HOw Can I Alter Databases To Change Log Size To Unlimited?
Feb 17, 2008 We have 300+ databases on one sinlge server. If I need to change log size to "unlimited" for all of them, is there any way to do so? Please advice.
-Julie
We have 300+ databases on one sinlge server. If I need to change log size to "unlimited" for all of them, is there any way to do so? Please advice.
-Julie
Hi All,
Database size is not increasing automatically ,however I have set it as unlimited growth. Any idea about this ?
thanks for in advance,
Sedat Duztas
Probil
I need to be able to change a table column name from within my C# code. The system in this part of the application is intended to be highly configurable and column names on the table being operated upon can change. The code adds square brackets to the column name (because the user might set up a column name with one or more spaces) but I'm not sure if I'm doing it right because I'm getting an error.
The code that builds the SQL command is:SqlCommand = new SqlCommand("ALTER TABLE wto_facilities CHANGE [" +
oldAccomType + "][" + accomType.Text + "] varchar(20)", conn); On the first test run, the code produces the following: ALTER TABLE wto_facilities CHANGE [Hotel] [Hotels] varchar(20)However, it's giving me the following error: Incorrect syntax near 'Hotels'It looks fine to me, but it's obviously not.
Hi there,
I recently saw that the transaction log files of user dbs grow undefinitely in SQL Server 2000 - one of our customers had a 11 GB log file which totally slowed down the server.
Another customer of ours uses one of my applications logging all actions in a MSDE database file and I fear that the corresponding transaction log file will grow and block the system too - is there any way that I could shrink and set the max size of the transaction log file through SQL?
I already know the command "SHRINK FILE ('filename')" but I haven't found a SQL command to set the max size.
Thank you for any hints!
Sascha
I have the next question, and i would like to hear what do you thinkabout, and if is there a better solution for "my problem"here is the question, I have a huge table with 60GB of data (imagefiles). The problem happen always when i try to ALTER the structure ofthe table. For example I change a field char(3) to char(4)...thesqlserver then performs the "alter table" command...that must besomething similar than "insert into the new table + drop the actualtable" and for that I need about 60GB o space for my LOG file, andtakes hours to complete the operation.Is this the only way to alter a single field in my table??I would like to heard you opinions...Thanks..ALberto
View 2 Replies View Related
I am modifying a table and some of the columns are changing. The following syntax is resulting in errors. What am I doing wrong?
ALTER TABLE [EDB].[SQL_test]
ALTER COLUMN EDBR_Nb EDBR_Nm varchar(10)
Please Help!!
We have an application using SQLOLEDB connection to a SQL Server 2005 database. Per domain policy, the users are required to change their password every 60 days.
The accounts are established to 'Enforce password policy'.
When we try to execute the 'ALTER LOGIN' command to change the password, locks are being established and will not free the account without bouncing the instance.
After issuing the command, any interaction with the server using this UserID results in a "lock request time out" error 1222.
I have tried issuing this command using both the application and through SQLServer Mgmt Studio Express and the results are the same.
Any idea would be greatly appreciated.
Rusty Rickmon
Does securityadmin Server level role can add, alter logins and corresponding users on all databases ?
If not what is the best role other thn SA to have to manager logins and users.
I want to list my databases, and physical related files, and their size but the following commands do not provide the size. Any idea?
SELECT * FROM sysdatabases
SELECT * FROM sys.sysfiles
I know it's silly question
Canada DBA
Hello,I have been trying to figure out how to temporarily change the maxfilegroup size of a SQL 2000 database I "inherited" when our DBA quit.I just need some breathing room until I can figure out how to properlyarchive and remove some filegroups.Here is the scenario, my filegroup is set to 20. Each filegroup is setto grow to 4096.I currently have all 20 filegroups in use and filegroup number 20 ismore than 1/2 full.I have considered making the max size for each filegroup larger butbelieve this is treating the symptom not fixing the problem.I would RTFM if I knew how to ask the question in 5 words or less.I have plenty of room to grow in terms of disk space.In Query Analyzer I suspect I have to use an ALTER DATABASEIn Gui mode I suspect I have to right click on the database properties,filegoups,,,,In the past I have setup my databases with 1 filegroup and autoconfigured to grow as needed so this is new territory for me so pleasefeel free to dumb it down for a noob as I need baby steps.
