Explicitly Lock A Table?

Apr 23, 2007

I have multiple applications which can potentially update the same trigger simultaneously. Each application:

(1) Reads the contents of the current trigger
(2) Creates a new trigger based on the current contents
(3) Drops the trigger
(4) Creates the new trigger

I need to insure that once one application begins step (1), then no other application can start step (1) until step (4) has completed.

Any ideas on how this can be done? Some databases have a concept of locking tables explicitly, so for them, I can do:

(0) lock table foo;
(1) - (4)
(5) unlock table foo;

Is there such a concept in mysql or is there another way of accomplishing this?

Thanks,
Eric

View 6 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

How To Lock A Table So Others Cannot Lock It

May 23, 2001

Hi,

I want to lock a table so others cannot lock it but able to read it inside transactions.

The coding I need is something like this: set implicit_transactions on begin transaction select * from table1 with (tablock, holdlock) update table2 set field1 = 'test' commit transaction commit transaction

I have tried the coding above, it won't prevent others from locking table1.

So, I changed the tablock to tablockx to prevent others from locking table1. But this will also prevent others from reading table1. So, how can I lock table1 so others cannot lock it but still able to read it?

Thank you for any help

View 1 Replies View Related

Close Connections Explicitly

Jan 14, 2008

Hi everybody,How is it possible to close any open connections from the connection pool explicitly like on the log off page? So when the users log off from the application I want to close all connections that were opened during the use of application.asp.net forums is the best....thanks,Murthy here 

View 4 Replies View Related

Putting Dbo Explicitly In Select Staetement

Nov 1, 2006

I have witten a lot of stored procedures in my project where I did not put dbo before the user tables.My colleague told me that I have to put dbo for all statements other there could be a problem.

Any thought?,

Please assist.

View 6 Replies View Related

Explicitly Replicating One Record Out Of Scheduled Replication.

Nov 26, 2007

Hi,

I’m having a situation where I have configured replication between remote sites and my head office, after every 24 hours. It is working perfectly. Now I want to modify it as per new business requirement. For this I need to know the answers to following questions. Any help will be appreciated.

Consider sample database with a master and child tables.

1) It is possible to replicate master table immediately and child table every 24 hour?

2) is there any possibility that we can explicitly replicate a single child record when required? For example, people can see master record without the need to see child table records, but if some one want to see some specific record from child table, can it be done?


Regards,

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: Can Default To 0 When Pass NULL Explicitly

Sep 23, 2014

I have a Nullable columns. I want the value to be zero if NULL is passed.

1) having a view for every such table,
2) using ISNULL for needed columns in that view
3) using those view for inserts instead of using tables directly.

This way i can reduce the number of places to use ISNULL in all my SPs.I dont want to make it to NOT NULL, as my application impact will be high. And Default constraint does not work here.

View 9 Replies View Related

Error: A Deadlock Was Detected While Trying To Lock Variable X For Read Access. A Lock Could Not Be Acquired After 16 Attempts

Feb 2, 2007

I simply made my script task (or any other task) fail

In my package error handler i have a Exec SQL task - for Stored Proc

SP statement is set in following expression (works fine in design time):

"EXEC [dbo].[us_sp_Insert_STG_FEED_EVENT_LOG] @FEED_ID= " + (DT_WSTR,10) @[User::FEED_ID] + ", @FEED_EVENT_LOG_TYPE_ID = 3, @STARTED_ON = '"+(DT_WSTR,30)@[System::StartTime] +"', @ENDED_ON = NULL, @message = 'Package failed. ErrorCode: "+(DT_WSTR,10)@[System::ErrorCode]+" ErrorMsg: "+@[System::ErrorDescription]+"', @FILES_PROCESSED = '" + @[User::t_ProcessedFiles] + "', @PKG_EXECUTION_ID = '" + @[System::ExecutionInstanceGUID] + "'"

From progress:

Error: The Script returned a failure result.
Task SCR REIL Data failed

OnError - Task SQL Insert Error Msg
Error: A deadlock was detected while trying to lock variable "System::ErrorCode, System::ErrorDescription, System::ExecutionInstanceGUID, System::StartTime, User::FEED_ID, User::t_ProcessedFiles" for read access. A lock could not be acquired after 16 attempts and timed out.
Error: The expression ""EXEC [dbo].[us_sp_Insert_STG_FEED_EVENT_LOG] @FEED_ID= " + (DT_WSTR,10) @[User::FEED_ID] + ", @FEED_EVENT_LOG_TYPE_ID = 3, @STARTED_ON = '"+(DT_WSTR,30)@[System::StartTime] +"', @ENDED_ON = NULL, @message = 'Package failed. ErrorCode: "+(DT_WSTR,10)@[System::ErrorCode]+" ErrorMsg: "+@[System::ErrorDescription]+"', @FILES_PROCESSED = '" + @[User::t_ProcessedFiles] + "', @PKG_EXECUTION_ID = '" + @[System::ExecutionInstanceGUID] + "'"" on property "SqlStatementSource" cannot be evaluated. Modify the expression to be valid.

