Grouping Using Two Stored Procedures
Jan 26, 2005
Hi,
I am creating a set of reports in Crystal showing emails sent and delivered from users within our organisation.
Each report uses a different stored procedure.
Report 1 shows emails sent:
Sender: Person in our org
Recipient: Person outside our org
Number: number of emails sent
Report 2 shows emails recived:
Sender: person outside our org
Recipient: Person in our org
Number: Number of emails received
In crystal, the reports are grouped around the sender for report 1, and the recipient for group 2 (therefore the reports are grouped around the person in our organisation).
Now I need to create a report showing the details of the two reports combined into one, but this creates a problem when i try to group. i need to distinguish between who is in our organisation and who is it, and then to group by them.
does anyone have any idea how this may be done?
i want the report to look like this:
Person in our organisation:
-----------------------------
Sent: bob@yahoo.co.uk 26
sally@hotmail.com 4
peter@msn.com 12
Subtotal: 42
Received: fred@company.co.uk 45
vicky@hotmail.com 10
Subtotal 55
Total 97
and so on for each person.
Many thanks if you can help
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Feb 25, 2008
In Oracle database we can group our stored procedures in packets. It is very useful when we are creating big business solutions with hundreds stored procedures. Can we do something like this in SQL server?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 22, 2007
Hi i have always used views in my code to group common functionality in my sql expressions and then i can simply call these views in my data access layer by saing:
SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand("SELECT * FROM vw_Documents WHERE CategoryID = @CategoryID", cn);
However my view has become so complicated that i had to convert it to a stored procedure called sp_Documents. The problem now though is that is that i wish to do queries against the data returned but i can't simply say:
SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand("SELECT * FROM sp_Documents WHERE CategoryID = @CategoryID", cn);
The only way i can see to do it is to create a stored procedure for every single senario i have passing in the appropriate values as parameters. This seems a pretty messy solution to me because i would have repeated logic in all my stored procedures. Therefore i was wondering if there's a simpler way for me to do this or am i just being lazy :).
Appreciate if someone could help,
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
I want to know the differences between SQL Server 2000 storedprocedures and oracle stored procedures? Do they have differentsyntax? The concept should be the same that the stored proceduresexecute in the database server with better performance?Please advise good references for Oracle stored procedures also.thanks!!
View 11 Replies
View Related
Sep 30, 2006
Hi,
This Might be a really simple thing, however we have just installed SQL server 2005 on a new server, and are having difficulties with the set up of the Store Procedures. Every time we try to modify an existing stored procedure it attempts to save it as an SQL file, unlike in 2000 where it saved it as part of the database itself.
Thank you in advance for any help on this matter
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 6, 2007
Using SQL 2005, SP2. All of a sudden, whenever I create any stored procedures in the master database, they get created as system stored procedures. Doesn't matter what I name them, and what they do.
For example, even this simple little guy:
CREATE PROCEDURE BOB
AS
PRINT 'BOB'
GO
Gets created as a system stored procedure.
Any ideas what would cause that and/or how to fix it?
Thanks,
Jason
View 16 Replies
View Related
Mar 14, 2007
Hi all,
I am using the below statement to get some dates grouped by date, in my SP.
