I am doing some SELECT queries on my database through ASP, but for example, I only want to return the 50 most recent entries that match the criteria. Is there any easy way to limit the number of results returned?
I am building a simple full text search engine for my site and I was wondering how would I retrieve rows 11-20 of the search result. This is required because I want to show my results only 10 at a time, like google does for instance. My query is as follows -
select top 10 ft_tbl.url, ft_tbl.title, ft_tbl.body, ft_tbl.date, (key_tbl.rank) from mytable as ft_tbl inner join freetexttable(mytable, (url, title, body), '".$searchstring."', 10) as key_tbl on ft_tbl.id = key_tbl.[key] order by (key_tbl.rank) DESC
In MySQL I would use LIMIT but I believe that doesnt exist in MS SQL
I'm busy writing a local site search engine that searches through a sql server database and I want to know how or what is the correct sql syntax to use in order to limit the amount of results a page loads at a time? The idea is obviously similar to something like google where you only see a certain amount of results first and then click at the botom for the next eg. 10 results.
The second question is how do I, after the first page with the first set of results that were shown, "clear" the second page of the previous html in order to show the next set of results? To give you an idea what my code looks like at the moment. Please don't kill me if the code is done a bit a lame, because I'm still learning.
resTextDescription2 = "myFile.txt does not exist!"; }
//determine whether male or female in order to display correct sign if ( resGender == "Male") resGender = "Male_sign_1.jpg"; else resGender = "Female_sign_1.jpg";
//determine whether 'want' and 'have' children and convert to correct words for display if ( resHaveChildren == "have kids" ) resHaveChildren = "Yes"; else resHaveChildren = "No";
//create a connection conClient = new SqlConnection( @"Server=THALIONTHALION;Integrated Security=SSPI;database=DateGame" );
//select statement strSelect = "Select userName From [client] Where userName=@username and userPassword=@userpassword"; cmdSelect = new SqlCommand( strSelect, conClient );
Hi,I need to limit results in the following query type:http://www.somewhere.com/php/sql-a....ql_order=&pos=1I found a reference that says I should be able to use LIMIT x[,y], butI don't know where/exactly how to add that to the string. Once I knowwhat it's supposed to look like, and can write something to generateit.If someone could post an example using the above and limiting theoutput to 100 records starting at position 1, that would be great.
I have a simple ForEach SMO Enumerator that returns the names of all the databases in the server identified by the SMO connection manager. I would like to populate the ForEach collection with just a subset of the names, based on some simple pattern matching. In his helpful book Integration Services, Kirk Haselden indicates that this can be done directly in the Enumerate field by adding qualifiers. However, I'm at a loss in regards to syntax.
What I have is: SMOEnumObj[@Name='Databases']/SMOEnumType[@Name='Names'] which returns the database names
What I want is to limit the names returned to those where Left(DBName,5) == "abcdb" (for example).
I have tried adding some test expressions to the Enumerate field, however, the URN is constructed based on the properties of a combination of the Connection Manager and Enumerate fields, and I'm just created invalid URNs.
Hi, Here's my problem. I have an Area Chart, and I need to plot more than 300,000 records. Problem is RS cannot seem to handle this huge dataset. It would retrieve for 20mins, then after that it will just have an error "Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage". I am not encountering this if I just have a few records to plot. Please help
Processing Association Rules model on SQL 2005 Standard edition produced following error:
"Error (Data mining): The 'WO_3' mining model has 6690 attributes. This number of attributes exceeds the attribute limit of 5000 allowed by the current version of the algorithm associated with the mining model."
I am having a bit of a problem trying to limit a number of columns in a matrix appearing on a page.
At the moment, I have a dataset that lists the month and the mail packages that were sent during the month The matrix works great HOWEVER, if there were more than 8 months in the matrix columns, it does not break and would make the page look like a huge landscape page.
I am trying to limit the number of columns appearing (this is the months column) on the matrix so that the pages stay in a potrait position. IE: every 8 columns appear on one page. Is there an option or an expression I could use in the Matrix ? Thanks!
Is there a limit of how many rows a table can have in SQL compact Edition? I didn't find anything in the documentation, but I get regularly a funny error message "Expression evaluation caused an overflow. [ Name of function (if known) = ]" when I try to create record number 32768 (is equal to 2 to the power of 15).
