Help With JOINS In Stored Procedures
Mar 17, 2006
I am making a stored procedure, and I need to set some variables based on the results of a JOIN statement.
If I something like:
SELECT table.field, table.field2 FROM table INNER JOIN table2 ON table.field = string
How could I get the results and set them in variables?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
GKC
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jan 1, 2005
First, does anyone know any good SQL Server sites with articles and whatnot on query design, etc. Not so much basic "How to get data out of your table", but more complex topics like conditional stored procedures, working with triggers, etc. The MSDN is helpful but I often have trouble understanding what's going on.
And second, any pointers (or links) on how I can go about having a stored procedure query a pair of product tables to get information to display in my shopping cart? I've got:
Cart Items StdProducts CustomProducts
----------- ------------- -----------------
partID stdpartID custompartID
IsCustom (Bit)
description description
So depending on if the 'IsCustom' field is True or False, I want to join the [cartitems].[partID] to either the [StdProducts].[stdpartID] or the [CustomProducts].[custompartID] to get the description and other information.
Eventually, I'll probably need to branch this type of procedure out even further (not just either/or scenario) to include the option of pointing to 6-12 different child tables depending on criteria within the parent table for a different scenario. Depending on performance, I could either hard code in the various child tables or have another table containing the table names and the appropriate key that would indicate which table to use.
Hopefully that made some sense, since I'm not entirely positive how to go about this type of thing or what you would call whatever I'm trying to do (and thus what I would be searching for).
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 17, 2007
I have a multiple table dataset that needs to be returned, with at least 5 joins, some inner, some left outer.
Currently, this is done via a parameterized stored prodedure, which is used fairly frequently. The parameters only affect the where clause, not the joins.
Would it be better to create the view with the joins already done, then pass in the parameters with the stored procedure? Which is better for overall performance? Which is better for quicker response times to the calling asp.net application?
Thanks in advance,
Leah
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
I want to know the differences between SQL Server 2000 storedprocedures and oracle stored procedures? Do they have differentsyntax? The concept should be the same that the stored proceduresexecute in the database server with better performance?Please advise good references for Oracle stored procedures also.thanks!!
View 11 Replies
View Related
Sep 30, 2006
Hi,
This Might be a really simple thing, however we have just installed SQL server 2005 on a new server, and are having difficulties with the set up of the Store Procedures. Every time we try to modify an existing stored procedure it attempts to save it as an SQL file, unlike in 2000 where it saved it as part of the database itself.
Thank you in advance for any help on this matter
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 6, 2007
Using SQL 2005, SP2. All of a sudden, whenever I create any stored procedures in the master database, they get created as system stored procedures. Doesn't matter what I name them, and what they do.
For example, even this simple little guy:
CREATE PROCEDURE BOB
AS
PRINT 'BOB'
GO
Gets created as a system stored procedure.
Any ideas what would cause that and/or how to fix it?
Thanks,
Jason
View 16 Replies
View Related
Feb 20, 2008
Iam working with a query where iam joining different fields from two tables and this is working well
SELECT Ind.Industry_Name,Com.Company_Name,Com.Company_Address FROM Industry AS Ind INNER JOIN Company AS Com INNER JOIN ON Ind.Ind_ID_PK = Com.Ind_ID_FK
Here iam getting the values depending on the Ids of both the tables.
But now i want to join three different tables..can i use this Query
SELECT Ind.Industry_Name,Com.Company_Name,Com.Company_Address,Pla.Plant_Name,Pla.Created_On FROM Industry AS Ind INNER JOIN Company AS Com INNER JOIN Plant AS Pla ON Ind.Ind_ID_PK = Com.Ind_ID_FK and Ind.Ind_ID_PK = Pla.Ind_ID_FKIam getting an error like :
Incorrect syntax near 'Ind_ID_FK'. i.e here Com.Ind_ID_FK .
I checked by removing and Ind.Ind_ID_PK = Pla.Ind_ID_FK but iam getting same error.
Please help me... Its Urgent..
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 18, 2008
I need help from you guru's.
I have this sp which normailzes some data to a temp table. I need to extend the "return results" select statement to join and get more data.
So I add task_charge_type to the select and created 3 joins to get it all together.
I can execute the alter sp command with no errors; however when I try to execute the sp I get the following errors:
Msg 209, Level 16, State 1, Procedure sp_psactualsbyweek, Line 69
Ambiguous column name 'PROJ_NAME'.
