Hello,
Can anyone please tell me the best way to upgrade server1 with SERVER7 and OS of NT to a new server2 with SERVER2000 AND WINDOWS 2000 ?
The data in the old server is very important.
Thanks
Hello,
I have to do an upgrade from server 7 and OS NT to server2000 and windows 2000. Has anyone had any problems while doing this ? Please list the steps taken for the upgrade if you can.
Thanks
Can I install DB@ on windows2000?
View 1 Replies View RelatedDoes SQL Server 7.0 works with Windows2000 Pro?
We installed SQL 7.0 on Windows 2000 Professional and
cannot seems to find the server components of it.
Was wondering if anybody successfully installed SQL7.0
on Windows2000 Pro?
Pl. send an email.
TIA
DIN
dk@i1.net
hi,
i'm new to this sql server thing. i hope somebody can help me out!
i would like to find a way to determine whether or not the automated
backup of the database has been done without using the sql mail
functionality. i'm not allowed to use that because it only runs for
the microsoft outlook and it cost too much space. the server is in one
of our clients and they do not have a db admin, and nobody wants to go
there can i do something????
Does anyone know the advantages of using a view over a store procedure? Are there any proformance differences?
thanks
steve
I just brought SQL Server 7.0. Previously i am using Access97 . I am building some Asp stuffs using Access
Database. NOw i move the database Access to Sql server. I am planning to install this sql in separate machine
in the network.
After the installation, i need to use the database for my Asp programs..
I would like to know what are the things that i should keep(follow) while installing SQL Server 7.0.
Also i need to know some Admin procedure..Where i can found..?
Help will be appreciated.
Thanks
rams
I'm worhing with SQL Server7.0 and I have created a database.
I have objets and data in my database
My database have 300Mb and I only need about 50.
How can I reduce to 50 the dimension of my database.
Is it posible??
Any advice will be greatly apreciatted.
Nauj
Can SQL server7 restore a single table? If one table corrupted, do I have to restore the whole database for this table ?( It is awkward to restore the whole database only for a single table! especially the database is large!)
thanks,
I have a full backup done on a very important server 7 database. Now i have to test to see if it is saving okay and to do a mock restore to see how quickly we can restore same. The size of the file is about 700M. I would have to do my testing on a test server. How do I go about this.
Thanks.
HelloDoes anyone one know the max size of a database that I can create onMS-SQL server 7. Have had any problems using databases near the maxsize (slow performance, etc)ThanksHelena
View 2 Replies View RelatedHi
we are having SQL server7.0 with DPT raid card which gives the problem of backup/restore through normal SQL backup in Enterprise manager.So we are not using the above procedure
but we have moved all the tables using SQL EXPORT to another new server.
Can you please give a solution to transfer Stored procedure from the server to new server
Regards
Rajakumar
Hi,
The company finally bought a legitimate copy of SQL Server 7. There was nothing special on my trial version, so I chose the uninstall option from the start menu (it was on my Win95 PC). It removed the files, but didn't uninstall the registry bits though! When trying to install the proper version of SQL 7 it has detected the other version, but no files & won't let me install the legitimate version. Can anyone tell me how to get around this to install the new version?
Thanks
Steve
I posted this problem last week and still couldn't get this to work.
I have a backed up copy of a production db that i want to test. The production server is using server 7 white i have 2000 at my desktop. How can i get this to work ? I am beginning to 'lose' it.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. I would like to complete this test today.
Thanks
Hello,
When I try to create a primary key for a table(alter table tablename add primary key( columnname)), I get a message
" SQL 1918. ( Index (key=2) is being rebuilt)."
Does any one have a clue, as to why do I get this. The primary key does get created ,but my application stops working, after getting this message.
Thanks,
Mitesh
When I try to install MS SQl server2000 on windows XP machine,it says the server component is not supported by OS.What should I do to get it run on my machine?
View 3 Replies View RelatedHi,
I'm Arash Baseri a Sql Server2000 developer and mail you from Dubai (U.A.E). I have a problem in Sql Server locking table. My problem is not reasonable so the more I researched the more I understand it is not my problem .it is a bug in Sql Server2000.
