is there any more efficient way for example to implement the next query?
SELECT s1.article, dealer, s1.price FROM shop s1 JOIN ( SELECT article, MAX(price) AS price FROM shop GROUP BY article) AS s2 ON s1.article = s2.article AND s1.price = s2.price; WHERE dealer = 'dealer sample'
i want to break 2 by 2 rows in reportceiling(rownumber(nothing)/2).i used this expression in row group. URL....but i want to use this expression in matrix and that matirx is with in list . so i am getting error . how to use rownumber in list.here i used list to break the page wise id
I am using Bulk Copy command for Exporting data table wise from database to csv files and it was working fine. Since last 3-4 days when exporting for some tables data in csv file is coming junk.
When expoting data from excel to sql server table, using SSIS package, after exporting is done, how would i check source rows are equal to destination rows. If not to throw an error message.
How can we handle transactions in SSIS 1. when some error/something happens during export and the # of rows are not exported fully to destination, how to rollback the transaction in SSIS.
When expoting data from excel to sql server table, using SSIS package, after exporting is done, how would i check source rows are equal to destination rows. If not to throw an error message.
I have a SQL script to insert data into a table as below:
INSERT into [SRV1INS2].BB.dbo.Agents2 select * from [SRV2INS14].DD.dbo.Agents
I just want to set a Trigger on Agents2 Table, which could delete all rows in the table , before carry out any Insert operation using above statement.I had below Table Trigger on [SRV1INS2].BB.dbo.Agents2 Table as below: But it did not perform what I intend to do.
USE [BB] GO /****** Object: Trigger Script Date: 24/07/2015 3:41:38 PM ******/ SET ANSI_NULLS ON GO SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
I have created a table Table with name as Varchar and id as int. Now i have started inserting the rows like, insert into Table values ('arun',20).Yes i have inserted a row in the table. Now i have got the values " arun's ", 50. insert into Table values('arun's',20) My sqlserver is giving me an error instead of inserting the row. How will you solve this problem?
Hi, consider my table, s.no priority status 1 2 pending 2 3 pending 3 0 completed 4 1 pending 5 0 completed Now, if I insert a record as, 6 1 pending the priority must be reset as follows, s.no priority status 1 3 pending 2 4 pending 3 0 completed 4 2 pending 5 0 completed 6 1 pending Im using c# and sql server. How can i do it? Thanks, Jasmeeta.
Is it possible to change/set the priority of databases? (Win2K, SQL 2K)
We have an evnironment which is somewhat lacking in resource, and would like to place the priority of one of the databases lower than the other so that the processing on the main database is carried out before the secondary one.
If there isn't any way to do this for the database level - is it possible for a specific user?
Hopefully I havnt been too vague here - but if there is any more info I should be passing on let me know.
In my Sequence container task, I have 3 data flow task ( one data flow task is based on the constraint option Expression). 3 are running simultaneously, is there a way to assign a priorty which one should finish first before the other starts.
If I make all of them in one sequence then the conditional task come in between which may stop the execution of the 3rd task depending upon condition.
We are in the process of moving some data from one structure to another. The complete script takes very long time to complete in out production environment.
The script can maybe filtered even more, so it can run in small steps. The only problem here is that we would like it to be transactional.
But i came to wonder - are there any way to tell before starting a t-sql statement that it should run with low priority? This way it could run for 2 days, without having any severe impact on the production environment?
Is it possible in SQL Server to set the priority at which a query will run for certain users. I have some users who's queries I never want to take over the database. These queries may take 10's of mintes to complete, and will slow down the server and affect the performance of more important queries. Is there a way to keep this from happeneing?
Hello. I'm still a newbie in using MSSQL 2000. Got a code here in this site for sending formatted email usp_send_cdosysmail? How do i set the priority of the email?
I have a table which contains a Create datetimefield which has a default on the current date , a priorityfield and another datetimefield which will be the due date and has to be calculated by the first date and the priority field,
How can i do this and what fields must i have.
Does someone does this? can someone help me with this?
Does anyone know how to set a database priority? I have a SQL Server that contains multipule databases. One of the databases is very high priority. I need to make sure that no matter what is running on the server that this database's processes take priority and nothing slows it down.
Hi, when there are lot of processes executing the select statement on a table, and I KILL all these processes (KILL spid) and drop the table, is the KILL statement have the first priority to execute and drop table can be done in short time? I am afraid that the select statement will take long time to be roll back if the table is huge...please advise.
I've searched enough to know that this ability probably doesn't existin our current setup, thus the reason I'm coming to the community now.When doing a database backup in Enterprise Manager (SQL Server 2000sp4), is there a priority level setting so that I can put less load onthe CPU? Our small office uses one server for everything and when I doa 12:00 pm full backup of our live DB, the server slows to a crawl forabout 4 or 5 minutes. I'd like to see the backup take longer but putless load on the server so we can to use it. If this setting doesn'texist, I may need to explore another backup method...but that's anothertopic for another day.Thanks,Gabe
I have a report with a category that filters for "top N" categories, but it is preventing the entire data set from being evaluated so that the series subtotals are incorrect. Is there a way to change the precedence, so that the subtotals are computed across the entire data set, and the "top N" is evaluated afterwards?
