When I open my Cube the default dimension on Rows is the dimension name that is first on the alphabetic list and on the columns it defaults to the time dimension.
I need to specify a specific dimension to be shown on rows and columns when the cube is viewed.
The analysis server is 2000 with SP3.
Thanks in Advance for the assistance
I need to show the dimensions of my model like columns in the result. I have this query
with
member [Measures].[Customer] as [Customers].[Customer].CURRENTMEMBER.Name
member [Measures].[UCs] as [UCs].[UC].CURRENTMEMBER.Name
member [Measures].[Order Type] as [Order Types].[Order Type].CURRENTMEMBER.Name
member [Measures].[UC Dates] as [UC Dates].[UC Date].CURRENTMEMBER.Name
[Code] .....
Hello,
I have a survey (30 questions) application in a SQL server db. The application uses several relational tables. The results are arranged so that each answer is on a seperate row:
user1 answer1user1 answer2user1 answer3user2 answer1user2 answer2user2 answer3
For statistical analysis I need to transfer the results to an Excel spreadsheet (for later use in SPSS). In the spreadsheet I need the results to appear so that each user will be on a single row with all of that user's answers on that single row (A column for each answer):
user1 answer1 answer2 answer3user2 answer1 answer2 answer3
How can this be done? How can all answers of a user appear on a single row
Thanx,Danny.
I managed to transpose rows into columns.
;WITH
ctePreAgg AS
(
select top 500 act_reference "ActivityRef",
row_number() over (partition by act_reference order by act_reference) as rowno,
t3.s_initials "Initials"
from mytablestuff
order by act_reference
[code]...
But what I would love to do next is take each of the above rows - and return the initials either in one column with all the nulls and duplicate values removed, separated by a comma ..
ref, initials
Ag-4xYS
Ag-6xYS,BL
Ap-1xKW
At-2x SAS,CW
At-3x SAS,CW
OR the above but using variable number of columns based on the maximum number of different initials for each row.this is not strictly required, but maybe neater for further work on the view
ref, init1,init2
Ag-4xYS
Ag-6xYS,BL
Ap-1xKW
At-2x SAS,CW
At-3x SAS,CW
I have a report which is a list of items and I display everything about the item. It is great. My report table in the layout tab is simple. Header,Detail,Footer. Each Item has 65 columns. The number of items (rows) vary upon what you want to see. Example data.
Item#, Description, CaseSalePrice, Cost, BottleSalePrice, Discount
123, Grenadine, 100.00, 75.00, 15.50, 2.00
456, Lime Juice, 120.00, 81.00, 17.25, 2.00
There could be 1 item or 4000 items.
What I want to see is.
Item # - 123, 456
Description - Grenadine, Lime Juice
CaseSalePrice - 100.00, 120.00
Cost - 75.00, 81.00
BottleSalePrice - 15.50, 17.25
Discount - 2.00, 2.00
What I am actually doing is running this the top example and saving to excel. Then copying the sheet. Creating a new sheet then doing a paste special transpose and this gives the users what they want to see.
I want to grab that table object in the report layout tab and twist it 90degrees so the header is on the left, detail is in the middle and the footer is on the right. It would be perfect.
The dynamic column need is really the problem here. I never know how many items will be in the report. They all have the same basic information like description and pricing.
I am all out of creative ideas, any help would be appreciated.
HiI have a table that currently has 466 columns and about 700,000records. Adding a new DEFAULT column to this table takes a long time.It it a lot faster to recreate the table with the new columns and thencopy all of the data across.As far as I am aware when you add a DEFAULT column the followinghappens:a) The column is added with a NULL propertyb) Each row is updated to be set to the DEFAULT valuec) The column is changed to NOT NULL.However, adding the column as NOT NULL with the DEFAULT seems to take alot longer than if I do steps a) - c) separately.When I say a long time, adding just a single DEFAULT column takesaround 6 hours. Surely it should not take this long?There is a trigger on this table but disabling this does not seem tomake much difference.Can anybody give me any advice on the use of DEFAULT columns please?When should they be used, benefits, disadvantages, alternatives etc.Also should it really take as long as it is taking or is there aproblem with my setup?If I am honest I can't see why DEFAULT columns should be used as thevalues could always be inserted explicitly via the applicationThanks in Advance.Paul
View 5 Replies View RelatedHello all,Does anybody know if it is possible to set the default value of afield to equal the concatenation of 2 other fields?I.E.Field 1 = 123Field 2 = 345Field 3 = (Field1 + Field2) = 123345This is easy enough to do using a stored procedure, but I'm trying touse the import tool and so need to do the concatenation by default.Many thanks,Drew.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi, I want to drop a column from a table with default constraint. It is giving me error..
