How Can Readers Block Readers In SQL Server 2005
May 26, 2008
Hello All,
Greetings!!!
Due to certain constraints on my Table, I am not able to place unique Key constraint on it.
So I have take care about the uniqueness in my T-SQL code. I don't want to use the serializable transaction isolation level as it will result in frequent deadlocks.
I want some means by which one select will block other select.
Can this be done in SQL Server. I tried using TablockX along with holdlock as Table hint, but still the Selects does not block other select.
Will appreciate if you can resolve this issue
Thanks in Advance,
Mitesh Shah
MCTS- SQL Server 2005
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jan 9, 2007
When multiple readers are waiting on a message from the same queue, I would expect that the reader that has been waiting the longest would be the first to pick up a message. However, I'm shocked to discover that the opposite seems to be true; in my tests I'm showing that the reader that has been waiting the least time picks up a message first! This seems totally counter-intuitive, and I'd like to know why it's working this way. This implementation will cause a lot more reader timeouts to occur than a properly queued method. For instance, assume that I have two readers, each using a one minute timeout. Reader #1 starts waiting, and reader #2 is busy for another 20 seconds before it starts waiting. 39 seconds later a message comes in and reader #2 will pick it up, leaving reader #1 to time out one second later! I would much rather have reader #1 pick up the message and reader #2 continue to wait for 20 more seconds.
I'm considering filing a bug on Connect about this, but I thought I'd post here first and see if I can get an answer...
Following is the script I'm using to test:
---Setup / Window #1---
--------------------------------------
CREATE DATABASE SimpleSSB
GO
USE SimpleSSB
GO
--Create a database master key
CREATE MASTER KEY
ENCRYPTION BY PASSWORD = 'onteuhoeu'
GO
--Create a message type
CREATE MESSAGE TYPE Simple_Msg
VALIDATION = EMPTY
GO
--Create a contract based on the message type
CREATE CONTRACT Simple_Contract
(Simple_Msg SENT BY INITIATOR)
GO
--create a queue
CREATE QUEUE Simple_Queue
GO
--Create a service
CREATE SERVICE Simple_Service
ON QUEUE Simple_Queue
(Simple_Contract)
GO
--------------------------------------
---Go start the other windows now---
---Readers: Windows #2-n ---
--------------------------------------
USE SimpleSSB
GO
WAITFOR
(
RECEIVE *
FROM Simple_Queue
), TIMEOUT 300000
--------------------------------------
---Start at least two readers, then do---
--------------------------------------
--send a message...
DECLARE @h UNIQUEIDENTIFIER
BEGIN DIALOG CONVERSATION @h
FROM SERVICE Simple_Service
TO SERVICE 'Simple_Service'
ON CONTRACT Simple_Contract
WITH ENCRYPTION=OFF;
SEND ON CONVERSATION @h
MESSAGE TYPE Simple_Msg
GO
--------------------------------------
... the last reader you've started will pick up the message first. Note I'm testing on 9.0.3033, in case that matters.
Thanks!
View 7 Replies
View Related
Nov 29, 2005
I have created a queue with automatic execution of a stored proc with the attribute Max_Queue_Readers = 5. While processing data, I can select from the queue and see that messages are backed up in the queue. I have two questions:
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 26, 2007
In a situation where messages are coming in faster than they can be processed, at what point will service broker start up another queue_reader? Also, how do you prevent table locking if part of the processing of that message involves inserting or updating data in a table? We are experiencing this problem because of the high number of messages coming through, and I'm not sure what the best solution is - does service broker have some built-in support for preventing contention on a table when multiple readers are running? Or maybe a pattern that can be used to get around it?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 11, 2006
Hello,
This is info that I am still not certain about and I just need to make sure, my gut feeling is correct:
A.
When a procedure is triggered upon reception of a message in a queue, what happens when the procedure fails and rolls back?
1. Message is left on the Queue.
2. is the worker procedure triggered again for the same message by the queue?
3. I am hoping the Queue keeps on triggering workers until it is empty.
My scenario is that my queue reader procedure only reads one message at a time, thus I do not loop to receive many messages.
B.
For my scenario messages are independent and ordering does not matter.
