Foreign Key Conflict
Sep 24, 2004
Hi;
I have 2 tables Users and DVDTestResults these tables have a relation over UserID
Users.UserID
DVDTestResults.UserName
both char
But when I try to insert in DVDTestResults I am having an error:
INSERT statement conflicted with COLUMN FOREIGN KEY constraint 'FK_DVDTestResults_Users'. The conflict occurred in database 'Test', table 'Users', column 'UserID'. The statement has been terminated.
can you help me why?
thank you....
View 7 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jan 21, 2007
Hi,
I am fairly new to SQL server Express and I have quite a simple database set up and I am trying to test it out with data. I have €śPain Reading€? and €śWorsen Factors€? tables with a 1: M relationship. The primary key in the Pain reading table is ReadingID which is being set using getdate() for the default value. I am getting the following error when attempting to add a new row to the €śWorsen Factors€? table:
No row was updated
The data in row 1 was not committed.
Error source:.Net SqlClient Data Provider
Error Message: The insert statement conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint "FK_WorsenFactor_PainReading1". The confilct occurred in database "paindata", table "dbo.PainReading", column 'ReadingID'.
The statement has been terminated.
Any help or suggestions would be very helpful.
Thanks
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 21, 2006
there have a exception when I trying to run a insert query
the exception is occur on cmd.ExecuteReder(); and shows
Insert Query conflict with Foreign key..
why? and how to resolve it?
thank you
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 19, 2005
I'm trying to create relational database with some triggers in SQL Server 7.0, but it doesn't work as expected. Let's say that I have 'Office' database with two tables, 'Users' and 'UserRights' (userRights table should have much more rights, but that's not relevant for this problem):
CREATE TABLE [Users] (
[FS_Username] [nvarchar] (8) NOT NULL ,
[FS_Password] [nvarchar] (32) NOT NULL ,
CONSTRAINT [PK_Users] PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED
(
[FS_Username]
) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
CREATE TABLE [UserRights] (
[FS_Username] [nvarchar] (8) NOT NULL ,
[FI_UserType] [int] NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_UserRights_FI_UserType] DEFAULT (1),
[FI_AllowLogin] [int] NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_UserRights_FI_AllowLogin] DEFAULT (1),
CONSTRAINT [PK_UserRights] PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED
(
[FS_Username]
) ON [PRIMARY] ,
CONSTRAINT [FK_UserRights_Users] FOREIGN KEY
(
[FS_Username]
) REFERENCES [Users] (
[FS_Username]
)
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
Foreign Key CONSTRAIN above is created by adding both tables to the diagram and defining relationship between these two tables FS_Username field, where 'Enable relationship for INSERT and UPDATE' option is turned ON. You can easily see this if you create diagram youself and insert these two tables in it.
Next to this, I created two triggers that should handle inserting/deleting rows in UserRights table as consequence of inserting/deleting rows in Users table:
CREATE TRIGGER InsertUserRights ON Users
FOR INSERT
AS
BEGIN
INSERT INTO UserRights (FS_Username) (SELECT FS_Username FROM Inserted)
END
CREATE TRIGGER DeleteUserRights ON Users
FOR DELETE
AS
BEGIN
DELETE UserRights WHERE FS_Username IN
(SELECT FS_Username FROM Users)
END
Now, when (manually) I insert row in Users table, UserRights table gets updated accordingly. HOWEVER, when I try to delete one or more entries from Users table, I get error report. For example, if you try to execute following two commands:
Insert Into Users (FS_Username, FS_Password) VALUES ('John', 's')
Delete from Users
... first command will succede, but second one will fail with message:
DELETE statement conflicted with COLUMN REFERENCE constraint 'FK_UserRights_Users'. The conflict occurred in database 'Office', table 'UserRights', column 'FS_Username'.
The statement has been terminated.
Does anyone know how to resolve this problem without loosing constrains and triggers ? (If I turn off 'Enable relationship for INSERT and UPDATE' option for relationship, things will work fine, but than I can make inconsistent data in UserRights table).
tnx a lot,
Dejan
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 7, 2002
Hi!
