I have currently one SQL FT catalog which indices couple of tables in on our server on nightly basis. It does a 'full' indexing of data as originally designed. Now the time it is taking to index all the data is unacceptable to user. I am working on it to make it index 'incrementally'.
But, for a short-term approach I want to find out, can we FT index a 'table A' in two catalogs on same SQL Server?
Hi all,
I have a column which i want to put inside ascending indices, that is, empty column which i want to enter
1,2,3,4.....[tble no. of rows]
so this table:
col1 | col2 | col3
-------------------
| a | b
| c | d
| e | f
becomes:
col1 | col2 | col3
-------------------
1 | a | b
2 | c | d
3 | e | f
thnks,
Ahron
I've created a new table and added data to it. Now I want to index a given column. Will simply creating and saving the index index the column or do I need to do something else to create the actual index?
Barkingdog
Hi
I want to know is a flat file faster than a RDBMS for indexing for example a search engine indexing would a flat file be better in terms of performance, scalability etc than a RDBMS?
OK, I imported 680 million records into an unindexed table. That went well.
Then, I went into Enterprise Manager and added a two column non-unique clustered index to that table to speed access.
It's been running for ~36 hours and I have no idea when it will complete. I have deadlines that I'm going to miss and am very nervous; what can I do?
SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition (8.00.818 - sp3 + hotfixes)
Dual 3Ghz Xeon (two physical CPUs each have HyperThreading enabled)
Windows 2000 SP4
4GB RAM (although I just noticed the 3GB OS switch wasn't on)
SCSI boot drive
tempdb, data, and transaction log are on a FibreChannel RAID SAN
Help! Thanks in advance!
In the following example, I have a "Person" table, and a many-to-many "Relationship" table which stores the r/ship between any two people:
[Person] [Relshp]
---------------- ---------------------
| PersonId PK|<-.-. | RelshpId PK |
| PersonName | '-| PersonId |
---------------- '--| RelatedToPersonId |
| RelationshipType |
---------------------
There are 2 FK constraints, linking
1. [Relshp].[PersonId] to primary key [Person].[PersonId], and
2. [Relshp].[RelatedToPersonId] to primary key [Person].[PersonId].
What kind of index structure would best support those FK constraints?
Would it be:
a) One combined index:
CREATE INDEX IX_Relshp ON Relshp (PersonId, RelatedToPersonId)
or
b) Two indexes:
CREATE INDEX IX_RelshpP ON Relshp (PersonId)
CREATE INDEX IX_RelshpR ON Relshp (RelatedToPersonId)
or
c) Two "mirrored" combined indexes:
CREATE INDEX IX_RelshpP ON Relshp (PersonId, RelatedToPersonId)
CREATE INDEX IX_RelshpR ON Relshp (RelatedToPersonId, PersonId)
I am using sql server express edition and when i try to apply full text indexing on the table - the setting is set to "NO" and i am unable to set it to Yes
please advise - thanks Jeff
i have a directory database with approx. 80 million records. i am feeding the database with bulk_insert. Indexing one of the fields took about 8 hrs. After indexing when i run queries with the indexed field the response time is under 1 sec. However if i run select queries with like on non-indexed fields it takes more than 2 mins. So i decided to index 4 other fields in the database and it looks like the indexing process is going to run for 2 days.
i am a novice in SQL database design and i am not sure if this is the best way to index the table. i am just using create index. Any suggestions / advice welcome.
I am using a multi-statement table-valued function to assemble data from several tables and views for a report. To do this, I INSERT data into the first few columns and then use UPDATEs to put data additional data into each row. Each UPDATE uses a WHERE criteria that identifies a unique row, based on the value of the first few columns.
The problem I'm having is that the UPDATEs are taking forever to execute. I believe the reason is that the temporary table that's created for the function is not indexed, so each row update requires a complete search of several columns.
In other situations I've been able to define one column as a primary key for the temporary table, but in this situation the primary key would have to consist of four columns, which doesn't seem to be allowed in the table definition for the function.
