Executing A Views From A Trigger
Mar 1, 2006
Hi,
I am new to using SQL. I want to be able to exucute a query that I
place in a view. I want this views to be executed every time a value
change in one of the table in a particular field. So my guess was to
use a trigger that will call the views every time the data change in
the selected table. Is this the proper way of doing thing? Should I
use other SQL tools to achive this. I search for exemple of trigger
executing views but did not found anything as of yet. Let's use this
dummy name for the exemple:
Database: DB1
Table: Tbl1
Special field in Tbl1: flag
Views name: views_01
Thank you.
Philippe
View 7 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jan 31, 2006
Hello,
can someone tell me where I can look to find a sql command that
is being executed by an application against my database?
In Oracle, I look in the v$sql_text view - is there something
similar in SQL Server 2000 ?
Many thanks in advance
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 6, 2000
VIEW behaviour depending on what operation is run on it.
VIEW syntax is CREATE VIEW xx AS SELECT ... It would be very convinient to know wether a select, update, insert or delete is the operation executed on it so the view could take action accordingly, ie
CREATE VIEW xxx AS SELECT ..
CASE UPDATE THEN do_this
CASE SELECT THEN do_that etc.
Does anyone know if this is possible?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 19, 2015
I have created a trigger on a table that get's too many updates so to analyze what records and what columns get updates I have coded a trigger that inserts into a table the record key and a flag on each column to let me know what is updates. Now that I am presenting the data to the developers I have been asked to provide the update / insert or delete statement
So on my trigger I have tried using dynamic management views but its returning the actual trigger code not the parent SQL Script that triggered it.
This is what I am using.
select@dDate as dDate, dest.[dbid], dest.[objectid], dest.[number], dest.[encrypted],
case when sder.[statement_start_offset] > 0 --the start of the active command is not at the beginning of the full command text
thencasesder.[statement_end_offset]
[Code] .....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 15, 2000
Dear All,
I would like to execute a DDL statement(create table) in a trigger. The DDL statement is stored as a field in another table. I have read that sql statement into a variable of type varchar. How do I execute that sql statement.
Thanks in advance
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 28, 2007
Hi Everybody,
I am new to ms sql server i had small proublem
i am created Trigger it will work so fine command successfully
how can i executed that Trigger plz help
Regards
subu
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 13, 2006
I will try to keep this as simple as possible and make a long story short. The college I work for has bought a third party package to basically run the operations of the school. There is a component for registration, admissions, billing, etc. It also has a web component so students can access their school information from anywhere. The backend for all of this is SQL Server. To make things easy, the vendor has provided us with the steps to bulk load users, via DTS, into the system and create their accounts for the web portion. The way this works is as follows:
I create a CSV file which I then load via DTS into their "Bulk Load" table. This table has an "on insert" trigger that fires off when the load happens on the "Bulk Load" table. The trigger verifies that the user exists in the system, encrypts the password I provide in the file and inserts the record into an "Accounts" table. This "Accounts" table is where the system checks when a user logs in. Everything works fine on our test server, but in live, the trigger does not execute. The DTS package executes and the "Bulk Load" table gets updated, but the "Accounts" table does not. My file has 382 valid students and again, it worked fine on the test server.
Differences between the servers:
1. The DTS packages are the same, except for the server they connect to.
2. The test server is stand alone, while the production server is clustered.
What I tried:
1. A ran the alter statement to enable the trigger thinking it might be disabled.
2. Dropped the trigger on production and re-created it with the trigger from our test server.
3. Tried to run a trace (I had never done that before). Noticed some sp's running, but none of them were sp's found in the trigger.
Any thoughts or ideas as to what I can check? Do triggers have certain permissions and if so, where can I make sure I have the permissions. I should have full access under my account as should the account that SQL Server Agent is logged in as.
Thanks for any help.
Pete
View 17 Replies
View Related
Jan 5, 2004
hi.