Using the the NumId from TitleData, I would like to delete thecorresponding row in Bookdata using pure SQL. I want it to delete allrows in bookdata where the Titledata.NumID is a match to bookdata.idThe two tables are linked in that the NumId of table Titledata isidentical to the Id of table bookdata. I can, using ADO, loop thrudeleting one by one but I would like to do this in a pure SQLstatement. Is this possible? Any help is appreciated.I was thinking something like this way :"Delete from Bookdata where Titledata.NumID = Bookdata.id"But of course it will error.My current code is:(frmlogon.tablename is really Titledata)Dim rstry As New ADODB.RecordsetDim values As VariantSQLQuery = "Select Numid from " & frmLogon.TablenameSet rstry = frmLogon.cnConnection.Execute(SQLQuery)values = rstry.GetRowsSet rstry = Nothing'now loop thruDim xx As Integerxx = 0Do Until xx > UBound(values, 2)SQLQuery = "Delete from Bookdata where bookdata.Id = '" & values(0,xx) & "'"frmLogon.cnConnection.Execute (SQLQuery)xx = xx + 1Loop'create statements for 2 tables involved areconn.Execute "CREATE TABLE TitleData" & _"(Id INT IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY," & _"NumId INT DEFAULT 0 )"conn.Execute "CREATE TABLE BookData" & _"(Id INT IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL," & _"Titles TEXT DEFAULT ''," & _"GeneralNote TEXT DEFAULT ''," & _"Author VARCHAR(100) DEFAULT ''," & _"Imprint VARCHAR(100) DEFAULT ''," & _"ISBN VARCHAR(100) DEFAULT ''," & _"Description VARCHAR(100) DEFAULT ''," & _"CallNumberPre VARCHAR(5) DEFAULT ''," & _"CallNumber VARCHAR(25) DEFAULT '',LOCNumber VARCHAR(30) DEFAULT '',"& _"Accession VARCHAR(25) DEFAULT ''," & _"Bibliography VARCHAR(100) DEFAULT ''," & _"Series VARCHAR(100) DEFAULT ''," & _"MyStatus VARCHAR(70) DEFAULT ''," & _"Barcode VARCHAR(50) DEFAULT ''," & _"LocalData VARCHAR(100) DEFAULT ''," & _"CheckoutPeriod VARCHAR(10) DEFAULT ''," & _"CatalogCard TEXT DEFAULT ''," & _"Summary TEXT DEFAULT ''," & _"MyCount VARCHAR(10) DEFAULT ''," & _"ItemDate DATETIME DEFAULT ''," & _"MyUser VARCHAR(50) DEFAULT ''," & _"MarcData TEXT DEFAULT ''," & _"SdlsRecord TEXT DEFAULT '', LOSC VARCHAR(5) DEFAULT '', LOSNDecimal(14,6) DEFAULT 0," & _"Edits Char(1) DEFAULT '', TitleDuplicate VARCHAR(50) DEFAULT '')"
Dear Friends, Is there any way to display a table data separately like odd rows and even rows?I dont know this is possible or not?If it is possible means how can i achieve it?Please guide me a proper way. Thanks all!
I have a long stored procedure that performs some inserts and updates on the table that users are accessing through a user interface. We this stored procedure runs users experience slowness, is there any way I can get the stored procedure runs with a lowest priority so that user will be able to perform their tasks first.
Is there a way to give a particular query greater system resources,such as share of the processor?I have two queries that were started from Query Analyzer. One is verylong, the other rather short. However the long one is taking almostall the processor resources and not allowing the short one to complete.I'd like to allocate more of the processor to the short one until itis done.I am the admin on this system and have access to Enterprise Mgr.Thanks.
Not sure if this is the forum to post this question to - if there's a more appropriate forum please let me know.
I have a SQL Server 2005 box which gets accessed in two ways - an application with it's own login and sprocs which get accessed through reporting services with its own login. What I've found is that the application will get timeouts on its queries when people are running reports which use time intensive sprocs (> 1 minute to run).
Is there a way to give a particular login a higher priority so that it won't timeout when other logins access these sprocs?
Hi all, I have a stored proc. which is going to run 3 days long. So , i was looking for some setting (or) priority , which i can set in the stored proc. so that, if someone else is using the server, they should get high CPU Priority, and my process ( Stored Proc) should remain in suspended state, until CPU & Disk activity is low.
Note : The only way others are getting affected is because of hardware resources, because nobody is using those tables which is being used by STORED PROCEDURE.