Hi, can anyone shed some light on this issue?
SELECT Status from lupStatus
with a normal query it returns the correct recordcount
SELECT Status from lupStatus GROUP BY Status
but with a GROUP By clause or DISTINCT clause it return the recordcount
= -1
Hi,
What is HAVING clause equivalent in the following oracle query, without the combination of "GROUP BY" clause ?
eg :
SELECT SUM(col1) from test HAVING col2 < 5
SELECT SUM(col1) from test WHERE x=y AND HAVING col2 < 5
I want the equivalent query in MSSQLServer for the above Oracle query.
Also, does the aggregate function in Select column(here the SUM(col1)) affect in anyway the presence of HAVING clause?.
Thanks,
Gopi.
How Can I use Top Clause with GROUP BY clause?
Here is my simple problem.
I have two tables
Categories
Products
I want to know Top 5 Products in CategoryID 1,2,3,4,5
Resultset should contain 25 Rows ( 5 top products from each category )
I hope someone will help me soon.
Its urngent
thanks in advance
regards
Waqas
I get the rows(records) I want by removing the RequestDateTime column from the Select query SELECT distinct et.configname as 'Part Number', substring(email,(charindex('@',email)+1),len(email)) as 'email ending',u.company_name as 'Company',u.city as 'City',u.country as 'Country' --,RequestDateTime as 'Date Downloaded'from new_products.dbo.modelrequests etleft outer join cc_host.dbo.usr_list u on et.username = convert(varchar(50),u.[user_id])where interfacename like '%download%'and result=0and u.country = 'JP'and CONVERT(DATETIME, RequestDateTime, 102)>= convert(DATETIME,'12/5/2007', 102)GROUP BY email,et.configname,u.company_name,u.city,u.country,requestdatetime I want to show the RequestDateTime for the 1600 records that do get selected. How can I put RequestDateTime back in the resulting table output without it being part of the Distinct clause?
View 3 Replies View RelatedJust wondering if it's possible to select distinct results from the where clause?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am having a heck of a time figuring out what controls how/when the generated SQL for a report puts a DISTINCT clause in front of it.
For instance, not that this report makes any sense, but I have 58 rows in my fact table/entity €“ If I pull in a lookup field and execute, the distinct is put in the query and I basically get a list of the possible domain values. It runs the whole joined table query to get them, but it does list (in this case) just 4 records. Now I put in the primary ID of the fact entity and the distinct goes away and I get my 58 rows. If I put two lookup fields, the DISTINCT is back. If I pull in the description field (text string just a direct source field mapping not part of the identifying attributes), the distinct is there. If I pull in the Company Name field on a different entity (which is essentially the same as pulling in Description only it is part of the identifying attributes), there is no DISTINCT. I can pull in all my fields on this entity and none of them drive the distinct. And I swear (ok, I am probably lying but not on purpose) the field/attribute and roles properties are all the same on the attributes. But you get my general question/situation...
Any insight for me? Does it have to do with how I am building the report rather than the underlying model?
Thanks in advance,
HiI am new to SQL and am having a problem. I need to fix my query to do the following...2) get a total of the number of rows returned.
DECLARE @StartDate varchar(12)DECLARE @EndDate varchar(12)DECLARE @Region varchar(20)
SET @StartDate = '01/01/2002'SET @EndDate = '12/31/2008'SET @Region = 'Central'
SELECTA.createdon,A.casetypecodename,A.subjectidname,A.title,A.accountid,A.customerid,A.customeridname,B.new_Region,B.new_RegionName
FROM dbo.FilteredIncident AINNER JOIN dbo.FilteredAccount B ON A.customerid = B.accountid
WHERE (A.createdon >=@StartDate AND A.createdon <= @EndDate)AND (B.new_RegionName = @Region)AND (A.casetypecode = 2)
Hi,
I wonder if its possible to perform a ORDER BY clause in an SELECT DISTINCT sql query whereby the AS SINGLECOLUMN is used. At present I am recieving error: ORDER BY items must appear in the select list if SELECT DISTINCT is specified. My guess is that I cant perform the Order By clauses because it cant find the columns individually. It is essentail I get this to work somehow...