Msg 209, Level 16, State 1, Procedure sp_psactualsbyweek, Line 69
Ambiguous column name 'PROJ_NAME'.
set ANSI_NULLS ON
set QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
go
-- sp_psactualsbyweek.sql
--
-- This stored procedure generates a report of the actual hours worked by a
-- resource by project and task for a specific date range from the table
-- MSP_WEB_WORK.
ALTER procedure [dbo].[sp_psactualsbyweek]
-- date range variables
@startdate datetime,
@enddate datetime
as
-- cursor variables
declare @res_name nvarchar(510)
declare @proj_name nvarchar(510)
declare @task_name nvarchar(510)
declare @start datetime
declare @finish datetime
declare @value decimal(25,6)
declare @days int
declare @count int
declare @date datetime
-- temp table to hold normalized data
create table #actuals_data (
RES_NAME nvarchar(510),
PROJ_NAME nvarchar(510),
TASK_NAME nvarchar(510),
WORK_DAY datetime,
HOURS decimal(25,6) )
-- cursor to convert denormalized data
declare actuals_csr cursor for
SELECT DISTINCTr.RES_NAME,
p.PROJ_NAME,
a.TASK_NAME,
w.WWORK_START,
w.WWORK_FINISH,
w.WWORK_VALUE
FROMMSP_WEB_RESOURCES AS r
INNER JOINMSP_WEB_ASSIGNMENTS AS a ON a.WRES_ID = r.WRES_ID
INNER JOINMSP_WEB_WORK AS w ON w.WASSN_ID = a.WASSN_ID
INNER JOINMSP_WEB_PROJECTS AS p ON p.WPROJ_ID = a.WPROJ_ID
wherew.WWORK_TYPE = 1 -- actual work
and((w.WWORK_START between @startdate and @enddate) or (w.WWORK_FINISH between @startdate and @enddate))
order by 1, 2, 3, 4
open actuals_csr
fetch next from actuals_csr into @res_name, @proj_name, @task_name, @start, @finish, @value
while @@fetch_status = 0
begin
select @days = DATEDIFF(day, @start, @finish) + 1
select @count = 0
while @count < @days
begin
select @date = DATEADD(day ,@count, @start)
insert into #actuals_data values( @res_name, @proj_name, @task_name, @date, ((@value/1000)/60) )
select @count = @count + 1
end
fetch next from actuals_csr into @res_name, @proj_name, @task_name, @start, @finish, @value
end
close actuals_csr
deallocate actuals_csr
-- return results
select RES_NAME,
PROJ_NAME,
Task_Name,
Task_Charge_Type = case when pe.ProjectEnterpriseOutlineCode30ID = 530 Then 'Expensed'
when pe.ProjectEnterpriseOutlineCode30ID = 529 and te.TaskEnterpriseOutlineCode30ID = 527 Then 'Capital' end,
Work_Day,
sum(HOURS) as 'TOTAL HOURS'
from #actuals_data
INNER JOINMSP_WEB_PROJECTS AS p on #actuals_data.PROJ_NAME = p.PROJ_NAME
INNER JOINMSP_VIEW_PROJ_PROJECTS_ENT AS pe ON pe.WPROJ_ID = p.WPROJ_ID
INNER JOINMSP_VIEW_PROJ_TASKS_ENT AS te ON te.WPROJ_ID = pe.WPROJ_ID
where WORK_DAY between @startdate and @enddate
group by RES_NAME, PROJ_NAME, Task_Name, Work_Day
order by res_name
drop table #actuals_data
--Msg 209, Level 16, State 1, Procedure sp_psactualsbyweek, Line 69
--Ambiguous column name 'PROJ_NAME'.
--Msg 209, Level 16, State 1, Procedure sp_psactualsbyweek, Line 69
--Ambiguous column name 'PROJ_NAME'.
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 18, 2007
This example is working:
Declare @startRowIndex INT; set @startRowIndex = (@PagerIndex * @ShowMembers); With BattleMembers as ( SELECT TOP 20 ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY LastActivityDate DESC) AS Row, UserId, UserName FROM aspnet_Users) SELECT UserId, UserName FROM BattleMembers WHERE Row between @startRowIndex and @startRowIndex+@ShowMembersEND
and this one doesn't work:USE [xx]GOSET ANSI_NULLS ONGOSET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ONGOALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[battle_Paging]@PagerIndex INT,@ShowMembers INT ASBEGINDeclare @startRowIndex INT; set @startRowIndex = (@PagerIndex * @ShowMembers); With BattleMembers as ( SELECT TOP 20 ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY aspnet_Users.LastActivityDate DESC) AS Row, aspnet_Users.UserId, aspnet_Users.UserName, mb_personal.Avatar FROM aspnet_Users LEFT JOIN mb_personal ON (mb_personal.UserID=aspnet_Users.UserId) SELECT UserId, UserName, Avatar FROM BattleMembers WHERE Row between @startRowIndex and @startRowIndex+@ShowMembersEND
Error:Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure battle_Paging, Line 18Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'SELECT'.