SELECT TOP 100 PERCENT COUNT(dbo.test.CallDate) AS CallCount, year(dbo.test.CallDate) AS CallYear, datepart(wk, dbo.test.CallDate) AS [Week] FROM dbo.test LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.view1 ON dbo.test.CallID = dbo.view1.CallID LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.view2 ON dbo.test.CallID = dbo.view2.CallID WHERE (dbo.view1.[ACCOUNT ID] = @accountid OR (dbo.view2.[ACCOUNT ID] = @accountid AND (convert(varchar(10),dbo.test.CallDate,121) BETWEEN CONVERT(DATETIME, @StartDate, 102)AND CONVERT(DATETIME, @EndDate, 102)) GROUP BY year(dbo.test.CallDate), datepart(wk, dbo.test.CallDate) ORDER BY year(dbo.test.CallDate), datepart(wk, dbo.test.CallDate) i gave startdate as 1/1/2007 and endDate as 2/18/2007 i am getting the reuslt as count year week 42 2001 32 2 2001 39 1 2001 51 1 2002 17 1 2002 19 106 2002 21 183 2002 22 226 2002 23 ................................. ................................... 1208 2007 1 1292 2007 2 actually i should get only the last 2 rows. Can anyone please point out, why i am getting the 2001, 2002 data? and how to fix that?Thanks
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 15, 2007
I'm having some difficulty getting the appropriate results for my scenerio. I have two different datasets that I'm using. One is consisting of two joined tables and the other consisting of one sp. The sp's parameters rely on two things- one is the companyNum (inputed when the user runs the report) and two is the ContactNumType. The ContactTypeNum comes from the dataset of tables. I need to have a table consisting of this format:
ContactNumType1 (From the Tables)
File_Name1 (From the sp)
File_Name4 (From the sp)
File_Name3 (From the sp)
ContactNumType2 (From the Tables)
File_Name2 (From the sp)
File_Name7(From the sp)
ContactNumType3 (From the Tables)
File_Name5 (From the sp)
ContactNumType4 (From the Tables)
File_Name6 (From the sp)
File_Name10 (From the sp)
File_Name8(From the sp)
File_Name9 (From the sp)
So essentially what is going on is that every returned File_Name is grouped based upon the type of ContactNumType. My table returns the appropriate ContactNumTypes and the appropriate number of File_Names but returns only the first File_Name for each row. The File_Names should only grouped by the ContactTypeNums and each be unique. Is there any way to do that?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Edited: I still am trying to work this out. I've tried a few run-arounds but none have worked. Adding custom code apparently is too risky at this point because of the security precautions that I've been instructed to take. Any help would be greatly appreciated as this project has been going on for days now....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 29, 2008
How do I search for and print all stored procedure names in a particular database? I can use the following query to search and print out all table names in a database. I just need to figure out how to modify the code below to search for stored procedure names. Can anyone help me out?
SELECT TABLE_SCHEMA + '.' + TABLE_NAME
FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES
WHERE TABLE_TYPE = 'BASE TABLE'
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 13, 2007
Seems like I'm stealing all the threads here, : But I need to learn :) I have a StoredProcedure that needs to return values that other StoredProcedures return.Rather than have my DataAccess layer access the DB multiple times, I would like to call One stored Procedure, and have that stored procedure call the others to get the information I need. I think this way would be more efficient than accessing the DB multiple times. One of my SP is:SELECT I.ItemDetailID, I.ItemDetailStatusID, I.ItemDetailTypeID, I.Archived, I.Expired, I.ExpireDate, I.Deleted, S.Name AS 'StatusName', S.ItemDetailStatusID, S.InProgress as 'StatusInProgress', S.Color AS 'StatusColor',T.[Name] AS 'TypeName', T.Prefix, T.Name AS 'ItemDetailTypeName', T.ItemDetailTypeID FROM [Item].ItemDetails I INNER JOIN Item.ItemDetailStatus S ON I.ItemDetailStatusID = S.ItemDetailStatusID INNER JOIN [Item].ItemDetailTypes T ON I.ItemDetailTypeID = T.ItemDetailTypeID However, I already have StoredProcedures that return the exact same data from the ItemDetailStatus table and ItemDetailTypes table.Would it be better to do it above, and have more code to change when a new column/field is added, or more checks, or do something like:(This is not propper SQL) SELECT I.ItemDetailID, I.ItemDetailStatusID, I.ItemDetailTypeID, I.Archived, I.Expired, I.ExpireDate, I.Deleted, EXEC [Item].ItemDetailStatusInfo I.ItemDetailStatusID, EXEC [Item].ItemDetailTypeInfo I.ItemDetailTypeID FROM [Item].ItemDetails IOr something like that... Any thoughts?
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 13, 2008
Greetings:
I have MSSQL 2005. On earlier versions of MSSQL saving a stored procedure wasn't a confusing action. However, every time I try to save my completed stored procedure (parsed successfully ) I'm prompted to save it as a query on the hard drive.
How do I cause the 'Save' action to add the new stored procedure to my database's list of stored procedures?