Can anyone help? Thanks in advance
Gemma
HiI have this query I made but I am not sure how to fully use the group by clause. IF @option = 'day'
BEGIN
SELECT userID, SUM(Correct) AS CORRECT, SUM(Wrong) as Wrong, SUM(AssitanceNeeded) AS AssitanceNeeded,
CONVERT(VARCHAR(10),TimeDateStamp,101) As TimeDateStamp
FROM Charts
WHERE TimeDateStamp
BETWEEN DATEADD(d,-7,DATEDIFF(d,0,getdate() + 1))
AND
DATEADD(ss,-1,DATEADD(d,DATEDIFF(d,0,getdate())+ 1 , 0)) AND UserID = @UserID
GROUP BY UserID,TimeDateStamp
ENDSo I get a result like this:BB7EFE81-B532-46DC-B8D1-4E7A4186EEB0012003/23/2008BB7EFE81-B532-46DC-B8D1-4E7A4186EEB0012003/23/2008BB7EFE81-B532-46DC-B8D1-4E7A4186EEB0025103/23/2008BB7EFE81-B532-46DC-B8D1-4E7A4186EEB0020003/23/2008BB7EFE81-B532-46DC-B8D1-4E7A4186EEB0014003/23/2008BB7EFE81-B532-46DC-B8D1-4E7A4186EEB0012003/23/2008BB7EFE81-B532-46DC-B8D1-4E7A4186EEB0012003/23/2008 but I really just want it to be thisBB7EFE81-B532-46DC-B8D1-4E7A4186EEB001071 03/23/2008See I want everything with the same user name and date to be grouped together. But when I do that in my group clause it separates them all. Yet if I don't have my timeDateStamp in the group clause I get a syntax error.Thanks
I'm trying to use a GROUP BY clause in my SQL statement when retieving information from an SQL Server DB. The only problem is that it won't let me 'SELECT' columns from the database that are not part of the GROUP BY clause. Here is my example:
This works:
SELECT ColumnA, ColumnB FROM MyTable GROUP BY ColumnA, ColumnB
This does NOT work:
SELECT ColumnA, ColumnB FROM MyTable GROUP BY ColumnA
It simply will not let me have ColumnB in the SELECT clause unless I put it in the GROUP BY clause. Is there any way around this? Because I need both columns to display in the page, but I only want to group them by one column.
I'm coming from MySQL, and in MySQL what I want to do is perfectly legal. However, in SQL Server it's not...
Any ideas?
in select apart of my statment I have the below code, but I want to exclude it from the group by clause, is there a way I can do this??
(cast(timesheethours.hoursworked as char) + '' + cast
(timesheethours.payrate as char) + ''+ objects.FileAs) as 'workers details',
Thanks
Dave,
Hi all,
Got a problem here, I am not quite familiar yet with the sql group by clause. As an illustration, I have a table with column StoreName and Sales.
StoreName Sales
DFA_Main 50
DFA_Main 50
DFA_Branch 60
DFA_Branch 60
DFA_OtherBranch 10
MMDA_Main 50
MMDA_Main 50
MMDA_Branch 30
MMDA_Branch 30
In my understanding if we are going to group this table by StoreName the result will be:
StoreName Sales
DFA_Main 100
DFA_Branch 120
DFA_OtherBranch 10
MMDA_Main 100
MMDA_Branch 60
But what would be the sql statement to produce an output like this:
StoreName Sales
DFA 230
MMDA 160
Is it possible for me to do that? Thanks for the help in advance.
===============
JSC0624
===============
In SQL, HAVING clause cannot be used without GROUP BY operation.