Does anybody know if there are any conflicts using an XP computer as server and running SQL 7.0 on it?
I have a laptop using Windows XP, that I also have installed SQL 7.0 on (desktop version). I use it both as a client and as a server. As a client I am connecting to the NT server and it is working perfectly. When I try to run my SQL developed software against the local server though, I get a message saying
"-2147217900 - Duplicate record or Record is in use.
The request for procedure "TABLE NAME" failed because "TABLE NAME" is a table object"
Any suggestions how to solve this?
thanx in advance
/Corinne
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 28, 2007
why do i get collation conflict when i used temp table ??Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Latin1_General_CI_AI" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.i solved it by using COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS (the column name)will i have collation conflicts again when i put my web app on a web hosting company??
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 10, 2004
Hi All;
I am getting ;
INSERT statement conflicted with TABLE FOREIGN KEY constraint 'FK_ChecklistCases_ChecklistFGroups'. The conflict occurred in database 'Test', table 'ChecklistFGroups'. The statement has been terminated.
but it seems to be no error can you help me please I can send you the related part of database
thank you
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 7, 2005
I am doing this in SQL Query analyzer:select dbo.GetTimedifference(CAST('5:30 PM' AS DATETIME),CAST('12:00 PM' AS DATETIME))it will give me (- 05:30) which is correct if i am talking about 12:00 PM midnight, what if I ment 12:00 PM in the noon, I mean, 11:00 AM, then 12:00 PM, it should give me, (5:30)since 5:30 Pm is 5:30 hours pass 12:00 PM noon, how can I solve that ?thanks a lot.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2001
Hi
I'm using merge replication between 10 SQL server 7.0 SP2 machines. One central server is the publisher and 9 subscribers. I’ve setup an alert to get a message in case of conflicts. I defined it to trigger everytime the performance counter conflicts/sec rises above 0.
After some experimenting this seems now to work reliable, but there is still one point which bothers me. All conflicts are kept in the conflict history and everytime I get a message through the alert the number of copnflicts stated in the message increases by one.
Also if I open view replication conflicts in EM all conflicts can still be viewed even those I manually resolved. I can't even find a way to seen which conflicts are new ones and which have been resolved already. Does anybody know a way how to reset this numbers without going through all the conflict tables.
Markus
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 9, 2004
I have a database thats got sql as the engine and access 2000 for the client side. and every time I edit a record this "Write Conflict" comes up. I dont know why its doing that but Idont want that happening whent the database goes live and my users start editing records. what do I, apparently its a Replication Conflict
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jul 22, 2004
has anyone had sucess in troubleshooting conflicts between these two?
I need to shut down the sybase client on a machine that is running MS SQL if thats possible.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 2, 2006
Hi all,
I have a db server which was installed with Collation 'SQL_Latin_General_CP1_CS_AS' and now I have to replace this server with a new server and I want to install this server with Collation 'SQL_Latin_General_CP1_CI_AS'.
I am using Linked Servers to collect some data from my Sybase database which has "Code Page 850 (Multilingual) character set,us_english,Binary ordering, for use with Code Page 850 (cp850)."
But with new SQL server(case-insensitive settings), I am unable to run a select query (joining a local server and sybase server) and I get an error message "cannot resolve collation conflict for equal to operation"
I have tried changing property of linked server by specifying Remote server collation to true and Collation Name as 'SQL_Latin_General_CP1_CS_AS' as well as 'SQL_Latin_General_CP850_Bin' but I do get the same error message.
Could any of you please help me in this regard ?
Thanks in advance.
Wilson
Edit: Sorted out. Somehow it is working now after specifying Remote server collation to true and Collation Name as 'SQL_Latin_General_CP1_CS_AS'
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 8, 2007
Moving code from Sybase to SQL Server 2005. I have two tables. One table (vINID) is reset and populated right before this code runs. The other table (vINPA) is a table in the database used by the Front End App. This is the error I get when I try and run on our SQL Server 2005.
Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Line 1
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_BIN" in the equal to operation.