Thanks!
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2006
We recently upgraded to SQL Server 2005. We had several stored procedures in the master database and, rather than completely rewriting a lot of code, we just recreated these stored procedures in the new master database.
For some reason, some of these stored procedures are getting stored as "System Stored Procedures" rather than just as "Stored Procedures". Queries to sys.Objects and sys.Procedures shows that these procs are being saved with the is_ms_shipped field set to 1, even though they obviously were not shipped with the product.
I can't update the sys.Objects or sys.Procedures views in 2005.
What effect will this flag (is_ms_shipped = 1) have on my stored procedures?
Can I move these out of "System Stored Procedures" and into "Stored Procedures"?
Thanks!
View 24 Replies
View Related
Apr 23, 2008
Hello friends......How are you ? I want to ask you all that how can I do the following ?
I want to now that how many ways are there to do this ?
How can I call one or more stored procedures into perticular one Stored Proc ? in MS SQL Server 2000/05.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 26, 2008
Hello
I'm start to work with SSIS.
We have a lot (many hundreds) of old (SQL Server2000) procedures on SQL 2005.
Most of the Stored Procedures ends with the following commands:
SET @SQLSTRING = 'SELECT * INTO ' + @OutputTableName + ' FROM #RESULTTABLE'
EXEC @RETVAL = sp_executeSQL @SQLSTRING
How can I use SSIS to move the complete #RESULTTABLE to Excel or to a Flat File? (e.g. as a *.csv -File)
I found a way but I think i'ts only a workaround:
1. Write the #Resulttable to DB (changed Prozedure)
2. create data flow task (ole DB Source - Data Conversion - Excel Destination)
Does anyone know a better way to transfer the #RESULTTABLE to Excel or Flat file?
Thanks for an early Answer
Chaepp
View 9 Replies
View Related
Nov 26, 2007
I'm really stumped on this one. I'm a self taught SQL guy, so there is probobly something I'm overlooking.
I'm trying to get information like this in to a report:
WO#
-WO Line #
--(Details)
--Work Order Line Detail #1
--Work Order Line Detail #2
--Work Order Line Detail #3
--Work Order Line Detail #etc
--(Parts)
--Work Order Line Parts #1
--Work Order Line Parts #2
--Work Order Line Detail #etc
WO#
-WO Line #
--(Details)
--Work Order Line Detail #1
--Work Order Line Detail #2
--Work Order Line Detail #3
--Work Order Line Detail #etc
--(Parts)
--Work Order Line Parts #1
--Work Order Line Parts #2
--Work Order Line Parts #etc
I'm unable to get the grouping right on this. Since the line details and line parts both are children of the line #, how do you do "parallel groups"?
There are 4 tables:
Work Order Header
Work Order Line
Work Order Line Details
Work Order Line Requisitions
The Header has a unique PK.
The Line uses the Header and a Line # as foreign keys that together are unique.
The Detail and requisition tables use the header and line #'s in addition to their own line number foreign keys. My queries ends up looking like this:
WO WOL WOLR WOLD
226952 10000 10000 10000
226952 10000 10000 20000
226952 10000 10000 30000
226952 10000 10000 40000
226952 10000 20000 10000
226952 10000 20000 20000
226952 10000 20000 30000
226952 10000 20000 40000
399999 10000 NULL 10000
375654 10000 10000 NULL
etc
Hierarchy:
WO > WOL > WOLD
WO > WOL > WOLR
It probobly isn't best practice, but I'm kinda new so I need some guidance. I'd really appreciate any help! Here's my query:
SELECT [Work Order Header].No_ AS WO_No, [Work Order Line].[Line No_] AS WOL_No,
[Work Order Requisition].[Line No_] AS WOLR_No, [Work Order Line Detail].[Line No_] AS WOLD_No
FROM [Work Order Header] LEFT OUTER JOIN
[Work Order Line] ON [Work Order Header].No_ = [Work Order Line].[Work Order No_] LEFT OUTER JOIN
[Work Order Line Detail] ON [Work Order Line].[Work Order No_] = [Work Order Line Detail].[Work Order No_] AND
[Work Order Line].[Line No_] = [Work Order Line Detail].[Work Order Line No_] LEFT OUTER JOIN
[Work Order Requisition] ON [Work Order Line].[Work Order No_] = [Work Order Requisition].[Work Order No_] AND
[Work Order Line].[Line No_] = [Work Order Requisition].[Work Order Line No_]
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 16, 2007
Hi,
Do you know how to write stored procedures inside another stored procedure in MS SQL.