Warning: The Execution method succeeded, but the number of errors raised (4) reached the maximum allowed (1); resulting in failure. This occurs when the number of errors reaches the number specified in MaximumErrorCount. Change the MaximumErrorCount or fix the errors.

And how did I get 4 errors? - I only set my script task result to failure

View 11 Replies View Related

Updating Database Record Explicitly On Power Turn Off

Dec 18, 2007

HI all,
I have a windows application which runs a process,

I am updating database column "Status" with Processing when the application is running, and on completion I update it with Staus="Completed" or in case I close the application
I update db with Status="Interupted" .

I have problem that in case while proces is running, power supply or system turns off, the db Status="Processing", but in actual it is interupted.
How will i update?

Please help.

View 1 Replies View Related

How To Explicitly Allocate An Sql Server Connection From The Connections Pool

Feb 21, 2008

Hello.

I have a db dal containing the following code:


SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand();

cmd.Connection = dbc;

cmd.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure;

cmd.CommandText = "SOME STORED PROCEDURE";
.
.
.
declare some SqlParameters
.
.
.



dbc.Open();

cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();

dbc.Close();

This code, when concurrently running via several threads, yields the following exception:
"The connection was not closed. The connection's current state is open."


My questions are:
1. Why don't .Net allocate another connection from the pool (I try to only concurrently run 2 threads while there are 25 connections in the connection pool) ?
2. How can one explicitly allocate a connection?
3. How do you suggest to solve this problem without a mutex/monitor etc' on the 3 bold lines above and without BeginExequteNonQuery()?







Thank you !






View 2 Replies View Related

Lock SQL Table Using Asp.net

Jul 23, 2004

Hi,all:
This problem almost drives me crazy, hope I can get some hints from you guyz!!!
Ok, here is the situation:
I wanna only one users 2 modify the data(update) from my page each time, and if at the same time, there are some other users connecting my database through .aspx page, they can only browse the data until the first users finish updating.
It seems I need to implement locking the database, but I am not sure how I am gonna do that using asp.net!!!
Thanx in advance!

View 5 Replies View Related

How To Lock A Table Or Row In Sql?

Nov 1, 2005

hi, i have an application that updates some records in sql tables, and i want to do a  web application that updates records in the some database-table(sql) so, my question is how can i lock the row or table  so i dont have concurrency problems.tnx in advance.

View 2 Replies View Related

Table Lock...

Nov 5, 2007

Hello Friends,
I am having a VB application running for the SQL SERVER DB. The VB application is installed on the multiple of PCs in the network. Now when I am trying to fetch the same from all the different PCs simultaneously, its amazingly fast. But the issue comes when I am trying to update the same table (but different rows) from the different PCs simultaneously. The time taken is directly proportaional to the number of users. I am not getting what could be the problem? Can any one suggest me the approch? Is it some related to table / row / page locking? As all the connections are trying to update on the same table. I checked the isolation level. Its default, "READ COMMITTED". Kindly suggest...




Thanks in advance........
Rahul Jha

View 14 Replies View Related

Table Lock

Jun 5, 2008

Hi Gurus,

How can we know that particular table is locked.



Thanks,
ServerTeam

View 1 Replies View Related

How To Lock A Table

Mar 21, 2006

Hai to all,

I want to lock a patricular table during my transaction is this possible, for Example

Create sp() as
BEGIN
Lock Table
Do Some work
Relaese the Lock
END

like this.

View 3 Replies View Related

Table Lock

Feb 10, 2008

Is there any way to lock tables in SQL Server?

View 2 Replies View Related

Table Lock

Jul 23, 2005

Hi,If I run an insert statement from the query analyzer and then try toopen the table from enterprise manager then it takes long time to openthe table. But this problem dissapears when i put the statement insideBegin/End Transaction statement.Any idea why this is happening?Thank in advance.Taw.

View 1 Replies View Related

Table Lock

Jul 23, 2005

Which lock type or isolation level should I use to be sure that no onewill read or write or do anything with the table I'm using?Code block should look something like this:lock tableread value from tablechange value to new_valueupdate table set value = new_valuerelease lockWhile I'm changing the value absolutly no one should be able to readfrom the table.