I try to join in the table mb_personal here. Some help would be very appreciated! Thanks.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 9, 2005
I have a database of news articles and i have a stored procedure that basically pulls one from the database based on an ID number. The author (Press Contact) and publication are stored as just ID numbers and pulled in via JOINs.
SELECT Articles.date_published, Articles.headline, Publication.press_contact,
Publication.pub_name, Articles.body
FROM Articles
LEFT OUTER JOIN
PressContact ON PressContact.press_id = Articles.press_id
LEFT OUTER JOIN
Publication ON Publication.publication_id = Articles.publication_id
WHERE (Articles.id = @ID)
Everything works great in this setup. However, we've recently added a press_id2 field to the articles table to be able to store a 2nd press contact. So now I need my stored procedure to pull out both press contact names and I'm not sure the best way to do that.
I tried to JOIN the PressContact table a 2nd time on PressContact.press_id = Articles.press_id2 but that didn't seem to work.
Can anyone give me any suggestions?
Thanks in advance.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 22, 2008
Have a situation where I need to check 100+ columns in the dataflow against lookup values to make sure all values are valid, and wanted to take a poll. Would it be better to
1) load the data into a working table and use traditional stored procedure (either NOT IN or LEFT OUTER JOIN where x is null) in order to weed out my bad values against my lookup table.....example
SELECT a.Col1
b.Col2
FROM Table1 a
LEFT OUTER JOIN Table2 b
ON (a.JoinCol = b.JoinCol)
WHERE b.JoinCol IS NULL
This results in poor performance b/c my temp work table is not really optimized for joins over to the lookup tables & I have so many columns that I don't really want to add all these indexes - my thoughts were that the index builds would take longer than the table scans.
OR
2) Use a huge number of lookup transforms in my data flow and keep it all in SSIS.
#1 is easier to maintain (my opinion) for future purposes but slower b/c I don't want to deal with indexes on the work table b/c it will be highly volatile. So - less cumbersome but slower
#2 will be more difficult to maintain b/c of the sheer # of lookups (since I can't change the SQL statement @ run time I have to put them all in separate lookups). Probably will run faster though b/c I won't have to deal with the transfer of the data to the db and also will avoid the table scans from #1. So - more cumbersome but faster.
What do others think? Or is there a better way?
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 16, 2007
I have a stored procedure using UNION joins on three SQL queries.
Sadly, I'm only now learning how to use Stored Procedures, so if this is a really dumb question, please forgive me. I'm not used to big UNION statements like this either... usually I'm just programming websites to serve information out pretty simply :)
I need to return one result set, sorted by date... one complete result per day. eg: 5/15/2007 | XX | XX | XX | XX | XX | XX |5/16/2007 | XX | XX | XX | XX | XX | XX |5/17/2007 | XX | XX | XX | XX | XX | XX |
Currently, when I run the query, I'm getting three separate date values for each date...
eg:5/15/2007 | XX | XX | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |5/15/2007 | 00 | 00 | XX | XX | 00 | 00 |5/15/2007 | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 | XX | XX |5/16/2007 | XX | XX | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |5/16/2007 | 00 | 00 | XX | XX | 00 | 00 |5/16/2007 | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 | XX | XX |etc
How do I fix this? I've looked through my query ad naseum and don't see anything that sets me off as "wrong".
Here is the stored procedure if you can help. I'd really really love the help!