Thus I want to ensure my Queue reader procedures execute simultaneously. Is reading the Top message in one reader somehow blocking the queue for any other reader procedures? I.e. if I have BEGIN TRANSACTION when reading messages of the Queue, is that effectively going prevent many reader procedures working simultaneously. Again, I want to ensure that Service broker is effectively spawning procedures that work simultaneously.
Thank you very much for the time,
Lubomir
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 3, 2014
I have the following stored procedure to test scope of variables
alter proc updatePrereq
@pcntr int,
@pmax int
as
begin
[Code] ....
In the above script @i is declare in the if block only when the @pcntr value is 1. Assume the above stored procedure is called 5 times from this script
declare @z int
set @z = 1
declare @max int
set @max = 5
while @z <= @max
begin
exec dbo.updatePrereq @z, @max
set @z = @z + 1
end
go
As i said earlier `@i` variable exists only when `@pcntr` is `1`. Therefore when i call the stored procedure for the second time and so forth the control cannot enter the if block therefore @i variable wouldn't even exist. But the script prints the value in `@i` in each iteration, How comes this is possible should it throw an error saying `@i` variable does not exist when `@pcntr` values is greater than `1`?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 30, 2006
I am building a web app using VS2005 and SQL 2005 I would like to use the Caching Application Block to cache objects from my BLL. I was wondering if there is a way of utilizing the build in SQLDependency in SQL 2005 with the Caching Application Block??? Does anybody have tried this, are there any samples on the web???
Thanks,
Newbie
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 17, 2007
Hello our organization has never had any problems getting users to connect to our SQL servers but we have grown a lot over the past year or two. Does SQL Server actually block connections if they go over the license limit? I don't have access to the servers to see the model used but I have been asked to look into this. I couldn't find any information on this so I decided to ask you guys. Thanks in advance.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 26, 2005
Forgive me if this is a stupid question.
How do you use a Server Side block cursor?
Lets say I have a db of 250,000 items and I want to retrieve the data 100 rows at a time.
How would I do this (using a block cursor, not in general)
thanks,
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 8, 2008
Is possible block access to sql server database, from hostame (pc name). I know only the hostname and not the user.
Is possible?
Thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
HiI have a question regarding the SQL Server(SQL Server 7) port 1433.Some body is trying to hack into our Windows 2000 server through port1433. Is there a way i can close this port? I tried using a toolcalled Ipsecpol.exe ( Internet Protocol Security Policies Tool). Butwhen we run netstat, it still looks like they are able to connect tothe server using port 1433. Has anyone come across this problem? Iwould appreciate it very much if somebody could send in anysuggestions regarding this.Thanks,Ann
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 10, 2015
I need to run a script in production that adds primary key to a table. Because table is large, I can't run it in one shot, the log file is not so large to accommodate it. Instead, I created a new table with same structure plus new surrogate primary key, and I populate it in a cursor loop.
I already ran it many times in test server, and no problems with that. But the problem will be in production when applications will be accessing this table and try to insert/update it while I am running my loop.
So I am looking for a solution how to block users to access this table, it's OK if they receive an error. Setting database to single user mode will not work because I don't want to block them from all the rest tables in this database.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 17, 2015
I want to assign consecutive numbers to a block of data where block of data is based on days consecutive to each other i.e., one day apart.
Date format is: YYYY-MM-DD
Data:
TestId TestDate
----------- -----------------------
1 2011-07-21 00:00:00.000
1 2011-07-22 00:00:00.000
1 2011-07-27 00:00:00.000
1 2011-07-29 00:00:00.000
1 2011-07-30 00:00:00.000
1 2011-07-31 00:00:00.000
[Code] ....
My Attempt:
WITH cte AS
(
SELECTTestId,
TestDate,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER
(
PARTITION BYTestId
[Code] .....
Expected Output:
TestId TestDate OrderId
----------- ----------------------- --------------------
1 2011-07-21 00:00:00.000 1
1 2011-07-22 00:00:00.000 1
1 2011-07-27 00:00:00.000 2
1 2011-07-29 00:00:00.000 3
1 2011-07-30 00:00:00.000 3
[Code] ....
The OrderId is the column I am trying to obtain using my following cte code, but I can't work around it.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Mar 18, 2015
I want to assign consecutive numbers to a block of data, where block of data is based on days consecutive to each other i.e., one day apart.