------------------
Server: Msg 5074, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
The object 'DF__ACTIVITY___ROLLU__108B795B' is dependent on column 'ROLLUP_BGT_COST_FIXED'.
Server: Msg 4922, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN ROLLUP_BGT_COST_FIXED failed because one or more objects access this column.
-------------------------
Here is the drop statement
-----------
DROP STATISTICS ACTIVITY_BASELINE.ROLLUP_BGT_COST_FIXED
ALTER TABLE ACTIVITY_BASELINE DROP COLUMN ROLLUP_BGT_COST_FIXED;
------------------------
How can I first drop the constraint?
Hi I want to create a table with one column, which is a identitycolumn.Let's say like this:CREATE TABLE DefaultTable(N int identity(0,1))Then I want to fill this table with 15,000,000 records, so that I havea table with the numbers 0 to 14,999,999.How can I do this as fast as possible. A standard INSERT would take along time.(It can be a temp table or a table variable. I just need a list withnumbered 0 to 15,000,000)Thank you.Gidon
View 2 Replies View RelatedHi guys,
Is there a way to declare a default value of empty string '' for a varchar table column?
Thanks,Kevin
CREATE TABLE XYZ
(
ID int DEFAULT 5000,
NAME VARCHAR(100)
)
I have many tables that have many columns with default values
Is there a way to get a listing of
TAB_NAME, COL_NAME, Data_type, Default_Value
Are there any vices to using default constraints on all columns in your table.
For example an Int that defaults to 0
or a char or varchar that defaults to ''
I know that 0 and Null are not the same thing. But if your programs don't have the concept of NULL then you have to convert the NULL to zero.
So, DEFAULT CONSTRAINTS on every column. Is it good or Bad?
Thanks
Darin Clark
Howdy all,
I've run into an interesting scenario that I can't seem to resolve.
We have a table that we are using to create sequence ids. It's literally a table with a single field with the identity value turned on.
create table ident (seq_id int identity(1,1) primary key NOT NULL)
If I want to grab a new sequence id, I can execute
INSERT INTO
ident
DEFAULT VALUES
SELECT scope_identity() AS seq_id
All is well and good. However, now let's suppose that instead of just one, I'd like to get a range of values.
If the table had one other field in it, I could do the following
create table ident2 (seq_id int identity(1,1) primary key NOT NULL, placeholder char(1))
GO
;
WITH RECORDS AS
(
SELECT
CAST('A' as char(1)) AS col1
UNION ALL
SELECT
char(ascii(col1) + 1)
FROM
RECORDS
WHERE
col1 < 'C'
)
INSERT INTO
ident2
OUTPUT
INSERTED.seq_id
SELECT
NULL
FROM
RECORDS
Can this be done if there is only the identity column and if so, someone care to educate me?
Hi!
I want to merge in a Datawarehouse, data of "source databases"
I need to insert on destination inserted rows a default value, acording to the datasource of the rows.
Something like in the field <SOURCE> fill on correspondent ROW the value <DATASOURCE1>
the row data is filled with default DATASOURCE value.
in nowdays i can extract and load the data of sources but i know how i can do this inserts,
thx.
Howdy all,
I've run into an interesting scenario that I can't seem to resolve.
We have a table that we are using to create sequence ids. It's literally a table with a single field with the identity value turned on.
