Having A Mental Block On An Exclusive Join
Feb 9, 2008
Hi, I've got three tables that I'm trying to pull data from. The first is a family of rings, the second is the individual rings and the third relates one ring to another:
RingFamilies
------------------------------------
FamilyID pk | FamName
------------------------------------
Rings
-------------------------------------------
RingID | FamilyID fk | RingName
-------------------------------------------
RingAssociations
-----------------------------------------
RingID1 pk/fk | RingID2 pk/fk
-----------------------------------------
I'm trying to pull a list of RingIDs and names for a given FamilyID. To complicate it, I want to exclude rings that are already associated to a given RingID, i.e. I only want the unassociated rings in a given family. To complicate it even a little more then name needs to be the FamName+RingName...is this possible? Thanks!
Given @FamID and @RingID
Result Table
------------------------------------------------
RingID | FamName + RingName
------------------------------------------------
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
May 21, 2006
SELECT src_terrier.Areacode, src_terrier.siteref, src_terrier.estatename, src_terrier.Securitised, src_terrier.unitref, src_terrier.unittype, src_terrier.unittype_count, src_terrier.tenantname, src_terrier.tenantstatus, src_terrier.tenantstatus_count, src_terrier.unitstatus, src_terrier.unitstatus_count, src_terrier.floortotal, src_terrier.floortotocc, src_terrier.initialvacarea, src_terrier.initialvacnet, src_terrier.TotalRent, src_terrier.NetRent, src_terrier.FinalRtLsincSC, src_terrier.ErvTot, src_terrier.tenancyterm, src_terrier.landact, src_terrier.datadate, src_div_mgr.div_mgr, src_portfolio_mgr.portfolio_mgr, src_centre_list.propcat
FROM src_terrier INNER JOIN src_centre_list ON src_terrier.siteref = src_centre_list.Site_Ref AND src_terrier.Areacode = src_centre_list.Division INNER JOIN src_div_mgr ON src_centre_list.Division = src_div_mgr.division INNER JOIN src_portfolio_mgr ON src_centre_list.Portfolio_no = src_portfolio_mgr.portfolio_no
WHERE (src_terrier.datadate = @dt_src_date) AND (@chr_div is null or src_terrier.Areacode = @chr_div) AND (@vch_portfolio_no is null or src_centre_list.Portfolio_no = @vch_portfolio_no) AND (@vch_prop_cat is null or src_centre_list.propcat = @vch_prop_cat)
How can I modify this function in two ways
1. I want the value of src_terrier.siteref to be matched to a different table src_tbl_budget.siteref. I want all rows in src_terrier.siteref and only the one row from the new table where the siteref is matched.
2. Also part of the new query, not only do I want it to match the siteref, I also want it to only match the mm/yyyy of the parameter entered (src_terrier.datadate = @dt_src_date) in the WHERE statement.
Is that any simpler?
Regards
Toni Chaffin
aka Toni
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 9, 2007
I'm having a mental block here and would like to get things straight. All this while trying to learn and deploy SSB.
I belive my scenario is perfect for this solution. So I'm asking for your help. Simply I have the following process:
1. A record is inserted into a table.
2. Take this transaction and convert to XML file
3. Send XML version to web service where it is processed and the result is returned.
4. take the result and insert as into a different table (from the first).
My requirement to this process is that each step updates a status indicator in the original table. Second, since communication to the web service is not reliable, the message should retry until service is restored. Or failing that, after a timeout, should be in a state that can be restarted. And, lastly, the process sohuld be restartale in the event of failure.
I'm confident that the tasks and requirements are pretty simple and straighforward. But I'm not sure of the implementation.
1. Created initial record table.
2. Created SQL statement that converts single row to XML document
3. Created CLR Stored procedure that takes an XML and submits to Web Service and collects response.
So I think the question are;
1. Do I create two conversations? One for each direction of the message. ('to' the web svc and 'from' the web svc)
2. Do I create an intermediate table that feeds a queuefor the return message.
3. Where do I place the logic to update the Status flag? At the beginning of the next step? or the end of the executing step?
