How can i enable my fulltex change-tracking and update-index in my table?
I recreated my fulltext catalog and start the full population, but although my fulltext index status shows active, my full-text change-tracking and the update index were disabled. - and I don't know how to enable them.
Thanks in advance
We are going to use SQL Sever change tracking. The problem is that some of our tables, which are to be tracked, have no primary keys. There are only unique clustered indexes. The question is what is the best way to turn on change tracking for these tables in our circumstances.
View 4 Replies View RelatedTrying to determine what the minimum permissions i can grant to a user so they can see the change tracking data
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi All,
I am using SQL SERVER 2005 Express. I am trying to set up CREATE FULLTEXT INDEX.
I have confirmed that the Fulltext is installed with:
SELECT
fulltextserviceproperty('IsFulltextInstalled')
So no I need to create a Full Text index:
CREATE FULLTEXT INDEX
ON E190MELCDL(xmldata)
KEY INDEX PK_E190MELCDL
But I get this error:
Informational: No full-text supported languages found.
Informational: No full-text supported languages found.
Msg 7680, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Default full-text index language is not a language supported by full-text search.
Any Ideas?
Thanks,
Bones
I've got fresh Installed SQLExpress 2005 Adv. with a following:
WinXP Pro, Developer PC, Admin/Full rights, Antivirus PC-Cilin was switched off for the installation.Enable User Instance - 0 (clear check box during installation)SQL Collation: Dictionary order case sensetive for1252 Char setSELECT @@language: us_englishcreate fulltext catalog testAPFullTextcatalog,
Sp_help_FullText_catalogs: 5 testAPFullTextcatalog C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQL.1MSSQLFTData estAPFullTextcatalog 0 0create unique index indexName_Comment on dbo.FullTextSearchTestTable(RecordID)
sp_configure:
allow updates 0 1 0 0
clr enabled 0 1 0 0
cross db ownership chaining 0 1 0 0
default language 0 9999 0 0
max text repl size (B) 0 2147483647 65536 65536
nested triggers 0 1 1 1
remote access 0 1 1 1
remote admin connections 0 1 0 0
remote login timeout (s) 0 2147483647 20 20
remote proc trans 0 1 0 0
remote query timeout (s) 0 2147483647 600 600
server trigger recursion 0 1 1 1
show advanced options 0 1 0 0
user instances enabled 0 1 0 0
user options 0 32767 0 0CREATE FULLTEXT INDEX ON dbo.FullTextSearchTestTable(Comment)
KEY INDEX indexName_Comment ON testAPFullTextcatalog
WITH CHANGE_TRACKING AUTO
Result:
Informational: No full-text supported languages found.
Informational: No full-text supported languages found.
Msg 7680, Level 16, State 1, Line 1Default full-text index language is not a language supported by full-text search.
I couldn't overcome the issue. Please help.
Alexei
P.S. May be Important: During installation (on Management Studio Express installation stage) a had to click twice the "Ignore" button for the following popUp message:
"Could not write value to key:
SoftwareClasses.xdropenWithProgIdsShared - verify, if you have sufficient access to hot key or contact your support.
I'm about ready to smash my computer. I've installed SQL Server 2005 Express Edition with Advanced Services on Win XP Pro SP2. I made sure to enable the Fulltext service at install. Installed to the default instance name, and made sure the fulltext service is running from the CM. I made sure to enable full text indexing on my database from the properties window. I can create the fulltext catalog, but not the index!
----
create fulltext index on [person.contact] (Lastname)
key index [PK_Person.Contact] on myfulltextcatalog
Informational: No full-text supported languages found.
Informational: No full-text supported languages found.
Msg 7680, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Default full-text index language is not a language supported by full-text search.
----------------------------------------------
select * from sys.fulltext_catalogs
returns the catalog
----------------------------------------------
sp_fulltext_service 'update_languages'
Informational: No full-text supported languages found.