View 9 Replies View RelatedHi all,
I have this stored procedure and I want it to produce the results to GROUP BY Style1, Style2, StyleColor, Whrse_No, Bin_No ...... This procedure is used by a crystal report file to produce a report.... Below is the code:
( I think that the problem is in that some fields which are not summed have to be somehow gropued or modified
)
------------------ Seelct part simply slects several variables where sum of them are summed
select Style1 ,style2,StyleColor,Description,Whrse_No, Whrse_Desc, Bin_no, size_cd, Nbr_Sizes
, Size_Desc01, Size_Desc02, Size_Desc03, Size_Desc04, Size_Desc05
, Size_Desc06, Size_Desc07,Size_Desc08, Size_Desc09, Size_Desc10
, Size_Desc11, Size_Desc12, Size_Desc13, Size_Desc14, Size_Desc15 , OnHandQty_Total = sum ( OnHandQty_Total)
, OnHandQty_Sz1 = sum (OnHandQty_Sz1), OnHandQty_Sz2 = sum (OnHandQty_Sz2), OnHandQty_Sz3 = sum (OnHandQty_Sz3), OnHandQty_Sz4 = sum (OnHandQty_Sz4), OnHandQty_Sz5 = sum (OnHandQty_Sz5)
, OnHandQty_Sz6 = sum (OnHandQty_Sz6), OnHandQty_Sz7 = sum (OnHandQty_Sz7), OnHandQty_Sz8 = sum (OnHandQty_Sz8), OnHandQty_Sz9 = sum (OnHandQty_Sz9), OnHandQty_Sz10 = sum (OnHandQty_Sz10)
, OnHandQty_Sz11 = sum (OnHandQty_Sz11), OnHandQty_Sz12 = sum (OnHandQty_Sz12), OnHandQty_Sz13 = sum (OnHandQty_Sz13), OnHandQty_Sz14 = sum (OnHandQty_Sz14), OnHandQty_Sz15 = sum (OnHandQty_Sz15)
, Total_OnHandNeg
, CompanyName
, Date
from #rInventoryOnHandStyle_Whse
Where 1 = 1
' + @sAND10 + '
------------- Group Rule
Group By Style1, style2, StyleColor, Whrse_No, Bin_no
' + @OrderBy + '
'
--)
EXEC(@cmd)
GO
Hi,I was wondering if anyone out there can help me with this SQL problem:I have a database that has two tables: EMPLOYEE and JOB_TITLEThe EMPLOYEE Table consists of a salary and job_title _code columns,among many others; the JOB_TITLE table contains job_title_code column,among many others.The SQL problem is: Select the employees' last names and Group them bySalary within their job_title_code. I am new to SQL statements andkinda puzzled on how to solve this problem. I would appreciate any helpI can get on this. Thanks a lot in advance.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have two tables
A. TEST_SUBJECTS_TBL with the following columns . This table contains the subjects in a test
1. TEST_SUBJECT_ID PK
2. SUBJECT_ID FK
3. TEST_ID FK
4. PM // This is the passing marks for the subject
B. TEST_MARKS_TBL with the following columns This table stores the marks scored by students for each subject
1. TEST_SUBJECT_ID FK
2. STUDENT_ID FK
3. MARKS_OBTAINED
I need a query which gives me the max, min,avg marks obtained in each subject for a test and the total number of students who have passed in the subject
The query output should be something like this
___________________________________________________________________
SubjectID MaxMarks MinMarks AvgMarks TotalStudentsPassed
___________________________________________________________________
1 90 30 44 11 6
2 80 24 22 33 8
......
......
I can use a groupby to find max,min and avg marks but finding total students passed is posing a problem.
Greetings!
Why does the select statement must have the same non aggregated columns which are also part of the group by clause?
I have a feeling it's to do with the way the SQL Server database engine actually executes the query? i.e. the select part is the last thing the engine performs (after doing the joins and the filtering etc...).
Your help would be appreciated.
create table A
(
USERID int,
USER varchar(20),
TTYPE varchar(20),
DETAIL varchar(20),
);
insert into A(
1,'X','Credit','Amount xxx',
1,'X','Debit', 'Amount xxx',
2,'Y','Debit', 'Amount xx',
2,'Y','Debit', 'Amount xxx',
1,'X','Debit', 'Amount xxxx',
1,'X','Credit', 'Amount xxxx',
);
Create table B
(
USERID int,
TRANSACTION int
);
insert into B select USERID, COUNT(case when TTYPE='Credit' 1 else null end) as TRANSACTION from A group by USERID
[Error Code: 8118, SQL State: S1000] Column 'A.DETAIL' is invalid in the select list because it is not contained in an aggregate function and there is no GROUP BY clause.