Code Snippet
create table ident (seq_id int identity(1,1) primary key NOT NULL)
If I want to grab a new sequence id, I can execute
Code Snippet
INSERT INTO
ident
DEFAULT VALUES
SELECT scope_identity() AS seq_id
All is well and good. However, now let's suppose that instead of just one, I'd like to get a range of values. If the table had one other field in it, I could do the following
Code Snippet
create table ident2 (seq_id int identity(1,1) primary key NOT NULL, placeholder char(1))
GO
;
WITH RECORDS AS
(
SELECT
CAST('A' as char(1)) AS col1
UNION ALL
SELECT
char(ascii(col1) + 1)
FROM
RECORDS
WHERE
col1 < 'C'
)
INSERT INTO
ident2
OUTPUT
INSERTED.seq_id
SELECT
NULL
FROM
RECORDS
Is there a way to do this if there is only the identity column and if so, someone care to educate me?
From a design perspective, all I can say is "it's not mine" but I do have to live with it, or at least my coworker has to live with it. I'm merely trying to prevent them from opening a cursor and calling the default values version 45M times and no, that's not an exageration.
I'm recreating many of my DBA scripts that no longer work in 2005 due to the rework of system tables. It's a risk I lived with knowing that someday the system tables would change. I'm now encountering collation problems, which I do not understand. I know how to fix the problem, but I don't know why the collation issues exist in the first place.
Run the following command.
Select * From sys.all_objects a JOIN master..spt_values b on a.type = b.type
You will receive the following error.
Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Line 1
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS_KS_WS" in the equal to operation.
Now run sp_help 'sys.all_objects' and look at the collation defintion for columns "type" and "type_desc". In my environment they have a collation of Latin1_General_CI_AS_KS_WS. This is different then the overall default collation of SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS, thus causing the error.
My question is why did Microsoft need to make this collation different for these columns?
Any ideas?
Thanks, Dave
i have a table and a column called req_id, i have it set as the primary key.. so if i just do SELECT * FROM table, shouldnt the rows returned be sorted by the order that the rows were inserted?
this database was improted from an access database.. when i did that in access it would return the rows in sorted order by the order the row was inserted.. but now in MS SQL, its not sorted in that order.. i can't really tell what type of order it's in
How can i enter Default Values of " " to all the columns of type characterof all the tables (excluding system tables) and Default Values of 0of all columns of type numbers. Excluding all primary key columns.Thank you
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have created a sample Database for the school project,
After executing the query below, the Date column is supposed to have the dates I have entered before,
However the dates shown are 1900.
Any idea why is this happening?
I appreciate your help.
Thank you.
Query:
Drop table AccountReceivable
GO
--BEGIN TRANSACTION
Create table AccountReceivable
(
AccountRecID int identity (1,1) not null,
PatientID int not null,
PresentCharges int default 0 not null,
PaymentMade money default 0 not null,
PreviousBalance money default 0 not null,
BalanceDue money default 0 not null,
LastPaymentDate datetime not null,
PresentDate datetime default GetDate() not null
)
GO
ALTER TABLE AccountReceivable ADD CONSTRAINT
PK_AccountRecID Primary Key (AccountRecID)
GO
ALTER TABLE AccountReceivable ADD CONSTRAINT
FK_PatientID_PatientID FOREIGN KEY (PatientID) REFERENCES PATIENT (PatientID)
GO
--COMMIT
--query to find delinquent accounts
--DATEDIFF (d, LastPaymentDate, PresentDate)
--Populate the Accounts Table
DELETE AccountReceivable
GO