----------------------------------------------
select @@language
us_english
----------------------------------------------
select * from sys.fulltext_languages
Returns an empty table
----------------------------------------------
SELECT * FROM sys.configurations
ORDER BY name ;
1126 default full-text language 1033 0 2147483647 1033 default full-text language 1 1
----------------------------------------------
Does anyone have any idea what's going on? I've already removed and re-installed a couple of times to different directories, used different instance names, and still no luck. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Mike
Hello all,I'm wanting to do a CONTAINS query on fields that belong to two seperate tables. So, for example, this is what I'd *like* to do :SELECT ci.itemNameFROM Content_Items ciINNER JOIN Content_Pages AS cp ON ci.contentItemId = cp.contentItemIdINNER JOIN FREETEXTTABLE(Content_Items, (ci.title, cp.pageText), @searchString) AS ft ON ci.contentItemId = ft.[KEY]However, this will not work, since SQL Server won't let you do fulltext queries against more then one table.So my idea is to create a view that combines my Content_Items table with the desired column from my Content_Pages table. I would then create a fulltext index on this view, and do fulltext queries against it.It seems like this should work. However, when I try to create a fulltext index on my newly-created view, I get this error :A unique column must be defined on this table/view.How do I create a unique column within a view?Also, will my approach work, or will it have unintended consequences? I'm using this as part of a search component in my software, so it has to perform reasonably well.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHello,
i have a database with about 300.000 entries. The database gets about 30 new entries every day. The Database has an FulltextIndex on several columns. This FulltextIndex will be updated every night.
But now i have found out, that the fulltextsearch doesn't work anymore for all entries that where added after April 2006.
When i for example make following sql-statementSELECT id,date FROM MyTable WHERE (CONTAINS((columnA),' "mykeyword" '))
i only get results that have a date after April 2006 (although there are matching entries after that date).
What can the reason for that be?
According to Management Studio the last Update of the FulltextCatalog has been made on 1st of December 2007. Everything looks normal and I didn't find any logs that are saying that there has been any errors.
Where do I have to look to be sure if the FullTextIndex does work?
Specs:
SQL Server 2005
Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio 9.00.1399.00Microsoft Analysis Services-Clienttools 2005.090.1399.00Microsoft Data Access Components (MDAC) 2000.086.3959.00 (srv03_sp2_rtm.070216-1710)Microsoft MSXML 2.6 3.0 6.0 Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0.3790.3959Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0.50727.832Operating System 5.2.3790
greetings
Klaus
SQL Server 2005:
Anyone know how best to rewrite this SQL string to perform a weighted search on my table?
here's my code:
SQL="SELECT RecipeName FROM recipeList WHERE FREETEXT(*,'ISABOUT " & ing01 & " WEIGHT (.1) or " & ing02 & " WEIGHT (.2) or " & ing03 & " WEIGHT (.3) or " & ing04 & " WEIGHT (.4) or " & ing05 & " WEIGHT (.5)')"
the idea is to get a list of recipes most pertinant to the ingredients entered.
table 'recipeList' contains the ingredients in several columns. so column 2 might say '5oz of flour', column 2 - '2oz butter' etc.
at the moment it returns the correct recipes but not in the right order.
If I use 'CONTAINS' it returns nothing.
hope that's not too vague!
Hello all,
I'm wanting to do a CONTAINS query on fields that belong to two seperate tables. So, for example, this is what I'd *like* to do :
SELECT ci.itemName
FROM Content_Items ci
INNER JOIN Content_Pages AS cp ON ci.contentItemId = cp.contentItemId
INNER JOIN FREETEXTTABLE(Content_Items, (ci.title, cp.pageText), @searchString) AS ft ON ci.contentItemId = ft.[KEY]
However, this will not work, since SQL Server won't let you do fulltext queries against more then one table.
So my idea is to create a view that combines my Content_Items table with the desired column from my Content_Pages table. I would then create a fulltext index on this view, and do fulltext queries against it.
It seems like this should work. However, when I try to create a fulltext index on my newly-created view, I get this error :
A unique column must be defined on this table/view.
How do I create a unique column within a view?
Also, will my approach work, or will it have unintended consequences? I'm using this as part of a search component in my software, so it has to perform reasonably well.
I just tried to backup a database I recently deployed to to SQL Server 2005 box, and got the following error:
The backup of full-text catalog 'myCatalog' is not permitted because it is not online. Check errorlog file for the reason that full-text catalog became offline and bring it online.
Or BACKUP can be performed by using the FILEGROUP or FILE clauses to restrict the selection to include only online data.
I don't need the index so I tried to drop it with both:
DROP fulltext catalog 'myCatalog'
and
DROP catalog 'myCatalog'
but both give me a syntax error.
How can I get rid of this index so I can backup my database?
