Fastest/best Way To Handle Update

Nov 5, 2004

I have a master table which has demographic data such as name, dob, location along with a primary key id. It will have about 10-12000 records. We get a refresh file every hour which may or may not have corrections for these records hourly with about 3,000 records. I put this data into a table. This data should be considered always to be correct. To handle the update to the master table I need to create an update process. I can take one of two approaches, just update all the records in the master table regardless if they are correct or not, or do some type of left join on those that do not match (in other words, only update the ones where thae names or dob don't match) There is an underlying update trigger on the patient master which will also fire if these values are changed. An opinions on a best approach?

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Fastest Way To Handle The Search

Jul 23, 2005

Hi!We have Sql Server 2000 in our server (NT 4). Our database have now about+350.000 rows with information of images. Table have lot of columnsincluding information about image name, keywords, location, price, colormode etc. So our database don?t include the images itself, just a path tothe location of every image. Keywords -field have data for example likethis:cat,animal,pet,home,child with pet,child. Now our search use Full-TextSearch which sounded like good idea in the beginning but now it have hadproblems that really reduce our search engine?s performance. Also searchresults are not exact enough. Some of our images have also photographer?sname in keywords -column and if photographer?s name is, for example, PeterMoss, his pictures appears in web-page when customer want to search "moss"(nature-like) -pictures.Another problem is that Full-Text Search started to be very slow when queryresult contains thousands of rows. When search term gives maximum 3000rows, search is fast but larger searches take from 6 to 20 seconds tofinish which is not good. I have noticed also that first search is alwaysvery slow, but next ones are faster. It seems that engine is just"starting" when first query started to run.Is there better and faster way to handle the queries? Is it better torebuild the database somehow and use another method to search than Full-Text Search? I don?t know how to handle the database other way when everyimage have about 10 to even 50 different keywords to search.We have made web interface and search code with Coldfusion. ColdfusionServer then take care of sending all queries to Sql Server.I hope that somebody have some idea how to speed up our picture search.--Message posted via http://www.sqlmonster.com

View 2 Replies View Related

Fastest Way To Update 20 + Million Records

Mar 19, 2008

Hello,
What is the fastest way to update 20million records in our database.
I have tried to do a simple update statement like this:
update trail_log with (tablockx, holdlock)
set trail_log .entry_by = users.user_identity
from users
where trail_log.entry_by = users.user_id

but it take 10 plus hours to run since it cannot commit the transactions until the very end. So was was thinking that I need to commit in batch like after 50K but that is slow as well.
Set rowcount 50000
Declare @rc int
Set @rc=50000
While @rc=50000
Begin
Begin Transaction
update trail_log With (tablockx, holdlock)
set trail_log.entry_by = users.user_identity
from users
where trail_log.entry_by = users.user_id
and trail_log.entry_by not like '%[0-9]%'
Select @rc=@@rowcount
--Commit the transaction
Commit
End
go
I have let the above statement run for 1.5 hours and it only update 450000 rows. Any ideas...
Maybe I'm doing it wrong. Please Help!!

View 1 Replies View Related

The Fastest Way To Perform An Update ... Advice Needed :)

Nov 12, 2006

Hi all,

I have a situation where my Visual C# application presents a number of fields. In order to update a student object, I wish to call a stored proc. 1 or more fields can be updated... And If one is left null, then I don't want to update it, but instead I want to keep the old value.

I am really wondering if I am approaching this the right way. The following stored proc does what I want it to do, however I'm thinking there may be a faster way...

Here it is:

-- Update a student, by ID.

DROP PROCEDURE p_UpdateStudent

CREATE PROCEDURE p_UpdateStudent

@ID INT,

@NewFName VARCHAR(25),

@NewOName VARCHAR(25),

@NewLName VARCHAR(25),

@NewDOB DATETIME,

@NewENumber VARCHAR(10),

@NewContactAID INT,

@NewContactBID INT

AS

BEGIN

SET NOCOUNT ON;

-- DECLARE THE OLD VALUES

DECLARE @FName AS VARCHAR(25)

DECLARE @OName AS VARCHAR(25)

DECLARE @LName AS VARCHAR(25)

DECLARE @DOB AS DATETIME

DECLARE @ENumber AS VARCHAR(10)