INSERT AccountReceivable (PatientID,PresentCharges,PaymentMade,PreviousBalance,BalanceDue,LastPaymentDate,PresentDate )
VALUES (913235,451.34,50,0,401.34,4/7/2006,DEFAULT)
GO
INSERT AccountReceivable (PatientID,PresentCharges,PaymentMade,PreviousBalance,BalanceDue,LastPaymentDate,PresentDate)
VALUES (918035,109,109,0,0,3/6/2006,DEFAULT)
GO
INSERT AccountReceivable (PatientID,PresentCharges,PaymentMade,PreviousBalance,BalanceDue,LastPaymentDate,PresentDate)
VALUES (914235,279,89,0,190,5/9/2005,5/9/2005)
GO
INSERT AccountReceivable (PatientID,PresentCharges,PaymentMade,PreviousBalance,BalanceDue,LastPaymentDate,PresentDate)
VALUES (914235,0,90,190,100,5/9/2005,DEFAULT)
GO
INSERT AccountReceivable (PatientID,PresentCharges,PaymentMade,PreviousBalance,BalanceDue,LastPaymentDate,PresentDate)
VALUES (912224,67.90,67.90,0,0,2/2/2006,DEFAULT)
GO
INSERT AccountReceivable (PatientID,PresentCharges,PaymentMade,PreviousBalance,BalanceDue,LastPaymentDate,PresentDate)
VALUES (900814,678.32,78.32,0,600,4/6/2006,4/6/2006)
GO
INSERT AccountReceivable (PatientID,PresentCharges,PaymentMade,PreviousBalance,BalanceDue,LastPaymentDate,PresentDate)
VALUES (900814,0,500,600,100,4/6/2006,4/16/2006)
GO
INSERT AccountReceivable (PatientID,PresentCharges,PaymentMade,PreviousBalance,BalanceDue,LastPaymentDate,PresentDate)
VALUES (900814,0,100,100,0,4/16/2006,DEFAULT)
GO
INSERT AccountReceivable (PatientID,PresentCharges,PaymentMade,PreviousBalance,BalanceDue,LastPaymentDate,PresentDate)
VALUES (913010,203,0,100,303,2/6/2006,DEFAULT)
GO
INSERT AccountReceivable (PatientID,PresentCharges,PaymentMade,PreviousBalance,BalanceDue,LastPaymentDate,PresentDate)
VALUES (913010,0,80,303,223,8/3/2006,DEFAULT)
GO
INSERT AccountReceivable (PatientID,PresentCharges,PaymentMade,PreviousBalance,BalanceDue,LastPaymentDate,PresentDate)
VALUES (913230,1030.89,1030.89,0,0,4/16/2006,DEFAULT)
GO
INSERT AccountReceivable (PatientID,PresentCharges,PaymentMade,PreviousBalance,BalanceDue,LastPaymentDate,PresentDate)
VALUES (918035,78,60,0,18,7/1/2006,DEFAULT)
GO
INSERT AccountReceivable (PatientID,PresentCharges,PaymentMade,PreviousBalance,BalanceDue,LastPaymentDate,PresentDate)
VALUES (941235,902,502,0,400,8/15/2006,DEFAULT)
GO
INSERT AccountReceivable (PatientID,PresentCharges,PaymentMade,PreviousBalance,BalanceDue,LastPaymentDate,PresentDate)
VALUES (941235,0,200,400,200,8/15/2006,DEFAULT)
GO
INSERT AccountReceivable (PatientID,PresentCharges,PaymentMade,PreviousBalance,BalanceDue,LastPaymentDate,PresentDate)
VALUES (952235,134,24,0,110,4/18/2006,DEFAULT)
GO
INSERT AccountReceivable (PatientID,PresentCharges,PaymentMade,PreviousBalance,BalanceDue,LastPaymentDate,PresentDate)
VALUES (952235,0,20,110,90,4/18/2006,DEFAULT)
GO
INSERT AccountReceivable (PatientID,PresentCharges,PaymentMade,PreviousBalance,BalanceDue,LastPaymentDate,PresentDate)
VALUES (921635,257.87,57.87,0,200,5/27/2006,DEFAULT)
GO
INSERT AccountReceivable (PatientID,PresentCharges,PaymentMade,PreviousBalance,BalanceDue,LastPaymentDate,PresentDate)
VALUES (921635,0,20,200,180,6/27/2006,DEFAULT)
GO
INSERT AccountReceivable (PatientID,PresentCharges,PaymentMade,PreviousBalance,BalanceDue,LastPaymentDate,PresentDate)
VALUES (915235,1204,200,0,1004,3/15/2006,DEFAULT)
GO
INSERT AccountReceivable (PatientID,PresentCharges,PaymentMade,PreviousBalance,BalanceDue,LastPaymentDate,PresentDate)
VALUES (915235,0,100,1004,904,4/27/2006,DEFAULT)
GO
INSERT AccountReceivable (PatientID,PresentCharges,PaymentMade,PreviousBalance,BalanceDue,LastPaymentDate,PresentDate)
VALUES (900035,578,178,0,400,7/10/2006,DEFAULT)
GO
INSERT AccountReceivable (PatientID,PresentCharges,PaymentMade,PreviousBalance,BalanceDue,LastPaymentDate,PresentDate)
VALUES (900035,0,100,400,300,7/19/2006,DEFAULT)
GO
INSERT AccountReceivable (PatientID,PresentCharges,PaymentMade,PreviousBalance,BalanceDue,LastPaymentDate,PresentDate)
VALUES (913241,157,0,0,157,5/12/2006,DEFAULT)
GO