I must get i trigger the sql command, which execute trigger.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 21, 2014
Below is my requirement..
Create trigger on Table_XYZ ( After Insert,After Update)
select @var=Col_Last field is null from inserted
if @var is null
Execute sProc1
create proc sproc1
Business logic will create two csv files. Success and error files
success record will be deleted from Table_XYZ,
Error records updated with error_message.
Problem:- When i am updating Col_Last value to null or insert a record with NULL for Col_Last
Trigger is firing and executing SP.....But i was not able query the Table_XYZ and taking too much time...
sp_who2 shows blocked by...my SPID only
when i am executing SP alone ...every thing works fine....
when i am doing testing on trigger with Insert/Update... i am getting executinf query... no response...
If i comment below ones in Trigger...working fine...
--if @var is null
--Execute sProc1
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 7, 2004
Hi:
Currently I have two tables T1 and T2. A view V1 is defined over T1 with an INSTEAD OF UPDATE trigger and another view V2 is defined over V1 and T2 with another INSTEAD OF UPDATE trigger. Unfortunately, inside V2’s trigger following update statement is not working:
Update V1 set V1.name = i.name from inserted i
because SQL server complains:
View 'V1' has an INSTEAD OF UPDATE trigger and cannot be a target of an UPDATE FROM statement.
Is there any way to get around this problem? I.e., how can I make the INSTEAD OF UPDATE trigger in V2 to work if I can’t reference “inserted”?
Your help is appreciated,
Jeff
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 7, 2008
I have a database trigger that is set to call a CLR trigger/stored proc when a certain field in a table is updated. The issue is that if i execute the stored proc manually in enterprise studio, it works perfectly but the same call made through the trigger does not go through. A few more details -
I have CLR integration enabled on the sql server.
The dbo has UNSAFE ASSEMBLY rights
I have the both the assembly and the serialized dll imported in the database.
Here's the definition of the stored proc -
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[WriteXMLNotification]
@TaskID [nvarchar](20)
WITH EXECUTE AS CALLER
AS
EXTERNAL NAME [DataInterfaceWebServices].[TaskUpdateXMLWriter.WriteXMLNotification].[run]
and the trigger -
CREATE TRIGGER [dbo].[tr_Task_U]
ON [dbo].[_Task]
FOR UPDATE, INSERT AS
IF UPDATE (TaskType_Status) OR UPDATE (TaskType) OR UPDATE (TaskType_SubType1)
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
DECLARE @status AS INT
DECLARE @taskType AS INT
DECLARE @taskSubType AS INT
DECLARE @taskID as sysname
DECLARE @cmd as sysname
DECLARE @parentTask as sysname
DECLARE @NotificationXMLTaskID as sysname
SELECT @status = [TaskType_Status] FROM inserted
SELECT @taskType = [TaskType] FROM inserted
SELECT @taskSubType = [TaskType_SubType1] FROM inserted
SELECT @taskID = [TaskID] FROM inserted
SELECT @parentTask = [Parent_TaskID] FROM inserted
SELECT @NotificationXMLTaskID = [MCCTaskID] FROM _TaskNotificationXML WHERE [MCCTaskID] = @parentTask
IF (@status = 2602) AND (@taskType = 2282) AND (@taskSubType = 19500)
BEGIN
exec WriteXMLNotification @taskID;
END
ELSE IF (@taskType = 2285) AND (@parentTask IS NOT NULL) AND (@NotificationXMLTaskID IS NOT NULL)
BEGIN
exec WriteXMLNotification @parentTask;
END
END
I stepped into the trigger and it seems to execute the line " exec WriteXMLNotification @taskID;" but nothing happens, but if I run that same line manually, it works. Could it be that the impersonation by the EXECUTE AS clause is causing it to fail?
Please advise!