DECLARE @ContactAID AS INT

DECLARE @ContactBID AS INT

-- Get all of the old values

SELECT @FName = FName FROM TBL_Student WHERE ID = 10000

SELECT @OName = OName FROM TBL_Student WHERE ID = 10000

SELECT @LName = LName FROM TBL_Student WHERE ID = 10000

SELECT @DOB = DOB FROM TBL_Student WHERE ID = 10000

SELECT @ENumber = ENumber FROM TBL_Student WHERE ID = 10000

SELECT @ContactAID = ContactAID FROM TBL_Student WHERE ID = 10000

SELECT @ContactBID = ContactBID FROM TBL_Student WHERE ID = 10000



-- USE ISNULL to set all of the new parameters to the provided values only if they are not null

-- Keep the old ones otherwise.

SET @NewFName = ISNULL(@NewFName, @FName)

SET @NewOName = ISNULL(@NewOName, @OName)

SET @NewLName = ISNULL(@NewLName, @LName)

SET @NewDOB = ISNULL(@NewDOB, @DOB)

SET @NewENumber = ISNULL(@NewENumber, @ENumber)

SET @NewContactAID = ISNULL(@NewContactAID, @ContactAID)

SET @NewContactBID = ISNULL(@NewContactBID, @ContactBID)

-- Do the update

UPDATE TBL_Student

SET FName = @NewFName,

OName = @NewOName,

LName = @NewLName,

DOB = @NewDOB,

ENumber = @NewENumber,

ContactAID = @NewContactAID,

ContactBID = @NewContactBID

WHERE

ID = @ID

END

GO

So yeah it works. But As you can see I wish to keep an old copy of the values to perform checks pre update....

Is there any faster way, or am I on the right track? I need a pro's advice :) (before i write all of my procs!!)

Thanks all.



Chris





View 7 Replies View Related

Error Log Peppered With --&&> 'The Conversation Handle Is Missing. Specify A Conversation Handle.'

Dec 3, 2007

Hi

I'm using service broker and keep getting errors in the log even though everythig is working as expected

SQL Server 2005
Two databases
Two end points - 1 in each database
Two stored procedures:
SP1 is activated when a message enters the sending queue. it insert a new row in a table
SP2 is activated when a response is sent from the receiving queue. it cleans up the sending queue.

I have a table with an update trigger
In that trigger, if the updted row meets a certain condition a dialogue is created and a message is sent to the sending queue.
I know that SP1 and SP2 are behaving properly because i get the expected result.
Sp1 is inserteding the expected data in the table
SP2 is cleaning up the sending queue.

In the Sql Server log however i'm getting errors on both of the stored procs.
error #1
The activated proc <SP 1 Name> running on queue Applications.dbo.ffreceiverQueue output the following: 'The conversation handle is missing. Specify a conversation handle.'

error #2
The activated proc <SP 2 Name> running on queue ADAPT_APP.dbo.ffsenderQueue output the following: 'The conversation handle is missing. Specify a conversation handle.'

I would appreceiate anybody's help into why i'm getting this. have i set up the stored procs in correctly?

i can provide code of the stored procs if that helps.

thanks.

View 10 Replies View Related

Conversation Handle Reuse And Conversation Handle XXX Not Found

Jan 18, 2008



We have implemented our service broker architecture using conversation handle reuse per MS/Remus's recommendations. We have all of the sudden started receiving the conversation handle not found errors in the sql log every hour or so (which makes perfect sense considering the dialog timer is set for 1 hour). My question is...is this expected behavior when you have employed conversation recycling? Should you expect to see these messages pop up every hour, but the logic in the queuing proc says to retry after deleting from your conversation handle table so the messages is enqueued as expected?

Second question...i think i know why we were not receiving these errors before and wanted to confirm this theory as well. In the queuing proc I was not initializing the variable @Counter to 0 so when it came down to the retry logic it could not add 1 to null so was never entering that part of the code...I am guessing with this set up it would actually output the error to the application calling the queueing proc and NOT into the SQL error logs...is this a correct assumption?