Here is the SQL code:
SELECT DISTINCT
vINID.BLEI_CK,
vINID.BLIV_ID,
ISNULL(vINPA.RCPT_AMT,0) AS RCPT_AMT
FROM Reporting_DEV.dbo.RPT_04597_INID AS vINID -- table re-populated
LEFT JOIN fauafpr0_pids.dbo.CDS_INPA_PMT_ACT AS vINPA
ON vINPA.BLIV_ID = vINID.BLIV_ID
WHERE vINID.BLIV_ID = '071600007594'
Thank you for your help.
David
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 15, 2004
i have converted an access database to SQL
and now when i add a record and then later go back to change the new data it says that their is a write conflict
ne ideas????
thanks
Kris
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 30, 2005
All,
How do I solve a primary key conflict for a mutiple select statement.
When SQL finds a duplicate entry I doesn't ignore it like access but it doesn't insert anything.
It should be something like where not in.....
Thanks in advance
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[z_qry_history_1_is]
AS
INSERT INTO r_tbl_history_is_rg ( ean_code, contractnr, switch_id, bakje, week, jaar )
SELECT distinct r_tbl_is_open.ean_code,
r_tbl_is_open.transaction_id,
r_tbl_is_open.switch_id,
r_tbl_is_open.bakje, datepart(ww,getdate()) AS Expr1, datepart(yyyy,getdate()) AS Expr2
FROM r_tbl_is_open;
GO
Violation of PRIMARY KEY constraint 'aaaaar_tbl_history_is_rg_PK'. Cannot insert duplicate key in object 'r_tbl_history_is_rg'.
The statement has been terminated.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 5, 2007
While I execute one query its showing this error:
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Arabic_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.
Can help me please!
Shaji
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 14, 2008
I have merge replication set with with one publisher and three subscribers (push subscription). From time to time I get the following in the conflict table:
"The same row was updated at both 'Publisher.database' and 'Subscriber.database'. The resolver chose the update from 'Publisher.database' as the winner"
This is weird because the UPDATE only happend at the given subscriber. I checked the publisher and all other subscribers and there was never an UPDATE on this table. Also, the update at the publisher was actually the record that was already present.
I'm kinda stuck here. Any help or comments are greatly appreciated.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
i have a dts package that is going to run at night and pull data from2 tables in an Oracle db and load it to 2 staging tables that mypackage creates in sql server 2000. i then execute a few sprocs toand columns, indexes, etc. after that all happens successfully i wantto delete the two production tables and rename the staging tables totake their place.the problem is that when i run the sproc to add the indexes,constraints, etc i get an error because objects with the same nameexist on the 2 production tables. i can't delete the productiontables until the very last step. i thought about generating a randomnumber in my sproc and using it as the name of the index but thatseems crude and messy. any ideas?
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2006
I am running merge replication on SQL Server 2005. Included in replication are 6 Subscribers and one Publisher/Distributor. Replication compatibility level is SQL 2005 and I am using row-level tracking. Servers are synchronized in 5 minutes each (so gap between two consecutive syncs of one server is 30 minutes)
Earlier all of this was on compatibility level SQL 2000, since all servers were upgraded from 2000 to 2005. But 10 days ago I upgraded and replication compatibility to 2005. I did not initialize subscription, since I had data in place and db's ready for merge replication.
Since that 10 days ago I have column update conflict on each row change. Not just if it is changed at same time at different subscribers. For example, if I change one row today, and somebody else changes it three days later on other subscriber it counts as a conflict. He always chooses good (updated) version of data as winner, but it is quite annoying having 15000 conflicts in one table daily. And it makes harder to track other conflicts.
Does it have anything to do with row level column tracking, or it is some known bug? Or, even better, if anyone knows how to avoid it. I was thinking about changing it to column level, but then I need to reinitialize subscriptions which means sending of 9 GB data through some pretty slow lines (256 kbp/s), or few hours work to drop existing subscriptions and create new one's. Maybe I would to this if I knew that column level will help.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Apr 10, 2006
Hi,
l've a raw data which contains list of device name and # of wires used, i.e.
DEVICE NAME # of Wires
--------------------- -------------
A 10
B 11
C 17
D 5
A 0
E 0
So l would like to import these data into my table (with device name as primary key) which each device only appear once. If the device name appear twices, then l should ignore device with # of wires = 0. If device name appear twice and # of wires <> 0, then l should log it.