Thanks in Advance,
-Mihir Sonalkar.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 19, 2007
I am attempting to use views and Instead of triggers to insert, update and delete rows from THE table that is exposed through a view. In my application, the views provide a filtered set of rows from the base table that a user has permission to access. To improve performance, I submit a set (i.e. multiple rows) to be acted upon in a single SQL Statement. The insert and delete triggers work great. But, for some reason, the Instead of Update trigger on the view will not accept multiple rows. The Error I receive is:
Msg 414, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
UPDATE is not allowed because the statement updates view "FooView" which participates in a join and has an INSTEAD OF UPDATE trigger.
The only hint I can find about this behavior is from BOL for the Transact-SQL Update statement:
"A view with an INSTEAD OF UPDATE trigger cannot be a target of an UPDATE with a FROM clause."
Why is this not allowed?
If the trigger is on a table and the update statement is executed against the table it works. Why is the statement not allowed to execute against a view that has exactly the same construction as the table?
Any help or explanations for this behavior is appreciated.
I've included a code sample that will replicate the behavior and problem.
----------------------------------------------
Code Sample:
CREATE TABLE Foo (
ID INT PRIMARY KEY,
aName VARCHAR (10),
aValue FLOAT
)
GO
-- The view and its triggers
CREATE VIEW FooView AS
SELECT [ID]
,[aName]
,[aValue]
FROM Foo
GO
-- Instead of Triggers on the view
CREATE TRIGGER FooViewInsertInsteadOf
ON FooView
INSTEAD OF INSERT
AS
BEGIN
INSERT INTO Foo
SELECT Id, aName, aValue
FROM INSERTED
END
GO
CREATE TRIGGER FooViewInsteadOfUpdate
ON FooView
INSTEAD OF UPDATE
AS
BEGIN
UPDATE Foo
SET
Foo.aName = Inserted.aName,
Foo.aValue = Inserted.aValue
FROM Foo
JOIN INSERTED on INSERTED.ID = Foo.Id
END
GO
-- Test the Insert Trigger
INSERT INTO FooView
SELECT 2, 'First', 2.0
UNION ALL
SELECT 3, 'First', 3.0
UNION ALL
SELECT 4, 'First', 4.0
GO
SELECT * FROM FooView
GO
-- Update a single row in the view. This works with the Instead of Update Trigger.
UPDATE FooView
SET
FooView.aName = 'Third',
FooView.aValue = 3.3
WHERE FooView.ID = 3
GO
SELECT * FROM FooView
GO
===============================
-- T-SQL will not support the following statement when executed against a view with an instead of trigger.
-- If this statement is executed against a table with an instead of trigger it works as desired.
-- Why can't I execute this against the view?
UPDATE FooView
SET
FooView.aName = tmp.f1,
FooView.aValue = tmp.f2
FROM FooView
JOIN (
SELECT 2 as [id], 'Second' as [F1], 2.2 as [F2]
UNION ALL
SELECT 4, 'Fourth', 4.33
)
as tmp on FooView.ID = tmp.[id]
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 10, 2000
hi, I have a trigger on a table for insert, once there is new data into that table I want to run a nother store procedure by passing all input from inserted to the store procedure as input parameter. can I do that.
Thanks
Ali
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 3, 2006
What is the syntax for creating a update trigger and passing the values which were updated to a stored procedure on a linked server?? Specifically need syntax for updated value, as well as the syntax for executing the stored proc on the linked server.
Thank you
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 4, 2015
I have stored procedure on Server A which goes to ServerB to check and update table and then update on Server A as well.I have Trigger which suppose to execute stored procedure (as i mentioned above). But it failed with this error:--
Trigger code:--
CREATE TRIGGER [tr_DBA_create_database_notification] ON ALL SERVERÂ
AFTER CREATE_DATABASE
ASÂ
--execute dbadmin.dbo.usp_DBA_Refresh_DBAdmin_Tables
Error:--The operation could not be performed because OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI11" for linked server "xxx" was unable to begin a distributed transaction.Process ID 62 attempted to unlock a resource it does not own: DATABASE 21. Retry the transaction, because this error may be caused by a timing condition. If the problem persists, contact the database administrator.