I have attached an example of one of the queuing procs below:




Code Block
DECLARE @conversationHandle UNIQUEIDENTIFIER,
@err int,
@counter int,
@DialogTimeOut int,
@Message nvarchar(max),
@SendType int,
@ConversationID uniqueidentifier
select @Counter = 0 -- THIS PART VERY IMPORTANT LOL :)
select @DialogTimeOut = Value
from dbo.tConfiguration with (nolock)
where keyvalue = 'ConversationEndpoints' and subvalue = 'DeleteAfterSec'
WHILE (1=1)
BEGIN
-- Lookup the current SPIDs handle
SELECT @conversationHandle = [handle] FROM tConversationSPID with (nolock)
WHERE spid = @@SPID and messagetype = 'TestQueueMsg';
IF @conversationHandle IS NULL
BEGIN
BEGIN DIALOG CONVERSATION @conversationHandle
FROM SERVICE [InitiatorQueue_SER]
TO SERVICE 'ReceiveTestQueue_SER'
ON CONTRACT [TestQueueMsg_CON]
WITH ENCRYPTION = OFF;
BEGIN CONVERSATION TIMER ( @conversationHandle )
TIMEOUT = @DialogTimeOut
-- insert the conversation in the association table
INSERT INTO tConversationSPID
([spid], MessageType,[handle])
VALUES
(@@SPID, 'TestQueueMsg', @conversationHandle);

SEND ON CONVERSATION @conversationHandle
MESSAGE TYPE [TestQueueMsg] (@Message)

END
ELSE IF @conversationHandle IS NOT NULL
BEGIN
SEND ON CONVERSATION @conversationHandle
MESSAGE TYPE [TestQueueMsg] (@Message)
END
SELECT @err = @@ERROR;
-- if succeeded, exit the loop now
IF (@err = 0)
BREAK;
SELECT @counter = @counter + 1;
IF @counter > 10
BEGIN
-- Refer to http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms164086.aspx for severity levels
EXEC spLogMessageQueue 20002, 8, 'Failed to SEND on a conversation for more than 10 times. Error %i.'
BREAK;
END
-- We tried on the said conversation, but failed
-- remove the record from the association table, then
-- let the loop try again
DELETE FROM tConversationSPID
WHERE [spid] = @@SPID;
SELECT @conversationHandle = NULL;
END;

View 2 Replies View Related

What Is The Fastest Way To Do This

May 14, 2008

right now I have a stored procedure that goes through each of the Line and Body fields using a cursor. The problem is that this method is very slow. How would you experts solve this problem? any Hints or suggestions?


BEFORE
EXAMPLEPartLineBodySeriesEngineYear
11234A,BWETC1998
25678991,93,94,95WET01997
3345656S,R5,6,12WENC1995


AFTER
EXAMPLEPartLineBodySeriesEngineYear

11234AWETC1998
11234BWETC1998

25678991WET01997
25678993WET01997
25678994WET01997
25678995WET01997

3345656S5WENC1995
3345656S6WENC1995
3345656S12WENC1995
3345656R5WENC1995
3345656R6WENC1995
3345656R12WENC1995

View 4 Replies View Related

Is There Fastest Way To Encryption All SPs In All DBs?

Sep 29, 2000

Hi,
In my SQL server 7.0, I have got 250 store procedures in each database.
Before using them for my application, I want to ecyption all.
I must add "WITH ENCRYPTION" string in each SP in all database and it'll take me a long time. Is there fastest way to encryption all SPs in all DBs? Have anyone got an utility SP ( or anyway else) to do this?
Thanks in advance.

View 1 Replies View Related

Fastest INSERT

Mar 10, 2008

What is the fast way a stored procedure can copy a table from a linked server?

I would like to tune this statement, possibly with hints or other logging options. Assume that table_A and table_B have the exact table structure and that I want to preserve table_A and all its indexes and contraints. The table will be truncated before this load, if that helps in any way.

insert into table_A select * from OpenQuery(Server,'select * from Table_B')

TIA, Mike

View 4 Replies View Related

Fastest Way Of Updating A Row

Jul 20, 2005

In relation to my last post, I have a question for the SQL-gurus.I need to update 70k records, and mark all those updated in a specialcolumn for further processing by another system.So, if the record wasKey1, foo, foo, ""it needs to becomeKey1, fap, fap, "U"iff and only iff the datavalues are actually different (as above, foobecomes fap),otherwise it must becomeKey1, foo,foo, ""Is it quicker to :1) get the row of the destination table, inspect all valuesprogramatically, and determine IF an update query is neededOR2) just do a update on all rows, but addingand (field1 <> value1 or field2<>value2) to the update querythat isupdate myTablesetfield1 = "foo"markField="u"where key="mykey" and (field1 <> foo)The first one will not generate new update queries if the record hasnot changed, on account of doing a select, whereas the second versionalways runs an update, but some of them will not affect any lines.Will I need a full index on the second version?Thanks in advance,Asger Henriksen

View 2 Replies View Related

Fastest Data Transfer

Dec 26, 2000

Hi,
1)I need to transfer 500 gb of data from one server to other, which is faster, DTS/BCP/Restore.
2)Which are the best methods for checking blocking, dead locks & Indexes!