Thanks,
Tristan
We are designing a scenario in which we will have a central publisher and several subscribers in a server to server environment using Merge replication. We also will have a fulltext index for one of the tables being replicated and synchronized. What are your recommendations for the index? Would auto change tracking reduce the impact? We are building for a possible 1 billion row table but do not anticipate more than 100K rows at any time of replication.
Thanks,
Sally
Hello all,
I'm wanting to do a CONTAINS query on fields that belong to two seperate tables. So, for example, this is what I'd *like* to do :
SELECT ci.itemName
FROM Content_Items ci
INNER JOIN Content_Pages AS cp ON ci.contentItemId = cp.contentItemId
INNER JOIN FREETEXTTABLE(Content_Items, (ci.title, cp.pageText), @searchString) AS ft ON ci.contentItemId = ft.[KEY]
However, this will not work, since SQL Server won't let you do fulltext queries against more then one table.
So my idea is to create a view that combines my Content_Items table with the desired column from my Content_Pages table. I would then create a fulltext index on this view, and do fulltext queries against it.
It seems like this should work. However, when I try to create a fulltext index on my newly-created view, I get this error :
A unique column must be defined on this table/view.
How do I create a unique column within a view?
Also, will my approach work, or will it have unintended consequences? I'm using this as part of a search component in my software, so it has to perform reasonably well.
Our production DBs are SQL Server 2000(Enterprise Edition) on Windows2003.
Can anybody tell me how can I check whether a table has a FullText Index or not?
Thank you!
I am running a DB with 250Gb of documents, the fulltext index just keeps growing and growing. The files in the MssearchCatalogDir folder is currently taking up 106Gb, it was only 74Gb this morning. The full text catalog size property says its only 53.6Gb and this is remaining steady while the files in the MssearchCatalogDir folder seem to be balloning out of control. I ran a reorg on the fulltext catalog and it did not alter the file space (actually increased it).
There is one *.ci file that is doing most of the growing, its about three times as big as the second biggest one and is expanding before my eyes.
Should I have turned population off when I did the reorg?
Manamgement studio has an Optimize catalog option on the fulltext catalog properties dialog, is this different from a fulltext catalog reorg? Should I run this.
Should I run a shrink file on the filegroup containing the fulltext catalog (the filegroup itself is very small, all the space is in the MssearchCatalogDir folder)?
I have 140Gb left on this drive, is it just going to keep on expanding until I'm out of room, I just dont know what I should do.
Abit more info.....
I was rebuilding the index from scratch (needed to move it to another filegroup).
When I first started the rebuild, msftesql.exe and msftefd.exe were both taking alot of cpu and the overall cpu usage was high. Now after 12 hours, only msftesql.exe is running and is taking up 5-10% cpu. Could it be that the rebuild is not complete yet? Although the Item Count property of the full text catalog does seem to indicate that all documents have been processed, the processes keeps running and disk space keeps going down.
Hi,
I have a problem restoring a Read-Only filegroup in a database.
I've restored the Read/Write filegroups first without any problem.
Then, I am able to recover Read-Only filegroups which do not contain fulltext indexes with the command :
RESTORE DATABASE GSM FILEGROUP = 'FG_RO_20080214' WITH RECOVERY
However, for filegroups containing FullText indexes (Fulltext indexes are in the same filegroup as data used for this index), I always get the following error :
Server: Msg 3149, Level 16, State 6, Line 1
The file or filegroup "sysft_CAT_SM_20080127" is not in a valid state for the "Recover Data Only" option to be used. Only secondary files in the OFFLINE or RECOVERY_PENDING state can be processed.
Server: Msg 3013, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
RESTORE DATABASE is terminating abnormally.
If I'm looking at sys.database_files catalog view, I can see the following
name type_desc state_desc
------------------------ ----------- -----------------
sysft_CAT_MS_20080127 FULLTEXT RECOVERY_PENDING
Does anyone have an idea, please.
Thanks in advance
Patrick
For demonstration I created a fulltext index on table employee in Northwind database.
The following query gives an error:
SELECT * FROM employees
WHERE CONTAINS (FirstName, 'Barbe')
Replacing 'Barbe' by 'Barb' or other words it works fine.
The error message is (I have a french version of SQL installed, here the translation: "A clause in the query contains only ignored words"
Une clause de la requête ne contient que des mots ignorés)
Language for wordbreak in fulltext index is French and the error happens only with French, with English it works.