C R E A T E P R O C E D U R E sp_ApptActivityDate
(@strWHERE as varchar(500), @strWHERECANCELED as varchar(500))
as
exec ('SELECT [date] AS Date, SUM(length) AS TotalSlots, COUNT(cast(substring(appointUniqueKey, 1, 1) AS decimal)) AS TotalAppts, SUM(length * 5) / 60 AS TotalSlotHours, 0 AS TotalActiveSlots, 0 AS TotalActiveAppts, 0 AS TotalActiveSlotHours, 0 AS totalCancelSlots, 0 AS TotalCancelAppts, 0 AS TotalCancelSlotHoursFROM dbo.vw_ALL_ApptActivity ' + @strWHERE + '
UNIONSELECT [date] as DATE, 0 AS TotalSlots, 0 AS TotalAppts, 0 AS TotalSlotHours, SUM(length) AS TotalActiveSlots, COUNT(cast(substring(appointuniquekey, 1, 1) AS decimal)) AS TotalActiveAppts, SUM(length * 5) / 60 AS TotalActiveSlotHours, 0 AS totalCancelSlots, 0 AS TotalCancelAppts, 0 AS TotalCancelSlotHoursFROM dbo.vw_Active_ApptActivity' + @strWHERE + '
UNIONSELECT [date] as DATE, 0 AS TotalSlots, 0 AS TotalAppts, 0 AS TotalSlotHours, 0 AS TotalActiveSlots, 0 AS TotalActiveAppts, 0 AS TotalActiveSlotHours, SUM(length) AS totalCancelSlots, COUNT(cast(substring(AppointUniqueKey, 1, 1) AS decimal)) AS TotalCancelAppts, SUM(length * 5) / 60 AS TotalCancelSlotHoursFROM dbo.vw_CANCELED_ApptActivity ' + @strWHERECANCELED + '
ORDER BY dbo.vw_ALL_ApptActivity.[Date] ' )GO
View 12 Replies
View Related
Apr 29, 2008
How do I search for and print all stored procedure names in a particular database? I can use the following query to search and print out all table names in a database. I just need to figure out how to modify the code below to search for stored procedure names. Can anyone help me out?
SELECT TABLE_SCHEMA + '.' + TABLE_NAME
FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES
WHERE TABLE_TYPE = 'BASE TABLE'
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 13, 2007
Seems like I'm stealing all the threads here, : But I need to learn :) I have a StoredProcedure that needs to return values that other StoredProcedures return.Rather than have my DataAccess layer access the DB multiple times, I would like to call One stored Procedure, and have that stored procedure call the others to get the information I need. I think this way would be more efficient than accessing the DB multiple times. One of my SP is:SELECT I.ItemDetailID, I.ItemDetailStatusID, I.ItemDetailTypeID, I.Archived, I.Expired, I.ExpireDate, I.Deleted, S.Name AS 'StatusName', S.ItemDetailStatusID, S.InProgress as 'StatusInProgress', S.Color AS 'StatusColor',T.[Name] AS 'TypeName', T.Prefix, T.Name AS 'ItemDetailTypeName', T.ItemDetailTypeID FROM [Item].ItemDetails I INNER JOIN Item.ItemDetailStatus S ON I.ItemDetailStatusID = S.ItemDetailStatusID INNER JOIN [Item].ItemDetailTypes T ON I.ItemDetailTypeID = T.ItemDetailTypeID However, I already have StoredProcedures that return the exact same data from the ItemDetailStatus table and ItemDetailTypes table.Would it be better to do it above, and have more code to change when a new column/field is added, or more checks, or do something like:(This is not propper SQL) SELECT I.ItemDetailID, I.ItemDetailStatusID, I.ItemDetailTypeID, I.Archived, I.Expired, I.ExpireDate, I.Deleted, EXEC [Item].ItemDetailStatusInfo I.ItemDetailStatusID, EXEC [Item].ItemDetailTypeInfo I.ItemDetailTypeID FROM [Item].ItemDetails IOr something like that... Any thoughts?
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 13, 2008
Greetings:
I have MSSQL 2005. On earlier versions of MSSQL saving a stored procedure wasn't a confusing action. However, every time I try to save my completed stored procedure (parsed successfully ) I'm prompted to save it as a query on the hard drive.
How do I cause the 'Save' action to add the new stored procedure to my database's list of stored procedures?
Thanks!
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2006
We recently upgraded to SQL Server 2005. We had several stored procedures in the master database and, rather than completely rewriting a lot of code, we just recreated these stored procedures in the new master database.
For some reason, some of these stored procedures are getting stored as "System Stored Procedures" rather than just as "Stored Procedures". Queries to sys.Objects and sys.Procedures shows that these procs are being saved with the is_ms_shipped field set to 1, even though they obviously were not shipped with the product.
I can't update the sys.Objects or sys.Procedures views in 2005.
What effect will this flag (is_ms_shipped = 1) have on my stored procedures?
Can I move these out of "System Stored Procedures" and into "Stored Procedures"?
Thanks!
View 24 Replies
View Related
Apr 23, 2008
Hello friends......How are you ? I want to ask you all that how can I do the following ?