Thanks you all in advance

Richard..

View 5 Replies View Related

Fastest Backup Config ...

Feb 2, 2006

Hi,

I have a production server that has an 8Gb db. It is dual Xeon with 5x HDD - 2 mirrored and 3 striped. db on stripe, log and OS on mirror. 2x Gb network cards.

The application goes slow (ie users notice) when a backup is running so i have placed a crossover cable from one NIC to a test server so that it can back up to a HDD on that server, and then to tape. The test server has 2xGb NIC and the link between the two servers is on a seperate subnet to However, in the first trial of this the back up and verify takes 3 minutes longer.

Is this because the target server doesnt have a disk stripe?

What is the best config for the production server (ie will a slower backup but to another server be less load to contend with the application)?

thanks
Fatherjack

View 2 Replies View Related

Fastest Way To Copy Data?

May 22, 2007

I've got a view that is driven from a 80 million record table in a data warehouse. I am trying to populate an aggregate table in a datamart, but am running into preformance problems. The datamart table needs to be updated daily. I understand there are many factors that effect performance, but in general would the fastest approach be:
1) Truncate the datamart table
2) Perform a bcp of the view to a text file
3) Bulk Insert to the datamart table

If you need more information to answer this please let me know.

Thanks,

Matt

View 7 Replies View Related

Fastest Way To Deduplicate A List

Oct 21, 2007

Im trying to dedupe a table with only one field on it. The table has40 million records in it. What is the fastest way?1) create a table with a unque constraint on it insert into thattable?2) create a table without a unique constraint on it and use insertinto table select distinct un from table2?3) another way?Michael

View 1 Replies View Related

Fastest Connection Protocol?

Jan 10, 2008



Can anyone point to a reference which documents the pros and cons of the various connection protocols, such as Shared Memory vs. TCP/IP? I thought I saw something indicating that shared memory is fastest, which would explain why this protocol is tried first, but now I can't find it. This resource has information on creating connection strings, but not the advantages and disadvantages.

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms187662.aspx

View 7 Replies View Related

Fastest Way To Add New Instances To SQL 2005?

Jan 11, 2007

Hi,

I'd like to know the fastest way to add named instances to SQL server 2005 (I need to add 5 named instances)

Thank you!

John

View 4 Replies View Related

Fastest Connection Method?

Nov 17, 2006

I am trying to find some info on the fastest connection transport for an app that is running on the same box as a SQL 2005 instance. The app does a large number of updates (high volume of data).. win32 using native ODBC. I am trying to find info on which connection mechanism is best... socket, pipes, etc. I read somewhere that there is a file mapped method available but i cannot find info on that either. Also, is there any performance difference between the old SQL OCBD drive and the new SQL Native Client OCBD drive?

Thanks.

View 2 Replies View Related

Fastest Bulk Load

Jul 30, 2007

Hi All,

Im bulk loading a ton of data into MSSQL SERVER 2005 Standard Edition. I used to do this process in version 2000. It seems there is some more overhead in 2005. Is there a way to drop logging to almost null to speed up insert?

This is my current sql statment to load data.


EXEC sp_dboption 'my_stuff', 'select into/bulkcopy', 'true'

SET ANSI_WARNINGS OFF

BULK INSERT mystuff.dbo.[v1]

FROM 'c:myfile.txt'
WITH

(

FIRSTROW = 1,

FORMATFILE = 'c:scriptsv1.fmt',

MAXERRORS=2000,

ROWS_PER_BATCH=100000

)



Thanks,

Mike

View 2 Replies View Related

Fastest Way To Insert 4000+ Records

Nov 14, 2007

I'm writing a program that allows users to upload a csv file.  This file is then seperated into 4 datatables based on certain criteria then each datatable is uploaded into my database.  I'm essentially adding new rows to the datatables then running an update command on each using a tableadapter.  The problem is that these csv files can be large and can end up with 4000+ new records being added to the database and the update commands take a while to do it.  I've sat for about five minutes on one run while it updated.  I put in some time variable to see where all the time is spent and it takes only seconds to parse the data and seperate into the datatables, but minutes on the update commands.  Is there a more efficient way to insert this much data?