Is there any way to create indexes for the temporary tables that are created for multistatement table-valued functions? I think that would improve the UPDATE performance dramatically.
Thanks,
Lee Silverman
JackRabbit Sports
Hi,
I am using SQL SERVER 2005 Express. I am trying to set up Enable a Table for Full-Text Indexing. I am following these instructions:
How to: Enable a Table for Full-Text Indexing (SQL Server Management Studio)
Hi experts,
Im very very new to sql server world..wanted to know what kind of indexes to be created on the below mentioned table columns for making this view run fastly.As of now there are no indexes created on these view definition columns
CREATE View hrinu.Parity as
select
T1.Matcle as CorpID,
T2.Nmpres as Name,
T4.DATDEB as LeaveFrom,
T4.TEMDEB as PM,
T4.DATFIN as LeaveTo,
T4.TEMFIN as AM,
T10.LIBLON as LeaveType,
T8.LIBLON as Location,
T12.LIBLON as ParentOrg
from HRINU.zy00 T1,
HRINU.zy3y T2,
HRINU.zy39 T3,
HRINU.zyag T4,
HRINU.zy38 T5,
HRINU.zy1s T6,
HRINU.zd00 T7,
HRINU.zd01 T8,
HRINU.zd00 T9,
HRINU.zd01 T10,
HRINU.zd00 T11,
HRINU.zd01 T12
where T4.Nudoss = T3.nudoss
and T4.Nudoss = T1.Nudoss
and T1.Nudoss = T2.nudoss
and T3.nudoss = T5.nudoss
and T6.nudoss = T1.nudoss
AND T7.NUDOSS = T8.NUDOSS
AND T9.NUDOSS = T10.NUDOSS
AND T11.NUDOSS = T12.NUDOSS
AND T3.IDWKLO = T7.CDCODE
AND T4.MOTIFA = T9.CDCODE
AND T5.IDESTA = T11.CDCODE
and T6.stempl = 'A'
and t7.cdstco = 'z04'
AND T8.CDLANG = 'U'
and t9.cdstco = 'DSJ'
AND T10.CDLANG= 'U'
and t11.cdstco= 'DRE'
AND T12.CDLANG= 'U'
and T4.DATDEB <= T3.DTEN00 and T4.DATFIN >= T3.DTEF00
and T3.DTEN00 <= T5.DTEN00 and T3.DTEN00 >= T5.DTEF00
and T6.dtef1s <= getdate() and T6.datxxx > getdate()
Also Please suggest me some links where i can get info about the indexes that has to be created on these types of queries where joins are involved on these many tables.
Also throw some light on how to analyse the execution plan for further enhancements.
Thanks in advance
Regrds
Arvind L
Hi,
The other day we tried online re-indexing feature of SQL 2005 and it€™s performing faster than offline re-indexing. Could you please validate if it€™s supposed to do be this way? I always thought offline should be faster than online.
Thanks,
Ritesh
Hi,I am using data from multiple databases and/or queries. It would greatlysimplify and speed things up if I could use CONTAINS in processing theresults. However, "CONTAINS" requires the data to be indexed. Due to theamount of processing, I think it would be faster even if I had to re-indexevery time.For example, I would like to do something like this (simplified toillustrate the desired functionality... This should show all of the wordsfrom one table that are not contained in their current or inflectional formswithin another table):SELECT W1.ContentFROM(SELECT Word AS ContentFROM MyTable) W1LEFT OUTER JOIN(SELECT Phrase AS ContentFROM MyOtherTable) W2ON W2.Content CONTAINS(INFLECTIONAL, W1.Content)WHERE W2.Content IS NULLCan the results of a procedure be indexed? If not, can I drop the resultsinto a new table and trigger an automatic index of it, pausing the procedureuntil the indexing is done?Or, it there another way?Thanks!
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have an SP which concatenates 2 columns in a where clause - ie WHERE [Column1] + [Column2] = @var. Â This, as far as I'm aware, is not going to access any seek on an index on a table.
My task is to create an index on this table and get the SP to access said index.
