Have Been Down For Two Days Now Because We Joined A Domain And Now This...
Apr 3, 2008
Two days of downtime does not make a happy DBA.
In our frustration we dropped database "Search" completely as restoring it from backup was giving us other authorization errors. Fortunately we could rebuild the searches on the fly.
So now our service broker activation procedure tells us:
04/03/2008 17:49:51,spid55s,Unknown,The activated proc [dbo].[MessageProcessor_NameChange] running on queue AMG_Search.dbo.NameChangeQueue output the following: 'The database owner SID recorded in the master database differs from the database owner SID recorded in database 'Search'. You should correct this situation by resetting the owner of database 'Search' using the ALTER AUTHORIZATION statement.'
My username created the database. I am dbo. So what exactly am I supposed to change the owner to?
I try this:
ALTER AUTHORIZATION ON DATABASE::[Search] TO MySelf
Where MySelf is my username. And I am told Msg 15110, Level 16, State 1, "The proposed new database owner is already a user or aliased in the database" So what the heck we'll make SA the owner.
And that works.
I DON'T GET THIS PEOPLE. I created the database I am not allowed to own it anymore? We formatted the server. We reinstalled SQL server from scratch. We recreated all the usernames. Was our mistake restoring the old data from backup? Was I supposed to re-run the DDL and key all the data back in again? Is that the reccomended restore procedure? The users will be thrilled to hear this :-)
My days as an Oracle DBA were nothing like this. Security was just not this troublesome...
So if someone older, wiser, and with more experience would explain the above error message and how it occurs I would appreciate it, because something tells me I'm going to be stuck in this place again...
I have a SQL 2005 SP2 fail-over cluster with several named instances. It has been running for sometime with no problems. Recently I had to add a new windows group to a named instance. From Management Studio I brought up the "Login - new " gui hit search to find the group in out doamin and got the following error mesage:
The program cannot open the required dialog box because it cannot determine whether the computer named "<instance_name>" is joined to a domain.
The id I am using is a domain authenticated account and I used this same proceedure to add windows groups in the past. If I ignore the message and type in the group as domaingroup_name I can still add the group and users of that group can log into the instance. The other named instances have the same probelm. There are no errors in the event log or SQL's log. Any ideas on how to get the domain search back would be appriciated.
Hello,I am writing a query to select records added to a table today, in the last 3 days, in the last 7 days, and so on.Here is what I have (which seems that its not working exactly). -- total listed today SELECT COUNT (*) FROM mytable WHERE DATEDIFF(Day, mydatecolumn, getdate() ) <= 0-- total listed yesterday SELECT COUNT (*) FROM mytable WHERE DATEDIFF(Day, mydatecolumn, getdate() ) <= 1-- total listed in the last 3 days SELECT COUNT (*) FROM mytable WHERE DATEDIFF(Day, mydatecolumn, getdate() ) <= 3I'd like to be able to select the count for records added within the last X number of days. Can someone please help me out? Thanks so much in advance.
-A "master domain" AD, a "sub domain" AD, a trust relationship between the two (sub trust master) -A sql server 2005 on a win server 2003 in "sub domain" AD -A linked server to "sub domain" AD -A linked server login using a "sub domain" admin acccount -A view to this linked server -A grant on masterDomain/Domain Users to the database -A grant on subDomain/Domain Users to the database -We want all connections done through "Windows Authentication" not "Database Authentication".
Queries on the view work fine using "sub domain" user accounts. Queries on the view fail using "master domain" user accounts (including master domain admin accounts)
"Msg 7399, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
The OLE DB provider "ADsDSOObject" for linked server "ADSI" reported an error. The provider indicates that the user did not have the permission to perform the operation."
All connections are done through "Windows Authentication" not "Database Authentication".
Can we establish cross domain connectivity with "Windows Authentication" ?
Below are details of the implementation:
SELECT TOP (100) PERCENT * FROM OPENQUERY(ADSI, 'SELECT displayname, givenName, sn, cn (etc...) FROM ''LDAP://OU=PEOPLE,DC=subDomain,DC=com'' WHERE objectCategory = ''Person'' AND objectClass = ''user'' ')
In SQL Server Mngt Studio in Server Objects/Linked Servers/Providers/ ADSI properties security tab I have:
"connections will: <be made using this security context> Remote login:'subDomainAdminAccnt' With password: 'subDomainAdminAccntPassword'
Error: Msg 7399, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
The OLE DB provider "ADsDSOObject" for linked server "ADSI" reported an error. The provider indicates that the user did not have the permission to perform the operation.
