I was racking my brains trying to figure out why SomeCommand.ExecuteNonQuery() was not returning any rows...
SQL Server 2005 likes to put the SET NOCOUNT ON statement in every stored procedure you write. By hiding the count of records touched by your query, you also disable the results to be consumed by your application.
So I don't recommend using this statement for your stored procedures and ASP.NET applications, as this functionality is fairly critical for error trapping.
When I use ExecuteNonQuery() with the stored procedure below it returns -1. However, when i tried to get rid of the if/else statements and just leave one insert statement for testing purposes, ExecuteNonQuery() returns the correct affected rows which is 1. So it seems like ExecuteNonQuery() doesn't work when the INSERT statement is inside the IF..ELSE. Can anybody help me with this problem? I haven't tried using @@RowCount because I really want to use ExecuteNonQuery() to do this because I don't want to rewrite my DAL. Thanks in advance -- With if/else ExecuteNonQuery returns -1ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[SP_AddObjectContribution] @ObjectId int, @FanId int, @DateContributed DateTime, @Notes nvarchar(512), @ObjectType intASBEGIN BEGIN TRAN IF @ObjectType = 2 BEGIN INSERT INTO FighterContributions (FighterId, FanId, DateContributed, Notes) VALUES (@ObjectId, @FanId, @DateContributed, @Notes) END ELSE IF @ObjectType = 3 BEGIN INSERT INTO FighterPhotoContributions (FighterPhotoId, FanId, DateContributed, Notes) VALUES (@ObjectId, @FanId, @DateContributed, @Notes) END ELSE IF @ObjectType = 4 BEGIN INSERT INTO OrganizationContributions (OrganizationId, FanId, DateContributed, Notes) VALUES (@ObjectId, @FanId, @DateContributed, @Notes) END ELSE IF @ObjectType = 5 BEGIN INSERT INTO EventContributions (EventId, FanId, DateContributed, Notes) VALUES (@ObjectId, @FanId, @DateContributed, @Notes) END ELSE IF @ObjectType = 6 BEGIN INSERT INTO FightContributions (FightId, FanId, DateContributed, Notes) VALUES (@ObjectId, @FanId, @DateContributed, @Notes) END ELSE IF @ObjectType = 7 BEGIN INSERT INTO FightPhotoContributions (FightPhotoId, FanId, DateContributed, Notes) VALUES (@ObjectId, @FanId, @DateContributed, @Notes) END IF @@ERROR <> 0 BEGIN ROLLBACK RETURN END COMMIT TRANEND -- Without if/else ExecuteNonQuery returns 1ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[SP_AddObjectContribution] @ObjectId int, @FanId int, @DateContributed DateTime, @Notes nvarchar(512), @ObjectType int AS
BEGIN
BEGIN TRAN INSERT INTO FighterContributions (FighterId, FanId, DateContributed, Notes) VALUES (@ObjectId, @FanId, @DateContributed, @Notes) IF @@ERROR <> 0 BEGIN ROLLBACK RETURN END
Hi, I'm using .net 2.0 and I have created a stored procedure (sql server DB) which has one insert statement with 2 input parameters. When I execute this stored procedure using ExecuteNonQuery(), it always returning -1. I want to know how many records are effected. I want to know if there is any error. Help appreciated.
For the following ADO Connection::Execute() function the "recAffected" is zero, after a successful insertion of data, in SQL Server 2005. In SQL Server Express I am getting the the number of records affected value correctly.
BEGIN DELETE FROM MyTable WHERE Column_1 IN ('abc', 'def' ) END BEGIN INSERT INTO MyTable (Column_1, Column_2, Cloumn_3 ) SELECT 'abc', 'data11', 'data12' UNION ALL SELECT 'def', 'data21', 'data22' END
But see this, for SQL Server 2005 "recAffected" has the correct value of 2 when I have just the insert statement.
INSERT INTO MyTable (Column_1, Column_2, Cloumn_3 ) SELECT 'abc', 'data11', 'data12' UNION ALL SELECT 'def', 'data21', 'data22'
For SQL Server 2005 in both cases the table got successfully inserted two rows and the HRESULT of Execute() function returns S_OK.
Does the Execute function has any problem with a statement like the first one (with delete and insert) on a SQL Server 2005 DB?
Why the "recAffected" has a value zero for the first SQL (with delete and insert) on a SQL Server 2005 DB? Do I need to pass any options to Execute() function for a SQL Server 2005 DB?
When connecting to SQL Server Express the "recAffected" has the correct values for any type of SQL statements.