View 7 Replies View Related

Table Lock

Nov 21, 2007

How do I do a simple table lock?

Thanks,

MeTitus

View 4 Replies View Related

Table Lock

May 6, 2008

Hi Friends

In my server i am getting this error how can i slove this error
could u people any body please help me

error:
Table Lock Wait Time Per Second is 867.3330
milliseconds per second, which exceeds threshold of 10
milliseconds per second."



Thanks
subu

View 1 Replies View Related

Table Lock-urgent

Oct 3, 2000

Hi,

How can I see which table is locked up by some particular process?
I know that I can view paricular spid from 'current activity'. But is there any way I can see which table is the center of problem?
I really appreciate your help..

View 1 Replies View Related

How To Lock The Row Or Table When Update?

Nov 4, 2004

Hi,
I am working on a project which need to produce a sequential certificate number, Everytime I need a new certificate number, I need to find out what is the max number in the database and then the new certificate number just max+1.
But how can I block another
transaction to check what is max certi. number while this transaction is in the middle of writing the new certificate number(max+1) into database . Does ADLockOptimistic work in this case? Here is the code:
My database sql 2000.

cmdTemp.CommandText="Select max(certificateNumber) from product_table where certificateNumber<> 8888888"
set cert_info=Server.CreateObject("ADODB.RecordSet")
cert_info.Open cmdTemp, , AdOpenKeySet, adLockOptimistic
If Not cert_info.EOF then

certnumber=cert_info(0)+1

End if
cert_info.close
set cert_info=nothing

View 10 Replies View Related

To Give A Table Lock

Oct 14, 2005

How can i give a table wise exclusive lock in MSSQL Server ?

I got the description but, How can I apply this ?
The sql :
LOCK TABLE <tablename> IN EXCLUSIVE MODE
is not working.

Is there any query/method to do this ?
Please help ...

thanks


About Exclusive locks
--------------------
Exclusive (X) locks are used for data modification operations, such as UPDATE, INSERT, or DELETE.

Other transactions cannot read or modify data locked with an Exclusive (X) lock. If a Shared (S) exists, other transactions cannot acquire an Exclusive (X) lock.
--------------------

View 2 Replies View Related

Keeping A Lock On Table Or Row

Feb 5, 2004

I need to update a row but keep a lock on the table (so no one else can update it) while I do run some more code. In Oracle, it always locks whatever you update until you hit commit, but sql server works opposite. How do I tell it not to commit a statement, or how would I explicitly get a lock and then release it later?

View 4 Replies View Related

Help: Table Lock Confirmation

Mar 12, 2004

I need confirmation from you SQL Server experts out there. Please let me know if the following works. Thanks!

This stored procedure gets a value and increments by 1, but while it does this, I want to lock the table so no other processes can read the same value between the UPDATE and SELECT (of course, this may only happen in a fraction of a second, but I anticipate that we will have thousands of concurrent users). I need to manually increment this column because an identity column is not appropriate in this case.

BEGIN TRANSACTION

UPDATE forum WITH (TABLOCKX)
SET forum_last_used_msg_id = forum_last_used_msg_id + 1
WHERE forum_id = @forum_id

SELECT @new_id = forum_last_used_msg_id
FROM forum
WHERE forum_id = @forum_id

COMMIT TRANSACTION

View 10 Replies View Related

How To Remove Lock Associated With Table

Aug 7, 2013

I have a query like this

SELECT TOP 1 * FROM ITAM_RAMS_STAGING

not getting value...seems like lock associated with that table

how to remove the lock if exists

View 2 Replies View Related

Table Lock - Issue

Jul 27, 2007

Folks,

I have an update statement and it looks like it is holding exclusive lock on the table and does not release it until it completes. a PAGLOCK hint has been specified on the update statement and i think it is being ignored. It is a transaction database.so, other queries accessing that table has to wait for it to complete and thus causing timeouts.The Update statement is also causing high IO and CPU utilization. How do I

1) reduce the granularity level to prevent the locking
2)any ideas on optimizing the query?

Here is the query:

UPDATE Customers
SET IndexStart = TMP.IndexStart,
IndexPosition = TMP.IndexStart,
IndexStop = TMP.IndexStop,
IndexLevel = TMP.IndexLevel
FROM Customers AS C WITH (PAGLOCK)
INNER JOIN #tmp_IndexBCs AS TMP WITH (TABLOCKX) ON C.ID= TMP.ID

Thx
Sri

View 7 Replies View Related

Table Lock Issue?