Now I explain the situation:
I have two tables (Table A and Table B).Table A has a clustered index on col1 and col2, Table B has a clustered index on col1 and col2. I join these tables and update col3 in table A, like this
begin tran
insert [Table A]
select * from Arshiv_Master where Col1 between 26001 AND 26001
Update AI31 set Col3=Case
when 1=1 then 1
Else 0 End
From [Table A]AI5, [Table B]AI31
where AI5.Col1=AI31.Col1 And AI31.Col1 Between 26001 And 26001
/* intentionally I didn't rollback or commit transaction to hold locks on table*/
In another connection I execute this query and I face "Lock request timeout period exceeded" error message.
set lock_timeout 1
set transaction isolation level read uncommitted
Update AI31 set Col3=Case
when 1=1 then 0
Else 0 End
From [Table A] AI5, [Table B] AI31 where AI5.Col1=AI31.Col1 and AI31.Col1 between 45018 And 60000
Now the most interesting part is here .when I use a smaller data range for Col1 no error message is shown. A query like this
set lock_timeout 1
set transaction isolation level read uncommitted
Update AI31 set Col3=Case
when 1=1 then 0
Else 0 End
From [Table A] AI5, [Table B] AI31 where AI5.Col1=AI31.Col1 and AI31.Col1 between 45018 And 50000
As you see the difference between the last two queries is on WHERE clause especially on data rages of Col1.
As you know Sql Server 2000 has row level lock and when I acquire a lock on a record the other records are free. So what's wrong with Sql Server that assumes the others records are locked. I tested this situation in Sql Server 2005 and this problem was not seen so I think it's a bug in Sql Server 2000.Who can help me about this problem?
Hi,
I'm Arash Baseri a Sql Server2000 developer and mail you from Dubai (U.A.E). I have a problem in Sql Server locking table. My problem is not reasonable so the more I researched the more I understand it is not my problem .it is a bug in Sql Server2000.
Now I explain the situation:
I have two tables (Table A and Table B).Table A has a clustered index on col1 and col2, Table B has a clustered index on col1 and col2. I join these tables and update col3 in table A, like this
begin tran
insert [Table A]
select * from Arshiv_Master where Col1 between 26001 AND 26001
Update AI31 set Col3=Case
when 1=1 then 1
Else 0 End
From [Table A]AI5, [Table B]AI31
where AI5.Col1=AI31.Col1 And AI31.Col1 Between 26001 And 26001
/* intentionally I didn't rollback or commit transaction to hold locks on table*/
In another connection I execute this query and I face "Lock request timeout period exceeded" error message.
set lock_timeout 1
set transaction isolation level read uncommitted
Update AI31 set Col3=Case
when 1=1 then 0
Else 0 End
From [Table A] AI5, [Table B] AI31 where AI5.Col1=AI31.Col1 and AI31.Col1 between 45018 And 60000
Now the most interesting part is here .when I use a smaller data range for Col1 no error message is shown. A query like this
set lock_timeout 1
set transaction isolation level read uncommitted
Update AI31 set Col3=Case
when 1=1 then 0
Else 0 End
From [Table A] AI5, [Table B] AI31 where AI5.Col1=AI31.Col1 and AI31.Col1 between 45018 And 50000
As you see the difference between the last two queries is on WHERE clause especially on data rages of Col1.
As you know Sql Server 2000 has row level lock and when I acquire a lock on a record the other records are free. So what's wrong with Sql Server that assumes the others records are locked. I tested this situation in Sql Server 2005 and this problem was not seen so I think it's a bug in Sql Server 2000.Who can help me about this problem?
HI,
I have a application which has Access as Front end and SQLServer as BackEnd.
I have a table which has student details.
Table Fields are:
Record#,FirstName,LastName,MiddleName,Address,City ,State,Pin,.....
The table has about 1200 records.
Every Thing works fine but in the front end when i try to do a search by
FirstName it is VERY SLOW.But it is okey if i search by the Record#.
I need to search by lastname or Firstname and speed up the process.
Any Help will be appreciated,
Thanks,
Rang.
What are the experiences of those who have upgraded to
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhat are the experiences of those who have upgraded to SQL Server 2000?
I am writing a paper for my company and wish to list features of SQL Server 2000 from a user/developer/business aspect. We are on
SQL Server 6.5 and I need to highlight the advantages and disadvatages of upgrading.
Thanks
Jeff
Hi everybody,
I configured Logshipping in sql server 2000(Enterprise edition).in destination server copy and restore is failing(but there is no error).Out ofsync threshold value is set 27 minutes, after 27 minutes i found the error message in sql server error logs "The log shipping destination HARSHA.Northwind1 is out of sync by 27 minutes..