Any suggestions......
I have two tables
A. TEST_SUBJECTS_TBL with the following columns . This table contains the subjects in a test
1. TEST_SUBJECT_ID PK
2. SUBJECT_ID FK
3. TEST_ID FK
4. PM This is the passing marks for the subject
B. TEST_MARKS_TBL with the following columns This table stores the marks scored by students for each subject
1. TEST_SUBJECT_ID FK
2. STUDENT_ID FK
3. MARKS_OBTAINED
I need a query which gives me the max, min,avg marks obtained in each subject for a test and the total number of students who have passed in the subject
The query output should be something like this
___________________________________________________________________
SubjectID MaxMarks MinMarks AvgMarks TotalStudentsPassed
___________________________________________________________________
1 90 30 44 11 6
2 80 24 22 33 8
......
......
I can use a groupby to find max,min and avg marks but finding total students passed is posing a problem. How do i find the total students passed ?
I am making a website where users go to a page that lists every Program in their area. The first time the page loads they see all the Programs, then then can filter it down with drop down lists. I have everything working except for the Category because some programs have more than one category. The select is working good but I get duplicates.
Here it is:
SELECT DISTINCT
p.ProgramID,
p.ProgramName,
p.ProgramCity,
p.ProgramState,
p.ProgramCountyID,
p.ProgramHours,
p.ProgramContactName,
p.ProgramPhone,
p.ProgramEmail,
p.ProgramGrades,
p.ProgramTransportation,
pc.ProgramID,
pc.CategoryID
FROM
Programs p,
ProgramCategories pc
WHERE
p.ProgramCountyID IS NOT NULL AND
p.ProgramCity IS NOT NULL AND
p.ProgramHours IS NOT NULL AND
p.ProgramGrades IS NOT NULL AND
p.ProgramTransportation IS NOT NULL AND
p.ProgramID = pc.ProgramID AND
pc.CategoryID IS NOT NULL
GROUP BY
p.ProgramID
ORDER BY
p.ProgramName ASC
When I have just p.ProgramID in the GROUP BY clause, I get the error:
"column name" is invalid in the select list because it is not contained in either an aggregate function or the GROUP BY clause.
But when I put all the column names in the GROUP BY clause, I still get duplicates. What can I do to stop this. When the user selects a category the pc.CategoryID IS NOT NULL changes to pc.CategoryID = 3 (or whatever they select) and everything works the way its supposed to. I just want each individual program to show only once when the page first loads.
Thanks for your time
Dave
I'm trying to set up my adhoc query to return just one single record, which is aliased as 'foreign' in my sql statement (which is just the total amount of foreign overseas orders for just one day. All Sale_Type_Ids over 2 [integer datatype] are foreign orders):
SELECT SUM(CASE WHEN Orders.Sale_Type_Id > 2 THEN Orders.Sale_Type_Id ELSE NULL END) AS foreignFROM Orders INNER JOIN Processing ON Orders.ID = Processing.Order_IDWHERE (Processing.Orderdate = '20050915') AND (Processing.status = 1)GROUP BY CASE WHEN Orders.Sale_Type_Id > 2 THEN Orders.Sale_Type_Id ELSE NULL ENDHAVING (SUM(CASE WHEN Orders.Sale_Type_Id > 2 THEN Orders.Sale_Type_Id ELSE NULL END) >= 0)
..but my resultset is returning two records. If I remove the HAVING clause, it will return three records, with one being blank.???.netsports
Code is:
select
case when ItemCode is null then '-'
else ItemCode
End,
case when sum(RecdQty) is null then '-'
else sum(RecdQty)
End
from ItemMaster where ItemCode='V001' group by ItemCode
Problem Statement:
If query is not getting any records for above mentioned condition, then I want zero to be displayed if datatype is int (i.e. for sum(RecdQty) field) and '-' to be diplayed if datatype is varchar (i.e. for ItemCode field).