Is this a Microsoft bug?
I am using SSIS to replace set of tables daily. One of the table has primary, unique, foreign keys and full-text index. Before truncating, I am dropping the foreign key constraints (to truncate the parent table), truncating the tables and recreating the foreign keys.
I have few questions:
1) Do I need to drop and recreate the unique key as well? (I am not dropping the primary key) - Unique key is identity column created just for the full-text indexing since it was mentioned that key on integer is better than key on varchar and my pk is a varchar.
2) Do I need to drop and recreate the full-text index or just rebuild/repopulate it every time the table is loaded.
This is the first time i am using  full text index and I was able to learn a lot about it from the sites. I would like to understand the correct approach while loading the tables.
Has anyone come across a change tracking tool for SQL Server. Specificallythe scenario I want is the following :A Production DB needs some modifications to its content.This tool will copy the DB to a dev environment.The Dev environment will be 2 copies of the DB, 1 as a control set and theother the change DB.The developer makes their changes in the Change DB. They test them out andthen when they decide the changes are ready to pushto production they hitthe "go" button on the tool.The tool calculates the delta between the Control and the Change DB and thenpushes the changes to producitonAny ideasThankss
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have a table that is Full Text Search index enabled on one column.This table has 200 lakhs of rows(20000000) . ContainsTable() function is searching data with in these 200 lakhs of rows(20000000), if any new rows are inserted then the ContainsTable is not going to search in these recent inserted rows.
We observed when we try for a data to search. it is returning the rows till the rows that are inserted date is less than 30th of march 2012. but not searching in the records that are created after April month , if even the data we are searching is available .
TableFulltextItemCount is around 2.2 crores.
Then we done rebuilt the FT catalog Index. then the TableFulltextItemCount became 0.Again we run the containstable query ,but still it is not getting results.
As the no of rows are very more . so i am not able to show the actual rows from which the data is not coming.
the below query gives 2 results that are from actual base table
HTML Code:
select * from g_case_action_log where cas_details like '%235355%' and product_id = 38810
To search for the same above word using FTS,I have used the query as below
HTML Code:
SELECT Distinct top 50 cal.case_id,cal.cas_details From g_case_action_log cal (READUNCOMMITTED)inner join containstable(es.g_case_action_log, cas_details, ' ("235355" OR "<br>235355" OR "235355<br> ") ') as key_tbl on cal.log_id = key_tbl.[key] Where cal.product_id = 38810 ORDER By cal.case_id DESC
I have attached one sql script file for your ref that contains create logic and index schema properties
Why it is not returning results all the time.
This one is giving me quite a bit more difficulty then I ever imagined it would...
Essentially I would like to use one table to store the change history for multiple tables. I would like to use an update trigger to check which fields have changed in each record, and write a single record for each field that changed containing the table name, field name, previous value and new value to a history table.
I can't seem to find a good way to do this.
How to reset the value of the change tracking anchor id?
CHANGE_TRACKING_CURRENT_VERSION()
It's a bigint that increments on every DML operation and I just wondered how you could reset it back to zero. Turning change tracking off and on doesn't seem to do it.
Is there a table where last DDL change date exists? For instance, if I have added a column to a table is there anywhere I can find when this occurred? Auditors are askng about this.
View 7 Replies View RelatedDoes anyone know of software that tracks changes to a database? Forexample, it would track anytime an SP or view was recompiled, or ifyou added or deleted a column to a database?
View 1 Replies View RelatedHello..
When I used Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Management Studio Express to Create FULL TEXT INDEX by this code:
CREATE FULLTEXT INDEX ON txtfilestbl(txtfile) KEY INDEX PK_txtfilestbl ON ForumsArchiveLibCtlg WITH CHANGE_TRACKING AUTO
It returns this ERR MSG:
Informational: No full-text supported languages found.
Informational: No full-text supported languages found.
Msg 7680, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Default full-text index language is not a language supported by full-text search.
I Use same this code to create FULL TEXT INDEX by using Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Management Studio, and it was working properly.
What I have to do?
I have an exact copy of a database on 2 instances of SQL server (dev and test - dev is restored from test).There's a view that I select top 1000 rows from that runs extremely slow on both instances (DEV and TEST) however on DEV the execution plan specifies that I'm missing an index however in TESTÂ the execution plan does not specify that I'm missing an index.
