Anyone know why the horizontal scroll bar doesnt show up when the data is too large to fit into the given window? The vertical scroll bar will show up but never the horizontal.
Any ideas?
Thanks
I am working with a dynamically populated multi value parameter drop down list. In the case where there is only one value in the list, the horizontal scroll bar (due to the length of the value) covers up the first, and in this case only choice. The users cannot see it. This problem is only when running in report manager. It works ok in Visual Studio.
As a work around, I can add a dummy row, which then at least the users can see one row of data and then scroll down but, I would rather not do that, if there is another solution. Another option would be to set the default on the parameter so it is automatically selected but, in the case where there are many values, I do not want a default set.
Your help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Hi frds,
Is there is any way to put a Horizonta scroll bar for the Matrix repot.And the First column should allways visible when user scorlls from left to right.
Rgerds
Sithender,S
How can i show scroll bar in winform report viewer.?
I have set Auscroll = true..
But that didnt effect
I have a report that has rolled-up groups with the "expand row" + sign on each row. Everything works great except when you click the + the report scrolls everything above the + off the screen which completely re-shifts the users context... which nobody likes... how can we turn this "feature" off please?
thank you!
In SQL Server 2008 when I click the middle button I could scroll up and down(scroll wheel) by just flicking the mouse. We just upgraded to 2012 and I can't do that on my Lenovo ThinkPad. I am using an external wired usb mouse(Intelli Mouse) to scroll.
I have SQL server 2008 and 2012 installed on the same machine scrolling works in 2008 but not in 2012.
I am accessing remote reports via the Web ReportViewer control. I need to keep the document map on the report but I want to get rid of the extra set of scroll bars. Setting AsyncRendering to false removes the scroll bars and the document map. Is there a way to get rid of the scroll bars and keep the document map?
View 2 Replies View RelatedIs there a way to turn IE7's auto scroll off so that every time you drill down by clicking on one of the "+" toggle buttons the report doesn't recenter itself. We find this window jumping/scrolling highly annoying to watch.
This problem does NOT occur in FFox, just Microsoft's browsers.
We are displaying this report running on another server running Visual Studio 2005's ReportViewer control in an aspx (ASP.NET) page.
We are using SSRS 2005, std edition.
FFox 2.0.0.6, IE7.
Will be glad to post more info if requested.
Just upgraded to Windows 10. My SSRS reports, SharePoint 2013 integrated, still work but have no scroll bars. I can use the touchscreen to scroll left and right. Mouse wheel or any other attempts to scroll the report view don't work.
View 4 Replies View RelatedIf I have the raw data dumped into a big table as following:
Date P R M E Date P R M E Date P R M E Date P R M E
1/1/90 1 2 3 4 1/1/90 2 3 4 5 1/1/90 3 4 5 6 1/1/90 4 5 6 7
...
1/1/05 1 2 3 4 1/1/05 2 3 4 5 1/1/05 3 4 5 6 1/1/05 4 5 6 7
And this table has a repeating block [D, P, R, M,E] 300 times. Is it possible to write a loop query/stored procedures/triggers (or whatever it is) to read each repeating block and stack them on top of each other to insert into another table which has the same structure as following?
Look like this?
Date P R M E
1/1/90 1 2 3 4
...
1/1/05 1 2 3 4
1/1/90 2 3 4 5
...
1/1/05 2 3 4 5
1/1/90 3 4 5 6
...
1/1/05 3 4 5 6
If there is a solution would you please elaborate, example?
Thank you for the help.
shiparsons
Hello all,Thinking about building a new database in the enterprise addition ofsql server and using some horizontal parititioning techniques in orderto accomaodat what will eventually be a monster huge database.Can you share some hard earned experience, gotchas, etc...with me? Wewill be setting up this server on a SAN array that will be made up ofjust one or two huge virtual RAID10 volumes and I am also wonderingabout the wisdom of this? Its simple and should work, but is thatconfig relevant in any way specifically to our plan to partition?
View 2 Replies View RelatedHello frnds......what does mean by Horizontal Partitioning ?
View 4 Replies View RelatedSorry for the earliear question as itself is wrong ?