How should l do that in SSIS ?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 3, 2006
Hi,
I developed an ppc application, where i am using web service for synchronisation, but here i am getting lot of problem while handling conflict management.
Please suggest me how to manage conflicts, using web service.
Thank you,
Prashant
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 31, 2008
Hi,
I have installed SQL Server 2005 Express (I have also kep my SQL Server 2000 installation), created a blank database (using the <default> Collation which I believe is Latin1_General_CI_AS), and restored a backup (from SQL Server 2000) into the newly created database.
All the tables and records appear to be there but I get the following error when trying to make any changes to the database (through my front end application that sits over the database).
Unable to get objects. Additional information: Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Latin1_General_CI_AS" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation..
Looking at the properties of the database, the collation is SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS. I have tried changing this to Latin1_General_CI_AS with no success.
Am I supposed to set the collation when I create the empty database before restoring the backup into it or is there something I am missing?
Thanks, Scott
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 17, 2007
in merge replication using sql server 2005 and sql server compact, what happens when rows or columns cannot be inserted/updated/deleted because of some error other than a conflict? Are they handled differently tan change conflicts?
thanks,
bryan
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 17, 2008
hi;
What is conflict detection in sqldatasource control?
Thanks,mohsen
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 31, 2008
hi allin my local machine there was no problem. however, when i put my database on the the hosting company's database server i got this error System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException:
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between
"SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AI" in the equal
to operationplease help it's urgent thanks
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 17, 2004
Hi;
I am getting this error while I am trying to delete a record from "MediaTypes" table
Media Types table and DVBTestCOutputs table have related through MediaID (cascade on update only not delete)
MediaTypes DVBTestCOutputs
------------- ---------------------
MediaID int ..........................
MType char(10) ..........................
MediaType int
DELETE statement conflicted with COLUMN REFERENCE constraint 'FK_DVBTestCOutputs_MediaTypes1'. The conflict occurred in database 'Test', table 'DVBTestCOutputs', column 'MediaType'.
can you help me please I do not want the related record deleted also from DVBTestCOutputs table so I didn't choose the cascade on delete checkbox is this the problem??
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 21, 2002
Hi,
I ran a sql somedays ago it gave me result, I ran the same sql today it gave different result. The only difference is that the particular table in the sql is frequently used table with lots of new insert. But the sql I ran is not selecting the new rows, it only deals with already inserted records.
Any idea what will make the sql to give different result from same set of records in different time.
Thanks
John Jayaseelan
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 6, 2001
I have some rogue replication conflict tables that I can't delete because they are system tables. They are names aonflict_<tablename> and bonflict_<tablename>. They are definitely not needed anymore. How can I delete them ? Does anyone know how to delete a system table ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 24, 2001
I have a database that has been working in MS Access 97 for a couple of years. I just moved the tables up to our SQL Server (7.0) and now I get "Write Conflict" errors when I try to update certain records. The table has a unique primary key and I have upgraded my MDAC to 2.50. Nothing seems to help.
The records that get the Write Conflict tend to be ones that are the newer ones in the database. Not all records have this problem. I can update the records by going to Enterprise Manager and typing data directly in the tables.
The detail on the error message says "This record has been changed by another user since you started editing it." I am the only one using the database.
Any ideas?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 29, 2003
Hi guys.
I have an Access front end to a MS SQL database. I use ODBC to connect the two and have linked the tables into access correctly.
I am having a problem with Write Conflicts. Access is showing an error box every time I try to change records that have links to them from other tables. I am not trying to change keys or any index fields. If I go to the SQL Enterprise manager I can change the records every time with no problems.
Anyone out there got any idea as to what is happening? I have been trying to solve this for over a month now and am completely stuck.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 22, 2006
UPDATE #TMPC
SET EsaItem = ItemClass
FROM #TMPC A,
dbo.EisAdj_ItemClass_V B
WHERE A.EsaItem = B.ItemClassCODE
This code is part of my procedure. I always get error--Server: Msg 446, Level 16, State 9, Procedure GetAdjDataFromShipment, Line 282
Cannot resolve collation conflict for equal to operation.
when program execute at this section.