Same stored procedure, if i execute manually or if i create sql job and execute this stored procedure, it works just fine..In trigger also, if i execute start job which has stored procedure, it works.My question is,why it failed when i execute stored procedure in TRIGGER.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 30, 2015
I am trying to create a logon trigger. As I am testing this, I discovered that each time I do a connection, I get 19 rows, inserted into my audit table. I ran profiler, and I see it is going through the logon trigger multiple times, for a single connection. So, what am I doing wrong? The code is fairly simplistic, and the profiler doesn't give a clue, as to what is going on. When I look at the output, I see the spid for the first couple of connections are different, then a spid, that is different from those 2 is in the next 17 rows. But, when I do an sp_who2, that spid does not exist.
This issue was noticed on a 2012 version, that I was first testing on, then had the same issue on a 2008 R2. I am currently testing on a 2014 version, that is doing the same thing. Is the logon trigger itself, firing, and causing this?
I also tried using the After Logon option, and got the same issue.
Here is the code:
CREATE TRIGGER LogonAuditTrigger
ON ALL SERVER WITH EXECUTE AS 'sa'
FOR LOGON
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @Body NVARCHAR(2000),
[code]....
View 0 Replies
View Related
Apr 3, 2006
Fellow database developers,I would like to draw on your experience with views. I have a databasethat includes many views. Sometimes, views contains other views, andthose views in turn may contain views. In fact, I have some views inmy database that are a product of nested views of up to 6 levels deep!The reason we did this was.1. Object-oriented in nature. Makes it easy to work with them.2. Changing an underlying view (adding new fields, removing etc),automatically the higher up views inherit this new information. Thismake maintenance very easy.3. These nested views are only ever used for the reporting side of ourapplication, not for the day-to-day database use by the application.We use Crystal Reports and Crystal is smart enough (can't believe Ijust said that about Crystal) to only pull back the fields that arebeing accessed by the report. In other words, Crystal will issue aSelect field1, field2, field3 from ReportingView Where .... eventhough "ReportingView" contains a long list of fields.Problems I can see.1. Parent views generally use "Select * From childview". This meansthat we have to execute a "sp_refreshview" command against all viewswhenever child views are altered.2. Parent views return a lot of information that isn't necessarilyused.3. Makes it harder to track down exactly where the information iscoming from. You have to drill right through to the child view to seethe raw table joins etc.Does anyone have any comments on this database design? I would love tohear your opinions and tales from the trenches.Best regards,Rod.
View 15 Replies
View Related
Jan 24, 2008
Hi,
I have a web application using Stored Procedure (SP). I see that there's a SP taking long time to execute. I try to capture it by Profiler Tool, and find out that with the same SP on the same db with the same parameter. The duration of executing by my web app is far bigger than the duration of executing on SQl server management studio - query window
Please see the image through this url http://kyxao.net/127/ExecutionProblem.png
Any ideas for this issue?
Thanks a lot
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 23, 2008
Hi,I have a web application using Stored Procedure (SP). I see that there's a SP taking long time to execute. I try to capture it by Profiler Tool, and find out that with the same SP on the same db with the same parameter. The duration of executing by my web app is far bigger than the duration of executing on SQl server management studio - query windowPlease see the image attached http://kyxao.net/127/ExecutionProblem.png Any ideas for this issue?Thanks a lot Jalijack
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 10, 2006
Hi all,I am facing an unusual issue here. I have a stored procedure, that return different set of result when I execute it from .NET component compare to when I execute it from SQL Management Studio. But as soon as I recompile the stored procedure, both will return the same results.This started to really annoying me, any thoughts or solution? Thanks very much guys
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 6, 2007
Which is more efficient? One large view that joins >=10 tables, or a few smaller views that join only the tables needed for individual pages?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 28, 2007
Hello.
