Find Instances When Sum Of Three Claims Types Greater Than Predetermined Threshold
Jan 30, 2015
I have a table that is made up of the sum of medical, mental health and pharmacy claims. I would like to query that to find instances when the sum of the three claims types are greater than a predetermined threshold.
For example:
Patient 1 Medical = 10,000 (could be 10 records at 1,000 each)
Patient 1 Mental Health = 5,000
Patient 1 Pharmacy = 15,000
Patient 2 Medical = 1,000
Patient 2 Mental Health = 0
Patient 2 Pharmacy = 500
Threshold is 25,000
If I queried the above sample table I would get one record:
Patient 1 30,000 - because 10,000+5,000+15,000 = 30,000 and is greater than the threshold.
I am not sure that a having clause would work though.
Does anyone know how to query a field in a table where it contains anASCII code >= 128 - without looping through every field for everyrecord in table (using charindex)?Ex of char I would like to find: ü which is char(252)
My basic situation is this - I ONLY want duplicates, so the oppositeof DISTINCT:I have two tables. Ordinarily, Table1ColumnA corresponds in a one toone ratio with Table2ColumnB through a shared variable. So if I queryTableB using the shared variable, there really should only be onrecord returned. In essence, if I run this and return TWO rows, it isvery bad:select * from TableB where SharedVariable = 1234I know how to join the tables on a single record to see if this is thecase with one record, but I need to find out how many, among possiblymillions of records this affects.Every record in Table1ColumnA (and also the shared variable) will beunique. There is another column in Table1 (I'll call itTable1ColumnC) that will be duplicated if the record in Table2 is aduplicate, so I am trying to use that to filter my results in Table1.I am looking to see how many from Table1 map to DUPLICATE instances inTable2.I need to be able to say, in effect, "how many unique records inTable1ColumnA that have a duplicate in Table1ColumnC also have aduplicate in Table2ColumnB?"Thanks if anyone can help!-- aknoch
I am trying to find all instances of a string that contain the letters FSC. While I am able to find most of them, I am unable to find the ones wrapped in double quotes.
Query example:
Select * from myTable Where item like '%FSC%'
This works great with the exception of when FSC is surrounded by double quotes.
I have Two Database that exist on Two seperate servers. The two database contain same schema and contains tables and columns of same name. Some tables have slight differences in terms of data types or Data type lenght.
For example if a Table on ServerA has a column named - CustomerSale with Varchar (100, Null) and a table on ServerB has a column named CustomerSale with Varchar (60, Null), how can i find if other columns have similar differences in all tables with the same name and columns in the two servers.
I am using SQL Server 2005. And the Two Servers are Linked Servers
What Script can i use to accomplish this task. Thanks
One of my varchar columns in a table has multiple key words enclosed in a pattern of special characters.
Eg: William Shakespeare was an English [##poet##], [##playwright##], and [##actor##], widely regarded as the greatest [##writer##] in the English language and the world's pre-eminent [##dramatist##]. He is often called England's national [##poet##] and the "Bard of Avon". His extant works, including some collaborations, consist of about 38 plays, 154 [##sonnets##], two long narrative [##poems##], and a few other [##verses##], of which the authorship of some is uncertain. His plays have been translated into every major living language and are performed more often than those of any other [##playwright##].
I need to write to query to find all distinct key words that are enclosed within [## and ##]. My query should yield the following results from the string in the example above
[##actor##] [##dramatist##] [##playwright##] -- 2 occurrances, but I need it only once in my result set [##poems##] [##poet##] -- 2 occurrances, but I need it only once in my result set [##sonnets##] [##verses##] [##writer##]
I need to run this on a large table, so I am looking for the best possible way to minimize any performance issues.
Just give you sample code, I have provided below 2 separate snippets, one with table variable and another with temp table.