I want to now that how many ways are there to do this ?
How can I call one or more stored procedures into perticular one Stored Proc ? in MS SQL Server 2000/05.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 26, 2008
Hello
I'm start to work with SSIS.
We have a lot (many hundreds) of old (SQL Server2000) procedures on SQL 2005.
Most of the Stored Procedures ends with the following commands:
SET @SQLSTRING = 'SELECT * INTO ' + @OutputTableName + ' FROM #RESULTTABLE'
EXEC @RETVAL = sp_executeSQL @SQLSTRING
How can I use SSIS to move the complete #RESULTTABLE to Excel or to a Flat File? (e.g. as a *.csv -File)
I found a way but I think i'ts only a workaround:
1. Write the #Resulttable to DB (changed Prozedure)
2. create data flow task (ole DB Source - Data Conversion - Excel Destination)
Does anyone know a better way to transfer the #RESULTTABLE to Excel or Flat file?
Thanks for an early Answer
Chaepp
View 9 Replies
View Related
Nov 3, 2000
We find that a delete command on a table where the rows to be deleted involve an inner join between the table and a view formed with an outer join sometimes works, sometimes gives error 625.
If the delete is recoded to use the join key word instead of the = sign
then it alway gives error 4425.
625 21 0 Could not retrieve row from logical page %S_PGID by RID because the entry in the offset table (%d) for that RID (%d) is less than or equal to 0. 1033
4425 16 0 Cannot specify outer join operators in a query containing joined tables. View '%.*ls' contains outer join operators.
The delete with a correleted sub query instead of a join works.
Error 4425 text would imply that joins with view formed by outer joins should be avoided.
Any ideas on the principles involved here.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 16, 2007
Hi,
Do you know how to write stored procedures inside another stored procedure in MS SQL.
Create procedure spMyProc inputData varchar(50)
AS
----- some logical
procedure spMyProc inputInsideData varchar(10)
AS
--- some logical
--- go
-------
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 8, 2008
I am writing a set of store procedures (around 30), most of them require the same basic logic to get an ID, I was thinking to add this logic into an stored procedure.
The question is: Would calling an stored procedure from within an stored procedure affect performance? I mean, would it need to create a separate db connection? am I better off copying and pasting the logic into all the store procedures (in terms of performance)?
Thanks in advance
John
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 1, 2007
Hi all - I'm trying to optimized my stored procedures to be a bit easier to maintain, and am sure this is possible, not am very unclear on the syntax to doing this correctly. For example, I have a simple stored procedure that takes a string as a parameter, and returns its resolved index that corresponds to a record in my database. ie
exec dbo.DeriveStatusID 'Created'
returns an int value as 1
(performed by "SELECT statusID FROM statusList WHERE statusName= 'Created')
but I also have a second stored procedure that needs to make reference to this procedure first, in order to resolve an id - ie:
exec dbo.AddProduct_Insert 'widget1'
which currently performs:SET @statusID = (SELECT statusID FROM statusList WHERE statusName='Created')INSERT INTO Products (productname, statusID) VALUES (''widget1', @statusID)
I want to simply the insert to perform (in one sproc):
SET @statusID = EXEC deriveStatusID ('Created')INSERT INTO Products (productname, statusID) VALUES (''widget1', @statusID)
This works fine if I call this stored procedure in code first, then pass it to the second stored procedure, but NOT if it is reference in the second stored procedure directly (I end up with an empty value for @statusID in this example).
My actual "Insert" stored procedures are far more complicated, but I am working towards lightening the business logic in my application ( it shouldn't have to pre-vet the data prior to executing a valid insert).
Hopefully this makes some sense - it doesn't seem right to me that this is impossible, and am fairly sure I'm just missing some simple syntax - can anyone assist?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 11, 2005
SQL Server 2000Howdy All.Is it going to be faster to join several tables together and thenselect what I need from the set or is it more efficient to select onlythose columns I need in each of the tables and then join them together?The joins are all Integer primary keys and the tables are all about thesame.I need the fastest most efficient method to extract the data as thisquery is one of the most used in the system.Thanks,Craig
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 15, 2008
i have created the folowing function but keep geting an error.
Only functions and extended stored procedures can be executed from within a function.
Why am i getting this error!
Create Function myDateAdd
(@buildd nvarchar(4), @avdate as nvarchar(25))
Returns nvarchar(25)
as
Begin
declare @ret nvarchar(25)
declare @sqlval as nvarchar(3000)
set @sqlval = 'select ''@ret'' = max(realday) from (
select top '+ @buildd +' realday from v_caltable where realday >= '''+ @avdate +''' and prod = 1 )a'
execute sp_executesql @sqlval
return @ret
end
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 17, 2006
hi
i need to use only one stored procedure and access many tablesso how write a stored procedure for that dohelp me looking forward for a reply to the earliest i am developing web page using asp.net using c# and sqlserver as backend
looking forward for a replygayathri
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 15, 2006
I am interested to know about stored procedures in Mssql .Can anyone please help me out.
Thanx in advance.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 24, 2007
Hello I have two stored procedures
@ID INT
AS
SELECT (CASE WHEN NUM >= 10 THEN CAST(PAID AS FLOAT) / CAST(NUM AS FLOAT) * 100 WHEN NUM < 10 THEN 0 END) AS PER
FROM (SELECT (SELECT COUNT(*) AS Expr1
FROM Event_data AS D LEFT OUTER JOIN
Events AS E ON E.id = D.Event_id
WHERE (D.Transaction_type = 1) AND (D.Player_id = @ID)) AS NUM,
(SELECT COUNT(*) AS Expr1
FROM Event_data AS D LEFT OUTER JOIN
Events AS E ON E.id = D.Event_id
WHERE (D.Transaction_type = 1) AND (D.Transaction_value > 0) AND (D.Player_id = @ID)) AS PAID) AS X
and
@ID INT
AS
SELECT P.*,'/' + DBO.GETCHIPFOLDER(@ID) + '/' + ISNULL(P.PHOTO,'BLANK.GIF') AS PIC,ISNULL(
(SELECT SUM(TRANSACTION_VALUE)
FROM EVENT_DATA WHERE PLAYER_ID=@ID AND TRANSACTION_TYPE=1
GROUP BY PLAYER_ID),0) AS WINNINGS FROM PLAYERS P
undefined P
The first returns a percentage for player wins, the second gives me a photo and sums the player winnings
I would like to combine the results so I can get the percentage and wininngs in one query, in another matter all together I would like create a procedure like the first but instead of returning only one player, I would like to return the percentage for each player
Thanks in advance for any light you can shine on this.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 25, 2007
I have a question about stored procedures, Is it better to use stored procedures even if I only use it once at my site? Or is it better to write the sql-part directly in the sqldatasource?
And am I forced to create two different stored procedures even if they are exactly the same except the "Where-part"?
Now I have around 40 stored procedures, and quite many of them looks the same except the where-part...
(Iam just a beginner with SQL)
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 2, 2007
Hello every one,
I m working in aspx 2.0 with sql server 2005, please tell me how can I create Stored Procedures for two or more tables not a single table(select,insert,update,delete please send me the queries which can help me in easy way I will very thankful to you
Thank you
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 19, 2007
I am learning to make a ASP web site and feel that if i can do it the harder way using some stored procedures instead of using multiple datasources on each page requiring that it might be better. So i am wondering what are these used for:DECLARE vs just entering "@param1 varchar(30)"When i use "DECLARE @rc int" i get the error "Incorrect syntax near DECLARE"How to return values to ASP page in Visual Studio 2005 How to use @@rowcount - doesn't seem to work for me?i tried using DECLARE @rc intSET @rc = @@rowcountWhen to use GO, BEGIN etcIf i want to use the variable only in the procedure, and not needed to be inputed, do i need to put it in the CREATE PROCEDURE (section)?Should i use my own stored procedures or VS2005 created ones using datasources? not really procedures but SQL, in SQL can i do like IF ELSE? if i use my own i cant use the Optimistic Concurrency right? and whats that?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 5, 2007
Is there a website or somewhere i can go to read up on stored procedures??
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 2, 2007
cREATE PROCEDURE emp @val varchar(50)AS
declare @test varchar(50)declare @a varchar(50)set @a= @val + '_a'set @test = 'alter table dbo.rights_user add ' + @a + ' varchar(50) null'
execute(@test)
GO
this is my procedure...anyth wrong here...i can able to execute procedure only with 3 char..egexec emp 'na'exec emp 'hr10'--->wen i try like this cannot..showing datataype mis match
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 18, 2007
Hi,
Can anyone help me. I've created a stored procedure in sql server and I'm trying to run it from my asp.net page. On Database Explorer I can't see it, or any for that matter, however I can see tables in the same schema.
Also I can't see it when I build a table adapter either.
Can anybody help?
Thanks
Sam
View 5 Replies
View Related