Newbie here. I've only been using SQL for about a year now and have some minor questions about sql objects that reference other objects.
We have some views which reference other views in the joins. I will call one the primary view and the one being referenced in the joins as the secondary view.
Recently we made changes to the secondary view.
After which the primary views which referenced it would not work because of this change and had to be 'refreshed' by using drop/create scripts which essentially just dropped it and recreated the exact same view. I do not recall the exact error message that was returned other than it seemed to suggest that it could no longer see the secondary view since it had been changed. Nothing in the primary view was changed in any way, just the secondary.
Some here where I work have suggested off hand that this was a recompile of the primary view because the contents of the secondary changed.
My questions are:
1. Exactly why did this happen and is there a proper name for it when it does?
2. The same problem does not seem to occur when we have stored procedures referencing views in the joins which had just been changed. Why is that?
Thanks for any help on the matter. I greatly appreciate it.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 22, 2007
Hello,
to make a report easier I'm developing it using a view of joined views of joined views.
Is there any significant performance penalty as opposed to just having one big select?
Cheers.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 14, 2006
Hello There,I'm trying to create a view that has calculations dependent oncalculations, where the problem resides is that each time I make acalculation I must create an intermediate view so I can reference aprevious calculation.for example lets say I have my_table that has columns a & b. now I wanta view that has a & b, c = a + b, and d = c + 1.this is grossly simplified, the calculations I actually use are fairlycomplex and copying / pasting them is out of the question.so what I have is my_view_a which makes column c, and my my_view_finalwhich makes column d (however, in my real application I have 5 of theseviews, a/b/c/d/e/)is there anyway I can consolidate all these views into one? I wasthinking of using a stored procedure with temp tables or somethingalong those lines.I just which I can use the aliases that I create for c in d in onestep.any insight would be greatly appreciated.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 14, 2006
Hey,
I'm new to this whole SQL Server 2005 thing as well as database design and I've read up on various ways I can integrate business constraints into my database. I'm not sure which way applies to me, but I could use a helping hand in the right direction.
A quick explanation of the various tables I'm dealing with:
WBS - the Work Breakdown Structure, for example: A - Widget 1, AA - Widget 1 Subsystem 1, and etc.
Impacts - the Risk or Opportunity impacts for the weights of a part/assembly. (See Assemblies have Impacts below)
Allocations - the review of the product in question, say Widget 1, in terms of various weight totals, including all parts. Example - September allocation, Initial Demo allocation, etc. Mostly used for weight history and trending
Parts - There are hundreds of Parts which will eventually lead to thousands. Each part has a WBS element. [Seems redundant, but parts are managed in-house, and WBS elements are cross-company and issued by the Government]
Parts have Allocations - For weight history and trending (see Allocations). Example, Nut 17 can have a September 1st allocation, a September 5th allocation, etc.
Assemblies - Parts are assemblies by themselves and can belong to multiple assemblies. Now, there can be multiple parts on a product, say, an unmanned ground vehicle (UGV), and so those parts can belong to a higher "assembly" [For example, there can be 3 Nut 17's (lower assembly) on Widget 1 Subsystem 2 (higher assembly) and 4 more on Widget 1 Subsystem 5, etc.]. What I'm concerned about is ensuring that the weight roll-ups are accurate for all of the assemblies.
Assemblies have Impacts - There is a risk and opportunity impact setup modeled into this design to allow for a risk or opportunity to be marked on a per-assembly level. That's all this table represents.
A part is allocated a weight and then assigned to an assembly. The Assemblies table holds this hierarchical information - the lower assembly and the higher one, both of which are Parts entries in the [Parts have Allocations] table.