DECLARE @MyTable TABLE (MyString VARCHAR (8000)) INSERT @MyTable VALUES ('William Shakespeare was an English [##poet##], [##playwright##], and [##actor##], widely regarded as the greatest [##writer##] in the English language and the world''s pre-eminent [##dramatist##]. He is often called England''s national [##poet##] and the "Bard of Avon". His extant works, including some collaborations, consist of about 38 plays, 154 [##sonnets##], two long narrative [##poems##], and a few other [##verses##], of which the authorship of some is uncertain.
this is not making a whole lot of sense to me. I am trying to do this very simple query:
SELECT ID FROM Equipment WHERE CMMS_ID=@EqNum
This is inside a cursor where I select from an oracle datasource. @EqNum is declared as an nvarchar(15), after selecting into it from the cursor I print the variable and it reads:
000000000015552
perfect. But when it executes against the above query I get no results. However, if I execute the following query manually
SELECT ID FROM Equipment WHERE CMMS_ID='000000000015552'
it returns results. Aren't these supposed to be exactly the same??? Why am I not getting results when I use the variable? Also CMMS_ID column is an nvarchar(15) column.
Is this weird or what? Is oracle really returning something different than is what is printing??
Hi all, I have a test DB that when suspect on a box that had a disk I/O problem. Got that repaired, no I am looking at trying to bring up the DB. We need this db back, and yes, no backups. Win2k box with SQL2k SP3
Problem I am having is getting DBCC to do any repairs. I can do a DBCC CHECKDB and of course see the errors. When I try to run any type of DBCC repair I get the old Repair statement not processed. Database needs to be in single user mode. I have confirmed that the DB is in fact in single user mode, both in the Manager and QA, Even went so far as to start the entire server in single user mode yet still get the error.
I have two dbs that I am trying to recover and they both bark out the same errors.
Any pointers as to where I am going wrong?
Thanks, Chris
PS Commands I am using.
use master go dbcc checkdb ('dbname', 'repair_rebuild') ******************* Use master go sp_dboption dbname, single, true ******************* UPDATE SYSDATABASES SET STATUS=-32768 WHERE NAME='dbname'
When I am in Visual Studio 2005, and I try to add an SQL database, I get the following error "generating user instances in sql server is disabled. use sp_configure user instances enabled to generate user instances." I am currently using SQL server 2005 Express. What do I need to do, to create an SQL database? Thanks in advance.
I created a Calculated measure in cube something like this : ([TransType].[TransTypeHierarchy].[TransTypeCategoryParent].&[SPEND],[Measures].[Transaction Amount]). To get only spend transactions. Now, I want to slice this measure with same hierarchy to find the amount distribution across different transaction types under spend transaction. But this query behaving like the measure doesn't have relation with measure.
you can think this as below query: WITH MEMBER SPEND AS ([TransType].[TransTypeHierarchy].[TransTypeCategoryParent].&[SPEND],[Measures].[Transaction Amount]) SELECT NON EMPTY {SPEND} ON 0 ,NON EMPTY ([TransType].[TransTypeHierarchy].[TransTypeCategoryParent]) ON 1 FROM [CUBE]
is there any threshold manager in the ms sql server? like in the transaction log, where you can add a stored proc that will dump the tran log everytime a threshold is hit.
This doesn't make any sense. I am trying to install SQL Server 2005 on SBS 2003 with Service Pack 1. According to Windows Update, there is nothing left for me to install. However, I am getting this error (while installing SQL Server Express and the Developer Edition):
"Your operating system does not meet Service Pack level requirements for this SQL Server release. Install the Service Pack from the Microsoft Download Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=50380, and then run SQL Server setup again."
When I go to the link, there is nothing there to download (it takes me to the main Microsoft download page). I meet all the requirements that I have found. What gives?
I have a table with 188376 rows and the data size = 3012 KB, index size = 5884 KB . LE threshold max is set to 2000 and LE threshol percent to 20% I have an index on that table and observed that it is not getting used. I would like to know whether sql optimizer uses the index based on the cost of the query plan or does the table scan once the LE thresholdlimit is reached overriding the optimized plan.