4. How do I ensure that a transaction is not lost from the time sent to the web service to the receipt of the response?
I'm using 'Pro SQL Server 2005' by Thomas Rizzo as a reference. Are there any better references? Most google responses seem to point to articles reiterating the base concepts. Would the 'Pro Sql 2005 Service Broker' book provide answers to my questions?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 25, 2007
Sorry for the akward title, not sure how to say this. I have a Person table and a addresses table. Each person may have many address records as shown below:
Person
-----------
PersonID | AutoNum
fName | varchar
lName | varchar
...etc
Addresses
---------------
addressID | AutoNum
personID | int (FK)
address1 | varchar
city | varchar
state | varchar
isPrimary | bit
...etc
What I'm trying to do is select all from Person and the city and state of each person's primary address. A little voice keeps saying subquery...but I can't figure it out. So far I have the SQL below, but if there is no address or no address where isPrimary = 1, it fails to return the person record. I need the person record regardless of if they have a primary address. Does that make sense?
Doesn't return all Person records:
SELECT Person.*, Address.City, Address.State
FROM Person LEFT OUTER JOIN Address
ON Person.PersonID = Address.PersonID
WHERE (Address.isPrimary= 1)
ORDER BY Person.lName, Person.fName
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 12, 2007
Here is the situation i am stuck with, see the example first and below explained the problem:
-- 'SESSION A
create table foo (
id integer,
pid integer,
data varchar(10)
);
begin transaction
insert into foo values ( 1, 1, 'foo' )
insert into foo values ( 2, 1, 'bar' )
insert into foo values ( 3, 1, 'bozo' )
insert into foo values ( 4, 2, 'snafu' )
insert into foo values ( 5, 2, 'rimrom' )
insert into foo values ( 6, 2, 'blark' )
insert into foo values ( 7, 3, 'smeg' )
commit transaction
create index foo_id_idx on foo ( id )
create index foo_pid_idx on foo ( pid )
begin transaction
insert into foo values ( 9, 3, 'blamo' )
-- 'SESSION B
begin transaction
select id, data from foo with ( updlock, rowlock ) where id = 5;
-- Problem:
-- Uncommitted transaction in session A, with insert into table FOO, aquires lock on index foo_pid_idx which BLOCKS select with ( updlock, rowlock ) in session B.
-- Insert should aquire only exclusive rowlock. Why does insert block select with ( updlock, rowlock )?
Appreciate your help,
Rajesh.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Hello folks,first of all I really don't know how you gurus call this way ofwriting joins:SELECTA.FIELD,B.FIELDFROMTABLE_A A,TABLE_B BWHEREA.ID_FIELD = B.ID_FIELDI find this way very useful and readable. It works also with left andright Joins (using *= or =* instead of = )A friend of mine found that the inner join way (using = ) in Access ismuch more slower than using the classic INNER JOIN TABLE ON FIELDsintax. My question is: was MSSQL Server studied for using the shortway, or it is just a workaround found by someone? Is there aperformance degrade folllowing this way?TIA,tK
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 3, 2014
I have the following stored procedure to test scope of variables
alter proc updatePrereq
@pcntr int,
@pmax int
as
begin
[Code] ....
In the above script @i is declare in the if block only when the @pcntr value is 1. Assume the above stored procedure is called 5 times from this script
declare @z int
set @z = 1
declare @max int
set @max = 5
while @z <= @max
begin
exec dbo.updatePrereq @z, @max
set @z = @z + 1
end
go
As i said earlier `@i` variable exists only when `@pcntr` is `1`. Therefore when i call the stored procedure for the second time and so forth the control cannot enter the if block therefore @i variable wouldn't even exist. But the script prints the value in `@i` in each iteration, How comes this is possible should it throw an error saying `@i` variable does not exist when `@pcntr` values is greater than `1`?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 21, 2003
Hi,
When I open an application, it prompts me for a message that SQL is locked in exclusive mode by other application.
How to solve this?
thanks in advance
christine
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 30, 2004
Is there a way to do a logical exclusive OR (XOR) in sql server?
I'm trying to do this in where clause, something like:
WHERE
(not exists (select 1 from table a where a.date > '01/30/03') XOR
exists (select 1 from table a where a.date < '01/30/03'))
Thanks!