Date format is: YYYY-MM-DD
Data:
TestId TestDate
----------- -----------------------
1 2011-07-21 00:00:00.000
1 2011-07-22 00:00:00.000
1 2011-07-27 00:00:00.000
1 2011-07-29 00:00:00.000
1 2011-07-30 00:00:00.000
[Code] ....
My Attempt:
WITH cte AS
(
SELECTTestId,
TestDate,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER(
PARTITION BYTestId
[Code] ....
Expected Output:
TestId TestDate OrderId
----------- ----------------------- --------------------
1 2011-07-21 00:00:00.000 1
1 2011-07-22 00:00:00.000 1
1 2011-07-27 00:00:00.000 2
1 2011-07-29 00:00:00.000 3
[Code] ....
The OrderId is the column I am trying to obtain using my following cte code, but I can't work around it.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Dec 18, 2007
Hi
This is the code which I have written in code window.
Public Shared Function CalcLocalFactor(ByVal CalcLifeCode As Integer, ByVal CalcFiscalAge As Integer, ByVal CalcLifeYearsUsed As Double, ByVal CalcLocConvention As String, ByVal CalcSRate As Integer) As Double
Dim locCalcFiscalAge As Integer = 0
Dim locFactor As Double= 1.0
Dim locFactor1 As Double = 1.0
Dim REM1 As Integer = 1
Dim DEP As Double = 0
Dim YR As Integer
Dim HALF_YEAR As Double
Dim LINEAR As Double
Dim MACR As Double
If CalcFiscalAge > CalcLifeCode + 1 Then
locCalcFiscalAge = 0
locFactor = 1.0
End If
If (CalcLocConvention <> "HALF-YEAR" And CalcLifeYearsUsed < CalcLifeCode) Then
locFactor = Math.Round((CalcLifeYearsUsed / CalcLifeCode), 4)
End If
If (CalcLocConvention = "HALF-YEAR") Then
for YR = 1 to CalcFiscalAge step 1
If YR = CalcLifeCode + 1 Then
locFactor1 = 1
Exit For
End If
If (YR = 1 Or YR = CalcFiscalAge) Then
HALF_YEAR = 2
Else
HALF_YEAR = 1
End If
LINEAR = Math.Round(REM1 / (CalcLifeCode - YR + 1.5) / HALF_YEAR, 4)
MACR = Math.Round(REM1 / CalcLifeCode * CalcSRate / HALF_YEAR, 4)
If MACR >= LINEAR Then
DEP = MACR
Else
DEP = LINEAR
End If
locFactor1 = locFactor1 + DEP
REM1 = 1 - locFactor1
locFactor = locFactor1
Next
End If
Return locFactor
End Function
I'm calling this code in a Report Parameter like below:
=Code.CalcLocalFactor(Parameters!CalcLifeCode.Value,Parameters!CalcFiscalAge.Value,Parameters!CalcLifeYearsUsed.Value,Parameters!CalcLifeYearsUsed.Value, Parameters!CalcSRate.Value )
It is working fine for the first record where as for other records, the value is not getting changed. i.e. the first records value is coming repeatedly for all other records also.
How can I dynamically change the parameter values of the function?
Parameter is not accepting directly the field names, hence I used other parameter to initialize the field and used that parameter for this.
Ex. Parameter Name ; FieldPurchDate (internal) FieldName : PURCHDATE
Other parameter: FieldInDate (internal) FieldName : InDate
While initializing the new parameter CalcPurchDate,, I used an expression for this: Parameters!CalcFiscalAge.Value
=iif(Parameters!FieldPurchDate.Value is nothing, Parameters!FieldInDate.Value,Parameters!FieldPurchDate.Value)
and using this CalcPurchDate for processing of the parameter:
These are some of the things , I am doing ....
Please let me know how to fix this issue...
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Radhika
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 8, 2008
I've written a couple blocks but I have no idea when it comes to this one.
Create a PL/SQL block to retrieve the last name and department ID if each employee from the EMPLOYEES table
for those employees whose EMPLOYEE_ID is less than 114. From the values retreived from the employees table, populate two PL/SQL tables,
one to store the records of the employee last names and the other to store the records of their department IDs.
Using a loop, retreive the employee name information and salary infromation from the PL/SQL tables and doisplay it in the window,
using DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE. Display these details for the first 15 employees in the PL/SQL tables.