Create procedure spMyProc inputData varchar(50)
AS
----- some logical
procedure spMyProc inputInsideData varchar(10)
AS
--- some logical
--- go
-------
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 8, 2008
I am writing a set of store procedures (around 30), most of them require the same basic logic to get an ID, I was thinking to add this logic into an stored procedure.
The question is: Would calling an stored procedure from within an stored procedure affect performance? I mean, would it need to create a separate db connection? am I better off copying and pasting the logic into all the store procedures (in terms of performance)?
Thanks in advance
John
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 1, 2007
Hi all - I'm trying to optimized my stored procedures to be a bit easier to maintain, and am sure this is possible, not am very unclear on the syntax to doing this correctly. For example, I have a simple stored procedure that takes a string as a parameter, and returns its resolved index that corresponds to a record in my database. ie
exec dbo.DeriveStatusID 'Created'
returns an int value as 1
(performed by "SELECT statusID FROM statusList WHERE statusName= 'Created')
but I also have a second stored procedure that needs to make reference to this procedure first, in order to resolve an id - ie:
exec dbo.AddProduct_Insert 'widget1'
which currently performs:SET @statusID = (SELECT statusID FROM statusList WHERE statusName='Created')INSERT INTO Products (productname, statusID) VALUES (''widget1', @statusID)
I want to simply the insert to perform (in one sproc):
SET @statusID = EXEC deriveStatusID ('Created')INSERT INTO Products (productname, statusID) VALUES (''widget1', @statusID)
This works fine if I call this stored procedure in code first, then pass it to the second stored procedure, but NOT if it is reference in the second stored procedure directly (I end up with an empty value for @statusID in this example).
My actual "Insert" stored procedures are far more complicated, but I am working towards lightening the business logic in my application ( it shouldn't have to pre-vet the data prior to executing a valid insert).
Hopefully this makes some sense - it doesn't seem right to me that this is impossible, and am fairly sure I'm just missing some simple syntax - can anyone assist?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 15, 2008
i have created the folowing function but keep geting an error.
Only functions and extended stored procedures can be executed from within a function.
Why am i getting this error!
Create Function myDateAdd
(@buildd nvarchar(4), @avdate as nvarchar(25))
Returns nvarchar(25)
as
Begin
declare @ret nvarchar(25)
declare @sqlval as nvarchar(3000)
set @sqlval = 'select ''@ret'' = max(realday) from (
select top '+ @buildd +' realday from v_caltable where realday >= '''+ @avdate +''' and prod = 1 )a'
execute sp_executesql @sqlval
return @ret
end
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 17, 2006
hi
i need to use only one stored procedure and access many tablesso how write a stored procedure for that dohelp me looking forward for a reply to the earliest i am developing web page using asp.net using c# and sqlserver as backend
looking forward for a replygayathri
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 15, 2006
I am interested to know about stored procedures in Mssql .Can anyone please help me out.