Therefore, to ensure proper weight roll ups in the [Parts have Allocations] table on a per part-basis, I would like to check for any inserts, updates, deletes on both the [Parts have Allocations] table as well as the [Assemblies] table and then re-calculate the weight roll up for every assembly. Now, I'm not sure if this is a huge performance hog, but I do need to keep all the information as up-to-date and as accurate as possible. As such, I'm not sure which method is even correct, although it seems an AFTER DML trigger is in order (from what I've gathered thus far). Keep in mind, this trigger needs to go through and check every WBS or Part and then go through and check all of it's associated assemblies and then ensure the weights are correct by re-summing the weights listed.
If you need the design or create script (table layout), please let me know.
Thanks.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Are there any limitations or gotchas to updating the same table whichfired a trigger from within the trigger?Some example code below. Hmmm.... This example seems to be workingfine so it must be something with my specific schema/code. We'reworking on running a SQL trace but if anybody has any input, fireaway.Thanks!create table x(Id int,Account varchar(25),Info int)GOinsert into x values ( 1, 'Smith', 15);insert into x values ( 2, 'SmithX', 25);/* Update trigger tu_x for table x */create trigger tu_xon xfor updateasbegindeclare @TriggerRowCount intset @TriggerRowCount = @@ROWCOUNTif ( @TriggerRowCount = 0 )returnif ( @TriggerRowCount > 1 )beginraiserror( 'tu_x: @@ROWCOUNT[%d] Trigger does not handle @@ROWCOUNT[color=blue]> 1 !', 17, 127, @TriggerRowCount) with seterror, nowait[/color]returnendupdate xsetAccount = left( i.Account, 24) + 'X',Info = i.Infofrom deleted, inserted iwhere x.Account = left( deleted.Account, 24) + 'X'endupdate x set Account = 'Blair', Info = 999 where Account = 'Smith'
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 5, 2006
This Audit Trigger is Generic (i.e. non-"Table Specific") attach it to any tabel and it should work. Be sure and create the 'Audit' table first though.
The following code write audit entries to a Table called
'Audit'
with columns
'ActionType' //varchar
'TableName' //varchar
'PK' //varchar
'FieldName' //varchar
'OldValue' //varchar
'NewValue' //varchar
'ChangeDateTime' //datetime
'ChangeBy' //varchar
using System;
using System.Data;
using System.Data.SqlClient;
using Microsoft.SqlServer.Server;
public partial class Triggers
{
//A Generic Trigger for Insert, Update and Delete Actions on any Table
[Microsoft.SqlServer.Server.SqlTrigger(Name = "AuditTrigger", Event = "FOR INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE")]
public static void AuditTrigger()
{
SqlTriggerContext tcontext = SqlContext.TriggerContext; //Trigger Context
string TName; //Where we store the Altered Table's Name
string User; //Where we will store the Database Username
DataRow iRow; //DataRow to hold the inserted values
DataRow dRow; //DataRow to how the deleted/overwritten values
DataRow aRow; //Audit DataRow to build our Audit entry with
string PKString; //Will temporarily store the Primary Key Column Names and Values here
using (SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection("context connection=true"))//Our Connection
{
conn.Open();//Open the Connection
//Build the AuditAdapter and Mathcing Table
SqlDataAdapter AuditAdapter = new SqlDataAdapter("SELECT * FROM Audit WHERE 1=0", conn);
DataTable AuditTable = new DataTable();
AuditAdapter.FillSchema(AuditTable, SchemaType.Source);
SqlCommandBuilder AuditCommandBuilder = new SqlCommandBuilder(AuditAdapter);//Populates the Insert command for us
//Get the inserted values