Any body help me
Hi gang,
Just trying to get some information on what is required to migrate from Access 2000 to SQL Server?? Is it pretty difficult to do? Are there any changes to the data or structure that is needed? Is SQL Server more secure? What about MSDE instead of SQL?? I'm just needing some tips and info on what to expect and all as I think we are going there kinda soon. I can do many things in Access but not sure how to go about them in SQL Server? Can you also do reports from there as well?
Inquiring mind wants to know
have a nice one,
Bud
There is a Server with 4G Memory. I installed a SQL Server 2000 standardversion on it.I heard that SQLServer2000 could use only up to 2GB memory. Is it true?How can I use those 4GB memory? I can not upgrade to SQL Server 2005 orother version because i don't want to take this risk.Thank you very much.
View 8 Replies View RelatedHi, Is it possible to use ssis for the etl processes and still have an existing 2000 db? For e.g. CanI create a ssis pkg and use the xml task to download data to a 2000 db.
View 4 Replies View RelatedHI,Thank you to pay attention to this thread.i am chinese,may be i coudln't say my problem clearly,it's.....
okay,i use the TextBox,SQL Server 2000,i fill the TextBox as Chinese,then,I use the T-Sql INSERT to Finish Inserting A record,but when i open the SQL Server 2000,i find that the char showed in field as the char '???',i don't understand what happened,if the fault of UnicodeEncoding?can you help me? Thx~!
dear sir/madam,
i have to create a cube in analysis manager in sql server 2000.as i want to see the data according to my organisation levels.
organisation level:
1.Business unit
2.Team manager
3.Sales manager.
and also i create the three user respectively and assign all user has adminstrator category in user accounts of windows XP.
after create the user and design the manage role to restrict the levels which i have create the dimension.after login which i have to create the user i can see all levels of data.
so pls solution for see data which i have to restrict the dimenssion only..
thanks
kesavan
HI
I have a big problem with SQL server2000. I can't get COLUMN DESCRIPTION.
I will print DATADICTIONARY from a DB, I can get all elemnts (table name, columns name, datatype, precision, scale, FK, PK, default value..) I missed only DESCRIPTION. How I can get it????
Medo
Please Help me on this.
I installed the two instances SQL on one box. ONe is default instance called ACSQL1(actually machine name) and the other one is called ACSQL1/DEVELOPMENT. THrought the my client site of SQL 2000 I can access both instances. When I try to get connection from VB. I can access the default instance but I can not access the second instance. Any ideas about this???
Qun Lu
Hi,
I am new in SQL SERVER.I wanted to setup high availability database.It would be great if any one could answers my questions please.
-What are the options availability for HA except clustering?
-How to set up log shipping HA ?
-How to monitor log shipping?
-Is standby DB and log shipping same ?
-Can I setup log shipping without backup/restore method.Like I have to create db1 on server A and create db1 on server B and then configure log shipping?
-Is it necessary to ship log for master database or only user Database?
Thx
-Blace
I want make setup cd for my program and i use visualbasic 6 and SQL Server 2000 .
What i should make and include my setup file to make it work with any one install it in his computer and we assume he dont have SQL Server2000 in his computer .
Please help me on that
Should SQL Server 2000 must alreeady installed on his computer?
If its must be installed,Is there any way to make it easy through my setup file to make it install sql server automatic ?
Can i make my program in visual basic create database and tables and relations and so.
Please help me on that becuase its too Important.
Thanks.
Hi,
I want to install the sql server2000 analysis service.Can you please tell me the website from which I can install that.
Hi,
I'm wondering if anybody can help me. I have to restore the database from the backup sent by vendor. Backup itself (backup_0906 file) is 60 MB. Below is a statement I run:
RESTORE DATABASE PDMUpload
FROM
DISK = 'e:ftpdirackup_0906'
WITH FILE = 1, NOUNLOAD , STATS = 10, RECOVERY ,
REPLACE ,
MOVE N'PDMUpload_Data' TO N'E:MSSQLDataPDMUpload_Data.MDF',
MOVE N'PDMUpload_Log' TO N'E:MSSQLDataPDMUpload_Log.LDF'
I get the following error messages:
Server: Msg 3257, Level 16, State 1, Procedure RestoreUpload, Line 9
There is insufficient free space on disk volume 'E:' to create the database. The database requires 28181331968 additional free bytes, while only 6759866368 bytes are available.
RESTORE DATABASE is terminating abnormally.
If anybody can explain why DB needs 28 GB???? BTW, there is 6 GB of diskspace available on E: drive.
I appreciate any help.