Thanx in advance.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 24, 2007
Hello I have two stored procedures
@ID INT
AS
SELECT (CASE WHEN NUM >= 10 THEN CAST(PAID AS FLOAT) / CAST(NUM AS FLOAT) * 100 WHEN NUM < 10 THEN 0 END) AS PER
FROM (SELECT (SELECT COUNT(*) AS Expr1
FROM Event_data AS D LEFT OUTER JOIN
Events AS E ON E.id = D.Event_id
WHERE (D.Transaction_type = 1) AND (D.Player_id = @ID)) AS NUM,
(SELECT COUNT(*) AS Expr1
FROM Event_data AS D LEFT OUTER JOIN
Events AS E ON E.id = D.Event_id
WHERE (D.Transaction_type = 1) AND (D.Transaction_value > 0) AND (D.Player_id = @ID)) AS PAID) AS X
and
@ID INT
AS
SELECT P.*,'/' + DBO.GETCHIPFOLDER(@ID) + '/' + ISNULL(P.PHOTO,'BLANK.GIF') AS PIC,ISNULL(
(SELECT SUM(TRANSACTION_VALUE)
FROM EVENT_DATA WHERE PLAYER_ID=@ID AND TRANSACTION_TYPE=1
GROUP BY PLAYER_ID),0) AS WINNINGS FROM PLAYERS P
undefined P
The first returns a percentage for player wins, the second gives me a photo and sums the player winnings
I would like to combine the results so I can get the percentage and wininngs in one query, in another matter all together I would like create a procedure like the first but instead of returning only one player, I would like to return the percentage for each player
Thanks in advance for any light you can shine on this.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 25, 2007
I have a question about stored procedures, Is it better to use stored procedures even if I only use it once at my site? Or is it better to write the sql-part directly in the sqldatasource?
And am I forced to create two different stored procedures even if they are exactly the same except the "Where-part"?
Now I have around 40 stored procedures, and quite many of them looks the same except the where-part...
(Iam just a beginner with SQL)
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 2, 2007
Hello every one,
I m working in aspx 2.0 with sql server 2005, please tell me how can I create Stored Procedures for two or more tables not a single table(select,insert,update,delete please send me the queries which can help me in easy way I will very thankful to you
Thank you
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 19, 2007
I am learning to make a ASP web site and feel that if i can do it the harder way using some stored procedures instead of using multiple datasources on each page requiring that it might be better. So i am wondering what are these used for:DECLARE vs just entering "@param1 varchar(30)"When i use "DECLARE @rc int" i get the error "Incorrect syntax near DECLARE"How to return values to ASP page in Visual Studio 2005 How to use @@rowcount - doesn't seem to work for me?i tried using DECLARE @rc intSET @rc = @@rowcountWhen to use GO, BEGIN etcIf i want to use the variable only in the procedure, and not needed to be inputed, do i need to put it in the CREATE PROCEDURE (section)?Should i use my own stored procedures or VS2005 created ones using datasources? not really procedures but SQL, in SQL can i do like IF ELSE? if i use my own i cant use the Optimistic Concurrency right? and whats that?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 5, 2007
Is there a website or somewhere i can go to read up on stored procedures??
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 2, 2007
cREATE PROCEDURE emp @val varchar(50)AS
declare @test varchar(50)declare @a varchar(50)set @a= @val + '_a'set @test = 'alter table dbo.rights_user add ' + @a + ' varchar(50) null'
execute(@test)
GO
this is my procedure...anyth wrong here...i can able to execute procedure only with 3 char..egexec emp 'na'exec emp 'hr10'--->wen i try like this cannot..showing datataype mis match
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 18, 2007
Hi,
Can anyone help me. I've created a stored procedure in sql server and I'm trying to run it from my asp.net page. On Database Explorer I can't see it, or any for that matter, however I can see tables in the same schema.
Also I can't see it when I build a table adapter either.
Can anybody help?