In this situation, "ItemCode is null" and "sum(RecdQty) is null" conditions are not been utilised.
Is this a limitation of case or group by clause?
I have a a grid (Fig-1) where i have LineID and corresponding RankValue. I want to sort out the Grid like (Fig-2) where It will be sorted based on Rank Value(Higher to lower) but LineID group should maintain. I am using SqlServer 2008.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI was wondering what the best way to write a GROUP BY clause when there are many (and time consuming) operations in the fields by grouped.
Fictious example:
SELECT DeptNo, AVG(Salary) FROM Department GROUP BY DeptNo;
This will give me the average salary per department. Let's say, however that
I had 10-15 fields being returned (along with the AVG(Salary)) and some fields even had operations being performed on them. Is it better to create a temporary table to calculate the sum per department (or a VIEW) and then
perform a JOIN with the rest of the data?
Fictious example:
SELECT DATENAME(y, StartDate), DATENAME(m, StartDate), DATEPART(d, StartDate), SUBSTR(DeptName, 1, 10), SomeFunction(SomeField), SomeFunction(SomeField), AVG(Salary)
GROUP BY DATENAME(y, StartDate), DATENAME(m, StartDate), DATEPART(d, StartDate), SUBSTR(DeptName, 1, 10), SomeFunction(SomeField), SomeFunction(SomeField);
Am I better off writing my query this way or using a JOIN on some temporary table or view?
Thanks
When trying to build a report in sql server 2005 business intelligence dev studio (to deploy to report server) based on the following query I get an error msg.
Error in group by clause.
Unable to parse query text.
SELECT sub.*, ap.apat_code
FROM k_apptreg ap,
(SELECT R.REFL_DATE, R.EVENT_NO, C.PREFERRED_NAME, C.SURNAME, R.ANNLAPPT_DATE, R.CLNP_CODE, P.SURNAME AS CLINICIAN,
R.DEPT_CODE, D .DEPT_TITLE, R.PT_CODE, R.REFLREAS_DESC, R.HOSP_CODE, R.REFP_CODE, MAX(A.APPT_DATE)
AS LAST_APPT
FROM ORACARE.K_REFLREG R, ORACARE.K_CPIREG C, ORACARE.K_DEPTLIST D, ORACARE.K_PROFREG P, ORACARE.K_APPTREG A
WHERE R.PT_CODE = C.PT_CODE AND R.DEPT_CODE = D .DEPT_CODE AND R.HOSP_CODE = D .HOSP_CODE AND
R.CONS_MD_CODE = P.MPROF_CODE AND R.EVENT_NO = A.EVENT_NO (+) AND (R.ANNLAPPT_DATE < :PARAM1) AND
a.xtend_ind = 'Y'
GROUP BY R.REFL_DATE, R.EVENT_NO, C.PREFERRED_NAME, C.SURNAME, R.ANNLAPPT_DATE, R.CLNP_CODE, P.SURNAME, R.DEPT_CODE,
D .DEPT_TITLE, R.PT_CODE, R.REFLREAS_DESC, R.HOSP_CODE, R.REFP_CODE
ORDER BY r.event_no) sub
WHERE ap.event_no (+) = sub.event_no AND sub.last_appt = ap.appt_date (+) AND xtend_ind = 'Y'
ORDER BY sub.annlappt_date
This is my queryselect ano,max(date),a_subject from MY_TAB where table_name='xyz' andano=877group by a_subject,ano order by a_subjectANOmax(Date)A_Subject8772005-01-20 00:00:00.000Subject_18771900-01-01 00:00:00.000Subject_28772004-12-20 00:00:00.000Subject_38772005-01-19 00:00:00.000Subject_4--------------------------------------------------------------------------When I put the status column in, it fetches all the rows.select ano,max(date),a_subject,status from MY_TAB wheretable_name='xyz' and ano=877 group by a_subject,ano,status order bya_subjectANOmax(Date)A_SubjectStatus8772005-01-20 00:00:00.000Subject_1Not Started8771900-01-01 00:00:00.000Subject_2Not Started8772004-12-20 00:00:00.000Subject_3Completed8771900-01-01 00:00:00.000Subject_3Not Started8771900-01-01 00:00:00.000Subject_4Not Started8772005-01-19 00:00:00.000Subject_4Not Started-----------------------------------------------------------------------now what i want isANOmax(Date)A_SubjectStatus8772005-01-20 00:00:00.000Subject_1Not Started8771900-01-01 00:00:00.000Subject_2Not Started8772004-12-20 00:00:00.000Subject_3Completed8772005-01-19 00:00:00.000Subject_4Not StartedThanks a lot for your help.AJ
