see under which Filegroup my Stored Procedures and Triggers are stored?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 10, 2005
I didn't want to maintain similar/identical tables in a legacy FoxPro system and another system with SQL Server back end. Both systems are active, but some tables are shared.
Initially I was going to use a Linked Server to the FoxPro to pull the FP data when needed. This works. But, I've come up with what I believe is a better solution. Keep in mind that these tables are largely static - occassional changes, edits.
I will do a 1 time DTS from FP into SQL Server tables.
I then create INSERT and UPDATE triggers within FoxPro.
These triggers fire a stored procedure in FoxPro that establishes a connection to the SQL Server and fire the appropriate stored procedure on SQL Server to CREATE and/or UPDATE the corresponding table there.
In the end - the tables are local to both apps.
If the UPDATES or TRIGGERS fail I write to an error log - and in that rare case - I can manually fix. I could set it up to email me from within FoxPro as well if needed.
Here's the FoxPro and SQL Server code for reference for the Record Insert:
FOXPRO employee.dbf InsertTrigger:
employee_insert_trigger(VAL(Employee.ep_pk),Employ ee.fname,Employee.lname,Employee.email,Employee.us er_login,Employee.phone)
FOXPRO corresponding Stored Procedure:
FUNCTION EMPLOYEE_INSERT_TRIGGER
PARAMETERS wepk,wefname,welname,weemail,WEUSERID,WEPHONE
nhandle=SQLCONNECT('SS_PDITHP3','userid','password ')
IF nhandle<0
m.errclose=.f.
IF !USED("errorlog")
USE tisdata!errorlog IN SELECT(1)
m.errclose=.t.
ENDIF
SELECT errorlog
INSERT INTO errorlog (date, time, program,source,user) ;
values (DATE(), TIME(), 'EMPLOYEE_INSERT_TRIGGER','nhandle<0 PARAMS: '+STR(wepk)+wefname+welname+weemail+WEUSERID+WEPHO NE,GETENV("username"))
IF m.errclose
USE IN errorlog
ENDIF
RETURN
ENDIF
nquery="exec ewo_sp_insertNewEmployee @WEPK ="+STR(wepk)+",@WEFNAME ='"+wefname+"',@WELNAME ='"+welname+"',@WEEMAIL ='"+weemail+"',@WEUSERID ='"+weuserid+"',@WEPHONE='"+wephone+"',@RETCODE =0"
nsucc=SQLEXEC(nhandle,nquery)
SQLDISCONNECT(nhandle)
IF nSucc<0
m.errclose=.f.
IF !USED("errorlog")
USE tisdata!errorlog IN SELECT(1)
m.errclose=.t.
ENDIF
SELECT errorlog
INSERT INTO errorlog (date, time, program,source,user) ;
values (DATE(), TIME(), 'EMPLOYEE_INSERT_TRIGGER','nSucc<0 PARAMS: '+STR(wepk)+wefname+welname+weemail+WEUSERID+WEPHO NE,GETENV("username"))
IF m.errclose
USE IN errorlog
ENDIF
ENDIF
RETURN
SQL SERVER Stored Procedure called from FOXPRO Stored Procedure
CREATE procedure ewo_sp_insertNewEmployee (
@WEPK int,
@WEFNAME char(20),
@WELNAME char(20),
@WEEMAIL char(50),
@WEUSERID char(15),
@WEPHONE char(25),
@RETCODE int OUTPUT
)
AS
insert into WO_EMP (
WE_PK,
WE_FNAME,
WE_LNAME,
WE_EMAIL,
WE_USERID,
WE_PHONE
)
VALUES (
@WEPK,
@WEFNAME,
@WELNAME,
@WEEMAIL,
@WEUSERID,
@WEPHONE
)
IF @@ERROR <> 0
BEGIN
SET @RETCODE=@@ERROR
END
ELSE
BEGIN
-- SUCCESS!!
SET @RETCODE=0
END
return @RETCODE
GO
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 19, 2007
Im trying to perform an update with a stored procedure thats all working but
an exception is thrown ....violation of primary key contraint....cannot insert duplicate pri key
I understand whats going on but how do you update some ones details if its protected this way.
?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 22, 2008
I have a stored procedure , where i want to return identity column after insert but before insert i want to check if the record exist then select its identity value to return , after select statement it is retutrning null CREATE PROCEDURE SP_Attendance1 (@DIVISIONID int,@EMPLOYEEID int,@CALLDATE datetime,@RECEIVEDDATE datetime,@DOC datetime,@SYSTEMNAME VARCHAR(20),@DELETED int,@attendanceID int output) AS---DECLARE @ID intIF EXISTS (SELECT ID FROM TBLATTENDANCE WHERE EMPLOYEEID = @EMPLOYEEID AND YEAR ( CALLDATE ) = YEAR ( @CALLDATE)AND MONTH (CALLDATE) = MONTH ( @CALLDATE) AND DAY (CALLDATE) = DAY ( @CALLDATE) )BEGIN SET @attendanceID = SCOPE_IDENTITY()END ELSE BEGIN INSERT INTO TBLATTENDANCE (DIVISIONID ,EMPLOYEEID ,CALLDATE , RECEIVEDDATE ,DOC,SYSTEMNAME ,DELETED )VALUES (@DIVISIONID ,@EMPLOYEEID ,@CALLDATE , @RECEIVEDDATE ,@DOC,@SYSTEMNAME ,@DELETED ) ;SELECT DIVISIONID, EMPLOYEEID, CALLDATE, RECEIVEDDATE, DOC, SYSTEMNAME, DELETED,ID FROM TBLATTENDANCE WHERE (ID = SCOPE_IDENTITY())SELECT @attendanceID = SCOPE_IDENTITY()ENDGO Kindly help with this
View 5 Replies
View Related