Guys I am really stuck on this one. Any help or suggestions would beappreciated.We have a large table which seemed to just hit some kind of threshold.They query is somewhat responsive when there are NO indexes on thetable. However, when we index email the query takes forever.FACTS- The problem is very "data specific". I can not recreate theproblem using different data.- There is only a problem when I index email on the base table.- The problem goes away when I add "AND b.email IS NOT NULL" to theinner join condition. It does not help when I add the logic to the"WHERE" clause.DDLCREATE TABLE base (bk char(25), email varchar(100))create clustered index icx on base(bk)create index ix_email on base(email)CREATE TABLE filter (bk char(25), email varchar(100))create clustered index icx on filter (bk)create index ix_email on filter (email)QuerySELECT b.bk, b.emailFROM base b WITH(NOLOCK)INNER JOIN filter f ON f.email = b.email--and f.email is not nullData Profile--35120500, 35120491, 14221553SELECT COUNT(*) ,COUNT(DISTINCT bk), COUNT(DISTINCT email)FROM base--16796199, 16796192, 14221553SELECT COUNT(*) ,COUNT(DISTINCT bk), COUNT(DISTINCT email)FROM baseWHERE email IS NOT NULL--250552, 250552, 250205SELECT COUNT(*) ,COUNT(DISTINCT bk), COUNT(DISTINCT email)FROM filter--250208, 250208, 250205SELECT COUNT(*) ,COUNT(DISTINCT bk), COUNT(DISTINCT email)FROM filterWHERE email IS NOT NULL
I've been writing this stuff for a while, and can't seem to come to the conclusion of how I should be retrieving data and assigning this data to variables.
Since i'm using SQL Server, I'm convinced that I should be using the datareaders GetSqlDouble (or whatever) function, but this would mean i need my local variables to be one of the SQL types. The problem with that is, that there will have to be lots of conversions done by me to be able to use a SQL type in my application.
For instance, I have a class where i'm retrieving dates. In order to retrieve them correctly (Null values included), I need to retrieve them with GetSqlDateTime(), then when it comes time to display the date in a table, i must first check for nulls, then convert to a string. This seems to be very cumbersome. Would I be better off just using GetDateTime(), and the .ToString method, and ignoring Sql Types all together?
so, basically, how are you guys using your sql server data? with the supplied sql types, and doing all of the post-processing work manually? I feel like i'm having trouble conveying my issue...hopefully someone knows what i mean....i'd just like some direction to save trouble in the long run, since i feel like there's got to be a better way...
I had a server with SQL Server 7.0 I installed a named instance of SQL Server 2000 and then i passed all my DB of the 7.0 instance to the 2000 instance. Then i removed the 7.0 instance, that was the default instance. So at the moment there is only the 2000 version, but it isn't the default instance Can the 2000 instance become the default instance? (So that clients can connect to it simply through computer name, and not creating an alias)
Hi allI have a large data set of points situated in 3d space. I have a simpleprimary key and an x, y and z value.What I would like is an efficient method for finding the group ofpoints within a threshold.So far I have tested the following however it is very slow.---------------select *from locations a full outer join locations bon a.ID < b.ID and a.X-b.X<2 and a.Y-b.Y<2 and a.Z-b.Z<2where a.ID is not null and b.ID is not null---------------If anyone knows of a more efficient method to arrive at this results itwould be most appreciated.Thanks in advanceBevan
I am doing workload analysis on SSAS - Tabular (2012), I have perfmon logs captured and want to run through PAL. I am looking out for threshold file for SSAS tabular 2012/2014.Â
The below stored procedure is used to create a vertical benchmark line on the X-Axis which has a hour scale. I use the stored procedure to find out which temperature crosses or equals the threshold temperature (340), then plot the vertical benchmark line at the hour the first temperature is equal to or greater than 340 degrees and less than 1000 degrees.
The logic below works if the temperature is equal to or greater than 340 degrees and less than 1000 degrees. THE ISSUE is I have 8 temperatures if they don't cross the threshold of 340 degrees I need to set a default value for my vertical line. In other words if the temperature is 180 and my threshold is 340 then set my vertical line on the highest temperature close to 340.
I tried removing my Where clause (but then it breaks the logic for those temperatures that are equal to or greater than 340). I tried using Case When but this didn't give me what I want either. I tried UNION as well. All giving me results I don't want.