INSERT AccountReceivable (PatientID,PresentCharges,PaymentMade,PreviousBalance,BalanceDue,LastPaymentDate,PresentDate)
VALUES (913241,0,57,157,100,5/16/2006,DEFAULT)
GO
--sample query
select PatientID,PresentCharges,LastPAymentDate,PresentDate from AccountReceivable
GO
--result
PatientID PresentCharges LastPaymentDate PresentDate
----------- -------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
913235 451 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000 2006-09-15 12:54:55.297
918035 109 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000 2006-09-15 12:54:55.297
914235 279 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000
914235 0 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000 2006-09-15 12:54:55.297
912224 67 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000 2006-09-15 12:54:55.297
900814 678 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000
900814 0 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000
900814 0 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000 2006-09-15 12:54:55.313
913010 203 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000 2006-09-15 12:54:55.313
913010 0 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000 2006-09-15 12:54:55.313
913230 1030 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000 2006-09-15 12:54:55.313
918035 78 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000 2006-09-15 12:54:55.313
941235 902 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000 2006-09-15 12:54:55.327
941235 0 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000 2006-09-15 12:54:55.327
952235 134 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000 2006-09-15 12:54:55.327
952235 0 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000 2006-09-15 12:54:55.327
921635 257 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000 2006-09-15 12:54:55.327
921635 0 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000 2006-09-15 12:54:55.327
915235 1204 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000 2006-09-15 12:54:55.327
915235 0 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000 2006-09-15 12:54:55.327
900035 578 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000 2006-09-15 12:54:55.343
900035 0 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000 2006-09-15 12:54:55.343
913241 157 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000 2006-09-15 12:54:55.343
913241 0 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000 2006-09-15 12:54:55.343
(24 row(s) affected)
I am working on a project that is creating a new application, my area of the project being the migration of data from the old application database, transforming it, and populating the new database.
The transformations to the old data are done in a staging database.
At the end of the process, the staging database ends up with a lot of new applications tables, populated with the migrated legacy data.
We need to move these tables from the staging database to (initially) our test databases, but ultimately what will be the live database.
We have tried using the "Transfer SQL Server Objects Task" in SSIS, but have ran into a problem that a lot of the database tables have default values for columns.
These default values are not brought over.
Example. Tables contain a "GUID" field, which has a default of value of newid()
Right clicking and the table generating the CREATE script generates
[GUID] [uniqueidentifier] ROWGUIDCOL NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_tbCRM_Client_GUID] DEFAULT (newid()),
However, the Transfer objects task does not create this default of newid()
Examining the SQL generated by the Import / Export Wizard when investigating this shows that the wizard generates this column as
[GUID] uniqueidentifier NOT NULL
and the column default value is lost.
Is there something i should be setting somewhere to force SSIS to bring these column definitions over correctly?
IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT TOP 1 1 FROM dbo.syscolumns WHERE id = OBJECT_ID(N'dbo.Employee) and name = 'DoNotCall')
BEGIN
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Employee] ADD [DoNotCall] bit not null Constraint DoNot_Call_Default DEFAULT 0
IF ( @@ERROR <> 0 )
GOTO QuitWithRollback
END
It just takes a LOT of time in SQL Server Management studio. I have to cancel the query and cancelling takes a whole lot time. I am using SQL Server 2008.
hi,I'm building a multi-lingual website In my database tables I have, in some of them, a column with the Language, because some of the columns depend on what language the user wants to see the site.My question is: what is better? have that column and consequently two row (for two languages) with repeated column information? or have two column within a row with the language specification?e.g. table: id, description, price(1) With language:id,description, price, language='EX' id,description, price, language='EN' vs.(2) id, descriptionEN,descriptionEX,price if I have 500 products in 1 whould result in 1000 entriesin 2 just 500 results can anyone tell me a diference/advantage between the two approachs?thanks in advance.
View 1 Replies View Relatedis it possible to write a query so that we can have all rows of one column in a single columnTIA
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am building a calendar table for the most reason four weeks activitis and I have had a temp table data in table A (See my attached file) and I want to
make it as the format in table B as final. How to convert it? Please help!
Thank you!
Suin
I am using SQL 2008. I have a database called ISCmetrics and a table called Meeting, the table meeting has 5 columns id
( int),TEAMNAME (varchar),DATECOMPLETE (varchar),STATUSNAME (varchar),STATUSLEVEL (varchar)
We have around 20 different team names , and every team enters data into the database every day, and we have around 7 Different STATUSNAME they are always the same , the STATUSLEVEL is always a 1 or a 0 , so TEAMA enters a value every day for each of the 7 STATUSNAME, and the value is either a 1 or a 0 .
The output for a Select * from ISCMetricslooks like this
id TEAMNAME DATECOMPLETE STATUSNAME STATUSLEVEL
1 TeamA 20131022 STATCONTACT 1
2 TeamA 20131022 STATACTION 1
3 TeamA 20131022 STATABC 1
4 TeamB 20131022 STATCONTACT 1
5 TeamB 20131022 STATCTION 0
6 TeamB 20131022 STATABC 1
7 TeamA 20131021 STATCONTACT 0
8 TeamA 20131021 STATACTION 1
9 TeamA 20131021 STATABC 0
10 TeamB 20131021 STATCONTACT 1
11 TeamB 20131021 STATACTION 1
12 TeamB 20131021 STATABC 1
What i am trying to achieve is this, i want the teams in one column then a column for each of the dates , and then sum of the STATUSLEVEL in each row as shown below for the day and team .....
TEAMNAME 20131022 20131021
TeamA 3 1
TeamB 2 3
hello all,
i am trying to create a view from a table that will keep track of the time between each stage of tasks given. take a look at the data below:
progressID taskIDstage status theDate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1407525 1091657In Progress Logged 2006-11-16 10:00:24.000
1407526 1091657 In Progress Inprogress 2006-11-16 12:08:59.036
1407214 1091657In Progress Resolved 2006-11-16 14:15:48.000
1407220 1091657Closed Solved 2006-11-16 14:36:05.000
i would like to be able to have just one row per task ID showing the difference between the stages, as shown below . only the 2nd column is a date, the rest are are hours (datediff) between the stage and its preceeding stage :
taskID Logged InProgress Resolved Solved
1091657 2006-11-16 10:00:24.000 2.08 2.07 0.21
is it possible to achieve such a transformation using views and a number of select statements (i.e no dts)? all assistance will be highly appreciated.
regards,
ptah
Afternoon
I am trying to write a query that will return the columns: year/ month, each status type (unknown how many types there are)
Each row is a different join year/ month
Each cell has the count of users that joined in that rows year/ month and currently have the status of the column.
At the moment I have the following query:
SELECT [remortgage-status].status, COUNT(1) AS CountTotal, YEAR([remortgage-log].datetime) AS Year, MONTH([remortgage-log].datetime) AS month FROM [remortgage-status] INNER JOIN [remortgage-log] ON [remortgage-status].clientid = [remortgage-log].clientid WHERE ([remortgage-log].action = N'Joined') GROUP BY [remortgage-status].status, YEAR([remortgage-log].datetime), MONTH([remortgage-log].datetime)
The problem is that each different status is a new row rather than each status being a column.