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'd like to update the attribute Active of the table COMPANY_BRANCH to the value 0 (or false, since it is a bin field) on the below recordset:
SELECT COMPANY_BRANCH.CompBranchID, MAX(PLACEMENT.ExpirationDate) AS Expr1
FROM COMPANY_BRANCH INNER JOIN
PLACEMENT ON COMPANY_BRANCH.CompBranchID = PLACEMENT.ProducerBranchID
GROUP BY COMPANY_BRANCH.CompBranchID
HAVING (MAX(PLACEMENT.ExpirationDate) < DATEADD(yyyy, - 1, GETDATE()))
yet, I am unable to understand the concept on how this can be done. If I put it into query designer and change the query type to update, the code that gets generated is not correct - can someone help me?
I have a quite big SQL query which would be nice to be used using UNION betweern two Select and Where clauses. I noticed that if both Select clauses have Where part between UNION other is ignored. How can I prevent this?
I found a article in StackOverflow saying that if UNION has e.g. two Selects with Where conditions other one will not work. [URL] ....
I have installed SQL Server 2014 and I tried to use tricks mentioned in StackOverflow's article but couldn't succeeded.
Any example how to write two Selects with own Where clauses and those Selects are joined with UNION?
I have recently started working with a new group of people and I find myself doing a lot of reporting. While doing this reporting I have been writing a TON of sql. Some of my queries were not performing up to par and another developer in the shop recommended that I stay away from the "GROUP BY" clause.
Backing away from the "GROUP BY" clause and using "INNER SELECTS" instead as been more effective and some queries have gone from over 1 minute to less that 1 second.
Obviously if it works then it works and there is no arguing that point. My question to the forum is more about gather some opinions so that I can build an opinion of my own.
If I cannot do a reasonable query of a couple of million records using a group by clause what is the problem and what is the best fix?
Is the best fix to remove the "GROUP BY" and write a query that is a little more complex or should I be looking at tuning the database with more indexes and statistics?
I want to make sure that this one point is crystal clear. I am not against following the advice of my coworker and avoiding the "GROUP BY" clause. I am only intersted in listening to a few others talk about why the agree or disagree with my coworked so that I can gain a broader understanding.
I am developing Staff Allocation System,
database is sql server 2000.
I have problem in retrieve the staff informations,
employee working which Project and what project have assign to him, what is his assign project or contract no,
One employee working more then one project, retrieve information one employee how many projects are working,
What is his approved position, what is his assign position.
It the main data have to retrieve, as well as retrieve all fields which related to those tables.
I use this query.
select name,apppos approved_position,appcont approved_contract,appdate employee_appr_date,munref Municipality_Ref,dcilref DCIL_REF,projtype Project_Type,strdate Project_str_date,comdate Projcet_comp_date,extdate Proejct_ext_date,dept,emptype Employee_Type from contract,emp,apprecords where contract.rec_id=emp.rec_id and emp.rec_id=apprecords.rec_id and apprecords.name='dewachi'
above query retrieve no data,
how can use group by clause in the above query ?
group by apprecords.appcontract
group by clause give error.
above query have to retrieve data from the three tables, I have four tables, what query I use so that all four tables data retrieve like this.
Name, approved_position, approved_contract,assign_position,assign_contract,startdate,completion_date,........ and so on…
Group by apprecords.appposition
……….
