How can I JOIN the results of two stored procs?
I have a two stored procs: sp_Users_GetByID and sp_UserInfo_GetByID
I want to create another stored proc that basically grabs the results from both of these, joins them, and returns that data. I just don't know how...
Seems like I'm stealing all the threads here, : But I need to learn :) I have a StoredProcedure that needs to return values that other StoredProcedures return.Rather than have my DataAccess layer access the DB multiple times, I would like to call One stored Procedure, and have that stored procedure call the others to get the information I need. I think this way would be more efficient than accessing the DB multiple times. One of my SP is:SELECT I.ItemDetailID, I.ItemDetailStatusID, I.ItemDetailTypeID, I.Archived, I.Expired, I.ExpireDate, I.Deleted, S.Name AS 'StatusName', S.ItemDetailStatusID, S.InProgress as 'StatusInProgress', S.Color AS 'StatusColor',T.[Name] AS 'TypeName', T.Prefix, T.Name AS 'ItemDetailTypeName', T.ItemDetailTypeID FROM [Item].ItemDetails I INNER JOIN Item.ItemDetailStatus S ON I.ItemDetailStatusID = S.ItemDetailStatusID INNER JOIN [Item].ItemDetailTypes T ON I.ItemDetailTypeID = T.ItemDetailTypeID However, I already have StoredProcedures that return the exact same data from the ItemDetailStatus table and ItemDetailTypes table.Would it be better to do it above, and have more code to change when a new column/field is added, or more checks, or do something like:(This is not propper SQL) SELECT I.ItemDetailID, I.ItemDetailStatusID, I.ItemDetailTypeID, I.Archived, I.Expired, I.ExpireDate, I.Deleted, EXEC [Item].ItemDetailStatusInfo I.ItemDetailStatusID, EXEC [Item].ItemDetailTypeInfo I.ItemDetailTypeID FROM [Item].ItemDetails IOr something like that... Any thoughts?
View 3 Replies View RelatedHello
I'm start to work with SSIS.
We have a lot (many hundreds) of old (SQL Server2000) procedures on SQL 2005.
Most of the Stored Procedures ends with the following commands:
SET @SQLSTRING = 'SELECT * INTO ' + @OutputTableName + ' FROM #RESULTTABLE'
EXEC @RETVAL = sp_executeSQL @SQLSTRING
How can I use SSIS to move the complete #RESULTTABLE to Excel or to a Flat File? (e.g. as a *.csv -File)
I found a way but I think i'ts only a workaround:
1. Write the #Resulttable to DB (changed Prozedure)
2. create data flow task (ole DB Source - Data Conversion - Excel Destination)
Does anyone know a better way to transfer the #RESULTTABLE to Excel or Flat file?
Thanks for an early Answer
Chaepp
Hi,
I need to keep track of the number of hits on a particular page. Im using a stored Procedure
What I want to do is get the number of hits and increment it by one :)
ie: Sub Procedure should be like below
SELECT noOfHits WHERE pageName = 'bla bla'
noOfHits = noOfHits + 1 etc.
Also, some of the pages will be added and deleted all the time, so before I increment the noOfHits variable I need to check that the pageName 'bla bla' exists. AND if it doesnt I need to create a pageName called 'bla bla'
What I need to do in essence is:
1. Check that a particular row exists. if it doesnt create it.
2. Increment a value (by one) to a column in this particular row.
Phew. Hope you got that. Any ideas much appreciated,
Thanks,
Pete
Has anyone had a problem where the stored procedure does not return the same results as compared to running the same SQL in ISQL? This happens when rows are added to a table that's in a join and the SP doesn't return those rows. Once it starts happening, it will not work consistently, but it doesn't always happen when new rows are added to a table. It has happened to many stored procedures and with many different tables. sp_recompile won't fix the problem. Only dropping and re-adding the SP will fix the problem with that stored procedure. We are using SQL 6.5.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have created multiple stored procedures that search different tables for similiar information.
Is it possible to have one main stored procedure that calls and executes each of these individual stored procedures and then use the UNION keyword to combine the results?