What do I need to do to correct this? - I dont know all the different possible statuses at this point
Hi,
I've a table called months with one column month. The result set will be
month
=====
Jan
Feb
Mar
...
Now i want to convert those values as rows. Means,
Jan Feb Mar
===========
Suggest me a solution for the above problem.
Thanks
Somu
I know this is a self join, but I can't remember exactly how it goes.Could someone help me out?create table A{int idA,varchar(30) dataA}create table B{int idB,varchar(30) dataB}create table A_B{int idA references A(idA),int idB references B(idB)}insert into A values(1, "foobar")insert into A values(2, "barfoo")insert into B values(1, "a")insert into B values(2, "b")insert into B values(3, "c")insert into B values(4, "d")insert into B values(5, "e")insert into B values(6, "f")insert into B values(7, "g")insert into B values(8, "h")insert into A_B values (1, 1)insert into A_B values (1, 2)insert into A_B values (1, 3)insert into A_B values (1, 4)desired resultsfoobar a b c dThanks,-- Rick
View 9 Replies View RelatedLets say I have the following rows..
ID,Net,Gross,Total
1 ,25.00,55.00,100.00
2,35.00,65.00,250.00
What would be the best way to do this...
ID, Description, Value
1, Net, 25.00
1, Gross,55.00
1, Total, 100,00
2, Net 35,00
I was using the multicast and doing a bunch of derived columns but it seems like there should be a eaiser way to do this.
Any help would be appreciated, thanks.
Mardo
Hi
i have rows as follows
1 col1 value1
1 col2 value2
1 col3 value3
2 col1 value4
2 col2 value5
2 col3 value6
need result as
id col1 col2 col3
1 value1 value2 value3
2 value4 value5 value6
How to achieve this?
I am trying to achieve this using Pivot, but it is aggregating.
I have a large amount of data in an XML file. The file is very simple. Off of the root node are category nodes and each category node has many detail nodes. The detail node consist of the node name and the node value. Rather than map the detail to matching named fields in a single record, I would like to send the detail node data to individual data records where the category code, node name and node value are the only fields in the record. For example,
Starting with
<Category>
<Code>001</Code
<Details>
<DetailCode123>75.87</DetailCode123>
<DetailCode728>12.98</DetailCode728>
<DetailCode387>55.72</DetailCode387>
</Details>
</Category>
I want to be able to pick up the 001 code for the category and then transform the above data into 3 separate table records with the following fields (CatCode, DetailCodeName, DetailValue).
001, DetailCode123, 75.84
001, DetailCode728, 12.98
001, DetailCode387, 5572
Does this sort of transform exist? If not, I will have generate my own parsing script. Thought it was worth asking before doing the additional work.
Thanks
I am converting rows into columns :
Schedule_S1 contains more than 1 rows with different FROM_DATE and TO_DATE
The query should merge 2 rows into 1 row with 2 different FROM_DATE AND TO_DATE
The following query works fine when there are more than 1 records. When there is only 1 record, it should still return the record (with FROM_DATE_2 and TO_DATE_2 as nulls). Thanks for any help.
SELECT
ml1.P_ID,
ml1.S_ID,
ml1.CURRENT_DAY,
ml1.FROM_DATE AS "FROM_DATE_1",
ml1.TO_DATE AS "TO_DATE_1",
ml2.FROM_DATE AS "FROM_DATE_2",
ml2.TO_DATE AS "TO_DATE_2"
FROM
Schedule_S1 ml1 JOIN
Schedule_S1 ml2 ON
ml2.FROM_DATE > ml1.FROM_DATE
WHERE
ml1.P_ID = 59014 AND
ml1.S_ID = 25691 AND
ml1.CURRENT_DAY = 3 AND
ml2.P_ID = 59014 AND
ml2.S_ID = 25691 AND
ml2.CURRENT_DAY = 3
ORDER BY
ml1.FROM_DATE