Thank you for your time. Any help greatly appreciated.
For the following ADO Connection::Execute() function the "recAffected" is zero, after a successful insertion of data, in SQL Server 2005. In SQL Server Express I am getting the the number of records affected value correctly.
BEGIN DELETE FROM MyTable WHERE Column_1 IN ('abc', 'def' ) END BEGIN INSERT INTO MyTable (Column_1, Column_2, Cloumn_3 ) SELECT 'abc', 'data11', 'data12' UNION ALL SELECT 'def', 'data21', 'data22' END
But see this, for SQL Server 2005 "recAffected" has the correct value of 2 when I have just the insert statement.
INSERT INTO MyTable (Column_1, Column_2, Cloumn_3 ) SELECT 'abc', 'data11', 'data12' UNION ALL SELECT 'def', 'data21', 'data22'
For SQL Server 2005 in both cases the table got successfully inserted two rows and the HRESULT of Execute() function returns S_OK.
Does the Execute function has any problem with a statement like the first one (with delete and insert) on a SQL Server 2005 DB?
Why the "recAffected" has a value zero for the first SQL (with delete and insert) on a SQL Server 2005 DB? Do I need to pass any options to Execute() function for a SQL Server 2005 DB?
When connecting to SQL Server Express the "recAffected" has the correct values for any type of SQL statements.
Thank you for your time. Any help greatly appreciated.
I use business logic layer, TableAdapter(middle tier) and StoredProcedure(backend). In my stored procedure,I set as follows:set nocount offWhat and where should I do in order to get the rows affected count in the business logic layer(C#/VB code)?Thank you.
I'm doing an executenonquery() and the value I'm getting back is -1 This is confusing me, as sometimes the row has updated when I look at it in sql manager and then I look at it again and it seems to have reverted.Would it be possible to point me in the right direction for the cause and how to rectify / debug this issue. I'm using a stored procedure and I'm slightly uncertain how to check exactly what sql server has been told to insert ;) Thanks!
After executing a restore command. I got the following result. Anyone know why is displaying rows affected. I saw the executiong plan and it shows several execution plans? Its the first time i see it. Can anyone explain what is going on?
restore database test_GG_ATRECORDING_QAT2 from disk = 'f:a.bak' with move 'a' to 'f:MSSQL$INAQATdataa2.mdf', move 'a_log' to 'f:MSSQL$INAQATdataa2_log.LDF'
Processed 11016 pages for database 'test_GG_ATRECORDING_QAT2', file 'a' on file 1. Processed 1 pages for database 'test_GG_ATRECORDING_QAT2', file 'a_log' on file 1.
I am using a cursor to navigate on data...of a table.... inside the while @@fetch_status = 0 command I want to delete some rows from the table(temporary table) in order to not be processed... The problem is that I want this deletion to affect the rows the cursor has.
I have a database table where upon inserting a new record, I get 1 row(s) affected twice. But when deleting the record, I only get one instance of that message. I'm not really an expert, neither have I designed the database, but how can I retrieve the actual affected rows or determine what table does the other row pertain to?
My understanding from a previous thread was that ExecuteNonQuery() could be used to display the number of rows returned. Does this also work when calling stored procedures and passing parameters? I have code (shown) that perfectly calls and returns Distinct models downloaded by Country. Yet the rowCount variable displays a -1. What should I do?Dim myCommand As New SqlClient.SqlCommand myCommand.CommandText = "ap_Select_ModelRequests_RequestDateTime" myCommand.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@selectDate", dateEntered) myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@selectCountry", CInt(selectCountry)) myCommand.Connection = con con.Open() Dim rowCount As Integer = myCommand.ExecuteNonQuery() numberParts.Text = rowCount.ToString con.Close() Thank you.
I have a mixed mode account setup with exec permissions granted on my stored procedures. I am running an sp that is editing a member, and if i run it using my query analyzer with the same login, my sp writes to the db. however, if i'm calling it through my web app (asp.net) it doesn't. here is my sp code:
IF @@ERROR <> 0 BEGIN ROLLBACK TRAN END ELSE COMMIT TRAN GO --------------------------------------
on my app side- i've already ensured the datatypes match up and the sizes are all ok (except for member_id, the variable is an int and i pass it as a small_int- the number is ranging from 1000-10000).
I have a file which has some wind data that i am trying to import into a sql data base through bulk insert. if the script works as it supposed i should see 144 rows impacted but i see 0 rows affected.