View 4 Replies View Related

Fastest Way To Extract Values From An XML Column

Mar 5, 2008

 Hi, I have a table with one XML type column. This column holds custom field information. Its used as a way of storing ad hoc fields and data that don't fit the DB design. <?xml version="1.0"?><contact><Reference>A39390TFH</Reference><Misc>all kinds of stuff go in here</Misc></contact>I want to provide a way of displaying the data stored in this column in the same DataTable as normal relational data from the same table. I have been able to achieve this goal BUT I want to know if the community had any ideas on how I could speed the process. I am using the XML  value() function. It allows me to extract the data I need.    SELECT Name, Number, Reference FROM

(

SELECT Name, Number, xmlvalues.value( ' (contact/Reference)[1] ', ' varchar(40) ' ) as Reference

From MyTable

WHERE Name = 'Some Dude'

AND xmlvalues is not null

) T

GROUP BY Name, Number, Reference anyone know if there are better xml functions to get this data out of the XMLColumn??????  There is no schema, because each xml fragment has different tags and different values.  Regards Niall 

View 1 Replies View Related

Which Is The Fastest Way To JOIN Having Millions Of Records?

Mar 15, 2004

If there is 13 million records in one table and 40 thousand records in another table then what is the fastest way of joining these two tables????

This was a question to me from somebody to which i cudn't answer back properly. Cud anybody tell the answer with properreasons behind the answer??????

Thanx.

View 7 Replies View Related

Fastest Way To Remove Large Table?

Nov 22, 1999

We have a table that we BCP into, the data is then processed and inserted into its appropriate table.
Then the table or its data needs to be removed. This seems to be a very slow operation to remove
the table or table data. I have tried drop table, and truncate table and it takes nearly as long as
the bcp operation. The table has 12 million rows. I didn't think either operation wrote to the
transaction log except for page extent management. Why is the drop and truncate so slow. Suggestions?

View 1 Replies View Related

Fastest Way To Build A Database Out Of SQL Scripts

Jul 23, 2005

What is the fastest way to generate an SQL 2000 databaseout of SQL scripts.The SQL scripts contain the create tables, views, storedprocedures, triggers, constraints, and the tables DATArecords.What are my options? isql? osql? are there other ways?Thank you

View 6 Replies View Related

Fastest Way To Insert Range/sequence

Jul 20, 2005

I'd like to use a stored procedure to insert large amounts of recordsinto a table. My field A should be filled with a given range ofnumbers. I do the following ... but I'm sure there is a better(faster) way:select @start = max(A) from tbl where B = 'test1' and C = 'test2'while @start <= 500000begininsert into tbl (A, B, C)values (@start, 'test1', test2')set @start = @start +1endanother question is, how to prevent that another user inserts the samenumbers into the field A?Thanks a lot for any help!ratu

View 5 Replies View Related

The Fastest Way To Drop A Data Base

Jul 31, 2007

Hi All,

I have NUnit tests. on each test I create a temp db with data and drop it in the end of the test.
Since I have several connections to it during the test, I do "set single_user" on the db and then drop because I can't drop it while others are connected. ("Other" menas other connections)
This takes quite some time. tried detach but no improvements.

What would be the fastest way to drop a database?

Thanks
Avi

View 3 Replies View Related

The Fastest Way To Load String Data

Jul 10, 2006

I need to load a lot of data into a sql table as fast as possible. (All data is string data, CSV file). I have read that the "fastest" way to load data is using the "Fast Load" option of the OLEDB Destination but I have also read that the "SQL Server" Destination is fast.

1. Is there a general consensus as to which way is the quicksest load?

2. The file is a CSV file. Would a fixed-format file be faster to read?



TIA,



barkingdog

View 3 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: Fastest Way To Populate A Column With -1 Value

Aug 13, 2015

I have a big table (> 40,000,000 rows) in SQL Server 2008 R2 database . I added new column of type int to the table. What is the fastest way to populate the column with -1 value. The table can be locked.