Msg 7320, Level 16, State 2, Line 1
Cannot execute the query "SELECT displayname, givenName, sn, cn
FROM 'LDAP://OU=PEOPLE,DC=subDomain,DC=com'
WHERE
objectCategory = 'Person'
AND objectClass = 'user'
" against OLE DB provider "ADsDSOObject" for linked server "ADSI".
After using ADMT to migrate the domain user or group into the root domain, when I use enterprise manager to try and change the permissions allocated to that domain user/group, i get the 'Error 15401 NT user or Group not found'.
This is a correct error as the user is now in the root domain, however sql (in sysxlogins) still thinks its in the child domain.
Is there a simpler way, other than collecting the users permissions, deleting the user from SQL then adding back in with the correct domainusername format, then adding the permissions back?
I tried renaming the 'name' in sysxlogins (not recommended) and while that worked, whenever I tried to add the migrated user to another database, the login name was missing and would not resolve.
I believe it is something to do with the SID not matching.
we recently migrated from our in-house domain to the Enterprise domain. Everything went smooth except for the fact that I can no longer accept my dBs using my SA or my domain admin account. There is only 1 account I can get into the management studio with but it has no admin privileges, so I can't make any password changes or add accounts. I don't have a test environment so kind of hesitant to experiment with our production system.
I'm trying to run a test from my test environment which is a non-domain Windows 2000 server to access my domain 2003 with SQL2005. I have install 2005 tools to try to access the SQL server.
- I have try following the KB265808 - no success. - Reading alot of blogs and it seems all are pointing to the same problem. "Remote access" but the settign is enabled.Error Message:
TITLE: Connect to Server ------------------------------
An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections. (provider: Named Pipes Provider, error: 40 - Could not open a connection to SQL Server) (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 53)
For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&EvtSrc=MSSQLServer&EvtID=53&LinkId=20476
Question: Could Windows 2003 security be blocking access? I'm using sa account to access.
Also, sa account does not seems to work for remote access. It is ok when accessing locally.
Hi all,it happen to me a strange problem:i have a mdb file (in Access 2K) with SQL Server 2K linked tables whoruns on a workstation which is on a different domain that the SQLServer. It works.If i create a mdb file from a workstation which is a the domain of theSQL Server and then i run it a my non-domain workstation i have errormessage:Login failed for user '(null)'. Reason: Not associated with a trustedSQL Server connectionBut if i reattached my tables it works.If someone have an idea....PS: same ODBC on both machines
I have a table with a composite key (two primary keys) that is a foreign key to another table. I need to select all records in the primary key table where there are no matches in the foreign key table... I have no idea how to do this..
Here is how to join the tables:
Select A.Key1, A.Key2 From PrimaryKeyTable A, ForiegnKeyTable B Where A.Key1 = B.Key1 and A.Key2 = B.Key2
I need to query all records that do not join, so basically the inverse of this query. How do I do this? Please let me know if this is in the wrong forum or you need any clarifcation.
Just FYI, on a single Primary key column I would just simply do the following:
Select A.Key From PrimaryTable A, ForiegnTable B Where A.Key not in ( Select A.Key From PrimaryTable A, ForignTable B Where A.Key = B.Key)
with cte as ( select DataID, Name, SubType, FileType, MimeType, VersionID, Version
from dtree A1, dversdata A2 where A1.dataid=A2.Docid And A1.Subtype='144' AND A2.mimetype='application/news-message-id' update cte set MimeType = 'application/x-outlook-msg', Subtype=749
what I want to do is to update two columns. Both are from different tables and I get an error..
I have a table with almost a million rows, although it's quite slim with just ID, date, userID, JobID etc.
Now I want to the ability to add comments to some (probably less than 1%) of those lines.
The question is whether to create a separate comments table to join to it, or to create a comments field within the existing table? The comments field would obviously default to NULL, so wouldn't bloat the table unnecessarily if I add that field (right?), and would always be selected with the row from that table, so I'm leaning towards the latter alternative.
I posted Wednesday thinking a SELECT Distinct would solve my problem but it didn't. I have a stored procedure that is used to grab data from 4 tables that I need to join. The 1st table (Application) holds a job applicant's name and some other data The 2nd table (Jobs) holds the Job name and test type The 3rd table (Locations) holds the locations Then there is a foreign key many to many table (Application_Locations) that holds the applicants UserID and a LocationID. This table may have multiple rows for the same applicant with different locations in each row.