For example
Code:
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[Return_Detail]
@IDVarChar(200)
AS
--Get the 1st Detail
EXECReturn_1st_Detail @ID = @ID
UNION
--Get the 2nd Detail
EXECReturn_2nd_Detail @ID = @ID
GO
Hi. Does anyone know how to display the results if i execute "xp_fixeddrives, xp_availablemedia and xp_subdirs" commands with VC++ 6.0? I can't obtained the results using Recordset class. Can someone help me? Thank you.
|_N_T_|
Hi, I have a stored procedure that requires several input parameters. Iwould like to join the results of the stored procedure with anothertable but I'm having a tough time getting the syntax correct. Forexample:To run the stored procedure:exec usp_FetchPeople(@Gender = 'F', @City = 'Boston')This returns a table:PID | Age | EmailNow I want to join this with a table of notes but I can't get the syntaxcorret. Something like this:select N.Note from Notes as Ninner join (exec usp_FetchPeople(@Gender = 'F',@City = 'Boston')) as P on P.PID = N.PIDbut I get errors. What is the correct syntax? Thank you very much.David<img src="http://www.sen.us/mirror/SENLogo_62_31.jpg">Meet people for friendship, contacts,or romance using free instant messaging software! See a picture youlike? Click once for a private conversation with that person!http://www.sen.us*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi all,I have a challenge (not a problem). Simplifing it as far as i could, ihave this situation:Table PersonsId (PK)NameTable ScoresFK_Person (PK)Period (PK)ValueNow, i want to make a stored procedure that returns the scores for allpeople in a certain period. So i have:CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[ScorePerson](@Period Int)ASSELECT dbo.People.Name, dbo.Scores.[Value]FROM dbo.People LEFT OUTER JOINdbo.Scores ON dbo.People.Id =dbo.Scores.FK_personWHERE dbo.Scores.Period = @PeriodGOBUT: if a person has no score for a certain period, he will not showup in the result set at all, but i do want him to. So what i need todo is first get the subset for a period from the table Scores and THENLeft join that to the persons, so i always get all persons and only avalue for the the score if there is one.How can i do this? I could store the results in a temporary table butthat just feels 'unpure', wrong. Is there any way i can get this in asingle pass? Can i for example join two stored procedures withparameters together in another SP that passes these params on to them?TIA,Gert-Jan
View 7 Replies View RelatedIn my SPs, I commonly have a situation, where a SELECT statement gets a single scalar value (e.g. SELECT Name FROM Employee WHERE id=@id) from a table.
Because the result is still a relation, I cannot process it directly or assign the result to a variable
(like set @name = SELECT Name FROM Employee WHERE id=@id)
So, how can I process the results of the statement in this case.
In some other cases, the result is actually a relation. And I want to iterate over all rows, processing each row's columns.
(I know this smells of ADO.NET, but how can I help it if I am coming from that background)...
The point is I want to do all this in T-Sql on server side!!!
I have a stored procedure which simply does a SELECT on a table. This table has as a column a uniqueidentifier, which is not part of the PK. If I execute this procedure with the SQL Server tools, it works fine and returns the expected results. If I execute this SP with Visual Studio, or ASP.NET, no results are returned and the following comes back:Running [dbo].[spServiceDetail_Get] ( @ServiceDetailID = <DEFAULT>, @VictimWitnessID = <DEFAULT>).ServiceDetailID VictimWitnessID --------------- -------------------------------------- No rows affected.(1 row(s) returned)@RETURN_VALUE = 0Finished running [dbo].[spServiceDetail_Get]. Any ideas what is going wrong? This seems to be a common problem for many of our tables with a uniqueidentifier in them, and is specifically with VS 2005 and ASP.NET ObjectDataSources.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhy does this right join return the same results as using a left (or even a full join)?There are 470 records in Account, and there are 1611 records in Contact. But any join returns 793 records.
select Contact.firstname, Contact.lastname, Account.[Account Name]
from Contact
right join Account
on Contact.[Account Name] = Account.[Account Name]
where Contact.[Account Name] = Account.[Account Name]
I want to know the differences between SQL Server 2000 storedprocedures and oracle stored procedures? Do they have differentsyntax? The concept should be the same that the stored proceduresexecute in the database server with better performance?Please advise good references for Oracle stored procedures also.thanks!!