I try to add this statement "COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS", but it seems not working. I do not know why!
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 21, 2006
Hi there,
I am trying to update one table on server A/database A with new records from a server B/database B.
Both databases use the same collation. The key-fields of both table do use the same collation, but not the server.
Help: I was thinking, when both databases and the fields inside the tables do both use the same collation, then there will not upcome any conflict ?
Do I have to adapt the database collation, too ? This would'nt be nice as I am retreiving data from different servers with different server collations...
Anybody else got the same problem ?
Thx in advance
dajm
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 9, 2006
Okely dokely, here it is.I have a database that has a differing collation to that of the tempdb. And obviously because of this I've run into problems when referencing table variables and temp tables. BUT! Given the following example, what am I doing wrong, or is there no solution to this. <Start Example>/*================================================= ================================================== ==========================fnPM_ForeignKey ================================================== ================================================== =========================*/IF exists (select * from dbo.sysobjects where id = object_id(N'[dbo].[fnPM_ForeignKey]')) BEGINDROP FUNCTION [dbo].[fnPM_ForeignKey]ENDGOCREATE FUNCTION fnPM_ForeignKey (@ChildTable as sysname, @ChildColumn as sysname)RETURNS @ForeignKey TABLE (FKName sysname,ParentTable sysname,ParentColumn sysname,DescriptionColumn sysname COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS)ASBEGININSERT INTO @ForeignKey (FKName, ParentTable, ParentColumn)SELECT FK.Name, Parent.Name, ParentCol.NameFROM sysforeignkeysINNER JOIN sysobjects FK on sysforeignkeys.constid = FK.IDINNER JOIN sysobjects Parent on sysforeignkeys.rkeyid = Parent.idINNER JOIN syscolumns ParentCol on ParentCol.id = Parent.id and sysforeignkeys.rkey = ParentCol.colidINNER JOIN sysobjects Child on sysforeignkeys.fkeyid = Child.idINNER JOIN syscolumns ChildCol on ChildCol.id = Child.id and sysforeignkeys.fkey = ChildCol.colid WHERE Child.Name = @ChildTable and ChildCol.Name = @ChildColumn--> UPDATE @ForeignKey Set DescriptionColumn = syscolumns.Name COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_ASFROM @ForeignKey ForeignKeyINNER JOIN sysobjects on ForeignKey.ParentTable = sysobjects.NameINNER JOIN syscolumns on syscolumns.id = sysobjects.idWHERE syscolumns.Name like '%Name%'UPDATE @ForeignKey Set DescriptionColumn = syscolumns.NameFROM @ForeignKey ForeignKeyINNER JOIN sysobjects on ForeignKey.ParentTable = sysobjects.NameINNER JOIN syscolumns on syscolumns.id = sysobjects.idWHERE ForeignKey.DescriptionColumn is null and syscolumns.Name like '%Description%'RETURN ENDGO< end example >So here I'm defining my function which basically returns the parent table details of a given foreign key relationship. But when trying to run the above script I get this,Server: Msg 446, Level 16, State 9, Procedure fnPM_ForeignKey, Line 22Cannot resolve collation conflict for equal to operation.First up I find this weird because isn't sysname equvalent to nvarchar(128)? And aren't nvarchar fields independant of collation? But it gets better,I thought, ok maybe I'm wrong about sysname needing collation, so I figured I'll check the collation of the syscolumns.name column,Heres the queryselect sysobjects.Name, syscolumns.name, syscolumns.collationfrom sysobjects inner join syscolumns on sysobjects.id = syscolumns.idwhere sysobjects.name ='syscolumns' and syscolumns.name = 'name'This is what it returns,syscolumnsnameSQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_ASSo, let me get this straight, I've explicitly stated that the table variable column is collation SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_ASand the column I'm comparing it to also has a collation of SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS, and it doesn't work. . . .I smell Microsoft, or is there something equally as hideous going on here.RegardsAdam.
View 1 Replies
View Related