When the procedure is ran I want all the data that I am requesting from the Application table, and all the data that I am requesting from the Jobs table but only the 1st returned result of the Join on the Locations and Application_Locations table. What do I need to do to correct this so that I only display 1 row for each UserID no matter how many locations thay may have applied to. (You will notice that there are some IF statements so only the 2nd and 4th queries in the sproc are the ones that apply )
Here is the SPROC that is currently in place but is displaying a row for each location.
IF @JobID <> 9999 BEGIN IF @LocationID <> 9999 BEGIN SELECT A.UserID, A.Completed, A.FolderID, A.AppDateTimeStart, A.ResumeFileName, A.FirstName, A.LastName, A.PrescreenScore, A.JobID, A.ViewPre, A.ViewApp, A.ViewReport, A.ViewResume, J.JobTitle, J.TestType, L.BranchAbbreviation, AL.LocationID FROM Locations L INNER JOIN Application_Locations AL ON AL.LocationID = L.LocationID INNER JOIN Application A ON AL.UserID = A.UserID INNER JOIN Jobs J ON J.JobID = A.JobID WHERE AL.LocationID= @LocationID AND A.FolderID= @FolderID AND A.JobID = @JobID ORDER BY CASE WHEN @SortOrder = '4' THEN A.AppDateTimeStart END DESC, CASE WHEN @SortOrder = '6' THEN A.PreScreenScore END DESC, CASE WHEN @SortOrder = '2' THEN A.LastName END DESC, CASE WHEN @SortOrder = '5' THEN A.PreScreenScore END ASC, CASE WHEN @SortOrder = '3' THEN A.AppDateTimeStart END ASC, CASE WHEN @SortOrder = '1' THEN A.LastName END ASC END
ELSE BEGIN SELECT A.UserID, A.Completed, A.FolderID, A.AppDateTimeStart, A.ResumeFileName, A.FirstName, A.LastName, A.PrescreenScore, A.JobID, A.ViewPre, A.ViewApp, A.ViewReport, A.ViewResume, J.JobTitle, J.TestType, L.BranchAbbreviation, AL.LocationID FROM Locations L INNER JOIN Application_Locations AL ON AL.LocationID = L.LocationID INNER JOIN Application A ON AL.UserID = A.UserID INNER JOIN Jobs J ON J.JobID = A.JobID WHERE A.FolderID= @FolderID AND A.JobID = @JobID ORDER BY CASE WHEN @SortOrder = '4' THEN A.AppDateTimeStart END DESC, CASE WHEN @SortOrder = '6' THEN A.PreScreenScore END DESC, CASE WHEN @SortOrder = '2' THEN A.LastName END DESC, CASE WHEN @SortOrder = '5' THEN A.PreScreenScore END ASC, CASE WHEN @SortOrder = '3' THEN A.AppDateTimeStart END ASC, CASE WHEN @SortOrder = '1' THEN A.LastName END ASC END END
ELSE BEGIN IF @LocationID <> 9999 BEGIN SELECT A.UserID, A.Completed, A.FolderID, A.AppDateTimeStart, A.ResumeFileName, A.FirstName, A.LastName, A.PrescreenScore, A.JobID, A.ViewPre, A.ViewApp, A.ViewReport, A.ViewResume, J.JobTitle, J.TestType, L.BranchAbbreviation, AL.LocationID FROM Locations L INNER JOIN Application_Locations AL ON AL.LocationID = L.LocationID INNER JOIN Application A ON AL.UserID = A.UserID INNER JOIN Jobs J ON J.JobID = A.JobID WHERE AL.LocationID= @LocationID AND A.FolderID= @FolderID ORDER BY CASE WHEN @SortOrder = '4' THEN A.AppDateTimeStart END DESC, CASE WHEN @SortOrder = '6' THEN A.PreScreenScore END DESC, CASE WHEN @SortOrder = '2' THEN A.LastName END DESC, CASE WHEN @SortOrder = '5' THEN A.PreScreenScore END ASC, CASE WHEN @SortOrder = '3' THEN A.AppDateTimeStart END ASC, CASE WHEN @SortOrder = '1' THEN A.LastName END ASC END
ELSE BEGIN SELECT A.UserID, A.Completed, A.FolderID, A.AppDateTimeStart, A.ResumeFileName, A.FirstName, A.LastName, A.PrescreenScore, A.JobID, A.ViewPre, A.ViewApp, A.ViewReport, A.ViewResume, J.JobTitle, J.TestType, L.BranchAbbreviation, AL.LocationID FROM Locations L INNER JOIN Application_Locations AL ON AL.LocationID = L.LocationID INNER JOIN Application A ON AL.UserID = A.UserID INNER JOIN Jobs J ON J.JobID = A.JobID WHERE A.FolderID= @FolderID ORDER BY CASE WHEN @SortOrder = '4' THEN A.AppDateTimeStart END DESC, CASE WHEN @SortOrder = '6' THEN A.PreScreenScore END DESC, CASE WHEN @SortOrder = '2' THEN A.LastName END DESC, CASE WHEN @SortOrder = '5' THEN A.PreScreenScore END ASC, CASE WHEN @SortOrder = '3' THEN A.AppDateTimeStart END ASC, CASE WHEN @SortOrder = '1' THEN A.LastName END ASC END END GO