SqlDataAdapter Loader = new SqlDataAdapter("SELECT * from INSERTED", conn);
DataTable inserted = new DataTable();
Loader.Fill(inserted);
//Get the deleted and/or overwritten values
Loader.SelectCommand.CommandText = "SELECT * from DELETED";
DataTable deleted = new DataTable();
Loader.Fill(deleted);
//Retrieve the Name of the Table that currently has a lock from the executing command(i.e. the one that caused this trigger to fire)
SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand("SELECT object_name(resource_associated_entity_id) FROM
ys.dm_tran_locks WHERE request_session_id = @@spid and resource_type = 'OBJECT'", conn);
TName = cmd.ExecuteScalar().ToString();
//Retrieve the UserName of the current Database User
SqlCommand curUserCommand = new SqlCommand("SELECT system_user", conn);
User = curUserCommand.ExecuteScalar().ToString();
//Adapted the following command from a T-SQL audit trigger by Nigel Rivett
//http://www.nigelrivett.net/AuditTrailTrigger.html
SqlDataAdapter PKTableAdapter = new SqlDataAdapter(@"SELECT c.COLUMN_NAME
from INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLE_CONSTRAINTS pk ,
INFORMATION_SCHEMA.KEY_COLUMN_USAGE c
where pk.TABLE_NAME = '" + TName + @"'
and CONSTRAINT_TYPE = 'PRIMARY KEY'
and c.TABLE_NAME = pk.TABLE_NAME
and c.CONSTRAINT_NAME = pk.CONSTRAINT_NAME", conn);
DataTable PKTable = new DataTable();
PKTableAdapter.Fill(PKTable);
switch (tcontext.TriggerAction)//Switch on the Action occuring on the Table
{
case TriggerAction.Update:
iRow = inserted.Rows[0];//Get the inserted values in row form
dRow = deleted.Rows[0];//Get the overwritten values in row form
PKString = PKStringBuilder(PKTable, iRow);//the the Primary Keys and There values as a string
foreach (DataColumn column in inserted.Columns)//Walk through all possible Table Columns
{
if (!iRow[column.Ordinal].Equals(dRow[column.Ordinal]))//If value changed
{
//Build an Audit Entry
aRow = AuditTable.NewRow();
aRow["ActionType"] = "U";//U for Update
aRow["TableName"] = TName;
aRow["PK"] = PKString;
aRow["FieldName"] = column.ColumnName;
aRow["OldValue"] = dRow[column.Ordinal].ToString();
aRow["NewValue"] = iRow[column.Ordinal].ToString();
aRow["ChangeDateTime"] = DateTime.Now.ToString();
aRow["ChangedBy"] = User;
AuditTable.Rows.InsertAt(aRow, 0);//Insert the entry
}
}
break;
case TriggerAction.Insert:
iRow = inserted.Rows[0];
PKString = PKStringBuilder(PKTable, iRow);
foreach (DataColumn column in inserted.Columns)
{
//Build an Audit Entry
aRow = AuditTable.NewRow();
aRow["ActionType"] = "I";//I for Insert
aRow["TableName"] = TName;
aRow["PK"] = PKString;
aRow["FieldName"] = column.ColumnName;
aRow["OldValue"] = null;
aRow["NewValue"] = iRow[column.Ordinal].ToString();
aRow["ChangeDateTime"] = DateTime.Now.ToString();
aRow["ChangedBy"] = User;
AuditTable.Rows.InsertAt(aRow, 0);//Insert the Entry
}
break;
case TriggerAction.Delete:
dRow = deleted.Rows[0];
PKString = PKStringBuilder(PKTable, dRow);
foreach (DataColumn column in inserted.Columns)
{
//Build and Audit Entry
aRow = AuditTable.NewRow();
aRow["ActionType"] = "D";//D for Delete
aRow["TableName"] = TName;
aRow["PK"] = PKString;
aRow["FieldName"] = column.ColumnName;
aRow["OldValue"] = dRow[column.Ordinal].ToString();
aRow["NewValue"] = null;
aRow["ChangeDateTime"] = DateTime.Now.ToString();
aRow["ChangedBy"] = User;
AuditTable.Rows.InsertAt(aRow, 0);//Insert the Entry
}
break;
default:
//Do Nothing
break;
}
AuditAdapter.Update(AuditTable);//Write all Audit Entries back to AuditTable
conn.Close(); //Close the Connection
}
}
//Helper function that takes a Table of the Primary Key Column Names and the modified rows Values
//and builds a string of the form "<PKColumn1Name=Value1>,PKColumn2Name=Value2>,......"
