Can anyone let me now why the extent scan fragmentation is very high.
I do have a clustered index on this table .
The fill factor is 0 and this table has high inserts as it is used to maintain history.
Rebuilding the Indexes did not help.
DBCC SHOWCONTIG scanning 'ACCOUNTS' table...
Table: 'ACCOUNTS'(1061578820); index ID: 1, database ID: 5
TABLE level scan performed.
- Pages Scanned................................: 728157
- Extents Scanned..............................: 91759
- Extent Switches..............................: 93305
- Avg. Pages per Extent........................: 7.9
- Scan Density .......: 97.55% [91020:93306]
- Logical Scan Fragmentation ..................: 0.33%
- Extent Scan Fragmentation ...................: 99.99%
- Avg. Bytes Free per Page.....................: 76.6
- Avg. Page Density (full).....................: 99.05%
DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages, contact your system administrator
Thanks in advance,
Shades[B]Extent Scan Fragmentation
On some tables when I run DBCC ShowContig followed by DBReindex followed by ShowContig I notice Extent Scan Fragmentation actually increases. Why does this happen? Below are the SHOWCONTIG results after running DBReindex three times.
Hello. When reviewing the DBCC SHOWCONTIG immediately after reindexing all indexes on a database, I see the ExtentFragmentation has values like 50 to 70%... These are SQL 2005 tables with clustered PK's, no large varchars/blobs, and at least 100 pages in the index... The numbers related to PAGE fragmentation are ok after reindexing, but not the EXTENT fragmentation numbers.
I noticed the drive is in need of being defragged at the disk level. Is that a reason why reindexing doesn't fix the Extent frag numbers?? ANy other ideas on this? I can try defragging the DISK over the weekend, bringing the database offline then, but any other thougths on why the Extents show these high %'s? Is there any command to reset them and maybe that isn't happening? Like must I do update usage to get valid Extent frag #'s??
If there were MANY autogrows on the files, is that a different level of fragmentation? and how could all those small pieces of files be pulled back together? Thanks, Bruce
hello everyone,we dropped the clustered & nonclustered indeces on a table, thenrebuilt them. logical fragmentation is near zero, but extentfragmentation is about 40%. how can this be if the indeces are brandnew?
I have a table with 50% Logical Scan Fragmentation. [ according to Dbcc Showcontig (myTable) ] Why after running DBCC INDEXDEFRAG (myDB,myTable) does it still sit at 50%. Why isn't it lower?
Is there a way to configure mirroring to go from High Availability to High Protection without having to reconfigure Database Mirroring? Using the interface in Management Studio, I can change the configuration option to High Performance, but not High Protection despite both of them being Synchronous.
If not, what are the recommended steps to configure the mirror once it already has been configured? Is just like initially setting up the mirror or would there be any shortcuts I could take? If I stop the mirroring and remove the witness, will the High Protection option be available?
I realise this is a stupid quesiton but i cannot really find any confirmation of this in BOL.
If you are running High Safety with automatic failover, when failover occurs does this automatically change to High Performance mode. SInce for failover to occur something has happen with the primary , it will be impossible to commit transactions on the new primary and mirror asyncronously since 1 of them is no longer available.
So am i correct in assuming that automatic failover also automatically changes the mode to High Performacne for that session?
Again I am confused about the extent of being convinced by the mining models. We can validate the models with accuracy chart, but then to what extent can we trust that? (you never get 100% correct miming models) If we dont trust the results of the models, then the patterns the models discover are meaningless.
Just need some advices from you experts here to help me convince people on what I got from my mining models.
I am looking forward to hearing from you shortly and thank you very much.
This is on Sybase but I'm guessing that the same situation would happen on SQL Server. (Please confirm if you know).
I'm looking at these new databases and I'm seeing code similar to this all over the place:
if not exists (select 1 from dbo.t1 where f1 = @p1) begin select @errno = @errno | 1 end
There's a unique clustered in dex on t1.f1.
The execution plan shows this for this statement:
FROM TABLE dbo.t1 EXISTS TABLE : nested iteration. Table Scan. Forward scan. Positioning at start of table.
It's not using my index!!!!!
It seems to be the case with EXISTS statements. Can anybody confirm?
I also hinted to use the index but it still didn't use it.
If the existence check really doesn't use the index, what's a good code alternative to this check?
I did this and it's working great but I wonder if there's a better alternative. I don't really like doing the SET ROWCOUNT 1 and then SET ROWCOUNT 0 thing. SELECT TOP 1 won't work on Sybase, :-(.
SET ROWCOUNT 1 SELECT @cnt = (SELECT 1 FROM dbo.t1 (index ix01) WHERE f1 = @p1 ) SET ROWCOUNT 0
I write a work about database, and I want to write the diffrence between Table scan and Index scan. When is the index scan effectient? Use the database a Table scan when there is an index on the table or always a index scan when the index is nonselective? Can be a Table Scan effecient than a index scan?
Would someone please let me know which is the better way to reduce fragmentation on Windows:NT drive? dbcc indexdefrag or dbcc reindex or dropping and recreating indexes through SQL?
I am having problems w/ the indexes on a particular table. Currently the scan density if 25%. I have ran the dbcc dbreindex and the scan density does not improve. I have manually dropped and recreated all of the indexes on the table (there are only two) and still no help.
I have a clustered Primary Key index on my part_number and project_number fields and another index on the project_number field. If I drop the second index and only have my primary key index, it still doesn't help. The fill factor was originally set to 90% and I changed this to 30%, 20%, 10%, 0% and the best scan density I could acheive was 50%.
The data in this table is not updated that often, on average about 15 records a day are updated, and there are only 107 records. This is a small table, but there is a possibility for it to grow rapidly and I want to be prepared now.
Does anyone have any ideas or suggestions? I've tried everything I can think of with no luck.
Can anyone tell me how to get rid of the Table Scan(1 million rows)being performed on the The last line, option (loop loin) stopped table scanning the B.ss_manifest and started using the index, I'd like both tables to use the index. This is the argument I get from execution plan under the table scan. Object ((D4000).(dbo).(shipstop)as (A))
update drivers set dr_miles_run = case when D1.miles > 0 then d1.miles else 0 end from (select mf_dr_nbr, sum( case when A.ss_end_dt < '05/17/00' then ( cast((datediff(day, '05/17/00' , B.ss_end_dt ) + 1) as float) / cast( (datediff(day, A.ss_end_dt , B.ss_end_dt ) + 1) as float) * mf_ld_miles) else mf_ld_miles end) as miles from manifest, shipstop A, shipstop B where mf_manifest_nbr = A.ss_manifest_nbr and mf_manifest_nbr = B.ss_manifest_nbr and A.ss_stop_type in ('OR','SA') and B.ss_stop_type in ('DT','RD') and ((A.ss_end_dt >= '05/17/00 00:00' and A.ss_end_dt < '05/24/00 00:00') OR ((B.ss_end_dt >= '05/17/00 00:00' and B.ss_end_dt < '05/24/00 00:00'))) and mf_status > 3 group by mf_dr_nbr ) as D1 where Drivers.dr_driver_nbr = D1.mf_dr_nbr option (loop join)
CREATE TABLE #t7e07c01fa80143ff84cb14a2307809f7 ( [AUTOID_TEMP] [int] IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL, ... ) ON [PRIMARY]
ALTER TABLE #t7e07c01fa80143ff84cb14a2307809f7 ADD CONSTRAINT [PK_t7e07c01fa80143ff84cb14a2307809f7] PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED ( [AUTOID_TEMP] ) ON [PRIMARY]
Insert Into #t7e07c01fa80143ff84cb14a2307809f7 Selet columns... from t....
-- get total records Declare @TotalCount as int select @TotalCount = count(AUTOID_TEMP) from #t7e07c01fa80143ff84cb14a2307809f7
Now the above last statement does a index scan. I am new to indexing/tuning and was wondering if its normal - if so why and can I somehow enhance this?
I have a procedure that runs everyday which takes the IIS log file from the previous day and imports it and calcs values. I would like to change this from taking the previous day to scanning all the file names in the folder and comparing them to a database to see if they have already been scanned before. I already have a table called DatesScanned which lists the filename and scandate.
Hi,Can someone please explain the following1. Meaning of scan count as reported when "statistics io" is turned onprior to running a query.2. In which situations could you have an identical database runningon two diferent servers , with identical database serverconfigurations, running identical queries, with identical query plan,report large discrepency in the scan count . This is one of thepossibilities we are looking at in terms of the reason why one serverruns the job in 12 hours and the other in 24 hours.Server 1--------Table 'TRANS_HISTORY'. Scan count 216, logical reads 897093, physicalreads 44, read-ahead reads 900599.SQL Server Execution Times:CPU time = 27766 ms, elapsed time = 46850 ms.UNIT_NUMBERACCOUNT_TYPETRANSACTION_TYPEServer 2--------Table 'TRANS_HISTORY'. Scan count 491, logical reads 952759, physicalreads 51, read-ahead reads 954414.SQL Server Execution Times:CPU time = 31563 ms, elapsed time = 145595 ms.UNIT_NUMBERACCOUNT_TYPETRANSACTION_TYPEI thank you in advance for your assistance.Puvendran
Does SQL Server allow a table scan to be used when querying a table that has a clustered-index? If yes, could someone please show me the syntax? I have tried with (index(0)) but this appararently means a clustered index scan when there is a clustered index on the table to be queried.
Or does clustered index scan mean the same thing as a table scan when the table has a clustered index? Confused.
I do not understand it but by connection to my database seems to keep crapping out. I get the below error and my app appears to be unable to access the connection. Then a couple restarts later it tells me that my login under my Windows User failed . The database is there and besides maybe a couple records longer there isnt anything corrupt about the data, and in fact, if I restart the entire PC most times it will allow me to connect again. I can even still access the data tables through the C# editor. Any idea why this error is being thrown?
Thx
Code SnippetSystem.Data.SqlClient.SqlException was unhandled Message="A system assertion check has failed. Check the SQL Server error log for details The log scan number (35:460:2) passed to log scan in database 'F:\PDLOGSHEET\PDLOGSHEET\BIN\DEBUG\DATABASE1.MDF' is not valid. This error may indicate data corruption or that the log file (.ldf) does not match the data file (.mdf). If this error occurred during replication, re-create the publication. Otherwise, restore from backup if the problem results in a failure during startup. An error occurred during recovery, preventing the database 'F:\PDLOGSHEET\PDLOGSHEET\BIN\DEBUG\DATABASE1.MDF' (database ID 26) from restarting. Diagnose the recovery errors and fix them, or restore from a known good backup. If errors are not corrected or expected, contact Technical Support. Cannot open user default database. Login failed. Login failed for user 'GC\cbcottier'. Location: logscan.cpp:1925Expression: UtilDbccIsInsideDbcc ()SPID: 51Process ID: 3640 Location: logscan.cpp:1925Expression: UtilDbccIsInsideDbcc ()SPID: 51Process ID: 3640" Source=".Net SqlClient Data Provider" ErrorCode=-2146232060 Class=20 LineNumber=65536 Number=3624 Procedure="" Server="\\.\pipe\E74940B1-0BD7-42\tsql\query" State=1 StackTrace: at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.GetConnection(DbConnection owningObject) at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection) at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionClosed.OpenConnection(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open() at System.Data.Common.DbDataAdapter.FillInternal(DataSet dataset, DataTable[] datatables, Int32 startRecord, Int32 maxRecords, String srcTable, IDbCommand command, CommandBehavior behavior) at System.Data.Common.DbDataAdapter.Fill(DataTable[] dataTables, Int32 startRecord, Int32 maxRecords, IDbCommand command, CommandBehavior behavior) at System.Data.Common.DbDataAdapter.Fill(DataTable dataTable) at PDLogSheet.Database1DataSetTableAdapters.ReportTitlesTableAdapter.Fill(ReportTitlesDataTable dataTable) in F:PDLogSheetPDLogSheetDatabase1DataSet.Designer.cs:line 4362 at PDLogSheet.frmLogSheet.frmLogSheet_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) in F:PDLogSheetPDLogSheetfrmLogSheet.cs:line 42 at System.Windows.Forms.Form.OnLoad(EventArgs e) at System.Windows.Forms.Form.OnCreateControl() at System.Windows.Forms.Control.CreateControl(Boolean fIgnoreVisible) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.CreateControl() at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmShowWindow(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.ScrollableControl.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.ContainerControl.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Form.WmShowWindow(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Form.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.OnMessage(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.DebuggableCallback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam) at System.Windows.Forms.SafeNativeMethods.ShowWindow(HandleRef hWnd, Int32 nCmdShow) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.SetVisibleCore(Boolean value) at System.Windows.Forms.Form.SetVisibleCore(Boolean value) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.set_Visible(Boolean value) at System.Windows.Forms.Application.ThreadContext.RunMessageLoopInner(Int32 reason, ApplicationContext context) at System.Windows.Forms.Application.ThreadContext.RunMessageLoop(Int32 reason, ApplicationContext context) at System.Windows.Forms.Application.Run(Form mainForm) at PDLogSheet.Program.Main() in F:PDLogSheetPDLogSheetProgram.cs:line 17 at System.AppDomain.nExecuteAssembly(Assembly assembly, String[] args) at System.Runtime.Hosting.ManifestRunner.Run(Boolean checkAptModel) at System.Runtime.Hosting.ManifestRunner.ExecuteAsAssembly() at System.Runtime.Hosting.ApplicationActivator.CreateInstance(ActivationContext activationContext, String[] activationCustomData) at System.Runtime.Hosting.ApplicationActivator.CreateInstance(ActivationContext activationContext) at Microsoft.VisualStudio.HostingProcess.HostProc.RunUsersAssemblyDebugInZone() at System.Threading.ThreadHelper.ThreadStart_Context(Object state) at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(ExecutionContext executionContext, ContextCallback callback, Object state) at System.Threading.ThreadHelper.ThreadStart()
When an end user view a report using report manager or a custom build web site, would query of the report scan the tables in original data base? In this case it is a OLTP data base.
i have inherited a database running on sql7 sp2. a lot of the tables do not have a clustered index. some of these tables are highly fragmented. below is a sample of the dbcc showcontig output
this table has 5 non-null char columns whose total length is 43 chars and the table occupies about 900 mb for only about 670,000 rows! select on the table sucks!
since there is no clustered index i have to rebuild the table to remove the fragmentation. is there a way to reorganize the table without recreating it?
I have a problem with defragmenting the tables. When i ran dbcc showcontig for the tables, it shows 94%, 50%, 33% fragmentations . I have rebuild indexes on all those tables and ran dbcc showcontig again but still it shows the same % of fragmentations. Is there any way to remove fragmentation on all the tables completely. Any help would be appreciated.
What's the best way to find out if disk fragmentation on Windows 2000 Server is affecting SQL Server performance?
If disk fragmentation is shown to be a cause of performance problems, what are the recommendations for a disk fragmentation strategy? eg. use the win 2000 built in disk defrag utility or buy a 3rd party product like DiskKeeper? How much of an overhead is a product like DiskKeeper that defrags in the background?
How can I mesure the database fragmentation ? Cause DBCC SHOWCONTIG shows obects fragmentation only. I would like to see the whole database fragmentation.
What functions of tools do you use for managing index fragmentation?
DBCC?
I am working through MS Press SQL 2005 book and it mentions the sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats function? It then give an example of code which is very involved.