Hi all,Currently our product has a setup that stores information abouttransactions in a transaction table. Additionally, certain transactionspertain to specific people, and extra information is stored in anothertable. So for good or ill, things look like this right now:create table TransactionHistory (TrnID int identity (1,1),TrnDT datetime,--other information about a basic transaction goes here.--All transactions have this infoPrimary Key Clustered (TrnID))Create Index TrnDTIndex on TransactionHistory(TrnDT)create table PersonTransactionHistory (TrnID int,PersonID int,--extended data pertaining only to "person" transactions goes--here. only Person transactions have thisPrimary Key Clustered(TrnID),Foreign Key (TrnID) references TransactionHistory (TrnID))Create Index TrnPersonIDIndex on PersonTransactionHistory(Person)A query about a group of people over a certain date range might fetchinformation like so:select * from TransactionHistory THinner join PersonTransactionHistory PTHon TH.TrnID = PTH.TrnIDwhere PTH.PersonID in some criteriaand TH.TrnDT between some date and some dateIn my experience, this poses a real problem when trying to run queriesthat uses both date and personID criteria. If my guesses are correct thisis because SQL is forced to do one of two things:1 - Use TrnPersonIDIndex to find all transactions which match the personcriteria, then for each do a lookup in the PersonTransactionHistory tofetch the TrnID and subsequently do a lookup of the TrnID in the clusteredindex of the TransactionHistory Table, and finally determine if a giventransaction also matches the date time criteria.2 - Use TrnDTIndex to final all transaction matching the date criteria,and then perform lookups similar to the above, except for personID insteadof datetime.Compounding this is my suspicion (based on performance comparison of whenI specify which indexes to use in the query vs when I let SQL Serverdecide itself) that SQL sometimes chooses a very non optimal course. (Ofcourse, sometimes it chooses a better course than me - the point is I wantit to always be able to pick a good enough course such that I don't haveto bother specifying). Perhaps the table layout is making it difficult forSQL Server to find a good query plan in all cases.Basically I'm trying to determine ways to improve our table design here tomake reporting easier, as this gets painful when running report forlarge groups of people during large date ranges. I see a few options basedon my above hypothesis, and am looking for comments and/or corrections.1 - Add the TrnDT column to the PersonTransactionHistory Table aswell. Then create a foreign key relationship of PersonTransactionHistory(TrnID, TrnDT) references TransactionHistory (TrnID, TrnDT) and createindexes on PersonTransactionHistory with (TrnDT, PersonID) and(PersonID, TrnDT). This seems like it would let SQL Server makemuch more efficient execution plans. However, I am unsure if SQL servercan leverage the FK on TrnDT to use those new indexes if I give it a querylike:select * from TransactionHistory THinner join PersonTransactionHistory PTHon TH.TrnID = PTH.TrnIDwhere PTH.PersonID in some criteriaand TH.TrnDT between some date and some dateThe trick being that SQL server would know that it can use PTH.TrnDT andTH.TrnDT interchangably because of the foreign key (this would support allthe preexisting existing queries that explicitly named TH.TrnDT - any thatdidn't explicitly specify the table would now have ambigious columnnames...)2 - Just coalesce the two tables into one. The original intent was to savespace by not requiring extra columns about Persons for all rows, many ofwhich did not have anything to do with a particular person (for instance acontact point going active). In my experience with our product, the enduser's decisions about archiving and purging have a much bigger impactthan this, so in my opinion efficient querying is more important thanspace. However I'm not sure if this is an elegant solution either. It alsomight require more changes to existing code, although the use of viewsmight help.We also run reports based on other criteria (columns I replaced withcomments above) but none of them are as problematic as the situationabove. However, it seems that if I can understand the best way to solvethis, I will be able to leverage that approach if other types of reportsbecome problematic.Any opinions would be greatly appreciated. Also any references to goodsources regarding table and index design would be helpful as well (onlineor offline references...)thanks,Dave