Aside from combining the two columns into one column on the table, how I can get an SP to access the newly created index when queried by the SP?
One thought of mine is to firstly index Column1 and allow the SP to access this index by inserting the rows into a temp table. Â Then a search on the temp table to retrieve the records on a search on Column2.
I'm working on re-indexing a table using some commands from ALTER INDEX REBUILD from Microsoft. The indexes will be tested for threshold fragmentation. my plan is once the reindex is executed, a transaction backup will occur while controlling the size of the log file. Â The query impose time limitations or stop reindexing after the specified amount of time has elapsed.
my question,
1. How can I integrate a query which checks if transaction log is getting full and which runs a Tlog backup if over 70%
2. How do I impose time limitation?
As backups are done on SQL, it keeps all the catalogs. Over time, there are too many. Which system table(s) contains those backup catalog entries and should
I clean up some of those entries to keep the size in check or there is a max
limit and being taken care by itself.
Appeciate your help !
Jim
Hi all,
I am a graduate assistant in Central Michigan University. Currently, My work is to create a table or a catalog that explains all the details of a table and the fields with in the table. We are the looking for details like, stored procedures or Views or other tables or Reports that are using the particular field or table. How can i capture those details and make it as an automated process, which updates when ever there is an add on in use or something else.
Please help me with this as soon as possible.
Thanks,
Swaroop Govula
How to allow updates system catalogs in SQL Server 2005 ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi All,
looking for some views about where to place these catalogs. The manual says they work more effiecntly on a different drive to the database, which is understandable.
I'm in the processes of designing a new database application which is to be avaiable via the internet, and extranet app. But as I'm planning to host the app and the main database on a shared server but to have the catalogs on another server held in house. The app will have search facilities as its main use. They will obviously be some performace issues, but is this a good idea?
Thanks for any comments..
Regards
Davej
Replication: Is it possible to replicate Full-text catalogs between servers?
thanks in advance
Hi
When I create a full text catalog via sql code, does the account the sql server is running under need any special permissions, since some files are created?
Or is it just the same as running any other sql code?
Thanks
in SQLServer2005 how can I allow update system catalogs (by mouseclick)?
View 59 Replies View RelatedIn 2000 there was a server level setting you could change in EM, to allow direct modifications to systems catalogs.
in 2005 I would like to update some sids in sysusers tables, do I also need to find and set this option first
I have a handful of databases that are enabled for Full-Text search. After investigating some recent performance issues, I discovered the FullText Catalogs needed to be reorganized. This is a task I knew I wanted to automate, without having to hard-code db names or catalog names. My first thought was to use sp_executesql with dynamic tsql strings. I was quite disappointed to realize that I couldn't use fully qualified names to run either of these commands:
ALTER FULLTEXT CATALOG [DBName].[SchemaName].[CatalogName] REORGANIZE
ALTER FULLTEXT CATALOG [DBName]..[CatalogName] REORGANIZE
My next thought was to create a stored proc on each user db that would do the re-orgs. Then I could have a sql job iterate through the db's and run the sp on each db. Thinking...Hmm...That's do-able, but I don't like it. Add a new db to the server, and I have to remember to create the sp. Relying on my memory to do something isn't always a good idea. Plus, if I have to fix/edit/enhance the sp, I get the pleasure of doing it multiple times on multiple servers. Too much work.
I came up with some code that would dynamically reorganize all the catalogs, but I had to run it while connected to a specific db. How do I run the code while connected to [master], but in the context of a different db? The undocumented proc [sp_MSforeachdb] came to mind. I'd never used it, and was reluctant to do so after reading about other dba's experiences with it. So I came up with my own derivitive, just for this one purpose. The code is below.
CREATE PROCEDURE dba.ReorganizeFullTextCatalogs
AS
/*
Purpose:
Reorganizes the FullText Catalogs (as needed) on all user databases.
Inputs: None
History:
02/25/2014DMasonCreated
*/
--This is the tsql statement that get executed on each db.