View 2 Replies View RelatedHi
I am using one Publisher with many subscribers for Merge replication of a database.
I wanted to change size one column in a table. So I added a dummy column (through Filter column).
Copied data, dropped old column (through Filter column), added new column, copied data, and dropped dummy column.
On subscriber A, replication is OK. On subscriber B, I get the following message.
--------------------
Initializing
Connecting to Publisher 'REPLIC'
Retrieving publication information
Retrieving subscription information
A column was added to or dropped from the replicated table.
The schema script 'exec sp_repladdcolumn '[dbo].[Items]','C1',[NVARCHAR(1000) NULL], '%', 1' could not be propagated to the subscriber.
The schema script 'exec sp_repladdcolumn '[dbo].[Items]','C1',[NVARCHAR(1000) NULL], '%', 1' could not be propagated to the subscriber.
A column was added to or dropped from the replicated table.
--------------------
I made a new snapshot, reintialized subscription with upload, and tried to sychronize again.
But same message.
Question 1. Is there anyway to make replication?
Question 2. If not, can I at least upload data changes before dropping and making new publication?
Imtaar
Hello,I am starting to examine using SQLServer instead of Oracle. I wentthrough the SQLServer import utility to copy tables from Oracle intoSQLServer. I then checked the size of the database.I then started to specify indices for the tables. I did not see thedatabase file size grow all that much. I kept on using the shrinkcommand to make sure that wasted space was removed. I even made surethat minimal free space was allowed.I was rather expecting (from experience with Oracle) that there wouldbe a large growth in the database when addind indices. So what did Imiss? Are the indices stored elsewhere and I missed them? DoesSQLServer handle indices differently so they dont' bloat the databasesize?The size of our data in SQLServer is a key factor in whether we movefrom Oracle, so I need to under how indices effect storage size.Thanks for any help.Bart TorbertJoin Bytes!
View 7 Replies View RelatedHi All,
View 4 Replies View RelatedHi, all experts here,
Thanks a lot for your kind attention.
I am on the layout page, and click on the body, going to the body property dialogue, there is a size property there, I changed its width and height, but it is not changed at all? I mean once I save it, it is back to its orginal size? Why is that? Any advices for that?
Hope my question is clear.
Thanks a lot in advance for your help.
And I am looking forward to hearing from you shortly.
With best regards,
Yours sincerely,
Can anyone please tell me of a way of generating a list of all user databases and their size with one command or view?
Thanks,
Hi all,
I tried to change the size of a field of my table using the query :-
ALTER TABLE test MODIFY id varchar(50)
Initially the size of id was set to 30 .Is there any other way or any error in my query.Please help me soon.
joshymraj
Howdy!Does any of you good folk know how to change window size of the DTSImport/Export Wizard window?Darn thing is very small and inconvinient to work with, no apparent way tochange it's size,may be there is a registry tweak or something.Thanks in advance,I.B.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHas anyone implemented split data for an application between two databases because the data size is extremely large? If so could you please point me to relevant information.In this split data scenario, a table will automatically carry over to another database whenever the size limit for the current database is reached. The challenge is here for the DAL (data access layer) to automatically look into the appropriate database when the next row of data is in another database. OR Perhaps there is another solution to this terasize data problem..Any help on this would be greatly appreciated.
View 8 Replies View RelatedI have used the following script to add the size of chosen tables in all the databases on a given server. What I need to do is to create a GRAND total. Can someone give me a hint?
exec sp_msforeachdb
@Command1 = "print'?'",
@Command2 = "use ?