The joined view is named "dbo.viewExecView" and is like:
SELECT Bank_No, data_center FROM [ALPHASQL2000].ev_db.dbo.Bank
The new view that joins to the above view is like:
SELECT bank.BankID, evBank.data_center AS DataCenterID FROM dbo.Bank AS bank INNER JOIN dbo.viewExecView_Bank AS evBank ON bank.BankID = evBank.BankID WHERE (bank.InactiveDate IS NULL)
Note: The data_center column (an int) was recently added to the Bank table in the linked ev_db database and it shows up there. It also shows up in the view "dbo.viewExecView". It does not appear in the new view that joins to "dbo.viewExecView". And when I run the 'new' view, I get an Error Message: Invalid column name 'data_center'.
I've tried to simplify this as much as possible while still including the pertinent information. Any help very much appreciated, I am currently stumped.
I am using SQL Server 2005 to publish joined tables for SQL Mobile subscribers for merge replication and column level tracking.
Using Management Studio I am trying to join tables and specify row filters on the joined tables. I.E. table 1 is joined with table 2. I need to define row filters for table 1 and row filters specific to table 2.
An example would be: Table 1 is a customer table that I filter on a specific customer. Table 2 might be an orders table that I need to join to get the customers orders but I also want to filter for open orders only.
When I specify the row filter for table 2 the join appears to be ignored and I receive the complete table 2 with the row filter applied.
I have searched the online books and the web and I have not run accross an example of using both joins and row filters where the filters are specified for both joined tables.
Ok here goes. I have 3 tables, one holds case info, the 2nd holds possible outcome on the charges, and they're joined on a 3rd table (CaseOutComes). With me so far? Easy stuff, now for the hard part. Since there's a very common possiblitly that the Case has multiple charges, we need to track those, and therefore, display them on a datagrid or some other control. I want the user to be able to edit the info and have X number of dropdowns pertaining to how many ever charges are on the case. I can get the query to return the rows no sweat, but ...merging them into 1 record (1 row) with mutiple drops is seeming impossible -- I thought about using a placeholder and added the controls that way, but it was not in agreement with what I was trying to tell it . Any ideas on how to attack this?
Hello all, Iv been making a lot of progress on my first functional webapp, but I cannot get this bit of code to work correctly. I think my UPDATE SQL statement is where the problem is. It works fine the first time through when there is no Session("estimateid") set, but after that is set it gives me error this on line 40: Incorrect syntax near '('. 1 Dim CustID As Integer 2 3 Dim DbConnection As SqlConnection 4 DbConnection = New SqlConnection(ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings("harringtonairdb").ConnectionString) 5 DbConnection.Open() 6 Dim DbCommand As SqlCommand 7 8 If Session("estimateid") = 0 Then 9 Dim DbSqlInsert As String 10 DbSqlInsert = "INSERT INTO tblcustomers (strname, strAddress1, strAddress2, strCity, strState, strZip, strPhone, strEmail, strContact) VALUES (@name, @address1, @address2, @city, @state, @zip, @phone, @email, @contact)" & "SELECT @@IDENTITY AS CustID" 11 DbCommand = New SqlCommand(DbSqlInsert, DbConnection) 12 Else 13 Dim DbSqlUpdate As String 14 DbSqlUpdate = "UPDATE tblcustomers SET (strcustname=@name, straddress1=@address1, straddress2=@address2, strcity=@city, strstate=@state, strzip=@zip, strphone=@phone, stremail=@email, strcontact=@contact) JOIN tblestimates ON pkcustomerid WHERE pkestimateid=@estimateid" 15 DbCommand = New SqlCommand(DbSqlUpdate, DbConnection) 16 DbCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@estimateid", Session("estimateid")) 17 18 End If 19 20 DbCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@name", txtCustName.Text) 