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jun 11, 2008
Hi,
How do you lock a table in exclusie mode before running a query?
thanks,
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 17, 2007
A problem about many to many relationships from an SQL beginner. Here's a contrived abstract example, as I'd prefer not to give away specifics.
Imagine I have two tables: users, food
The relationship (to like) is many-to-many so I've got a link table, which might look like the below:
andrew, apples
bob, banana
bob, apples
chris, carrots
chris, apples
chris, banana
I want to select users who like bananas and apples exclusively.
The answer should be 'bob' ONLY. select * from users inner join food on <IDs> where food in ('bananas','apples') isn't suitable , because it'll also return 'chris' who should be disqualified (because he also likes carrots).
Apart from potentially being bad DB design (although this is an abstract example; I do have ID numbers), can anyone suggest how to get this in a scalable way?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Aug 9, 2000
Anybody know how a SELECT statement can generate an exclusive lock on a table ?
I always thought that SELECT's take out shared locks. Is this something to do with temporary tables generated by ORDER BY's and DISTINCT ?
Rogue SQL below (from Site Server).
SELECT A.i_Dsid, A.i_Aid, A.vc_Val, A.i_Val, A.dt_Val, A.img_Val FROM Object_Attributes A, ( SELECT DISTINCT L.i_Dsid FROM Object_Lookup L , Object_Attributes OA2 (index = IND_vc_Aid) WHERE ((( L.i_ObjectClass = 9999 )) AND ( OA2.vc_Val LIKE ( '999999999.9999999%' ) AND OA2.i_Aid = 99)) AND (L.i_Container_Dsid = 99) AND ( OA2.i_Dsid = L.i_Dsid )) AS B WHERE B.i_Dsid = A.i_Dsid AND A.i_Aid NOT IN( 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ) ORDER BY A.i_Dsid, A.i_Aid
Can anybody suggest a workaround ? Thanks.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2003
Hi,
i need to run a restore of a database overnight onto a different server using the live data .bak file. however the job failed on the first run (last night) with the error:
"Exclusive access could not be obtained because the database is in use. ...."
how do i gain this Exclusive use via an SQL statement please?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jul 12, 2004
Hi.
I need to access a database to modify, updates,... massively . It's possible to lock a database and have exclusive access?
(SQLServer 2000)
thanks.
Francisco
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 11, 2004
I have created a SQL Agent job that is supposed to essentially duplicate a production database to another database. The code I am using is:
step1
__________________________________________________ ______
declare @sql varchar(8000)
set @sql=''
select @sql=@sql+'kill '+cast(spid as varchar)+char(13)+char(10)
from sysprocesses where dbid=12
--Print (@SQL)
exec(@sql)
step2
__________________________________________________ ________
RESTORE DATABASE HIWDYNARPT FROM PRDBACKUP
WITH REPLACE
__________________________________________________ ______
This works when I test it during the day, however when it runs at night I get the following error in the job log:
Database in use. The system administrator must have exclusive use of the database to run the restore operation. [SQLSTATE 42000] (Error 3101) Backup or restore operation terminating abnormally. [SQLSTATE 42000] (Error 3013). The step failed.
I'm not sure why this happens because I have killed all open threads in step 1, and then create my own new thread in step two. Maybe someone else is initiating a new thread to quickly between the steps???
Anyway, I am trying to use:
__________________________________________________ __
ALTER DATABASE HIWDYNARPT
RESTRICTED_USER
WITH ROLLBACK IMMEDIATE
__________________________________________________ ____
...as an alternative to the T-SQL killing PID's, but SQL 7.0 SP4 does not seem to support restricted user like 2000. It keeps giving me a syntax error. Does anyone have any suggestions?
If I bring step 1 and step 2 together, separated by "GO", could this fix the problem?
Thanks in advance!
Ryan Hunt
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 8, 2007
Could anybody give a lead as to what I can do get rid off this error please.
I alread tried following:
use master
go
Alter Database dbname set single_user with rollback immediate;
go
Still have the issue. SQL 2005 Server actually did lock the db.