SELECT CAST (o.name as char(20)) as 'Table', SUM(c.length) 'Record size',
MAX (i.rows) '#of rows',
CONVERT (decimal (10, 4), SUM (c.length * i.rows)/(1024.00 * 1024.00)) 'Approx. size (MB)'
FROM sysobjects o, syscolumns c, sysindexes i
WHERE o.id = c.id
AND o.id = i.id
AND (i.indid = 1 or i.indid = 0)
AND o.type = 'U'
And o.name in ('Table1','Table2','Table3')
GROUP BY o.name
COMPUTE SUM (CONVERT (decimal (10,4), SUM (c.length * i.rows)/(1024.00 * 1024.00)))"
Thank you
I need a script that will return the mdf & ldf for multiple databases.
I am currently running...
sp_helpdb 'TestDataname'
...and copying the size of the mdf and ldf into an excel spreadsheet.
How can I get the mdf AND ldf file size for all of the databases in an instance? I need the MDF and LDF seperated and I want the actual size of the file as it appears on the file system.
Dear All,
I am facing one problem when I am trying to create some stored procedures,
Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Procedure SG_GET_USER_SECTOR_POSITION, Line 11
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Arabic_CI_AS" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.
Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Procedure SG_GETRANKLIST, Line 4
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Arabic_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.
I need to change these collation settings, please help me how to change them.
thanks & regards,
Shahbaz.
I have a database I need to copy from a Prod server to a Dev server. There is not enough space on the Dev server. In looking at the size of the files on the Prod server, the Initial Size property for the transaction log on the Prod server is set to 100,000 MB though the log is using nowhere near that.
This is a mirrored database so the recovery model is "full". I know that to change the initial log size, I have to put the database in 'simple" recovery model. Is this possible? Can I just:
1. Pause the mirror
2. Switch recovery model to simple
3. Change the initial size property to something smaller.
4. Shrink the transaction log
5. Change the recovery model back to full and resume the mirror?
I honestly don't know if the transaction log is needed on the Dev server. Meaning I may just be able to restore the transaction log to a different location on the server and delete it so that new one is created.
I have H Drive with 12 GB size.
The Transaction log file of my Database is given in H drive.
i.e H:Krishna_log.LDF.
My database initial setting for the Krishna_log.LDF is 10 GB.
so currently I can see 10 gb file occupied in the H Drive.
very soon my database Krishna_log.LDF is going to increase 10%.
Even though If do Backup/Shrink, it will reduce to the initial to 10 GB.
So all I need is, change the initial size of the
Krishna_log.LDF from 10 GB to 5 GB.
Pls give your suggetions...(I dont mind to shutdown,Restart the Sql server do these changes to achive this Task).
Thanx in advance.
Regards,
Krishna
I have a report that has a matrix. That matrix can have from 2 to 16 columns dependinging on the dataset result. Right now I am forced to place this matrix on the left side of the report and make a column layout pretty narrow. When dataset has more than 13 or so columns it looks OK, but when dataset has only two or three columns it looks weird with a matrix sitting in the left corner with two or three narrow columns and a lot of empty space to the right.
Is it possible programmatically change the width of the columns depending on their number in the dataset?
Is it possible to move the location of the matrix (horizontally) depending on the number of columns in the dataset?
Thank you,
Simon.
Is there a way to move my mdf and ldf files for the tempdb and the model databases? If yes, how? I tried ti detach but SQL Server will not let me.
View 1 Replies View Related
Hi,
I am working on a script to do following:
get a list of indexes on all tables in all dbs on a SQL server.
If the index property to allow page locks is off, then turn it on, re-index and turn it off again.
My problem is:
i want to use ' Use <db>' statement in the middle of my script but it is not working.I tried using dynamic SQL with
set @cmd='use '+ @dbname
exec (@cmd)
But this is not working.
Can we use 'use' statement in the middle of a script? If not what is the alternative?