21 DbCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@address1", txtCustAddress1.Text) 22 DbCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@address2", txtCustAddress2.Text) 23 DbCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@city", txtCustCity.Text) 24 DbCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@state", txtCustState.Text) 25 DbCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@zip", txtCustZip.Text) 26 DbCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@phone", txtCustPhone.Text) 27 DbCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@email", txtCustEmail.Text) 28 DbCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@contact", txtCustTimes.Text) 29 30 31 If Session("estimateid") = 0 Then 32 CustID = Convert.ToInt32(DbCommand.ExecuteScalar()) 33 DbCommand.Dispose() 34 Dim DbSqlInsert As String 35 DbSqlInsert = "INSERT INTO tblestimates (fkcustomerid) VALUES (@customerid)" & "SELECT @@IDENTITY AS EstimateID" 36 DbCommand = New SqlCommand(DbSqlInsert, DbConnection) 37 DbCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@customerid", CustID) 38 Session.Add("estimateid", Convert.ToInt32(DbCommand.ExecuteScalar())) 39 Else 40 DbCommand.ExecuteNonQuery() 41 End If 42 43 DbConnection.Close() 44 DbCommand.Dispose()
I have 4 tables inner joined. Two of tables have ~500,000 rows, while other 2 have ~60,000. There are 4-5 WHERE conditions for 3 tables. Is it normal that a query lasts ~13-15 seconds? I tried indexing in all ways, subselects, temp tables etc, nothing helped.
I think it is unuseful to use indexes because WHERE conditions apply not to one, but to 3 tables.
Is there anyone who is expert in this topic? Thanx B
I want to update the startdate column (for all rows) so that when period is 0 then the new value is a hardcoded value (say '01-Dec-2000') but for all other rows it takes the value in the enddate column for the row of the previous column (with the same freq)
ie the startdate column for period 1 takes the enddate value for period 0 and so on for a particular freq
create table #periods (period int , startdate datetime , [enddate] datetime , freq int) insert #periods ( period , startdate , enddate , freq) select 0 , '01-Jan-1900' , '31-Jan-2001' , 1 union all select 1 , '01-Jan-1900' , '28-Feb-2001' , 1 union all select 2 , '01-Jan-1900' , '31-Mar-2001' , 1 union all select 3 , '01-Jan-1900' , '30-Apr-2001' , 1 union all select 4 , '01-Jan-1900' , '31-May-2001' , 1 union all select 0 , '01-Jan-1900' , '31-Jan-2002' , 3 union all select 1 , '01-Jan-1900' , '28-Feb-2002' , 3 union all select 2 , '01-Jan-1900' , '31-Mar-2002' , 3 union all select 3 , '01-Jan-1900' , '30-Apr-2002' , 3 union all select 4 , '01-Jan-1900' , '31-May-2002' , 3
/* I know I need a case statement to test for column 0 and to join the table on itself and have put something together but it fails for column 0 and updates to NULL - I think it must be to do with the join ??
This is what I've got so far :
UPDATE PA1 SET PA1.Startdate = CASE WHEN PA2.period = 0 THEN 2000-12-01 00:00:00.000 ELSE PA1.Enddate END FROM #periods AS PA1 JOIN #periods AS PA2 ON PA1.Freq = PA2.Freq AND PA1.Period = PA2.Period + 1
Table 1 Customers with column CustomerId Table 2 Purchases with columns PurchaseId and CustomerId
I want to select all customers who have made just 1 purchase, what would be the sql for that? I know I can join the tables to get the customers with purchases, but I don't know how to limit it to those with just 1 purchase (and exclude all the other customers).
I want to return all rows in table giftregistryitems with an additional column that holds the sum of column `amount` in table giftregistrypurchases for the respective item in table giftregistryitems.
What I tried, but what returns NULL for purchasedamount, where I want purchasedamount to be the sum of the `amount` for THAT item, based on giftregistrypurchases.itemid=giftregistryitems.id:
SELECT (SELECT SUM(amount) from giftregistrypurchases gps where registryid=gi.registryid AND gp.itemid=gps.itemid) as purchasedamount,* FROM giftregistryitems gi LEFT JOIN giftregistrypurchases gp on gp.registryid=gi.id WHERE gi.registryid=2
How can I achieve what I need?