Thanks
Sam
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 22, 2007
Hi,how can I use stored procedures in asp.net. The stored procedure itselve is defined on the sqlserver and works fine.Actual I found out that in my asp.net 2-surrounding there can be the adofunction disabled.I tried to use it with dimension of a new SqlConnection but I'm woundering why within a visual basic part I don't get the codecompletion whenI use the dimensioned object combined with commands.Regards,Ruprecht Helms
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 8, 2008
Hi,I have a procedure that insert some values into database. The point is, when somebody doesn't fill up a certain field on the form, I don't want the procedure to insert an empty row into database. The procedure looks like this:@tresc text, @id_test int, @odp text, @correct bit, @odp1 text, @correct1 bit, @odp2 text, @correct2 bit, @odp3 text, @correct3 bit, @odp4 text, @correct4 bit, @odp5 text, @correct5 bit, @odp6 text, @correct6 bit, @odp7 text, @correct7 bit ASDeclare @id_utworzonego_pytania intBeginSet nocount on Insert into Pytanie (tresc,id_test) values ( @tresc,@id_test) select @id_utworzonego_pytania=@@IDENTITY if(@odp is not null) BEGIN Insert into Odpowiedz (odp,correct,id_pytania) Values (@odp,@correct,@id_utworzonego_pytania) END Insert into Odpowiedz (odp,correct,id_pytania) Values (@odp1,@correct1,@id_utworzonego_pytania) Insert into Odpowiedz (odp,correct,id_pytania) Values (@odp2,@correct2,@id_utworzonego_pytania) Insert into Odpowiedz (odp,correct,id_pytania) Values (@odp3,@correct3,@id_utworzonego_pytania) Insert into Odpowiedz (odp,correct,id_pytania) Values (@odp4,@correct4,@id_utworzonego_pytania) Insert into Odpowiedz (odp,correct,id_pytania) Values (@odp5,@correct5,@id_utworzonego_pytania) Insert into Odpowiedz (odp,correct,id_pytania) Values (@odp6,@correct6,@id_utworzonego_pytania) Insert into Odpowiedz (odp,correct,id_pytania) Values (@odp7,@correct7,@id_utworzonego_pytania) SET NOCOUNT OFF END And the code:con = new SqlConnection("Data Source=ELF;Initial Catalog=logos;Integrated Security=True"); SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand("StoredProcedure2", con); cmd.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure; cmd.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@tresc", TextBox1.Text)); cmd.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@id_test", id)); cmd.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@odp", TextBox10.Text)); cmd.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@correct", RadioButtonList2.SelectedValue)); cmd.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@odp1", TextBox2.Text)); cmd.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@correct1", RadioButtonList1.SelectedValue)); cmd.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@odp2", TextBox3.Text)); cmd.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@correct2", RadioButtonList3.SelectedValue)); cmd.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@odp3", TextBox4.Text)); cmd.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@correct3", RadioButtonList4.SelectedValue)); cmd.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@odp4", TextBox5.Text)); cmd.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@correct4", RadioButtonList5.SelectedValue)); cmd.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@odp5", TextBox6.Text)); cmd.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@correct5", RadioButtonList6.SelectedValue)); cmd.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@odp6", TextBox7.Text)); cmd.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@correct6", RadioButtonList7.SelectedValue)); cmd.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@odp7", TextBox8.Text)); cmd.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@correct7", RadioButtonList8.SelectedValue)); con.Open(); cmd.ExecuteNonQuery(); con.Close();It works perfectly if someone fill all the textboxes; but it is not required. So when you leave an empty textbox, the procedure inserts an empty row into database. Please, help!Regards,N.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jan 10, 2008
Just a question or 2: Would it be faster in your opinion to attempt to insert a user into a database and should a database user already exist and an exception is caught for duplicate key existing... warn the user that it already exists in the database or rather by using a stored procedure to check. ( I'm trying to remove as much redundancy in code as possible)Now for another instance... I need to create either 3 procedures, 1st to check if a user exists with relevant data... the 2nd to update if there is already data, 3rd to insert should it be null. Or should i just use a single procedure that Checks if the user exists, if the @@rowcount = 1 then update else insert. ( all in 1 compact procedure) Id like to hear some peoples opinions in this matter as everyone seems to have different ways of doing things, I would just like to know whats best.
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 30, 2008
hi to all,
i am using asp .net 2.0 and SQL Server 2005.
i want to use STORED PROCEDURES in my web application.
any links or code helps me a lot.
thanks in advance.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 1, 2004
I have a question on stored procedures in visual studio.net. When I right click on the stored procedure node in the server explorer the only options I get are Refresh and Properties. These are also the only options I get when I right click on Tables or Views. I can’t figure out why I can’t create a new table, view or stored procedure. I believe I have the right permissions set but I can’t figure out why I get no other options. All the help I find on creating stored procedures say to make sure that sql server debugging is enabled for the programs (which it is) and then to right click on stored procedure and select the new stored procedures option from the pop-up window. I do not get this option.
View 6 Replies
View Related