This is a right questions and what does it mean by ?
how can i use concatenation to query the results horizontally?
example output:
CustomerID=1002, Name=Mr Anderson, City=NY
I am testing horizontal partitions to see whether it is a feasible
option for a project. IF I have a composite Primary Key and the
constraint column (a part of the Primary Key) that helps the
partitioned view is defined with DateTime Data Type, select on a restricted set of data through a partitioned view still tries to access all the tables instead of just one table that contains the data. Is this the case or am I
missing something ?
Any help on this is appreciated.
Here is what I am trying to do.
************************************************** **************
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[tst01] (
[Dt] datetime NOT NULL ,
[TID] int NOT NULL ,
[Nm] [char] (10) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[tst02] (
[Dt] datetime NOT NULL ,
[TID] int NOT NULL,
[Nm] [char] (10) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[tst01] ADD
CONSTRAINT [PK_tst01] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[Dt], [TID]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[tst02] ADD
CONSTRAINT [PK_tst02] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[Dt], [TID]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[tst01] ADD
CONSTRAINT [CK_tst01] CHECK (Dt between '11/1/2002' and '11/30/2002')
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[tst02] ADD
CONSTRAINT [CK_tst02] CHECK (Dt between '12/1/2002' and '12/31/2002')
GO
insert into tst01 values('11/1/2002', 1, 'SS')
insert into tst01 values('11/2/2002', 2, 'KK')
insert into tst01 values('11/3/2002', 3, 'DD')
Go
insert into tst02 values('12/1/2002', 1, 'LL')
insert into tst02 values('12/2/2002', 2, 'MM')
insert into tst02 values('12/3/2002', 3, 'GG')
Go
CREATE VIEW vtst AS
SELECT * FROM tst01
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM tst02
Go
SELECT * FROM vtst WHERE dt = '11/1/2002'
************************************************** *********
When I look at the Execution Plan, it shows that clustered index seek
would be performed on both the tables.
StmtText
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|--Concatenation
|--Filter(WHERE:(STARTUP EXPR(Convert([@1])<='Nov 30 2002
12:00AM' AND Convert([@1])>='Nov 1 2002 12:00AM')))
| |--Clustered Index
Seek(OBJECT:([test].[dbo].[tst01].[PK_tst01]),
SEEK:([tst01].[Dt]=Convert([@1])) ORDERED FORWARD)
|--Filter(WHERE:(STARTUP EXPR(Convert([@1])<='Dec 31 2002
12:00AM' AND Convert([@1])>='Dec 1 2002 12:00AM')))
|--Clustered Index
Seek(OBJECT:([test].[dbo].[tst02].[PK_tst02]),
SEEK:([tst02].[Dt]=Convert([@1])) ORDERED FORWARD)
Thanks,
Sathish
I'm running SQL Server 2008 Standard.I need to create a query that has data from multiple columns (Columns 1-6 with coresponding Date started and Date Completed data) displayed vertically, but also has the column name the preeceeding column to identify it...along with other data (Record number, status).
Record Number, Status, Column Name, Date Started, DateCompleted
1, Open, Column 1, 1/1/2012, 2/1/2012,
2, Hold, Column 2, 1/3/2012, 3/1/2012,
1, Open, Column 3, 2/5/2012, 4/6/2012,
3, Closed, Column 4, 5/10/2012, 7/25/2012,
2, Hold, Column 5, 3/9/2012, 4/1/2012,
1, open, Column 6, 10/10/2012, 12/12/2012,
I'm considering using horizontal partitions to separate my data by year.
For example, SomeTable_2004, SomeTable_2003, etc. This works well for backups, maintenance, etc. because I'm working with 150+ GB of data. I'll be a partitioned view for queries.
However, I'm new at this and have a few questions. I would also like to do partitioned updates or inserts. But I need to make sure that the tables don't use similar primary keys. Does that make sense? I need to make sure that the primary keys from the first table are not used again in the second table.
SomeTable_2003
primary keys: 1,5,8,9,15
SomeTable_2004
primary keys: 2,3,4,10
I don't really care what keys are used on what table, as long as they are different. I have apps that already use this data, and I don't want to change the application logic.
Thanks,
T
id name
--- -----------------
236 SERVICE REQUEST
236 HARDWARE
236 Desktop
336 Loan
id name
-- ----------------------------
236 SERVICE REQUEST/ HARDWARE/ Desktop/Laptop/ Loan
I have a table like this:
weight type factory1 factory2 factory3 factory4.... to factory 150
1kg goods 5.00 5.50 5.20 5.00...
2kg goods 6.00 6.20 6.15 6.30...
3kg goods 4.00 4.50 5.00 4.30...
...
and would like to extract data this way:
producer type weight price
factory1 goods 1kg 5.00
factory1 goods 2kg 6.00
factory1 goods 3kg 4.00
factory1.....
then
factory2 goods 1kg 5.50
factory2 goods 2kg 6.20
and so on for all factories.
I tried with UNPIVOT but it does not allow it (I'm using Navicat 8), saying "You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near UNPIVOT...".
Hi all
I dont want to use functions or proceedures but with select itself I want to get the above mentioned result. Can somebody help
SURESH IYER
I have 2 installations:1. W2k with MS SQL 2000 sp2.2. W2003 with MS SQL sp3.There are two databases in all instalations: "maindb" and "userdb". Thetable with data is in maindb.In the 1'st installation I restict user access to all data in table in thisway:- create user's login and user in databases maindb and userdb.- create view in userdb with "where" clause as dbo (dbo is owner of thisview). This clause restict access to data. (create view userdb.dbo.table asselect * from maindb.dbo.table where ...)- add user to group "Public" in maindb.- add role "data reader" to user in userdb.- effect: user can access data only by view, can not access any data inmaindb.I do the same in secound installation:- effect: user can not access data by view - message like this: "userhave not permission to select on maindb.dbo.table"Is this bug in sp3 or in sp2 ?Is there another way to horizontal restrict access data in tables?In Sybase ASE this method (restict by view) works ok. And there is newproperty of ASE 12.5.1 - administrator can define context of login - the"where" clause will be added automatically to any select.Please help me. Thank You for any advice.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI recently came across a database where the data are horizonally partitionedinto 4 tables. I'm not sure if this was a poor design choice, or if it wasdone for valid performance reasons. The schema of the tables are essentiallythe same, it's just that they are named differenly and the columns are nameddifferenlty to differentiate the data from a business usage perspective. Thetables could easily be combined inot one by adding a new colum to theclustered index that would be used to differentiate the business usage. I amtrying to evaluate whether combining the tables would improve performance orif it would be better to leave them the way they are. Many queries that runagainst these tables do not request records from more than one of thetables, which is good. However, there are a number of processes that queryagainst all of the tables on the identical clustered index range. I am notsure exactly how many rows are in the tables but I'm fairly certain theentire database is < 50 GB.
View 13 Replies View RelatedHI, I'm testing out partitioning for an upcoming project and I'm a little confused over the query plan im generating.
I have a 13 million row table I want to break in to date ranges:
tables are calljrnl,calljrnl_1999 and calljrnl_2000. The calljrnl table contains data for the last six months. one view, calljrnl_view is a union all of these three tables.
alter table calljrnl add constraint dt_constraint check (cj_created_dt >= '2000-10-01 00:00:00')
alter table calljrnl_1999 add constraint dt_constraint_1999 check (cj_created_dt <='1999-12-31 23:59:59')
alter table calljrnl_2000 add constraint dt_constraint_2000 check (cj_created_dt >='2000-01-01 00:00:000')
alter table calljrnl_2000 add constraint dt_constraint_2000_2 check (cj_created_dt <='2000-09-30 23:59:59')
The problem I'm having is that when I query on any date range outside the constraints set on the calljrnl_2000 table, It still wants to scan the calljrnl_2000 table.
I'm assuming this has something to do with how the constraints are structured, but I am not able to find the right combination.
ALL HELP IS GREATLY APPRECIATED!!!!
Hi,
I have a table with 52 million rows which resides on Primary file group in my database. Because of huge number of rows the performance has gone very down and I would like to break the table into parts.
Can anyone suggest me the steps for doing the same and the number of parts that should be made. It is named as Account_Transactions and contains information of Policies in an insurance database.
Rajat
I have a table as follows
opendate (datetime) callnumber (int) closed (bit)
I want to find how many calls were opened today and of those how many are closed
I have come up with the code below but again am looking for
1. a more elegant solution
2. a way to generalise this to show the same information for x number of days
create table #holdit1
(opencount int)
create table #holdit2
(closedcount int)
insert into #holdit1
SELECT count(*) as opencount
FROM [dbo].[problog]
WHERE datediff(dd, opendate, getdate()) = 0
AND closed = 0
group by closed
insert into #holdit2
SELECT count(*) as closedcount
FROM [dbo].[problog]
WHERE datediff(dd, opendate, getdate()) = 0
AND closed = 1
group by closed
select #holdit1.opencount AS CallsOpen, #holdit2.closedcount AS CallsClosed, #holdit1.opencount + #holdit2.closedcount AS AllCalls
from #holdit1 cross join #holdit2 #holdit2
DROP TABLE #holdit1
DROP TABLE #holdit2
this gives me
CallsOpen CallsClosed AllCalls
----------- ----------- -----------
1 3 4
I have the following SQL query that I like to view the out put in horizontal format:
Select ID, First_name, Last_name from ABC
Instead of getting out-put like
Id First_name Last_name
1Jim Smith
2Tom Jones
I like to see the out-put like:
Id1 2
First_nameJimSmith
Last_nameTomJones
Please advice.
Thanks in advance,
Abrahim
Hi,
What I need is the following, a StoredProc that make a Vertical (normal table) into a Horizontal Table :
So From:
CustNo__Item
__1______1
__1______3
__1______4
__2______2
__2______3
__2______7
To:
CustNo___1__2___3___4___7
_1_______X______X___X
_2__________X___X_______X
Anny help would be verry appriciated
I have a client with a fairly simple table as illustrated in my sample code. Their interesting requirement is that the records would be listed horizontally, end-to-end as I hope you can visualize based on what I'm providing here. Two other characteristics/specs of note, 1) there could be as few as two records end-to-end in a row or as many as 100 and 2) of course the column headings would have to be unique.
create table #tmpEndToEnd
(
ID int identity,
ClientID char(10),
Agency varchar(20),
Clinician varchar(20),
Goal varchar(50)
[code]....
Hello,
We are generating RDL file on the fly using a XSLT. We are trying to implement an auto width to all the columns dislpayed in the Report. Is Automatic horizontal width for column supported in RDL? If so how? If not is there is any workaround for it?
We tried using CanGrow and CanShrink tags, but those are for only vertical.
Thanks in advance.
I would like to display a couple of records horizontally via a table or list, but don't think this is possible. Am I right? The given recordset should only have two records and the formatting would be much better if they were displayed left to right rather than one on top of the other. Is this just not possible with SSRS? Thanks,
Levi
I'll admit I am fairly new to the reporting services, but I managed to figure most things out so far except this one. I have a matrix report where I have column groupings of:
Sales person
Region
Basically, the report shows sales by sales person and region, and I added subtotals to each so each salesman/region combination gets subtotals, as does each salesman entry. Now, the one piece missing is the 'total of the subtotals' so to speak. So if I have something like:
Salesman Region Sales Jan Sales Feb Sales Mar
001 A $100 $175 $50
B $100 $200 $100
C $200 $100 $50
Total $400 $475 $200
002 A $100 $175 $50
B $100 $200 $100
C $200 $100 $50
Total $400 $475 $200
Grand Total $800 $950 $400
What I want to do is sum up the totals and add another column like so:
Salesman Region Sales Jan Sales Feb Sales Mar
001 A $100 $175 $50
B $100 $200 $100
C $200 $100 $50
Total $400 $475 $200 $1075
002 A $100 $175 $50
B $100 $200 $100
C $200 $100 $50
Total $400 $475 $200 $1075
Grand Total $800 $950 $400 $2150
And that is where I am stuck. In Report Designer, with the existing matrix report as above, how do I get these horizontal totals of the subtotals?
I want to append vertical row result into horizontal
CREATE TABLE #mable(mid INT, token nvarchar(16))
INSERT INTO #mable VALUES (0, 'foo')
INSERT INTO #mable VALUES(0, 'goo')
INSERT INTO #mable VALUES(1, 'hoo')
INSERT INTO #mable VALUES(1, 'moo')
Actual output
[code]....
Hi,
Is there a report viewer property that needs to be set to enable the horizontal scroll bar. My reports are being cut off at the end of the iframe. I have several other reports that do show the horizontal scroll bar, but for some reason all my reports in the newly created project do not allow horizontal scrolling. Vertical scrolling is still available.
Thanks
Umer