Contract Table (basic data entry contract table)
-------------------------------------------------------
rec_id
Contract No.
ProjectType
StartDate
CompletionDate
ExtendedDate
Employee Table (basic data entry employee table)
---------------------------------------------------------
rec_id
EmpNo
Name
Position
Department
EmployeeType
Approved Records Table (in this table all information about
the employee and his approved
position and contract )
------------------------------------------------------------------------
rec_id
Name
Approved Date
MunicipalityRefNo
DCILRefNo
ApprovedPosition
ApprovedContract
Assign Project Table (in this table all information about the
employee his assign the project)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
rec_id
Name
AssignPosition
AssignContract
EmpProjectStartDate
EmpProjectEndDate
ShiftNo
ProjectStatus
Regards.
MATEEN
I'm trying to list salesreps (if they have any sales for a particular date) with their total sales amounts for a queried date, but when running this sql string in QueryAnalyzer, it says there is an error with syntax on Line 1 near "s" :SELECT o .Rep_ID, o .ID, s.ID, SUM(b.orderamount) AS totalsales, b.order_ID
FROM (SELECT b.Deal_ID
FROM btransactions b
WHERE b.BoardDate = '20050815') SalesReps s INNER JOIN
orders o ON o .Rep_ID = s.ID INNER JOIN
b ON o.ID = b.Deal_ID
GROUP BY d .Rep_ID, d .ID, s.ID, b.order_ID
HAVING (SUM(b.orderamount) > 0)???.NetSports
tblScore contains score for each problem
id problemID score
------------------------
1 1 10
2 2 30
tblSubmission contains problem submissions for each user
id user problemID accepted
-----------------------------------------------
1 UserA 1 0
2 UserA 1 0
3 UserA 1 1
4 UserA 2 1
5 UserB 1 0
6 UserB 1 1
7 UserB 2 1
For UserA :
- For problemID 1
-> submitted three times
-> rejected for first two submission and accepted on third submission.
- For problemID 2
-> submitted one time
-> accepted on first submission
For UserB :
- For problemID 1
-> submitted two times
-> rejected for first submission and accepted on second submission.
- For problemID 2
-> submitted one time
-> accepted on first submission
Now I would like to process the table and want to get the following result :
user Score
--------------------------
UserA 36 (6 + 30)
UserB 38 (8 + 30)
Explanation :
- For each rejected submission, a -2 point penalty.
- UserA have submitted probelmID 1
- > score of problemID 1 is 10.
- > first two times rejectd
- > third time accepted.
-> score = 10 - 4 = 6
- UserA have submitted problemID 2
- > score of problemID 2 is 30
- > first time accepted. No penalty will be counted
- > score = 30
so final score for UserA = 30 + 6 = 36
Similar for UserB.
Hi All,
I've the following view in my DB and I need to modify it in such a way that it should be grouped by 'categoryId' and display the count of rows that come under each categoryId. In brief, I need to use 'Group By' clause and 'Count/SUM' aggregate function.
Here is my view.
if exists (select * from dbo.sysobjects where id = object_id(N'[dbo].[MessageCategoryView]') and OBJECTPROPERTY(id, N'IsView') = 1)
drop view [dbo].[MessageCategoryView]
GO
CREATE VIEW MessageCategoryView AS
SELECT
m.subjectSUBJECT,
m.senderidSENDERID,
m.createdateCREATEDATE,
m.completedateCOMPLETEDATE,
m.format MSGFORMAT,
m.isconfidentialISCONFIDENTIAL,
m.queueidQUEUEID,
mc.messageid MESSAGEID,
mc.categoryid CATEGORYID,
cv.label CATEGORYLABEL,
cv.hierarchystring HIERARCHYSTRING,
cv.hotkeys HOTKEYS
FROM
kc_message m
JOIN kc_messagecategory mc on m.messageid = mc.messageid
JOIN CategoryView cv on mc.categoryid = cv.categoryid
WHERE
mc.type not in (3,5)
Can anyone please help me out in resolving this.
Thanks in advance,
Sujatha