So ran
Alter Database dbname set multi_user;
go
and refresh Query and it switch back to multi user.
But I can't restore db yet.
Thank you
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 4, 2008
Are Intent exclusive locks compatible with rowlock?
I am getting a deadlock since i have ix lock on a page and another process(select query) is trying to acquire a shared lock.How can i solve this?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 10, 2007
Hello All!
I want to perform 4 or 5 statements as a transaction but I need to make sure that during this complete transaction no one else inserts or deletes records from a table named SomeTable.
So how can I lock MyTable at the beggining of the transaction so that during my transaction no one else can insert or delete anything in table SomeTable?
Thanks!
David
View 9 Replies
View Related
May 25, 2004
How to close the existing connections to a particluar database in sql server. Please note that i donot want to start stop sql server. I just want to close the existing connections so that i can do a restore on that database programatically.
I am using sqldmo for this purpose. Does anyone knows how to do that with sqldmo or is there any other method??
Waiting for your earliest replies
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 21, 2000
Hi,
Is it possible to place an exclusive row lock when running a SELECT query by using a lock hint (or otherwise).
Basically, when a select statement is run against a table I don't won't any other users to read that row until it has been updated - at some later stage.
Any suggestions on whether this is possible would be welcome.
Thanks,
Karl
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 25, 2001
HI, i am trying to make query that has computations with it. but when there's a point computing between int and float i had to use cast() function to convert certain data types. somehow it only works on converting float to integer because when i'm converting an integer into float inorder to be computed with a float it bombs. my query is like this ....
SELECT cast(((cast(((lat - (SELECT LAT FROM TPS_ZIPUSA WHERE ZIP_CODE = 00210)) * 69.1) AS int) ^ 2) + (cast((69.1 * (lng - (SELECT Lng FROM TPS_ZIPUSA WHERE ZIP_CODE = 00210)) * (COS((SELECT LAT FROM TPS_ZIPUSA WHERE ZIP_CODE = 00210) / 57.3))) AS int) ^ 2)) AS float) ^ .5
FROM TPS_ZIPUSA
.5 is where the query bombs. any idea why is this happenning?
by the way, i'm using sql server 7.0.
francis,
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 31, 2008
Hi!
We're using a backup with sql server agent when doing a backup / restore
procedure. In some cases I get the following error when the restore job
fails:
Executed as user: DOMAINAdministrator. Exclusive access could not be
obtained because the database is in use. [SQLSTATE 42000] (Error 3101)
RESTORE DATABASE is terminating abnormally. [SQLSTATE 42000] (Error 3013).
The step failed.
Is it related to unhandled lock? I've resolved this by restarting the sql
server. But is there a way to avoid such issues?
One more question. Is it OK to backup/restore database while there're users
connected? Or I can do only backup?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 1, 2004
I'm relatively new to SQL and I've come across something that doesn't seem quite right. When an insert becomes part of an transaction I notice an exclusive KEY lock in Enterprise Manager. The table in question was using a Clustered index but I changed that, dropped the table and brought it back in but I still get the lock which keeps all others out of the table. Is this the expected behavior or is there something I am missing? Could the size of the tabe affect things? This is a very small table currently. I'm using MSSQL 7 sp3.
Thanks,
John
View 10 Replies
View Related
May 12, 2008
Hi ,
I have some issues with deadlock.I am getting deadlock becuase of two
select on same table. The sql server log is like this ,
Select statements should have always shared lock.I am not getting why
its doing exclusive lock and creating deadlock.