Is there a way to specify how many bars to display on a bar chart? And if the data set has more than the specified number of bars, then display another bar chart (on the next page) with the remaining bars?
Anyone know if it is possible to limit the number of selections in a multi value parameter? Eg: There are 50 values in the drop down combo, but I want the user to be able to select a maximum of 10?
In my ASP page, when I select an option from the drop down list, it has to get the records from the database stored procedure. There are around 60,000 records to be fetched. It throws an exception when I select this option. I think the application times out due to the large number of records. Could some tell me how to limit the number of rows to be returned to avoid this problem. Thanks. Query SELECT @SQLTier1Select = 'SELECT * FROM dbo.UDV_Tier1Accounts WHERE CUSTOMER IN (SELECT CUSTOMERNUMBER FROM dbo.UDF_GetUsersCustomers(' + CAST(@UserID AS VARCHAR(4)) + '))' + @Criteria + ' AND (number IN (SELECT DISTINCT ph1.number FROM Collect2000.dbo.payhistory ph1 LEFT JOIN Collect2000.dbo.payhistory ph2 ON ph1.UID = ph2.ReverseOfUID WHERE (((ph1.batchtype = ''PU'') OR (ph1.batchtype = ''PC'')) AND ph2.ReverseOfUID IS NULL)) OR code IN (SELECT DISTINCT StatusID FROM tbl_APR_Statuses WHERE SearchCategoryPaidPaymentsT1 = 1))'
I have a server which is using total of 12 cores running an instance of SQL server. I was told to dedicate only 8 cores of CPU to be used by the instance for licensing purposes.
what the best way is to go about limiting CPU cores?
hi, like, if i need to do delete some items with the id = 10000 then also need to update on the remaining items on the with the same idthen i will need to go through all the records to fetch the items with the same id right? so, is there something that i can use to hold those records so that i can do the delete and update just on those records and don't need to query twice? or is there a way to do that in one go ?thanks in advance!
I have a query that returns the data about test cases. Each test case can have multiple bugs associated to it. I would like a query that only returns the test cases that have all their associated bugs status = closed.For instance here is a sample of my data
Is there a performance limit on the number of indexes per table / database ? With Filtered indexes there appear to be many more opportunities for more finely defined, and therefore smaller indexes resulting in many more indexes on a single table.
I've read here at [URL] that with 32 bit it's recommended to only have 10 database mirrors per instance. However, is there a limit for 64 bit SQL Server 2012?
We're having a problem where we have about 300+ databases and now any new db's we add are timing out when it comes to setting up mirroring and am wondering if this is limited by the instance.
Hi,I'm using c# with a tableadapter to call stored procedures. I'm running into a problem where if I have over a certain byte size or number of parameters being passed into my stored proc I get an exception that reads: "Cannot evaluate expression because a thread is stopped at a point where garbage collection is impossible, possibly because the code is optimized." If I remove one parameter, the problem goes away. Has anyone run into this before? Thanks,Mark
Hi.. I have a column in the data base with the type Float, I want to limit the number of digits after decimal point to 2 when I display the value in ASP.NET but I don't know how!? the number that appear after calculation llike "93.333333" I use decimal(2,2) as data type but an error accour and this is the message "- Unable to modify table. Arithmetic overflow error converting float to data type numeric.The statement has been terminated." Can you help me.. thanks
Our development team wanted to create a database user for each application user in the application and use these for granular data access control, which at first, sounded like a good idea but our initial testing ran into some interesting results.
Our target user base was about 15 million users with an estimated 1% concurrency rate, and finding no MS documentation on an upper limit to the number of users a database can have we began some load testing to see how the database performed. In the hundreds of thousands of users range our test database had a hard time performing well under light loads (even without any concurrent connections).
When we purged the users and reverted back to just a handful of service accounts, performance went back to "normal" under the same loads. I began to wonder if this is a situation where throwing more hardware at the problem would overcome the issue or if there is a practical upper limit to the number of users a single database can handle well.
(There were of course other cons to this arrangement and I certainly was never going to expand the users tree in the object explorer for a database like this, but we thought it a solution worth investigating.)
What is the largest number of users any of you have had in a single database?