New SQL User...v2005. I have been directed to Grant "View Server State" permissions to a user. However, I don't see it in the list of choices I can grant access to in Permissions, nor is there a visible hyperlink in an area that it is expected to be. I have also tried setting that permission in a query window to no avail as well. I can provide additional info if someone would like to work with me on this issue. Thanks!
View 1 RepliesHi to everybody,
I have a permission problems with user create for service.
I created an user without login in a database. I use this user for service broker activation procedure.So, this user have a certificate to exports in other database.
To generalize activation procedure of many service broker queue I try to use this piece of code :
DECLARE @QueueName nvarchar(MAX)
DECLARE @queue_id int
SELECT @queue_id = queue_id FROM sys.dm_broker_activated_tasks
WHERE spid = @@SPID
SELECT @QueueName = [name] FROM sys.service_queues
WHERE object_id = @queue_id
To use this DMV user need VIEW SERVER STATE grant but this is an user DB and I can't give this grant to user.
How can I do it?
Somebody can help me?
Thanks in advance
Luca
In SQL Server 2005 SP2 I want to grant the ability to create views to a user but in order to do this it requires that the users has the ability to grant alter on a schema.
Is there any way to grant this privilage without granting alter on schema also?
Have a certificate and symmetric key that i have used the following to GRANT to logins. How can I find out which SQL logins have the GRANT CONTROL and GRANT VIEW DEFINTION?
GRANT VIEW DEFINITION ON SYMMETRIC KEY:: Symetric1 TO Brenda
GRANT CONTROL ON CERTIFICATE:: Certificate1 to Brenda
I have a user who needs access to views like(dbo.viewnameabc1,dbo.viewnameabc2 and so on...) dbo.viewnameabc* and anytime the user creates the view he already have the permission to view those views....
View 3 Replies View RelatedHello, without going into the politics of why I'm asking, does anyone have a compiled list of functionality that only sysadmin's could do in 2000 that VIEW SERVER STATE permission opens up in 2005?
From the documentation, so far I've found fn_get_sql (and it's dm view) but I'd really like a complete list.
Hello, i have a problem regarding stored procedures and view server state.
I have an application with a lot of stored procedures, one of them checks data of the connected users.
In SQL 2000 i had no problem getting this information, but in SQL server 2005 i do.
my stored procedure looks like this:
ALTER PROCEDURE [dba].[applsp_GetConnectionInfo]
(
@DBName varchar(100)
)
WITH EXECUTE AS OWNER AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON
DECLARE @sCollationMaster VARCHAR(128);
DECLARE @sSqlString VARCHAR(900);
-- Determine collation from master database because collation from master and ultimo database may differ
SELECT @sCollationMaster = CAST(databasepropertyex('master', 'Collation') AS VARCHAR);
SET @sSqlString =
'SELECT max(status) AS Status, max(isnull(SCISUSENAME, ''ULTIMOLOGIN'')) AS Login
, MAX(Rtrim(Rtrim(convert(varchar(255), nt_domain)) + nt_username)) AS NTUser
, max(Rtrim(hostname)) AS Host, MAX(Rtrim(program_name)) AS Program
FROM master.dbo.sysprocesses JOIN dba.SCONNECTIONINFO on SCISPID = CAST(spid AS VARCHAR)
AND ( SCISUSENAME = ISNULL(loginame, '''') COLLATE ' + @sCollationMaster + ' OR ISNULL(loginame, '''') = ''ULTIMOLOGIN'')
WHERE ...... AND DB_NAME(dbid) = ''' + @DBName + '''
GROUP BY hostprocess
ORDER BY Login
';
EXEC(@sSqlString);
END
I've granted view server state permissions to my user 'dba' which is the db_owner.
When i execute the query in the stored procedure seperatly as dba i get all the info i need, but when i execute the stored procedure i don't see anything.
I seem to have the same problem with sp_who2
Executing it gives me information about everyone but when i put in a stored procedure like this:
alter procedure test
with execute as owner as
begin
EXEC sp_who2
end
I just see information about myself
I'd like to find out whether or not people grant VIEW DEFINITION to their developers in UAT and PROD environments. My view is that a developer shouldn't be able to touch a PROD environment at all (we also include UAT as PROD), and any issue in a production environment should be investigated by a DBA and escalated to the dev if necessary.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have a custom security working with forms authentication. When we browse to http://servername/reports the UILogon.aspx page comes up, and login with the Admin account is fine we can reach the report manager and see the folders. But when we login with account User1 , which is not an admin account.Login is fine but User1 does not see any folders in report manager. So how do i assign roles to User account when using custom security extension.
chi
On our production SQL 2005 servers I want to give developers readonly access to each user database and also give them the ability to see stored procedures. Readonly is handled through db_datareader, but how do I give them the ability to see stored procedures without granting permission to execute them?
Thanks, Dave
I have an Indexed View that joins a couple of tables.
The view data doesn't refresh after I insert a new row into one of the tables that the view uses.
I know that Indexed views cache the results, but I thought that views that depend on the tables would be automattically updated.
Any ideas?
Jon
Hi!
There is a view in our replicated SQL-2000 database, that returns all user tables and views with replication state (0 if not included into publication, 1 if included):
Code Snippet
CREATE VIEW [dbo].[ViewREPL_PublishedObjects]
AS
SELECT TOP 100 PERCENT
CASE [xtype]
WHEN 'U' THEN 'Table'
WHEN 'V' THEN 'View'
ELSE NULL END AS [Object Type],
[name] AS [Object Name],
CASE WHEN [replinfo] = 0
THEN 0 ELSE 1
END AS [Replicated]
FROM [sysobjects]
WHERE
[xtype] in ('U', 'V')
AND [status] > 0
ORDER BY
(CASE [xtype]
WHEN 'U' THEN 1
WHEN 'V' THEN 2
ELSE 10
END),
[name]
Now we need to upgrade our database to SQL-2005, but [sysobjects] table have been changed, so neither Replicated state could be determined according on [replinfo] column value, nor User/System object according on [status].
So, I need a view with same functionality, that will work under SQL-2005 and 2008.
Please, help!
GRANT SELECT ON [dbo].[TblAreaCatmap] TO [admin] prevent grant from being automaticly add to each column?
Is there a way when you issue a grant select to a table or a view to not also grant select for each column.
The problem is when you use the grant command it automaticly adds the grant command to each column. I want to grant the permission at the table level so when the table is scripted it only has a single grant command instead of a grant for the table and a grant for each column which is not needed.
The sql managemnt studion interface will allow you to do this but onlt by using the interface. If you issue the above command from a query window it also creates A GRANT FOR EVERY COLUMN. How can I stop this behavior.
I am writing a stored procedure which updates a table, but when I run the stored procedure using a login that I have granted execute privileges on, then I get a message that I cannot run an update on the table. This would happen in dynamic sql... while my SQL has parameter references, I don't think it is considered dynamic SQL?
sproc:
CREATE PROCEDURE [schemaname].[SetUserCulture]
@UserID int
, @Culture nvarchar(10)
AS
UPDATE dbo.SecUser
SET Culture = @Culture
WHERE UserID = @UserID
execute SQL:
EXEC schemaname.SetUserCulture @UserID = 9, @Culture = N'x'
error:
The UPDATE permission was denied on the object 'SecUser', database 'DatabaseName', schema 'schemaname'.
The 2.0 version of ASPSTATE is slightly different than the 1.1 version in that one table has one additional column and another table uses a different data type and size for the key. The 2.0 version also has a couple additional stored procedures.
We'd like to manage just one session state database if possible so we're trying to figure out if Microsoft supports using the new schema for 1.1 session state access (it seems to work, but our testing has been very light).
Is there any official support line on this? If not, can anyone comment on whether or not you'd expect it to work and why?
Thanks.
Hi,
I have currently a problem with setting up the permissions for some developers. My configuration looks like this.
DB A is the productive database.
DB B is a kind of "development" database.
Now we have a couple of users call them BOB, DAVID, ...
who are members of the db role db_reader and db_writer for the productive db a but they should be allowed to do nearly everything on db b.
Therefor I added them to the db role db_owner for db b.
For testing purposes I tried to "CREATE" a view TEST as BOB in database B but I received the error message
'Msg 262, Level 14, State 1, Procedure Test, Line 3
CREATE VIEW permission denied in database 'b'.'
I cross checked the permissions on db level and I even granted all available permissions on db level but nevertheless I receive this error message.
What's my mistake?
Of course it worked fine when I give them sysadmin rights but then they have far too much permissions.
Regards,
Stefan
Hi,
I'm trying to run the Bulk Insert statement but in order for me the run it, i need to have the sysadmin permission. Can someone show me how to grant sysadmin permission to my SQL Server user? This is really urgent. Thank you in advance.
I have around 600 databases in my server, a user need select access of all the databases. will i have to go one by one in all the dbs and create that user and give datareader role to him. or is thr any shorter way to do so????
View 8 Replies View RelatedHi There
The backup database permission seems to only be at a database level , grant backup database and db_backupoperator role only exist at a database level.
However i want to permission to a user to backup any database, and he must not be a sysadmin. I cannot find a server level role that can backup databases.
How can i do this? There are alot of database so granting the permission for every database seems a waste of time, also one would have to remember every time a new database is created to grant this permission.
There must be a way to do this at a server level?
Thanx
How do I grant a specific access to a schema. I have a request to grant a ddl access to a schema called Business_Banking.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi,
When I am trying to access SQL Server 2000 database from another machine i got this error
Server: MSg 17, Level 16, State 1 [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][DBNETLIB]SQL Server does not exist or access denied
but I could access the database on same server and in that server i could access other databases in different server.
I am getteing
need help
Query analyzer error Unable to connect server local Msg17, level 16,state 1
ODBC SQL server driver [DBNETLIB]SQL server does not exist
My sa account can not see the tables in the db. but can connect to the server
View 2 Replies View RelatedThe requirements are:
1. the user has read-only permissions to dbo tales.
2. the user can do everything within the rpt schema, which contains all objects analyzing dbo tables.
3. the user does not have any permission outside rpt schema, except permissions in #1.
The current solutions are:
1. grant the user select only on dbo tables.
2. make the user the owner of rpt schema.
3. Grant the user database permission on create table/create procedure/create view/create function.
My question is - in step 3, should I just grant "Alter" database permission to the user? Granting Alter seems to be cleaner and simpler. According to MSDN,
"Alter" confers the ability to change the properties, except ownership, of a particular securable. When granted on a scope, ALTER also bestows the ability to alter, create, or drop any securable that is contained within that scope.
hello,
What role or system privilege do I need to grant to a user if he need to read the data from a table which is in a link server object? where I can find the document about these commands.
Thanks
I have 3 servers taking part in an AlwaysOn AG.
I want to grant a user READ access to only one replica, and certainly not to the principle.
How do I go about doing this?
I have a 2GHZ cpu with 1GB of RAM. I occassionally see very slow (long) queries against a local SQL Server 2005 Express (SP2) database. The issue occurs against different SQL Queries, but all queries are rather basic select statements Perfmon shows that the SQL Server counter for the "MEMORY GRANT QUEUE WAIT Avg MS" gets extremely high (25000+ ms). Perfmon also also shows that PAGING is not occuring, and the system is not under unsual stress. The problem is not reproducible with MSDE.
Has anyone seen this issue, or have any recommendations for a next course of action?
We have mirroring setup for 5 dbs, 4 of which are synchronized and 1 which is in "synchronizing" state on the principal and "restoring" state on the mirror. Mirroring for all dbs has been working fine for the past several months and we have a witness that has allowed automatic failover in the past without problems.
This database has several bulk inserts performed throughout the day and am sure there is some latency due to the size of these transactions.
Not sure as to why this is happening all of a sudden, but the db in question has been in this state for the past 12 hrs. I checked the mirroring status on the principal and it states that it is "synchronizing: data is being transferred from principal to mirror", but the mirror server states that db is in "restoring" state. Can anyone suggest as to how I can get the database on the mirroring server to get back to "mirror, synchronizing/restoring..." state? Or suggest on how I can troubleshoot this?
Thanks in advance.
As an 'SA' I thought that you have permission to do anything on the server. Running an update command from Query Analyzer is throwing this error:
SQL Server 2000 SP3
Server: Msg 18456, Level 14, State 1, Line 1
Login failed for user 'sa'.
The table is in the dbo schema.
Has anyone seen this error before?
Hi
I want to build a class in ASP.Net 2.0 which will lookup if SQL server is up & running & whther connection is getting establish to the Database. if it fails it will try 3 time to reconnect. if no sucess then it will shoot a mail to Admin.
Please help me to achive this.
Thanks
Vishal.
Hello all,
I have a question concerning the ridiculous quagmire of SQL Server licensing…
How is SQL Server licensed when used to store session state information? Is MS claiming that this is an end user use of SQL Server functionality? Or, can we be realistic and say that I need a server license plus a device license for each web server?
Personally, I like everything about SQL Server except the licensing. Management at my company has already said that we’ll most likely be moving to either Firebird or Postgres after they found out how much it would cost to move from SQL 2k to SQL 2005. If MS wants us to buy processor licenses for SQL state servers, I guarantee we’ll be doing something else there as well. I wonder if Microsoft has any clue how much business they’re losing. Not just in SQL Server, but in their OS business as well.
Server: Msg 229, Level 14, State 5, Procedure sp_monitor, Line 167
EXECUTE permission denied on object 'sp_monitor', database 'master', owner 'dbo'.
How do I fix this? which roles, or permission is that? Is there a
easier way to find out solutions for these problems, as books online
does not seem to provide much help.
Thanks,
Vijay
IN THE SQL SERVER 2000 AND IN ALSO IN 2005 WHEN GOING FOR THE LOGGING IN TO THE SQL SERVER USING A PUBLIC IP, AND GIVING THE SQL SERVER AUTENTICATION IT IS GIVING THE FOLLOWING ERROR
Server: Msg 11, Level 16, State 1[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][TCP/IP Sockets]General network error. Check your network documentation.
THE SAME ISSUE HAPPENING WITH THE ODBC CONNECTION. CAN ANYONE EXPLAIN ME WITH THE FOLLOWING ERROR
DO NOT GIVE A SUGGESTION OF REINSTALLATION, BECAUSE TRIED THAT ONE TOO
REGARDS
CHAITANYA BABU YANAMADALA