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Deadlock encountered ¦. Printing
deadlock information
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Wait-for graph
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Log Viewer could not read information
for this log entry. Cause: Data is Null. This method or property
cannot be called on Null values.. Content:
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Node:1
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown KEY: 9:72057594050117632 (8d036f07c58f)
CleanCnt:3 Mode Flags: 0Γ0
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Grant List 3:
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Owner:0Γ12E9F160 Mode: S Flg:0Γ0 Ref:1
Life:00000001 SPID:68 ECID:0 XactLockInfo: 0Γ353D1C54
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown SPID: 68 ECID: 0 Statement Type: SELECT
Line #: 4
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Input Buf: Language Event: (@actDefId
nvarchar(36)@stateList varchar(1)@stateList1 varchar(1)@procRelObjType
smallint@procRelObjIdList varchar(36))
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Requested By:
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown ResType:LockOwner Stype:ORXdes:
0Γ2FBB67F0 Mode: X SPID:112 BatchID:0 ECID:0 TaskProxy0Γ0792E378)
Value:0Γ38baa20 Cost0/11888)
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Log Viewer could not read information
for this log entry. Cause: Data is Null. This method or property
cannot be called on Null values.. Content:
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Node:2
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown KEY: 9:72057594049986560 (6f02e1cd37c3)
CleanCnt:3 Mode:X Flags: 0Γ0
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Wait List:
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Owner:0Γ12396EE0 Mode: S Flg:0Γ2 Ref:1
Life:00000000 SPID:90 ECID:0 XactLockInfo: 0Γ0AA8178C
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown SPID: 90 ECID: 0 Statement Type: SELECT
Line #: 4
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Input Buf: Language Event: (@actDefId
nvarchar(36)@stateList varchar(1)@stateList1 varchar(1)@procRelObjType
smallint@procRelObjIdList varchar(36))
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Requested By:
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown ResType:LockOwner Stype:ORXdes:
0Γ353D1C30 Mode: S SPID:68 BatchID:0 ECID:0 TaskProxy0Γ13B3E378)
Value:0Γ12e9e780 Cost0/6164)
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Log Viewer could not read information
for this log entry. Cause: Data is Null. This method or property
cannot be called on Null values.. Content:
If you have any idea regarding this please let me know ASAP.
Thanks in advance .
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 5, 2008
Purpose
I would like to know if it is possible and if so how to implement exclusive access to a given record within in a database table.
Example
For example, you can open a file system file with exclusive access so other processes cannot access the file until it is released. I would like to implement a solution that provides this same exclusive access at the database record level. Preferably a solution that does not require creating and managing table access state flags. (i.e. FieldName.State = (Closed, Opened, Exclusive)) I would like for the database server to mange this solution and return an error status when trying to access a record that has been opened exclusively. Furthermore, I would like to avoid using triggers.
Application Utilization
Im working on a system that has multiple threads that are each responsible managing data from the same normalized table. Each of these system threads work on the same unique record in parallel. Therefore it is possible that thread (0)s changes could be overwritten by thread (n)s. I would like to have each thread open the unique record exclusively and release it when finished. All of the other threads would loop until the record is released.
Questions
1. Is it possible to implement this at the server level?
2. What would be the easiest best practice for implementing this functional requirement?
Thanks,
Sean
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 29, 2007
Hi All,
My question is regarding SQL Server database security. I want to create a login using SQL Server Authentication and assign it db_owner rights for my database. So far so good. But the critical part is that I want to give exclusive rights for my database to this user only i.e. no other users (dbo, guest etc) should be allowed to access my database.
It will be good to present here the scenario which I need to implement. I am running an ASP.NET application that uses SQL server 2005 db at back end. The database server might have other databases as well but I don't want the administrator (either SQL server admin or the server administrator) to be able to get access to my database or even view the schema. I don't want any other user except my own user to be able to detach the database or perform backup or restore operations.
I hope I was able to deliver the requirement.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 11, 2007
Hi
I am trying to use sql server 2005 management stodio to restore a database. But I got this error message:
Exclusive access could not be obtained because the database is in use
Anyone know how to solve this problem?
Thanks
Li
View 45 Replies
View Related
Jun 15, 2007
I have a test database that is automatically restored from the live database each day at 2:30AM. I recently started receiving this message:
Exclusive access could not be obtained because the database is in use.
and the restore is not able to occur.
Any ideas on how I can prevent this from happening?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 30, 2004
I restored a full backup of db...then I use this script to backup log, using the stop at function:
Restore log db from disk='e:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQLBACKUPdb_tlog_200411300800.TRN' with
RECOVERY,STOPAT = 'Nov 30, 2004 1:00 AM'
when I run this script in Query Analyzer, I get:
Server: Msg 3101, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Exclusive access could not be obtained because the database is in use.