My script looks as follows:
DECLARE @Database VARCHAR(255)
DECLARE @Table VARCHAR(255)
declare @Index varchar(255)
DECLARE @cmd NVARCHAR(500)
DECLARE @fillfactor INT
SET @fillfactor = 90
DECLARE DatabaseCursor CURSOR FOR
SELECT name FROM master.dbo.sysdatabases
WHERE name NOT IN ('master','model','msdb','tempdb','distrbution')
ORDER BY 1
OPEN DatabaseCursor
FETCH NEXT FROM DatabaseCursor INTO @Database
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
SET @cmd = 'DECLARE TableCursor CURSOR FOR SELECT table_catalog + ''.'' + table_schema + ''.'' + table_name as tableName
FROM ' + @Database + '.INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES WHERE table_type = ''BASE TABLE'''
-- create table cursor
EXEC (@cmd)
OPEN TableCursor
FETCH NEXT FROM TableCursor INTO @Table
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
set @cmd='use '+@Database
print (@cmd)
exec (@cmd)
declare IndexCursor CURSOR for select name from sys.indexes where object_id=object_id(@Table)
open IndexCursor
fetch next from IndexCursor into @Index
print (@table)
--select name from sys.indexes where object_id=object_id(@Table)
print (@index)
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
begin
if (INDEXPROPERTY(OBJECT_ID(@Table),@Index,'IsPageLockDisallowed')=1)
begin
print (@Index + ' page locking off')
-- SET @cmd='ALTER INDEX '+@Index +' ON '+@Table+' SET (ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) reorganize
-- ALTER INDEX '+@Index +' ON '+@Table+' SET (ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = OFF)'
end
else
begin
print (@Index + ' page locking on')
-- SET @cmd='ALTER INDEX '+@Index +' ON '+@Table+' reorganize'
end
--PRINT (@cmd)
fetch next from IndexCursor into @Index
end
CLOSE IndexCursor
DEALLOCATE IndexCursor
FETCH NEXT FROM TableCursor INTO @Table
END
CLOSE TableCursor
DEALLOCATE TableCursor
FETCH NEXT FROM DatabaseCursor INTO @Database
END
CLOSE DatabaseCursor
DEALLOCATE DatabaseCursor
Can anyone help me please?
Keep in mind this is my first compiled SQL program Stored Procedure(SP), copied from a book by Frasier Visual C++.NET in Visual Studio2005 (Chap12). So far, so theory, except for one bug (feature?)below. At some point I'm sure I'll be able to laugh about this, akinto forgeting a semi-colon in C/C++, but right now it's frustrating(time to sleep on it for a while).Problem--For some reason I get the error when trying to save files where twotables (called Author and Content), linked by a single key, form arelationship.By simple comparison of the source code in the textbook and my program(below) I found the difference: instead of, like in the textbook, theStored Procedure (SP) starting with "CREATE PROCEDURE", it*automatically* is (was somehow) given the name of 'ALTER PROCEDURE'and I cannot change this to "CREATE PROCEDURE" (you get an error in MSVisual Studio 2005 Pro edition of "There is already an object namedXXX in the database", see *|* below). No matter what I do, the SP isalways changed by Visual Studio 2005 to 'ALTER PROCEDURE'!!!(otherwise it simply will not save)Anybody else have this happen? (See below, others have had this happenover the years but it's not clear what the workaround is)Keep in mind this is my first attempt and I have ordered somespecialized books on SQL, but if this is a common problem (and Isuspect it's some sort of bug or quirk in VS2005), please let me know.Frankly I think SQL as done by VS2005 is messed up.Here are two Usenet threads on this problem:(1) http://tinyurl.com/2o956m or,http://groups.google.com/group/micr...1454182ae77d409(2) http://tinyurl.com/2ovybv or,http://groups.google.com/group/micr...9e5428bf0525889The second thread implies this is a bug--any fix?Also this bug might be relate to the fact I've switched (and notrebooted) from Administrator to PowerUser after successfully changingthe permissions in the SQL Server Management Studio Express (see thisthread: http://tinyurl.com/2o5yqa )Regarding this problem I might try again tommorrow to see if rebootinghelps.BTW, in the event I can't get this to work, what other SQL editor/compiler should I use besides MS Visual Studio 2005 for ADO.NET andSQL dB development?RL// source files// error message:'Authors' table saved successfully'Content' table- Unable to create relationship 'FK_Content_Authors'.The ALTER TABLE statement conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint"FK_Content_Authors". The conflict occurred in database "DCV_DB",table "dbo.Authors", column 'AuthorID'.