Here's my table definition and data:
USE [tt] GO /****** Object: Table [dbo].[giftregistry] Script Date: 09-05-15 11:15:18 ******/ SET ANSI_NULLS ON GO SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON GO CREATE TABLE [dbo].[giftregistry]( [id] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
what i need is query the tbl1 for a range of serials,get the pcb and for those pcb's query the tbl2 for data1,data2 The resultSet should be a join on the two tables, Columns {serial} from tbl1 and {pcb,date_time,data1,data2} from tbl2
Please follow my simple example: Suppose tbl1 has these 2 records tbl1 = pcb1,sn1,pass pcb2,sn2,pass pcb3,sn3,pass
where date1 is the most recent date and date6 the least recent
Request:what i want is for serial>=sn1 and serial<=sn2,get the pcbs from tbl1(which are pcb1 and pcb2) and based on these, query the tbl2 for the other data but retrieve only most recent records.
and not pcb1,date1,pass,dataX1,dataY1 pcb1,date2,pass,dataX2,dataY2 pcb1,date5,pass,dataX5,dataY5 pcb2,date3,pass,dataX3,dataY3 pcb2,date6,pass,dataX6,dataY6
What i already did is this:
select max(CONVERT(DATETIME,tbl2.date_time,103)),tbl1.serial,tbl2.pcb from tbl2 left JOIN tbl1 ON tbl2.Pcb=tbl1.pcb where tbl1.serial>='1' and tbl1.serial<='53' and tbl2."Result" like 'pass' and tbl1."result" like 'pass' group by tbl2.pcb,tbl1.serial;
This works correctly for getting serial from tbl1, date_time and pcb from tbl2.But unfortunately i also need data1 and data2 columns from tbl2. If i include them in the Select Clause i have to include them also in the group by ,and this gives me also duplicate records (by using this OR philosophy).I mean, it would give all records containing (pcb1,pcb2),much like my example
I'm managing an amature online university and I've been charged with creating a deans list. I have a table for exam results for each course.. currently totaling 5. I have an employeeID column and a total_points column in each table. Sooooo I need to join all the tables and get an average for total_points where the employeeID matches across tables. I have no idea how to write this select.. any help?
I have four tables (all inner joined) and currently they give me the results i need. However, my boss has now asked me to return all associated accounts as well.
I am currently pulling data from the four tables to make up my results table, and the returned results are based on the loan types in my loans tables having a loan type of '1A'
So if the loan type is 1A I get a result.
However, Mr Smith (for example) may have three loans but only one of them is type '1A'. The other two might be type '5H' and '2'.
What I need to be able to do is return all the associated accounts of any customer that has a type '1A' loan.
This is my code:
Select c.customernumber, l.accountsuffix, c.forename, c.surname, lt.code, l.balance, j.journeynumber from customers c inner join loanagreements l on c.customerid = l.customerid inner join loantypes lt on l.loantypeid = lt.loantypeid inner join journeys j on c.journeyid = j.journeyid Where j.journeynumber = 93 and lt.code = '1a' and l.balance >0
Hello everyone, I have a query problem.I'll put it like this. There is a 'publishers' table, and there is a'titles' table. Publishers publish titles (of course). Now I want to make aquery (in MS SQL Server) that would return the last title published by everyof the publishers. Quite clear situation. But I can't make it work.If I use inner join (which I should, because I need data from both tables)then I get a result showing all publishers and all titles. What I want toget is all publishers, and only their last title, so I don't have more thanone line for the same publisher, and this line should contain publisherdetails and last title details.I tried using DISTINCT, but it works on a whole resultant row rather then acolumn, and since rows are all distnict (because they also contain columnsfrom titles) this didn't help me.What I can do is (in my application) first get a list of publishers, andthen loop through them selecting only the last title belonging to eachpublisher. I want to see if there is a way to accomplish the same thing withan SQL query (or maybe a stored procedure, view, or whatever). Anything ispossible, as long as it stays within SQL server and doesn't rely on theclient application.Of course, both 'publishers' and 'titles' tables have a primary key('publisherID', and 'titleID'), and 'titles' has a 'publisherID' columnwhich relates titles with publishers.Help :)
I get a 90-120 second blocking when send 15 or so simultaneous queriesto SQL Server 2000 that query a view made up of two joined tables.After each query is blocking for the same amount of time they allreturn. Further identical queries of this type work in 3-4 seconds(caching?) until hours later where it happens again. If I query thetables directly (without the view) I still get the same blocking. If Iremove the join (it is a simple inner join on two columns) I do not getthe blocking.Any ideas?