Any help helps
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 18, 2006
If I've got a 64-bit OS such as Windows XP Professional x64 Edition running and I have the SQL Server 2005 Express Edition, is AES permittable or does TRIPLEDES still need to be used?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 10, 2008
Hello,
I have been experiencing a lot of blocking activity in my database. My trace results show that the following extended stored procedures sp_prepexec and sp_cursorfetch are executed by both the user causing the block and the user tha is blocked. Any ideas as to how to rectify this situation will be appreciated.
Regards,
Albert
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 11, 2006
HI,
i'm trying to execute some sql using the Try.. Catch blocks.
Following code does not execute in Catch Block
Begin
begin try
insert into dbo.Test values (1,'aaa')
-- here we are inserting int value in identity field...
END TRY
Begin catch
PRINT 'TEST'
SELECT
ERROR_NUMBER() AS ErrorNumber,
ERROR_SEVERITY() AS ErrorSeverity,
ERROR_STATE() as ErrorState,
ERROR_PROCEDURE() as ErrorProcedure,
ERROR_LINE() as ErrorLine,
ERROR_MESSAGE() as ErrorMessage;
END Catch
End
GO
Whereas the following block works fine and the Catch block executes.
Begin
begin try
Select 1/0
--This causes an error.
END TRY
Begin catch
PRINT 'TEST'
SELECT
ERROR_NUMBER() AS ErrorNumber,
ERROR_SEVERITY() AS ErrorSeverity,
ERROR_STATE() as ErrorState,
ERROR_PROCEDURE() as ErrorProcedure,
ERROR_LINE() as ErrorLine,
ERROR_MESSAGE() as ErrorMessage;
END Catch
End
GO
Any idea why is it so?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 5, 2008
Can anyone guide me to write check block in SQL Server?
I Mean if blocking occurs, just inform people.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 18, 2008
Hi there! I need such thing: I have a data in Table A. When I get this data, I also increment this data by one, what I want is block Table A in order to other people will not get access to data.. I think about transactions, but are transactions reaaly blocks a table's content?
P.S. For example in MySQL there are Lock table command for blocking table for reading/writing. I need such thing/
Thanks
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jul 3, 2007
Hi to everybody,
i have this problem.
sometimes a process in my SQL Server 2005 (upd 2) is blocked from itself. If I find in monitor it wait for a lock_M_Sch_M on a temporary table as you can see from
select * from sys.dm_tran_locks where request_session_id=51 and request_status <> 'GRANT'
resorce type : OBJECT
resource id : 218899226
request mode : Sch-M
request status WAIT
request_session id : 51
request life time : 33554432
or from
SELECT * FROM sys.dm_os_waiting_tasks WHERE SESSION_ID=51
waiting task address : 0x0000000000C2F198
session id : 51
wait type : LCK_M_SCH_M
resource address : 0x0000000201C71300
blocking task address : 0x0000000000C2F198
blocking session id = 51
resource description objectlock lockPartition=0 objid=218899226 subresource=FULL dbid=2 id=lock80d04900 mode=Sch-S associatedObjectId=218899226
I resolve this problem only with restart of sql server . that clear tempdb and eliminate this process
I think is not a problem about latch present from sql server 2000 sp4 (I read some document abount this problem)
So I haven't idea how to resolve this problem and how to kill this kind of process without to restart sql server
thanks in advance
Luca
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2007
hi there,
to retrieve more then one record with a cursor we can use block cursor, so we have to set the cursor attribute SQL_ATTR_ROWSET_SIZE to some number...i am not getting any code example on this.
do anyone know this???
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 12, 2006
Hi:
one of our study group members noticed a strange behavior and has the following question. Any thoughts are appreciated.
I am unable to understand as to why the CATCH block is not executed when an INSERT is made
On table T3 which is dropped after the first transaction.
The severity of Insert into t3 values (3) is Msg 208, Level 16, State 1, Line 2
Invalid object name 't3'.
BOL says TRY€¦CATCH constructs do not trap the following conditions:
Warnings or informational messages with a severity of 10 or lower.
Errors with severity of 20 or higher that terminate the SQL Server Database Engine task processing for the session. If an error occurs with severity of 20 or higher and the database connection is not disrupted, TRY€¦CATCH will handle the error.
Here is the script.
use tempdb
go
create table t1 (a int)
create table t2 (b int)
create table t3 (c int)
Begin tran
Insert into t1 values (1)
Insert into t2 values (2)
Insert into t3 values (3)
IF @@error <> 0
Rollback tran
else
commit tran
-------------------------------------------------------------
Select * from t1
Select * from t2
Select * from t3
-------------------------------------------------------------
Drop table t3
-------------------------------------------------------------
Set xact_abort on
Begin try
Begin tran insertNow
Insert into t1 values (1)
Insert into t2 values (2)
save tran insertNow
Insert into t3 values (3)
commit tran insertNow
End try
Begin Catch
IF (XACT_STATE()) = -1
BEGIN
PRINT 'The transaction is in an uncommittable state.' +
' Rolling back transaction.'
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION insertNow
END;
-- Test if the transaction is active and valid.
IF (XACT_STATE()) = 1
BEGIN
PRINT 'The transaction is committable.' +
' Committing transaction.'
COMMIT TRANSACTION insertNow
END
End Catch
View 9 Replies
View Related
Oct 2, 2006
Hi all,
here my question :
I have 2 applications.
connection 1.
one does select max(grp) from orv and one does select max(grp) from orh. orh is the historical file from orv. We did this to know which is the greather grp between these 2 files.
After having did this, we add 1 at grp field.
we insert into orv the record max(grp) + 1
connection 2.
an other application could insert at the same time record in this table orv with same parameters.
my problem is the following. I need to block record in orv table either on the select ( connection 1) or Insert ( connection 2) to avoid having select max(grp) + 1 on orv at connection 1 and Insert a record into orv at connection 2.
I believe I need to use HOLDLOCK, UPDLOCK.
but I have not the habitude to use them.
Can I do this ?
connection 1
select max(grp) from orv WITH HOLDLOCK
connection 2
what should I use to avoid lock when I need to insert into orv. ?
thanks for your quick answer
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 11, 2008
Ho do I clear a kill process blocking others to run
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 18, 2004
Hello, everyone:
There are a lot of Access and Excel tables linked to my SQL Server (SQL2K SP3 on W2K). The end users update those likned tables. I am wondering if there is the block problem. If yes, how to prevent that? Thanks.
ZYT
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 27, 2005
hi,
i've performed a test on 2 machines based on the topic above, but it doesn't seem like blocking each other... This is the context...
I've created a table call TEST_DEL i.e.
quote:CREATE TABLE test_del
(v_id INT,
desc CHAR(3)
)
In machine 1, i'm login as USER 1 and try to insert a set of records into the table
quote:
Machine 1
~~~~
BEGIN
DECLARE @li_num int,
@li_start int
SET @li_num = 100000
SET @li_start = 1
WHILE @li_start < @li_num
BEGIN
INSERT INTO test_del VALUES (@li_start, 'zzz', 'xxx')
IF (@li_start > @li_num)
BREAK
ELSE
SET @li_start = @li_start + 1
CONTINUE
END
END
In machine 2, i login in as USER 2 to retrieve the records at the same time...
quote:
SELECT * FROM test_del
but, the system still allow me to retrieve the records at the same time... May i know when will "Writer block reader, reader block writer" occur and in what situation
Thanks in advance
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 10, 2006
Can anyone give a template for a stored procedure which involves a transaction and has a TRY CATCH block too...
Thanks in advance.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 14, 2006
I am writing some code generation stuff and I am trying to get a scriptlike this to work:IF (something)BEGINCREATE PROCEDURE WhateverASSELECT 1 as oneENDBut it complains about this, so I am guessing that I can't put thecreate prodcedure in an IF block.Does anyone know of a work around for this?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 5, 2008
Hi experts,
I have a job that has several steps.
One of the steps is of type T-SQL. I have an IF...ELSE block in it. If the if statement is true...perform an action.
Else exit from the job reporting failure.
I would like to know what sql stmts should i use to exit from the job (in the ELSE block)
I tried to use EXIT in the else stmt but it is not exiting from the job step.
Thanks in advance
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 4, 2006
I'm working on a stored procedure which includes an IF statement at the end of the procedure which appends my sql call with two lines. But I'm getting an error that probably comes from the fact that I have a nested BEGIN END block in my overall procedure. Can anyone tell me if my assumption is correct and help polish of the syntax?
The error I'm getting is:
Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure payments_sp, Line 55
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'AND'.
and the sql code looks like this:
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[payments_sp]
-- Add the parameters for the stored procedure here
@payment_type varchar(15),
@mydate smalldatetime
AS
BEGIN
-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
-- interfering with SELECT statements.
SET NOCOUNT ON;
-- Insert statements for procedure here
DECLARE @myBool1 tinyint, @myBool12 tinyint
SET @myBool1 = 1
IF (@payment_type = 'CODE1' OR @payment_type = 'CODE4')
SET @myBool1 = 1
ELSE
-- the payment type must be 'CODE1' or 'CODE2'
-- set the value to false
SET @myBool1 = 0
IF (@payment_type = 'CODE3' OR @payment_type = 'CODE4')
SET @myBool12 = 1
ELSE
SET @myBool12 = 0
SELECT
SUM(Mydatabase.dbo.[PAYMENTS].[AMT_RECD])
FROM Mydatabase.dbo.[PAYMENTS]
INNER JOIN Mydatabase.dbo.[ACCT]
ON Mydatabase.dbo.[PAYMENTS].[SOME_UID] = Mydatabase.dbo.[ACCT].[SOME_UID]
WHERE Mydatabase.dbo.[ACCT].[CLIENT] = 'MY CLIENT'
AND Mydatabase.dbo.[PAYMENTS].[DATE_RECD] = @mydate
AND Mydatabase.dbo.[PAYMENTS].[BOOL] = @myBool1
AND Mydatabase.dbo.[PAYMENTS].[SOURCE] != 'val1'
AND Mydatabase.dbo.[PAYMENTS].[SOURCE] != 'val2'
AND Mydatabase.dbo.[PAYMENTS].[SOURCE] != 'val3'
IF (@payment_type = 'CODE3' OR @payment_type = 'CODE4')
BEGIN
AND Mydatabase.dbo.[PAYMENTS].[SOURCE] != 'val4'
AND Mydatabase.dbo.[PAYMENTS].[SOURCE] != 'val5'
END
END
GO
SET ANSI_NULLS OFF
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER OFF
GO
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 21, 2006
SELECT src_terrier.Areacode, src_terrier.siteref, src_terrier.estatename, src_terrier.Securitised, src_terrier.unitref, src_terrier.unittype, src_terrier.unittype_count, src_terrier.tenantname, src_terrier.tenantstatus, src_terrier.tenantstatus_count, src_terrier.unitstatus, src_terrier.unitstatus_count, src_terrier.floortotal, src_terrier.floortotocc, src_terrier.initialvacarea, src_terrier.initialvacnet, src_terrier.TotalRent, src_terrier.NetRent, src_terrier.FinalRtLsincSC, src_terrier.ErvTot, src_terrier.tenancyterm, src_terrier.landact, src_terrier.datadate, src_div_mgr.div_mgr, src_portfolio_mgr.portfolio_mgr, src_centre_list.propcat
FROM src_terrier INNER JOIN src_centre_list ON src_terrier.siteref = src_centre_list.Site_Ref AND src_terrier.Areacode = src_centre_list.Division INNER JOIN src_div_mgr ON src_centre_list.Division = src_div_mgr.division INNER JOIN src_portfolio_mgr ON src_centre_list.Portfolio_no = src_portfolio_mgr.portfolio_no
WHERE (src_terrier.datadate = @dt_src_date) AND (@chr_div is null or src_terrier.Areacode = @chr_div) AND (@vch_portfolio_no is null or src_centre_list.Portfolio_no = @vch_portfolio_no) AND (@vch_prop_cat is null or src_centre_list.propcat = @vch_prop_cat)
How can I modify this function in two ways
1. I want the value of src_terrier.siteref to be matched to a different table src_tbl_budget.siteref. I want all rows in src_terrier.siteref and only the one row from the new table where the siteref is matched.
2. Also part of the new query, not only do I want it to match the siteref, I also want it to only match the mm/yyyy of the parameter entered (src_terrier.datadate = @dt_src_date) in the WHERE statement.
Is that any simpler?
Regards
Toni Chaffin
aka Toni
View 6 Replies
View Related