// due to the below no doubt!--CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.InsertAuthor /* THIS IS CORRECT (what I want)'CREATE PROCEDURE' not 'ALTER PROCEDURE'*/(@LastName NVARCHAR(32) = NULL,@FirstName NVARCHAR(32) = NULL)AS/* SET NOCOUNT ON */INSERT INTO Authors (LastName, FirstName)VALUES(@LastName, @FirstName)RETURN--ALTER PROCEDURE dbo.InsertAuthor /* WRONG! I want 'CREATE PROCEDURE'not 'ALTER PROCEDURE' but VS2005 won't save it as such!!!*/(@LastName NVARCHAR(32) = NULL,@FirstName NVARCHAR(32) = NULL)AS/* SET NOCOUNT ON */INSERT INTO Authors (LastName, FirstName)VALUES(@LastName, @FirstName)RETURN--*|* Error message given: when trying to save CREATE PROCEDURE StoredProcedure: "There is already an object named 'InsertAuthor' in the dB
View 11 Replies View RelatedI have a 14GB database whose data content is legacy and is described as static. The log file is significantly large and continues to change size mostly increasing by 2-5GB a day (~60GB now) I have observed over the past two days; it shrank once unexpectly by a few GB. The instance is hosting other databases such as: EnterpriseVaultDirectory, EnterpriseVaultMonitoring, EnterpriseVaultStore, and NetPerfMon - might these seemingly unrelated data sources be involved?
I am trying to a trace to find traffic against the tables, no such luck.
Web applications are playing against it for queries but there should be no UPDATEs beign applied. I can only suspect that other unknown applications are performing operations but have yet to find unexplained connections.
Are there any other reasons why this type of log file activity would happen merely due to queries or stored procedure calls?
Lets also state, "mirroring, indexing, replication" are not at play. I know logging "Full" is not necessary as "Simple" should suffice but I am still hunting down why UPDATEs might be getting through. I realize I might adjust the migrated SQL 2000 security model to deny updates to find what breaks but would rather not take that iniative yet.
The installation is a fresh SQL 2005 Standard setup with SP2 applied; the databases were upgraded.
i need to change the production database structures with multi language Support , datatype from VARCHAR to NVARCHAR in all SQL Objects SQL Objects: Tables, Functions, Stored Procedures...Some of production Tables with 15 Croces records with 10 indexes.how to change the entire databases through SQL scripting
View 3 Replies View RelatedBit of a design question as I'm interested to know if anyone's done anythign like this...This is my main table (ish) Thing(ThingId, Ref)I then need to be able to give this "Thing" any number of attributes. Thing1 - Type:Red, Location:LondonThing2 - Type:Blue, Height:400, Width: 300Thing3 - Height:500, Location:Norwich But I have no idea how to model this in the database - it needs to be in such a way that I can add a Thing and all its attributes in one database hit basically (is there a stored procedure you could pass an array into?) My initial thoughts were to have Thing(ThingId, Ref) Attribute(AttributeId, ThingId*, AttributeTypeId*, Value) AttributeType(AttributeTypeId, Description) Is that completely mad? It seems like quite a lot of data accesses to enter a ThingIt could be Thing(ThingId, Ref, Type, Location, Height, Width) but then when "Thing - Color:White" comes along the model is stuffed Any ideas? (hope that makes sense)
View 3 Replies View RelatedIs there a way to make a string field that has an unlimited amount of characters?
View 1 Replies View RelatedIs there any way to write procedure with ulimited number of parameters?
Like in COALESCE function. You can pass one or more parameters.
Hi,
If I want to make a field of characters to be unlimited length(or maybe 2k for example), what datatype should I use?
Char, varchar and text have a max. limit of 255...
Will appreciate any suggestions.
Thanks,
Nishi