View 3 Replies View Relatedbest way to track changes for a very pesky table.We pull down a table from an Oracle database (via linked server) into our SQL Server on a daily basis. The data in this table is just truncated and reloaded daily. There is no "history" kept in the oracle database and values are not being "updated" its just dropped and repopulated.
So, I have toyed around with CDC and even creating my own custom auditing method but I can't come up with a reasonable solution that doesn't involve a massive audit table that doesn't provide much useful info.
For example, there are two date fields in the table that my customer wishes to have history tracked for. Every day, this table is truncated and reloaded - however those dates may stay the same for many many many months. If I turn on CDC, I will get tons of audit records for a delete and an insert every day but the values for the two date fields may not have even changed.
The table has tons of fields in it but I only care about the 2 date fields for history purposes.Here is a snippet of the table (I took out all the additional fields in the table and just left the two date fields that need to be tracked):
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Fake_Name](
[lin] [char](6) NOT NULL,
[boip_no] [char](6) NOT NULL,
[dt_tc] [varchar](25) NULL,
[Code] .....
method to track changes to this table with it being truncated every day?
We are developing an application that requires change tracking.We tested it in development and test environments and we are preparing our production deployment.The very first thing that needs to be done is an
ALTER
DATABASE [db_name] SET
CHANGE_TRACKING =
ON (CHANGE_RETENTION
= 2 DAYS,
AUTO_CLEANUP =
ON)
We are holding on this first step because this statement alone executed for a good 4min on the development server. The production environment is many times larger and busier, and we can’t afford service disruption, so we are at the point where we need to understand what’s involved in running this ALTER DATABASE statement.Is there any documentation on what is happening behind the scene when this statement executes such that we can assess the risks of running it in production?
In a change tracking enabled database I can find the latest change tracking version number by using
Select CHANGE_TRACKING_CURRENT_VERSION() As Latest ChangeTrackingID.
Which will give latest change tracking id (example 1022), Is there a way to find the datetime of this latest change tracking id.
Hi, I just want you to know that I am very young in ASP.NET world so please bear with me.I have been looking for an answer to my problem, but unfortunately I couldn’t find one. So I created a user here on www.asp.net just for making this post.
Before I continue I just want to apologies if there is another post where this question is already answered.
Please watch this Print Screen I just took: � http://www.bewarmaronsi.com/Capture.JPG “
As you can see the “INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE Statements� are disabled, and that’s exactly my problem. I tried with an MS access database and it works perfect, but when I use a MS SQL database this field gets disabled for some reason.
The MDF file is located in the App_data folder and is called ASPNETDB.
And when I try to add custom SQL statements, it gives me Syntax error near “=�. Something like that. I bought the Total Training Set1 package and it works perfect in their examples.
I just want to thank you for reading my post and I hope that you got some useful information for me.
By the way, I’, from Sweden so you have to excuse me if my English is rusty.
Thanks!
PS: Can it be that I’m running windows Vista?
Found out a while back that my facts-tabel has an non-clustered index on its facts_id. In a bunch of procedures an update is executed against a facts_id unfortunately on it's facts-table. I was wondering if changing it into a clustered index is worth the effort / would make sense considering a +110 million facts and re-indexing the other indexes as well? Facts are loaded sequentially, so I would suspect them facts are in the ordered already?
thanx,
Is there any way to change the value of a primary key value?
View 10 Replies View RelatedI have been testing methods to maintain indexes in a SQL Server 2005 database which has been migrated from SQL Server 2000. The compatibility level is still set to 80. I used the query below to inspect the degree of fragmentation amongst other things.
SELECT a.index_id
, name
, database_id
, avg_fragmentation_in_percent
,index_type_desc
,fragment_count
,page_count
FROM sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats (NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, 'DETAILED') AS a
JOIN sys.indexes AS b ON a.object_id = b.object_id AND a.index_id = b.index_id
Some of the indexes in the database had a high degree of fragmentation based on the avg_fragmentation_in_percent value. I tried drop+create, rebuild and reorganise commands on those indexes. Predictably, drop + create was the most effective, but even that did not always reduce fragmentation much. Sometimes the fragmentation was the same no matter what method I used. Other times drop+create helped, rebuild made it worse.
What is going on?