DECLARE @InnerSql NVARCHAR(MAX) =
'DECLARE @Tsql NVARCHAR(MAX)
[Code] ......
I would like to figure out a way to give access to QA's to run and View reports on SSISDB catalog without giving them SSISAdmin or SYSAdmin permisions.?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhen i am trying to update the data inside the ' sys.sql_modules' view, i am facing the following error:- 'Ad hoc updates to system catalogs are not allowed.' Is there any alternate way to update the data inside the ' sys.sql_modules' view?
View 2 Replies View Related SQL Server 2000 is pretty well documented with the limit of 256 (see http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa214780(SQL.80).aspx) but I can find no documentation anywhere that discusses the limit on SQL Server 2005.
Is there one ?
Please help !
Thanks
I need to modify a .dtsx that is inside ‘Integration Services Catalogs’; I tried right-clicking + exporting… But I only see ‘Configure’, ‘execute’ or validate options… I thought I could export it, directly from there, modify it and import it againNow I accessed the Integration Services from the same server name, and it’s not there… How can I find out, where is that package from? Or is there a way that I can export it directly from ssms?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI wanted to create a SSIS catalog and the way to create a catalog is to right click on "Integration Services Catalogs" node and select "Create Catalog" option.
However, I am not able to see the "Integration Services Catalogs" node in SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS) as shown in the following image.
What is missing so that I can see this node in SSMS?
FYI, I have SQL Server 2014 (Developer edition) and Integration Services 12.0 installed on my machine.
ProductVersion = 12.0.2269.0 (SELECT
SERVERPROPERTY('productversion') AS ProductVersion)
We are trying to restore from a backup (.bak) of a sql 2005 database with full text catologs to sql 2012.
We are getting errors saying that the backup file context are different from what we are trying to restore to, even if we try to create a new database from the backup.The new database is just a test database. The source is a production database with full cataologs.
The normal restore from a bak file does not seem to work.
We dont need the full text catalogs in the new database, but cannot change settings in the source production database.
Is there a way to take a backup of the sql 2005 database without the full text cataologs being included ? , without changing setting in the source database beforehand ?
I've searched the forum and saw that this question has been asked several times. However, none of the responses point to any documentation about this limit. We've got different groups bickering over this ("There is no limit!" "Yes there is!" "No there isn't!") and it would help to have a link on the MSDN or a response from Microsoft to this question to put this to rest once and for all. Also, if there is a limit, is that per Sql Server instance or per physical server?
Secondly, we currently have over 400 catalogs. We've noticed it takes 4-5 minutes for new data to show up in search results. Does the number of catalogs affect performance, or is it the amount of data, irrespective of catalog count?
Thanks
Hi!! I dont know if this is the correct forum for this or not, but still...Actually i wanted to know some details about SQl's Indexing services.
I found this link on my hosters help pages :
You need to use SQL Query Analyzer tool for this.
This will enable full-text indexing for the current database:exec sp_fulltext_database 'enable'
This creates a catalog:exec sp_fulltext_catalog 'catalogname', 'create'
This enables indexing of a table:exec sp_fulltext_table 'tablename', 'create','catalogname', 'indexname'
This adds a column to an index:exec sp_fulltext_column 'tablename', 'columnname', 'add'
This activates fulltext on a table:exec sp_fulltext_table 'tablename', 'activate'
These two enable automatic filling of the full-text index when changes occur to a table:exec sp_fulltext_table 'tablename','start_change_tracking'exec sp_fulltext_table 'tablename','start_background_updateindex'
From the above i get that i need to set up my database for indexing then make a catalog and then add an index of a table to this catalog. Can anyone point any good tutorials for using this is the proper way so that performance is not affected and tells me details on updating indexes etc(esp using some criterias). Moreover does indexing columns lower the performance? Is there a workaround? I am completely new to this.
What should I be looking at if I have real-time data (constant transactions) writing to a table that is experiencing index type problems? The table needs to constantly be re-indexed, which is slowing the whole transaction process down.
What can I look at or do to rectify this?
Thanks!