View 11 Replies View Related
Hi All,
I have a stored proc which is executing successfully...but the results of that stored proc are displaying in the Messages Tab instaed of results Tab. And in the Results Tab the results shows as 0..So, Any clue friends..it is very urgent..I am trying to call this stored proc in my Report in SSRS as well but the stored proc is not displaying there also...Please help me ASAP..
Thanks
dotnetdev1
Hi,
This Might be a really simple thing, however we have just installed SQL server 2005 on a new server, and are having difficulties with the set up of the Store Procedures. Every time we try to modify an existing stored procedure it attempts to save it as an SQL file, unlike in 2000 where it saved it as part of the database itself.
Thank you in advance for any help on this matter
i have a query with some inner joins that return information about an employee
i am running into a problem in that i need one employees email based on one inner join and anothers based on another inner join -- is there a way to get both in one query?
select employee.email , bunch of other stuff
from work
INNER JOIN technician ON business_location.technician_id = technician.technician_id
inner join salesrep on business_location.salesrepid = salesrep.salesrep_id
not sure how to get both of those to employee.emp_id and get the email
technician.technician_id = employee.emp_id
salesrep.salesrep_id = employee.emp_id
Hello, first post since I can usually find answers by reading the forums. I've searched the internet up and down and for some reason I can't get this query to work properly.
I have two tables:
ticket
ticket_id
ticket_to
ticket_from
message
message_id
ticket_id
message
There can be several messages per ticket, connected by the ticket_id. I'd like to only pull only the most recent message, as well as the results from the ticket table. Currently I'm getting all messages per ticket.
Here's what I have:
SELECT distinct ticket.ticket_to, ticket.ticket_from, message.ticket_id, message.message
FROM tickets
INNER JOIN message ON tickets.ticket_id = message.ticket_id
GROUP BY message.ticket_id, message, ticket_to, ticket_from
Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks much.
Hi, i guess u have run into it again..
I have 3 tables
Table 1 is holding word documents :
WordDoc
wd_id integer primary key
wd image
Table 2 is holding parts of the document in a master detail fashion as from one document we can create many parts of it.
WordPartDoc
wpd_id integer primary key
wpd_wd_id integer foreign key from WordDoc
wpd_part image
Table 3 holds the persons or groups to whom we have given a copy of a specific part.
PersonsCopiedAt
pca_id integer primarey key
pca_wpd_id integer foreing key from WordPartDoc
pca_pg_id integer this is the id of the table that holds the persons or the id of the table that holds the group
pca_p_or_g char(1) this is a flag : 'P' for a person, 'G' for a group
Now, here is my problem... I have created the following sql query
select wd_id, wpd_id
from wordDoc
inner join wordPartDoc on wpd_wd_id = wd_id
inner join PersonCopiedAt on pca_wpd_id = wpd_id
where pca_pg_id = someID and pca_p_or_g = 'G' --or 'P'
This works perfectly if a pca_pg_id is provided, but this is provided using a combobox... If the user doesn't select a person - and thus - no id is provided - inner join brings me as many records of wpd_id as the number of persons that were given a copy. I understand that this is the correct behaviour but in the later case (when no id is provided) i want only one record to be returned. Is there a way to do so ? do i have to redisign the db schema ?
thanx
theodore
Hello all,
I have been using T-SQL for a while now although the majority of my work required relativley simple queries.
I just need to know is there a way to JOIN the results of several SELECT queries, maybe through the use of functions??
A reference to any online article would be most helpful.
Cheers,
Sean
Using SQL 2005, SP2. All of a sudden, whenever I create any stored procedures in the master database, they get created as system stored procedures. Doesn't matter what I name them, and what they do.
For example, even this simple little guy:
CREATE PROCEDURE BOB
AS
PRINT 'BOB'
GO
Gets created as a system stored procedure.
Any ideas what would cause that and/or how to fix it?
Thanks,
Jason
I really must be missing something here...
Trying to cross-update 2 tables.
Picture a checkbook reconcilliation without common check numbers. The checkbook has uniqueids and the bank has transaction ids but they are different. So the match is on date/payee and amount. So I wrote 2 checks to the same person, on the same day, for the same amount but forgot to enter one in the register.
when i run the update statement:
update b set b.bankid=c.myid
from checks c
join bank b on c.cdate=b.cdate
and c.payee=b.payee
and c.cost=b.cost
Both bank statement records would be updated to my one check record [can't happen]
Also: this will be running on a hundred thousand records per month with potential for duplication/ommission on either side.
What's a poor newbie missing??
I'm doing something similar on a lesser volume by running sequential statements through an ASP script but performance is poor. I know SQL can do this, just not how to approach it.
Thanks for any guidance
Dale
I have two tables, one with data for one type of ID (call it key1) and a table where this ID (call it key2) is transformed to another. It is not one-to-one match with these types of ID and I want to check those key2 cases that have two or more key1 linked to it.
It is simple enough and for the easiest check I don't even need table1 to run it as table2 has both key1 and key2 variables.
However, not all doubles are of identical worth. Table1 (that has only key1) has a year variable. I am interested in doubles that have same year variable, ie. in table1 there are two key1 cases with the same year variable that are linked to one key2 case in table2.
So in essence in table1 I have key1, year and in table2 I have key1, key2 and I am interested in those key2-cases that have more than one key1 linked to it where years are the same.
SELECT query.key2
FROM (
SELECT DISTINCT a.key1, b.key2
FROM table1 AS a JOIN table2 AS b ON a.key1=b.key1 JOIN table1 AS c ON
a.key1=c.key1
WHERE a.year=c.year)
AS query
GROUP BY query.key2
HAVING COUNT(*)>1
I tried it joining table1 twice and fiddling around with various JOIN and WHERE clauses (the one on show being the simplest and most naive one) but the query still returns key2-doubles whose key1 cases are linked to different years. It is simple enough if you give a distinct year value in where clause (and drop second table1 join as unnecessary) but I don't want to go through all years manually one by one. I was thinking some kind of iterative loop that changes the value of the year in where clause could do the trick (and be heavy computationally) but I don't really know how to go around doing it, haven't done any loops in SQL ever.
Hi,
I have three tables:
1 Order Details
2 Product Info
3 Received Qty
The query is pretty simple however I'm getting incorrect results.
The query grabs a load of information (including a SUM statement) from the order details tbl.. this is INNER JOIN ed to the products tbl to match an ID field which grabs some extra info from the product info tbl.
all fairly straightforward and works without a problem..
However I now need to add in the received qty tbl (as the name suggests this keep a track of the qty's of items received)
I need to join this tbl to the order details tbl based on a unique ID from the orders tbl and then SUM together all of the entries in that received qty tbl for that item.
Result is I get a single record which shows the qty ordered (from the order details tbl), and the total received (from the received qty) tbl
These are held in a seperate tbl as an order can be deliveryed in several stages.
Here is my statement:
SELECT PDS_Login.Supplier_Products.ProductName, PDS_Login.Supplier_Products.ProductCode, dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.POID,
dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.PODetailsID, dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.Qty, dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.PricePerItem,
dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.PoDetailsStatus, dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.PoDateExpected, dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.PODateReceived,
SUM(dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.Qty * dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.PricePerItem) AS LineTotal, SUM(dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details_Received.Qty)
AS QtyReceived
FROM dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details INNER JOIN
PDS_Login.Supplier_Products ON dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.ProductID = PDS_Login.Supplier_Products.ProductID LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details_Received ON dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.PODetailsID = dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details_Received.PODetailsID
WHERE (dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.POID = @POID)
GROUP BY dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details_Received.Qty, PDS_Login.Supplier_Products.ProductName, PDS_Login.Supplier_Products.ProductCode,
dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.POID, dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.PODetailsID, dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.Qty, dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.PricePerItem,
dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.PoDetailsStatus, dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.PoDateExpected, dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.PODateReceived,
dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details_Received.Qty
The problem is, if there is more than one relating record in teh Received Qty tbl instead of that being added together as I want, two results appear...
It's obviously something simple but I can't seem to figure it out - anyone point me in the right direction?
I want to select all usernames from tlbUsers which practice a certain sport.I also have a table UsersAndSports:UserID intSportID intI therefore need an inner join statement:select username from(SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY au.LastActivityDate DESC) as RowNum,ud.username from tblusers usinner join tblUsersAndSports uas on uas.usercode=us.usercode and (uas.sportID=3 or uas.sportID=4)WHERE us.UserName <>'' )as MemberInfo WHERE RowNum between (@startRowIndex+1) AND (@startRowIndex+@maximumRows)The problem lies in the usage of the ROW_NUMBER command. I need that in order to effectively page through my records, but it also makes thatI cant make a distinct selection as each RowNum is unique....:SIn case the user would practice 2 sports, the query would return 2 rows...if I place a distinct in front of the username as such:select distinct username fromThe query would return each user only once...BUTBUTBUT: my startrowindex and maximumrows apply to the results that can be found in the MemberInfo selection..so lets say my startrowindex would be 0 and maximumrow 5if my 1st query (without distinct) was to return:johnjohnjohnjohnmikemikerobmy 2nd query (with distinct) would return:johnmikewhereas I want it to return:johnmikerobWhat can I do?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI would like to make inner join with results from different exec %procedureName% calls.
thanks.
I have a SELECT Statement that I am using that is pulling from two tables. There won't always be results in the second table so I made a LEFT OUTER JOIN. The problem I am having is that I need to have three conditions in there:WHERE (employee.emp_id = @emp_id) AND (request.requested_time_taken = 'FALSE') AND (request.request_end_date >= GETDATE()))The two conditions from the request table are causing the entire query to return NULL as the value. I need help trying get a value whether or not there are any results in the request table.Here is the full select statement:SELECT (SELECT SUM(ISNULL(request.request_duration, '0')) AS Expr1
FROM employee LEFT OUTER JOIN
request AS request ON employee.emp_id = request.emp_id
WHERE (employee.emp_id = @emp_id) AND (request.requested_time_taken = 'FALSE') AND (request.request_end_date >= GETDATE()))
AS dayspending
FROM employee AS employee_1 LEFT OUTER JOIN
request AS request_1 ON employee_1.emp_id = request_1.emp_id
WHERE (employee_1.emp_id = @emp_id)
GROUP BY employee_1.emp_id, employee_1.emp_begin_accrual, employee_1.emp_accrual_rate, employee_1.emp_fname, employee_1.emp_minitial,
employee_1.emp_lname
I have two queries as below;
SELECT EventID, Role, EventDuty, Qty, StartTime, EndTime, Hours
FROM dbo.tblEventStaffRequired;
and
SELECT EventID, Role, StartTime, EndTime, Hours, COUNT(ID) AS Booked
FROM tblStaffBookings
GROUP BY EventID, Role, StartTime, EndTime, Hours;
How can I join the results of the two by matching the columns EventID, Role, StartTime and EndTime in the two and have the following columns in output EventID, Role, EventDuty, Qty, StartTime, EndTime, Hours and Booked?
Hi,
I have a query written in SQL 2000 which returns incorrect result. The query uses left outer join and a view. I read an issue related to this in one of microsoft bug report in this article http://support.microsoft.com/kb/321541.
However, there's a slight difference in the sympton second bullet wherein instead of a expression the query returns a fixed string for one of the column value.
Although the issue mentioned in article seems to be fixed. The later one still seems to be reproducible even with Service Pack 4. However, this issue doesn't appear in SQL Server 2005.
Here's the query to reproduce this error.
Code Snippetcreate table t1 (pk1 int not null,primary key (pk1))
create table t2 (pk1 int not null,label1 varchar(10) not null,primary key (pk1))
go
insert into t1 values (1)
insert into t2 values (2, 'XXXXX')
go
create view V as
select pk1, 'ZZZZ' as label1 from t2
go
select A.pk1 as A_pk1, B.pk1 as B_pk1, B.label1 as B_label1
from t1 as A left outer join V as B on A.pk1 = B.pk1
go
This query is similar to the one mentioned in the article except that in the SELECT clause of CREATE VIEW statement I am passing a fixed value for column "label1".
I just want to confirm that this is an issue and no fix is available for this so far.
Regards,
Naresh Rohra.
I have a lookup table, as below. Each triggercode can have several service codes.
TriggerCodeServiceCode
BBRONZH BBRZFET
BBRONZH RDYNIP1
BBRONZP BBRZFET
BCSTICP ULDBND2
BCSTMCP RBNDLOC
I then have a table of accounts, and each account can have one to many service codes. This table also has the rate for each code.
AccountServiceCodeRate
11518801DSRDISC -2
11571901BBRZFET 5
11571901RBNDLOC 0
11571901CDHCTC 0
17412902CDHCTC1 0
14706401ULDBND2 2
14706401RBNDLOC 3
What I would like to end up with is a pivot table of each account, the trigger code and service codes attached to that account, and the rate for each.
I have been able to dynamically get the pivot, but I'm not joining correctly, as its returning every dynamic column, not just the columns of a trigger code. The code below will return the account and trigger code, but also every service code, regardless of which trigger code they belong to, and just show null values.
What I would like to get is just the service codes and the appropriate trigger code for each account.
SELECT @cols = STUFF((SELECT DISTINCT ',' + ServiceCode
FROM TriggerTable
FOR XML PATH(''), TYPE
).value('(./text())[1]', 'VARCHAR(MAX)')
,1,2,'')
[Code] ....
Hi
I have a strange issue here.
Both the input datasets of the merge join are sorted . Everything works fine if the dataset doesn't contain speacial characters like - (hipen).
This is the sorted dataset.ASI311_3ASI311_3ASI312ASI311ASIKit1ASIKit1
Merge Joiner has to look for ASI311 and finds it in the list and everything works as expected. But if the dataset is changed to
ASI311_3ASI311_3ASI-312ASI311ASIKit1ASIKit1
Then it doesn't find the ASI311 in the above dataset ?
Only change between the two datasets is the - (hipen) which is added in one of the field. Does SSIS has a differenent precedence of the special characters than that of the Database. Both the datasets are on SQLServer.
Can anyone point out the issue here?
Thankyou
Vidya
How do I search for and print all stored procedure names in a particular database? I can use the following query to search and print out all table names in a database. I just need to figure out how to modify the code below to search for stored procedure names. Can anyone help me out?
SELECT TABLE_SCHEMA + '.' + TABLE_NAME
FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES
WHERE TABLE_TYPE = 'BASE TABLE'
Greetings:
I have MSSQL 2005. On earlier versions of MSSQL saving a stored procedure wasn't a confusing action. However, every time I try to save my completed stored procedure (parsed successfully ) I'm prompted to save it as a query on the hard drive.
How do I cause the 'Save' action to add the new stored procedure to my database's list of stored procedures?
Thanks!
We recently upgraded to SQL Server 2005. We had several stored procedures in the master database and, rather than completely rewriting a lot of code, we just recreated these stored procedures in the new master database.
For some reason, some of these stored procedures are getting stored as "System Stored Procedures" rather than just as "Stored Procedures". Queries to sys.Objects and sys.Procedures shows that these procs are being saved with the is_ms_shipped field set to 1, even though they obviously were not shipped with the product.
I can't update the sys.Objects or sys.Procedures views in 2005.
What effect will this flag (is_ms_shipped = 1) have on my stored procedures?
Can I move these out of "System Stored Procedures" and into "Stored Procedures"?
Thanks!