Server: Msg 3013, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
RESTORE LOG is terminating abnormally.
No other connections are present to the database except my connection through QA ...what can I do ?..please respond ASAP
thank you
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
Ive been playing with this for a few days and thought I might thow itout for seggestions.I have Several Queries that need counts returnedThe Queries are Mutually Exclusive meaning whatever Query they returnin first they cannot be included in the counts of any queries belowthem.This set of queries for exampleSelect ID From Customers where FIRST_NAME = 'Chris' (would return say150)Select ID From Customers where ST='OH' (This would retunr say 50, BUTRun alone it might return 70, however 20 of those were in the firstQuery so they arent to be retunred in this result set.The total for Bot Queries would be 200But If I reverse it like soSelect ID From Customers where ST='OH' (This now returns 70)Select ID From Customers where FIRST_NAME = 'Chris' (This now returns130)The total of course for BOT Queries is 200 but I dont need that total Ineed the total for EACH Query depending on its orderingWhat I need are the single counts depending on the order in which thequeries are runIt seems like a recursion problem, but It might go past 32 level so Icant use recursive SQL ( I dont think )I've thought of (or tried to think how to use Not In, Not Exist, etcbut still dosent come up with the results....)How Can I grab the counts for each Query ?Chris
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 4, 2006
Hello,
We currently use SQL Serv 2000 with an ERP application and VB applications.
Both system work with the same database & tables but the ERP application seems to put exclusive lock on all tables it needs during processes. So our VB applications are not able to read these data and we receive TIMEOUT error.
What can I do ?
thank you
Nico
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 11, 2007
Hi all. I have read and implemented the very helpful threads on backing up and restoring with user instance posted with MFriedlander. Thank you. However, during the rs.SqlRestore(srv) command I am getting the following error "Restore failed for Server '\.pipe4A1F91FF-F6FE-45 sqlquery'. "
"Exclusive access could not be obtained because the database is in use."
I have implemented the changedatabase method as described in that thread.
SqlConnection.ChangeDatabase("master")
right before the line
rs.SqlRestore(srv)
I do not use the default instance of sql express, but I do use an instance called 'test' for my app. Should my changedatabase method also refer to my sql instance?
I am running from VS 2005 debug (F5) when it fails and cannot think of anything that would be locking it. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you. Below is the full code of the restore.
Robert
Dim sqlconnection As SqlConnection = New SqlConnection(My.Settings.dbTestConnectionString)
sqlconnection.Open()
MsgBox(sqlconnection.Database.ToString())
Dim ServerConnection As ServerConnection = New ServerConnection(sqlconnection)
Dim srv As Server = New Server(ServerConnection)
'Declare a BackupDeviceItem by supplying the backup device file name in the constructor, and the type of device is a file.
Dim bdi As BackupDeviceItem
bdi = New BackupDeviceItem(txtRestoreFile.Text, DeviceType.File)
''Define a Restore object variable.
Dim rs As New Restore
'Set the NoRecovery property to true, so the transactions are not recovered.
rs.NoRecovery = True
rs.ReplaceDatabase = True
'Add the device that contains the full database backup to the Restore object.
rs.Devices.Add(bdi)
'don't know why the below norecovery is changed to false
rs.NoRecovery = False
'Specify the database name.
rs.Database = sqlconnection.Database.ToString()
sqlconnection.ChangeDatabase("master")
'Restore the full database backup with no recovery.
rs.SqlRestore(srv)
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 7, 2007
Hi everyone,
Hope somebody can help me on this.
I did a full BACKUP for two SQL databases using SQL Server Managament Studio. When trying to RESTORE the DBs, I get the following error:
"System.Data.SqlClient.SqlError: Exclusive access could not be obtained because the database is in use. (Microsoft.SqlServer.Smo)"
There are NO users using the application. These are DBs for the Portfolio Server 2007 application.
After exploring a little bit, I found that there are several "SLEEPING" processes with an "AWATING COMMAND" flag. The processes come from the Portfolio Server Application, maybe from previous sessions.
Can they be deleted? if so, would there be any serious consequences?
Thank you for your help on this.
Oscar E.
View 4 Replies
View Related