BULK INSERT TOWER.RAWINTERFACE_1058 FROM 'C:Temp900020150427583.txt' WITH(CHECK_CONSTRAINTS,CODEPAGE='RAW',DATAFILETYPE='char',FIELDTERMINATOR=' ',ROWTERMINATOR=' ',FIRSTROW=172)
The code works if the file is large but if its small 0 rows are affected. and also if i remove the header rows then the file works again. want to understand what is going on here. i am including the screen shot of the file in notepad++. I have tried changing the row terminator to ' ' , ' ' and also tried to change the codepage but nothing seems to work. No error file is being generated either, if i give a error file option.
Hi, Using VS.NET 2008 Beta2, and SQL Server 2005. I have a gridview bound to a linq data source, and when trying to update a row, I get an exception that no rows were modified. The query generated is: UPDATE [dbo].[package] SET [owner_id] = @p5 WHERE ([package_id] = @p0) AND ([title] = @p1) AND ([directory] = @p2) AND ([owner_id] = @p3) AND ([creation_date] = @p4) -- @p0: Input Int32 (Size = 0; Prec = 0; Scale = 0) [20006] -- @p1: Input String (Size = 22; Prec = 0; Scale = 0) [Visual Studio.NET 2005] -- @p2: Input String (Size = 26; Prec = 0; Scale = 0) [MSI_Visual_Studio.NET_2005] -- @p3: Input Int32 (Size = 0; Prec = 0; Scale = 0) [10000] -- @p4: Input DateTime (Size = 0; Prec = 0; Scale = 0) [11/07/2007 12:00:00 a.m.] -- @p5: Input Int32 (Size = 0; Prec = 0; Scale = 0) [10001] -- Context: SqlProvider(Sql2005) Model: AttributedMetaModel Build: 3.5.20706.1
If I run it manually on sql server, it fails until the directory column is removed. The type is varchar(50), with a uniqueness constraint. However, this is same type as the title column, which doesn't have this problem. Thanks, Jessica
I am using SQLDMO to implement a tool to do basic management/script running for a MSDE database. The problem i am having is getting the number of rows affected from insert,update,delete statements. Help and MSDN seem to imply that this info is returned in a QueryResults object, but it is always empty unless the query is a select statement. I tried using ExecuteImmediate, ExecuteWithResults, and ExecuteWithResultsAndMessages methods and the info is not in any resultset, message, or property.
i read from help files that "For UPDATE, INSERT, and DELETE statements, the return value is the number of rows affected by the command. " Anyone know how to get the return value from the query below?
Below is the normal way i did in vb.net, but how to check for the return value. Please help.
======== Public Sub CreateMySqlCommand(myExecuteQuery As String, myConnection As SqlConnection) Dim myCommand As New SqlCommand(myExecuteQuery, myConnection) myCommand.Connection.Open() myCommand.ExecuteNonQuery() myConnection.Close() End Sub 'CreateMySqlCommand ========
I need to remove "rows affected" text from results as shown below from posted Sp. I am using set nocount on but its not working as expected.
Create Procedure DailyCheckList As SET NOCOUNT ON Declare @EmailSub varchar(500),@dt varchar(100),@Msg varchar(max),@M varchar(max) set @dt= convert(varchar(20),GETDATE(),107)
Hello. I was using the new sys.dm_db_index_operational_stats function which is nice for seeing counts of insert/update/delete actions per table index, bla bla bla... Anyways, question, can I do the same thing with Profiler? meaning, can I trace stored procs and sopmehow see the proc exec WITH each table it does actions against? Not talking about filtering on table names in the text, talking I just want to run an application, which uses all stored procs, and see every table used by that execution of the proc, and also the number of rows inserted,updated,deleted.... If so, which Profiler events/columns must I flick on to gather that? Thanks, Bruce
I need to run a select statement that only returns 50 rows. How do I limit the amount of rows returned? Normally the query will return hundreds of rows but all I need is the first 50 it retrieves. I have looked in the BOL and can only find help with a block cursor not just a query.
Is there a way to create a query that will return only 1 row within a join for example:
select a,b,c,d from tbl1 inner join tbl2 on top 1 tbl2.a = tbl1.a <-- return only the top record here...
I dont have too much of a problem with joins... however I was wondering if there was a mechanism to just specify what would be the top most record from a join clause.