Here is what I am looking for:
This first example is one where there was a temperature that was equal to or greater than the threshold of 340 degrees. This is CORRECT
If 8 temperatures did not equal or cross the threshold then give me the hour of the highest temperature close to the threshold but do not return 0.
For Example:
temp1 92 temp2 108 temp3 0 temp4 284 <<< this is the closest to the threshold so give me the hour when this occurred. temp5 2192 *Remember I can only count temperatures less than 1000 degrees. Anything above 1000 degrees mean there is nothing in the oven. So it is false/positive. temp6 102 temp7 0 temp8 12
Code: CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[AgeScoreCardThreshold_JJ_12232013] -- Add the parameters for the stored procedure here @LicenseNumber int = NULL, @Lot varchar(50) = NULL
According to BOL you can configure an Alert to notify you when the blocked process threshold has been exceeded:
SQL Server 2005 Books Online
blocked process threshold Option
Use the blocked process threshold option to specify the threshold, in seconds, at which blocked process reports are generated. The threshold can be set from 0 to 86,400. By default, no blocked process reports are produced. This event is not generated for system tasks or for tasks that are waiting on resources that do not generate detectable deadlocks. For more information about deadlock detection, see Detecting and Ending Deadlocks.
You can define an alert to be executed when this event is generated. So for example, you can choose to page the administrator to take appropriate action to handle the blocking situation.
Can someone provide some direction on exactly how this is done? Does it require a Service Broker and queue?
Referencing an article regarding MAXDOP and cost threshold for parallelism from Brent Ozar's website: [URL] .....
We have a 2 physical CPUs that are 4 cores each with hyper threading enabled. When looking through the task manager, under the performance tab, I see 16 CPU threads.We have set the MAXDOP value is set at 4.
Reading further, cost threshold for parallelism setting is recommended at 50 to start with.
I am trying to script a case when to achieve the following.
I have a table of measures with certain threshold. The threshold direction can either be > or < so I want to create a field that shows if the measure hits that threshold or not to be later picked up in SSRS. So a nested case when?
CASE WHEN M.[Threshold Direction] = '>' THEN CASE WHEN A.[Value] > M.[Threshold] THEN 'GREEN' CASE WHEN A.[Value] < M.[Threshold] THEN 'RED' ELSE '' END END END AS 'Condition'Is this at all possible?
I´m exporting an ms-excel file, then I use a lookup transformation to get a field from a SQL Server 2005 table. The Lookup transformation editor, after selecting the table, shows a warning that says:
at least one mapping between a column from available input columns ans a column from available lookup columns must be defined on the columns page.
So I try to make a relationship in the Lookup transformation editor's column tab where I find the Available input columns and the available lookup columns but I get the following error:
The following columns cannot be mapped: [Department, DEP_CLEGALCODE] One or more columns do not have supported data types, or their data types do not match.
The field in SLQ Server is varchar(10) and the input field is a derived column transformation; I have tried different Data Types but I always have the same error.
The DataFlow is: ExcelSource --> Derived Column --> Lookup --> Flat file destination
I have a stored proc. in that proc i need to select a value based on which one is greater. Here is a non working example
select name, if (truck1.age > truck2.age, truck1.age, truck2.age) from person left join truck truck1 on truck1.make = person.make left join truck truck2 on truck2.make = person.make
I have a table which measures the changes in a feedback rating, measured by an integer. Most of my records are the same. Only the primary key & the timestamp change.
How do I query just the changes?
Example dataset:
idrating 15 25 35 45 56 66
[code]....
There are 20 rows & 5 changes. The query I want will result in just those that are different from the ones before them:
I was comparing diffrent columns and within those columns there are specific values. I want to get the greter values using SQL 2000 i want something like these but i think there was an error in scripting
CASE WHEN a > b,c,d,e THEN a WHEN b > a,c,d,e THEN b WHEN c > a,b,d,e THEN c WHEN d > a,b,c,e THEN d WHEN e > a,b,c,d THEN e END
Please help. Is there any possible way to implement this? Thank you.