public static string PKStringBuilder(DataTable primaryKeysTable, DataRow valuesDataRow)
{
string temp = String.Empty;
foreach (DataRow kColumn in primaryKeysTable.Rows)//for all Primary Keys of the Table that is being changed
{
temp = String.Concat(temp, String.Concat("<", kColumn[0].ToString(), "=", valuesDataRow[kColumn[0].ToString)].ToString(), ">,"));
}
return temp;
}
}
The trick was getting the Table Name and the Primary Key Columns.
I hope this code is found useful.
Comments and Suggestion will be much appreciated.
View 16 Replies
View Related
Oct 30, 2007
Table 1
First_Name
Middle_Name
Surname
John
Ian
Lennon
Mike
Buffalo
Tyson
Tom
Finney
Jones
Table 2
ID
F
M
S
DOB
1
Athony
Harold
Wilson
24/4/67
2
Margaret
Betty
Thathcer
1/1/1808
3
John
Ian
Lennon
2/2/1979
4
Mike
Buffalo
Tyson
3/4/04
5
Tom
Finney
Jones
1/1/2000
I want to be able to create a trigger that updates table 2 when a row is inserted into table 1. However I€™m not sure how to increment the ID in table 2 or to update only the row that has been inserted.
View 17 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2008
A
ID
Name
1
Joe
2
Fred
3
Ian
4
Bill
B
ID
1
4
I want to be able to create a trigger so that when a row is inserted into table A by a specific user then the ID will appear in table B. Is it possible to find out the login id of the user inserting a row?
I believe the trigger should look something like this:
create trigger test_trigger
on a
for insert
as
insert into b(ID)
select i.id
from inserted i
where
--specific USER
View 9 Replies
View Related
Mar 18, 2008
how to create new CLR trigger from existing T-Sql Trigger Thanks in advance
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
When a row gets modified and it invokes a trigger, we would like to beable to update the row that was modified inside the trigger. This is(basically) how we are doing it now:CREATE TRIGGER trTBL ON TBLFOR UPDATE, INSERT, DELETEasupdate TBLset fld = 'value'from inserted, TBLwhere inserted.id= TBL.id....This work fine but it seems like it could be optimized. Clearly we arehaving to scan the entire table again to update the row. But shouldn'tthe trigger already know which row invoked it. Do we have to scan thetable again for this row or is their some syntax that allows us toupdate the row that invoked the trigger. If not, why. It seems likethis would be a fairly common task. Thanks.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Salve, non riesco a disabilitare un trigger su sqlserver nè da queryanalyzer, nè da enterprise manager.In pratica tal cosa riuscivo a farla in Oracle con TOAD, mentre qui nonriesco.Mi interessa disattivarlo senza cancellarlo per poi riattivarlo al bisognosenza rilanciare lo script di creazione.Grazie a tuttiHi I need to disable a DB trigger and I'm not able to do this neither withquery analyzer, neither with enterprise manager.I remeber this job was quite simple using TOAd in Oracle.I'm interested in making it disabled not delete it, without run creationscript.Thanks a lot to everybody.
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 30, 2008
Hi,
I am not sure if this is the right forum to post this question.
I run an update statement like "Update mytable set status='S' " on the SQL 2005 management Studio.
When I run "select * from mytable" for a few seconds all status = "S". After a few seconds all status turn to "H".
This is a behaviour when you have an update trigger for the table. But I don't see any triggers under this table.
What else would cause the database automatically change my update?
Could there be any other place I should look for an update trigger on this table?
Thanks,
View 3 Replies
View Related