I have a query set up that returns the data that I would like, but Iwould only like the latest data for each vehicle number. The query Ihave set up isSELECT TOP 100 PERCENT dbo.vwEvents.EventName,dbo.luSessionAll.SessionName, dbo.luOuting.OutingNumber,dbo.luVehicle.VehicleName, dbo.luOuting.OutingID,dbo.tblOutings.OutingStartTime,dbo.tblSessions.Ses sionDate,dbo.tblSessions.SessionStartTimeFROM dbo.vwSessions INNER JOIN dbo.vwEvents ONdbo.vwSessions.Event = dbo.vwEvents.EventIDINNER JOINdbo.luSessionAll ON dbo.vwEvents.EventID =dbo.luSessionAll.Event INNER JOINdbo.luOuting ON dbo.luSessionAll.SessionID =dbo.luOuting.SessionID INNER JOINdbo.luVehicle ON dbo.luSessionAll.Vehicle =dbo.luVehicle.VehicleID INNER JOINdbo.tblOutings ON dbo.luOuting.OutingID =dbo.tblOutings.OutingID INNER JOINdbo.tblSessions ON dbo.tblOutings.[Session] =dbo.tblSessions.SessionIDGROUP BY dbo.vwEvents.EventName, dbo.luSessionAll.SessionName,dbo.luOuting.OutingNumber, dbo.luVehicle.VehicleName,dbo.luOuting.OutingID, dbo.tblOutings.OutingStartTime,dbo.tblSessions.SessionStartTime, dbo.tblSessions.SessionDateORDER BY dbo.luVehicle.VehicleName, dbo.tblSessions.SessionDate,dbo.tblSessions.SessionStartTime, dbo.tblOutings.OutingStartTimethis returns all the outings. I would like the outing that has, inorder of importance, the latest session date, latest session time andlatest outing start time. Outing start time can sometimes be <<Null>>but the other two always have values. How would I go about doing this?thanks in advance for any help
I have a stored procedure below that returns a table of coaches. It worked before now it does not. It returns nothing, in vistual studio 2005 and on my asp.net webpage. But when I execute it in query analyzer with just SELECT * FROM Coaches it returns the rows. There is no error just will not return what I need. I recreated the database and stored procedure still doing the same thing. Any ideas? Would this be on my server hosting side? ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[GetCo]ASSELECT * FROM Coaches
Hi All: My below sub in application is returning only the Header Row instead of the relevant rows I guess therez problem in my "str" Syntax. However I fail to understand where exactly is it faultering. Private Sub btnSearch_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles btnSearch.Click Try con.Open()Dim empID As String = txtEmpID.Text Dim FName As String = txtFName.Text Dim LName As String = txtLName.TextDim str As String = "Select Emp_ID, Emp_FName,Emp_LName,Emp_Address1,Emp_HNo,Emp_MNo from Emp_Details where Emp_ID='" & empID & " ' Or Emp_LName='" & LName & " ' Or Emp_FName=' " & FName & "'"""Dim da1 As New SqlDataAdapter(str, con) da1.Fill(ds, "Emp_Details") dgEmp.DataSource = ds dgEmp.DataMember = "Emp_Details" dgEmp.DataBind() Finally con.Close() End Try End Sub
Thanks in Advance for your quick help. Regards, Brandy
TotalSelected.Value = SqlDataSource1.SelectCommand = "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM tblNews";
the reason i am tring to do this is so if i can find out the amount of rows before sqldatasource selects for details view then i can make the sqldataesource select depends on total minus 5 so e.g. if total 200 then - 5 so i can select bottom 195 so it misses top 5 for details view any1 any ideas? Thanks Andy,
This question has been posted on the site before but I could not find any resolution....I want to return rows 11 - 20 from a query that returns 100 records without using a cursor or temp table.
The closest query I have found is a query that numbers the rows, but I can't seem to use rownumber in a between clause...
Use Pubs SELECT emp_id, lname, fname, job_id, (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM employee e2 WHERE e2.emp_id <= e.emp_id AND e2.job_id = 10) AS rownumber FROM employee e WHERE job_id = 10 ORDER BY emp_id
I have two tables and I want to return data from both. Currently my select statement is returning just 1 child record for each parent record and I want to return all child records that match the parent record.
Say you have a table that contains 1000 rows, you create a simple select statement with a where clause that returns 100 or so of those rows. Easy enough.
Now, let's say that you wish to modify that select so that out of the 100 rows that match the where clause criteria, you only wish to return 10 rows randomly (i.e., you could run this query multiple times and get different results). How exactly would you go about doing this, efficiently?
I've thought about creating a stored procedure that will query the initial 100 rows into a temp table with an additional column (to number the rows from 1 to 100). Then setting up a loop (10 iterations) that will then generate a random number from 1 to 100 and select that row number into another temp table. At the end of the loop I'll have my table of randomly selected records. I am sure there is probably a better way to do this...