View 2 Replies View Related

Fastest Way To Do Large Amounts Of Updates

Mar 3, 2006

I was wondering what is the fastest way to UPDATE lots of recods. I heard the fastest way to perform lots of inserts in to use SqlCeResultSet. Would this also be the fastest way to update already existing records? If so, is this the fastest way to do that:

1. Create a SqlCeCommand object.
2. Set the CommandText to select the datat I want to update
3. Call the command object's ExecuteResultSet method to create a SqlCeResultSet object
4. Call the result set object's Read method to advance to the next record
5. Use the result set object to update the values using the SqlCeResultSet.SetValue method and the Update method.
6. repeat steps 4 and 5

Also I was wondering do call the SqlCeResultSet.Update method once per row, or just once? Also would it be possible and faster to wrap all that in a transaction?

Would parameterized updates be faster?
Any help will be appreciated.

View 3 Replies View Related

What Is The Fastest Way To Add New Named Instances To SQL 2005?

Jan 11, 2007

Hello SQL colleagues,

I need to add 5 new named instances on a SQL Server 2005 Enterpise Edition.

Is there a fast way to do it?

Best Regards,

John

View 3 Replies View Related

Indexing - What Is Fastest? Numeric Or Alpha Fields?

Jul 27, 2006

If I create an index on a field in SQL Server, what will be the most efficient (fastest) field type to index a field?  (This field will be a "Pointer" to a child table that will contain a list of codes, and their description.)
Would a Numeric field be quicker than a VarChar field?
VarChar would make it easier for a Human to decipher the raw records.  (For example, if I used a numeric the code would be 42 or 47, while the VarChar could be 'savings' or 'checking'.)
Basically I will have the following "Master" table: FieldType
---------
IDInt
NameVarChar
StatusInt -or- VarChar
Customer_TypeInt -or- VarChar
 If Customer_Type is a code that can be looked up in another table, and I index that field, would I want the "Code" to be an Int or VarChar?
SQL: Select *
From Master
Where Customer_Type = <42> or <'savings'>
 My Where clause would depend on the field type.
Thank you,   Bryan

View 1 Replies View Related

How Can We Tune The Fastest Speed For The Gateway Between ASP.NET And MsSQL??

Mar 29, 2004

ASP.NET and MsSQL are run inside the same machine, and inside win2000 server,
and the physical memory limit of mssql is set to 192MB.


any one have any good idea(s)? please share to us here


:)

View 4 Replies View Related

The Fastest Normal ADO.NET Or Microsoft Best Practise EnterpriseLibrary

May 12, 2006

So I got 2 classes one I wrote to interrogate databases using normal ADO:Mine:SqlConnection myConnection = new SqlConnection(m_sConnectionString);SqlCommand myCommand = new SqlCommand(sQuery, myConnection);myCommand.CommandTimeout = 120; // 60 Seconds TimeoutmyConnection.Open();SqlDataReader result = myCommand.ExecuteReader(CommandBehavior.CloseConnection);return result;Microsoft WaySqlDatabase dbSvc = new SqlDatabase(m_sConnectionString);DbCommand dbCommand = dbSvc.GetSqlStringCommand(sQuery);return ((SqlDataReader)dbSvc.ExecuteReader(dbCommand));What's faster?My way:SqlConnection myConnection = new SqlConnection(m_sConnectionString);SqlCommand myCommand = new SqlCommand(sQuery, myConnection);myCommand.CommandTimeout = 120; // 60 Seconds Timeout// Use a DataTable – required for default pagingSqlDataAdapter myAdapter = new SqlDataAdapter(myCommand);DataTable myTable = new DataTable();myAdapter.Fill(myTable);myConnection.Close();myConnection.Dispose();myConnection = null;return (myTable);Microsoft Way:SqlDatabase dbSvc = new SqlDatabase(m_sConnectionString);DbCommand dbCommand = dbSvc.GetSqlStringCommand(sQuery);DataTable dtData = null;DataSet dsData = dbSvc.ExecuteDataSet(dbCommand);dtData = dsData.Tables[0];return (dtData);Comments? Ideas?Al

View 4 Replies View Related

Fastest Way To Move Huge Table Across Servers

Mar 23, 2008

Hi Guys,

What is the fast way to move huge table (77 million) records with 25 columns across servers? The servers are not linked though.

Thanks for the help.

View 3 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved