Granting Select On Views
Dec 4, 2007Hello,
How do , I grant select privileges on all the Views of the database to a user in SQl 2005. All the tables and views in the database are under the dbo schema.
Thanks.
ADVERTISEMENT
Select * In Views
Apr 15, 2006People are telling me it is bad to putselect * from <atable>in a view. I better should list all fields of the table inside thedefinition of the view.I dont know exactly why but some say:A select * from makes sql server does a table scan.Is that true, even if i put a where on the select on the view? And what if idont list all fields in the select on the view?Thanks for the answer.Peter
View 33 Replies View RelatedSelect * In Views
Aug 16, 2007
Hi All,
Iam having 2 tables say Emp table and Department Table. Iam having a view which joins 2 tables.
example
select *,Department.DeptStatus, Department.DepartmentName from Employee INNER JOIN Department ON Department.deptno=Employee.DeptNO.
When I add a new column to the Employee table say EmployeeStatus then my view get corrupted.what i mean is that the last newly added column from emloyee table takes the Name as DeptStatus and shows values of the EmployeeStatus Column. We have been creating new Columns in SQL 2000 we never faced this issue but iam seeing this issue only in SQL Server 2005.
Thanks in Advance.
cheers,
Sada
Views Or Select
Aug 2, 2007Hai, I'm an novice in Sql Server. I wanna know why we are going for VIEWS instead of SELECT statement in Sql Server 2005. However, both are going to perform the same task (i.e, Retreiving data) from the database.
View 5 Replies View RelatedViews Vs SELECT Statement
Sep 9, 2007Is it better to use just a SELECT statement or a view when working with a small database? Does anyone know which would perform better?
............................................................thanks
Select From Database Without Grid Views Etc
Jul 9, 2006Hi,
I want to be able to select data from a database without using grid
view etc. I can set up a connection and bind it to a grid view but I
would like to do some data processing without showing it. Something like
select id from table where name = "x"
store id in idvar
store the row count to a variable rowcount
if rowcount > 0
select name from table2 where id = idvar
endif
etc
I can see how to set the sqldatasource select command but not how to run it and get results out of it. Please help
SMO Problem / Can't Select Non System Views Without Crash
Mar 5, 2006I've had a couple problems with SMO and I wonder if anyone else has. Specifically, when I run through stored procedures (just like your example) it is painfully slow. Maybe 5 a second. Another problem is filtering on nonsystem objects with either "SVR.SetDefaultInitFields(typeof(Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Smo.View), "IsSystemObject"); or View.isSystemObject.
Both cases crash my app. Any ideas?
Below are two ways that both crash or hang.
SVR.SetDefaultInitFields(typeof(Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Smo.View), "IsSystemObject");
foreach (Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Smo.View view in viewCollection)
{}
OR
foreach (Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Smo.View view in viewCollection)
{
if (!view.IsSystemObject)
{}
}
VIEWs - Can It Know Wether A SELECT, UPDATE, Etc Is Executing On It
Apr 6, 2000VIEW behaviour depending on what operation is run on it.
VIEW syntax is CREATE VIEW xx AS SELECT ... It would be very convinient to know wether a select, update, insert or delete is the operation executed on it so the view could take action accordingly, ie
CREATE VIEW xxx AS SELECT ..
CASE UPDATE THEN do_this
CASE SELECT THEN do_that etc.
Does anyone know if this is possible?
Views Containing SELECT * Do Not Recompile When Table Is Modified
Mar 17, 2008If I have a view such as: SELECT T.* FROM T
When I add a column to table T the view is not updated to reflect that change.
Furthermore, if there are other columns after the * in the view (for example SELECT T.*, GETDATE() as "My Date" FROM T) the last columns will contain incorrect data.
Is there a work around for this? An "auto-recompile when tables are modified" kind of option?
Thanks
Nick
PS: This is the script I used for testing:
create table tt (
test1 int primary key,
test2 int)
go
insert into tt (test1, test2) values (1,2)
go
create view vw_tt as select *, getdate() as "My Date" from tt
go
select * from vw_tt
go
create view vw_tt2 as select * from tt
go
alter table tt add test3 int
go
select * from vw_tt
select * from vw_tt2
select * from tt
drop table tt
drop view vw_tt
drop view vw_tt2
SQL Security :: How To Grant Select On All Views OR All Columns
Dec 14, 2011grant SELECT on all_columns to yogi_bear;
grant SELECT on all_objects to yogi_bear;
grant SELECT on all_views to yogi_bear;
but it doesn't work, why? I know how to do it with a cursor or dynamic sql, but why won't these sql statements work?
Want A Stored Procedure To Dynamically Select Views Pulled From A Table.
Feb 1, 2007I am building a dashboard features that allows user to select reports from a dropdownlist. It is pulling from a table called Reports (cols: ReportID, Description, sqlView) In this Report table the report is associated to a view that queries the report.
And the user's selections are stored in table called UserReport (cols: userID, ReportID, createDt) .
I need to get a Dataset to contain datables of all reports selected. (for example a user select 3 reports, the dataset should contain 3 datables that represent the report).
I want to accomplish this by create a store procedure that queries the Reports table and then dynamically executes the views that related to the user selected reports. Can anyone give me an example on how to create the storeprocedure?
Thanks,
CG
Grant User Group Select Access To All Views In Database
Sep 24, 2013I'm trying to grant a user group select access to all the views in a database. I already made a query which creates a result set whit the SQL Syntax I (displayed below) need but it seems to be impossible to get this result set executed after creation.
use [AdventureWorksDW2008R2]
SELECT
'GRANT SELECT ON [' + SCHEMA_NAME(Schema_id) + '].[' + name + '] TO [DOMAINGROUP]'
FROM sys.views;
Bulk Insert Into Views That Select From Table On Remote Server
Jul 20, 2005Hi all,We have an application through which we are bulk inserting rows into aview. The definition of the view is such that it selects columns froma table on a remote server. I have added the servers usingsp_addlinkedserver on both database servers.When I call the Commit API of oledb I get the following error:Error state: 1, Severity: 19, Server: TST-PROC22, Line#: 1, msg:SqlDumpExceptionHandler: Process 66 generated fatal exception c0000005EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION. SQL Server is terminating this process.I would like to know if we can bulk insert rows into a view thataccesses a table on the remote server using the "bulk insert" or bcpcommand. I tried a small test through SQL Query Analyser to use "bulkinsert" on a such a view.The test that I performed was the following:On database server 1 :create table iqbal (var1 int, var2 int)On database server 2 (remote server):create view iqbal as select var1,var2 from[DBServer1].[SomeDB].[dbo].[iqbal]set xact_abort onbulk insert iqbal from '\MachineIqbaliqbaldata.txt'The bulk insert operation failed with the following error message:[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][DBNETLIB]ConnectionCheckForData(CheckforData()).Server: Msg 11, Level 16, State 1, Line 0General network error. Check your network documentation.Connection BrokenThe file iqbaldata.txt contents were :112233If the table that the view references is on the same server then weare able to bulk insert successfully.Is there a way by which I should be able to bulk insert rows into aview that selects from a table on a remote server. If not then couldanyone suggest a workaround. I would actually like to know someworkaround to get the code working using OLEDB. Due to unavoidablereasons I cannot output the records to the file and then use bcp tobulk insert the records in the remote table. I need to have some wayof doing it using OLEDB.Thanks in advanceIqbal
View 7 Replies View RelatedAre Embedded Views (Views Within Views...) Evil And If So Why?
Apr 3, 2006Fellow database developers,I would like to draw on your experience with views. I have a databasethat includes many views. Sometimes, views contains other views, andthose views in turn may contain views. In fact, I have some views inmy database that are a product of nested views of up to 6 levels deep!The reason we did this was.1. Object-oriented in nature. Makes it easy to work with them.2. Changing an underlying view (adding new fields, removing etc),automatically the higher up views inherit this new information. Thismake maintenance very easy.3. These nested views are only ever used for the reporting side of ourapplication, not for the day-to-day database use by the application.We use Crystal Reports and Crystal is smart enough (can't believe Ijust said that about Crystal) to only pull back the fields that arebeing accessed by the report. In other words, Crystal will issue aSelect field1, field2, field3 from ReportingView Where .... eventhough "ReportingView" contains a long list of fields.Problems I can see.1. Parent views generally use "Select * From childview". This meansthat we have to execute a "sp_refreshview" command against all viewswhenever child views are altered.2. Parent views return a lot of information that isn't necessarilyused.3. Makes it harder to track down exactly where the information iscoming from. You have to drill right through to the child view to seethe raw table joins etc.Does anyone have any comments on this database design? I would love tohear your opinions and tales from the trenches.Best regards,Rod.
View 15 Replies View RelatedGranting Permissions
Dec 6, 2001I am trying to grant permission to one table for one individual and one group. I tried to accomplish this by simply going in and editing the permissions on the table through Enterprise Manager. It keeps getting stuck. I then ran the Grant select on (table name) to the group and it has been running for over 15 minutes. This should be something that is done relatively quickly.
Any advice would be great.
Thanks
Granting Permissions
Mar 29, 1999i was asked by a user this morning to create an ID for him and give the ID SELECT permissions to all tables in a database. This database has over 300 tables. The only way that I could see to do this is to use the Object Permissions dialog box and manually grant the SELECT permission to each table for this users. Is there a TSQL statement that will grant the Select permission to each table in a database? The only thing I found was to use the GRANT statement, but I would have to run it on each table. I would like to be able to run 1 statement that will assign SELECT permissions to each table in the database.
Thanks,
Philip Talavera
System Administrator
SVG Distribution
Granting Permissions In MS SQL
Jan 18, 2005Hi all,
I've got a MS SQL database and I created a user using this code:
EXEC sp_addlogin 'USERNAME','PASSWORD'
GO
USE DATABASE
GO
EXEC sp_revokedbaccess 'USERNAME'
EXEC sp_grantdbaccess 'USERNAME'
GO
But when I log into the database using the created user and try create a table, I get an permissions denied message.
Thanks in advance
Granting Permission
Oct 8, 2006Hi
I need to grant SELECT permission for ALL TABLES for tables which are tag to role (eg. ABC).
How do i grant them "permanently"? as the tables o/p by role (ABC) will be dropped and recreated when another users rerun the tables?
Appreciate any help.
Thanks very much!!
Granting SA-like Access Without SA
May 30, 2008Our databases are hosted on a shared server managed by our IT department. We do not have SA access to them. If we want to create or drop a database, we ask, they approve it and then give us permissions on it. It's a bit tedious, but we live with it. However, there are other features that we want.
Is it possible in SQL Server 2005 to gain certain priveleges that a SA has without being SA? Mainly, can we:
1. Be given priveleges to run the Tuning Advisor? We would love to be able to index our tables, but we are not sure what would be the most efficient approach, and the tuning advisor could help us with this.
2. Run the SQL Server Profiler. I see when I try to access it that you need SA or ALTER TRACE permissions - since you can see all the transactions going on in the database at a time. Can we limit it to only our transactions? Is this possible?
Or is it best to request our own instance? Is that a tedious request for an IT department? Thank you.
Granting Access Permissions
Nov 15, 2006Hi
I am using SQL Express2005 on my local machine. How do I grant access permissions to ASPNET in order to log onto a database? I have the SQL management studio installed to do this but I can't seem to find the option to grant permissions.
At the moment the access is granted to MYMACHINE_NAMEMY_USER_NAME.
I am using VS2003
Thanks
Granting Permissions On Set Of Tables
Jul 20, 2004I have 500 tables in my Db.In those some tables name starts with abc (abc_emp,abc_dept) and rest of the tables name start with xyz(xyz_emp,xyz_transactions).I wanted to give select,insert,update and delete permissions for an user on the tables which starts with abc.
How can i do that in a much easier and sophisticated way.
Thanks.
Granting Permission For A VIEW?
Mar 8, 2012I have an application, the front end is Access and the back end is sql server 2008 express.
The application does not display the view on a user's machine. Do I have to grant permission for the user, in order for the VIEW to display?
I have tried granting permission, but I am doing something wrong.
Granting Privileges With A Script
Sep 14, 2005Hi,
I'm trying to write a script to grant privileges to a user (we are trying to allow Windows Authentication in our application).
Previously, we used the following syntax:
grant select, insert, delete, update on area to mattuser
Where mattuser is a valid sql server user.
However, we want to do something like the following:
grant select, insert, delete, update on area to MATT2000IUSR_MATT2000
Where IUSR_MATT2000 is a valid user on computer MATT2000.
We get an error when we try to run this script as follows:
Incorrect syntax near ''
How do we grant permissions for this user, other than doing it manually?
Regards.
Matt.
Granting Permissions To Developers
Jun 18, 2007Hi Everyone,
Were looking from some feedback, thoughts, comments, suggestions on a permissions issue in our SQL Server 2005 environment. We have a Development (stand-alone server) and Production (activepassive cluster). Both running SP2. We're looking for the best way to manage permissions for the developers without giving them dbo privileges.
As background information, here's a note / response from a developer outlining the permission they need.
-----------------------------------------
"Our team needs enough permissions on DB database to:
Create and modify DB object such as tables, stored procedures, keys, triggers, views, ...
Be able to execute stored procedures and other basic DB objects
One of the issue I had when working on DatabaseA which was never resolved was that I could create tables, but had no rights to modify them once created.
I could modify them via scripts, but not via graphical interface which is a pain.
I think we should have full permissions to dev DB other than to drop DB, and modify system DB settings.
So that we can work within the created DB shell completely."
-----------------------------------------
Previous to supporting the current SQL Server 2005 environment, the developersapp owners had db_owner for their databases. Definitely not a best practice as with 2005 db_owner is ablke to delete databases. Moving away from this, we thought we would scale them back and only grant them the following database roles:
db_datareader
db_datawriter
db_ddladmin
With these roles, they were able to create the tables, views, stored procedures, etc...... but problems arose when they tried to modify the objects they created as well as execute stored procedures. It's going to be a pain to grant permissions on each stored procedure. More of a mystery is allowing them to make design changes within Studio Manager. Given they can already do this using scripts but not the GUI.
So there is an issue with using GUI tools to design the tables.
Here's a thread we found that tries to explain the reason why they can't use the GUI to make design changes.
Even if you have CREATE TABLE permission, there are limitations to the modifications you can make. Remember, as you modify an existing table or design a new one, your work can induce attendant modifications in other tables. For example, if you change the data type of a foreign-key column, the corresponding column in the primary-key table will be automatically modified by the Visual Database Tools. If you do not own the primary-key table, and you are not logged in as the system administrator, database owner, or a user that is a member of the db_owner role, your modification will fail.
When we created the accounts, we assigned the default schema to be 'dbo'. This was thought to simplify administration of the objects. In SQL Server 2000, this was a best practice. Now, in SQL Server 2005, they changed everything with the user schema separation.
So we have a developer (devuser) - created with default schema (dbo). Any object that are being created are owned by dbo. (ie... dbo.table1, dbo.storedproc1, etc..) So dbo owns the objects, not the user.
Does anyone have any ideas? Do we create a new schema and assign permissions? Do we create a new fixed database role for the developers? I'm curious as to how others are assigning permissions to developers on development and production servers.
Thanks,
Rob
Granting Permission To Folders
Feb 12, 2008Within my Report Manager, I have several folders, and I would like these folders to be only visible to certain users and groups. In the Active Directory I have DOMAINGroupName1. If I add this group to the folder I want them to have access to with a Browser role, when they open Report Manager they do not see the folder at all. Then I added the same group to the HOME folder also, but again they could not see their folder when they opened the Report Manager. If I add the Users of this group individually (DOMAINUser1, DOMAINUser2 etc) then they can see the folder and run reports just fine. This is not an ideal solution as groups will change over time and I don't want to have to keep adding and deleting members. Anyone got any ideas why they can't see their folder?
Thanks!
Granting Insert, Delete Permissions
Sep 15, 2000When granting INSERT, DELETE permissions, is this done for
the logon-id OR for the user associated with the logon-id?
I know you can do this for roles.
Granting Permission To Create View
Jul 20, 2005What is the best way to grant a user permission to create a view?I first created a role using enterprise manager but for the role Icreated it doesn't seem to offer that permission. It offers the basicstuff such as insert, select, and update.I could go in and use a grant create view sql statement I suppose butI'd rather do it through enterprise manager where it would be visibleif I need to change it in the future.-David
View 3 Replies View RelatedGranting Permissions Using SQL 2005 Schema...
Aug 15, 2007All,
I have been asked to grant a Windows group Full access to all tables under our Sandbox Schema. This will allow these users to do anything to the tables under this Schema.
I created the Windows Group (Sandbox Users), created the login in SQL, created the user in the database that is tied to the Windows group, then ran GRANT CONTROL ON SCHEMA::[Sandbox] TO [Sandbox Users].
I have verified that the users are in the Windows group, but they state that they still can not delete tables under the Sandbox Schema.
Anyone have any ideas?
Thanks,
Justin
Granting Access To Selected Tables
Nov 19, 2007
Hi,
I am using windows authentication to access SQL Server 2005 objects. I have created a database role which grants select permission to only 2 tables in the database. I have added the domain user to this role. So the user should be able to select data from only those tables but when i try to select data from other tables also it displays the data which shouldnt happen. Could you please let me know whether there is any specific setting that needs to be done? Also is there anything to do with the schema level permission setting?
Granting Stored Procedure Execute Permissions From ASP.NET?
Nov 21, 2005Bit of an emergency!
I do not have direct access to our SQL Server but I have full FTP access to the web server and have the db Username/passwords.
I need to grant execute permissions on a stored procedure, can I do this from an asp/ASP.NET page?
The DB guys take 24 hours to run a script against the database!
Any help would be greatfully recieved.
Rich
Granting Edit Permission On Stored Procedures
Jan 21, 2005I have a user on my database that has the following base permissions :
public
db_datareader
I need to give this user permission to edit a single stored procedure. I have tried using the following command :
GRANT ALL ON stored_procedure_name TO username
Which executes successfully, but the user still cannot edit the stored procedure.
If I give the user db_ddladmin permission they can edit all the user stored procedures, but for security reasons I would prefer to be able to this this at procedure level rather than a global permission on all user procs.
Does anybody know how I can do this?
EDIT : This is on SQL 2000
Granting Permission On Multiple Stored Procs
May 25, 2007Is there a better way of granting permission to a stored proc for a selected user other than (enterprise manager) select sp then accessing propertys then permissions, then user?
View 4 Replies View RelatedGranting Db_owner To The Windows Group In 2005
Feb 12, 2008When granting db_owner to the SINGLE user, it's automatically set the DEFAULT_SCHEMA to dbo so when the user created the table, the table will be owned by "dbo"
When granting db_owner to the Window group, DEFAULT SCHEMA WILL NOT be "dbo", for this reason when the user A(belonging to this Windows Group) created a table, that's table will be owned by user A instead of dbo.
1. is it normal behavior for the Windows group?
2. Is there any way you can grant to the group so the objects will be owned by dbo instead of the user who created the objects? or this is a behavior when MS introduce SCHEMA in 2005.
Thanks,