Oct 6, 2007

Hi All

We are facing atable lock issue , while running a SSIS package
We have two flows . one for insert and other for update into the same target table.
The update is done using a procedure.

We have disabled the lock table option in the target( in the insert flow)
The first set of records which come for updates flow fine.
But when the records start coming into the insert flow, the data flow stops.

Is this a table lock issue?
How do i set the commit interval at the update flow?
can someone lpease help me out of this situation

Thanka and Regards
Preethe

View 1 Replies View Related

How Do You Lock An Entire Table?

Jul 23, 2005

Hi,I need to lock a table so that Inserts are prevented as well as deleted andupdates. At present I'm thinking this might do it:SELECT * FROM myTable WITH(UPLOCK)but then again I'm not sure whether this will cover the insert case.Thanks,Robin

View 5 Replies View Related

Lock Table Problem

Dec 6, 2005

HiI want to lock a table using JDBC as I want to perform some query's (readand write) in exclusive mode. Different threads will be executing the samecode simultaneously. I am using the following statementsStatement stmt = connection.createStatement();stmt.executeUpdate("lock table STATUS_TBL in EXCLUSIVE mode");but am getting the following error[Microsoft][SQLServer 2000 Driver for JDBC][SQLServer]Line 1: Incorrectsyntax near 'STATUS_TBL'.can somebody tell the correct syntax for the lock table statement.Thanks

View 1 Replies View Related

Alter Table Lock?

Sep 11, 2007

Hi!
I use proc handling special business logic (I also use constraints, indexes for that ;-)
Now I have a situation where I should check multiple rows with an proc.
Preventing multi-user issues I want to lock the table (yes, yes potential performance issue, but in this case there are few simultaneous jobs) - in Oracle I could lock the table, but what to do in SQL Server?

Maybe you have an better alternative, then let me hear ;-)

Or should I use "begin transaction"...

Thanks for help

View 1 Replies View Related

Lock 'Childreen' Table

Oct 26, 2006

Hi!

I'm new in SQL and I´ve been the problem bellow:

I lock a record in one foreign table and automaticaly SQL lock the record that matches on primary table.

But this occours just in some primaries tables and not in all. I need that just the table that are of SELECT are lock. How can I do this?

Example:

** At open of the invoice:

SET ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED

BEGIN TRANSACTION

SELECT * FROM INVOICE WITH (ROWLOCK UPLOCK) WHERE ( ID = 15 )

******* at the end of invoice:

INSERT INTO INVOICE ........

COMMIT TRANSACTION

END



******* The relationship are:

INVOICE <>> ITENS_INVOICE

ITENS_INVOICE <>> PRODUCTS

CUSTOMER <>> INVOICE

VENDORS <>> INVOICE

Just the INVOICE and PRODUCTS record´s involved in Transaction are lock. ( The CUSTOMER and VENDORS are not locked for example )

But I need that just INVOICE record be locked.

Thank´s for all and sorry my English.



Igor Sane

São Paulo - Brazil

View 6 Replies View Related

Row Lock Versus Page Lock In SQL 2000.

Apr 7, 2004

Hi
We are facing an acute situation in our web-application. Technology is ASP.NEt/VB.NET, SQL Server 2000.

Consider a scenario in which User 1 is clicking on a button which calls a SQL stored procedure. This procedure selects Group A of records of Database Page1.

At the same time if User 2 also clicks the same button which calls same SQL stored procedure. This procedure selects Group B of records of Database Page1.

So, its the same Page1 but different sets of records. At this moment, both the calls have shared locked on the Page1 inside the procedure.

Now, in call 1, inside the procedure after selecting Group A of records, the next statement is and update to those records. As soon as update statement executes, SQL Server throws a deadlock exception as follows :

Transaction (Process ID 78) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction

We are able to understand why its happening. Its because, Group A and Group B of records are on the same Page1. But both the users have shared lock on the Page1. So, no one gets the exclusive lock in records for update, even though, the records are different.

How can I resolve this issue? How can I get lock on wanted rows instead of entire page?

Please advice. Thanks a bunch.

Pankaj

View 1 Replies View Related

Exclusive Insert Lock On A Table

Sep 10, 2007

Hello All!
I want to perform 4 or 5 statements as a transaction but I need to make sure that during this complete transaction no one else inserts or deletes records from a table named SomeTable.
So how can I lock MyTable at the beggining of the transaction so that during my transaction no one else can insert or delete anything in table SomeTable?
Thanks!
David
 

View 9 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved