How Can I Restrict Bandwidth Between To SQL Servers
Jul 23, 2005
Hi
I have two SQL2000 servers in different sites, once a day approximately
1M of data in the form of a large update is required to be transfered
between the 2. We have use of a 2M pipe between the servers but there
is no quality of service, the other users on the pipe are traders so
there must be no interruption in the quality of their bandwidth at any
time.
Is there any way of throttling back the data transfer between the two
servers to restrict its bandwidth use. Obviously we want to retain the
max bandwidth on our local network.
The pipe is administered by a seperate company so we do not have admin
access to their gateways, routers etc.. so a solution which we can
implement on our database servers would be the easiest.
I am not sure if this is the right newsgroup for this but any
information would be great
Thanks
Mark
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jun 16, 2007
Hi
I'm looking to deploy some SQL Server reports and I want to restrict the access that the users have. Currently when connecting to the reports site they have access to a lot of functionality through the header bar, for example
- Properties
- New Folder
- New Data Source
- My Subscriptions
- Site Settings
- Search
etc.
How can I disbale or hide all these options so that all the user sees is the list of reports?
Thanks in advance
Mark
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 18, 2003
I have scenerio that find out the Bandwitdh size between clint and server.
I wanted find out howmuch size of data recieveing from server at a time.
Any advice regarding this.
Thanks,
Ravi
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 30, 2007
I am building a SQL server on a Windows 2000 Server box. It has a public IP and we have 4 T1 lines. After I install SQL 2000 it will run for about 30 minutes and then it will take up all the bandwidth on the network to such a degree that my users are unable to access the internet. I have been troubleshooting this over the last couple of days. This morning I reinstalled SQL with just the default DB's and after 45 mins it brought the network down again. Any help on this would be greatly appreciated.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 3, 2007
Hi there SQL Team
I hope I’ve posted this in the right section.
We have a customer, call them customerA
CustomerA has just employed a new Chief Information Officer.
The New CIO would like to make a few changes to the current way we have things right now.
Bare with me as I explain our environment.
We have The following Servers
Application Server[FSS (Dual DC Xeon 2.33GHz CPU, 4GB RAM, 3x72GB hdd RAID]
Database Server [FSS (Dual DC Xeon 2.33GHz CPU, 4GB RAM, 3x72GB hdd RAID)]
Both the above servers sit in a fully fault tolerant environment with daily backups power generators etc etc etc.1000MB network everything work 100%
Now my question:
The new CIO would like to move the DB server out of this environment to a remote building downtown, and have the application server connect to this remote db server.
Is this advisable?
What are the required connection speeds, so that the end user does not have to wait for a response?
What is the recommended response time IIS should give?
Please also note that we are in South Africa and broadband is VERY expensive / unreliable.
The CIO would like to install a 2Mbit radio link from this building to the ISP I’m not sure on the cost, but do know that this type of link is very unstable,
Their failover will be a 512kb fixed line or diginet line. Cost about ZAR 8000.00 per month
The application is extremely data / graphs intensive as it contain property information.
I think they average about 16000 visitors daily, not a lot.
If anyone can give me any input i would appreciated.
Thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 28, 2005
Does anyone know a wayto compress data between two database connections over "low bandwidth" lines in order to speedup datatransfer?
Used connections are Oracle<->SQL2000 and SQL2000<->SQL2000.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 24, 2008
Hi
I am evaluating the possibility of replicating a database over a network to our HQ from the control site (one way). The original database is on SQL server.
The database is likely to grow to many terabytes so we would be using transactional replication.
The table to be replicated recieves about 500 records per second.
The table will probably consist of a record key (8 byte int), site ID (4 byte int), reading (8-byte float), and timestamp (8 byte timestamp). All up, 28 bytes + whatever overhead exists.
MINOR DETAIL:
The HQ's copy should be preferably no more than 1 hour behind the control site's. This would be a long-term setup that would last for many years. Our link is currently about 2 MB/s, and is fairly reliable.
QUESTIONS:
I'm guessing that (bytes/record)*(records/second) won't be the whole story. Does anyone have an estimate of the average data efficiency factor for transactional replication?
How would I go about calculating how much bandwidth would be needed? Is there a formulae hiding somewhere?
Thanks in advance.
Simon.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 21, 2008
Hi to all experts,
I have a server with about 50 databases and the server bandwidth usage is 15-30 Mbps.
I need to know which databse is consuming the bandwidth.
Can you tell me what is the best way (if any) to monitor bandwidth usage per database?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 1, 2006
All:
One of the new tests that we are running have to do with load testing an application with a constrained network pipe. I like this. One of my beefs has been related to stored procedures that return bloated result sets. This new set of tests potentially gives me some more amunition to use when I review stored procedures. A piece that I would like to produce as a result of this has to do with establishing an output bandwidth standard for our database servers. I have a few biased ideas but I would like to know if any of you have any similar pre-existing standards along this line. Any help?
Dave
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 11, 2008
Hi All,
I am setting up P2P replication for a high latency environment (although at 100MBit per sec, the bandwidth is not a serious issue ).
I have noticed that at high load, the bandwidth between Distribution and Subscriber servers maxes out at 1MBit per second (our network bandwidth is 100MBit per second).
This causes transactions to 'back up' and when the load reduces they 'catch up' and synchronise.
Does anyone know where this limitation of 1Mbs is being enforced and what is the way round it?
I have seen the -SubscriptionStreams NN parameter, but this is not applicable in P2P replication.
Any advice would be appreciated.
Thanks
Aasim
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 21, 2007
I have a report that was designed using SQL Reporting Services that sits on a SQL reporting server. It's nothing too exciting, it is essentially a three page application with legal jumbo on pages 2 and 3 and applicant data in fields on page 1.
We use rectangles to force page breaks to page 2 and to page 3.
When running the report on the report server, it shows and prints fine.
When running the report from the QA website internally, it shows and prints just fine.
When running the report from the production website from a machine internally, it shows and prints just fine.
When running the report from outside of the company network, the report is jacked. It obliterates large chunks of text, crams text together, and creates blank pages.
I need help in determining where I even begin with trouble shooting this!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 21, 2001
can anyone tell me if they know of a way to automate the update process from development servers to live server, with little interference from an administrator
I have a development team that are constantly updating their databases along with their ASP code, and want to publish changes an a weekly basis. They have asked me for a way to take their new structures, tables, procedures etc, and copy them to the live servers, but NOT to interfere with existing customer data.
Funny I know – and I hate the idea btw :(
Any references, contacts, 3rd party tool recommendations welcome,
Thanx,
Darren
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 27, 2007
I am in the middle of a major migraton project, moving from x86 SQL 2000 to IA64 SQL 2005. I have a business need to link to several legacy servers. I have a number of problems I am trying to solve.
1) Linking a Kerberos server to a non-Kerberos server.
2) Linking x64 or IA64 servers to x86 servers.
3) Linking SQL 2005 to SQL 2000.
Two of the errors I am encountering are:
------------------------------
TCP Provider: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host.
Login failed for user '(null)'. Reason: Not associated with a trusted SQL Server connection.
OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "SCDC250DB" returned message "Communication link failure".
(Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 10054)
------------------------------
And
------------------------------
The OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for the linked server "SCDC250DB" reported an error. Authentication failed.
Cannot initialize the data source object of OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "SCDC250DB".
OLE DB provider "SQLCLI" for linked server "SCDC250DB" returned message "Invalid authorization specification".
(Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 7399)
If someone has worked through these problems before, I would appreciate it if you could direct me to the relevant documentation to resolve these issues.
Thanks!
Brandon Forest
Database Administrator
Data & Web Services Team
Sutter Connect Information Technologyforesb@sutterhealth.org
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 11, 2007
What would be the best practice to prevent users who didn't create a record in sql from deleting? When a record is created I have the username who created the record in one of the fields. I was thinking maybe a query?
Thank you in advance.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Oct 5, 2004
I have an ETL product, every 30 minutes it loads maybe a coupla 100K records of various construction into an SQL Server Db (2000 SP3, on Win 2000 Std Server also Win 2003 Ent Server). It really hammers the Db with a combination of batch insert update and insert fallback to update etc. It does not use 100% CPU actually and is IO bound. Works a treat.
Now the problem, someone has built a .Net ADO based front end, and for the 5 minutes my product runs every 30 minutes they have a hope in hell of getting a reasonable response for their select queries. Now my take is that maybe I can delay for 5ms after each transaction I do to allow the other user processes a chance. But better maybe would be for my ETL product Db user to have a lower priority than other Db users.
What is the best way to achieve this end? If I understood more about how SQL Server prioritizes users and their requests it might help. (round robin?)
Thx.
David
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 5, 2004
I have an ETL product, every 30 minutes it loads maybe a coupla 100K records of various construction into an SQL Server Db (2000 SP3, on Win 2000 Std Server also Win 2003 Ent Server). It really hammers the Db with a combination of batch insert update and insert fallback to update etc. It does not use 100% CPU actually and is IO bound. Works a treat.
Now the problem, someone has built a .Net ADO based front end, and for the 5 minutes my product runs every 30 minutes they have a hope in hell of getting a reasonable response for their select queries. Now my take is that maybe I can delay for 5ms after each transaction I do to allow the other user processes a chance. But better maybe would be for my ETL products user to have a lower priority than other users.
What is the best way to achieve this end? If I understood more about how SQL Server prioritizes users and their requests it might help. (round robin?)
Thx.
David
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 28, 2008
Hi
Is it possible to restrict what IP numbers can access a sql server 2005 (can this do done in sql server 2005)?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2006
Hi guys, say i wrote a query that returns 1,000 records.. what kinda query could i write that only returns say the first 50 records of the 1,000 recs..
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 21, 2005
Hi
I need to restrict delete from one table by any user of SQL. How can we do this? This is our master table and we dont want any one to delete data from this table.
Thanks
Bala
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 12, 2001
Hi,
Is there a way to prevent new users from accessing a SQL2000 db (like to put it into DBO mode) while leaving current users finish their running jobs.
I tried Alter Database and sp_dboptions and both in SQL2000 requires to close all current users. It was working in SQL7 but not in 2000.
Thanks
AAA
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 19, 2001
Is there a switch in 7.0 that I can set if
I don't want users to see a certain column in
a table.
Ex: TableA(column1, column2, column3)
If they do a select * from tableA
they will receive information on all three columns,
I don't want them to see the last column3.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 7, 1999
Is there any way of not allowing users with MS Access from using it to connect to a SQL 7 server? Basically, no connection to SQL through MS Access should be allowed. Any ideas?
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 27, 2005
Hello Everybody,
I need some help.
When we install the Database at the clients end, the client can see all
the SQL tables, views and stored procedure in the Enterprise Manager.
Is there a way via which you can restrict the client from viewing the
tables in SQL Enterprise manager?
I hope you understand my question.
I would be oblidged if my friends could help me...
Thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 13, 2006
Does anyone know how can we prevent users from creating offline/local cube (in Excel) from our OLAP/Analysis Service server ?
Thank you.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 25, 2008
My users have sa rights to our SQL servers. I want to restrict their access to the C: so that they do not restore DB's there.
I thought at first I could create a Windows user that runs the SQL Service then grant them read rights to the C:. This does not give the user enough rights to start the service.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Hello All,I'm using SQL Server 2000 and wish to restrict the user login to oneinstance only. Is this possible? Is this wise?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Hello -I have over 100 MSSQL Databases on my SQL SERVER. How do I restrictall the MSSQL databases and its transaction logs to 100 MB.Can someone help me with any script which will do that.Thanks,Rubal Jainwww.Rubal.net
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 6, 2008
Here is what I need to do, maybe someone could tell me what to do.
I need to create a login (I got that part) and then limit that login to only be able to see one of the databases on the server. So this is what I'm looking for.
user1 logs in to the server
user1 can only see the database I want them to see
and can not see anything else, no msdb, no tempdb, no security, no management etc.
I also need this user to be read only (only able to run select statements)
and this user will not be the owner of the database
Please help i'm pulling my hair out
Thanks Ahead of time
View 8 Replies
View Related
Dec 16, 2006
While web hosting I use Sql Server 2000 as the database. Imagine I have hosted 3 Web Sites. All these 3 users want to modify/update their designs. What I did is I created respective 3 users having access to the respective databases only. So that they can registerd the ip and add to the Sql Server 2000 Enterprise Manager. These users are able to access their own databases only. But all these 3 users are able to access the default databases like master,pubs etc. How to restrict this.
Also suggest which is the optimal way to give control to the respective users while using Sql Server 2000.
====Suresh, P.R, Postal Training Centre, Mysore.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 26, 2008
My users have sa rights to our SQL servers. I want to restrict their access to the C: so that they do not restore DB's there.
I thought I could create a Windows user that runs the SQL Service then grant them read rights to the C:. This does not give the user enough rights to start the service.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 4, 2006
Hi
Are there any way to use foreign key in MS-SQL Express with ON DELETE RESTRICT like other databases?
Best Regards
Igor Sane
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 9, 2004
Hi,
ive a table of over 90,000 records . is ther any method for restricting the number of records returned by a SELECT query
i want to implement a query system which will give me the first 50 records, next 50 ,... and so on
can ne body help ?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 2, 2007
In SQL2005, is it possible to restrict incoming sql or windows authentication logins by source hostname or IP address? Perhaps using endpoints?
We are currently using hosts file on the db server as a temporary solution, but the SA will not allow us to use this as a permanent solution.
The app team I support is asking me to build an "idiot proof" database so that an Dev or Test app server they may configure, doesn't unintentionally connect to the Production database and damage/alter data.
Don't worry, I've already asked if they can't follow some kind of M&P's to prevent this kind of silly behavior, but they insist on DBA team creating a bullet-proof database that can outsmart app developers who try to attempt something dumb like this.
Any ideas or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
TIA,
Phil
Phil Streiff
View 2 Replies
View Related
